Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Biogas as a Sustainable Fuel and Feedstock: Properties, Purification, and Applications

Written By

Moses Jeremiah Barasa Kabeyi and Oludolapo Akanni Olanrewaju

Submitted: 16 November 2023 Reviewed: 02 February 2024 Published: 12 June 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114268

From the Edited Volume

From Biomass to Biobased Products

Edited by Eduardo Jacob-Lopes, Leila Queiroz Zepka and Rosangela Rodrigues Dias

Chapter metrics overview

32 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Biogas is a renewable energy resource derived from biomass mainly through anaerobic digestion. Methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and trace elements significantly affect the fuel. Hence, the undesirable components are undesirable and should be removed for various biogas applications. This makes it necessary to purify raw biogas to increase its utility making it suitable for many applications as a sustainable energy resource and process feedstock. Biogas can make substantial contribution to realization of sustainable development goals and the global energy transition. However, the wide-scale use of biogas is seriously constrained by the presence of harmful impurities as well as the low calorific value of biogas. The overall objective of this chapter is to investigate the properties of biogas, its cleaning, upgrading, and its sustainability as a transition energy resource for realization of sustainable development goals and the global energy transition. The chapter provides a comprehensive examination of the potential of biogas as a fuel and potential feedstock for various industrial processes. Furthermore, this study offers a comprehensive examination of the various technological alternatives that can be employed to harness biogas for the purpose of generating heat and electricity.

Keywords

  • raw biogas
  • biogas properties
  • biogas applications
  • energy potential of biogas
  • sustainability of biogas fuel
  • electricity from biogas
  • biogas reforming
  • liquid biofuels
  • Fischer-Tropsch

1. Introduction

Renewable energy sources like biogas and biomethane are important energy carriers when the society seeks to replace fossil fuels with sustainable energy sources [1]. Biogas is a renewable energy resource produced by anaerobic digestion of biomass mainly in the form of municipal waste, farm waste, food waste, and energy crops. Raw biogas typically consists of biomethane (30–80%), carbon dioxide (20–50%), and smaller amounts of nitrogen (1–10%) and varying composition of trace elements namely hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, hydrogen, and various volatile organic compounds depending on the feedstock of biogas. Life cycle assessment of biogas energy resource shows that biogas use effectively reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [2, 3, 4]. The production and use of biogas as an energy resource helps to diversify the energy systems while at the same time promoting sustainable biomass waste management recycling and disposal [2, 3, 5]. The growing energy demand and concerns over global climate change have increased demand for renewable and green energy sources. Various innovative approaches have been developed for bioenergy production and use as alternatives to fossil fuels as energy sources. Biogas is one of the viable energy options from organic wastes. The sustainability of biogas is enhanced further by production of organic manure as substitute for chemical fertilizers in crop production. Biogas can be used for heating, power generation, fuel, and processing. It could also be used to produce hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and biofuels sustainably. This vast range of applications makes biogas an attractive sustainable energy choice [2, 5, 6].

Over 59 billion m3 biogas or about 35 billion m3 methane equivalent of biogas by volume is produced globally on an annual basis with the European Union accounting for about half of this capacity. The energy generation capacity from biogas globally has expanded rapidly; for example it increased from 65 GW in 2010 to 120 GW in 2019, which is an increase of about 90% [2, 5]. Biogas is an important renewable energy resource whose production and use can aid in mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by substituting fossil fuels and promoting the utilization of biodegradable plant and animal waste feedstocks [7, 8]. As the modern society generates significant wastes, several waste disposal and treatment methods are employed to avoid environmental pollution with anaerobic digestion being one of the popular options as it additionally produces useful energy [9], which is a fundamental requirement for society [10, 11]. International treaties or agreements that commit countries to minimize their carbon footprint like the agenda 21 and Kyoto Protocol are motivating factors for production and use of biogas [12, 13], since they advocate for the transition to renewable and low carbon sources of energy to reduce the global greenhouse gas emissions particularly from the energy sector, which is dominated by fossil fuel sources of energy, with biogas being a very important option [14, 15].

Biogas can be produced from a variety of different types of biodegradable biomass like chicken manure, crop waste, and animal manure, through several processes but mainly by means of controlled anaerobic digestion. Raw biogas has feasible applications like heating and power generation as is, or it can be processed to biomethane and used to produce value-added chemicals. Purified or cleaned biogas has higher utility as a green fuel, and bio natural gas fed into natural gas pipes upon upgrading to remove carbon dioxide [8, 16], while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and contributing a huge potential for use as a renewable resource. In 2014, biogas accounted for almost 8% of Switzerland’s renewable energy generation (excluding hydropower) and 0.29% of the country’s overall energy consumption [17, 18, 19]. Biogas has a potential use as substitute for firewood and thus can protect the forest ecosystems. By 2040, it is projected that biogas will supply clean fuel for almost 200 million people, predominantly in Africa and Asia. Therefore, biogas is a significant player in realization of sustainable development goals [5, 20, 21, 22]. The SDGs and the energy transition to a green and low carbon energy and electricity mix will be much easier to accomplish with biogas as an alternative.

About 2.8 billion people globally rely on primary biomass fuel for their energy needs. Biogas production presents huge potential as a strategy to generate renewable energy products from biomass waste sources with significant economic and environmental benefits. The practical efficiencies indigestion is low, which calls for strategies available to overcome these barriers and create more efficient energy [19, 23]. It is the methane content of biogas that directly influences the energy value of biogas and hence the need to manage the process to ensure high methane composition and additionally control the polluting potential of organic residues having high contents of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) [24, 25]. With biogas proving to be a sustainable and renewable energy source [26, 27], the growing concerns over greenhouse gas emissions and climate change have generated significant interest in biogas as an energy resource for the global transition [28, 29], hence growing production of biogas from organic waste [30, 31] with common applications being power generation, heating applications like cooking, lighting, and biofuel production with biogas feedstock [6, 32, 33].

Providing modern energy services to their populations is a challenge for many developing nations; for instance, about 450 million people in India did not have access to modern energy for electricity and cooking [34, 35]. Technologies that conserve resources and revenue in agriculture are crucial to achieving sustainable food and energy production [34]. Coal, oil, and gas account for over 60% of global electricity generation, but renewables are steadily increasing their proportion, from 26% in 2015 to 28% in the first quarter of 2020, with variable renewables increasing from 8 to 9% during the same period [36]. Since 1990, the proportion of worldwide electricity output that comes from renewable sources has increased by an average of 2% per year, faster than the annual increase in electricity demand (1.8%). When compared to the annual capacity increases of solar photovoltaics (36.5%) and wind energy (23.0%), biogas’s 11.5% ranked third fastest. The substantial role played by biomass in global energy generation is evidenced by the 9.7% annual growth rate of biofuels since 1990 [37]. Particularly, the relevance of biogas in agriculture and food production cannot be overemphasized. Beyond providing food for all of humanity, agriculture is the primary source of income for more than two-thirds of the world’s population. In addition, nearly 82% of the global population is directly or indirectly involved in smallholder agriculture and other industries, making this economic activity the mainstay of many developing countries [34]. This shows that biogas is crucial to the energy transition and that agriculture and other carbon transformative processes should boost its production and consumption.

Biogas has a significant role to play in the impending energy transition as a renewable and sustainable energy resource because of its high energy conversion potential and widespread availability for power generation, for industrial applications as a renewable process feedstock, and for thermal energy applications [38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. In addition to producing biogas, the anaerobic digestion (AD) process leads to feedstock treatment during the treatment phase, and it can also produce digestate, which is a useful organic fertilizer that can replace chemical fertilizers in sustainable agriculture [43, 44]. An essential part of the global carbon cycle is the creation of biogas through microbial control, as natural anaerobic biodegradation releases 590 to 800 million tons of methane into the atmosphere annually [39, 45, 46]. Numerous different organic feedstocks are anaerobically digested to produce biogas, which can then be enhanced to produce natural gas such as biomethane [47, 48, 49]. The sustainable technique of turning biomass waste into biogas can lead to advantages including less carbon emissions, improved organic waste management, and increased resource use efficiency.

In terms of efficiency and cost, the Stirling engines and internal combustion engines theoretically offer the most viable options for converting biogas to electricity, particularly on a small scale. Comparatively, the electricity generated by internal combustion engines per kilowatt hour is cost competitive and efficient. The engines are available in a wider range of sizes, they are more flexible and efficient, and require less effort to operate and service [50, 51, 52]. For slightly larger plants, gas turbines are commonly utilized for power generation in the capacity range of 3 to 5 MW. Turbines and microturbines have less stringent fuel quality standard requirements compared to internal combustion engines making them ideal prime movers for raw biogas, which has a wide range of harmful impurities [53, 54, 55]. Both the steam turbine and the gas turbine power plants using biogas for power generation encounter higher total capital investment costs Biogas and biomethane provide a sustainable pathway to include rural businesses and communities in the energy transition. This can be accomplished by creating grid-connected electricity and reducing grid load by generating their own electricity and heat.

Biogas as an energy resource has the potential to contribute to sustainable energy transition if carefully produced through the process of anaerobic digestion of organic substrate under carefully regulated conditions and used in a manner that limits leakages of methane, which is a greenhouse gas [56, 57]. The energy content of biogas is contingent upon the methane composition, which is subject to influence from both the production process and the type of substrate employed. The composition of biogas may include elements like sulfur, which can make it inappropriate for use as a fuel in internal combustion engines and certain industrial chemical and thermal processes. The calorific value of biogas demonstrates variability because of its composition, primarily influenced by the relative abundance of methane. The heating value of biogas generally falls within the range of 21–23.5 MJ/m3, suggesting that an approximate equivalence of 0.5–0.6 liters of diesel fuel or roughly 6 kWh of electricity can be attributed to 1 m3 of biogas.

Biogas has significant potential as a sustainable and renewable energy resource, both currently and in the foreseeable future. Biogas energy can make a substantial contribution to the achievement of sustainable development goals and the global transition towards sustainable energy, because of its minimal greenhouse gas emissions, widespread availability, and access to raw materials. The widescale incorporation of biogas into the global energy mix has been constrained due to the presence of harmful impurities and low calorific value of raw biogas [11, 14, 31, 58]. The overall objective of this study is to investigate the properties of raw biogas as a fuel, its cleaning methods without necessarily upgrading to biomethane, and its sustainability as a transition energy resource for realization of sustainable development goals and the global energy transition. This chapter provides a comprehensive examination of the potential of biogas as a fuel and potential feedstock for various industrial processes. Furthermore, this study offers a comprehensive examination of the various technological alternatives that can be employed to harness biogas for the purpose of generating heat and electricity due to its significant energy potential and sustainability [59, 60, 61].

1.1 Problem statement

The heightening need for food and energy resulting from the growth of the global population, particularly in developing countries, has intensified the strain on energy production and consumption. The continued use of fossil fuels threatens humanity with unbearable consequences of climate change due to greenhouse gases, which are causing climate change [18, 34]. Although biogas has a great deal of promise to supply clean energy to both rural and urban populations, the prevalence of inoperable and abandoned biogas facilities has raised concerns about the sustainability of the technology [19, 62]. This poses questions concerning the dependable creation, distribution, and use of biogas fuel [35]. It is technically possible to convert this waste into valuable energy sources, thereby generating additional revenue [57, 63, 64]. The challenges facing biogas applications include lack of technical know-how, limited or lack of incentives and subsidies to make biogas competitive in several countries, and the low calorific value of and presence of harmful impurities in biogas. These challenges can be addressed by developing and accessing appropriate and affordable biogas technologies and development of a comprehensive policy on construction and operation of biodigesters, biogas utilization, and sustainable diversification in biogas energy products and services [2, 5, 6].

