Different parts of the fermenter with their significant roles.
Abstract
Fermentation is derived from a Latin word fermentum, a process of chemical changes in an organic substrate by the action of microbial enzymes. The science of fermentation is called as zymology, and the first zymologist was Louis Pasteur. Study of fermentation is called as fermentation technology. Fermenter or bioreactor is the heart of fermentation technology where the whole study is involved. It is a container with biomechanical and biochemical environment that controls the transfer of oxygen, nutrient to the cells, and metabolic products from the cells. There are different types of fermenters like stirred tank fermenter, airlift fermenter, bubble column reactor, fluidized-bed reactor, packed bed reactor, and membrane bioreactor. There are different processes such as batch, continuous, and fed batch or semi-continuous. Secondary metabolites are produced either through submerged or solid-state fermentation process during the stationary phase of an organism. These metabolites are showing a rising demand in food, cosmetics, drugs, and other industries. The production of these metabolites can be improved by strain improvement through mutagenesis and r-DNA technologies. This chapter focuses on all these areas in detail.
Keywords
- solid-state fermentation
- submerged fermentation
- fermenter
- secondary metabolites
- biomass
1. Introduction
The fermentation is respiration without air. The word fermentation is a Latin word
Fermentation is used since olden days to preserve and modify foods. For many years fermentation techniques were used without knowing the microbial involvement and mechanisms. Greeks attribute fermentation to one of the gods-Dionysos-a god of fruit fermentations. The first fermentations included the production of beer and fermented milk beverages in 3150 B.C at Babylon, soy sauce in 1000 B.C at China [1]. Fermentation is the natural process in which various microorganisms like yeast, bacteria, and fungi are involved in the exchange of complex substrates into simpler compounds. These compounds are useful to humans on industrial scale [3]. There are different types of fermentation like batch, continuous and fed-batch fermentation, solid-state fermentation, and submerged fermentation. In the presence of oxygen, mixing of substrate takes place in submerged fermentation [4].
Bioreactors are the heart of fermentation technology. Bioreactors are tanks or vessels where the cells or cell-free enzymes convert raw materials into biochemical products [5]. Bioreactors are simple or highly instrumental. It consists of complex pipes, fittings, wires, and sensors [6].
Each bioreactor is different and has some principles. The main aim of designing bioreactor is to consider the required oxygen transfer, low shear stress, and adequate mixing. Nutrients are efficiently provided to the cells, and waste products must be removed. Operating parameters like temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and substrate concentration are easy to control and monitor. Always bioreactor should be simple, inexpensive, and should be easily handled without contamination [7].
The sizes of bioreactor differ generally from shake flask (100–1000 ml) to laboratory scale vessel (1- 50 L) to pilot level (0.3–10 m3) to laboratory scale (2–500 m3) for large-scale production and industrial applications. Lab scale fermenter is typically constructed with the glass, and the pilot scale and industrial scale vessel are made of stainless steel [8]. Bioreactor is of different types; they are stirred tank fermenter, airlift fermenter, bubble column reactor, fluidized-bed reactor, packed bed reactor, and membrane bioreactor.
The most important product categories for fermentation fall into the broad areas of primary and secondary metabolites. Primary metabolites are intermediates of pathways directly involved in growth processes. They are small molecules under 1500 Da in molecular weight. Secondary metabolites are also known as idiolites; their molecular weights are more than 1500 Da and have unusual ring structures. They are not involved in growth processes. The secondary metabolites most commonly indicate antibiotics or anti-infective. These compounds are produced by microorganisms [9].
1.1 Types of fermentation based on substrate
1.1.1 Solid-State Fermentation (SSF)
The fermentation takes place in the support of solid substrate with non-specific, natural state, and low moisture content. The substrate used is nutrient-rich waste that can be reused. Substrates like bran, bagasses, and paper pulp are used as solid substrates in solid-state fermentation. It contains less moisture content; hence, this fermentation technology is good for microorganisms like fungi. It is not suitable for bacteria. This type of fermentation is slow and takes long time [10]. Product yield is high in SSF, and the reason for high yield is unknown. The solid material used in SSF is non-soluble and acts both as physical support and source of nutrients [11]. The primary setup of SSF is the “solid substrate bed” that contains the moist solids and an inter particle void space, and the process is aerobic in nature [12]. SSF is used for the development of bioprocess like bioremediation and biodegradation of hazardous compounds, biotransformation of crops, biopulping, production of biologically active secondary metabolites like antibiotics, alkaloids, plant growth factors, enzymes, etc., [13, 14, 15].
1.1.2 Submerged Fermentation (SmF)
In this fermentation, microorganisms need controlled atmosphere for production of high-quality end products. The substrates used in SmF are liquid media, molasses, waste water, vegetables juices, and soluble sugar to extract bioactive compounds [16]. SmF is mostly in use for the production of polysaccharides. It is also used to grow or to cultivate different bacteria and fungi to obtain intracellular and extracellular polysaccharides [17, 18].
1.2 Types of fermentation based on process
1.2.1 Batch fermentation
These processes are broadly used to produce chemicals, biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and agricultural products. Batch culture is a closed system in which the medium, nutrients, and inoculums are added to the fermenter or bioreactor under aseptic conditions. In this cultivation, a known number of microbial cells are inoculated into the bioreactor containing sterilized nutrient medium. A complete batch cultivation consists of many steps like medium formulation, filling the bioreactor, sterilization in place, inoculation, cultivation, product harvesting, and bioreactor cleaning in place. For ingenious performance of batch cultivation, it is essential to reduce all nonproductive steps except cultivation.
