Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Role and Mechanism of Action of Extremophilic Marine Actinobacteria in Plant Growth Promotion

Written By

Karthikeyan Prem Anand, Mangalam Achuthananda Jayasri and Krishnamurthy Suthindhiran

Submitted: 20 February 2024 Reviewed: 23 February 2024 Published: 24 June 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004799

Updates on Organic Farming IntechOpen
Updates on Organic Farming Edited by Subhan Danish

From the Edited Volume

Updates on Organic Farming [Working Title]

Dr. Subhan Danish and Dr. Shabir Hussain

Chapter metrics overview

5 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Food is an essential component of life for all humans and animals present on this planet, and food security is becoming more challenging across countries due to reduced food production, increased population, and climatic changes. Most of the nations are hastening to increase their food productivity to counteract food scarcity and undernourishment. The agriculture industry is the primary reservoir for food production and aids in reducing hunger, poverty, and food security. Recent trends in the usage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides to enhance crop productivity may provide better yields for shorter duration. Still, in the long run, this causes severe issues in soil fertility and affects soil ecosystems. Sustainable, eco-friendly agricultural practices are the future ventures of agriculture using microbe-based plant growth stimulants, fungicides, and pesticides. The genus Actinobacteria is renowned for its therapeutic and industrial values. However, their agricultural applications are merely overlooked. In addition, actinobacteria from terrestrial and coastal ecosystems have been widely explored, leaving the extreme marine environmental sites untouched. This book chapter focuses on uncovering the functional properties of polyextremophilic marine actinobacteria and their role and mechanism of action in plant growth promotion.

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • chemical fertilizers
  • soil infertility
  • extremophiles
  • marine actinobacteria
  • plant growth promotion

1. Introduction

Agriculture is an essential contributor to economic growth, accounting for nearly 4–25% of the country’s GDP, and is a powerful tool to enhance food security to feed ∼8.2 billion people, reduce poverty, and increase people’s prosperity [1, 2] Several developed and developing countries are focusing on increasing agriculture yield to develop immunity against food scarcity and malnutrition [3]. Such schemes were shocked due to changes in geopolitics impacting agriculture, such as increased prices of agricultural equipment, reduced crop yield due to climatic changes, pollution, and harsh chemical fertilizers and pesticides, causing soil infertility [4, 5]. In contrast to the issues in food production, it was also noticed that nearly 17% of the food produced is being wasted at various stages: production, transportation, processing, storage, and shelf life [6]. This is a severe concern, causing grievous damage to society by reducing food availability, creating malnutrition, and inflating food products. In addition, food waste management requires massive funding to process food waste [7, 8]. Meanwhile, underdeveloped countries dump food and agriculture waste and allow the waste to compost naturally, which is highly ineffective and can generate lethal effects on the environment, such as foul odor, leaching of toxins, burning causing reduced air quality, rearing of pests, and promotes the growth of pathogenic microbes [9].

Despite such issues on food scarcity and availability, global countries are increasing their food reserve by using higher volumes of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides to promote plant growth and yield to reserve food and feed the increasing global population [10, 11]. This strategy has ripe sufficient results and increased food availability. Several decades away now, the butterfly effect on the usage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides is causing severe issues in soil health, such as disruption of the soil ecosystem, eutrophication, groundwater contamination, soil infertility, and inducing carcinomas and other health ailments to humans [12, 13, 14]. To counteract such issues, sustainable and eco-friendly approaches are required in agricultural practices. One such advancement is the use of biofertilizers, biofungicides, pesticides, and herbicides to enhance plant growth and control pathogens, pests, and herbs, respectively [15]. Globally, biofertilizers are gaining serious momentum, and their usage is constantly increasing due to their lower price, higher yield, and longer shelf life. It has been projected to reach nearly 5.2 billion USD by 2025. Finally, the usage of biofertilizers aids in rejuvenating the soil ecosystem and protects the plants from biotic and abiotic stress [16].

Advertisement

2. Actinobacteria

The genus Actinobacteria is a gram-positive, aerobic bacteria with a high G-C content of up to 70% in their DNA [17]. Actinobacteria are unicellular bacteria that have non-distinct cell wall morphology (nonseptate) resembling fungi, which are also called higher-order bacteria. Furthermore, they also produce pigments, substrate, aerial mycelium, hyphae, and conidia, which gives the bacterial colonies their signature powdery nature [18]. Actinobacteria are well-known as omnipresent microbes that are present almost everywhere and commonly found across all types of soils, freshwater, and marine resources [19, 20]. In addition, actinobacteria are micro waste-processing bio-factories that decompose most of the organic matter present in the soil, such as proteins, fats, polysaccharides, humus, cellulose, and other organic compounds; without them, the earth will be filled with waste matter [21].

The emergence of diseases has made researchers explore microbial secondary metabolites, which has led to the discovery of nearly 23,000 metabolites, from which over 10,000 metabolites were extracted from the genus Actinobacteria. Antibiotic discoveries over the last decades have identified 12,000 antibiotic lead molecules, 70% of which were from actinobacteria. Meanwhile, the genus Streptomycetes has a distinctive contribution, and so far, 7600 compounds have been identified. In addition, the actinobacteria also produce several unique enzymes that have therapeutic, industrial, and bio-remediation values. Such properties make the actinobacteria worthy of further exploration, where the genus actinobacteria has been classified into 18 major lineages, with 6 classes, 5 subclasses, 6 orders, and 14 suborders. All the existing studies on actinobacteria with respect to the secondary metabolites and enzymes were only focused on the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, leaving the microbes from the extreme environmental sites untouched.

2.1 Extremophilic actinobacteria

Apart from the typical aquatic and terrestrial environments, the actinobacteria also thrive at extreme environmental sites such as hypersaline lagoons, salt pans, deep sea, acidic and alkaline environments, deserts, hydrothermal vents, radioactive sites, icebergs and glaciers. Such microbes present under extreme environmental conditions are generally addressed as extremophilic bacteria. Microbes that survive/tolerate multiple extreme environmental conditions are denoted as polyextremophilic bacteria. Due to their fungi-like resemblance, vegetative spore production, and unique metabolism, the actinobacteria can tolerate polyextremophilic abiotic stress present in the environment. Over the years, normal terrestrial and aquatic actinobacteria were considered for extracting antibiotics and natural compounds, leaving the actinobacteria present in extreme environmental conditions. Microbes surviving in extreme conditions have unique metabolic potential to efflux ions more effectively to survive in acidic and alkaline pH.

Furthermore, it also has unique enzymes which effectively function at wider temperatures, pH, and salinity. Finally, the presence of cryptic gene clusters of the microbes from the extreme environment has unique combinations to produce new secondary metabolites, which have not been identified so far. All such wonders from the actinobacteria make them more attractive to study and expose further properties of their extremophilic nature.

2.1.1 Halophilic actinobacteria

The earth is covered with ∼70% sea, which makes it the most prominent geographic location hard to access, which also contains a plethora of microbes waiting to be explored. So far, we have only identified less than 1% of microbes, and the rest are unexplored. The marine environment holds diverse extreme ecological niches such as coastal, deep sea, salt lakes, and mangroves. In general, the halophiles were broadly classified based on their salt tolerance levels as mild (0.5–2.5 M NaCl), moderate (1.5-4 M NaCl), and extreme-halophiles (2.5–5.5 M NaCl). In general, the actinobacteria thrive well in the typical coastal regions, with a copious amount of actinobacteria dominated by Streptomyces sp., Micromonospora sp., Rhodococcus sp., and Nocardia sp., as major genera commonly identified, followed by Nocardiopsis sp., Saccharothrix sp., Nonomuraea sp., Actinomadura sp., Saccharomonospora sp., and Promicromonospora sp., as least identified microbes from the coastal ecosystems (Table 1) [45, 46].