The implementation of biogas technology enables the harnessing of renewable energy through the utilization of crop and animal waste. The energy source exhibits significant potential for utilization in electricity generation and as a viable thermal energy solution for residential structures. The ultimate outcome of this process can be efficiently harnessed as a valuable fertilizer in rural agricultural environments and households, leading to a reduction in costs related to waste management and disposal [65]. Biogas energy can improve rural people’s lives and economies. Many small-holder farmers in developing nations burn biomass for disposal, even though it can be used as a fertilizer, and with biogas technology, an impoverished organic fertilizer that is more affordable can be made by smallholder farmers [66]. Designing biogas systems so that they can reliably supply most or 100% of their energy demands requires defining a number of factors [67].

Sustainable farm-level biogas energy requires appropriate infrastructure design and selection [18, 68]. Another thing to consider in such system design is the natural decomposition of agricultural waste that results in the emission of substantial amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere. For instance, in the year 2015, the exclusive contribution of livestock manure to methane emissions in the United States of America amounted to approximately 10%. However, a mere 3% of the total livestock waste underwent recycling via anaerobic digestion [57]. This presents the main issue in utilizing as it lies in its unsteady production value and variations in quality. These factors can potentially disrupt the generation process or hinder the effectiveness of biogas applications, resulting in reduced reliability [69].

1.2 Rationale of biogas cleaning/purification

Both developed and developing countries face challenges with utilization of significant organic waste and the mounting pressure to replace fossil energy resources like natural gas, oil, and coal with renewable energy sources. Anaerobic digestion of organic biomass is now a mature technology while biogas in its raw form or cleaned and upgraded forms has multiple applications as a bioenergy substitute of fossil fuel sources. The production and utilization of biogas has also been growing with capacity growing by more than double between 2009 and 2022 [70]. Methane fermentation occurs naturally in the process of organic matter decay in oxygen deficient environments like swamps and in landfills leading to natural emission of methane in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. Controlled biogas production can be used to reduce these natural emissions [4, 5]. This research presents biogas as a fuel and feedstock for applications like production of biomethane, methanol, syngas, power generation through combustion, or fuel cells, among others [71, 72, 73].

Biogas has a very important role to play in the ongoing energy transition as a renewable and sustainable energy resource because of its high energy conversion potential and the widespread availability for power generation, for industrial applications as a renewable process feedstock, and for thermal energy applications [38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. Additionally, anaerobic digestion (AD) is an effective waste treatment and disposal method while the digestate from biodigesters is a rich organic fertilizer [43, 44]. Anaerobic digestion is a critical process in the global carbon cycle which releases 590 to 800 million tons of methane into the atmosphere annually through uncontrolled biodegradation. These harmful emissions can be mitigated through controlled anaerobic digestion for useful biogas production [39, 45, 46]. The benefits of biogas fuel and its production process include reduced less carbon emissions, better organic waste management, and increased resource use efficiency [39, 74].

Biogas contributes to the sustainable transition as a renewable fuel with multiple applications as a fuel characterized by a high methane content, which is generated through the process of anaerobic digestion of organic substrate under carefully regulated biochemical process conditions [56, 57]. Indigestible carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids are not present in the biomass substrate utilized for biogas production, which can complicate or slow down the digestion [75, 76]. Biogas can also be used as a feedstock for production of biomethane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and various biofuels for a wide range of applications including generation of heat and power and feedstock for various industrial processes [77, 78].

The whole world has got about 2.8 billion people who rely on primary biomass fuel like coal, firewood, crop waste, and dried animal waste for their energy needs in cooking and heating, which leads to high-level household pollution [7]. Biogas production presents huge potential as a strategy to generate renewable energy products from biomass waste sources with significant economic and environmental benefits. The practical efficiency in biodigestion is low, which calls for strategies available to overcome these barriers and create more efficient energy systems [23]. It is the methane content of biogas that determines the energetic potential of biogas since it directly influences the calorific value of the fuel hence the need to manage the process to ensure high methane composition. Organic bio digestion additionally reduces the polluting potential of organic residues having high contents of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), while the substrate can be used as a nutrient rich valuable fertilizer [24, 25].

The human population is steadily growing leading to increased demand for food and energy, which simultaneously aggravates the environmental challenges. Substituting fossil fuels with renewable energy alternatives is currently a major global issue of the twenty first century and is a key sustainable development objective. Implementation of biogas technologies will significantly transform costly, socially sensitive issues and environmentally damaging fossil fuel dependence, environmental pollution, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, and waste conversion into profitable options like electricity generation, heat production, and production of biofertilizers as well as provision of green vehicular fuel substitute of fossil gas. A national biogas production development program can significantly lead to development of new enterprises, boost income for rural communities, and create new jobs to improve people’s socio-economic well-being [70].

1.2.1 Limitations/challenges facing biogas energy resources

The main challenges facing biogas production and use as an energy resource include high equipment cost and a lack of a governmental incentive programs in many countries, low reliability or lack of guarantee of long-term performance of biogas plants due to technological challenges, unpredictable investment environment, limited biogas distribution and storage capacity for some countries like Sweden, and low cost of commercial fertilizers as well as low cost of fossil fuels like gas and oil in some countries [24]. A study by [7] on household biogas digester use in rural China showed that there was rapid growth in the early part of the century in the use of household biogas digesters but the operations were never smooth because out of 1743 households interviewed, 42% adopted household biogas digesters, but on average they worked for just 6.66 months each year, which is an indicator of underutilization of the digestors.

1.2.2 Benefits of biogas as a renewable energy resource

Biogas has various applications that include production of biofuels as renewable energies; reduction in greenhouse gas emissions; removal of odors and flies, which are generally associated with uncontrolled biomass biodegrading; financial savings and revenue from biogas derived energy products like electricity and biomethane, waste treatment; and recycling of organic waste; reduced air and water pollution; alleviation of rural poverty; and better social conditions of rural or remote settlements, which include gender balance since the women who mainly bear the responsibility of looking for fuel will have an opportunity to engage in other tasks while forests and vegetation will be conserved due to reduced use of firewood and charcoal [2, 6, 79, 80].

The potential benefits associated with use of biogas as an energy resource including generating electrical energy from biogas may include the following:

  1. Facilitates decentralized generation, which is done close to consumers with benefits like reduced transmission and distribution costs.

  2. Generates extra income and savings from the energy produced from biogas and sold to the grids.

  3. A decrease in utility-purchased electricity that must be offset.

  4. Creating opportunities for cogeneration, which is a more efficient form of energy exploitation.

  5. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from methane to the atmosphere, which would have been emitted freely to the atmosphere from uncontrolled biodegradation, etc.

The challenges limiting full use of biogas that should be overcome include lack of national generating technologies, the need to clean biogas before use, the challenge of economic feasibilities that requires incentives, and the lack of penalties for possible environmental damages from biogas schemes [24, 25].

Advertisement

2. Composition and properties of biogas

Biogas composition is a function of many factors like process design and the nature of the substrate with the main components of biogas being methane and carbon dioxide, and other minor components in varying proportions [1]. Methane and carbon dioxide are the primary components of the gas mixture known as biogas. Hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen gas, moisture, and siloxanes are a few others. Carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and methane are the combustible components, and they generate heat for a wide range of thermal and electrical uses [81]. The composition of biogas produced from any given feedstock and any given level of control over that process will be unique. However, the main components of biogas are methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) [53]. With just one carbon and four hydrogen atoms, pure methane has no discernible odor. It is easier to ignite methane than it is to ignite air. A mixture of 5–15% of this substance with air is explosive. While methane alone is non-toxic, inhaling too much of it in a confined space can be fatal because it displaces oxygen. Since it may linger in the air for up to 15 years, methane is a potent greenhouse gas; on a 20-year time frame, it is nearly 20 times more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide [82, 83]. Because of the severe environmental concerns associated with the development and processing of biogas in the absence of effective regulation, this highlights the necessity for regulated bio-deration of organic wastes.

Biogas has multiple applications beyond just energy generation, including use as a feedstock in the petrochemical, hydrogen, and synthesis gas industries. Methane and carbon dioxide are the primary components of biogas, but other contaminants such as ammonia (NH3), water vapor, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), nitrogen (N2), methyl siloxanes, oxygen, halogenated volatile organic compounds (VOCs), hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide (CO) are often present as trace elements. For safety and efficiency reasons, it is necessary to filter out certain trace elements before using biogas as a fuel. Hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide are two examples. It is important to find ways to reduce the high operational expenses and energy consumption associated with biogas upgrading so that it can be used as a fuel [12, 13, 84].

2.1 Composition of biogas

Biogas is a mixture of gases consisting of methane and carbon dioxide as the main components, in addition to several trace elements like carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen gas, moisture, and siloxanes. Carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and methane are the combustible constituents with methane content being the main determinant of heating value of biogas. Combustion of biogas generates heat for various thermal and electricity applications with related emissions, mainly carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. Biogas composition of biogas varies based on the substrate used and the process control applied [2, 3].

Methane is the main constituent of biogas that generally accounts c 50–80% composition, while other constituents are carbon dioxide (20-45%), water vapor (2%), and trace gases like O2 N2, NH3 H2 H2S [56, 77]. Biogas may also contain siloxanes formed in anaerobic decomposition of materials commonly found in detergents and soaps. The composition varies with feedstock and process, for example, landfill has average methane composition of about 50%, while advanced waste treatment technologies yield 55%–75% methane content. Reactors with free liquids can generate biogas with 80%-90% methane content using in-situ gas purification techniques [2, 85, 86]. The average biogas composition is shown in Table 1.

ElementComposition (%)
1Methane30–80%
2Carbon dioxide20–50%
3Nitrogen0.5–10%
4Ammonia0–0.05%
5Moisture2–8%
6Hydrogen0–1%
7Hydrogen sulfide0.1–3%
8Oxygen0.1–3%
9Ammonia0–0.5%
10Carbon monoxide0–0.1
11R2SiO0–0.5 mg/m3
12CxHy0–1%

Table 1.

Average composition of biogas [2, 16, 25, 49, 53, 56, 66, 87, 88, 89].

Based on the data presented in Table 1, it can be observed that the predominant constituents of biogas consist of methane and carbon dioxide. The relative proportions of these components generally vary between 30 and 80%, with the specific range being contingent upon factors such as the quality of the feedstock utilized and the efficacy of process management.

2.2 Thermodynamic properties of biogas

The H2S concentration can be reduced through chemical, biological, and physical means, whereas the water content can be reduced through condensation in gas storage or along the gas stream [42, 77]. With rising methane content, biogas has a calorific value that varies between 5000 and 7000 kcal/m3. A comparable volume of biogas (1 m3) can be produced by: 0.7 m3 of natural gas; 0.6 kilograms each of kerosene, gasoline, and butane; 3.5 kg each of wood and dung briquettes; 4 kWh each of electricity and carbon; and 0.43 kg each of butane [39, 90]. At 0.1013 Mpa and 273 K, biogas consists of 60% methane and 40% carbon dioxide. Molar mass 16.04, specific heat capacity 2.165 kJ/kg. K, and ignition temperature between 650 to 750°C are shown for biogas in Table 2.

PropertySymbolValue
1Specific heat capacityCp2.165 kJ/kgK
2Molar massM16.04
3Gas constantR0.518 kJ/kg
4Normal densityg1.2 g/l
5Critical densitygc320 g/l
6Relative (to air) densitygr0.83
7Calorific value of biogasLCV22.6 Mj/m3
8Critical temperatureT−2.5 °C
9Critical pressurep7.3–8.9 Mpa
10Flammability limit content in airv6–12%
11Ignition temperatureT650-750°C

Table 2.

