The interaction between mycorrhiza, zinc, and different levels of saline water in CAT enzyme (unit g. protein−1 fresh weight) of wheat crop.
Abstract
Mycorrhizae play a vital role in providing plants with essential macro and micro-mineral elements and protecting them from pathogen infections. Enhancing the plant’s resistance to environmental stress like drought, salinity, and heavy metals, along with enhancing soil structure through the secretion of glycoprotein compounds known as Glumalin, are some benefits. Additionally, plants treated with mineral nanoparticles and mycorrhiza exhibit improved growth, yield, and biochemical characteristics. Also, the plants treated with mineral nanoparticles and mycorrhiza showed better growth, yield, and biochemical properties. Mycorrhiza can also be used as a base material for the synthesis of nanoparticles under green synthesis mode. Thus, nanotechnology and biofertilization are steps friendly environmental.
Keywords
- nanofertilizers
- mycorrhizae
- micro-mineral elements
- bio fertilization
- green-nanotechnology
1. Introduction
Mycorrhizae are fungi that form a symbiotic benign relationship with higher plants [1]. These associations vary widely in functions and structure, and there are several types of mycorrhizae, but the most abundant is arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) [2]. It can supply nutrients to plants, even when levels are low in the soil, particularly vital nutrients like phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), as well as other elements like copper, zinc, and iron. In return, plants allocate 10–20% of their photosynthesis to fungi—mycorrhizae shield roots from harmful fungi in the soil. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can establish a symbiotic bond with 85% of plant families, contributing significantly to ecosystem sustainability [3]. AM fungi are obligate mutualists belonging to the phylum Glomeromycota [4]. Fungal hyphae enter root epidermal cells and proceed to cortex cells, where they form vesicles, arbuscles, and coils, establishing a network of hyphae outside the root (extra-radical hyphae) that enhances soil texture and water relations within the plant’s root system [5]. AM fungi produce a type of glycoprotein named Glyoxalin, which contributes to alleviating soil degradation and inoculating plants. AM fungi give them the ability to withstand extreme conditions of salinity, drought, temperature, and lack of mineral nutrients [6]. With these good qualities, mycorrhizae have entered organic agriculture, but they are insufficient and unrewarding in all regions and under all circumstances, and other supplements must be used, such as mineral and organic fertilizers, in addition to all types of control against diseases and insects. Nanotechnology has entered every detail of life, including agriculture, to benefit from its potential to solve many problems of environmental pollution, lack of nutritional elements and minerals, and increasing production and yields. Both humans and plants need nutritional elements for growth and development, and these elements are absorbed through the root plants and transported to all parts of the plant, so that humans can eat them as suitable food [1].
In pea plants, the synergistic activity between nanoparticles and mycorrhizae caused rising of acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, catalase, and peroxidase as biochemical parameters. The combination that is used is Nano-ZnFe2O4 and arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM), in addition to improving N, P, K, and Mg uptakes [2]. The coupling between ZnFe2O4 NPs and AM fungi in nano agricultural applications Improved the physiological, growth, and biochemical parameters of pea plants [3]. The use of nanofoliar fertilizers and nanofertilizers extracted from marine organisms with mycorrhizal fungi enhanced the nutrient concentration, growth, and production yield of wheat [4]. The combined application of foliar spray AM fungi (250 g inoculum/vine) and seaweed extract (1%) with nano-zinc oxide particles (50 ppm) three times after the bud burst stage on sweet grapevines resulted in improved vegetable growth traits, nutritional status, yield, and cluster quality attributes. The interaction between mycorrhizae, nanocomposites, and their challenges, particularly in combating various microorganisms like fungi, will be the central focus of this chapter, highlighting both the challenges and advantages.