The submerged batch cultivation is used for the production of alcoholic beverages like beer, wine, whisky, brandy, rum, etc., and also used in the production of acidifiers or preservatives like vinegar and lactic acids, amino acids, or sweeteners (Figure 1) [20, 21].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F1.png)
Figure 1.
Batch fermentation (Source: [
1.2.2 Fed-batch cultivation
This process represents semi-open system, and in this system one or more nutrients are gradually added by maintaining aseptic condition. The advantages of fed-batch cultivation are the prolonged product synthesis, to achieve higher cell densities and increase in the yield of product which is proportional to the concentration of biomass and capacity to enhance yield or productivity by controlled addition of nutrients. The fed-batch fermentations are used in large scale for the production of baker’s yeast, pure ethanol (Figure 2) [23].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F2.png)
Figure 2.
Fed-batch fermentation (Source: [
1.2.3 Continuous cultivation
This culture represents an open system in which the nutrients are continuously added to the bioreactor by using aseptic conditions; simultaneously the culture broth is removed at the same time. The advantage of this culture is the opportunity to set up an optimum state for long-term production, the ability to attain stable product quality, and reduce any unrecommended time during the bioreactor operation.
There are some problems encountered due to extensive use of continuous fermentation on a large scale; they are larger possibility of contamination due to pumping of the medium in and out of the fermenter, the danger due to genetic mutations in the production strain in a long-term operation, and additional investments may be required for technical facilities (Figure 3) [25].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F3.png)
Figure 3.
Continuous fermentation (Source: [
2. Bioreactors
Bioreactors are tanks or vessels which convert raw materials into biochemical products or lesser waste byproducts. These reactors are cylindrical, ranging in size from liter to cubic meters, and the capacity also differs depending on the design. It is heart of biotechnological systems that are used for agricultural, environmental, industrial, and medical applications [26]. The bioreactor is used for the production of biomass, for metabolic formation, even for the production of an active cell molecule [27]. Fermentors are having many accessory parts with various important roles during the fermentation process (Table 1)
Sl. No. | Part of fermenter | Function |
---|---|---|
1 | Impellor (agitator) | Continuous stirring of media for homogeneous distribution of oxygen throughout the system preventing cells from settling down |
2 | Sparger (Aerator) | Sparger (Aerator) Introduce sterile air or oxygen to the media during the aerobic fermentation process |
3 | Baffles (vortex breaker) | Provides better mixing by disrupting the vortex formation |
4 | Temperature probe | Measures and monitors changing temperature in the medium during the fermentation process |
5 | Cooling jacket | Maintains temperature throughout the process |
6 | pH probe | Evaluates and monitors the change in pH of the medium |
7 | Level probe | Measures the level of medium within the fermenter |
8 | Foam probe | Detects the presence of the foam |
9 | Acid | Neutralizes the basic environment and maintains the pH |
10 | Base | Neutralizes the acidic environment and maintains the pH |
11 | Sampling point | To acquire samples throughout the process |
12 | Valves | Regulates and limits the flow of liquids and gases |
13 | Control panel | Monitors all parameters in the system |
14 | Inlet air filter | Filtration of air before entering the fermenter |
15 | Exhaust air filter | Prevention of contaminants from escaping |
16 | Rotameter | Measures flow rate of liquid or air |
17 | Dissolve oxygen probe | Measures dissolve oxygen in the fermenter |
18 | Pressure gauge | Measures internal pressure of the fermenter |
2.1 Types of bioreactor or fermenter
2.1.1 Stirred tank fermenter (STF)
This is the more frequently used fermenter, and it is known for its flexibility. The fermenter is cylindrical in shape, the shaft present inside drives the motor, and stir the content inside the tank. It has many benefits like robustness, reliability, and easy operating. The agitator present here is top or bottom driven [28]. Laboratory scale stirrer tank bioreactors are made up with borosilicate glass and stainless steel lid. Its capacity is 1 to 100 L [29]. The stirred tank bioreactors provide high value of mass and heat transfer rates and also good mixing. These system faces problem like high number of variables affect the mass transfer and mixing but most important among these is stirrer speed, number of stirrers, and flow rate of the gas used [30]. The most important role of impellers in STF accomplishes three main tasks like solid suspension, mixing and dissolution of the required atmospheric oxygen into the aqueous phase, and maximizing the interfacial area between gaseous and aqueous phases (Figure 4) [32].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F4.png)
Figure 4.
Stirred tank bioreactor (Source: [
2.1.2 Air lift fermenter (ALF)
ALFs are also known as tower fermenter or reactor. The vessel is cylindrical in shape and in this air is presented at the bottom. ALFs are able to use free or immobilized cells that are suitable for bacteria, yeast, fungi, animal, and plant cells. This fermenter does not contain agitation system unlike other fermenters, but the content inside the vessel is mixed by the air introduced from the bottom. The cell mixture flows all over the column as an implication of the gradient air bubbles. The fluid is separated within two connected regions by means of draft tube or baffles for improving circulation and oxygen transmission and aligning shear forces in the equipment [33]. This fermenter has the benefit of generating liquid mixing and gas transfer without the use of mechanical agitators. The applications of airlift fermenter have increased with the introduction of genetic engineering techniques with the outcome of obtaining new strains of unicellular organisms capable of producing many novel products [34]. To grow yeast rapidly, it is very important to supply oxygen, and also, it is important to remove the heat of the fermentation. One of the experiments succeeded in growing food yeast that is
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F5.png)
Figure 5.