Thermodynamic properties of biogas [77, 90, 91].

From Table 2, it is noted that the thermodynamic properties of biogas are competitive with those of other fuels. Due to its advantages for the environment, biogas is a desirable fuel despite having somewhat worse thermal properties than fossil fuels [71, 92, 93]. Table 3 lists the biogas equivalents of various fuels with remarks.

Device/
technology
ApplicationRemarks
1Fuel cellElectricity generationThough expensive, fuel cells are more efficient
2Hydrogen productionBiomethane can be converted to hydrogen for use as combustion fuel or electricity and process chemicals.Renewable hydrogen can be produced from biogas or biomethane by dry reforming, steam reforming, or hydrolysis
3BiomethanationBiomethane can be fed to natural gas supply as substitute for natural gasRenewable replacement of fossil natural gas is feasible with use of biomethane
4Diesel engineBiomethane can be used as a diesel engine fuel in either dual fuel mode or pure gas enginesDiesel engines have more fuel flexibility and efficiency and can easily use biofuels as fossil fuel substitutes
5Gas/petrol engineBiomethane can be used as a fuel for petrol or gasoline engines with little or no modificationThe gas/petrol engines are less efficient engines compared to diesel engines but are simpler and easier to convert to biogas engines
6Stirling engineStirling engines are also called hot air engines.The Stirling engines can operate on a wide variety of fuels due to high adaptability
7Gas turbineBased on size, gas turbines can be micro, small, or large gas turbines in open, closed, or combined cycle configurationTurbines are simple in construction, are versatile, and can use raw biogas as well as biomethane and are easy to operate.
8CogenerationIn cogeneration, biomethane is burned to simultaneously produce useful heat and electricity.Cogeneration with biomethane as a fuel can be applied on various conversion systems like Stirling engines, diesel engines, gas turbines, hydrogen, and fuel cells to increase system efficiency
9TrigenerationTrigeneration refers to generation of electricity and both heating and cooling from same fuel/energy resource simultaneouslyTrigeneration is costly and complex but the most effective method of energy conversion

Table 3.

Summary of biogas to electricity conversion systems and technologies.

2.3 Energy and electricity potential of biomass

Biogas can be used for different purposes, including electricity and heat production (cogeneration), heat only, power only, biomethane, fuel for vehicles, high tech process energy, and in the chemical industry as feedstock material. With average caloric value of calorific value of biogas being 21–23.5 MJ/m3, 1 m3 of biogas is an equivalent of 0.5–0.6 liters of diesel fuel or 6 kWh in energy content. But due to inefficiencies and losses, 1 m3 of biogas yields around 1.7 kWhe [5, 44, 59]. Biogas output and energy generation from various substrates are compared in Table 4.

TypeElectricity produced per ton fresh matter (kW·h)Biogas yield per ton fresh matter (m3)
1Fat1687.4826–1200
2Maize silage409.6200/220
3Chicken litter/dung257.3126
4Food waste (disinfected)224.6110
5Municipal solid waste207.2101.5
6Fruit wastes151.674
7Cattle dung122.555–68
8Horse manure114.356
9Sewage sludge96.047
10Pig slurry23.511–25

Table 4.

Electricity produced from biogas yield per ton of fresh matter.

From Table 4, it is noted that different feedstocks have different biogas potential with fats having the highest potential followed by maize silage and chicken droppings. Pig slurry and sewage sludge have some lowest values of biogas potential. The conversion factors are 35% electrical efficiency, and 55% methane content [27]. When compared to maize silage, chicken manure, and sterilized food waste, fat has the highest biogas yield and largest biogas and electricity potential.

Advertisement

3. Energy content and potential of biogas

The energy content of biogas varies but a typical normal cubic meter of methane has a calorific value of around 10 kWh, but CO2 being noncombustible has zero, making methane the ultimate determinant of the energy value of biogas. At 60% methane composition, then, the energy content of biogas would be less than 10 kWh per normal cubic meter, as CO2 and other noncombustible impurities absorb instead of generating heat [1, 2, 94]. The primary factor influencing the thermal energy content of biogas is the methane composition within the gas mixture. The volumetric composition of methane in biogas widely varies based on factors like the feedstock used and process control [49, 95, 96]. This disparity suggests that biogas's LHV ranges between 16 and 28 MJ/m3, rather than remaining stable at a single value. Combustion of biogas releases thermal energy that can be used for cooking or other uses like internal combustion engines [3]. Raw biogas has undesirable components like hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and various volatile organic compounds whose presence and composition are determined by the feedstock used and process control applied [33, 97].

3.1 Biogas for engine applications

Biogas can be used as a fuel internal combustion engine although it requires some modifications on the engine design and ignition to handle gaseous biogas fuel instead of the traditional liquid fuels. Biogas has higher octane rating (MON = 130) enabling it to sustain higher compression ratios without engine knocking, hence better engine performance [51, 98, 99, 100]. Historically, the use of biogas as an engine fuel started during the Second World War (2WW), as Germany and its Nazi territories had challenges sourcing fuel vehicles and farm machinery [44, 62]. This forced them to resort to sewage gas and biogas from manure and digesters, which were bottled and used as fuel during the crises.

Biogas is an efficient, sustainable, and environmentally friendly fuel that can perform optimally in spark ignition engines modified to suit its specific properties. The performance and utility of biogas as engine fuel is increased by methane enrichment or the addition of hydrogen to improve its flame quality [1]. The main challenge with biogas as engine fuel is the gaseous nature, which means low volumetric density. Biogas as an engine fuel is improved by biogas upgrading, methane enrichment, prechamber combustion, alteration of ignition parameters, higher compression ratio, and addition of hydrogen for better performance and emissions management [98, 101].

The following are some guidelines to consider when selecting biogas engine fuel.

  1. The amount of methane present must be high.

  2. The amount of water and carbon dioxide (CO2) should be minimized to maximize energy production based on high calorific value.

  3. Acids produced by the condensation or combustion of sulfur corrode metals by eating away at their surface and should therefore be removed.

3.2 Energy content and equivalents of biogas

Biogas is an odorless and colorless gas that burns with a clear blue flame like natural gas but has a lower calorific value of 20–26 MJ/m3 (537–700 Btu/ft3) compared to natural gas whose caloric value is 39 MJ/m3 (1028 Btu/ft3) [6, 33, 94]. Energy equivalents of biogas are presented in Table 5.

Alternative fuelBiogas EquivalentRemarks
11 kg of petrol2.5 m3 of biogasHas less energy content than petrol
21 kg of carbon2.33 m3 of biogasCarbon has higher energy value than biogas
31 liter of kerosene2.0 m3Biogas can limit fossil fuel dependence and use
41 kg of fuel oil1.42 m3 of biogasHas lower energy content than fuel oil
51 m3 of natural gas1.43 m3 of biogasHas lower energy content, may need purification
61 kg charcoal0.5 m3 biogasBiogas use limits forest destruction
71 kg of firewood0.29 m3Biogas can be used to avoid deforestation
81 kWhr of electricity0.25 m3 of biogasBiogas can substitute grid electricity use
91 kWhr of electricity0.25 m3 of biogasBiogas can substitute grid electricity use
101 kg of dried cow dung0.1 m3Biogas has more energy value than dried cow dung
111 kg of manure briquette0.083 m3 of biogasBiogas has more energy value

Table 5.

Energy equivalents of biogas [77, 90, 91].

From Table 5, it is noted that biogas has a higher energy value than manure briquettes, but it has a lower energy content than fossil fuels. But it is a potential substitute for fossil fuels and cuts down on forest clearance at the same time.

The calorific value of the biogas generally varies between 22.5 and 25 MJ/m3, or 6.25 and 10 kWh/m3 assuming methane has heating value of 35.8 MJ/m3. The energy content can be further enhanced if the raw biogas is upgraded to biomethane [24, 25]. Biogas with 55% CH4 has an average calorific value of about 21.5 MJ/m3, compared to pure methane (CH4), which has a calorific value of about 35.56 MJ/m3, which is one of the main reasons for upgrading by removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from raw biogas [4, 5, 70]. Table 6 shows the energy value of biogas compared to other fuels like butane, natural gas, and propane.

Fuel/elementCalorific value (MJ/m3)
1Butane117.23
2Propane92.11
3Methane35.56
4Natural gas31.82
5Biogas22.5 to 25
6Biomethane23.02

Table 6.

Calorific value of common gaseous fuels.

From Table 6, it is noted that biogas has the lowest calorific value compared to methane, propane, butane, natural gas, and biomethane. Therefore, upgrading to biomethane can improve its calorific value making it more competitive thermodynamically.

Advertisement

4. Biogas purification/cleaning

The quality of biogas fuel for use in power generation and other applications can be improved using a variety of techniques. By guaranteeing constant fermentation through continuous supply of feedstock of the right quality and digestion at the ideal parameters of C/N ratio, PH, dilution, and digestor temperature, biogas output can be optimized. A little amount of oxygen or air can be injected into the headspace of a storage fermenter to help hydrogen sulfide (H2S) be oxidized by microorganisms, leading to the removal of a significant portion of the sulfate from the gaseous phase. This technique is the most affordable and popular way to desulfurize biogas, removing up to 95% of the sulfur [27, 102].

The second method involves filtering the water with iron oxide and activated carbon as part of an external chemical treatment. Iron hydroxide is used in a reversible procedure that regenerates the filter by adding oxygen [99]. As an alternative, adsorption materials like iron-rich soils or leftovers from the steel or aluminum industries can be used. The governing equation is given by the relation.

FeOH2+H2SFeS+2CH2OE1

Activated carbon filters are used as standard components are provided for the system [77, 103].

Raw biogas is generally corrosive making it necessary to carefully select and maintain equipment material and to treat raw biogas. The corrosive nature of biogas is because of the presence of traces of hydrogen sulfide. The internal combustion engine and micro-turbine applications recommend allowable H2S levels in the biogas, of 10 ppm or 0.0001% by volume for internal combustion engines and 5000 ppm. For microturbine. Different countries have also imposed different quality standards e.g., in Brazil the standard emission for sulfates according to CONAMA (the national environmental agency) is limited to 1.0 mg of S L−1. Air pollutants containing sulfur include SO2, SO3, H2S, and sulfates. Ammonia is also a corrosive element in raw biogas and can be released in the form of nitrogen oxides as a product of combustion. Nitrogen oxides are also harmful to human health and to the environment [24, 25].

Advertisement

5. Biogas applications

Biogas can be utilized in its raw, cleaned, or upgraded form for several applications as an energy resource and as a feedstock for several chemical processes. These applications include production of biomethane, hydrogen production, fuel cell energy source, production of biofuels, power generation, and thermal applications as a heat source [2, 5]. Biogas is used in combined heat and power (cogeneration), heating, feedstock for biomethane production used as a direct substitute of natural gas in applications like automotive fuel, industrial process heating, and feedstock in chemical industries [59, 96]. The various applications of biogas are discussed below.

5.1 Biomethane production

Biomethane is a product of biogas or syngas upgrading having superior properties to biogas, and a desirable substitute of natural gas. Compressed biomethane can be utilized as cooking gas in industrial settings, distributed by injecting it into natural gas mains, and packaged in containers or cylinders for home use. The main barrier is the processing cost, which is inversely proportionate to the type of technology used. The term “bio-CNG” refers to compressed fuel with a high methane content. To make bio-CNG, pure biogas that contains more than 97% methane is compressed to 20–25 MPa. Compressed bio-CNG has the same fuel characteristics, economics, engine performance, and emissions as regular CNG. Due to its high-octane number, bio CNG, like conventional CNG, offers outstanding thermal efficiency. As a result, it can be utilized as a direct substitute for regular compressed natural gas in gas pipes and other applications, such as a natural gas fuel source [104].