2. Management of drought stress using nanofertilizers and mycorrhizae
In arid and semi-arid regions, successive droughts resulting from climate change have led to abiotic stress, causing poor plant growth and low productivity [7]. Lack of soil moisture can have limitation effects on hydraulic and nutritional conductivity, especially phosphorus (P), potassium (K), nitrogen (N), ionic balance, and gas exchange; it damages photosynthetic pigments and reduces the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) [8, 9, 10]. In addition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced and can damage cell structures such as carbohydrates, nucleic acids, lipids, and proteins and alter their functions, creating oxidative stress [11]. To maintain a plant’s water balance, stomata arrange leaf diffusive conductance to control the flow of gases between the stomatal aperture leaf and the atmosphere, reducing the diffusion of carbon dioxide (CO2), leading to a decline in photosynthetic performances and chlorophyll pigment concentration, as well as accumulation of primary metabolites such as soluble sugars and proteins [12]. For these reasons, the combination of plants and AM fungi could be an appropriate strategy for the sustainable management of aridity stress. In pot experiments, wheat plants (
3. Reducing salinity stress using nanomaterials and mycorrhizae
Salt stress is a pioneer agricultural trouble all over the world; reducing salinity stress using nanomaterials and mycorrhizae has an effect on the functioning of growth and physiology of crop plants [20]. Soil salinity affects the rate of plant growth by reducing the rate of photosynthesis and stomatal conductivity and inhibiting antioxidant enzymes [21]. Under salinity stress conditions, using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) enhances crop plant growth and physiological performance, increasing plant biomass, photosynthetic activity, water potential, and selective uptake of nutrients [22]. As a response to salinity stress, AMF increases antioxidant defense mechanisms and promotes salinity tolerance in crop plants [23]. AMF plays an important role in plant cell osmotic balance by regulating the Na and K ratio and enhancing the synthesis of many osmolytes such as proline and glycine betaine [24]. AM fungi may be able to keep plant cells from salt stress, but there is a decline in propagule production and AM colonization under high salinity conditions [25]. Therefore, the combination of nanoparticles and AMF resolved the problem, and the AMF community co-occurrence network complexity was enhanced by silver nanoparticle AgNPs [26]. To improve production under salinity conditions, it is recommended to use nano-zinc oxide and mycorrhizae [27]. In the salinity condition, the interaction between nano-zinc oxide and AM fungi showed significantly increased K+, reduced Na+ uptake, and increased wheat yield [28]. In addition, watering the wheat plant with different levels of salt water may have an effect on the physiological properties and yield, but the use of the interaction between mineral and nano-zinc and mycorrhizal fungi improved the physiological properties, yield, concentration of some nutrients, the K/Na ratio, and the protein percentage in the crop grains [29]. The combination of nano-zinc fertilizer and mycorrhizae has a notable impact on the activity of (CAT), (SOD), and (POD) enzymes when exposed to varying levels of saline water during irrigation. This impact becomes more pronounced as the salinity levels in the irrigation water rise (Tables 1–3) [30]. In a greenhouse environment, silicon nanoparticles (Si-NPs) at different concentrations (0, 30, and 60 mg/L) along with various biofertilizers were examined for their potential to enhance wheat’s resistance to salinity stress by evaluating antioxidant activity. The study involved different salt concentrations (0, 35, 70, and 105 mM), and the outcomes indicated that bio-fertilizers and Si-NPs boosted parameters, including plant leaf water potential, soluble protein, soluble sugar, catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase levels. The application of both single and combined bio-fertilizers with Si-NPs showed improvements in physiological aspects such as stomatal conductance, electrical conductivity, electrolytic leakage, and proline content. Furthermore, the use of Si-NPs and bio-fertilizers led to increased wheat grain yield under salinity stress conditions by enhancing physiological and biochemical characteristics. The most favorable results in terms of grain yield and reduced malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels were observed with the combined application of biofertilizers and Si-NPs at a concentration of 60 mg/L under normal salinity levels [31]. Salinity stress limits crop production. The use of silicon dioxide nanoparticles (SiO2-NPs) along with the inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with wheat helps mitigate the negative impacts of salinity stress. This combined approach enhances physiological parameters such as leaf area index, chlorophyll fluorescence, anthocyanin, and chlorophyll index. Coinoculation of AMF and PGPR, along with 60 mg/L SiO2-NPs, leads to improved Si, P, and K+ uptake, reduced Na+ uptake, and ultimately, increased grain yield [32].
