Summarization of application of
Abstract
The genus Lactobacillus is a heterogeneous group of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with important implications in biotechnology. It is a predominant microorganism in the world of gastrointestinal health, but various other uses are being explored. They have long been considered in the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) category by the Food and Drug Authority (FDA). They have been extensively used in fermentation and there is growing interest regarding their use in gut health, vaccine production, and biomedical innovation. This chapter highlights the application of lactobacilli in healthcare.
Keywords
- inulin
- gut microbiota
- prebiotic
- sustainability
- fermentation
1. Introduction
Lactic acid-producing bacteria (LAB) are gram-positive, catalase-negative organisms that constitute a diverse group extensively utilized in both medicinal and industrial domains, with the genus
This genus of organisms has garnered substantial recognition, owing to their role as prolific producers of lactic acid. This characteristic not only contributes to their predominance in the microbiota but also aligns with their extensive historical use in fermentation processes. They have existed in civilization throughout centuries in various forms, but their use has become more refined in the modern world. As mentioned earlier, they first started as integral partners in the world of fermentation but have grown to be vital for horticulture and healthcare. The Food and Drug Authority (FDA) has duly acknowledged the
Due to the diverse number of organisms within the genus
2. Role as probiotic and applications in health-related conditions
The human gut is a complex ecosystem teeming with trillions of microorganisms, collectively known as the gut microbiota. Many probiotic bacteria are used for human consumption, the most used species being
Organism/strain | Disorder/disease | Characteristics | References |
---|---|---|---|
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) | Modulation of gut motility, reduction in abdominal pain. Clinical trials by Guglielmetti et al. demonstrated significant alleviation of IBS symptoms. | [4, 5, 6, 7] | |
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) | Anti-inflammatory properties, maintenance of gut barrier. Prophylactic efficacy against pouchitis in a double-blind trial by Gionchetti et al. | [4, 5, 7, 8] | |
Infectious diarrhea | Competitive exclusion of pathogens, antimicrobial activity. Effective in reducing antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. | [4, 9, 10, 11] | |
Necrotizing enterocolitis | Gut barrier protection, immunomodulation. Lower incidence in very low birth weight infants treated with | [4, 7, 12, 13] | |
Immune modulation | Regulation of immune responses, cytokine modulation. Enhances influenza vaccination effects. | [4, 14, 15, 16] | |
Microbiome balance | Competition with pathogenic bacteria, microbiome modulation. Effective in managing functional abdominal pain in children. | [4, 17, 18, 19] | |
Antimicrobial properties | Production of bacteriocins, inhibition of pathogenic growth. | [9, 20, 21, 22] |
In addition to their antimicrobial properties,
Furthermore,
Cirrhosis affects over 160 million people and results in more than 1.3 million deaths a year [33]. It has been shown that the occurrence and progression of cirrhosis are associated with systemic inflammatory changes, which the gut microbiome contributes to [34]. A systemic review of 17 studies among cirrhotic patients with different degrees of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) compared probiotics versus placebo. These studies showed significant improvement in neurophysiological status and ammonia levels with probiotic use, most significantly with a combination containing
The capacity of
In humans, the gastrointestinal tract supports trillions of microbial cells creating an ecosystem that is unique to each person. As research in the field of probiotics advances, the exploration of personalized probiotic interventions based on individual microbiome composition is becoming an exciting avenue for future applications [38]. Understanding the unique interactions between
The genus
3. Lactobacillus-based vaccination strategies
Vaccination is one of the most effective public health strategies and stands as a cornerstone in the arsenal to combat infectious diseases. Researchers are exploring innovative methods to bolster its efficacy. Among these approaches is the utilization of live bacteria as vectors for the delivery of vaccine antigens directly to the immune system. LAB have emerged as promising candidates as potential bacterial carriers of compounds with prophylactic and therapeutic effects, due to their long-standing use as starter strains in food and fermentation processes, coupled with their GRAS status conferred by the FDA [39]. This designation ensures that LAB are nonpathogenic, and their application is safe for human and animal consumption; thus, making them safe and ideal vehicles for mucosal vaccination. Most infections occur primarily by targeting mucosal surfaces and hence, stimulating a local immune response at these sites can effectively block pathogen entry. Immunization via the mucosal route is simpler than standard injections and live bacterial vaccines can induce mucosal as well as systemic immune responses when delivered via mucosal routes [40]. This is attributed to their capacity to elicit antigen-specific secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) response [41], which promotes the entrapment of antigens and microorganisms within the mucus layer. Certain strains can adhere to the intestinal epithelium, which makes them an attractive candidate as bacterial carriers, while other strains have properties that allow them to enhance the immune response caused by the carrier antigens. Their ability to be stored at room temperature via lyophilization also allows for delivery worldwide.