Airlift bioreactor (Source: [
2.1.3 Bubble column reactor
This fermenter or reactor is one of the simplest types, and it is easy to scale up. This belongs to the general class of multiphase reactors and consists of three main categories such as the trickle bed reactor, fluidized-bed reactor, and the bubble column reactor. Basically, it is a cylindrical vessel having a gas distributor at the bottom. The gas is sparged into a liquid phase or liquid–solid suspension in the form of bubbles. These fermenters are used as multiphase reactors in chemical, petrochemical, biochemical, and metallurgical industries [37]. Microorganisms are used to produce industrially important products such as enzymes, proteins, and antibiotics.
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F6.png)
Figure 6.
Bubble column reactor (Source: [
2.1.4 Fluidized-bed reactor (FBB)
FBB has many advantages than other type of reactors, and hence, the use of this reactor has increased. FBB was developed for the biological systems. This reactor constitutes a packed bed containing small-sized particles that can move the fluid. The small particle size accelerates higher rate of oxygen transfer, mass transfer, higher mixing rates, and nutrients availability to the cells [8]. FBB has applied in many industrially important processes. The present applications extend number of physical processes like cooling, heating, drying, sublimation, desublimation, adsorption, desorption, coating and granulation, and many catalytic and noncatalytic reactions. The major advantages of this reactor are: easy to handle and transportation of solids due to temperature distribution due to intensive solids mixing, high transfer of heat between bed immersed heating or cooing surfaces. The disadvantages of this reactor are: solids fluidized with gas require expensive equipment to separate solids and gas, due to high solid velocities, erosion of internals and attri¬tion of solids occurs, possibility of defluidization due to agglomeration of solids making difficult in scaling-up (Figure 7) [42].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F7.png)
Figure 7.
Fluidized-bed bioreactor (Source: [
2.1.5 Packed bed reactor
It is also known as fixed-bed bioreactor and is used in wastewater treatment with biofilms attached. The nutrients are fed from the top or bottom with immobilized biocatalyst. These reactors are commonly treated with the immobilized cells and consist of a bed of packing, made with glass, ceramic, polymer and also exist in various shapes and sizes which allow the flow of fluid from one end to the other [43]. A packed bed reactor has two-phase upward flow used in wide number of multiphase chemical processes [44]. It is a plug flow reactor that belongs to the group where back mixing is not present; but in this reactor small amount of back mixing occurs that affects the attributes of the fermentation (Figure 8) [43].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F8.png)
Figure 8.
Packed bed bioreactor (Source: [
2.1.6 Membrane bioreactor (MBR)
This bioreactor contains hollow fiber system; it is developed for the control of yeast and bacteria. The hollow fibers are made of cellulose acetate or from polysulfone fibers or acrylic copolymer [46]. MBR can transfer the two physical separation processes by filtering the biomass through a membrane [47]. This process is a combination of both biological stage and membrane modules. The specific function of this bioreactor and membrane module is biological degradation of organic pollution and separation of microorganisms from the treated wastewater. The membrane forms a physical barrier for all suspended solids and enables both recycling and also free from bacteria and viruses [48]. The advantages of this bioreactor are biocatalyst regeneration and immediate separation of biomass and the product. The major disadvantages are they are difficult to control and monitor the growth and breakdown of the culture and also extreme growth of microorganisms. The metabolic activity of cells is inhibited by increase of toxic materials or products in the membrane (Figure 9) [50].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F9.png)
Figure 9.
Membrane bioreactor (Source: [
2.2 Secondary metabolites from microorganisms through fermentation
Secondary metabolites produced by microorganisms have a low molecular mass. These are not necessary for growth and serve a variety of ecological roles, working as antibiotics, phytohormones, anticancer agents, enzymes, and producing pigments [51, 52]. Usually, these metabolites are produced during culture’s late growth phase and have unusual structures. Nutrient type and concentration can be changed, including the carbon source, to affect the synthesis of secondary metabolites [53, 54, 55]. Usually, organic substances and secondary metabolites are created when primary metabolites are changed. The period of rapid growth (trophophase) is when secondary metabolites are not formed but are synthesized during the late growth phase of microorganisms (idiophase). The differences between the primary and secondary metabolites are given in Table 2 and Figure 10. The secondary metabolites are vital to human health and nutrition and have many biological properties [56]. A class of extremely significant economic importance includes antibiotics, poisons, pesticides, animal and plant growth hormones, and other medicines. After completion of the microbial growth, they are formed in a fermentation medium, typically during the stationary phase. The generation of secondary metabolites and enzymes has been effectively achieved through the use of solid-state fermentation (SSF), which is associated with simpler downstream processing procedures [57, 58]. Smaller fermenters using SSF have been demonstrated to yield a more stable product while using less energy [54, 59].
Primary metabolite | Secondary metabolite |
---|---|
Produced during the growth phase (Tropophase) of the cell | Produced during no growth phase (Idiophase) of the cell |
Accumulated in large quantities | Accumulated in very small quantities |
Table 2.
Difference between primary and secondary metabolites.
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F10.png)
Figure 10.
Difference between primary and secondary metabolites.
Submerged fermentations (SmF) have been demonstrated to generate more stable products with lower energy requirements in smaller fermenters and still produce secondary metabolites. Recent research has focused on enhancing the production of bioactive secondary metabolites, given their importance in various applications. Once precursors can be obtained, secondary metabolite production can be enhanced in both submerged and solid-state fermentations [8].