Mycorrhiza M (20 g/pot) | Type of zinc Zn (15 mg L−1) | Salinity levels of irrigation water S (dS m−1) | Average of mycorrhiza | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | ||||
M0 | Zn0 | 4.97 | 4.80 | 6.11 | 10.19 | 6.19 | |
Zn1 | 3.70 | 4.23 | 4.78 | 7.86 | |||
Zn2 | 3.89 | 6.88 | 8.52 | 8.36 | |||
M1 | Zn0 | 5.03 | 5.35 | 8.60 | 8.80 | 7.03 | |
Zn1 | 3.67 | 6.48 | 9.16 | 8.93 | |||
Zn2 | 4.89 | 6.62 | 7.39 | 9.41 | |||
Salinity levels of irrigation rate | 4.36 | 5.73 | 7.43 | 8.92 | |||
Zinc rate | Zn0 | Zn1 | Zn2 | ||||
6.73 | 6.10 | 7.00 | |||||
M. Zn | Zn0 | Zn1 | Zn2 | ||||
M0 | 6.52 | 5.14 | 6.91 | ||||
M1 | 6.95 | 7.06 | 7.08 | ||||
M. S | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | |||
M0 | 4.19 | 5.30 | 6.47 | 8.80 | |||
M1 | 4.53 | 6.15 | 8.38 | 9.05 | |||
S. Zn | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | |||
Zn0 | 5.00 | 5.07 | 7.35 | 9.49 | |||
Zn1 | 3.68 | 5.36 | 6.97 | 8.39 | |||
Zn2 | 4.39 | 6.75 | 7.96 | 8.89 | |||
L.S.D0.05 | M | Zn | S | Zn. M | S.M | S. Zn | S. Zn.M |
0.405 | 0.496 | 0.573 | 0.702 | 0.810 | 0.992 | 1.403 | |
M0 = without mycorrhiza * M1 = with mycorrhiza Zn0 = without zinc Zn1 = mineral zinc Zn2 = nano-zinc | S1 = 2 dS m−1 S2= 4 dS m−1 S3 = 6 dS m−1 S4 = 8 dS m−1 |
Table 1.
Mycorrhiza M (20 g/pot) | Type of zinc Zn (15 mg L−1) | Salinity levels of irrigation water S (dS m−1) | Average of mycorrhiza | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | ||||
M0 | Zn0 | 3.81 | 3.96 | 3.15 | 5.21 | 3.75 | |
Zn1 | 2.91 | 3.57 | 3.99 | 4.36 | |||
Zn2 | 3.08 | 3.20 | 4.75 | 3.03 | |||
M1 | Zn0 | 4.67 | 3.31 | 3.19 | 3.46 | 3.28 | |
Zn1 | 1.20 | 2.91 | 3.01 | 3.76 | |||
Zn2 | 3.78 | 3.43 | 3.00 | 3.69 | |||
Salinity levels of irrigation rate | 3.24 | 3.40 | 3.52 | 3.92 | |||
Zinc rate | Zn0 | Zn1 | Zn2 | ||||
3.84 | 3.21 | 3.49 | |||||
M. Zn | Zn0 | Zn1 | Zn2 | ||||
M0 | 3.27 | 3.58 | 3.96 | ||||
M1 | 3.21 | 3.21 | 3.05 | ||||
M. S | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | |||
M0 | 3.27 | 3.58 | 3.96 | 4.20 | |||
M1 | 3.21 | 3.21 | 3.05 | 3.64 | |||
S. Zn | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | |||
Zn0 | 4.24 | 3.64 | 3.17 | 4.33 | |||
Zn1 | 2.05 | 3.24 | 3.50 | 4.06 | |||
Zn2 | 3.43 | 3.31 | 3.88 | 3.36 | |||
L.S.D0.05 | M | Zn | S | Zn. M | S.M | S. Zn | S. Zn.M |
0.420 | 0.514 | 0.594 | 0.727 | 0.840 | 1.029 | 1.455 | |
M0 = without mycorrhiza * M1 = with mycorrhiza Zn0 = without zinc Zn1 = mineral zinc Zn2 = nano-zinc | S1 = 2 dS m−1 S2 = 4 dS m−1 S3 = 6 dS m−1 S4 = 8 dS m−1 |
Table 2.