So far,
Expanding beyond bacterial infections, LAB-based vaccines have shown promise against viral and parasitic diseases. For instance, recombinant
Malaria is a global parasitic disease that remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the developing world. Zhang et al. showed that
The ability of LAB to be used for heterologous protein delivery is not limited to infectious disease but can also be expanded to certain non-infectious conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Studies employing
Moreover, LAB have been investigated for their ability to deliver DNA vaccines, offering a versatile platform for immunization. DNA immunization leads to both a cellular and humoral immune response, and the use of live bacteria for DNA delivery has been studied for over 20 years. Initial studies of lactobacilli in cow milk allergy, which affects 2–3% of infants and young children, were with
While much of the current research focuses on
4. Biomedical uses and therapeutic potential
Recent research has highlighted the role of LAB as catalysts in the formation of functional peptides, unveiling a potential avenue for their utilization in various medical applications. It has been observed that many proteins present in food matrices exist as inactive metabolites, inhibited from exerting their biological activities due to structural constraints imposed by surrounding compounds. The action of LAB in cleaving these bonds can liberate bioactive peptides, facilitating a range of physiological effects. Various studies have identified specific peptide sequences within proteins such as albumin, β-lactoglobulin, and α-lactalbumin in whey, which exhibit anti-hypertensive properties. The operational ingredient in these substances functions primarily through the inhibition of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) activity, thereby modulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system contributing to the reduction of blood pressure levels [62]. Studies have shown that when LAB like
Furthermore, the addition of
Beyond their effects on cardiovascular health, lactobacilli have also been found to produce various metabolic by-products, including biosurfactants, which hold promise in combating pathogenic infections. Biosurfactants may play a role in reducing the adherence capacity of several pathogens, a crucial step for biofilm formation and proliferation, through the mechanism of competitive exclusion [67]. These biosurfactant molecules are also advantageous over their synthetic counterparts due to decreased toxicity and increased biodegradability, rendering them attractive candidates for medical applications. Gan et al. showed that
The multifaceted biochemical activities of lactobacilli and their metabolic by-products offer promising avenues for medical interventions and food industry innovations aimed at enhancing health outcomes. Further research into the mechanisms underlying these effects and their translation into practical applications is warranted to fully harness the therapeutic potential of LAB-derived compounds.
5. Challenges and outlook of Lactobacillus applications
Despite their numerous applications, several challenges persist in harnessing the full potential of lactobacilli. A crucial hurdle lies in comprehending the intricate interplay between lactobacilli and the human microbiome, especially concerning their efficacy as probiotics. The applications of lactic acid bacteria, shedding light on strategies against food spoilage microorganisms and foodborne pathogens, have been emphasized [2]. One of the foremost challenges in utilizing lactobacilli is ensuring their survival and viability during processing and storage. Factors such as pH, temperature, oxygen exposure, and interactions with other microorganisms could influence the stability of the lactobacilli. To address this issue, strategies like microencapsulation, freeze-drying, and selection of robust strains to enhance their survival rate are being explored [71]. Harnessing lactobacilli for health-related applications presents challenges in ensuring standardized production methodology and quality control measures to ensure their survival through the gastrointestinal tract. Variability in strain characteristics, fermentation conditions, and manufacturing processes can impact the efficacy and safety of
In spite of the growing interest in probiotics, including lactobacilli, clinical evidence supporting their efficacy in specific medical conditions remains inconclusive. Challenges in designing rigorous clinical trials, including appropriate endpoints, patient selection criteria, and standardized intervention protocols, hinder the assessment of the efficacy of LAB. While lactobacilli exhibit various functional properties, including antimicrobial activity, immune modulation, and production of bioactive compounds, optimizing these properties for practical applications remains a challenge. Due to this, a deeper understanding of the immunomodulatory effects of lactobacilli is pivotal for enhancing therapeutic potential in the therapy of and optimizing clinical outcomes in inflammatory and infectious conditions [1, 23]. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these functions and their interaction with host systems is essential for enhancing their efficacy in functional foods and therapeutic interventions. Additionally, exploration into biocontrol agents against fungal diseases demands comprehensive insights into lactobacilli’s antifungal activity [26]. Their role as vectors for mucosal vaccination faces challenges in optimizing the delivery of vaccine antigens. Exploration of their ecological role in the gastrointestinal tract aligns with ongoing efforts to develop strains capable of efficient antigen expression and delivery [27, 58, 60, 61].
