Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Diversity and Function of Mycorrhizal Fungi

Written By

YingWu Shi, XinXiang Niu, Hongmei Yang, Ming Chu, Huifang Bao, Ning Wang, Faqiang Zhan, Xuanqi Long, Rong Yang, Qing Lin and Kai Lou

Submitted: 27 February 2024 Reviewed: 02 April 2024 Published: 03 July 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114937

Unveiling the Mycorrhizal World IntechOpen
Unveiling the Mycorrhizal World Edited by Everlon Rigobelo

From the Edited Volume

Unveiling the Mycorrhizal World [Working Title]

Prof. Everlon Cid Rigobelo

Chapter metrics overview

9 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

With the progress of science and technology and the deepening of people’s understanding of mycorrhizal fungi, the diversity and function of mycorrhizal fungi have attracted attention of scholars, and the research on mycorrhizal application technology has been strengthened. In order to grasp the latest progress and current situation of mycorrhizal fungi diversity research, and clarify the achievements in the research and application fields of mycorrhizal fungi diversity and function, this study summarizes the latest research progress of mycorrhizal fungi diversity and function, which are discussed. The morphological characteristics, anatomical characteristics, host plant species and mycorrhizal fungal types, the species and genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, the origin of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and the influencing factors of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity are discussed. A lot of work has been done on the species, geographical distribution, ecological characteristics, and resource investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi. More and more ECM fungal resources have been detected and identified. The ecological function of mycorrhizal fungi is manifested in the aspects of plant community and plant ecosystem stability by improving ecosystem productivity. Mycorrhizal fungi can form symbionts with plants, enter the food web as food, and affect terrestrial ecosystems.

Keywords

  • mycorrhizal fungi
  • arbuscular mycorrhizal
  • ectomycorrhizal
  • diversity
  • function

1. Introduction

Mycorrhiza is a symbiont formed by plant roots and some fungi in soil. It is widely found in terrestrial ecosystems, including forests, fields, and grasslands. Mycorrhiza plays an important role in the ecosystem [1, 2, 3]. More than 80% of terrestrial ecosystems can form mycorrhiza with mycorrhizal fungi. This symbiosis is beneficial to both host plants and fungi. According to the morphological characteristics, anatomical characteristics, host plant species, and mycorrhizal fungi types, mycorrhizal fungi can be divided into arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhiza (ECM). Ectoendomycorrhiza, orchid mycorrhiza, ericoid mycorrhiza, monotropoid mycorrhiza, and arbutoid mycorrhiza. Among them, ectomycorrhizal (ECM) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) are the most diverse and widely distributed mycorrhizal types.

As early as 1885, the German botanist and plant physiologist B. Frank first discovered mycorrhiza, that is, the symbiosis of special fungi (mycorrhizal fungi) in the soil and plant roots [4], which opened a series of studies on the structure, type, formation mechanism, physiological and ecological functions of mycorrhizal fungi, and mycorrhizal biotechnology, forming an independent discipline-mycorrhizology [5, 6].

Advertisement

2. Diversity of mycorrhizal fungi

According to different host types and symbiotic characteristics, mycorrhizal fungi are divided into seven categories [5]: ectomycorrhizal (ectomycorrhizal; eCM), arbuscular mycorrhiza (arbuscular mycorrhiza; aM), ectoendomycorrhizas (ectoendomycorrhizas; eEM), orchid mycorrhiza (orchid mycorrhiza; oRM), arbutoid mycorrhiza (arbutoid mycorrhiza; aRM), ericoid mycorrhiza (ericoid mycorrhiza; eRM), and monotropoid mycorrhiza; mM) seven categories. According to the criteria of root tissue morphological differentiation and host plant lineage, mycorrhiza is divided into four main types: arbuscular mycorrhiza (arbuscular mycorrhiza; aM), ectomycorrhizal (ectomycorrhizal; eCM), ericoid mycorrhiza (ericoid mycorrhiza; eRM), and orchid mycorrhiza (orchid mycorrhiza; oRM). In mycorrhizal symbionts, mycorrhizal fungi absorb water and mineral elements in the soil through mycelia and provide them to host plants. At the same time, host plants provide carbohydrates to mycorrhizal fungi in return. In addition, the functions of mycorrhiza in the ecosystem also include affecting the construction of aboveground plant communities, regulating soil carbon sequestration, nutrient cycling, ecosystem stability, and so on [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Mycorrhiza is widely distributed in the terrestrial environment. Under natural conditions, more than 80% (92% of the family level) of terrestrial plant roots can be infected by mycorrhizal fungi to form mycorrhiza [12]. Although most plants can form mycorrhizae, the distribution of mycorrhizae is not uniform. Ectomycorrhizae (2% of the total), arbuscular mycorrhizae (72%), and orchid mycorrhizae (10%) are the main mycorrhizae.

2.1 Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) is the earliest and most widely distributed and is known as the mother of plant root symbionts. Therefore, it has attracted extensive attention from mycorrhizal scholars. Most (about 80%) terrestrial plant species can form this mycorrhiza [13]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM fungi), which can infect plant roots to form AM, are obligate nutritional fungi, and the carbohydrates required for their growth and development are all derived from host plants [6]. The structure of AM fungi is composed of two parts: inner root and outer root. The intraradical hyphae, vesicles, and arbuscules formed by AM fungi in the root cortex are located in the root cortex. The structures such as dendric or cauliflower-like branches belong to the root structure of AM fungi, while the extraradical hyphae and spores located in the root and soil together constitute its extra root structure.

2.1.1 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) is a symbiont formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (arbuscular mycorrhizas fungi, AMF) and plant roots. In addition to individual families such as Juncaceae, Caryophyllaceae, and Brassicaceae, which cannot or are not easy to form AM symbionts, most plants can be infected by AM fungi [6]. AM is also known as endomycorrhizas because it forms a symbiotic structure in the cortical tissue of plant roots. Its structural components include plant roots, soil hyphae outside the root, spores, auxiliary body, and intracellular and intercellular hyphae, vesicles, and arbuscules inside the root. AM was once known as vesicle-arbuscular mycorrhizas (VAM), but later studies found that only about 80% of AM fungi form vesicular structures, so the term VAM was discarded [14].