Extreme conditionStrainSampling siteNatural CompoundsPGP PropertiesReference
a. Salt Desert
Streptomyces sp. DB634Salar de Tara of the Atacama Desert, ChileAbenquines A and D[22]
Streptomyces sp. C3ChaxamycinD Chaxmycins A–D[23]
Streptomyces sp. DA3-7Lentzeosides A–F[24]
Lentzea sp. H45Saudi ArabiaPyridine-2,5-diacetamide[25]
Streptomyces sp.Morocco[26]
Streptomyces mutabilis IA1Saharan soilIAA, GA[27]
Nocardiopsis dassonvillei MB22Algerian Sahara soilIAA, siderophore, HCN[28]
b. Halophiles
Saccharomonospora azurea NA-128MoroccoN2 and K solubilization[26]
Georgenia halophilaSalt Lake in Xinjiang Province, China
Streptomyces sp. KLBMP S0051Salt Marsh, Jiangsu Province, ChinaIAA, siderophore, ACCD, P-solubilization[29]
Micromonospora sp. KLBMP S0019
Nocardiopsis sp.Deep Sea, Antarctica[30]
c. Acidophilic
Acidimicrobium sp.[31]
Actinospica sp.Salerno, Italy[32]
Acidothermus sp.[33]
Catenulispora sp.Salerno, Italy[32]
Ferrimicrobium sp.Sulfur mine, UKIron chelation[34]
Ferrithrix sp.
Rubrobacter sp.Hotsprings, Taiwan[35]
Amycolatopsis sp.
Streptomyces sp.
ThailandP-solubilization, siderophore, antifungal properties[36]
d. Alkaliphilies
Microcella sp.Cabeço de Vide in Southern Portugal[37]
Nesterenkonia sp.Wuhan, China[38]
Nitriliruptor sp.Soda Lake, Russia[39]
Yaniella sp.Salt mine, Pakistan[40]
e. Thermophilic
Microbispora siamensis DMKUA 245 TSoil sample, Thailand[41]
Actinokineospora soli YIM 75948 TYunnan province, China[42]
Saccharomonospora viridis SJ-21Hotspring, Gujarat[43]
Ferrithrix thermotolerans Y005TGeothermal site in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA[34]
Streptomyces Calidiresistens YIM 7808 THotspring, Tengchong, Yunnan province, southwest China
Actinomadura miaoliensis BC 44–5 TMiaoli County, Taiwan[44]

Table 1.

Various extremophilic actinobacteria strains have been identified so far.

2.1.1.1 Deep sea

The marine ecosystem has a wide range of zones and geographic variations based on which several ecosystems are thriving; one such is the deep sea ecosystem. The deep sea is one of the enigmatic sites that stayed unnoticed till the challenger deep sea mission was carried out using the Mariana Trench, which is below 10,916 metres from the surface. The diversity analysis carried out using advanced high throughput sequence (HTS) analysis revealed the presence of Chloroflexi (SAR202 and other lineages), Planctomycetes sp., Bacteroidetes sp., “Ca. Marinimicrobia” (Marine group A and SAR406), Thaumarchaeota, “Ca. Woesearchaeota” (Deep-sea Hydrothermal Vent Euryarchaeotic Group 6), and Gemmatimonadetes (archaeal α subgroup) [47]. Similarly, the deep sediment analysis performed from the south Colombian Caribbean Sea at a depth of 1681–2409 metres results highlighted the presence of 36 phyla, 89 classes, 93 orders, 104 families, 90 genera, and 53 species, among them Proteobacteria sp., Bacteroidetes sp., Firmicutes sp., Actinobacteria sp., and Chloroflexi sp., were the top 5 phyla identified from the selected deep-sea sediments [48]. Such studies indicate the presence and abundance of richer polyextremophilic microbial diversity of microbes tolerating higher pressure, lower temperature, and anoxic conditions from the deep sea regions. Such conditions cause microbes to produce various unique metabolites and enzymes for their survival to avoid competition, nutrient depletion, and effective adaptation to harsh environmental conditions.

2.1.1.2 Salt lakes and salt pans

Salt lakes are one of the harshest ecological niches developed due to the natural process of constant fluctuation and evaporation of water levels, precipitation, increased salt concentration, and intense UV radiation, which allow the formation of arid crystalline salt sedimentation over the soil. In addition, the salt deserts contain higher concentrations of Na, Ca, K, SO4, Mg, HCO3, and Cl ions [49]. Most of the halotolerant and halophilic microbes flourish in such environmental conditions. Diversity studies conducted on salt flats from UAE at various zones reveal the ample abundance of Bacteroidetes, followed by Euryarchaeota sp., unclassified bacteria, Actinobacteria sp., and Cyanobacteria sp., from the core salt flat samples and an abundance of Proteobacteria and Parcubacteria species from the samples collected away from the salt flats. In continuation, diversity analysis conducted from the salt pans from Goa, India, showcased the dominant phyla as Pseudomonadota sp., Bacillota sp., and Candidatus Patescibacteria. Finally, studies in Qaidam and Qinghai Lake, from China, highlighted the actinobacteria diversity and revealed the presence of 19 generas, such as Actinotalea sp., Corynebacterium sp., Tsukamurella sp., Gaiella sp., Rhodococcus sp., and Tetrasphaera sp., from Qaidam Lake and 69 generas such as Ilumatobacter sp., Actinotalea sp., Aquihabitans sp., Marmoricola sp., Arthrobacter sp., and Demequina sp., from Qinghai Lake. Such actinobacteria are exceptionally rare and require further analysis by cultivable approach to unlock the mystery of their cryptic gene clusters and the mode of action [50]. As mentioned earlier, the salt pans and flats ecosystems are constantly exposed to UV radiation. Research studies have identified that such strains have genes encoding for HQ443199 of Ver 3 (class-I photolyase), which is responsible for repairing the UV-induced DNA lesions at the pyrimidine (6–4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PPs) and cis-syn cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CDP). Such gene regulatory mechanisms can do wonders in genetic engineering and have a significant impact on scientific advancements [51].

2.1.2 Alakiphilic and acidophilic actinobacteria

The Industrial Revolution paved the way for higher emissions of pollutants in the soil and air. Also, the higher use of nitrogenous fertilizers has led to the occurrence of acid rain and soil acidification and a reduction in the soil pH of 4–6.5. Such acidic environments are commonly found in mines, where minerals are extracted using chemical techniques, higher crop cultivation without crop rotation, nitrification using fertilizers, and waste dumping yards. Similarly, the alkaliphiles are microbes surviving at alkaline soil conditions ranging from pH 8–11.5. The primary alkaline environments are soda-salt lakes and arid saline mineral-rich soil, which are the primary sources of alkaline environments. The alkaline environment is commonly found with reduced Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions, which is due to the weathering of calcium and magnesium ions by CO2, which releases OH and increases the soil pH to 11.5 [52]. The marine actinobacteria mainly withstand acidic environmental conditions due to their H+ antiport systems, like H+ATPase activity, which efflux acidic products out of the cells and reduce the proton concentrations in the cells, using the which regulate the intracellular cytosol pH [53]. Previous reports on commonly identified acidophilic actinobacteria are Streptomyces sp., Nocardia sp., Amycolatopsis sp., Mycobacterium sp., Nonomuraea sp., Verrucosispora sp., Micromonosporas sp., and Saccharopolyspora sp. [36]. Similarly, studies on alkaliphilic microbes state that alkaliphiles are mostly polyextremophilic in nature, such as alkali thermophiles, alkali-halophiles, and alkali-psychrophiles. The most identified alkaliphilic bacterial genera are Streptomyces sp., Micromonospora sp., Nocardioides sp., Nesterenkonia sp., Isoptericola sp., Microcella sp., Streptosporangium sp., Georgenia sp., Corynebacterium sp., Nocardiopsis sp., Cellulomonas sp., Saccharothrix sp., Arthrobacter sp., and Saccharomonospora sp. [37, 54, 55, 56, 57].