5.2 Hydrogen production

Hydrogen is an ideal raw material for a sustainable energy transformation, but with the challenge being where and how to get hydrogen from renewable sources. Renewable hydrogen can be produced using renewable energy sources and usually produced via water electrolysis [105]. Biogas has applications beyond electricity and biomethane production, as, through steam reforming, it can be used to manufacture green hydrogen, in a process where a catalyst refines and separates the hydrogen from the gas stream [41, 105]. The most common method used to manufacture hydrogen is by steam-reforming of natural gas, followed by pressure-swing adsorption to remove impurities. Small steam reformers in biogas plants are in commercial operation [105]. The biogas has low heating coefficient due to high composition of non-combustibles like carbon dioxide and water vapor which reduce the energy content [105]. Upon removal of carbon dioxide and water molecules, the methane (CH4) can be used for hydrogen synthesis and bio-fuel production. Methane can be split to hydrogen molecules (H2) in a process that can be done in a steam/methane reformer. In the process, high pressure and temperature steam is combined with the methane (CH4) to produce flow of hydrogen molecules and CO molecules [48, 106].

It is through thermochemical processes of hydrocarbons that large-scale hydrogen production is manufactured through the reforming process. Biomethane has significant potential application in hydrogen manufacture as a substitute of fossil natural gas as a raw material for reforming processes. The demand for renewable hydrogen production is set to grow significantly due to concerns over fossil fuels depletion and greenhouse gas emissions, and associated concerns over global climate change. The selection of the reforming process is influenced by the availability of capital, hydrogen demand, purity hydrogen and the composition of the biogas feedstock used [8, 107].

Biogas can be used in fuel cells for power generation. This technology promises to play a key role in the hydrogen economy for sustainable energy transition. Hydrogen fuel cells can be used as prime movers in electric vehicles just like batteries do, in addition to application in power generation [21, 108]. Biomethane derived from biogas can be used as a source for renewable hydrogen, for stationary fuel cells in power generation and fuel cells as prime movers for electric vehicles (FCEVs). The hydrogen-powered FCEVs are environmentally attractive since they have no tailpipe emissions making them clean transport option and substitute for fossil fuel-powered vehicles [2, 107].

Use of biomethane for hydrogen production can increase energy sustainability for energy applications like fossil fuels. Hydrogen can be manufactured by autothermal reforming (ATR), electrolysis, or methane reforming (SMR) [109]. Biomethane can be used as a substitute for natural gas, which will provide a hedge against growing demand for natural gas [107].

Hydrogen fuel can be used to reduce emissions from engines that are widely used in transportation. Hydrogen fuel cells promise to provide an alternative to internal combustion (IC) engines particularly due to the clean exhaust emissions, renewal nature of the fuel, and higher efficiencies. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles can achieve widespread acceptance except for existing challenges like waste heat removal in mobile applications [110].

5.3 Production of biofuels

The transport sector is important since it accounts for about 14% of the global greenhouse gas emissions [111]. Liquefied biomethane is not only an effective fuel for generators and other large machinery, but it may also be utilized as a building block in the production of other fuels and chemicals. As an alternative to fossil fuels and several other processed transport fuels, biomethane is already being used by several countries [50, 112].

Biofuels include the Bio-CNG, which is compressed biomethane like CNG in properties with industrial, automotive, and domestic applications. The process needs removal of impurities likes water, N2, O2, H2S, NH3, and CO2 to achieve composition of >97% CH4, <2% O2 at 20–25 MPa. Bio-CNG occupies less than 1% of the volume at standard conditions [112, 113].

Biomethane can also be used in the industry as transport fuel by liquefying it at a high pressure ranging from 0.5 to 15 MP [4]. Through biological or chemical processes, biomethane made from biogas can be converted into methanol, diesel, LPG, and gasoline. As can be seen in the picture below, methane is partially oxidized to produce methanol [2].

CH4+0.5O2CH3OHH0=128kJ/molE2

In another method, methane is biologically converted from biomethane to methanol by using methanotrophic bacteria used in methanol production through the action of methane monooxygenase (MMO) enzyme [5].

Methanol can also be produced by reforming methane to syngas then followed by catalytic conversion of syngas to methanol as shown below [6].

2H2+COCH3OH+2H2H0=91kJ/molE3
3H2+CO2CH3OH+H2OH0=49kJ/molE4

Then, the methanol-to-gasoline process can be utilized to convert the methanol into gasoline. Biogas or biomethane can be turned into methanol using the dry reforming, steam reforming, partial oxidation reforming, autothermal reforming (ATR), or Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process. Syngas, the main byproduct of the biomethane reforming procedure, can be used to produce a wide variety of long-chain hydrocarbons [114].

  1. Dry Reforming

    In dry reforming, CO and H2 are produced by the reaction of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). The process uses CH4 and CO2 which are both greenhouse gases making it very attractive. However, the endothermic reaction reduces heat emitted in CO2 production. Dry reforming is an effective method of creating synthesis gas with an H2/CO ratio close to 1 is dry reforming [115]. The syngas ratio (H2/CO = 1) produced by dry reforming is lower than that of steam reforming. In this reaction, the water gas shift reaction (WGS) influences H2/CO ratio by decreasing it because of the reverse reaction that oxidises hydrogen to water. Through partial oxidation of methane with feeding water, the H2/CO ratio is maintained between 1 and 2. This improves the responsiveness for shifting water and gas ahead. Due to the exothermic nature of partial oxidation, the energy requirement of the process is significantly reduced [114]. Dry reformation occurs within a temperature range of 700–1000°C [114, 116].

    CH4+CO22CO+2H2H0=247kJ/molE5

  2. Steam Reforming and Water Shift Reaction

    This process combining methane in biomethane with water vapor generates CO and H2 in the presence of a catalyst. The process is endothermic and takes place between 650 and 850°C, to produce hydrogen yield of 60–70% [115]. Steam reforming takes place between 700 and 900°C. The two-step chemical reaction is shown below.

    CH4+H2OCO+3H2H0=206kJ/molE6
    CO+H2OCO2+H2H0=41kJ/molE7

    The process of steam reforming is often followed by a water shift reaction to improve hydrogen generation.

  3. Partial Oxidation Reforming (POR)

    Compared to steam reformation, which is very endothermic, this process produces hydrogen at a lower energy cost due to its mild exothermicity. H2 and CO are produced by the partial oxidation at atmospheric pressure and between 700 and 900°C partial oxidation reforming. The H2/CO ratio of 2 yield is achieved in full conversion with reduced soot formation. Methane reacts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide (CO2) due to a decrease in CO selectivity. The high exothermicity of the combustion causes hotspots to emerge in the reactor bed and coke to deposit on the catalyst [115]. In this process, methane is oxidized to syngas as demonstrated below.

    CH4+0.5O2CO+2H2H0=25.2kJ/molE8

  4. Autothermal Reforming (ATR)

    Combining POR and SR in the presence of carbon dioxide results in autothermal reforming. Autothermal reforming (ATR) is a process wherein steam reforming occurs in a catalytic zone heated by heat generated by partial oxidation in the reactor. The process does not need external heating and the reactor is easy to stop and restart. Compared to partial oxidation reaction, the hydrogen yield is higher and consumes less oxygen [115].

5.3.1 Upgrading syngas

Dry reforming results in Syngas, which must be devoid of carbon dioxide before being fed into the Fischer-Tropsch reactor. Amines are highly selective in their ability to absorb carbon dioxide. Other applications of this technology are separation of CO2 from flue gases, natural gas cleaning, and large-scale upgrading of biogas. Common solvents used in the process are alkanolamines like monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) [32, 117].

5.3.2 Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process

The Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis, named after the German inventors Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch, is a process used to manufacture liquid hydrocarbon fuels like coal-to-liquids (CTL) and/or gas-to-liquids (GTL) based on source of syngas [32, 117]. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FT synthesis) can be used to convert biomethane and natural gas into fuels at an industrial scale [114]. The Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process converts syngas to products like LPG, diesel, and jet fuels [117].

The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FT-synthesis) polymerizes the carbon and hydrogen atoms in syngas or biomethane to create long chain molecules. The process is run over iron or cobalt catalyst at 20–30 bars [14] in an overall exothermic process leading to polymerization of CH2 to hydrocarbons with long chains called syncrude. The various reactions in Fischer-Tropsch process are summarized below.

2n+1H2+nCOCnH2n+nH2OE9
2nH2+H2+nCOCnH2n+nH2OE10

Reactors used include multi-tubular fixed bed, circulating fluidized bed, fixed fluidized bed, and slurry reactor. The reactions for the slurry reactor conditions are 20–30 bar, and 200–300°C while the syngas H2/CO ratio of 1–1.8 [114, 117]. For high temperature synthesis, fluidized-bed FT reactors are used to generate light hydrocarbons in the form of gaseous hydrocarbons and gasoline and generally have higher output. The catalysts used are Fe and Co, which are sensitive to sulfur compounds in syngas [117].

5.3.3 Biofuels from biomethane

Various biofuels can be made from biomethane for the transport sector e.g. methanol, compressed biogas (CBG), hydrogen, liquid biogas (LBG), dimethyl ether, and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) fuels [118]. Compressed biogas (CBG), liquefied biogas (LBG), syngas (used to make hydrogen, methanol, dimethyl ether (DME), and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) diesel), and biomethane (upgraded biogas) are all possible fuels that can be made through various processes [6, 33, 118].

5.4 Biomethane for gas and power grids

In many countries, governments have come up with national support schemes to promote the biomethane market. Support mechanisms include feed-in support schemes, green gas products, and quota obligations as market drivers in Europe. Biomethane production for many countries is based on organic waste as feedstock, but for Germany, which dominates Europe’s feed-in market, it is based on energy crops. In Germany, the main driver is the feed-in tariff for renewable electricity through the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG). Biomethane support schemes mainly rely on mass balancing systems or ‘book and claim’ certificates. Existing mass balancing systems can contribute to international market development through the creation of common standards. As biomethane becomes popular and relevant in the energy systems, integration into power and gas grids and shift away from subsidies to markets and competition with natural gas will become major issues [119, 120].

Biomethane should meet some standard specifications with respect to storage and transport before it can be practically injected into existing natural gas networks. The presence of various components in different concentrations makes it difficult to inject biogas to the grid hence the need for upgrading. Pipeline designers should know what the exact thermodynamic properties of a gas mixture are, particularly in terms of density, and heating value, which may tend to vary greatly in biogas [16].

Biomethane has a very important role to play in the transition to renewable sources of energy. Demand-based production of biomethane for power generation directly links the gas grid and the electricity grids, which can help in balancing the power grid. The gas grid will shift from fossil fuel distribution to provide energy balancing service provider with short-term as well as seasonal storage options. There is increasing integration of decentralized biomethane feed-in into the gas grid for the gas grid infrastructure thus introducing new challenges. There are examples in Germany of facilities that feed in more biomethane to the local distribution network than the total discharge, which leads to the need to compress the excess gas and transfer it to a higher level [119].

Production of biomethane from energy crops has a negative impact on agriculture. On the other hand, use of digestion residues as fertilizers close to biogas production site improves local nutrient cycles. Production of energy-intensive nitrogen fertilizers and use of declining global phosphorous reserves can be avoided by use of bio-fertilizer from the digesters [51, 62].

Biomethane is the most efficient biofuel in terms of fuel production equivalent per area of crop land needed and is therefore expected to perform a larger role in the fuel/energy market because of government support, growing use in NGVs and reduction in GHG emissions. There is growing awareness of biomethane and a shift in perception from regarding biomethane as a sub-branch of biomass production to an independent renewable energy resource. And legislation and strategies are recognizing biomethane as an independent energy resource [119, 121].