The species classification of AM fungi has always been an important aspect of AM fungal diversity research. By 2015, 254 AM fungal morphological species had been recorded worldwide (http://schuessler.userweb.mwn.de/amphylo/; statistics dated February 2015), which can be divided into 4 orders, 11 families, and 17 genera. Among them, there were 121 species of Glomeraceae, 40 species of Acaulosporaceae, 11 species of Diversisporaceae, 9 species of Ambisporaceae, 7 species of Pacisporaceae, 6 species of Claroideoglomeraceae, 5 species of Gigasporaceae, 4 species of Sacculosporaceae, 3 species of Paraglomeraceae, 2 species of Archaeosporaceae, and 1 species of Geosiphonaceae. At the same time, great progress has been made in the study of AM fungal species diversity in China. According to incomplete statistics, 113 species of AM fungi belonging to 7 genera have been isolated in China, including 22 species of Aeaulopora, 3 species of Entrophospora, 3 species of Archaeospora, 65 species of Glomus, 1 species of Paraglomus, 4 species of Gigaspora, and 15 species of Scutellospora [15].

Since 1974, the number of researchers on AM fungi has gradually increased. The corresponding researchers have described the morphological characteristics of some AM fungi and established the family Endogone. AM fungi are classified as Endogone [16]. In 1875, Berkeley and Broome [17] established the genus Sclerocystis. In 1889, the genus Sclerocystis and the genus Endocystis were placed under the family Endocystis established by Paoletti in 1889. In 1922, Bucholtz [18] indicated that the family Endogonaceae belongs to the order Mucormycota. In 1974, Gerdeman and Trappe [19] newly described Acaulospora and Megasporangium and reclassified Endomycaceae into seven genera: Glomus, Endogone, Modicella, Gigaspora, Acaulospora, Glaziella, and Sclerocystis. In 1979, Benjimin moved the family Enterobacteriaceae from Mucor to Endogonales [20]. The biggest change in the systematic classification of AM fungi was in 1999–2000, Morton and Benny [21] established Glomals, which consists of 2 suborders, 3 families, and 6 genera. Almeida and Schenck [22] transferred all the strains except Sclerocystis coremioides into Glomus. In 2000, Redecker [23] transferred them into Glomus and abolished Sclerocystis. Schublerr [24] analyzed the 18S r DNA sequence of AM fungi in 2002 and removed AM fungi from Zygomycota and reestablished Glomeromycot. The reason why the classification system of AM fungi changes so frequently is the limitation of morphological identification. The same species in different countries and regions have different life histories, and the results of morphological structure in different environments are quite different. It is this instability that promotes the direction of systematic classification gradually tends toward molecular methods. Oehl et al. [25] divided AM fungi into 1 class, 5 orders, 14 families, and 26 genera by combining modern molecular biology techniques and traditional morphological identification methods. So far, less than 250 species of AM fungi have been described, and only 341 species of AM fungi have been obtained by environmental DNA analysis. Such a small amount of AM fungi can form a symbiotic relationship with more than 200,000 plants on the earth, which means that AM fungi do not have strict host specificity [26]. Therefore, the classification of AM fungi is still under development, and the classification of taxonomy is inconclusive.

AMF belongs to Glomeromycota in the classification system. According to the latest classification system of AMF [27], there are 1 class (Glomeromycetes), 4 orders (Glomerales, Diversisporales, Paraglomerales, Archaeosporales), 11 families (Glomeraceae, Claroideoglomeraceae, Gigasporaceae, Acaulosporaceae, Pacisporaceae, Diversisporaceae, Sacculosporaceae, Paraglomeraceae, Geosiphonaceae, Ambisporaceae, Archaeosporaceae), 29 genera (Dominikia, Funneliformis, Glomus, Kamienskia, Rhizophagus, Sclerocystis, Septoglomus, Claroideoglomus, Bulbospora, Cetraspora, Dentiscutata, Gigaspora, Intraornatospora, Paradentiscutata, Racocetra, Scutellospora, Acaulospora, Pacis-pora, Corymbiglomus, Diversispora, Otospora, Redeckera, Tricispora, Sacculospora, Paraglomus, Geosiphon, Ambispora, Archaeospora, Entrophospora), and about 300 species.

2.1.2 Inheritance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

The sum of the genetic information carried by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is the genetic diversity of AM fungi. It was found that there were a large number of genetic variations among AM fungal populations and within populations, even within a single bosom. This shows that AM fungi have rich genetic diversity [28]. The generation of genetic diversity is based on changes in DNA genetic material, mainly reflected in gene polymorphism [29, 30]. Sanders et al. first reported the genetic information of Glomus fungi: DNA sequence polymorphism [31]; Lloyd-Macgilp et al. [32] studied and analyzed the ITS gene sequences of rDNA among five Glomus mosseae strains with different geographical origins, and found that there were sequence polymorphisms. Redecker et al. [23] studied the molecular system of AM fungi by PCR amplification of the 18S rRNA gene of G.spinuosum and Scleroystis coremioides and RFLP analysis of the products by restriction endonuclease digestion. Developmental status; Antoniolli et al. [33] amplified the ITS region of G.mosseae and Gi.margarita isolated from pasture after a single culture, and found that there were differences between the ITS regions of the two strains, and the degree of genetic variation of G.mosseae was greater than that of Gi.margarita. Pawlowska and Taylor [34] found that there were three kinds of ITS region variations in each nucleus of G.etunicatum. The genetic variation of AM fungi exists not only in ribosomal genes but also in the gene coding region, which is universal [34]. Kuhn et al. [35] found that the highly conserved binding protein gene (BiP) in fungi was mutated in the single offspring of G.intraradices; Corradi et al. [30] found that there were differences in the number of copies of the gene.

Changes in genetic materials can cause changes in AM fungal metabolism and differences in morphological characteristics. Bever and Morton [36] showed that nuclear migration and hyphal fusion occurred during the division of the mycelium of Sc.pellucida, resulting in nuclear recombination, which further led to a variety of differences in the single culture and the shape and size of the five single-saturated offspring were not the same. Koch et al. [37] reported that the AFLP amplification bands of G.intraradices populations were quite different under the same environmental conditions. These genetic variations have led to differences in physiological and symbiotic functions within AM fungal populations, such as differences in the length of AM fungal hyphae that further translate into differences in nutrient uptake by symbiotic plants [38].