The lack of clear guidelines and standardized criteria for evaluating probiotic safety and efficacy complicates the regulatory approval process. Streamlining regulatory procedures and establishing evidence-based criteria for probiotic evaluation are necessary to facilitate the translation of
While there are several challenges, the outlook for
6. Conclusion
In conclusion, the exploration of lactobacilli applications in healthcare and biomedical industries reveals a multifaceted landscape rich with promise, yet riddled with challenges. LAB, particularly lactobacilli, have emerged as versatile organisms with diverse applications, ranging from probiotics to vaccine delivery systems and beyond. Their historical use in food fermentation, coupled with their safety profile and regulatory approval, has paved the way for their integration into various medical interventions.
The role of lactobacilli as probiotics, particularly in gastrointestinal health, is well-established. Their ability to regulate immune responses, inhibit pathogenic overgrowth, and maintain gut barrier integrity underscores their importance in addressing health-related conditions, encompassing gastrointestinal disorders and infectious diseases. Additionally, the prospect of personalized probiotic interventions, tailored to individual microbiome compositions, opens new avenues for customized therapeutic approaches. This is particularly noteworthy in the context of cirrhosis, where recent evidence suggests that the systemic inflammatory changes associated with cirrhosis, influenced by the gut microbiome, can be effectively mitigated with probiotic supplementation.
Lactobacilli-based vaccination strategies present an innovative approach to enhance vaccine efficacy, particularly through mucosal delivery systems. Studies demonstrate their effectiveness against a wide range of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, showcasing their versatility and potential in immunoprophylaxis.
In biomedical applications, lactobacilli show promise in catalyzing the formation of functional peptides with various physiological effects, from anti-hypertensive properties to cholesterol-lowering effects. Additionally, their production of metabolic by-products like biosurfactants holds potential in combating infections and promoting health outcomes.
However, challenges persist in harnessing the full potential of lactobacilli. Ensuring their survival and viability during processing and storage, standardizing production methodologies, and addressing variability in strain characteristics pose significant hurdles. Moreover, the lack of clear guidelines for evaluating probiotic safety and efficacy complicates regulatory approval processes.
Despite these challenges, the outlook for
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.
Ryan J, Narasimha S, Pattison R, Zackria R, Ghobrial Y, Abdul Basit S, et al. Translation of immunomodulatory effects of probiotics into clinical practice. In: Vasudeo Z, Mohd Fadhil Md D, Puja G, Bhupendra Gopalbhai P, editors. Advances in Probiotics for Health and Nutrition. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2023. p. Ch. 8 - 2.
Mokoena MP, Omatola CA, Olaniran AO. Applications of lactic acid bacteria and their Bacteriocins against food spoilage microorganisms and foodborne pathogens. Molecules. 2021; 26 (22):7055 - 3.
Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus : Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genusLactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union ofLactobacillaceae andLeuconostocaceae . International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2020;70 (4):2782-2858 - 4.
Reid G, Sanders ME, Gaskins HR, Gibson GR, Mercenier A, Rastall R, et al. New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 2003; 37 (2):105-118 - 5.
Guglielmetti S, Mora D, Gschwender M, Popp K. Randomised clinical trial: Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 significantly alleviates irritable bowel syndrome and improves quality of life--A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2011; 33 (10):1123-1132 - 6.
Hoveyda N, Heneghan C, Mahtani KR, Perera R, Roberts N, Glasziou P. A systematic review and meta-analysis: Probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterology. 2009; 9 :15 - 7.
O'Toole PW, Marchesi JR, Hill C. Next-generation probiotics: The spectrum from probiotics to live biotherapeutics. Nature Microbiology. 2017; 2 :17057 - 8.
Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Helwig U, Venturi A, Lammers KM, Brigidi P, et al. Prophylaxis of pouchitis onset with probiotic therapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124 (5):1202-1209 - 9.