2.3 Secondary metabolites: their biosynthesis paths
The growth, development, reproduction, and energy production of organisms do not require secondary metabolites. Because of this, not all microbial species produce these substances. Secondary metabolic pathways are used to create secondary metabolites from primary metabolites like amino acids and acetyl-coenzyme A [60]. Figure 11 illustrates how primary and secondary metabolic pathways are related. Secondary metabolism regulation is a complicated process. Therefore, understanding the metabolic pathways involved is crucial to improving microorganisms’ synthesis of secondary metabolites. The metabolic pathways of malonic acid and shikimic acid are responsible for the synthesis of the precursors of chemical compounds called phenolic. In plants, the shikimic acid pathway is the most significant. In bacteria and fungi, and the malonic acid pathway is an essential source of phenolics. The methylerythritol phosphate pathway or the mevalonic acid pathways are the two metabolic pathways that can be used to synthesize terpenoid precursors. There are mevalonic acid pathways in yeast, fungi, animals, plants, archaea, and some eubacteria. Most bacteria, cyanobacteria, and plant plastids contain the methylerythritol phosphate pathway [60].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F11.png)
Figure 11.
Schematic representation of metabolic pathways involved in the production of secondary metabolites by microorganisms using glucose.
2.4 Solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial metabolites production
Fermentation is classified into submerged fermentation (SmF) and solid-state fermentation (SSF), which is mostly determined by the quantity of water utilized in the process (Table 3). The process of solid-state fermentation (SSF) is widely used to produce microbial metabolites [63]. With the benefit of a high product concentration and very little energy used, SSF is carried out on a solid substrate with low moisture content [64]. The substrate in a solid matrix absorbs the necessary water content in SSF, which provides additional benefits for the growth of microorganisms for the transfer of oxygen. A variety of agricultural wastes are utilized as SSF substrates, including rice straw, corn cobs, wheat straw, rice hulls, and sugarcane bagasse [59]. Since submerged fermentation (SmF) possesses a simpler downstream procedure than solid-state fermentation (SSF), SmF is the preferred method for producing metabolites in the industrial setting. While there is a knowledge gap in the SSF process, there is a possibility of strong and easy control over many factors in the case of SmF. The microbial morphology is more appropriate for generating secondary metabolites in SSF, although SmF is a simpler procedure to perform. Thus, SSF has several benefits, including simple gaseous transport, low water consumption, utilization of cellulosic waste, pH control, and requirement for smaller fermenters, which reduces the work needed for downstream processing [60, 65].
Factor | Submerged state fermentation | Solid-state fermentation |
---|---|---|
Substrates | Uses soluble substrates (sugars) | Insoluble substrates such as starch, cellulose, pectins, and lignin are used |
Aseptic conditions | Heat sterilization and aseptic control | Vapor treatment, non-sterile conditions |
Water | A high volume of water is consumed and effluent is discarded | Limited consumption of water; low Aw, no effluent is formed |
Metabolic heating | Easy control of temperature | Low heat transfer capacity |
Aeration | Limitation of soluble oxygen. High level of air required | Easy aeration and high surface exchange air/substrate |
pH control | Easy pH control | Buffered solid substrates |
Mechanical agitation | Good homogenization | Static condition required |
Scale up industrial equipment | Industrial equipment is available | Need for engineering and new design equipment |
Inoculation | Easy inoculation, continuous process | Spore inoculation, batch process |
Contamination | Risk of contamination for single-strain bacteria | Risk of contamination for low-rate growth fungi |
Energetic consideration | High energy consuming | Low energy consuming |
Volume of equipment | High volumes and cost technology | Low volumes and cost technology |
Effluent and pollution | High volumes of polluting effluents | No effluent; less pollution |
Concentration of substrate/products | 30–80 g/l | 100/300 g/l |
The standard industrial technique, known as a stirred tank reactor (SmF), involves growing microorganisms in a liquid medium to produce the required output [66]. Large-scale industrial enzyme synthesis is favored by this method since it is easier to manage and promotes superior microbial growth (Figure 12). Since secondary metabolites are generally secreted in the fermentation broth, SmF is appropriate for synthesizing these molecules, which are required to be used in liquid form [3]. While SmF has advantages, recent evidence indicates that SSF has a large impact on productivity, leading to higher yields and improved product characteristics compared to SmF. Precursor availability can enhance the ability of both submerged and solid-state fermentation to produce secondary metabolites [59].
![](http://cdnintech.com/media/chapter/89539/1718268422-1397245013/media/F12.png)
Figure 12.
Solid-state and submerged fermentation to produce value-added products [
The same substrate can be utilized extremely slowly and steadily over a prolonged fermentation period in SSF. Thus, this method facilitates the prescribed release of nutrients. Fermentation techniques involving fungi and microorganisms that require restricted moisture content are most suited for the use of SSF [68]. However, it cannot be utilized in fermentation processes involving microorganisms like bacteria that need high aw (water activity). While fungi are mainly interested in SSF processes, bacteria and yeasts are equally involved in SmF and SSF. The food and beverage processing industries play an essential role in bacteria and yeasts in SmF. Because of their physiological, biochemical, and enzymatic characteristics, filamentous fungi are most suitable for SSF and are widely used in ensiling, composting, and oriental food industries [69]. The group of microorganisms involved in both SSF and SmF techniques are shown in Table 4.