At present, there are two hypotheses about the genetic variation of AM fungi. Kuhn et al. [35] reported that the genetic variation of AM fungi is likely to be due to the fusion of hyphae in the asexual reproduction of AM fungi, resulting in the formation of new hyphae and spores containing nuclei with different genetic components, and the frequency of intranuclear gene recombination is not high, that is, the genetic variation of AM fungi is distributed in different nuclei. However, Pawlowska and Taylor [34] believed that the abundant genetic variation in AM fungi was due to ploidy, that is, all the variations were contained in the mononuclear cells of AM fungi. Therefore, the genetic structure of AM fungi needs to be further studied. These rich genetic diversity should be considered in the study of physiological and ecological molecular biology of AM fungi, because they may be converted into functional diversity [28]. At the same time, the genetic diversity of AM fungi laid the foundation for the application of molecular biology analysis technology in the classification and identification of AM fungi and made the classification of AM fungi more scientific and perfect.

The diversity of AM fungi is the result of the combined action of various factors. Host plant types, plant compounds, and environmental factors can affect the diversity of AM fungi. Tawaraya et al. [39] confirmed that the host plant type of AM fungi is one of the important factors affecting the distribution of AM fungal species. The composition and infection rate of AM fungal community vary with different host plants. Some scholars believe that the influence of plant species on the diversity of AM fungal community is mainly due to the effect of plant root metabolites. Alkaloids and flavonoid metabolites synthesized by plants will affect the germination of AM fungal spores. The research directions of AM fungal diversity at home and abroad have different emphases. Most of the articles focus on soil physical and chemical properties and AM fungal diversity. Zhang Haibo [40] RDA analysis showed that plant species had a certain effect on the difference of AM fungal community structure. The composition of AM fungal community in different plant rhizospheres was different, indicating that AM fungi had specific selection for host plants. Yang Xiuli et al. [41] found that the distribution of AM fungal species richness in different seasons in the same forest type was regular, and the highest species richness was in August. The distribution of AM fungal spore density in different seasons also showed a certain regularity, and the highest spore density was in September. Combined with the research on the diversity of AM fungi in different forest types, it was found that the composition of AM fungi in different forest types was different, the spore density was different, and the dominant species were different. AM fungi and forests have undergone a long period of evolution, and the entire ecosystem has now entered a complete and orderly positive feedback virtuous cycle. The use of AM fungi to promote plant colonization growth and vegetation restoration should consider its species preference. Therefore, studying the relationship between AM fungi and forest types is helpful in protecting AM fungi resources and forest resources.

2.1.3 Origin of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

Based on existing fossil evidence, AM symbionts originated in the Ordovician (Ordovician) at least 460 million years ago and play an important role in the early plant login process and subsequent evolution of terrestrial plants [12, 42, 43]. Plants face many challenges in the early stage of landing, such as arid terrestrial conditions, nutrient-poor soil, and strong ultraviolet radiation. With the help of AM fungi, plants can effectively absorb soil mineral nutrients and have the ability to resist adverse environmental conditions [6]. Therefore, the emergence of AM fungi is considered to be an important prerequisite for the successful early landing of plants [43]. Although this assertion can be corroborated by recent research, the study found that the earliest origin of a class of plant land money (liverwort; it originated about 430 million years ago) and can be infected by AM fungi, which significantly enhances the nitrogen and phosphorus absorption capacity of Marchantia polymorpha, and increases its growth rate and fitness [44]. However, how was the early plant-AM fungal mutualism established? This remains to be further explored and scientifically answered.

AM fungi is an ancient asexual reproduction of the biological groups [45], in its long-term evolution process, multinuclear genome slowly emerged, that is, there are multiple nuclei appear at the same time in its hyphae and asexual spores, a single spore can appear up to tens of thousands of nuclei [35, 46]. In the process of reproduction of AM fungi, many nuclei can be transferred to the mycelium or spores of the offspring, so that AM fungi have extremely high individual genetic diversity, and often have high genetic diversity in terms of individual spores [31, 34, 47]. It is precisely because of its asexual reproduction and multinuclear characteristics, although the species differentiation rate of AM fungi is slow, it also suggests that it may have a faster functional differentiation rate, and the intraspecific functional diversity of AM fungi should be high [48, 49, 50]. At the same time, the existence of multinuclear genomes is bound to bring greater resistance to the molecular identification of AM fungal species that are currently widely used [31]. High genetic variability to some extent hinders us from identifying AM fungal diversity through DNA sequences. Although the characteristics of asexual reproduction of AM fungi have been widely recognized, new research evidence shows that a large number of specific genes related to sexual reproduction are present in AM fungi [51, 52]. Although these sexual reproduction-related genes cannot prove that sexual reproduction exists in AM fungi, they provide new ideas and directions for future research, which will help us fully understand AM fungi and understand their genetic and evolutionary processes [53]. In the recently completed genome sequencing of the representative species of AM fungi (Rhizophagus irregularis), 28,232 genes were found [54]. Further annotation and analysis of these genes open the door for future research on the genetics, evolution, symbiotic mechanism, and physiological function of AM fungi.

2.1.4 Influencing factors of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity

Because of the mutual selection relationship between AM fungi and host plants, and the strong adaptability of AM fungi to different ecological environments, the diversity of AM fungi shows obvious differences in different ecosystems [26, 55, 56] and is affected by many factors at the same time.

2.1.4.1 Host plants

Because AM fungi rely on obtaining nutrients from host plants to maintain their own survival and reproduction, the structure and diversity of AM fungal communities are bound to be affected by host plant communities [57]. A large number of studies have shown that the community structure of host plants will affect the structure, function, and diversity of AM fungal community in root-soil to a certain extent [5859]. Hausmann et al. found that the nutritional needs of host plants at different stages of growth will affect the AM fungal community structure in their roots [60].

2.1.4.2 Soil factors

AM fungi exist in the root tissue and rhizosphere soil of host plants, so the salinity, pH, and nutrient elements of soil will affect the structure and diversity of AM fungal community. At the same time, AM fungi will also change the physical and chemical factors of rhizosphere soil [60]. Soil nutrients can affect the colonization, growth, distribution, and spore production of AM fungi. Among them, phosphorus is the most closely related to AM fungi in all soil nutrients. Studies have shown that when the content of available phosphorus in rhizosphere soil is low, that is, under the condition of phosphorus as a limiting condition, the addition of phosphorus fertilizer will appropriately promote the reproduction of AM fungi. However, when enough phosphorus fertilizer is added and the phosphorus limiting conditions of the soil are lifted, the competition of the aboveground part of the plant will be intensified, resulting in a decrease in the carbon content transported by the plant to the underground roots and mycorrhiza, thus inhibiting the spore production and colonization of AM fungi. In turn, it affects the structure and diversity of AM fungal communities [6162]. Similar to phosphorus, soil nitrogen also has an important effect on the community structure and diversity of AM fungi [63]. The simultaneous changes of nitrogen and phosphorus will change the distribution of carbon content in the aboveground and underground parts of the plant, which will reduce the diversity of AM fungal communities [64, 65].