The main sustainability challenge facing biomethane market is cost of subsidies and need for free market competition with fossil natural gas, which can be accelerated if the market price of natural gas rises. The European cap-and-trade for greenhouse gas emissions GHGs is another driving factor for the future. Since use of biomethane omits GHG emissions, there will not be compensation or penalties in the form of GHG certificates [119, 122].

The evolution of biomethane markets is expected to create its own demand and supply and enable and exchange between different countries since the green gas product market opened to international trade. Countries tend to create their own set of biomethane support schemes to address individual situations and therefore designed to address the priorities and challenges of specific countries. For the biomethane market to grow, countries should open their support schemes to biomethane imported from neighboring countries to encourage international trade in biomethane [6, 119].

5.5 Electricity from biogas and biomethane

Biogas can be used as fuel for power generation in various prime movers. They include internal combustion engines, gas turbines of varying sizes, and fuel cells, among others. The efficiency can be improved through combustion and conversion in set ups like cogeneration and tri-generation schemes [2, 50]. Diesel engines can run biogas as a direct substitute of natural gas. Biogas can also be upgraded to biomethane for applications like substitution of natural gas [123, 124]. Diesel engines can be run effectively either on pure diesel or in dual fuel mode with biogas and fossil fuel like diesel and petrol [123, 125].

Onsite electricity from biogas can be used directly to avoid or limit electricity power imports from the grid while excess generation can be used for a wide in fuel cells [5, 8, 126]. Various pathways for use of biomethane for power generation are summarized in Table 3 below.

From Table 3, biomethane can be used through various conversion technologies with varying characteristics in thermal and electricity generation. The conversion can be done in cogeneration, trigeneration, and open conversion systems. Prime movers that can use biogas include internal combustion engines, gas turbines, fuel cells, and Stirling engines as well as production of fuels for application in transport, heat, and electricity generation [89].

In the transport sector, biomethane has a double role to play in emissions reduction i.e. as a direct fuel substitute of fossil fuels and as feedstock for production of biofuels/chemicals through the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Process e.g. diesel, jet fuel, and gasoline, and through reforming processes to produce hydrogen and methanol [2, 100].

Biogas production, its upgrading, and use are associated with some limited greenhouse gas emissions like CO2, CH4, and N2O whose quantities vary with the technology applied and the source of biogas or feedstock used. The use of biomethane reduces the negative environmental impact and pollution potential as a substitute for fossil fuel energy sources. Additionally, the anaerobic digestion and gasification used to produce biogas and syngas help keep the environment clean and healthy as a means of waste disposal [87, 127, 128]. Figure 1 shows pathways for biogas use as a renewable source of energy.

Figure 1.

Biogas applications.

From Figure 1, it is observed that upon cleaning and purification, biogas has got many applications like bio-CNG applications, CNG, heat and production, and reforming to produce syngas and fuels by the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Process. Other energy and process products are methanol, ethanol, higher alcohols, and gasoline.

Diesel engines, petrol and oil-fired engines, turbines, microturbines, and Stirling engines are all viable options for converting biogas into mechanical power for use in power generation. Biogas can be used as a fuel in both spark ignition (petrol) and compression ignition (diesel) engines with varying degrees of modification. Internal combustion engines with a dual fuel mode can be used with minimal or no adaptation, in contrast to those that undergo a full engine conversion to petrol. Biogas is an important component in the development of sustainable energy since it may be used in fuel cells for direct conversion to electricity, and as a feedstock for the manufacture of hydrogen and transportation fuels. Biogas can also be used as a feedstock for manufacture of the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) fuels, in addition to being utilized for direct energy generation, cooking, and lighting. The biogas is cleaned and purified, then it is reformed into syngas and partially oxidized to create methanol, which can be used to make petrol. Alcohols, jet fuel, diesel, and petrol may all be made from syngas using the Fischer-Tropsch process [2, 5].

Advertisement

6. Sustainability of biogas production and applications

Sustainable biogas systems incorporate systems for treatment of waste, environmental protection, conversion of low value material to higher value material, and power generation, heat, and advanced gaseous biofuels. Biogas and anaerobic digestion systems are dispatchable and hence can support intermittent renewable electricity [86]. Biogas adds value to the three pillars of sustainable development dimensions (SDDs) i.e., the first pillar of SDD is “Economic.” SDG number 1 is related to this pillar, “No poverty,” where biogas contributes by supplying affordable biofertilizer and eliminating the complex supply chain of fertilizer. Biogas contributes to SDG number 2, which is about “Zero hunger,” by generating new jobs through new businesses creation and increasing the yield of crops due to affordable fertilizer, which enhances the soil fertility by replenishing lost nutrients and carbon. Biogas fuel contributes to SDG number 3, which is about “Decent work and economic growth,” by increasing the gross domestic product through economic utilization of waste. Biogas also contributes to the SDG number 4, which is about “Industry, Innovation, and infrastructure,” by building sustainable infrastructure and providing electricity to small-scale industries at local level [5, 8, 129].

6.1 Environmental and health impact of biogas energy resource

Biogas environmental benefits are valid and sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels that can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and can enhance energy security. Biogas enables exploitation of agricultural and zootechnical byproducts and municipal wastes, due to their lower impact on the environment compared to other combustion-based energy options [130]. Biogas can reduce greenhouse gas emission by more than 100% by considering decreased use of fertilizer on account of substrate use and control of leakages of methane and nitrous oxides from biogas energy systems [1, 130, 131]. Biogas has environmental and health impacts to be considered before its selection and application as a fuel. Biogas has negative impacts on human health and on the air quality. Biogas has components that are potentially toxic to human health and the environment, by forming toxic substances in the process of combustion, or formation of toxic substances during photochemical aging in the atmosphere [39, 79]. Methanethane, which is odorless, consists of one atom of carbon and 4 atoms of hydrogen. It is lighter than air and is highly flammable and hence should be handled with care since it can form explosive mixtures with air at concentrations of 5 to 15%. Methane is not toxic but causes death due to asphyxiation through oxygen displacement in an enclosed environment [44, 126]. Methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas, which is about 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide and can remain in the atmosphere for up to 15 years. Therefore, uncontrolled biogas generation and handling is harmful to the environment and hence effort should be made to ensure controlled biodegradation of organic wastes to produce biogas energy resources [3, 122].

6.2 Life cycle assessment of biogas

The life cycle assessment of biogas shows that by deploying biogas technologies, energy related greenhouse gas emissions can effectively be reduced and hence reduce the climate impact of energy consumption. The use as well as production of biogas also help diversify energy systems while promoting sustainable waste management practice because anaerobic digestion also results in waste treatment [3, 132, 133]. Therefore there are significant environmental, economic, and social benefits of biogas production, using the circular agricultural waste utilization model [7, 39, 79]. Biogas is a renewable energy carrier used in electricity generation, in heat production, and as a transportation fuel. Most biogas is produced by anaerobic digestion of animal and plant materials [79, 99].

Health and environmental concerns over biogas use often hamper the social acceptance of biogas. Environmental factors considered in the use of biogas are direct emissions of gaseous pollutants e.g. nitrogen oxides (NOx), impact of using waste biomass and digestate, nitrogen release and soil fertility, and methane leakages [130, 131, 134].

The biogas circular economy has multiple functions like waste treatment, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, environmental production, and energy applications. The restorative and generative structure of circular economy seeks to maintain the products and materials always used and their maximum value [49, 64]. Biogas generation occurs at the last stage of anaerobic digestion with digestate, as the byproduct having valuable use as biofertilizer. Therefore biogas production is a value addition process for biowaste [30]. Figure 2 shows the main concept of circular economy.

Figure 2.

Life cycle stages in the linear, recycling, and circular economy models.

From Figure 2, it is noted that substitution of fossil fuels by biogas leads to significant environmental improvements. Generation of 1 MJ of electricity from biogas equivalently substitutes 0.4 and 0.9 MJ of fossil fuel and thus heat and power production reduces greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), by 75–90%. The emissions reduction in emissions is reduced further by substituting chemical fertilizers with digestate. Utilizing manure or food industry waste as a feedstock for biogas production is one of the feasible ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by values as high as 95%. Additional positive impacts include reduction in impacts like eutrophication and acidification dangers [19, 48, 62, 135]. Hence, biogas use is a strategy to control environmental problems that include eutrophication, acidification, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions with maximum benefits being realized through proper design and location of biogas systems [135].

Studies show that using biomethane as vehicle fuel can reduce greenhouse gas emission reductions of 27–62% as compared to emissions from conventional natural gas passenger vehicles or 41–70% compared to conventional petrol vehicles. The main challenge is limited suitable biomass to support widespread deployment of power-to-methane systems using biogenic carbon. Available biomethane production options offer attractive means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in a future energy system with large amounts of intermittent renewable power generation [126, 136, 137].

Numerous studies have been undertaken to evaluate the environmental impacts of producing power from biogas from the anaerobic digestion of agricultural products and waste over their entire life cycles. Studies on the anaerobic digestion using tomato waste, maize silage, slurry, and tomato waste as feedstocks and for cogeneration applications suggested that systems using animal slurry offer best options, except for ecotoxicity to marine and terrestrial environment. The studies also indicate that it is more feasible to have smaller plants that use slurry and waste rather than big plants using maize silage to operate efficiently [12, 48, 138]. Electric power from biogas is environmentally more sustainable than grid electricity for many biogas schemes. However, compared to natural gas, biogas electricity is not always the best option in terms of impacts. Biogas also has higher impacts than other renewables, like solar photovoltaics, wind and solar. Overall, though, biogas electricity can help minimize the GHG emissions relative to a fossil-intensive electricity mix, although some other impacts may increase. Further analysis shows that, if the main objective is to mitigate climate change, then other renewables like wind, solar, and hydro offer greater potential to reduce GHG emissions than biogas. However, the environmental sustainability of biogas is much improved by cogeneration when heat is used, especially in terms of global warming potential, summer pollution, and the loss of ozone layer and abiotic resources.

6.3 Biogas in the circular economy

Circular economy refers to an economic concept that is the reverse of the linear system whose main objective is to minimize waste through reuse or recycling. Realizing a circular economy is a challenge for many countries because many biogas plants are generally small energy production facilities, having a smaller impact to waste management [86, 139]. Rural areas have an opportunity to diversify agriculture activities by adding value to the socio-economic systems in additional. Biogas plants should be implemented in a way that properly communicates with local communities to participate in the transformation. The operation of biogas plants is generally compatible with the goals of a circular economy that makes use of local energy resources. Locations for new biogas plants should minimize the need for substrate transport to increase their local character. Successful implementation of largescale biogas systems can help in achieving the Sustainable Development Goal 7 on achieving affordable and clean energy, and Goal 12 on responsible consumption and production [139].

Avoiding open digestate storage reduces methane emissions, and controlling how much of it is dispersed on land reduces ammonia emissions and other negative environmental effects [140]. Figure 3 depicts the layout of a biogas plant in a circular design.

Figure 3.

Functions of biogas in the circular economy.

From Figure 3, the biogas role in the circular economy is presented. The first stage involves the substrate collection and preparation to feed the biodigesters where biogas is produced with digestate as a byproduct.

The traditional scenario model is such that biowastes from agricultural and livestock farming are disposed thus creating a cost for the household or the firm disposing of the waste [30]. In the circular economy scenario, manure and agricultural wastes are used to produce biogas and digestate as fertilizer, which help preserve the environment since biogas energy is an alternative to fossil energy and has socio-economic value to farmers and the biogas producer [30, 86].