Microorganisms | SSF | SmF |
---|---|---|
Bacteria | ||
Composting natto, α-amylase | Enzymes (α-amylase, polygalcturonase, phytase, etc.) | |
Ensiling, food | Pesticide degradation | |
Lactic acid bacteria | Ensiling, food | Fermented foods (yogurt, lacto-pickle, sausage, etc.) |
Composting | Xenobiotic degradation | |
Composting | ||
Fungi | ||
Composting | ||
Cheese | Penicillin | |
Shiitake mushroom | — | |
Mushroom | — | |
Food, enzymes (glucoamylase) | Food enzymes (glucoamylase, amylopullulanase) | |
Cassava tape | ||
Bioinsecticide | Bioinsecticide | |
Composting, lignin, degradation | — | |
Composting, food, enzymes, organic acid | Food, enzymes, organic acid | |
Composting biological control, bioinsecticides | Cellulase | |
Yeasts | ||
Casava tape | — | |
Alcoholic beverages, ethanol | Alcoholic beverages |
2.5 Microbial metabolites produced in solid-state and submerged fermentations
Microbial metabolites are often produced through submerged and solid-state fermentation (SSF). The efficiency of SSF in a particular process will depend on the kind of microorganisms used. Filamentous fungi like
2.5.1 Bacteria
Numerous cellulase-producing bacteria, including
Enzymes | Microorganisms | Substrate | Productivity | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSF | SmF | SSF | SmF | |||
Esterase | Sugar beet pulp | Media containing cinnamic acid | 20 nkat/mg dry wt. | 0.4 nkat/ml | [18] | |
Cellulase | Wheat bran | Mandel’s liquid media | 60.5 FPU | 28 FPU | [18] | |
Invertase | Polyurethane foam | Basal media | Higher | Lower | [18] | |
Phytase | Wheat bran | PDB basal media | Higher | Lower | [18] | |
Tannase | Polyurethane foam | Production media | 12,000 IU/l | 2500 IU/l | [18] | |
L-Asparaginase | Soybean meal | Yeast extract medium | 49.23 U/ml | 24.16 U/ml | [18] | |
Amylase | Oil cakes, wheat bran, bagasse | Starch broth | Around 50,000 U/g | 400 U/ml | [18] | |
Xylanase | Thermotolerant | Corn cob and wheat bran | Corn cob and yeast extract | 6.18 U/g | 16.13 U/ml | [44] |
Amylase | Wheat bran | — | 250 U/g | — | [50] | |
Phytase | — | Malt yeast extract media | — | 91.85 U/ml | [45] |
Table 5.
Enzyme production from microorganisms.
2.5.2 Fungi
To produce cellulase, a variety of fungi have been grown in SSF, where the basal mineral salt medium is added to moisten the substrate. These include
2.5.3 Yeast
Throughout the nineteenth century, natural dyes constituted the primary source of color for textiles. Synthetic dyes have almost entirely superseded natural colors. Synthetic dyes are beautiful because of their wide color range, increased repeatability, improved dying quality, and financial advantages. But it is commonly recognized that some artificial colors are hazardous to the environment and have detrimental effects. Natural pigments or dyes are a valuable substitute for possibly hazardous synthetic ecosystems [89]. Red pigments produced by
3. Conclusion
Fermentation is a potential strategy for microbial metabolite production, and it can be used to produce a variety of primary metabolites such as amino acids, nucleotides, organic acids, and vitamins. Acetic acid (Acetobacter), lactic acid (Lactobacillus), alcohol and carbon dioxide (yeast), and other main metabolites can be used to categorize fermentation. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a common technique for the developing of microbial metabolites, and it is carried out on a solid substrate using certain microorganisms (yeasts and fungi) that are grown on a moist, solid, non-soluble organic material that serves as a source of nutrients and support for the microorganisms’ growth when free-flowing water is absent or almost absent. The success of applying SSF to a specific process is affected by the nature of the microorganisms. The majority of microorganisms utilized in SSF are filamentous fungi like
References
- 1.
Chojnacka K. Fermentation products. Chemical Engineering and Chemical Process Technology. 2010; 5 :189-200 - 2.
Smid EJ, Hugenholtz J. Functional genomics for food fermentation processes. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 2010; 1 :497-519 - 3.
Subramaniyam R, Vimala R. Solid state and submerged fermentation for the production of bioactive substances: A comparative study. International Journal of Natural Sciences. 2012; 3 (3):480-486 - 4.
Joshi R, Sharma V, Kuila A. Fermentation technology: current status and future prospects. In: Principles and Applications of Fermentation Technology. Beverly: Wiley; 2018. pp. 1-13 - 5.
Schaechter M, Lederberg J. The Desk Encyclopedia of Microbiology. New York: Elsevier, Academic Press; 2004, 1149 p - 6.
Cinar A, Parulekar SJ, Undey C, Birol G. Batch fermentation: modeling: monitoring, and control. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2003 - 7.
Zhong JJ. Recent advances in bioreactor engineering. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2010; 27 :1035-1041 - 8.
Gaikwad V, Panghal A, Jadhav S, Sharma P, Bagal A, Jadhav A, et al. Designing of Fermenter and its utilization in food industries. Preprints; 2018 - 9.
Seidel A, editor. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Wiley-Interscience; 2006 - 10.
Babu KR, Satyanarayana T. Production of bacterial enzymes by solid state fermentation. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 1996; 55 (5-6):464-467 - 11.
Hoogschagen M, Zhu Y, Van As H, Tramper J, Rinzema A. Influence of wheat type and pretreatment on fungal growth in solid-state fermentation. Biotechnology Letters. 2001; 23 :1183-1187 - 12.
Mitchell DA, Pandey A, Sangsurasak P, Krieger N. Scale-up strategies for packed-bed bioreactors for solid-state fermentation. Process Biochemistry. 1999; 35 (1-2):167-178 - 13.
Kashyap P, Sabu A, Pandey A, Szakacs G, Soccol CR. Extra-cellular L-glutaminase production by Zygosaccharomyces rouxii under solid-state fermentation. Process Biochemistry. 2002;38 (3):307-312 - 14.
Brand D, Pandey A, Roussos S, Soccol CR. Biological detoxification of coffee husk by filamentous fungi using a solid state fermentation system. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2000; 27 (1-2):127-133 - 15.