2.1.4.3 Climatic factors

Climatic factors mainly affect the growth and reproduction of AM fungal community through temperature, light, and water conditions. Studies have shown that soil temperature can directly affect the ability of AM fungal community to infect host plants. When the ambient temperature is low, AM fungi will produce more vesicle structure. However, when the temperature increases, the colonization rate and mycelial structure of AM fungi increase significantly [66].

2.1.4.4 Geographical factors

There are significant differences in the structure and diversity of AM fungal communities in different environmental soils, mainly due to changes in altitude, elevation, and latitude. Geographical factors mainly affect AM fungi by indirectly affecting other environmental factors such as light, precipitation, and temperature. Cai Xiaobu et al. [67] found that the diversity and spore density of AM fungi increased with the increase of altitude in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau at an altitude of 3700–5220 m.

2.2 Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi

ECM is an ectomycorrhizal fungus that forms mycorrhizal symbionts with the roots of host plants. The hyphae of ECM fungi will wrap the surface of the host root tip to form a mantle, but their hyphae do not penetrate the interior of the plant cells, but only extend and grow between the cells to form a Hartig net. Emanating hyphae are sparse or dense, with special mycorrhizal symbiotic structures such as fungal mantle, Hartig net, and epitaxial hyphae, which are called ectomycorrhizal fungi [68, 69]. These symbiotic fungi are called ectomycorrhizal fungi (EcMF). This symbiotic relationship of ECM fungi in plant roots has been widely studied. According to statistics, there are more than 20,000 fungi in the world, which can form ECM symbionts with 6200 plants [70]. This symbiotic relationship has a wide impact on forest ecosystems. Fagaceae [71] (Fagaceae), Pinaceae [72] (Pinaceae), Betulaceae [73] (Betulaceae), Myrtaceae [74] (Myrtaceae), Juglandaceae [75] (Juglandaceae), Salicaceae [76] (Salicaceae), and other dominant tree species in forest ecosystems have important economic and ecological values. The symbiotic relationship between these plants and ECM fungi is one of the key factors for their normal growth, production, and reproduction [77].

The formation of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) usually includes four stages: contact (recognition), invasion, expansion, and emergence. These stages are usually completed in a short time, and there is no obvious boundary between them [78]. In general, the formation of ECM is initiated by the proliferation of fungi on the root surface caused by the root exudates of the host plant. The mechanism of fungal invasion into plant tissues involves a variety of complex biological processes, including the stacking and interweaving of hyphae, as well as the expansion and enclosure of hyphal networks [79]. After the formation of the mantle, the fungi continue to expand inward, through the root epidermis into the cortex tissue and grow rapidly, forming a Hastelloy network, which marks the completion of the invasion stage. In this process, fungi inhibit the defense response of host plants by secreting effector proteins [80]. It was found that there was signal communication in the symbiosis process between plants and ECM fungi. Plants transmit signals by secreting flavonoids [81, 82], while ECM fungi transmit signals by secreting auxin [83, 84]. Auxin can enter root cells, induce plant auxin signaling pathway, inhibit root growth, and induce lateral root formation. In addition, symbiotic fungi can release sesquiterpenes to promote plant lateral root formation, which is independent of the host plant auxin signaling pathway. Therefore, the mechanism of ECM formation is very complex, involving the interaction of multiple biological processes and signaling pathways [85].

Researchers have conducted extensive research on ECM, mainly involving the morphology of ECM, the promoting effect of ECM fungi on the growth of host plants, the diversity of ECM fungal fruiting bodies, and taxonomy. At present, it is known that about 280 genera [86, 87, 88] more than 20,000 species [77] of fungi can form ECM with 250–300 genera and 6000–7000 species of plants [89], mainly distributed in Ascomycota (Turberaceae, Gloniaceae, Helvellaceae, and Pezizaceae). Russulaceae, Cantharellaceae, Thelephoraceae, Atheliaceae, Pisolithaceae, Sclerodermataceae, Cortinariaceae, Clavariaceae, Boletaceae, Inocybaceae, Sebacinaceae, Amanitaceae, and Hymenogastraceae of Basidiomycota [90].

2.2.1 Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in China

Chinese scholars have made great progress in the investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi resources. The species, geographical distribution, and ecological characteristics of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the main afforestation tree species and important timber tree species in various forest areas have been basically clarified [91]. According to incomplete statistics, nearly 600 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi have been reported in China, belonging to 2 subphyla, Ascomycotina and Basidiomycotina, 28 families, and 63 genera. Chinese scholars have carried out many investigations on pine species, mainly including Pinus yunnanensis, Pinus massoniana, Pinus densiflora, Pinus sylvestris var.mongolia, Pinus taiwanensis, and Pinus koraiensis. More than 184 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi have been reported. It belongs to 20 families and 41 genera. Among them, Russula, Inocybe, Tomentella, Cortinarius, Amanita, Boletus, and Pisolithus are common fungi. In addition, some fungi also form ectomycorrhiza with coniferous forest types, such as larch (Larix) and spruce (Picea) and some broad-leaved forest types, such as Quercus, Eucalyptus, and Populus. Wang et al. [92] used the method of field ecology to investigate the ectomycorrhizal fungi of important afforestation tree species such as Pinus tabulaeformis, Pinus massoniana, and Pinus sylvestris in Northeast China, Central China, South China, and East China. A total of 19 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi were found.