Hammes WP, Hertel C. The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E, editors. The Prokaryotes: Volume 4: Bacteria: Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria. US: Springer; 2006. pp. 320-403. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-30744-3_10 - 10.
Szajewska H, Canani RB, Guarino A, Hojsak I, Indrio F, Kolacek S, et al. Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. 2016; 62 (3):495-506 - 11.
Vanderhoof JA, Whitney DB, Antonson DL, Hanner TL, Lupo JV, Young RJ. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1999;135 (5):564-568 - 12.
Lin HC, Su BH, Chen AC, Lin TW, Tsai CH, Yeh TF, et al. Oral probiotics reduce the incidence and severity of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2005; 115 (1):1-4 - 13.
Manzoni P, Rinaldi M, Cattani S, Pugni L, Romeo MG, Messner H, et al. Bovine lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of late-onset sepsis in very low-birth-weight neonates: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2009; 302 (13):1421-1428 - 14.
Olivares M, Díaz-Ropero MP, Sierra S, Lara-Villoslada F, Fonollá J, Navas M, et al. Oral intake of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 enhances the effects of influenza vaccination. Nutrition. 2007;23 (3):254-260 - 15.
Isolauri E, Arvola T, Sütas Y, Moilanen E, Salminen S. Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 2000; 30 (11):1604-1610 - 16.
Rizzello V, Bonaccorsi I, Dongarrà ML, Fink LN, Ferlazzo G. Role of natural killer and dendritic cell crosstalk in immunomodulation by commensal bacteria probiotics. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology. 2011; 2011 :473097 - 17.
Corsetti A, Settanni L. Lactobacilli in sourdough fermentation. Food Research International. 2007; 40 (5):539-558 - 18.
Francavilla R, Miniello V, Magistà AM, De Canio A, Bucci N, Gagliardi F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of Lactobacillus GG in children with functional abdominal pain. Pediatrics. 2010;126 (6):e1445-e1452 - 19.
Valeur N, Engel P, Carbajal N, Connolly E, Ladefoged K. Colonization and immunomodulation by Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 in the human gastrointestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2004;70 (2):1176-1181 - 20.
van Zyl WF, Deane SM, Dicks LMT. Molecular insights into probiotic mechanisms of action employed against intestinal pathogenic bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2020; 12 (1):1831339 - 21.
Salminen MK, Rautelin H, Tynkkynen S, Poussa T, Saxelin M, Valtonen V, et al. Lactobacillus bacteremia, clinical significance, and patient outcome, with special focus on probioticL. rhamnosus GG . Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004;38 (1):62-69 - 22.
Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP. Bacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2005; 3 (10):777-788 - 23.
Parvez S, Malik KA, Ah Kang S, Kim HY. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2006; 100 (6):1171-1185 - 24.
Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2014; 11 (8):506-514 - 25.
Prete R, Alam MK, Perpetuini G, Perla C, Pittia P, Corsetti A. Lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides producers: A sustainable tool for functional foods. Food. 2021; 10 (7):1653 - 26.
Delcenserie V, Martel D, Lamoureux M, Amiot J, Boutin Y, Roy D. Immunomodulatory effects of probiotics in the intestinal tract. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2008; 10 (1-2):37-54 - 27.
Walter J. Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: Implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008; 74 (16):4985-4996 - 28.
Taverniti V, Guglielmetti S. The immunomodulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: proposal of paraprobiotic concept). Genes & Nutrition. 2011; 6 (3):261-274 - 29.
Maldonado Galdeano C, Cazorla SI, Lemme Dumit JM, Vélez E, Perdigón G. Beneficial effects of probiotic consumption on the immune system. Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism. 2019; 74 (2):115-124 - 30.
Kalliomäki M, Salminen S, Poussa T, Arvilommi H, Isolauri E. Probiotics and prevention of atopic disease: 4-year follow-up of a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003; 361 (9372):1869-1871 - 31.
Alander M, Satokari R, Korpela R, Saxelin M, Vilpponen-Salmela T, Mattila-Sandholm T, et al. Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG , after oral consumption. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65 (1):351-354 - 32.
Hojsak I, Snovak N, Abdović S, Szajewska H, Misak Z, Kolacek S. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections in children who attend day care centers: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition. 2010;29 (3):312-316 - 33.