Soares M, Christen P, Pandey A, Soccol CR. Fruity flavour production by Ceratocystis fimbriata grown on coffee husk in solid-state fermentation. Process Biochemistry. 2000;35 (8):857-861 - 16.
Inui M, Vertes AA, Yukawa H. Advanced fermentation technologies. In: Biomass to Biofuels: Strategies for Global Industries. Wiley; 2010. pp. 311-330 - 17.
Xiao JH, Xiao DM, Xiong Q , Liang ZQ , Zhong JJ. Nutritional requirements for the hyperproduction of bioactive exopolysaccharides by submerged fermentation of the edible medicinal fungus Cordyceps taii . Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2010;49 (2):241-249 - 18.
Nieto IJ. Biotechnological cultivation of edible macrofungi: An alternative for obtaining nutraceutics. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología. 2012; 30 (1):1-8 - 19.
Li J, Ban Q , He J, Jha AK. Metabolic pathways of hydrogen production in fermentative acidogenic microflora. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012; 22 (5):668-673 - 20.
Paulová L, Patáková P, Brányik T. Advanced fermentation processes. Engineering Aspects of Food Biotechnology. 2013:89-110. ISBN 978-1-4398-9545-0 - 21.
Campbell I. Yeast and fermentation. In: Russell I, editor. Whisky Technology, Production and Marketing. London: Academic Press; 2003. pp. 115-150 - 22.
Lee DG, Jeon JM, Yang YH, Jin YS, Yoon JJ. The pH-stat butyric acid feeding strategy coupled with gas-stripping for n-butanol production by Clostridium beijerinckii . Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2020;11 :1077-1084 - 23.
Borowiak D, Miskiewitz T, Miszezak W, Cibis E, Krzywonos M. A straight forward logistic method for feeding a fed-batch baker’s yeast culture. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2012; 60 :36-43 - 24.
Agustriyanto R. Model Identification of Continuous Fermentation under Noisy Measurements. Atlantis Press; 2015 - 25.
Branyik T, Vicente A, Dostalck P, Teixeira J. A review of flavor formation in continuous beer fermentation. Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2008; 114 :3-13 - 26.
Spier MR, Vandenberghe LPDS, Medeiros ABP, Soccol CR. Application of different types of bioreactors in bioprocesses. In: Bioreactors: Design, properties and applications. Nova Science Publishers; 2011. pp. 53-87 - 27.
Bhattacharyya BC, Banerjee S, Ghosh TK. Bioreactors: Functions in fermentation processes. In: Pandey A, Larroche C, Soccol CR, Dussap CG, editors. Advances in Fermentation Technology. New Delhi: Asiatech Publishers, Inc.; 2008. pp. 172-201 - 28.
Soetaert W, Vandamme EJ, editors. Industrial biotechnology: sustainable growth and economic success. Weinheim: John Wiley & Sons; 2010 - 29.
Ali S, Haq IU, Qadeer MA, Iqbal J. Production of citric acid by Aspergillus niger using cane molasses in a stirred fermentor. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2002;5 (3):19-20 - 30.
Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: An overview. Biotechnology Advances. 2009; 27 (2):153-176 - 31.
Garcia-Onhoa F, Santos VE, Gomez E. Stirred tank bioreactors. Comprehensive Biotechnology. 2011:179-198 - 32.
Puthli MS, Rathod VK, Pandit AB. Gas–liquid mass transfer studies with triple impeller system on a laboratory scale bioreactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2005; 23 (1):25-30 - 33.
Veera UP, Kataria KL, Joshi JB. Gas hold-up profiles in foaming liquids in bubble columns. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2001; 84 (3):247-256 - 34.
Wood LA, Thompson PW. Applications of the air lift fermenter. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1987; 15 :131-143 - 35.
Al-Mashhadani MKH, Wilkinson SJ, Zimmerman WB. Airlift bioreactor for biological applications with microbubble mediated transport processes. Chemical Engineering Science. 2015; 137 :243-253 - 36.
Ichii T, Takehara S, Konno H, Ishida T, Sato H, Suzuki A, et al. Development of a new commercial-scale airlift fermentor for rapid growth of yeast. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering. 1993; 75 (5):375-379 - 37.
Degaleesan S, Dudukovic M, Pan Y. Experimental study of gas-induced liquid-flow structures in bubble columns. AICHE Journal. 2001; 47 (9):1913-1931 - 38.
Arcuri EJ, Slaff G, Greasham R. Continuous production of thienamycin in immobilized cell systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1986; 28 (6):842-849 - 39.
Abufalgha AA, Pott RWM, Clarke KG. Quantification of oxygen transfer coefficients in simulated hydrocarbon-based bioprocesses in a bubble column bioreactor. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 2021; 44 (9):1913-1921 - 40.
Federici F, Petruccioli M, Miller MW. Enhancement and stabilization of the production of glucoamylase by immobilized cells of Aureobasidium pullulans in a fluidized-bed reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1990;33 :407-409 - 41.
Li X, Yang Q , Zhang Y, Zheng W, Yue X, Wang D, et al. Biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol in a fluidized bed reactor with immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium . Water Science and Technology. 2010;62 (4):947-955 - 42.
Werther J. Fluidized-bed reactors. In: Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley; 2000 - 43.
Wang G, Zhang W, Jacklin C, Freedman D, Eppstein L, Kadouri A. Modified CelliGen-packed bed bioreactors for hybridoma cell cultures. Cytotechnology. 1992; 9 :41-49 - 44.