In Northeast China, Zhao et al. [93] identified 51 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi of Russulaceae in the Changbai Mountain area through specimen collection and investigation. Meng Fengrong and Shao Jingwen [91] investigated the ectomycorrhizal fungi of 12 main coniferous forest types in the main forest areas of Changbai Mountains, Xiaoxing ‘an Mountains, and Daxing ‘an Mountains by means of field investigation and specimen collection and identification. There were 163 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to 43 genera and 19 families. Wang Shuqing and Xu Lihua [94] classified and identified 76 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with larch, Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica, Pinus koraiensis, Pinus tabulaeformis, poplar, and other major timber species in Northeast China through field investigation and indoor microscopic examination. Tu Liguer et al. [95] obtained 100 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in five typical vegetation communities of broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in Changbai Mountain by sampling survey method and morphological classification method. Wang [96] found that there were 16 species of underground ectomycorrhizal fungi of Quercus mongolica in Bingla Mountain of Liaoning Province by combining morphological and molecular biological methods. Song Fuqiang et al. [97] preliminarily identified 21 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Pinus koraiensis in Xiaoxing ‘an Mountains, belonging to 5 families and 8 genera. Lang Qinglong et al. [98] investigated the ectomycorrhizal fungal resources of oak trees in Fengcheng area of Liaoning Province after more than 100 field investigations and specimen identification, and initially identified 35 species in this area. Wang Hui et al. [99] determined that there were 36 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to 7 families and 13 genera in Dandong area of Liaoning Province by fruiting body investigation and specimen identification. Among them, 29 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi were associated with Quercus mongolica. Cui and Mu [100] studied the resources of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the typical distribution area of Tilia amurensis in Heilongjiang Province by morphological and anatomical characteristics, and preliminarily divided them into 18 types.

In Northwest China, Tang et al. used the investigation and identification of fruiting bodies, observation of external morphology and anatomical structure to investigate and study 35 species of poplar in Shaanxi Province, and identified 9 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi [101]. Tian Maolin [102] investigated and identified 63 species of Russulaceae ectomycorrhizal fungi in Gansu Province. Wu et al. reported 78 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Shaanxi Province through field investigation and specimen collection [103]. Wu Chonghua et al. found that 28 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi were obtained by investigating the ectomycorrhizal fungi of the main tree species such as Abies fargesii and Larix chinensis in Taibai Mountain Nature Reserve [104]. Pu Xun reported that there were 77 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi symbiotic with trees in Longnan area of Gansu Province, belonging to 14 families and 28 genera [105]. Xun [106] used plant taxonomy and ecological methods to identify 37 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Helan Mountain, Ningxia [106]. Zhang Ruqin et al. [107] studied the ectomycorrhizal fungi under pine-oak mixed forest, larch forest, Pinus tabulaeformisforest, and Pinus armandii forest in Huoditang forest area of Qinling Mountains by field investigation, specimen collection, isolation, and identification. A total of 29 species, 16 genera, and 10 families [107] were identified. Qi et al. reported 28 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the middle part of Qinling Mountains (Shaanxi section of Qinling Mountains) by means of field investigation, specimen collection, culture, and isolation [108]. Ding et al. found that there were seven species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Zibai Mountain Nature Reserve of Qinling Mountains by collecting specimens, morphological structure, and microscopic observation [109]. Through field investigation, specimen collection, and molecular biology, Guli Ahmati et al. [110] conducted a comprehensive investigation and study on ectomycorrhizal fungi in the Habahe plain area of Altay, Xinjiang, and identified 14 genera (21 species) of ectomycorrhizal fungi [110].

In Central China, Chen Zuohong et al. investigated the ectomycorrhizal fungi of Amanita in Mangshan Nature Reserve of Hunan Province by special investigation and collecting a large number of specimens. A total of 25 species have been identified [111]; Li Jianzong discovered two new records of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Amanita) in the mixed forest of Pinus massoniana and broad-leaved trees in Changsha, Hunan Province, and made specimens [112]; Cui et al. collected specimens and identified 31 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi of Russula in Henan mountainous area [113]. Zhang Linping et al. found 28 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Jiangxi Tongboshan Nature Reserve by macroscopic characteristics, microscopic observation, and specimen identification [114]. Li Jianzong et al. identified 25 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Shunhuangshan Nature Reserve by investigating and collecting specimens [115]. Li Jianzong et al. [116] found that there are 39 species of fungi that form ectomycorrhizal fungi with trees in Liubuxi Nature Reserve of Hunan Province by investigating and collecting specimens. Huang et al. [117] used morphological and molecular biological identification methods to investigate the ectomycorrhizal fungi of Pinus massoniana in lead-zinc mining areas in Central China and found that there were 47 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi symbiotic with Pinus massoniana [117].

In North China, Qin et al. [118] investigated Castanea mollissima in Huairou County, Yanshan Mountains, Beijing by collecting fruiting bodies, and identified 13 genera and 29 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi symbiotic with Castanea mollissima [118]. Cai Huaifu et al. collected specimens and indoor identification, and reported 7 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi collected in some areas of Beijing Songshan Nature Reserve [119].; Tian et al. identified 38 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi of Russulaceae in Chifeng, Inner Mongolia [120]. Fan Yongjun et al. used morphological anatomy and molecular biology methods to study the ectomycorrhizal fungi of Betula platyphylla in Inner Mongolia, and identified 13 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with it [121].; Bai Shulan et al. identified 78 species (15 families, 31 genera) of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Daqing Mountain and 79 species (15 families, 32 genera) in Manhan Mountain by outdoor investigation and indoor observation [122]; Fan et al. studied and investigated Qinghai spruce in Helan Mountain area of Inner Mongolia from the perspective of morphology, anatomy, and molecular biology, and identified 11 different types of ectomycorrhizal fungi [123]. Bai et al. collected fruiting bodies for morphological and anatomical observation and initially believed that there were 163 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi distributed in Daqing Mountain, Inner Mongolia [124].

In South China, Gong Mingqin and Chen Yu [125] obtained 11 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi from Pinus and Anacardium in South China by combining outdoor investigation with indoor observation [125]. Rao Benqiang studied the ectomycorrhizal fungi of Pinus massoniana in Wuyishan Nature Reserve by macroscopic, microscopic, and ultrastructural methods. A total of 78 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Pinus massoniana were observed [126]. Qian et al. collected a total of 123 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi (84 species were identified) after 6 years of investigation on the plant community of Tsuga chinensis in Wuyishan Nature Reserve through macroscopic morphological observation, microscopic and ultrastructural observation [127].

In East China, Li Haibo et al. investigated the resources of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Lishui, Zhejiang Province through field investigation, collection, isolation, and culture, and identified 38 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi [128]. Ke Lixia and Liu Birong investigated the resources of ectomycorrhizal fungi under pine forests in Huangshan area by means of field ecological investigation, indoor observation, and microscopic examination, and identified 43 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi [129]. Chen Tianxing and Chen Shuanglin obtained 49 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Purple Mountain of Nanjing by collecting specimens and morphological taxonomy [130].