2.1.3 Thermophilic actinobacteria

The thermophilic actinobacteria are chemoorganotrophs that can prosper beyond 28 to 80°C and are predominantly found in hot springs, hydrothermal vents, salt pans, deserts, and decaying matter. Where the thermotolerant strains can tolerate and survive till 45–50°C. At the same time, the thermophilic microbes can only thrive at higher temperatures, 45–55°C being the optimum temperature. The thermophilic bacteria can tolerate and survive at much higher temperatures due to their unique adaptation on the DNA levels. These strains mainly contain higher GC content, which makes them more stable at higher temperatures. In addition, the amino acid analysis reveals that mesophilic and thermophilic strains contain a higher percentage of charged amino acid residues on the proteins (Glu, Asp, Lys, and Arg) than polar amino acids [58]. Finally, the chemotaxonomic analysis on the cell wall composition states that the thermophilic and thermotolerant strains mainly contain type-III (meso-DAP with the presence or absence of madurose) and type-IV (meso-DAP with galactose and arabinose) cell wall composition. The most identified class of actinobacteria strains are Streptomyces sp., Thermophilia sp., Actinobacteria sp., Rubrobacteria sp., and Acidimicrobiia sp., which includes Thermomonospora sp., Thermopolyspora sp., Thermocatellispora sp., Thermobispora sp., Thermotunica sp., Thermoleophilum sp., Acidimicrobium sp., and Acidothermus sp., including only thermophilic species of actinobacteria [59].

Advertisement

3. Plant growth-promoting actinobacteria (PGPA)

Despite the negative echoes of the usage of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, inducing abiotic stress, it has left us to search for substitutes and allowed us to explore other non-conventional ventures. Microbe-based plant growth promotion is gaining substantial attention due to its availability, low cost, ease of administration, better yield rates, and new opportunities for biofertilizer development. The microbes near and around the plant rhizosphere region contribute greatly to plant growth promotion. In general, the bacterial genera Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., Actinobacteria sp., Cellulosimicrobium sp., Klebsiella terrigena, Acetobacter sp., and Enterobacter sp., were known to have plant-growth-promoting properties [60]. Similarly, in the fungal kingdom, the Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Penicillium genera are studied and commercially available as plant growth-promoting fungi [61, 62]. Among these existing plant growth-promoting microbes (PGPM), the marine polyextremophilic actinobacteria have not been extensively studied for their plant growth-promoting properties. Despite their extremophilic and extremely tolerant nature, marine actinobacteria can be suitable for application as plant growth-promoting actinobacteria (PGPA) and exploring their mechanism of direct and indirect plant growth promoting can lead us to the development and commercialization of eco-friendly, cost-effective biofertilizers (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Direct and indirect plant growth promotion of the marine actinobacteria.

Advertisement

4. Direct mechanism

4.1 Nitrogen fixation

Nitrogen is an essential component for all living beings, including plants, to support their growth. Nitrogen is the critical component for photosynthesis, amino acid production, and DNA replication mechanism. The nitrogen is mainly available as atmospheric nitrogen (N2) and is naturally converted into ammonia. Which only contributes to the niche percentage of the ammonia present in the soil. The primary mode for nitrogen fixation is where nearly 70% of the atmospheric nitrogen is fixed through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) using soil microorganisms or rhizosphere bacteria. The nitrogen fixation mechanism occurs based on two different types of microbes: associative method (synbiotic) and free-living (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Biological nitrogen fixation process in soil.

4.1.1 Symbiotic nitrogen fixation

In the associative nitrogen fixation process, the microbes fix the atmospheric nitrogen for the plants, where the plants produce a flavonoid substance from their roots, which attracts bacteria and triggers the nod gene present in the bacteria to produce nod factor and cause root infection and form the nodule primordia [63]. Further, the leguminous hemoglobin (LegHb) present in the root nodule scavenges the oxygen present in the root nodule. It makes the nodule anoxic, which facilitates the nitrogenase enzyme, which is a complex metalloenzyme dinitrogenase (molybdenum nitrogenase, vanadium nitrogenase, and iron-only nitrogenase) containing two-alpha subunits synthesized by NifDK genes. Paired with dinitrogenase reductase (Fe protein) containing two-beta subunits synthesized using NifH genes. Two nitrogen atoms form the atmospheric nitrogen (N2) fused using triple covalent bonds, making the molecule unreactive [64]. The nitrogenase enzyme, in the absence of oxygen, breaks the covalently bonded nitrogen atoms and replaces the H ions, resulting with the aid of ATP molecules scavenging from the host plant or produced by its own (Cyanobacteria) and producing two molecules of ammonia and 16 molecules of inorganic phosphate are produced. Finally, the produced ammonia is converted into ammonium ions and further oxidized to form nitrate and nitrite salts using Nitrococcus and Nitrosomonas soil bacteria, which the plants can uptake through roots. There are several known bacterial genera for fixing atmospheric nitrogen, such as Azotobacter sp., Clostridium sp., Cyanobacteria sp., and Beijerinckia sp. Meanwhile, in actinobacteria, the genus Frankia is well-known for nitrogen fixation on leguminous plants.

N2+8e+8H++16ATP2NH3+H2+16ADP+16PiE1

4.1.2 Asymbiotic nitrogen fixation

Apart from host-assisted nitrogen fixation, ammonia is also produced by non-symbiotic microbes such as Klebsiella sp., Bacillus sp., and Clostridium sp., and actinobacteria genera include Arthrobacter sp., Agromyces sp., Corynebacterium sp., Mycobacterium sp., Micromonospora sp., Propionibacteria sp., and Streptomyces sp., can fix atmospheric nitrogen as free-living microbes. The genus Frankia can function as a symbiotic and free-living nitrogen-fixing microbe [65, 66].

4.2 Nutrient solubilization

4.2.1 Phosphate solubilization

Phosphate is one of the essential factors required for plant growth; in general, phosphate is available in an insoluble form, which limits plant growth, and the phosphate-solubilizing microbes are essential for converting the insoluble phosphate to plant-soluble form. The soil phosphate is available in the form of aluminum phosphate, tricalcium phosphate, and iron phosphate. In addition, organophosphates are available in the form of phytin, sugar phosphates, inositol phosphates, phosphonates, nucleotides, phospholipids, and phosphoproteins. Typically, the phosphate in the soil can be solubilized using the acidification process by replacing the H+ ions in substitution with cations to the phosphate. Soil microbes convert the phosphate by producing organic acids as a result of metabolizing the carbon sources. In contrast, actinobacteria have not been well studied for their organic acid production. Studies have reported that the actinobacteria produces citric acid, lactic acid, malic acid, oxalic acid, and gluconic acid. At the same time, the actinobacteria are reported to produce phosphatases and phytase enzymes, which convert the organophosphates to plant-soluble phosphates. Studies have reported that Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., and Actinobacteria sp., are well-known for their phosphate solubilization, from which Streptomyces sp., and Norcardiopsis sp., are well-studied for their phosphate solubilization activity (Figure 3) [67, 68].

Figure 3.

Microbial phosphate solubilization process.

4.2.2 Potassium solubilization

Similar to phosphate, potassium (K+) is also an essential macronutrient for plants. By nature, in soil, the K+ is available as rock potassium and potassium aluminosilicate, from which only 2% of the K+ is available in the plant uptake form. The K+ is biologically converted using the microbes by producing siderophores and producing organic acids, and chelating the metal ions (Ca+2, Fe+2, Si+4, and Al+3), which liberates K+ and converting them into potassium silicate or aluminum silicate ions. In addition, the potassium can also be solubilized using the extracellular polymers, which assimilate the K+ ions. The well-known microbes with K+ solubilization are Acidothiobacillus sp., Azospirillum sp., Azotobacter sp., Bacillus sp., Enterobacter sp., Erwinia sp., Paenibacillus sp., Pantoea sp., Pseudomonas sp., Streptomyces sp., Marinococcus sp., and Serratia sp. (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Microbial potassium solubilization process.