Biogas production offers treatment and management of bio digestible animal and plant waste, which sterilizes waste and produces useful manure and sewage leading to significant volume and mass reduction, which effectively reduces the cost of waste treatment and disposal [44, 141, 142]. Use of biogas as a fuel significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions while the use of animal manure as biodigester feedstock reduces methane emissions from the manure storage and use. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from biogas have a lower global warming potential than methane produced by fossil fuel. Therefore, biogas production and use reduce greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the Kyoto protocol and Paris agreements. The negative effect is that reduced use of manure increases use of chemical fertilizers for fertility or nutrient replenishment to the soil [2, 30]. A few of the potential sustainability issues with employing agricultural wastes for biogas production are competition with feeding in animal husbandry and possible loss of nutrients in agricultural land [70].

To consider biogas applications like use as a vehicle fuel as sustainable requires a sustainability criterion to be met along the entire production chain, beginning with primary production to final use and disposal. Sustainability demands that they should not destroy areas of high biological value or generate excessive GHG emissions. For biofuels to decrease greenhouse gas emissions, the sustainability criteria require that the associated greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) emissions over the life cycle should be at least 35% lower compared to fossil fuels [1, 134].

Bio-based economy-enabled technologies lead to green electricity and heat generation and fossil fuel substitution in transport and power generation, and manufacture more value-added products and byproducts. Bio digestion industrial operations, agriculture, and other anthropogenic activities such as food waste (FW) can produce valuable energy sources, nutrient-rich manure, and specialty chemicals. Several anaerobic and microbial interventions sustain biomass valorization and related processes, leading to more efficient bio methanation [85].

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Resource overuse, climate change, and energy autonomy are challenges facing the volatile world. Biogas production and use represents a model example of the circular economy, which is an economy that offers a path for sustainable growth amid growing energy demand and production requirements. Anaerobic digestion is a biological process where biodegradable matter is degraded by the action of microorganisms in absence of oxygen to produce biogas, which is a clean fuel from renewable feedstocks with potential use in heat and electricity generation. Factors affecting bio digestion include type of raw materials, temperature, pH, mixing, level preparation and pretreatment, residence time, redox effect, and hydraulic pressure etc. The efficiency of anaerobic digestion can be evaluated in terms of bio-methane potential, gross energy yields, process energy demand, net energy yield, and energy efficiency. Energy crops are the most used substrate for biogas production.

Concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and depletion of fossil fuels have increased demand for sustainable renewable sources. Biogas production is one of the innovative and viable methods for production of energy from biowastes and biomaterials, with an extra benefit of producing biofertilizer to support sustainable agriculture. Huge quantities of biodegradable waste are generated by humanity globally, which can pose a serious threat to human and animal health and their environment. There are many wastes disposal and treatment methods employed to avoid environmental pollution. Among the many options, anaerobic digestion is a popular non-conventional energy source used to produce renewable energy from biodegradable biomass.

Biogas is a product of the anaerobic digestion process with many applications as in generation of renewable energy. The main component of biogas with energy value is methane, but it has impurities like moisture, carbon dioxide, siloxanes, hydrogen sulfide, siloxanes, hydrocarbons, oxygen, ammonia, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen whose presence is undesirable as they reduce the calorific value of biogas and create operational problems in the energy systems. This necessitates biogas cleaning and application of multi-stage technologies to produce upgraded biogas called biomethane. Biomethane gas is a flexible and easy to store fuel with similar properties and applications to natural gas with no need to modify any equipment settings for natural gas devices and equipment.

The factors influencing the process and quality of biogas produces include the C/N (carbon nitrogen ratio, the pH, dilution of feedstock, composition and nutritive value of feedstock, residence period, mixing and stirring, temperature, presence of toxicants, loading time, and redox conditions. The main challenges facing biogas production and use include lack of technical training on biogas production and use and lack of subsidies and incentives. Therefore, besides easy access to appropriate and affordable biogas technologies, there is a need for developing a comprehensive policy on construction and operation of biodigesters as well as utilization of biogas and sale of biogas energy products and services. Biogas education and exposure, availability of simple and affordable biodigesters, and facilitating legal and policy environment are key tools needed to increase the adoption of biogas technology and its sustainable use.

Raw or cleaned biogas that is free from harmful contaminants has significant energy value and applications. The multifunctional uses of biogas produce include the production of biofuels and renewable energies, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions mainly methane and carbon dioxide, reduction in nuisances resulting from odors and flies associated with uncontrolled biodegrading of biomass, economic or financial savings for farmers, sustainable waste treatment and recycling of organic waste, minimization of water and air pollution, rural poverty alleviation, and better social conditions of rural or remote settlements like gender balance, as women who bear the responsibility of looking for firewood are relieved of the struggle, and conservation of forests and vegetation cover due to reduced use of firewood and charcoal.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Funding

There was no external funding provided for this research and publication charges were paid by the Durban University of Technology.

Advertisement

Consent for publication

The authors have authority to publish research work.