In Southwest China, Bi Guochang et al. investigated the ectomycorrhizal fungi in alpine coniferous forests in Northwest Yunnan by field investigation and collection of fruiting body specimens and identified more than 140 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to 3 genera [131]. He Shaochang has collected and identified 138 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Guizhou trees [132]. Tan Fanghe and Wang Yunzhang [133] investigated the resources of ectomycorrhizal fungi under pine forests in Sichuan Province by investigating fungal fruiting bodies, collecting specimens, indoor observation, and microscopic examination, and identified 9 families, 18 genera, and 50 species [133]. Yu Fuqiang et al. [134] collected fruiting body specimens and observed microscopic characteristics, and investigated the ectomycorrhizal fungi under the main Pinus yunnanensis forests in Yunnan Province. In total, 211 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to 39 genera and 27 families were identified.

Zhu Tianhui et al. conducted a systematic investigation and study on the species of ectomycorrhizal fungi of Eucalyptus in Sichuan Province through field investigation and indoor identification. It was found that there were 17 types of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Eucalyptus, belonging to 9 families and 11 genera [135]; Liu Xiaojiao et al. collected specimens and consulted relevant literature, and sorted out 23 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi of Russulaceae in Sejila Mountain, Tibet [136]; Zhou Guanglin et al. collected specimens and indoor identification, and found that there are 37 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Chongqing Jinyun Mountain National Nature Reserve [137]; Luo et al. found that there were 68 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Pinus massoniana in Kaili City, Guizhou Province through field investigation [138].

2.2.2 Taxonomy of ectomycorrhizal fungi

At first, scientists mainly identified the species of ECM fungi by morphology and studied their diversity. In recent years, molecular biology techniques have been widely used in the study of ectomycorrhizal fungi, and more and more ECM fungi have been identified. According to the latest statistics, there are about 20,000–25,000 species of ECM fungi worldwide, mainly from Basidiomycota and Ascomycota, and a small amount from Zygomycota [139].

According to the life form and phylogenetic characteristics of ECM fungi, scientists divided all ECM fungi into 66 evolutionary branches (lineages), including 37 evolutionary branches of Basidiomycetes, 27 evolutionary branches of Ascomycota, and 2 evolutionary branches of Zygomycota [140]. Wurzburger et al. identified that Suillus tomentosus, Cenococcum geophilum, and an ECM fungus from Russula were widely distributed in the swamp forest transition zone in southeastern Alaska [141]. Smith et al. studied the ECM fungal community of three leguminous tree species in tropical rainforests. A total of 118 ECM fungi were identified and divided into four branches [142]. Lamit et al. identified 367 ECM fungi in three different elevation gradients in the forests of Northern Iran, and the abundance of ectomycorrhizal fungi decreased with increasing altitude [143]. Bonito et al. identified 44 genera of ECM fungi in Carya illinoinensis (Carya illinoinensis) [144].

In recent years, Chinese scholars have also applied molecular biotechnology to the study of ECM fungal diversity. The dominant genera of ECM fungi in Pinus koraiensis pure forest in Northeast China were Sebacina, Suillus, Meliniomyces, Russula, Tomentella, Rhizopogon, and Amphinema [145]. The ECM fungi of natural Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica of different age classes in Honghuaerji belong to 2 phyla, 4 classes, 12 orders, 26 families, and 43 genera. The proportion of dominant genera of ECM fungi in different age classes is different [146]; the ECM fungi in the rhizosphere soil of Betula platyphylla in Inner Mongolia came from 2 phyla, 6 classes, 11 orders, 25 families, and 38 genera [147]; ECM fungi in 15 Pinus tabulaeformis forests in 9 provinces of Northern China belong to 2 phyla, 5 classes, 13 orders, 24 families, and 41 genera [148]; the ECM fungi of the main oaks in the Qinling Mountains and the Loess Plateau belong to 2 phyla, 6 classes, 13 orders, 28 families, and 48 genera [149]; the ECM fungi associated with Betula albo-sinensis in the Qinling Mountains belong to 6 orders, 8 families, and 9 genera, and the ECM fungi associated with Larix gmelinii come from 4 orders, 11 families, and 11 genera [150]; eCM fungi belong to 3 phyla, 8 classes, 18 orders, 23 families, and 18 genera in Fagaceae of tropical mountain rainforest [71].

2.2.3 Investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi resources

2.2.3.1 Investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi resources abroad

For more than a century, mycorrhizal researchers at home and abroad have done a lot of work in the investigation of ECM resources, and more and more ECM fungal resources have been detected and identified. The diversity of ECM fungi has been investigated abroad for a long time. As early as 1889, Noack tried to detect the resources of mycorrhizal fungi by tracing the mycelium of fruiting bodies [151]. Subsequently, Melin [152, 153] preliminarily speculated that there was a surprising number of ECM fungal diversity under natural conditions by investigating the occurrence of fruiting bodies in the field [152]. Since the 1990s, mycorrhizal research has become a hot spot. Systematic and large-scale investigations have confirmed the speculation of Melin et al. mycorrhizal researchers also continue to predict the global ECM fungal diversity based on the types of ECM that have been found. First, according to statistical analysis by Molina et al. [154], he predicted that there are about 5000–6000 ECM fungi in the world [153]. As many fungal species have been shown to form ECM with plants, Taylor and Alexander [155] reestimated the diversity of ECM fungi and believed that there are about 7000–10,000 ECM fungi in the world [154]. In recent years, with the use of molecular biology methods for ECM diversity research, this number has further expanded. The latest statistics show that about 20,000–25,000 fungi can form ECM with about 6000 higher plants around the world [139, 155]. The current research results show that ECM fungi are derived from three fungal phyla, namely Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Zygomycota [156, 157]. The proportion of Basidiomycota is the largest, reaching about 95%, followed by Ascomycota, about 4.8%, and only a small part of the fungi of Zygomycota can form ECM [154]. According to the life form and phylogenetic characteristics of ECM fungi, Tedersoo et al. divided all ECM fungi into 66 evolutionary branches (lineages), including 37 evolutionary branches of Basidiomycetes, 27 evolutionary branches of Ascomycota, and 2 evolutionary branches of Zygomycota [87].

