In East Africa, an estimated 70% of wildlife populations are dispersed outside protected areas on community land. The way of life of the pastoralists, essentially support the thriving of wildlife. However, pastoralism is slowly transiting to more sedentary forms of livestock production. The region‘s wildlife populations future now largely depends on the conservation of habitats and migratory corridors on private and communally owned lands with competing land uses. Community wildlife conservancies are one of the approaches of decentralizing wildlife management and curbing biodiversity and habitat loss at the livestock-wildlife interface environments. Further, conservancies present an avenue for restoration of degraded grazing lands and improving pastoral livelihoods. This paper reviews the community-based conservation unfolding in northern Kenya using the case of Naibung’a Wildlife Conservancy in Laikipia County. Conservancies through land zoning and range rehabilitation have contributed to improved security of wildlife, people and their livestock. Conservancies’ success depends on continued investment in vegetation recovery, grazing management, livestock marketing and benefit sharing. The perceived threats facing conservancies are pasture scarcity, cattle rustling and human-wildlife conflicts. Conservation objectives and human livelihoods in Africa are closely interlinked and lessons learnt in Naibung’a Wildlife Conservancy could particularly be useful to other similar initiatives in Africa.
Part of the book: Wildlife Management
Erosion by water is one of the most common types of soil degradation which occurs in all climatic regions and is widely considered to be a serious threat to the long-term viability of agriculture in many parts of the world. Lake Ol Bolossat in Nyandarua County, Kenya, is a high altitude lake that was formed on Rift Valley escarpment and faces the challenge of siltation due to increased soil erosion. Over the last few decades, the lake has been encroached and lake area has been overgrazed reducing the vegetation cover around the Lake. An assessment of spatial soil erosion loss was conducted using USLE model and GIS which showed that most parts of the Lake catchment have soil loss beyond tolerable levels of nine tons per year. The soil erosion range was between zero and 22, 525.5 tons per year. The land uses that were more vulnerable to soil loss are croplands, grazing lands with sparse vegetation and barelands which had soil loss ranges of 10–50 tons, 100 to 1000 tons and 500 to 22,525.5 tons per year respectively. The study recommended for immediate interventions by policy makers, researchers and development partners in curbing the soil loss problem.
Part of the book: Soil Erosion