Mazzarino I, Occhetti M, Baldi G, Sicardi S. Performance of a packed-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Communications. 1989; 75 (1):225-240 - 45.
Tekere M, Jacob-Lopes E, Zepka LQ. Microbial bioremediation and different bioreactors designs applied. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2019:1-19. 978-1-78984-039-1 - 46.
Raj AE, Karanth NG. Fermentation technology and bioreactor design. In: Food Science and Technology. Vol. 148. New York: Marcel Dekkar; 2006. p. 33 - 47.
Judd S. The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends in Biotechnology. 2008; 26 (2):109-116 - 48.
Marrot B, Barrios-Martinez A, Moulin P, Roche N. Industrial wastewater treatment in a membrane bioreactor: A review. Environmental Progress. 2004; 23 (1):59-68 - 49.
Barreiros AM, Rodrigues CM, Crespo JPSG, Reis MM. Membrane bioreactor for drinking water denitrification. Bioprocess Engineering. 1998; 18 (4):297 - 50.
Chang HN, Furusaki S. Membrane bioreactors: present and prospects. In: Bioreactor Systems and Effects. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. pp. 27-64 - 51.
Bhatla SC, Lal MA. Secondary metabolites. In: Plant physiology, development and metabolism. Vol. 5. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. pp. 765-808 - 52.
Twaij BM, Hasan MN. Bioactive secondary metabolites from plant sources: Types, synthesis, and their therapeutic uses. International Journal of Plant Biology. 2022; 13 (1):4-14 - 53.
Ruiz B, Chavez A, Forero A, Garcia-Huante Y, Romero A, Sánchez M, et al. Production of microbial secondary metabolites: Regulation by the carbon source. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2010; 36 (2):146-167 - 54.
Fouillaud M, Dufossé L. Microbial secondary metabolism and biotechnology. Microorganisms. 2022; 10 (1):123 - 55.
Singh BP, Rateb ME, Rodriguez-Couto S, Polizeli MdLTdM LW. Editorial: Microbial secondary metabolites: Recent developments and technological challenges. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019; 10 :914 - 56.
Behera SS, Ray RC, Das U, Panda SK, Saranraj P. Microorganisms in Fermentation. In: Learning Materials in Biosciences. Springer; 2019. pp. 1-39. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16230-6_1 - 57.
Mosunova O, Navarro-Muñoz JC, Collemare J. The biosynthesis of fungal secondary metabolites: From fundamentals to biotechnological applications. Encyclopedia of Mycology. 2020; 2021 (2):458-476. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.21072-8 - 58.
Kumar V, Ahluwalia V, Saran S, Kumar J, Patel AK, Singhania RR. Recent developments on solid-state fermentation for production of microbial secondary metabolites: Challenges and solutions. Bioresource Technology. 2021; 323 :124566 - 59.
Robinson T, Singh D, Nigam P. Solid-state fermentation: A promising microbial technology for secondary metabolite production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2001; 55 :284-289 - 60.
Méndez-Hernández JE, Rodríguez-Durán LV, Páez-Lerma JB, Soto-Cruz NO. Strategies for supplying precursors to enhance the production of secondary metabolites in solid-state fermentation. Fermentation. 2023; 9 (9):804 - 61.
Panda SK, Saranraj P, Sudhanshu S, Ray BRC, Das U. Essentials in Fermentation Technology. Springer; 2019 - 62.
Mienda BS, Idi A, Umar A. Microbiological features of solid state fermentation and its applications-An overview. Research in Biotechnology. 2011; 2 (6):21-26 - 63.
Srivastava N, Srivastava M, Ramteke PW, Mishra PK. Solid-state fermentation strategy for microbial metabolites production: An overview. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2019; 1 :345-354 - 64.
Maruyama JI, Ohnuma H, Yoshikawa A, Kadokura H, Nakajima H, Kitamoto K. Production and product quality assessment of human hepatitis B virus pre-S2 antigen in submerged and solid-state cultures of Aspergillus oryzae . Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2000;90 (1):118-120 - 65.
Suryanarayan S. Current industrial practice in solid state fermentations for secondary metabolite production: The biocon India experience. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2003; 13 (2-3):189-195 - 66.
Thakur N, Bhalla TC. Enzymes and their significance in the industrial bioprocesses. In: InBasic Biotechniques for Bioprocess and Bioentrepreneurship. Academic Press; 2023. pp. 273-284 - 67.
Abdul Manan M, Webb C. Modern microbial solid state fermentation technology for future biorefineries for the production of added-value products. Biofuel Research Journal. 2017; 4 (4):730-740 - 68.
Behera SS, Ray RC. Solid state fermentation for production of microbial cellulases: Recent advances and improvement strategies. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016; 86 :656-669 - 69.
Shaktimay K, Datta TK, Ray RC. Optimization of thermostable α-amylase production by Streptomyces erumpens MTCC 7317 in solid-state fermentation using cassava fibrous residue. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2010;53 :301-309 - 70.
Yafetto L. Application of solid-state fermentation by microbial biotechnology for bioprocessing of agro-industrial wastes from 1970 to 2020: A review and bibliometric analysis. Heliyon. 2022; 8 (3):e09173 - 71.
Lizardi-Jiménez MA, Hernández-Martínez R. Solid state fermentation (SSF): Diversity of applications to valorize waste and biomass. 3 Biotech. 2017; 7 (1):44 - 72.
Phitsuwan P, Laohakunjit N, Kerdchoechuen O, Kyu KL, Ratanakhanokchai K. Present and potential applications of cellulases in agriculture, biotechnology, and bioenergy. Folia Microbiologica. 2013; 58 :163-176 - 73.