4.3 Phytohormones

4.3.1 Auxins

Plant hormones are vital resources that contribute to plant growth, metabolic regulation, and tolerating biotic and abiotic stress. The auxin is synonymously known as IAA (indole 3-acetic acid) and is produced through six various pathways; one such is the IPA (indole-3-pyruvate) pathway. Most of the pathways use the L-tryptophan as the precursor molecule (Figure 5). The IAA is essential for adventitious and lateral plant root development, by which plants can take up better nutrients and minerals. The endogenous production of auxin levels in plants is affected mainly due to abiotic stress factors such as pH, environmental stress, and root exudates. So, supplementing the exogenous auxin can be an alternative technique to promote plant growth. Biochemical studies have identified microbes that also produce IAA, which can be used to facilitate better plant growth. The bacterial genera Azospirillum sp., Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., and Actinobacteria sp. are well-known genera that produce the IAA. Constant application of the IAA hormone through biofertilizers can provide sustained plant growth without having any adverse effect on the plants [69, 70].

Figure 5.

Structure of auxin.

4.3.2 Cytokinins

Cytokinins are one of the critical growth regulators that play a crucial role in root cell development, division, and differentiation. In addition, it also reduces leaf senescence, increases chlorophyll production, enhances protein production for mitosis, and increases apical dominance in plants. So far, nearly 200 different types of cytokinins have been identified from plants, mosses, bacteria, and fungi. In the bacteria, the cytokinins were first identified on the Agrobacterium tumefaciens and subsequently identified on Azospirillum sp., Azotobacter sp., Bacillus sp., Rhizobium sp., Pseudomonas sp., and Actinobacteria sp. The seed treated with cytokinins showed higher seed germination and shoot propagation (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Structure of cytokinin.

4.3.3 Gibberellins

The gibberellins (GA) are part of the plant growth-regulating hormones known for plant shoot promotion. Nearly 136 different varieties of GA have been identified in plants, fungi, and bacteria [71]. Structurally, the GA are tetracyclic diterpenoid carboxylic acids containing ent-20-norgibberellane (C19) carbon skeletons or ent-gibberellin (C20) among the existing GA. The GA3 is most widely seen in microbes, followed by GA1, GA4, and GA7, which are known to promote shoot development. The GA is commonly applied for promoting seed germination under low light conditions, elongation of internodes, treatment of plant dwarfism, reducing dormancy in buds, and trait selection. The Gibberella fujikuroi and Trichoderma are the fungal species well studied for GA production and the bacterial communities [72]: Actinobacteria sp., Azotobacter sp., Acetobacter sp., Azospirillum sp., Bacillus sp., Herbospirillum sp., Rhizobium sp., and Pseudomonas sp., are the commonly explored bacterial species with gibberellin production [73]. Among the actinobacteria genus, Streptomyces sp. and Nocardiosis sp. have been frequently identified for gibberellin production so far. The mode of action and gibberellin production is not yet understood (Figure 7) [74, 75].

Figure 7.

Structure of various types of gibberellins found in the microbes.

4.3.4 ACC deaminase

Plants present under various abiotic stress (increased pH, temperature, salinity, and nutrient availability) and biotic stress (infection and weeds) cause the plants to produce ethylene. Ethylene is a stress hormone that causes stunting of growth, leaf abscission, flower wilting, and ripening of fruits. The 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is the precursor for the ethylene production. Administration of the PGPB, which produces ACC deaminase, will convert the ACC into ammonia and α-ketobutyrate. This mechanism of action reduces the adverse effects caused by ethylene and can attain better growth promotion for plants growing in unfavorable conditions. The actinobacteria producing ACC deaminase are Streptomyces sp., Arthrobacter sp., Actinoplanes sp., Brevibacterium sp., Nocardioidaceae sp., and Rhodococcus sp. In addition, the halophilic actinobacteria, such as Micrococcus sp., Corynebacterium sp., and Arthrobacter sp., can promote plant growth at higher salinity (Figure 8) [75, 76].

Figure 8.

Mechanism of action of the ACC deaminase by the PGPB.

4.4 Siderophore production

The siderophores are low molecular weight iron chelating compounds with greater affinity for iron molecules. The plant grows in iron-depleted regions such as soil with high CaCO3 contents, higher pH, and salinity. In such regions, the soil iron content will be very minimal and, in complex form (Fe3+), which plants cannot uptake. So far, 500 different siderophores have been detected, among which 270 have been structurally classified. The siderophore from the plants, bacterial, and fungal sources converts and mobilizes the complex iron (Fe3+) to (Fe2+) irons. Moreover, iron is required and part of enzymes such as cytochromes, photosystem I and II, ferredoxin, chlorophyll synthesis, and other metabolic processes. Generally, the siderophores are synthesized by Azotobacter sp., Azospirillum sp., Bacillus sp., Klebsiella sp., Methylobacterium sp., Nocardia sp., Pseudomonas sp., Rhodococcus sp., and Streptomyces sp. The most emphasized actinobacteria genera producing siderophore are Actinomadura sp., Arthrobacter sp., Brevibacterium sp., Streptomyces sp., Micromonospora sp., Nocardiopsis sp., Pseudarthrobacter sp., Pseudonocardia sp., and Rhodococcus sp.

4.5 Systemic resistance

Systemic resistance in plants is the profound defense mechanism found among all plants. Which is the underlying mechanism and can be classified into induced systemic resistance (ISR) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR).

4.5.1 Induced systemic resistance

The first stage in the ISR reaction is the detection of the microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP), which can be further coined as the pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). Along with it, the ISR mechanism is triggered by various chemical and hormonal elicitors such as volatile organic compounds (VOC) (alcohols, ketones, esters, sulfides, alkanes, terpenoids, and sesquiterpenes), siderophores, auxin, cytokinins, flagellin, chitin, nitrous oxide, and other stimulating agents produced by the pathogenic microbes. The plants can distinguish and process information about the type of microbes, either beneficial or pathogenic, using the pattern recognition receptor (PRR). In contrast, other chemical and hormonal elicitor trigger their defense mechanism using the receptors (Rs) or hormonal receptors (HRs). When the pathogenic microbes come in contact with the plants and express PAMP, the plant’s roots undergo conformational changes mediated by the elicitors and trigger the ISR mechanism, which causes increased jasmonic acid (JA) levels, which cascades in elevated ethylene (ET) levels, followed activation of non-expressor of pathogenesis-related genes and production of defensive compounds. Researchers have identified a strong correlation between the levels of iron (Fe2+) in the soil and the ISR mechanism. Studies have also reported that a reduction in the soil iron levels can facilitate the defense mechanism by elevating the JA and salicylic acid (SA) followed by ET and NPR1, leading to the response for iron deficiency response by the plants. The beneficial microbe present at 10−5 to 10−7 levels in the plant rhizosphere regions can suppress the plant’s ISR mechanism by priming to the host plant roots, creating a symbiotic relationship between the plants and beneficiary microbes. The symbiotic microbes reduce the ET levels caused by the ISR mechanism by producing ACC deaminase and reducing the stress in the plants. In addition, it also produces siderophores and creates a Fe environment, which reduces the iron availability for the pathogens and eliminates them. Such approaches pave the way for plant growth promotion (Figure 3) [77, 78].

4.5.2 Systemic acquired resistance

The SAR in plants is analogous to non-specific immunity or innate immunity found in the eukaryotes and fungi. The primary mechanism is similar to the ISR, where in SAR, the infection can be site-specific near the roots or general infection caused by viruses, bacteria, and fungi. When the pathogen induces infection, the PAMP is recognized by the plants and induces PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI), where the plants induce a hypersensitivity reaction followed by increasing the salicylic acid (SA), which induces the NPR-1 gene by positive regulation and further cascades and interacts with the TGA transcription factors and leads to the expression of PR genes which produces various metabolites inhibiting the infection and growth of pathogens [79]. The detailed mechanism of action is illustrated in Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Systemic resistance inducing ISR and SAR mechanism in plants.