The interaction between mycorrhiza, zinc, and different levels of saline water in SOD enzyme (unit g. protein−1 fresh weight) of wheat crop.
Mycorrhiza M (20 g/pot) | Type of zinc Zn (15 mg L−1) | Salinity levels of irrigation water S (dS m−1) | Average of mycorrhiza | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | ||||
M0 | Zn0 | 1.979 | 2.435 | 2.328 | 2.917 | 2.304 | |
Zn1 | 1.837 | 2.421 | 2.523 | 2.373 | |||
Zn2 | 1.876 | 2.273 | 2.238 | 2.453 | |||
M1 | Zn0 | 2.492 | 2.452 | 2.135 | 2.381 | 2.175 | |
Zn1 | 1.463 | 2.129 | 2.574 | 2.964 | |||
Zn2 | 1.441 | 1.723 | 1.902 | 2.450 | |||
Salinity levels of irrigation rate | 1.848 | 2.239 | 2.283 | 2.590 | |||
Zinc rate | Zn0 | Zn1 | Zn2 | ||||
2.390 | 2.285 | 2.045 | |||||
M. Zn | Zn0 | Zn1 | Zn2 | ||||
M0 | 2.415 | 2.288 | 2.210 | ||||
M1 | 2.365 | 2.282 | 1.879 | ||||
M. S | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | |||
M0 | 1.897 | 2.376 | 2.363 | 2.581 | |||
M1 | 1.799 | 2.101 | 2.203 | 2.598 | |||
S. Zn | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | |||
Zn0 | 2.235 | 2.444 | 2.231 | 2.649 | |||
Zn1 | 1.650 | 2.275 | 2.548 | 2.668 | |||
Zn2 | 1.658 | 1.998 | 2.070 | 2.452 | |||
L.S.D0.05 | M | Zn | S | Zn. M | S.M | S. Zn | S. Zn.M |
n.s | 0.2325 | 0.2684 | 0.3288 | 0.3796 | 0.4649 | 0.6575 | |
*M0 = without mycorrhiza M1 = with mycorrhiza Zn0 = without zinc Zn1 = mineral zinc Zn2 = nano-zinc | S1 = 2 dS m−1 S2 = 4 dS m−1 S3 = 6 dS m−1 S4 = 8 dS m−1 |
Table 3.
The interaction between mycorrhiza, zinc, and different levels of saline water in POD enzyme (unit g. protein−1 fresh weight) of wheat crop.
4. Bioremediation of heavy metals using nanomaterials and mycorrhizae
Heavy metal elements like copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and zinc (Zn) have made their way into the human living environment through various pathways such as atmospheric precipitation, dust, transportation, and activities like agriculture, industrial wastewater, and vehicle emissions [33, 34, 35], resulting in serious heavy metal pollution that can accumulate in crops and animals, affecting their growth and poisoning and eventually entering the human body through the food chain and food web, endangering human health and even life [36]. A variety of diseases can arise from the accumulation of heavy metal elements in the human body, such as cancers [37]. Improving soils and waste contaminated with heavy metals is crucial for achieving a clean and sustainable environment. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play a role in alleviating the harmful effects of different pollutants on plants [38]. Copper oxide nanoparticles (nano-CuO) are considered a growing environmental concern for
5. Negatively influence nanomaterials interaction of mycorrhizae
Nanoparticles interact with mycorrhizae in various ways, some promoting colonization by AMF, while others hinder it [45]. Therefore, more detailed information is required on how arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) interact with nanoparticles. High levels of Fe3O4NPs can disrupt the symbiotic relationship between AM fungi and plants, leading to carbon and phosphorus cycling deterioration in the soil. These impacts are detrimental to crop yield and soil fertility [46]. The ecological system influences the growth of mycorrhizal clover, with 0.01 mg/kg of AgNPs inhibiting growth, while 0.1 mg/kg of AgNPs leads to increased AgNP content. This affects the ability of AMF to alleviate AgNP stress by reducing Ag content and the activity of antioxidant enzymes in plants [41]. The ecosystem significantly influences the growth of mycorrhiza. A concentration of 0.01 mg/kg of nanosilver AgNPs suppresses mycorrhizal growth, while higher concentrations such as 0.1 mg/kg have adverse effects on the AM fungal colonization in the roots of Corn plants (