Collaborators GC. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020; 5 (3):245-266 - 34.
Trebicka J, Bork P, Krag A, Arumugam M. Utilizing the gut microbiome in decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2021; 18 (3):167-180 - 35.
Bajaj JS, Saeian K, Christensen KM, Hafeezullah M, Varma RR, Franco J, et al. Probiotic yogurt for the treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2008; 103 (7):1707-1715 - 36.
Pratap Mouli V, Benjamin J, Bhushan Singh M, Mani K, Garg SK, Saraya A, et al. Effect of probiotic VSL#3 in the treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Hepatology Research. 2015; 45 (8):880-889 - 37.
Yang X, Lei L, Shi W, Li X, Huang X, Lan L, et al. Probiotics are beneficial for liver cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Frontiers in Medicine. 2024; 11 :1379333 - 38.
Lynch SV, Pedersen O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2016; 375 (24):2369-2379 - 39.
Salminen S, von Wright A, Morelli L, Marteau P, Brassart D, de Vos WM, et al. Demonstration of safety of probiotics -- A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1998; 44 (1-2):93-106 - 40.
Mielcarek N, Alonso S, Locht C. Nasal vaccination using live bacterial vectors. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2001; 51 (1-3):55-69 - 41.
Neutra MR, Kozlowski PA. Mucosal vaccines: The promise and the challenge. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2006; 6 (2):148-158 - 42.
Mercenier A, Müller-Alouf H, Grangette C. Lactic acid bacteria as live vaccines. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2000; 2 (1):17-25 - 43.
Iwaki M, Okahashi N, Takahashi I, Kanamoto T, Sugita-Konishi Y, Aibara K, et al. Oral immunization with recombinant Streptococcus lactis carrying the Streptococcus mutans surface protein antigen gene. Infection and Immunity. 1990; 58 (9):2929-2934 - 44.
Wells JM, Wilson PW, Norton PM, Gasson MJ, Le Page RWF. Lactococcus lactis: High-level expression of tetanus toxin fragment C and protection against lethal challenge. Molecular Microbiology. 1993; 8 (6):1155-1162 - 45.
Hanniffy SB, Carter AT, Hitchin E, Wells JM. Mucosal delivery of a pneumococcal vaccine using Lactococcus lactis affords protection against respiratory infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2007; 195 (2):185-193 - 46.
Gu Q , Song D, Zhu M. Oral vaccination of mice against Helicobacter pylori with recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing urease subunit B. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2009; 56 (3):197-203 - 47.
Corthésy B, Boris S, Isler P, Grangette C, Mercenier A. Oral immunization of mice with lactic acid bacteria producing Helicobacter pylori urease B subunit partially protects against challenge with Helicobacter felis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005; 192 (8):1441-1449 - 48.
Bosch FX, Manos MM, Muñoz N, Sherman M, Jansen AM, Peto J, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: A worldwide perspective. International biological study on cervical cancer (IBSCC) study group. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1995; 87 (11):796-802 - 49.
Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Cortes-Perez NG, Lefèvre F, Guimarães V, Rabot S, Alcocer-Gonzalez JM, et al. A novel mucosal vaccine based on live Lactococci expressing E7 antigen and IL-12 induces systemic and mucosal immune responses and protects mice against human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumors. Journal of Immunology. 2005; 175 (11):7297-7302 - 50.
Wyatt R, Sullivan N, Thali M, Repke H, Ho D, Robinson J, et al. Functional and immunologic characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins containing deletions of the major variable regions. Journal of Virology. 1993; 67 (8):4557-4565 - 51.
Xin KQ , Hoshino Y, Toda Y, Igimi S, Kojima Y, Jounai N, et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of orally administered recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing surface-bound HIV Env. Blood. 2003; 102 (1):223-228 - 52.
Zhang ZH, Jiang PH, Li NJ, Shi M, Huang W. Oral vaccination of mice against rodent malaria with recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing MSP-1(19). World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005; 11 (44):6975-6980 - 53.
Tarahomjoo S. Development of vaccine delivery vehicles based on lactic acid bacteria. Molecular Biotechnology. 2012; 51 (2):183-199 - 54.
Strukelj B, Perse M, Ravnikar M, Lunder M, Cerar A, Berlec A. Improvement in treatment of experimental colitis in mice by using recombinant Lactococcus lactis with surface-displayed affibody against TNFα (THER4P.889). The Journal of Immunology. 2014; 192 (Suppl. 1):137.1-137.1 - 55.