Advertisement

5. Indirect mechanism

5.1 Biocontrol of pathogens

Apart from the direction, PGP contribution is through various phytohormones, degradative enzymes, nutrient assimilation, and volatile organic compounds. Plant growth promotion is also achieved indirectly by controlling the phytopathogens such as fungal, bacterial, and viruses present in the environment. Over the decades, research on beneficiary microbes has been conducted, and conclusive results have been obtained for the Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Trichoderma sp., and nuclear polyhedrosis virus are used commercially for controlling the phytopathogens present in the soil ecosystems [80]. Meanwhile, the actinobacteria, except the genus Frankia sp., have not been thoroughly studied for their PGP properties. In addition, actinobacteria are known for their antibiotic biosynthesis and are a dominant contributor to nearly 80% of the antibiotics produced, especially the genus Streptomycetes sp. Having such broad natural product biosynthesis properties, the marine actinobacterium is an excellent microbe to be used as a PGPA. The production of VOC from the marine actinobacteria plays a crucial role in the soil ecosystem protecting the plants from pathogens such as the siderophores and hydrogen cyanide nitrogen (HCN) aids in Fe-scavenging from the soils leads to the inhibition of the cytochrome c oxidase due to termination of the enzyme activity especially from the genus Streptomycetes sp., Actinomadura sp., Nocardia sp., Micromonospora sp., and Microbispora sp. Furthermore, the VOC, such as nitric oxide, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, and other cyclic compounds, aids in the suppression of pathogenic microbes and fungi [81, 82].

In continuation, the microbes with the properties to produce various hydrolytic enzymes such as protease, chitinase, phospholipase, glucanase, and cellulase destroy the bacterial and fungal cell walls and inactivate the pathogens. Most of the actinobacteria genera mentioned earlier have the ability to produce various enzymes, especially the extremophiles, which can produce enzymes with their activity in extreme environmental conditions. Finally, microbial quorum sensing is a prominent phenomenon in the bacterial ecosystem, specifically the rhizosphere areas. Detection of the pathogenic microbes instantly triggers the actinobacteria to act against the pathogens (Table 2).

StrainsTarget fungiFungal Disease PreventionReference
Streptomyces sp.Fusarium oxysporum
F. cucumerinum
F. moniliforme
Botrytis cinerea
Ceratocystis fimbriata
Colletotrichum capsica
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
Wilting, leaf curls, spots, stunting, and blight[83, 84, 85, 86]
Streptomyces sampsonii
Streptomyces flavovariabilis
Aspergillus niger
Alternaria tenuissima
Rhizoctonia solani
Penicillium expansum
Wilting[87]
Nocardiopsis dassonvilleiBipolaris sorokinianaRoot rot[88]
Amycolatopsis sp.F. graminearumBlight[89]
Arthrobacter humicolaA. alternataLeaf spot, blight, and rot[90]

Table 2.

Actinobacteria strains tested for their phytopathogen activity on plants.

5.2 Biocontrol of weeds

Weeds are an unavoidable threat to the agriculture industry, and they have a profound impact on plant cultivation. In general, weeds are unwanted plant growth present in the field, which scavenge all the necessary nutrients in the soil, leading to nutrient depletion in the soil and undernourishment of the desired plants. Over the years, manual removal of the weeds has predominantly been practised, which is laborious and time-consuming and cannot cope with the weed growth. Further, the chemical weedicides were identified, such as Pendimethalin, S-Ethyl dipropyl thiocarbamate, Metolachlor, Glyphosate, Isoproturon, Ethyl ester, Pendimethalin, Neem extract, and Pretilachlor. Moreover, higher usage to suppress the weeds is reported to cause severe issues to the soil, plants, humans, and livestock [91]. Microbe-based biopesticides are being developed to avoid the lethal effects of chemical pesticides. Studies have identified the genus Streptomycetes sp. as the potential candidate, which illustrates higher weedicide activity based on its reputation in secondary metabolite production. In addition, studies were conducted on the endophytic actinobacteria such as Actinomadura sp., Nocardiodes sp., Microbispora sp., Saccharopolyspora sp. and Streptomyces sp., tested against Ageratum conyzoides, Parthenium hysterophorus, and Bidens biternate (Lour.) showcased significant plant inhibition by wilting, leaf curls, and burning effects on the plants [92]. Although it is well-known, advanced research on microbe-based bio-weedicides has not been carried out, and future focus should also target weed management instead of only focusing on plant growth promotion and pest management (Table 3).

StrainsTarget weedsReference
Actinomadura sp.
Nocardiodes sp.
Microbispora sp.
Saccharopolyspora sp.
Streptomyces sp
Parthenium hysterophorus
Ageratum conyzoides
Bidens biternata
[92]
Micrococcus sp.Chloris barbata Sw[93]
Streptomyces sp. strain KR0005Digitaria ciliaris[94]

Table 3.