Juturu V, Wu JC. Microbial cellulases: Engineering, production and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014; 33 :188-203 - 74.
El-Bakry M, Abraham J, Cerda A, Barrena R, Ponsá S, Gea T, et al. From wastes to high value added products: Novel aspects of SSF in the production of enzymes. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2015; 45 (18):1999-2042 - 75.
Heck JX, Flôres SH, Hertz PF, Ayub MA. Optimization of cellulase-free xylanase activity produced by Bacillus coagulans BL69 in solid-state cultivation. Process Biochemistry. 2005;40 (1):107-112 - 76.
Rezaei F, Joh LD, Kashima H, Reddy AP, VanderGheynst JS. Selection of conditions for cellulase and xylanase extraction from switchgrass colonized by Acidothermus cellulolyticus . Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2011;64 :793-803 - 77.
Kurt AS, Cekmecelioglu D. Bacterial cellulase production using grape pomace hydrolysate by shake-flask submerged fermentation. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 2023; 13 (8):6981-6988 - 78.
Elumalai P, Lim JM, Park YJ, Cho M, Shea PJ, Oh BT. Agricultural waste materials enhance protease production by Bacillus subtilis B22 in submerged fermentation under blue light-emitting diodes. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 2020;43 :821-830 - 79.
Deswal D, Khasa YP, Kuhad RC. Optimization of cellulase production by a brown rot fungus Fomitopsis sp. RCK2010 under solid state fermentation. Bioresource Technology. 2011; 102 (10):6065-6072 - 80.
Tan YX, Mok WK, Chen WN. Potential novel nutritional beverage using submerged fermentation with Bacillus subtilis WX-17 on brewers’ spent grains. Heliyon. 2020;6 (6):e04155 - 81.
D'Souza PS, Mansy TK, Preethi TC, Gunashree BS. Tamarindus indica seed induced tannase production fromAspergillus niger . Biomedicine. 2022;42 (4):752-756 - 82.
Shivanna GB, Venkateswaran G. Phytase production by Aspergillus niger CFR 335 andAspergillus ficuum SGA 01 through submerged and solid-state fermentation. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014 :392615 - 83.
Gunashree BS, Venkateswaran G. Effect of different cultural conditions for phytase production by Aspergillus niger CFR 335 in submerged and solid-state fermentations. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2008;35 (12):1587 - 84.
Gaykawad SS, Ramanand SS, Blomqvist J, Zimmermann B, Shapaval V, Kohler A, et al. Submerged fermentation of animal fat by-products by oleaginous filamentous fungi for the production of unsaturated single cell oil. Fermentation. 2021; 7 (4):300 - 85.
Kapri M, Singh U, Behera SM, Srivastav PP, Sharma S. Nutraceutical augmentation of agro-industrial waste through submerged fermentation using Calocybe indica . LWT. 2020;134 :110156 - 86.
Du L, Gao B, Liang J, Wang Y, Xiao Y, Zhu D. Microparticle-enhanced Chaetomium globosum DX-THS3 β-d-glucuronidase production by controlled fungal morphology in submerged fermentation. 3 Biotech. 2020;10 :1-8 - 87.
Venkatachalam M, Shum-Chéong-Sing A, Dufossé L, Fouillaud M. Statistical optimization of the physico-chemical parameters for pigment production in submerged fermentation of Talaromyces albobiverticillius 30548. Microorganisms. 2020;8 (5):711 - 88.
Ogidi CO, Ubaru AM, Ladi-Lawal T, Thonda OA, Aladejana OM, Malomo O. Bioactivity assessment of exopolysaccharides produced by Pleurotus pulmonarius in submerged culture with different agro-waste residues. Heliyon. 2020;6 (12):e05685 - 89.
Bechtold T, Mussak R, Mahmud-Ali A, Ganglberger E, Geissler S. Extraction of natural dyes for textile dyeing from coloured plant wastes released from the food and beverage industry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2006; 86 (2):233-242 - 90.
Nagia FA, El-Mohamedy RS. Dyeing of wool with natural anthraquinone dyes from Fusarium oxysporum . Dyes and Pigments. 2007;75 (3):550-555 - 91.
Velmurugan P, Hur H, Balachandar V, Kamala-Kannan S, Lee KJ, Lee SM, et al. Monascus pigment production by solid-state fermentation with corn cob substrate. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2011; 112 (6):590-594 - 92.
Gowthami GA, Gunashree BS. Isolation, characterization and optimization of Cystobasidium minutum for phytase production. Biomedicine. 2023;43 (01):329-334 - 93.
Gowthami GA, Gunashree BS. Characterization of native and mutant strains of Rhodotorula gracilis for phytase production. Mukt Shabd Journal. 2023;7 (2):777-794 - 94.
Li X, Lin Y, Kong H, Wang Z. Screening of ultraviolet-induced thermotolerant yeast mutants and their performance. Fermentation. 2023; 9 (7):608 - 95.
Li Q , Yi P, Zhang J, Shan Y, Lin Y, Wu M, et al. Bioconversion of food waste to crayfish feed using solid-state fermentation with yeast. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023; 30 (6):15325-15334 - 96.
Azevedo MA, Vieira-Neta MD, do Nascimento LP, da Silva GF, Vicente JG, Duarte IC. Potential brewer’s spent grain as a carbon source alternative for biosurfactant production by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (LBP4). Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2024;12 (1):111594 - 97.
de Oliveira AP, Silvestre MA, Alves-Prado HF, Rodrigues A, da Paz MF, Fonseca GG, et al. Bioprospecting of yeasts for amylase production in solid state fermentation and evaluation of the catalytic properties of enzymatic extracts. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2015; 14 (14):1215-1223