Steidler L, Hans W, Schotte L, Neirynck S, Obermeier F, Falk W, et al. Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. Science. 2000; 289 (5483):1352-1355 - 56.
Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Motta JP, Aubry C, Kharrat P, Rous-Martin L, Sallenave JM, et al. Serine protease inhibitors protect better than IL-10 and TGF-β anti-inflammatory cytokines against mouse colitis when delivered by recombinant Lactococci. Microbial Cell Factories. 2015; 14 :26 - 57.
Saraiva DLT, Morais K, Pereira BV, Azevedo DM, Rocha SC, Prosperi CC, et al. Milk fermented with a 15-Lipoxygenase-1-producing Lactococcus Lactis alleviates symptoms of colitis in a murine model. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2015; 16 (5):424-429 - 58.
Guimarães VD, Innocentin S, Lefèvre F, Azevedo V, Wal JM, Langella P, et al. Use of native Lactococci as vehicles for delivery of DNA into mammalian epithelial cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006; 72 (11):7091-7097 - 59.
Chatel JM, Pothelune L, Ah-Leung S, Corthier G, Wal JM, Langella P. In vivo transfer of plasmid from food-grade transiting Lactococci to murine epithelial cells. Gene Therapy. 2008; 15 (16):1184-1190 - 60.
Pontes D, Innocentin S, Del Carmen S, Almeida JF, Leblanc JG, de Moreno de Leblanc A, et al. Production of fibronectin binding protein a at the surface of Lactococcus lactis increases plasmid transfer in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2012; 7 (9):e44892 - 61.
Innocentin S, Guimarães V, Miyoshi A, Azevedo V, Langella P, Chatel JM, et al. Lactococcus lactis expressing either Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein A or Listeria monocytogenes internalin A can efficiently internalize and deliver DNA in human epithelial cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009; 75 (14):4870-4878 - 62.
Daliri EB, Lee BH, Park BJ, Kim SH, Oh DH. Antihypertensive peptides from whey proteins fermented by lactic acid bacteria. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2018; 27 (6):1781-1789 - 63.
Nonaka A, Nakamura T, Hirota T, Matsushita A, Asakura M, Ohki K, et al. The milk-derived peptides Val-Pro-Pro and Ile-Pro-Pro attenuate arterial dysfunction in L-NAME-treated rats. Hypertension Research. 2014; 37 (8):703-707 - 64.
Ma C, Zhang S, Lu J, Zhang C, Pang X, Lv J. Screening for cholesterol-lowering probiotics from lactic acid bacteria isolated from corn silage based on three hypothesized pathways. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20 (9):2073 - 65.
Tsai CC, Lin PP, Hsieh YM, Zhang ZY, Wu HC, Huang CC. Cholesterol-lowering potentials of lactic acid bacteria based on bile-salt hydrolase activity and effect of potent strains on cholesterol metabolism in vitro and in vivo. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; 2014 :690752 - 66.
Miremadi F, Ayyash M, Sherkat F, Stojanovska L. Cholesterol reduction mechanisms and fatty acid composition of cellular membranes of probiotic Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. Journal of Functional Foods. 2014; 9 :295-305 - 67.
Satpute SK, Kulkarni GR, Banpurkar AG, Banat IM, Mone NS, Patil RH, et al. Biosurfactant/s from Lactobacilli species: Properties, challenges and potential biomedical applications. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2016; 56 (11):1140-1158 - 68.
Gan BS, Kim J, Reid G, Cadieux P, Howard JC. Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 inhibits Staphylococcus aureus infection of surgical implants in rats. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002; 185 (9):1369-1372 - 69.
Ceresa C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Nollo G, Cavallo M, Rinaldi M, et al. Inhibition of Candida albicans adhesion on medical-grade silicone by a Lactobacillus -derived biosurfactant. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2015;118 (5):1116-1125 - 70.
Scillato M, Spitale A, Mongelli G, Privitera GF, Mangano K, Cianci A, et al. Antimicrobial properties of Lactobacillus cell-free supernatants against multidrug-resistant urogenital pathogens. Microbiology. 2021;10 (2):e1173 - 71.
Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR. Invited review: The scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. Journal of Dairy Science. 2001;84 (2):319-331