Actinobacteria strains and their weedicide activity.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Research studies in the field of agriculture, especially the development of biofertilizers/biostimulants, biofungicides, biopesticides, and bio-weedicides, have not been explored to a greater extent. This facilitates the reliance on synthetic agrochemicals, and the usage of such chemicals is causing a severe impact on the ecosystem. In addition, the agricultural output is saturating, which is insufficient to feed the infinite human population. Also, the prolonged usage of chemical fungicides and pesticides causes increased resistance, which is lethal for controlling pathogens and reduces agricultural yield. The marine actinobacteria are the least studied microbes for their PGP properties, whereas the polyextremophilies are not explored with respect to agricultural applications. The implementation of the extremophilic actinobacteria is the future for sustainable agricultural practices. Due to their high tolerance towards salinity, pH, and temperatures, they can be applied in a variety of environments. In addition, their unexplored nature makes them unique microbes whose functions are yet to be deciphered. To develop alternative biofertilizers, fungicides, and weedicides, we need to have sound knowledge of the PGP microbes. This chapter illustrates and highlights the importance, applications, and future implications of the polyextremophilic marine actinobacteria.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors of this study wish to thank the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, under the Aquaculture and Marine Biotechnology scheme (Grant No: BT/PR9733/AAQ/3/649/2013) and Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, for providing us with all the necessary financial and infrastructure support.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Bommarco R, Vico G, Hallin S. Exploiting ecosystem services in agriculture for increased food security. Global Food Security [Internet]. 2018;17:57-63. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211912417301189
  2. 2. Carvalho FP. Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environmental Science & Policy [Internet]. 2006;9(7–8):685-692. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1462901106001092
  3. 3. Azeem MM. In: Sahn DE, editor. The Fight against Hunger and Malnutrition: The Role of Food, Agriculture and Targeted Policies. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. 528 p. ISBN: 9780198733201, ₤65. Aust J Agric Resour Econ [Internet]. 2016;60(3) 10.1111/1467-8489.12154
  4. 4. Mall RK, Gupta A, Sonkar G. Effect of climate change on agricultural crops. In: Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering [Internet]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 23-46. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780444636614000025
  5. 5. Brunelle T, Dumas P, Souty F, Dorin B, Nadaud F. Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields. Agricultural Economics [Internet]. 2015;46(5):653-666. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12161
  6. 6. Grandhi B, Appaiah SJ. What a waste! A study of food wastage behavior in Singapore. Journal of Food Products Marketing [Internet]. 2016;22(4):471-485. DOI: 10.1080/10454446.2014.885863
  7. 7. Paritosh K, Kushwaha SK, Yadav M, Pareek N, Chawade A, Vivekanand V. Food waste to energy: An overview of sustainable approaches for food waste management and nutrient recycling. BioMed Research International [Internet]. 2017;2017:1-19. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2017/2370927/
  8. 8. Martin-Rios C, Demen-Meier C, Gössling S, Cornuz C. Food waste management innovations in the foodservice industry. Waste Management [Internet]. 2018;79:196-206. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0956053X18304562
  9. 9. Sun SK, Lu YJ, Gao H, Jiang TT, Du XY, Shen TX, et al. Impacts of food wastage on water resources and environment in China. Journal of Cleaner Production [Internet]. 2018;185:732-739. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652618306802
  10. 10. Tang Q, Cotton A, Wei Z, Xia Y, Daniell T, Yan X. How does partial substitution of chemical fertiliser with organic forms increase sustainability of agricultural production? Science of the Total Environment [Internet]. 2022;803:149933. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969721050087
  11. 11. Stewart WM, Dibb DW, Johnston AE, Smyth TJ. The contribution of commercial fertilizer nutrients to food production. Agronomy Journal [Internet]. 2005;97(1):1-6. Available from: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/agronj2005.0001
  12. 12. Baweja P, Kumar S, Kumar G. Fertilizers and Pesticides. Their Impact on Soil Health and Environment. In: Giri B, Varma A. editors. Soil Health. Soil Biology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2020. p. 59. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44364-1_15
  13. 13. Pahalvi HN, Rafiya L, Rashid S, Nisar B, Kamili AN. Chemical fertilizers and their impact on soil health. In: Microbiota and Biofertilizers. Vol. 2 [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 1-20. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_1
  14. 14. Savci S. Investigation of effect of chemical fertilizers on environment. APCBEE Procedia [Internet]. 2012;1:287-292. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212670812000486
  15. 15. Mushtaq Z, Faizan S, Hussain A. Role of microorganisms as biofertilizers. In: Microbiota and Biofertilizers [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. pp. 83-98. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-48771-3_6
  16. 16. Lawal TE, Babalola OO. Relevance of biofertilizers to agriculture. Journal of Human Ecology [Internet]. 2014;47(1):35-43. DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2014.11906737
  17. 17. Malik A, Kim YR, Jang IH, Hwang S, Oh DC, Kim SB. Genome-based analysis for the bioactive potential of Streptomyces yeochonensis CN732, an acidophilic filamentous soil actinobacterium. BMC Genomics [Internet]. 2020;21(1):118. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6468-5
  18. 18. Anandan R, Dharumadurai D, Manogaran GP. An introduction to Actinobacteria. In: Actinobacteria - Basics and Biotechnological Applications London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2016. pp. 1-36. DOI: 10.5772/62329
  19. 19. Kurtbӧke Dİ. Ecology and habitat distribution of actinobacteria. In: Biology and Biotechnology of Actinobacteria. [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 123-149. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60339-1_6
  20. 20. Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, Klenk HP, et al. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of actinobacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews [Internet]. 2016;80(1):1-43. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15
  21. 21. Mawang CI, Azman AS, Fuad ASM, Ahamad M. Actinobacteria: An eco-friendly and promising technology for the bioaugmentation of contaminants. Biotechnology Reports [Internet]. 2021;32:e00679. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2215017X21000953
  22. 22. Schulz D, Beese P, Ohlendorf B, Erhard A, Zinecker H, Dorador C, et al. Abenquines A–D: Aminoquinone derivatives produced by Streptomyces sp. strain DB634. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo) [Internet]. 2011;64(12):763-768. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201187
  23. 23. Rateb ME, Houssen WE, Arnold M, Abdelrahman MH, Deng H, Harrison WTA, et al. Chaxamycins A–D, bioactive ansamycins from a hyper-arid desert Streptomyces sp. Journal of Natural Products [Internet]. 2011;74(6):1491-1499. DOI: 10.1021/np200320u
  24. 24. Wichner D, Idris H, Houssen WE, McEwan AR, Bull AT, Asenjo JA, et al. Isolation and anti-HIV-1 integrase activity of lentzeosides A–F from extremotolerant lentzea sp. H45, a strain isolated from a high-altitude Atacama desert soil. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo) [Internet]. 2017;70(4):448-453. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201678
  25. 25. Nithya K, Muthukumar C, Biswas B, Alharbi NS, Kadaikunnan S, Khaled JM, et al. Desert actinobacteria as a source of bioactive compounds production with a special emphases on Pyridine-2,5-diacetamide a new pyridine alkaloid produced by Streptomyces sp. DA3-7. Microbiological Research [Internet]. 2018;207:116-133. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0944501317306602
  26. 26. Nafis A, Raklami A, Bechtaoui N, El Khalloufi F, El Alaoui A, Glick BR, et al. Actinobacteria from extreme niches in Morocco and their plant growth-promoting potentials. Diversity [Internet]. 2019;11(8):139. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/11/8/139
  27. 27. Toumatia O, Compant S, Yekkour A, Goudjal Y, Sabaou N, Mathieu F, et al. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting properties of Streptomyces mutabilis strain IA1 isolated from a Saharan soil on wheat seedlings and visualization of its niches of colonization. South African Journal of Botany [Internet]. 2016;105:234-239. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0254629915327988
  28. 28. Almuhayawi M, Mohamed M, Abdel-Mawgoud M, Selim S, Al Jaouni S, AbdElgawad H. Bioactive potential of several actinobacteria isolated from microbiologically barely explored desert habitat, Saudi Arabia. Biology (Basel) [Internet]. 2021;10(3):235. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/3/235
  29. 29. Gong Y, Bai JL, Yang HT, Zhang WD, Xiong YW, Ding P, et al. Phylogenetic diversity and investigation of plant growth-promoting traits of actinobacteria in coastal salt marsh plant rhizospheres from Jiangsu, China. Systematic and Applied Microbiology [Internet]. 2018;41(5):516-527. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S072320201830167X