6. Conclusions
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) always associate with the roots of higher plants and form a mutualistic symbiosis with the roots of over 90% of plant species. The results of the study showed that the employment of nanofertilizers and mycorrhizal fungi had significant improvements in some physiological and chemical characteristics of plants and decreased the negative effects of drought stress, as well as their positive effect on antioxidants and cell death under salinity stress. Recently, a revolution has been created in the world of nanotechnology, and its interaction with mycorrhizae has resulted in beneficial plant growth, biological enrichment, and improved connection of mycorrhizae with plants. Other challenges were negative, given that increasing the concentration of nanomaterials may lead to inhibiting mycorrhizal growth and infecting plant roots, which is worth studying in order to find the best that deserves study in order to find the best ways for this relationship. Hence, in this chapter, we concentrate on the effect of various nanoparticles combined with AMF on some physiological characteristics of plants under stress and the role of nanoparticles in positive and negative relationships.
Acknowledgments
To the administration of the University of Kerbala, and the College of Education for Pure Sciences for the support.
Dedication
To my dear ones.
My late husband, Professor Dr. Abdoun Hashim Alwan, Thanks and mercy.
My dear children.
Zainab, Zaid and Zeki.
References
- 1.
Khaliq A, Perveen S, Alamer KH, Zia Ul Haq M, Rafique Z, Alsudays IM, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis to enhance plant–soil interaction. Sustainability. 2022; 14 (13):7840 - 2.
Brundrett M. Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations. Biological Reviews. 2004; 79 (3):473-495 - 3.
Montesinos-Navarro A, Segarra-Moragues JG, Valiente-Banuet A, Verdú M. Plant facilitation occurs between species differing in their associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The New Phytologist. 2012; 196 (3):835-844 - 4.
Willis A, Rodrigues BF, Harris PJC. The ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. CRC Critical Review in Plant Sciences. 2013; 32 (1):1-20 - 5.
Wang F, Zhang L, Zhou J, Rengel Z, George TS, Feng G. Exploring the secrets of hyphosphere of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Processes and ecological functions. Plant and Soil. 2022; 481 (1):1-22 - 6.
Prasad K, Khare A, Rawat P. Glomic role in global sustainlomalin arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal reproduction, lifestyle and dynaable agriculture for future generation. In: Handbook of Fungal Reprod Growth. 1st ed. London, United Kingdom; 2022. pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.05772/intechopen95215.ch6 - 7.
Boutasknit A, Ait-el-mokhtar M, Fassih B, Ben-laouane R. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rock phosphate on growth, physiology, and biochemistry of carob under water stress and after rehydration in vermicompost-amended soil. Metabolites. 2024; 14 (4):202. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14040202 - 8.
Reed C, Wang R, Zhang Z, Wang H, Chen Y. Soil water deficit reduced root hydraulic conductivity of common reed (Phragmites australis). Plants. 2023; 12 (20):3543. DOI: 10.3390/plants12203543 - 9.
Khan F, Siddique AB, Shabala S, Zhou M. Phosphorus plays key roles in regulating plants’ physiological responses to abiotic stresses. Plants. 2023; 12 (15):2861. DOI: 10.3390/plants12152861 - 10.
Lu C, Zhang J. Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1999; 50 (336):1199-1206 - 11.
Birben E, Sahiner UM, Sackesen C, Erzurum S, Kalayci O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2012; 5 :9-19 - 12.