2.2.3.2 Investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi resources at home and abroad

The study of ECM fungi in China started late but developed rapidly. In the early stage, the investigation of ECM resources in China was mainly based on one or more tree species on the local scale. Bi Guochang et al. conducted a systematic investigation of ECM fungal resources in alpine coniferous forests in Northwestern Yunnan using a combination of standard plot surveys and route surveys. A total of 33 genera and 140 species of ECM fungi were identified [131]; Chen Lianqing found that a total of 27 fungi can form ectomycorrhizal fungi with Pinus massoniana [158]; Gong Mingqin and Chen Yu investigated ECM fungi from two hosts in South China, and found 11 ECM fungi [125]. Zhao Zhong et al. [159] investigated the ECM of Populus tomentosa in the central plains and found a total of 14 ECM fungi [159]. Tang et al. [101] investigated 35 ECM fungal resources of poplar in Shaanxi Province and identified 9 ECM fungi. Wu et al. [104] investigated the ectomycorrhizal resources in the Taibai Mountain Nature Reserve and identified 28 species of ectomycorrhizal fungi, belonging to 6 families and 18 genera [104]. Meng and Shao investigated the underground ECM of the main coniferous forests in Changbai Mountain, Lesser Khingan Mountains, and Greater Khingan Mountains in Northeast China, and finally identified 19 families, 43 genera, and 163 species of ECM fungi by means of indoor identification [91]. Bai Shulan conducted a systematic investigation of ECM fungal resources in Daqingshan area of Inner Mongolia. A total of 163 ECM fungi were found, belonging to 18 families and 41 genera [160]; Fan Yongjun analyzed ECM fungal resources of four host plants in Inner Mongolia from the perspective of morphology and anatomy and finally identified 48 mycorrhizal morphological types [161].

Later, with the development of molecular biology techniques, Chinese mycorrhizal researchers kept pace with the times and quickly used this technique to study ECM diversity, and the spatial scale of the study also expanded from the early local scale to the regional scale. Zhang found that 19 kinds of fungi can form ECM with Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica [162]. Wang Qin et al. studied the diversity of ECM fungi in temperate Quercus liaotungensis and subtropical Castanopsis fargesii, and detected 66 and 17 OTUs from each of the two host plants [163, 164]. Ding et al. found 36 ECM fungi in the subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in Southwest China [165]; Yi et al. used high-throughput sequencing to detect a total of 143 OTUs in Qinghai spruce forest in Helan Mountain, Inner Mongolia, belonging to 20 families and 25 genera [166]. Geng Rong et al. [167, 168] investigated the ECM fungi of Picea asperata and Quercus aliena var.acuteserrata in Xinjiashan forest area of Qinling Mountains by combining morphological and ITS sequencing methods. The results showed that 37 and 51 species of ECM fungi were detected, belonging to 10 families and 14 genera, respectively [167, 168]. Gao et al. used 454 pyrosequencing to find 393 OTUs in different succession stages of forests in Gutian Mountain, Zhejiang Province, belonging to 21 ECM fungal evolutionary lineages [169]. Wen Zhugui et al. conducted a systematic study on the ECM fungi of Pseudotsuga sinensis, an endangered species in China. A total of 66 fungi were identified to form ECM with Pseudotsuga sinensis [170]; Han Qisheng et al. detected a total of 60 ECM fungal OTUs in the alpine timberline species of Larix gmelinii forest in Taibai Mountain, belonging to 16 families and 28 genera [171]. Wang et al. combined morphological and molecular identification to carry out large-scale sampling and research on ECM fungal communities in five different habitat types of Quercus liaotungensis forests in Northern China. A total of 220 OTUs were detected to belong to 28 ECM fungal evolutionary branches [172].

Advertisement

3. Mycorrhizal fungal function

3.1 The ecological function of AM fungi

The ecological functions of AM fungi are reflected in the stability of plant communities and plant ecosystems and the improvement of ecosystem productivity [173]. The ecological functions of AM fungi are mainly applied to the restoration of degraded soil and the reconstruction of degraded vegetation [174]. Studies have shown that the inoculation of AM fungi significantly improved the ability of host plants to repair heavy metal-contaminated soil. AM fungi infect host plants to establish a symbiotic system, enhance plant tolerance to heavy metals, and promote plant growth and metabolism by chelating soil heavy metal ions with extracellular hyphae and expanding root absorption area [175]. It affects the morphology of heavy metals in soil and regulates the transport of heavy metals in plants by affecting the secretion effect of roots and changing the absorption kinetics of roots [176]. Wang Haijuan et al. used alfalfa to inoculate AM fungi. After inoculation, it was found that it could significantly improve the root growth of alfalfa and improve the rhizosphere soil microorganisms [177]; Zhang Zhongfeng et al. reported that inoculation of AM fungi in karst areas could promote the growth and biomass growth of Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedlings. The above studies have found that the inoculation of AM fungi has a certain potential effect on the stability of vegetation in the ecosystem and the recovery ability of the natural ecosystem [178].

3.2 The role of mycorrhizal fungi in terrestrial ecosystems

3.2.1 Symbiosis with plants

Mycorrhizal fungi can form symbionts with plants. Mycorrhizal fungi in addition to part of the fungal hyphae in the root surface of the formation of hyphal sheath or into the root cortex cells to form vesicles from the branches, there are a large number of hyphae stretching in the rhizosphere soil of plants, these stretching to the rhizosphere soil of the mycelium to expand the absorption area of plant roots, enhance the absorption capacity of mineral elements and water in plants, through isotope tracing and water determination, has proved that mycorrhizal fungi can promote the absorption and utilization of P, N, K, Cu, Zn, and other elements and water in plants [179, 180, 181]; on the other hand, fungi also obtain carbohydrates and other nutrients through the roots of plants, thus forming a mutually beneficial relationship in nutrition.

3.2.2 Entering the food web as food

Many fungi that form ectomycorrhizal fungi can form fruiting bodies with different shapes and large volumes on the surface or trunk in the wet rainy season, and some can form truffles in the ground. Many of these fruiting bodies or truffles are the food of arthropods, some small mammals and some birds in the soil ecosystem, and many of them are delicious foods for humans, such as fungi of the genera Cantharellus, Boletus, Lactarius, Tricholoma, Russula, and Ramaria. On the one hand, these fungi play a role in maintaining species diversity in the ecosystem as a food source for animals; on the other hand, the biomass of mycorrhizal fungi directly enters the food web through animals, thereby accelerating the circulation of substances in the ecosystem.