  30. 30. Zhang JW, Zeng RY. Purification and characterization of a cold-adapted α-amylase produced by Nocardiopsis sp. 7326 isolated from Prydz Bay, Antarctic. Marine Biotechnology [Internet]. 2008;10(1):75-82. DOI: 10.1007/s10126-007-9035-z
  31. 31. Cleaver AA, Burton NP, Norris PR. A novel Acidimicrobium species in continuous cultures of moderately thermophilic, mineral-sulfide-oxidizing acidophiles. Applied and Environmental Microbiology [Internet]. 2007;73(13):4294-4299. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02658-06
  32. 32. Busti E, Monciardini P, Cavaletti L, Bamonte R, Lazzarini A, Sosio M, et al. Antibiotic-producing ability by representatives of a newly discovered lineage of actinomycetes. Microbiology [Internet]. 2006;152(3):675-683. Available from: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.28335-0
  33. 33. Bergquist PL, Gibbs MD, Morris DD, Te’o VSJ, Saul DJ, Morgan HW. Molecular diversity of thermophilic cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Ecology [Internet]. 1999;28(2):99-110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1999.tb00565.x
  34. 34. Johnson DB, Bacelar-Nicolau P, Okibe N, Thomas A, Hallberg KB. Ferrimicrobium acidiphilum gen. nov., sp. nov. and Ferrithrix thermotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov.: Heterotrophic, iron-oxidizing, extremely acidophilic actinobacteria. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2009;59(5):1082-1089. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65409-0
  35. 35. Chen MY, Wu SH, Lin GH, Lu CP, Lin YT, Chang WC, et al. Rubrobacter taiwanensis sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, radiation-resistant species isolated from hot springs. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2004;54(5):1849-1855. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.63109-0
  36. 36. Poomthongdee N, Duangmal K, Pathom-aree W. Acidophilic actinomycetes from rhizosphere soil: Diversity and properties beneficial to plants. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo) [Internet]. 2015;68(2):106-114. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ja2014117
  37. 37. Tiago I, Pires C, Mendes V, Morais PV, da Costa M, Veríssimo A. Microcella putealis gen. nov., sp. nov., a gram-positive alkaliphilic bacterium isolated from a nonsaline alkaline groundwater. Systematic and Applied Microbiology [Internet]. 2005;28(6):479-487. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0723202005000494
  38. 38. Luo HY, Wang YR, Miao LH, Yang PL, Shi PJ, Fang CX, et al. Nesterenkonia alba sp. nov., an alkaliphilic actinobacterium isolated from the black liquor treatment system of a cotton pulp mill. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2009;59(4):863-868. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.003376-0
  39. 39. Sorokin DY, van Pelt S, Tourova TP, Evtushenko LI. Nitriliruptor alkaliphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a deep-lineage haloalkaliphilic actinobacterium from soda lakes capable of growth on aliphatic nitriles, and proposal of Nitriliruptoraceae fam. nov. and Nitriliruptorales ord. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2009;59(2):248-253. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.002204-0
  40. 40. Ghauri MA, Khalid AM, Grant S, Grant WD, Heaphy S. Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial isolates from man-made high-pH, high-salt environments and identification of gene-cassette–associated open Reading frames. Current Microbiology [Internet]. 2006;52(6):487-492. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-005-0488-x
  41. 41. Boondaeng A, Ishida Y, Tamura T, Tokuyama S, Kitpreechavanich V. Microbispora siamensis sp. nov., a thermotolerant actinomycete isolated from soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2009;59(12):3136-3139. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.009613-0
  42. 42. Tang X, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Ming H, Nie GX, Yang LL, et al. Actinokineospora soli sp. nov., a thermotolerant actinomycete isolated from soil, and emended description of the genus Actinokineospora. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2012;62(Pt_8):1845-1849. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.035832-0
  43. 43. Jani SA, Chudasama CJ, Patel DB, Bhatt PS. Optimization of extracellular protease production from alkali thermo tolerant actinomycetes: Saccharomonospora viridis SJ-21. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2012;1:84-92
  44. 44. Tseng M, Yang SF, Hoang KC, Liao HC, Yuan GF, Liao CC. Actinomadura miaoliensis sp. nov., a thermotolerant polyester-degrading actinomycete. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2009;59(3):517-520. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.001479-0
  45. 45. Matmoura A, Yekkour A, Boufadi MY, Bouras N, Zitouni A, Mokrane S, et al. Exploration of actinobacteria communities in seawater and sediments of mediterranean basin from Algerian coast displays hight diversity with new taxa and antibacterial potential. Biologia (Bratisl) [Internet]. 2023;78(8):2219-2231. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11756-023-01353-2
  46. 46. Suthindhiran K, Kannabiran K. Diversity and exploration of bioactive marine actinomycetes in the Bay of Bengal of the Puducherry coast of India. Indian Journal of Microbiology [Internet]. 2010;50(1):76-82. DOI: 10.1007/s12088-010-0048-3
  47. 47. Nunoura T, Nishizawa M, Hirai M, Shimamura S, Harnvoravongchai P, Koide O, et al. Microbial diversity in sediments from the bottom of the challenger deep, the Mariana Trench. Microbes and Environments [Internet]. 2018;33(2):186-194. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsme2/33/2/33_ME17194/_article
  48. 48. Franco NR, Giraldo MÁ, López-Alvarez D, Gallo-Franco JJ, Dueñas LF, Puentes V, et al. Bacterial composition and diversity in Deep-Sea sediments from the Southern Colombian Caribbean Sea. Diversity[Internet]. 2020;13(1):10. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/13/1/10
  49. 49. Basyoni MH, Aref MA. Composition and origin of the Sabkha brines, and their environmental impact on infrastructure in Jizan area, Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia. Environment and Earth Science [Internet]. 2016;75(2):105. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12665-015-4913-6
  50. 50. Wu J, Peng Z, Guan T, wei, Yang H, Tian X. Diversity of actinobacteria in sediments of Qaidam Lake and Qinghai Lake, China. Archives of Microbiology[Internet]. 2021;203(6):2875-2885 Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00203-021-02277-8
  51. 51. Zhang M, Wang L, Zhong D. Photolyase: Dynamics and mechanisms of repair of sun-induced DNA damage. Photochemistry and Photobiology [Internet]. 2017;93(1):78-92. DOI: 10.1111/php.12695
  52. 52. Gerday C, Glansdorff N. In: Extremophiles. Vol. 2. London, United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers Co.; 2009. pp. 396
  53. 53. Tamreihao K, Salam N, Ningthoujam DS. Use of Acidophilic or Acidotolerant Actinobacteria for Sustainable Agricultural Production in Acidic Soils. In: Egamberdieva D, et al. editors. Extremophiles in Eurasian Ecosystems: Ecology, Diversity, and Applications, Microorganisms for Sustainability. Vol. 8. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2018; pp. 453-464. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0329-6_17
  54. 54. Yoon JH, Kim IG, Lee MH, Lee CH, Oh TK. Nocardioides alkalitolerans sp. nov., isolated from an alkaline serpentinite soil in Korea. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2005;55(2):809-814. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.63374-0
  55. 55. Jones BE, Grant WD, Duckworth AW, Schumann P, Weiss N, Stackebrandt E. Cellulomonas bogoriensis sp. nov., an alkaliphilic cellulomonad. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2005;55(4):1711-1714. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.63646-0
  56. 56. Tamura T, Ishida Y, Otoguro M, Hatano K, Labeda D, Price NP, et al. Reclassification of Streptomyces caeruleus as a synonym of Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus and reclassification of Streptomyces spheroides and Streptomyces laceyi as later synonyms of Streptomyces niveus. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology [Internet]. 2008;58(12):2812-2814. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.65560-0
  57. 57. Kiran S, Swarnkar MK, Pal M, Thakur R, Tewari R, Singh AK, et al. Complete genome sequencing of protease-producing novel Arthrobacter sp. strain IHBB 11108 using PacBio single-molecule real-time sequencing technology. Genome Announcements [Internet]. 2015;3(2):10-128. DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00346-15
  58. 58. Nishio Y, Nakamura Y, Kawarabayasi Y, Usuda Y, Kimura E, Sugimoto S, et al. Comparative complete genome sequence analysis of the amino acid replacements responsible for the thermostability of Corynebacterium efficiens. Genome Research [Internet]. 2003;13(7):1572-1579. DOI: 10.1101/gr.1285603
  59. 59. Shivlata L, Satyanarayana T. Thermophilic and alkaliphilic actinobacteria: Biology and potential applications. Frontiers in Microbiology [Internet]. 2015;6:1014. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01014/abstract
  60. 60. Dhawi F. The role of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) and their feasibility in hydroponics and vertical farming. Metabolites [Internet]. 2023;13(2):247. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/13/2/247
  61. 61. Argumedo-Delira R, Gómez-Martínez MJ, Mora-Delgado J. Plant growth promoting filamentous fungi and their application in the fertilization of pastures for animal consumption. Agronomy [Internet]. 2022;12(12):3033. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/12/3033