Buckley TN. The control of stomata by water balance. The New Phytologist. 2005; 168 (2):275-292 - 13.
Mathur S, Tomar RS, Jajoo A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protects photosynthetic apparatus of wheat under drought stress. Photosynthesis Research. 2019; 139 :227-238 - 14.
Singh MD. Nano-fertilizers is a new way to increase nutrients use efficiency in crop production. International Journal of Agricultural Science. 2017; 9 (7):975-3710 - 15.
Zhang Y, Goss GG. Nanotechnology in agriculture: Comparison of the toxicity between conventional and nano-based agrochemicals on non-target aquatic species. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022; 439 :129559 - 16.
Alsherif EA, Almaghrabi O, Elazzazy AM, Abdel-Mawgoud M, Beemster GTS, AbdElgawad H. Carbon nanoparticles improve the effect of compost and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in drought-stressed corn cultivation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023; 194 :29-40 - 17.
Alsherif EA, Almaghrabi O, Elazzazy AM, Abdel-Mawgoud M, Beemster GTS, Sobrinho RL, et al. How carbon nanoparticles, arbuscular mycorrhiza, and compost mitigate drought stress in maize plant: A growth and biochemical study. Plants. 2022; 11 (23):3324 - 18.
Ostadi A, Javanmard A, Amani Machiani M, Sadeghpour A, Maggi F, Nouraein M, et al. Co-application of TiO2 nanoparticles and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves essential oil quantity and quality of sage ( Salvia officinalis L.) in drought stress conditions. Plants. 2022;11 (13):1659 - 19.
Naseer M, Zhu Y, Li FM, Yang YM, Wang S, Xiong YC. Nano-enabled improvements of growth and colonization rate in wheat inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environmental Pollution. 2022; 295 :118724 - 20.
Majeed A, Muhammad Z. Salinity: A major agricultural problem—Causes, impacts on crop productivity and management strategies. In: Hasanuzzaman M, Hakeem K, Nahar K, Alharby H, editors. Handbook of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 83-99. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-06118-0_3 - 21.
Safdar H, Amin A, Shafiq Y, Ali A, Yasin R, Shoukat A, et al. A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Natural Science. 2019; 17 (1):34-40 - 22.
Beltrano J, Ruscitti M, Arango MC, Ronco M. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza inoculation on plant growth, biological and physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in pepper grown under different salinity and p levels. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2013; 13 (1):123-141 - 23.
Zhan F, Li B, Jiang M, Yue X, He Y, Xia Y, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance antioxidant defense in the leaves and the retention of heavy metals in the roots of maize. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018; 25 :24338-24347 - 24.
Wang J, Yuan J, Ren Q , Zhang B, Zhang J, Huang R, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhanced salt tolerance of Gleditsia sinensis by modulating antioxidant activity, ion balance and P/N ratio. Plant Growth Regulation. 2022; 97 (1):33-49 - 25.
Borde M, Dudhane M, Kulkarni M. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in salinity tolerance and growth response in plants under salt stress conditions. In: Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N, editors. Handbook of Mycorrhiza-Eco-Physiology, Secondary Metabolites Nanomaterials. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 71-86. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57849-1_5 - 26.
Chen L, Xiao Y. Silver nanoparticles and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence Trifolium repen root-associated AMF community structure and its co-occurrence pattern. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam). 2023; 320 :112232 - 27.
Online IP. Journal of crop nutrition. Science. 2017; 3 :3 - 28.
Seyed Sharifi R, Khalilzadeh R, Soltanmoradi S. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi and nano zinc oxide on seed yield, Na+ and K+ content of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) under salinity stress. Journal of Crop Nutrition Science. 2017;3 (4):40-53 - 29.
Aljenaby HK, Mohammed BT, Al-Semmak QH. The interaction between the mineral and nano zinc with mycorrhiza on the concentration of some nutrients, the ratio of K/Na and the proportion of protein in grains of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) irrigated with saline water. NeuroQuantology. 2022;20 (12):1183 - 30.