Availability of data

The research has provided all data and information used and did not use any undeclared data and information. However, any datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1. Cook D, Davíðsdóttir B, Kristófersson DM. Energy projects in Iceland – Advancing the case for the use of economic valuation techniques to evaluate environmental impacts. Energy Policy. 2016;94:104-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.044 [Accessed: Jul. 01, 2016]
  2. 2. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Biogas production and applications in the sustainable energy transition. Journal of Energy. 2022;2022(8750221):43. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8750221 [Accessed: Jul. 09, 2022]
  3. 3. Li Y et al. Composition and toxicity of biogas produced from different feedstocks in California. Environmental Science & Technology. 2019;53(19):11569-11579. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03003
  4. 4. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. The potential of grid power generation from municipal solid waste for Nairobi city. In: Presented at the Second African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Harare, Zimbabwe, 5-7 December 2020. 2020. p. 081 [Online]. Available from: http://ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/81.pdf
  5. 5. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Technologies for biogas to electricity conversion. Energy Reports. 2022;8(Supplement 16):774-786. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.007 [Accessed: Dec. 01, 2022]
  6. 6. Moses Jeremiah Barasa K, Oludolapo AO. Biomethane production and applications. In: Sevcan A, editor. Anaerobic Digestion - Biotechnology for Reactor Performance and Environmental Sustainability. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2023 . Ch. 9. p. 45
  7. 7. Huang X, Wang S, Shi Z, Fang L, Yin C. Challenges and strategies for biogas production in the circular agricultural waste utilization model: A case study in rural China. Energy. 2022;241:122889. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122889 [Accessed: Feb. 15, 2022]
  8. 8. Kabeyi MJB. Project and program evaluation consultancy with terms of reference, challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. International Journal of Project Management and Productivity Assessment (IJPMPA). 2020;8(2):47-68. DOI: 10.4018/IJPMPA.2020070103
  9. 9. Singh B et al. Enhancing efficiency of anaerobic digestion by optimization of mixing regimes using helical ribbon impeller. Fermentation. 2021;7(4):251 [Online]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5637/7/4/251
  10. 10. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju O. Slaughterhouse waste to energy in the energy transition with performance analysis and design of slaughterhouse biodigestor. Journal of Energy Management and Technology. 2022;6(3):176-196. DOI: 10.22109/jemt.2021.292954.1309
  11. 11. Kabeyi MJB. Sustainability in the energy transition to renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2022;9:1-45. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114
  12. 12. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Energy and environment: Opportunities and challenges for the energy transition. In: Presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy, July 26–28, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 427 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/427.pdf
  13. 13. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. The role of electrification of transport in the energy transition. In: Presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy, July 26–28, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 426 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/426.pdf
  14. 14. Sahota S et al. Review of trends in biogas upgradation technologies and future perspectives. Bioresource Technology Reports. 2018;1:79-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2018.01.002 [Accessed: Jan 03, 2018]
  15. 15. Abanades S, Abbaspour H, Ahmadi A, Das B, Ehyaei MA, Esmaeilion F, et al. A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2021;19(4):3377-3400. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03301-6 [Accessed: May 16, 2021]
  16. 16. Farzaneh-Gord M, Mohseni-Gharyehsafa B, Arabkoohsar A, Ahmadi MH, Sheremet MA. Precise prediction of biogas thermodynamic properties by using ANN algorithm. Renewable Energy. 2020;147:179-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.112 [Accessed: Jan 03, 2020]
  17. 17. Holliger C, Fruteau de Laclos H, Hack G. Methane production of full-scale anaerobic digestion plants calculated from Substrate’s biomethane potentials compares well with the one measured on-site. Frontiers in Energy Research, Original Research. 2017;5(12):1-9. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2017.00012 [Accessed: Jun. 09, 2017]
  18. 18. Kabeyi M, Olanrewaju O. Performance analysis of a sugarcane bagasse cogeneration power plant in grid electricity generation. In: Presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore, March 7-11, 2021. Michigan, USA: IEOM Society International; 2021 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/201.pdf
  19. 19. Kabeyi M, Olanrewaju O. Preliminary design of a cogeneration plant for a 120 MW diesel engine power plant. In: Presented at the 12th Annual Istanbul International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Istanbul, Turkey, March 7–10, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 411 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022istanbul/411.pdf
  20. 20. IEA. Outlook for biogas and biomethane: Prospects for organic growth. In: International Energy Agency. Paris: IEA; 2020 [Online]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/outlook-for-biogas-and-biomethane-prospects-for-organic-growth/an-introduction-to-biogas-and-biomethane
  21. 21. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Bagasse electricity potential of conventional sugarcane factories. Journal of Energy. 2023;2023:1-25. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5749122 [Accessed: May 19, 2023]
  22. 22. Adnan AI, Ong MY, Nomanbhay S, Chew KW, Show PL. Technologies for biogas upgrading to biomethane: A review. Bioengineering. 2019;6(4):1-23. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/6/4/92
  23. 23. Beegle JR, Borole AP. Energy production from waste: Evaluation of anaerobic digestion and bioelectrochemical systems based on energy efficiency and economic factors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018;96:343-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.057 [Accessed: Nov. 01, 2018]
  24. 24. Salomon KR, Silva Lora EE. Estimate of the electric energy generating potential for different sources of biogas in Brazil. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2009;33(9):1101-1107. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.03.001 [Accessed: Sep. 01, 2009]
  25. 25. Ogunjuyigbe ASO, Ayodele TR, Alao MA. Electricity generation from municipal solid waste in some selected cities of Nigeria: An assessment of feasibility, potential and technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;80:149-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.177 [Accessed: Dec. 01, 2017]
  26. 26. Kumar R, Jilte R, Ahmadi MH. Electricity alternative for e-rickshaws: An approach towards green city. International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise (IJIE). 2018;5(4):333-344. DOI: 10.1504/IJIE.2018.10016762
  27. 27. Achinas S, Achinas V, Euverink GJW. A technological overview of biogas production from biowaste. Engineering. 2017;3(3):299-307. DOI: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.03.002 [Accessed: Jun. 01, 2017]
  28. 28. Pasternak G. Chapter 9 - Electrochemical approach for biogas upgrading. In: Aryal N, Ottosen LDM, Kofoed MVW, Pant D, editors. Emerging Technologies and Biological Systems for Biogas Upgrading. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2021. pp. 223-254
  29. 29. Stevens DJ. Hot gas conditioning: Recent progress with larger-scale biomass gasification systems. In: National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), USA, August 2001. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2001 [Online]. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/786288-hot-gas-conditioning-recent-progress-larger-scale-biomass-gasification-systems-update-summary-recent-progress
  30. 30. Tagne RFT, Dong X, Anagho SG, Kaiser S, Ulgiati S. Technologies, challenges and perspectives of biogas production within an agricultural context. The case of China and Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2021;23(10):14799-14826. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01272-9 [Accessed: Nov. 01, 2021]
  31. 31. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Relationship between electricity consumption and economic development. In: Presented at the International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Cape Town-South Africa, 9–10 December 2021. New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2022 [Online]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9698413
  32. 32. Herz G, Reichelt E, Jahn M. Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas. Energy. 2017;132:370-381. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.102 [Accessed: Aug. 01, 2017]
  33. 33. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA, Akpan J. Biogas production and process control improvements. In: Eduardo J-L, Leila Queiroz Z, Rosangela Rodrigues D, editors. From Biomass to Biobased Products. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2024. p. Ch. 9
  34. 34. Sarkar S et al. Management of crop residues for improving input use efficiency and agricultural sustainability. Sustainability, Review. 2020;12(9808):1-24. DOI: 10.3390/su12239808
  35. 35. Palit D et al. The trials and tribulations of the village energy security programme (VESP) in India. Energy Policy. 2013;57(2013):407-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.006
  36. 36. I.E. Agency. Renewables Information: Overview. International Energy Agency. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-information-overview [Accessed: Sep 30, 2020]
  37. 37. IEA. Global Energy Review 2020. Paris France: International Energy Agency; 2020. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2020/renewables [Accessed: Dec 16, 2020]
  38. 38. Machado PG, Teixeira ACR, Collaço FMA, Mouette D. Review of life cycle greenhouse gases, air pollutant emissions and costs of road medium and heavy-duty trucks. WIREs Energy and Environment. 2021;10(4):1-16. DOI: 10.1002/wene.395
  39. 39. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Preliminary Design of a Bagasse Based Firm Power Plant for a sugar factory. In: Presented at the South African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC), Nortn West University, South Africa, 27–28 January 2021. New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2021. p. 104 [Online]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9377242
  40. 40. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Central versus wellhead power plants in geothermal grid electricity generation. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2021;11(7):1-23. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-021-00283-8. Art no. ESSO-D-20-00011R4
  41. 41. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Geothermal wellhead technology power plants in grid electricity generation: A review. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2022;39:100735. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100735 [Accessed: Jan. 01, 2022]
  42. 42. Kabeyi MJB. Geothermal electricity generation, challenges, opportunities and recommendations. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering (IJASRE). 2019;5(8):53-95. DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE.2019.33408
  43. 43. Lebuhn M, Munk B, Effenberger M. Agricultural biogas production in Germany - from practice to microbiology basics. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2014;4(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/2192-0567-4-10 [Accessed: May 20, 2014]
  44. 44. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Optimization of biogas production for optimal abattoir waste treatment with bio-methanation as solution to Nairobi slaughterhouses waste disposal. In: Presented at the Second African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Harare, Zimbabwe, 5–7 December 2020. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2020. p. 083 [Online]. Available from: http://ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/83.pdf
  45. 45. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Development of a cereal grain drying system using internal combustion engine waste heat. In: Presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, March 7–11, 2021. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2021 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/188.pdf
  46. 46. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. The potential of power generation from municipal solid waste. In: Presented at the Second African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Harare, Zimbabwe, 5–7 December 2020. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2020. p. 081 [Online]. Available from: http://ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/81.pdf
  47. 47. Bond T, Templeton MR. History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2011;15(4):347-354. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.003 [Accessed: Dec. 01, 2011]
  48. 48. Kabeyi M, Olanrewaju O. Diesel powerplants: Design and operation and performance enhancements. In: Presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy, July 26–28, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 425 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/425.pdf
  49. 49. Kabeyi M, Olanrewaju O. Feasibility of conversion from diesel engine to natural gas power plants. In: Presented at the IECON 2022 – 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Brussels, Belgium, 17–20 Oct. 2022. New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2022 [Online]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9968428
  50. 50. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Cogeneration potential of an operating diesel engine power plant. Energy Reports. 2022;8(16):744-754. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.447 [Accessed: Dec. 01, 2022]
  51. 51. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Development of a biogas plant with electricity generation, heating and fertilizer recovery systems. In: Presented at the Second African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Harare, Zimbabwe, 5–7 December 2020. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2020. p. 082 [Online]. Available from: http://ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/82.pdf
  52. 52. Kabeyi M, Olanrewaju O. Development of a cereal grain drying system using internal combustion engine waste heat. In: Presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore, March 7–11, 2021. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2021 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/188.pdf
  53. 53. Barragán-Escandón A, Olmedo Ruiz JM, Curillo Tigre JD, Zalamea-León EF. Assessment of power generation using biogas from landfills in an equatorial tropical context. Sustainability. 2020;12, 7:2669 [Online]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2669
  54. 54. Kabeyi MJB. Sustainability in the energy transition to renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2022;9(743114):1-45. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114
  55. 55. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. A techno-economic assessment of diesel to gas power plant conversion. In: Presented at the 12th Annual Istanbul International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Istanbul, Turkey, March 7–10, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 406 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022istanbul/406.pdf
  56. 56. Arogo J, Ignosh J, Bendfeldt E. Biomethane production technology [Online]. Available from: https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/442/442-881/BSE-240.pdf
  57. 57. Tanigawa S. Biogas: Converting waste to energy. 2017 [Online]. Available from: https://www.eesi.org/files/FactSheet_Biogas_2017.09.pdf
  58. 58. Kabeyi MJB, Olenwaraju AO. Managing sustainability in electricity generation. In: Presented at the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 14–17 December 2020. New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2020. IEEM20-P-0406
  59. 59. Uddin W et al. Biogas potential for electric power generation in Pakistan: A survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;54:25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.083 [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2016]
  60. 60. Ugwu SN, Enweremadu CC. Enhancement of biogas production process from biomass wastes using iron-based additives: Types, impacts, and implications. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects;44(2):4458-4480. DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1788675 [Accessed: Jun. 15, 2022]
  61. 61. Ullah Khan I et al. Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017;150:277-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035 [Accessed: Oct 15, 2017]
  62. 62. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju O. Optimum biodigestor design and operations. In: Presented at the Fifth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy, July 26–28, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 424 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022rome/424.pdf
  63. 63. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Fuel from plastic wastes for sustainable energy transition. In: Presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, March 7–11, 2021. Michigan, USA: IEOM Society International; 2021 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/199.pdf
  64. 64. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Review and design overview of plastic waste-to-pyrolysis oil conversion with implications on the energy transition. Journal of Energy. 2023;2023:1821129. DOI: 10.1155/2023/1821129 [Accessed: May 22, 2023]
  65. 65. Chen B, Hayat T, Alsaedi A.. Biogas systems in China. 2017
  66. 66. Energypedia. Biogas basics. Energypedia. 2020. Available from: https://energypedia.info/wiki/Biogas_Basics [Accessed: Dec. 23, 2020]
  67. 67. Kariuki LN. Indoor carbon Monoxide emission and particulates produced from combustion of carbon based Fuels and their health implications on rural households of Manyatta division, Embu Districts, Kenya [Msc thesis]; Department of environmental Sciences, Kenyatta University. 2009
  68. 68. Kabeyi MJBK, Olanrewaju OA. The use of smart grids in the energy transition. In: 2022 30th Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC), 25–27 Jan. 2022. New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2022. pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/SAUPEC55179.2022.9730635 [Online]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9730635
  69. 69. Farooque M, Leo A, Rauseo A, Wang J-Y. Efficient and ultra-clean use of biogas in the fuel cell - the DFC experience. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2015;5(1):11. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-015-0041-0 [Accessed: Apr. 16, 2015]
  70. 70. Kulichkova GI et al. Plant feedstocks and their biogas production potentials. The Open Agriculture Journal. 2020;2020(14):219-234. DOI: 10.2174/1874331502014010219