  62. 62. Motaher HM, Sultana F. Application and mechanisms of plant growth promoting fungi (PGPF) for phytostimulation. In: Organic Agriculture [Internet]. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen; 2020. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/organic-agriculture/application-and-mechanisms-of-plant-growth-promoting-fungi-pgpf-for-phytostimulation
  63. 63. Abdel-Lateif K, Bogusz D, Hocher V. The role of flavonoids in the establishment of plant roots endosymbioses with arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi, rhizobia and Frankia bacteria. Plant Signaling & Behavior [Internet]. 2012;7(6):636-641. DOI: 10.4161/psb.20039
  64. 64. Kucho K, ichi, Tamari D, Matsuyama S, Nabekura T, Tisa LS. Nitrogen fixation mutants of the actinobacterium Frankia Casuarinae CcI3. Microbes and Environments [Internet]. 2017;32(4):344-351. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsme2/32/4/32_ME17099/_article
  65. 65. Meena B, Anburajan L, Vinithkumar NV, Kirubagaran R, Dharani G. Biodiversity and antibacterial potential of cultivable halophilic actinobacteria from the deep sea sediments of active volcanic Barren Island. Microbial Pathogenesis [Internet]. 2019;132(April):129-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.043
  66. 66. Subramaniam G, Arumugam S, Rajendran V, editors. Plant Growth Promoting Actinobacteria. Singapore: Springer; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0707-1
  67. 67. Bouizgarne B. Phosphate-Solubilizing Actinomycetes as Biofertilizers and Biopesticides: Bioformulations for Sustainable Agriculture. In: Arora NK, Bouizgarne B, editors. Microbial BioTechnology for Sustainable Agriculture. Microorganisms for Sustainability, 33. Singapore: Springer. 2022. p. 1. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-4843-4_13
  68. 68. Soumare A, Boubekri K, Lyamlouli K, Hafidi M, Ouhdouch Y, Kouisni L. Efficacy of phosphate solubilizing Actinobacteria to improve rock phosphate agronomic effectiveness and plant growth promotion. Rhizosphere. [Internet]. 2021;17:100284 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452219820301968
  69. 69. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J. Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology [Internet]. 2011;3(4):a001438-a001438. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001438
  70. 70. Park S, Kim AL, Hong YK, Shin JH, Joo SH. A highly efficient auxin-producing bacterial strain and its effect on plant growth. Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology [Internet].2021;19(1):179. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1687157X23006030
  71. 71. Hedden P. Gibberellins. In: Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences [Internet]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 411-420. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123948076002197
  72. 72. Tudzynski B. Gibberellin biosynthesis in fungi: Genes, enzymes, evolution, and impact on biotechnology. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology [Internet]. 2005;66(6):597-611. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-004-1805-1
  73. 73. Keswani C, Singh SP, García-Estrada C, Mezaache-Aichour S, Glare TR, Borriss R, et al. Biosynthesis and beneficial effects of microbial gibberellins on crops for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Applied Microbiology [Internet]. 2022;132(3):1597-1615. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jambio/article/132/3/1597/6988784
  74. 74. Boubekri K, Soumare A, Mardad I, Lyamlouli K, Ouhdouch Y, Hafidi M, et al. Multifunctional role of Actinobacteria in agricultural production sustainability: A review. Microbiological Research [Internet]. 2022;261:127059. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0944501322000994
  75. 75. Boukhatem ZF, Merabet C, Tsaki H. Plant growth promoting actinobacteria, the most promising candidates as bioinoculants? Frontiers in Agronomy [Internet]. 2022;4:849911. DOI: 10.3389/fagro.2022.849911/full
  76. 76. Siddikee MA, Chauhan PS, Anandham R, Han GH, Sa T. Isolation, characterization, and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant bacteria derived from coastal soil. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology [Internet]. 2010;20(11):1577-1584. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1007.07011
  77. 77. Romera FJ, García MJ, Lucena C, Martínez-Medina A, Aparicio MA, Ramos J, et al. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) and Fe deficiency responses in dicot plants. Frontiers in Plant Science [Internet]. 2019;10:444126. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00287/full
  78. 78. Yu Y, Gui Y, Li Z, Jiang C, Guo J, Niu D. Induced systemic resistance for improving plant immunity by beneficial microbes. Plants [Internet]. 2022;11(3):386. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/11/3/386
  79. 79. Kesarwani M, Yoo J, Dong X. Genetic interactions of TGA transcription factors in the regulation of pathogenesis-related genes and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology [Internet]. 2007;144(1):336-346. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/plphys/article/144/1/336/6106776
  80. 80. Vesuna AP, Nerurkar AS. Biocontrol impact of AHL degrading actinobacteria on quorum sensing regulated virulence of phytopathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum BR1. Plant and Soil [Internet]. 2020;453(1–2):371-388. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-020-04623-z
  81. 81. Cellini A, Spinelli F, Donati I, Ryu CM, Kloepper JW. Bacterial volatile compound-based tools for crop management and quality. Trends in Plant Science [Internet]. 2021;26(9):968-983. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1360138521001242
  82. 82. Zhang S, Gui C, Shao M, Kumar PS, Huang H, Ju J. Antimicrobial tunicamycin derivatives from the deep sea-derived Streptomyces xinghaiensis SCSIO S15077. Natural Product Research [Internet]. 2020;34(11):1499-1504. DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1493736
  83. 83. Cao P, Li C, Wang H, Yu Z, Xu X, Wang X, et al. Community structures and antifungal activity of root-associated Endophytic Actinobacteria in healthy and diseased cucumber plants and Streptomyces sp. HAAG3-15 as a promising biocontrol agent. Microorganisms [Internet]. 2020;8(2):236. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/2/236
  84. 84. Kaur T, Rani R, Manhas RK. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting potential of phylogenetically new Streptomyces sp. MR14 of rhizospheric origin. AMB Express [Internet]. 2019;9(1):125. DOI: 10.1186/s13568-019-0849-7
  85. 85. El-Shatoury SA, Ameen F, Moussa H, Abdul Wahid O, Dewedar A, AlNadhari S. Biocontrol of chocolate spot disease (Botrytis cinerea) in faba bean using endophytic actinomycetes Streptomyces: A field study to compare application techniques. PeerJ [Internet]. 2020;8:e8582. Available from: https://peerj.com/articles/8582
  86. 86. Hastuti RD, Lestari Y, Suwanto A, Saraswati R. Endophytic Streptomyces spp. as biocontrol agents of rice bacterial leaf blight pathogen (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae). HAYATI Journal of Biosciences [Internet]. 2012;19(4):155-162. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1978301916301504
  87. 87. Javoreková S, Kovácsová S, Medo J, Maková J, Petrová J, Hleba L, et al. Soil amended with organic fertilizers as a source of actinomycetes with high potential as biocontrol agents. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences [Internet]. 2019;8(6):1352-1359. Available from: https://office2.jmbfs.org/index.php/JMBFS/article/view/8878
  88. 88. Allali K, Goudjal Y, Zamoum M, Bouznada K, Sabaou N, Zitouni A. Nocardiopsis dassonvillei strain MB22 from the Algerian Sahara promotes wheat seedlings growth and potentially controls the common root rot pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana. Journal of Plant Pathology [Internet]. 2019;101(4):1115-1125. DOI: 10.1007/s42161-019-00347-x
  89. 89. Cabrera R, García-López H, Aguirre-von-Wobeser E, Orozco-Avitia JA, Gutiérrez-Saldaña AH. Amycolatopsis BX17: An actinobacterial strain isolated from soil of a traditional milpa agroecosystem with potential biocontrol against Fusarium graminearum. Biological Control [Internet]. 2020;147:104285. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1049964420301390
  90. 90. Ramlawi S, Abusharkh S, Carroll A, McMullin DR, Avis TJ. Biological and chemical characterization of antimicrobial activity in Arthrobacter spp. isolated from disease-suppressive compost. Journal of Basic Microbiology [Internet]. 2021;61(8):745-756. DOI: 10.1002/jobm.202100213
  91. 91. Nicolopoulou-Stamati P, Maipas S, Kotampasi C, Stamatis P, Hens L. Chemical pesticides and human health: The urgent need for a new concept in agriculture. Frontiers in Public Health [Internet]. 2016;4:178764. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00148/abstract
  92. 92. Singh H, Naik B, Kumar V, Bisht GS. Screening of endophytic actinomycetes for their herbicidal activity. Annals of Agrarian Science [Internet]. 2018;16(2):101-107. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1512188717300854
  93. 93. Prem Anand K, Suthindhiran K. Screening and Analysis of Actinobacterial Bioherbicides for Weed Management [Internet]. New York, NY: Humana; 2022. 537–544 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1728-1_80
  94. 94. Umurzokov M, Kim YS, Kim HJ, Shin SC, Weiqiang J, Min Cho K, et al. Potential bio-herbicide from Streptomyces sp. KR0005 to control weeds in a horticultural field. Biocontrol Science and Technology [Internet]. 2023;33(4):297-313. DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2023.2167936

Written By

Karthikeyan Prem Anand, Mangalam Achuthananda Jayasri and Krishnamurthy Suthindhiran

Submitted: 20 February 2024 Reviewed: 23 February 2024 Published: 24 June 2024