Aljenaby HK, Al-Semmak QH, Mohammed BT. The interaction between nano zinc and mycorrhiza on some wheat enzymes activity under saline conditions. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2022; 15 (2):539-557 - 31.
Ahmadi-Nouraldinvand F, Sharifi RS, Siadat SA, Khalilzadeh R. Reduction of salinity stress in wheat through seed bio-priming with mycorrhiza and growth-promoting bacteria and its effect on physiological traits and plant antioxidant activity with silicon nanoparticles application. Silicon. 2023; 15 (16):6813-6824 - 32.
Ahmadi-Nouraldinvand F, Sharifi RS, Siadat SA, Khalilzadeh R. Fascinating role of silicon dioxide nanoparticles and co-inoculation of mycorrhiza and Rhizobacteria to combat NaCl stress: Changes in physiological characteristics, uptake of nutrient elements, and enhancing photosystem II activities in wheat. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2024; 24 :277-294 - 33.
Khalef RN, Hassan AI, Saleh HM. Heavy metal’s environmental impact. In: Environmental Impact and Remediation of Heavy Metals. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2022 - 34.
Cimboláková I, Uher I, Laktičová KV, Vargová M, Kimáková T, Papajová I. Heavy metals and the environment. Environmental factors Affect Human Health. 2019; 1 :29 - 35.
Rahman Z, Singh VP. The relative impact of toxic heavy metals (THMs) (arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr)(VI), mercury (Hg), and lead (Pb)) on the total environment: An overview. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2019; 191 :1-21 - 36.
Mohammed AS, Kapri A, Goel R. Heavy metal pollution: Source, impact, and remedies. In: Khan M, Zaidi A, Goel R, Musarrat J, editors. Handbook of Biomanagement of Metal-Contaminated Soils. Environmental Pollution. Vol. 20. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. pp. 1-28. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1914-9_1Met soils - 37.
Budi HS, Catalan Opulencia MJ, Afra A, Abdelbasset WK, Abdullaev D, Majdi A, et al. Source, toxicity and carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2024; 39 (1):77-90 - 38.
Herath B, Madushan KWA, Lakmali JPD, Yapa PN. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a potential tool for bioremediation of heavy metals in contaminated soil. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2021; 10 (3):217-228 - 39.
Luo J, Yan Q , Yang G, Wang Y. Impact of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae on the physiological and defence responses of Canna indica to copper oxide nanoparticles stress. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8 (5):513 - 40.
Wang L, Yang D, Ma F, Wang G, You Y. Recent advances in responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-plant symbiosis to engineered nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 2022; 286 :131644 - 41.
Feng Y, Cui X, He S, Dong G, Chen M, Wang J, et al. The role of metal nanoparticles in influencing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi effects on plant growth. Environmental Science & Technology. 2013; 47 (16):9496-9504 - 42.
Cao J, Feng Y, Lin X, Wang J. A beneficial role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in influencing the effects of silver nanoparticles on plant-microbe systems in a soil matrix. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020; 27 (11):11782-11796 - 43.
Apodaca SA, Cota-Ruiz K, Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Gardea-Torresdey JL. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate phytotoxic effects of copper-based nanoparticles/compounds in spearmint ( Mentha spicata ). ACS Agricultural Science & Technology. 2022;2 (3):661-670 - 44.
Cao J, Feng Y, Lin X, Wang J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate the negative effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on bacterial community in rhizospheric soils. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2016; 4 :10 - 45.
Ingle A, Rathod D, Varma A, Rai M. Understanding the mycorrhiza-nanoparticles interaction. In: Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N, editors. Handbook of Mycorrhiza-Eco-Physiology, Secondary Metabolites, Nanomaterials. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 311-324. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57849-1_18 - 46.
Cao J, Feng Y, Lin X, Wang J, Xie X. Iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles deteriorate the mutual interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2017; 17 :841-851 - 47.
Cao J, Feng Y, He S, Lin X. Silver nanoparticles deteriorate the mutual interaction between maize ( Zea mays L.) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A soil microcosm study. Applied Soil Ecology. 2017;119 :307-316