  71. 71. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Performance analysis of an open cycle gas turbine power Plant in Grid Electricity Generation. In: Presented at the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, Singapore, 14–17 December 2020. New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2020. IEEM20-P-0438 [Online]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9309840
  72. 72. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Performance analysis of diesel engine power plants for grid electricity supply. In: Presented at the 31ST Annual Southern African Institution for Industrial Engineering Conference, South Africa, 5th – 7th October 2020. Pretoria: Southern African Institution for Industrial Engineering Conference; 2020. p. 4423 [Online]. Available from: https://www.saiie.co.za/system/files/2021-11/SAIIE31%20Conference%20Proceedings.pdf
  73. 73. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Fuel from plastic wastes for sustainable energy transition. In: Presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, March 7–11, 2021. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2021 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/199.pdf
  74. 74. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. The potential of grid power generation from municipal solid waste for Nairobi City. In: Presented at the 2nd African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Harare, Zimbabwe, 5–7 December 2020. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2020. p. 081 [Online]. Available from: http://ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/81.pdf
  75. 75. Das S, Sherpa MT, Najar IN, Thakur N. Biomethane. Environmental Sustainability. 2020;3(4):453. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8307-6_5
  76. 76. Soeder DJ, Borglum SJ. 7 - energy economics. In: Soeder DJ, Borglum SJ, editors. The Fossil Fuel Revolution: Shale Gas and Tight Oil. Washington, D.C., United States: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2019. pp. 213-247
  77. 77. Energypedia. Biogas plant used for power generation.png. Energypedia. 2020. Available from: https://energypedia.info/wiki/Electricity_Generation_from_Biogas [Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020]
  78. 78. Kabeyi MJB. Challenges of implementing thermal powerplant projects in Kenya, the case of Kipevu III 120MW power station, Mombasa Kenya, Masters, Department of Education Management, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, 5866. 2012. [Online]. Available from: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/11023
  79. 79. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. The levelized cost of energy and modifications for use in electricity generation planning. Energy Reports. 2023;9:495-534. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.036 [Accessed: Sep. 01, 2023]
  80. 80. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Smart grid technologies and application in the sustainable energy transition: A review. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2023;42(1):685-758. DOI: 10.1080/14786451.2023.2222298 [Accessed: Dec. 14, 2023]
  81. 81. Ltd NNFCC. Biogas. NNFCC Ltd. Available from: https://www.nnfcc.co.uk/biogas; [Accessed: 2021]
  82. 82. AgSTAR. Anaerobic digester/Biogas system operator guidebook. In: A Guidebook for Operating Anaerobic Digestion/Biogas Systems on Farms in the United States. Washington, D.C., United States: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2020. EPA 430-B-20-003 [Online] Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-11/documents/agstar-operator-guidebook.pdf [Accessed: May 17, 2020]
  83. 83. Akpojaro J, Ofualagba G, Akpojaro MA. Electricity generation from cow dung biogas. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 2019;23(7):1301-1307. DOI: 10.4314/jasem.v23i7.17
  84. 84. Awe OW, Zhao Y, Nzihou A, Minh DP, Lyczko N. A review of biogas utilisation, purification and upgrading technologies review. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2017;8(2):267-283. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-016-9826-4 [Accessed: Mar. 2017]
  85. 85. Singh PK, Mohanty P, Mishra S, Adhya TK. Food waste valorisation for biogas-based bioenergy production in circular bioeconomy: Opportunities, challenges, and future developments. Frontiers in Energy Research, Review. 2022;10:1-13. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg [Accessed: Aug 11, 2020]
  86. 86. Burg V, Rolli C, Schnorf V, Scharfy D, Anspach V, Bowman G. Agricultural biogas plants as a hub to foster circular economy and bioenergy: An assessment using substance and energy flow analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2023;190:106770. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106770 [Accessed: Mar. 01, 2023]
  87. 87. Bhardwaj S, Das P. A review: Advantages and disadvantages of biogas. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 2017;4(10):890-893
  88. 88. Mambeli Barros R, Tiago Filho GL, da Silva TR. The electric energy potential of landfill biogas in Brazil. Energy Policy. 2014;65:150-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.028 [Accessed: Feb. 01, 2014]
  89. 89. Kabeyi M, Olanrewaju O. Slaughterhouse waste to energy in the energy transition with performance analysis and design of slaughterhouse biodigestor. Journal of Energy Management and Technology. 2022;6(3):188-208. DOI: 10.22109/jemt.2021.292954.1309
  90. 90. Asankulova A, Obozov AD. Biogas in Kyrgyzstan. Applied Solar Energy. 2007;43(4):262-265. DOI: 10.3103/S0003701X0704017
  91. 91. Engines for biogas. 1988. 3-528-02032-6 [Online] Available from: https://biogas.ifas.ufl.edu/ad_development/documents/Engines%20for%20biogas.pdf
  92. 92. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Design and modelling of a waste heat recovery system for a 250KW diesel engine for cereals drying. In: Presented at the Second African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Harare, Zimbabwe, December 7–10, 2020. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 78 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/78.pdf
  93. 93. Kabeyi MJB. Feasibility of wellhead technology power plants for electricity generation. International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends. 2020;7(2):1-16. DOI: 10.22362/ijcert/2020/v7/i02/v7i0201
  94. 94. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Biogas treatment and upgrading techniques. In: Presented at the Fourth Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2023 [Online]. Available from: https://index.ieomsociety.org/index.cfm/article/view/ID/13606
  95. 95. Cedigaz. Global biomethane market: green gas goes global. 20 March 2019. Retrieved 24 August 2023. Available from: https://www.cedigaz.org/global-biomethane-market-green-gas-goes-global/
  96. 96. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju O. Diesel to gas engine power plant conversion: A review and preliminary design for an operting power plant. Journal of Energy Management and Technology. 2023;7(2):103-115. DOI: 10.22109/jemt.2022.292982.1312
  97. 97. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Biogas as a sustainable fuel and feedstock: Properties, purification and applications. In: Sevcan A, editor. Anaerobic Digestion - Biotechnology for Reactor Performance and Environmental Sustainability. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2023
  98. 98. Bui VG et al. Flexible syngas-biogas-hydrogen fueling spark-ignition engine behaviors with optimized fuel compositions and control parameters. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48(18):6722-6737. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.133 [Accessed: Feb. 28, 2023]
  99. 99. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Conversion from diesel to dual fuel power generation and implications on the transition. In: Presented at the Seventh North American International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Orlando, Florida, USA June 12–14, 2022, Conference Paper. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 356 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022orlando/356.pdf
  100. 100. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Conversion of diesel and petrol engines to biogas engines as an energy transition strategy. In: Presented at the Fourth African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Nsukka, Nigeria, April 5–7, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 448 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022nigeria/448.pdf
  101. 101. Kukoyi TO, Muzenda E, Akinlabi ET, Mashamba A, Mbohwa C, Mahlatsi T. Biogas use as fuel in spark ignition engines. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 4–7 Dec. 2016. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2016. pp. 1064-1069. DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798041
  102. 102. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Application of geothermal wellhead generators in sustainable power generation. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions. 2022;46(2022):1692-1718. Art no. 1034703. Available from: https://www.geothermal-library.org/index.php?mode=pubs&action=view&record=1034703
  103. 103. Kabeyi MJB, Oludolapo AO. Development of a biogas plant with electricity generation, heating and fertilizer recovery systems. In: Presented at the Second African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM Society International, 5–7 December 2020. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2020. p. 082 [Online]. Available from: http://ieomsociety.org/harare2020/papers/82.pdf
  104. 104. Kour D et al. Technologies for Biofuel Production: Current Development, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Cham: Springer; 2019
  105. 105. Admin A. Green Hydrogen from Biogas. H2 International. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2022. Available from: https://www.h2-international.com/2020/09/15/green-hydrogen-from-biogas/ [Accessed: Jul. 1, 2022]
  106. 106. Karuppiah T, Azariah VE. Biomass Pretreatment for enhancement of biogas production. In: Anaerobic Digestion. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2019
  107. 107. Saur G, Milbrandt A. Renewable hydrogen potential from biogas in the United States. In: NREL of the U.S. Department of Energy, Denver West Parkway, USA, July 2014. 2014 [Online]. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60283.pdf
  108. 108. NaturalGas.org. Natural gas and the environment. NaturalGas.org. Available from: http://naturalgas.org/environment/naturalgas/ [Accessed: 2021]
  109. 109. Antonini C, Treyer K, Streb A, van der, Mijndert S, Bauer C, Mazzo M. Hydrogen production from natural gas and biomethane with carbon capture and storage – A techno-environmental analysis. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2020;2020(4):2967. DOI: 10.1039/D0SE00222D
  110. 110. Fly A, Thring RH. System thermal and water balance in an evaporatively cooled PEM fuel cell vehicle. In: Vehicle Thermal Management Systems Conference Proceedings (VTMS11). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2013. pp. 267-277
  111. 111. Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.: U.S. Department of Energy; 2017. [Online]. Available from: https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2014.html [Accessed: Sep. 26, 2017]
  112. 112. Lyng K-A, Brekke A. Environmental life cycle assessment of biogas as a fuel for transport compared with alternative fuels. Energies. 2019;12(3):532 [Online]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/3/532. [Accessed: Jul 30, 2020]
  113. 113. Li Y. Converting Biogas to Transportation Fuels. Ohio, USA: Ohio State University; 2014 [Online]. Available from: https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/AEX-653.2
  114. 114. Ashraf MT, Schmidt JE, Bastidas Oyanedel JR. Conversion efficiency of biogas to liquids fuels through Fischer-Tropsch process. In: Presented at the 23rd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 2015. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015 [Online]. Available from: http://www.etaflorence.it/proceedings/?detail=11205
  115. 115. Alves HJ, Bley Junior C, Niklevicz RR, Frigo EP, Frigo MS, Coimbra-Araújo CH. Overview of hydrogen production technologies from biogas and the applications in fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38(13):5215-5225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.057 [Accessed: May 01, 2013]
  116. 116. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research, Review. 2022;9(743114):1-45. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114 [Accessed: Mar. 24, 2022]
  117. 117. National Energy Technology Laboratory. 10.2. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Pittsburg, US: National Energy Technology Laboratory; Available from: https://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasifipedia/ftsynthesis [Accessed: 2021]
  118. 118. Dahlgren S. Biogas-based fuels as renewable energy in the transport sector: an overview of the potential of using CBG, LBG and other vehicle fuels produced from biogas. Biofuels, 2022;13(5):587-599. DOI: 10.1080/17597269.2020.1821571
  119. 119. Stephan B. 19 - market development and certification schemes for biomethane. In: Wellinger A, Murphy J, Baxter D, editors. The Biogas Handbook. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2013. pp. 444-462
  120. 120. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Solar energy as a sustainable energy for power generation. In: Presented at the Sixth European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Lisbon, Portugal, July 18–20, 2023. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2023, 244
  121. 121. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Performance analysis and evaluation of ethanol potential of Nzoia sugar company Ltd. Energy Reports. 2022;8(16):787-799. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.006 [Accessed: Dec 01, 2022]
  122. 122. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Performance evaluation of Kipevu-III 120 MW power station and conversion to dual-fuel power plant. Energy Reports. 2022;8(16):800-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.064 [Accessed: Dec. 01, 2022]
  123. 123. Mitzlaff K. Engines for Biogas. Eschborn, Germany: Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 1988. 3-528-02032-6 [Online]. Available from: https://biogas.ifas.ufl.edu/ad_development/documents/Engines%20for%20biogas.pdf [Accessed: Dec. 18, 2020]
  124. 124. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Performance analysis and electricity potential for Nzoia sugar factory. Energy Reports. 2022;8(16):755-764. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.432 [Accessed: Dec. 01, 2022]
  125. 125. Mungut M, Bore J, Kakinyi M. Housing characteristics and household population: Findings from the Kenya demographic and health survey 2014. Pan African Medical Journal. 2018;30:603. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.166.1477
  126. 126. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Electricity and gas potential of abattoir waste. In: Presented at the 12th Annual Istanbul International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey, March 7–10, 2022. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2022. p. 403 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022istanbul/403.pdf
  127. 127. Mathur A, Verma L. Management and Utilization of Biogas Plant Slurry. Udaipur: Himanshu Publications; 1988 [Online]. Available from: https://www.econbiz.de/Record/management-and-utilization-of-biogas-plant-slurry-mathur/10000778141
  128. 128. Li T, Tang D, Li Z, Du J, Zhou T, Jia Y. Development and test of a Stirling engine driven by waste gases for the micro-CHP system. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2012;2012:33-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.020
  129. 129. Arshad M et al. Green electricity generation from biogas of cattle manure: An assessment of potential and feasibility in Pakistan. Frontiers in Energy Research, Original Research;10:1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.911485 [Accessed: Aug. 25, 2022]
  130. 130. Paolini V, Petracchini F, Segreto M, Tomassetti L, Naja N, Cecinato A. Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A;53(10):899-906. DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2018.1459076 [Accessed: Aug. 24, 2018]
  131. 131. Amato A, Tsigkou K, Becci A, Beolchini F, Ippolito NM, Ferella F. Life cycle assessment of biomethane vs. fossil methane production and supply. Energies;16(12). DOI: 10.3390/en16124555
  132. 132. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Environmental impact of energy resources. In: Presented at the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Manila, Phillipines. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2023. p. 612 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2023manila/612.pdf
  133. 133. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Conventional and exergetic life cycle assessment process and applications. In: Presented at the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Manila, Phillipines, March 7–9, 2023. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2023. p. 610 [Online]. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2023manila/610.pdf
  134. 134. Ola E. Environmental Technology Assessment of Natural Gas Compared to Biogas. In: Primoz P, editor. Natural Gas. IntechOpen; 2010. pp. 127-146. DOI: 10.5772/9837
  135. 135. Liu X, Yan Z, Yue ZB. 3.10 - Biogas. In: Moo-Young M, editor. Comprehensive Biotechnology. 2nd ed. Burlington: Academic Press; 2011. pp. 99-114
  136. 136. Zhang X, Witte J, Schildhauer T, Bauer C. Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas with biogas as the carbon source. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 2020;4(3):1427-1436. DOI: 10.1039/C9SE00986H
  137. 137. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju OA. Performance analysis and modification of a slaughterhouse waste biogas plant for biogas and electricity generation. In: Presented at the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Singapore, March 7–11, 2021. Michigan: IEOM Society International; 2021 [Online]. Available from: http://www.ieomsociety.org/singapore2021/papers/203.pdf
  138. 138. Kabeyi MJB, Olanrewaju AO. Smart grid technologies, capabilities and applications in the sustainable energy transition: A review. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 2023;42(1):685-758. DOI: 10.1080/14786451.2023.2222298
  139. 139. Lubańska A, Kazak JK. The role of biogas production in circular economy approach from the perspective of locality. Energies;16(9). DOI: 10.3390/en16093801
  140. 140. Fusi A, Bacenetti J, Fiala M, Azapagic A. Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Original Research. 2016;4:1-17. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00026 [Accessed: Mar. 11, 2016]
  141. 141. Kabeyi MJB. Potential and challenges of bagasse cogeneration in the Kenyan sugar industry. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts. 2022;10(4):379-526. DOI: 10.1729/Journal.30042. Art no. IJCRT_218740
  142. 142. Kabeyi MJB. Investigating the challenges of bagasse cogeneration in the Kenyan sugar industry. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology. 2020;9(5):7-64. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3828855 [Accessed: May, 2020]

Written By

Moses Jeremiah Barasa Kabeyi and Oludolapo Akanni Olanrewaju

Submitted: 16 November 2023 Reviewed: 02 February 2024 Published: 12 June 2024