3.2.3 Affecting the succession of plant communities and the floristic composition of communities in terrestrial ecosystems

In the fifties and sixties of the last century, ecologists have noticed that in the process of natural restoration of man-made or natural damaged ecosystems, the plants that first settled in the damaged habitats are often not the dominant species before the destruction; the more serious the damage to the ecosystem, the slower the natural recovery. In 1965 Mayr argued: “Why can‘t settle successfully in unspoiled habitats where there is usually strong competition for settlers in damaged habitats?” Why is it particularly easy to settle in disturbed habitats? May’s own answer is that “ the adaptive advantages of these species under certain conditions are usually at the expense of losing the adaptability of some other adaptive components and types,” which is obviously a self-contradictory argument. After that, ecologists studied the flora composition and succession of newly formed volcanic islands, such as Long Island and Iceland near Guyana. It was found that most of the plants that first settled on the volcanic island were Polygonaceae, Amaranthaceae, Cruciferae, Urticaceae, and Caryophyllaceae. At any time, plants of other families gradually moved to settle [182]. These first settled families are recognized as families that do not form mycorrhiza under natural conditions [19, 183]. In 1979, Reeves et al. published their comparative study of mid-elevation sage communities in natural and damaged ecosystems and found that 99% of plants in natural communities had mycorrhiza [184], while in the damaged ecosystem adjacent to the natural community (road embankment), the number of plants with mycorrhiza was less than 1%. According to the results of this study, and with reference to the settlement and succession of plants on the volcanic island, Reeves et al. made a reasonable explanation for the problem raised by Mayr. They believed that in the damaged ecosystem, the disturbance to the soil may reduce or eliminate the propagules of mycorrhizal fungi (generally referring to surviving hyphae and spores); the reduction of mycorrhiza fungal propagules reduced the possibility of infection of new host plants, and non-mycorrhizal species successfully colonized and established communities (because plant species that require mycorrhizal nutrition died at the seedling stage due to colonization of mycorrhiza fungal propagules on their roots even after immigration). The non-mycorrhizal species further grew successfully, and further reduced the propagules of mycorrhizal fungi (the survival time of mycorrhizal fungi in the absence of host plants was limited). All mycorrhizal fungal propagules were eliminated, and competition with mycorrhizal plant species was also avoided. It is very slow to return to the system state before being disturbed (only by the slow invasion of mycorrhizal fungi). The more serious the interference, the greater the possibility of eliminating mycorrhizal fungal propagules, so the recovery of the system will take longer. This explanation of Reeves et al. was further confirmed by later studies. Janos ‘s study showed that in the humid tropics, the restoration of disturbed ecosystems was first settled by facultative mycorrhizal plants in the damaged environment, and then gradually replaced by mycorrhizal plants and developed into a climax ecosystem. These results indicate that mycorrhizal fungi play an important role in the succession type, succession speed, and flora composition of plant communities in terrestrial ecosystems.

3.2.4 Regulation of resource allocation in ecosystems

In natural terrestrial ecosystems, the vast majority of plants form mycorrhizas, and the fungi that form mycorrhizas with plants are usually less specific to their hosts [185]. This is especially true for mycorrhizal fungi from branches [186]. Therefore, in the undisturbed forest ecosystem, the hyphae that grow outward from the roots of infected plants can further infect the roots of other plants, so that some unrelated plants in the system can be linked together through the hyphae of different mycorrhizal fungi, and the material and information can be exchanged through the hyphal network or hyphal bridge or hyphal connection between plant roots. Ecologists have noticed this way of binding in ecosystems and referred to these plants bound together by hyphae as “Guilds.” It has been proved that plants in dependent plant groups can use hyphae as channels to transmit C, N, P, and other substances between plants in two directions [185], thus affecting the allocation of resources in the ecosystem. Grime et al. further studied the role of this hyphal network in maintaining species diversity in ecosystems, and through research under experimental conditions, it is believed that this hyphal network shared by different plant species can increase species diversity in ecosystems by bidirectionally transferring carbohydrates [187]. However, Bergelson et al. considered that the study under this experimental condition did not prove that there was a relationship between “source” and “sink” of carbohydrates between the two plants, nor did it indicate that there was a “net flow” of carbohydrates between plants [188]. Therefore, this study could not be of universal significance.

3.2.5 Promote the absorption and utilization of water and nutrients by host plants

ECM mainly promotes the absorption of nutrients and water by expanding the absorption area and absorption range of tree roots. A large number of studies have shown that under forest site conditions, plant mycorrhizal fungi have different types of hyphal morphology in the soil. These hyphae can form a large hyphal system. The hyphal systems from different hosts and different types of ECM fungi are interconnected, and an intricate common hyphal network (common mycorrhizal networks: CMNs) is constructed underground [155, 189, 190]. Once the roots of trees form mycorrhizas with ectomycorrhizal fungi, the whole plant is connected to these CMNs. The absorption area and absorption length of the huge CMNs are much larger than the roots, which can not only promote the absorption and utilization of water and nutrients by host plants but also exchange water and nutrients between different host individuals and even different hosts through CMNs [191, 192, 193, 194].

3.2.6 Improving the stress resistance of host plants

3.2.6.1 Enhance the drought resistance of the host

Compared with host trees, ECM fungi have stronger plasticity and ecological adaptability, and most of them have the characteristics of drought and high-temperature resistance. Therefore, under drought conditions, host plants can obtain water from the soil through the mycelium network of ECM fungi to maintain normal growth. At the same time, under drought conditions, ECM can increase the leaf water potential and water retention capacity of host trees and reduce the leaf water saturation deficit value [195, 196]. ECM can also enhance drought resistance by regulating some physiological functions of host plants. For example, ECM fungi enhance host drought resistance by affecting the content or activity of host plant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, peroxidase, and polyphenol oxidase [197, 198, 199].

3.2.6.2 Enhance the host‘s resistance to saline-alkali

Ishida et al. investigated the ectomycorrhizal resources of S.mongolica in saline-alkali land of Northeast China and found that 11 ECM fungi could form ectomycorrhizal with S. mongolica, and the dominant species (Geopora sp.) was obvious [200]. A large number of studies have shown that under salt stress conditions, ECM can promote the absorption of water and various nutrients in the soil by tree roots on the one hand, and on the other hand, it can regulate the ion balance in plants and enhance the activity of the host root system, thereby alleviating the damage of saline-alkali stress to the host [201, 202]. In addition, it has been reported that ECM can also improve the respiration and water use efficiency of its host plants to enhance the host’s saline-alkali resistance [199].

3.2.6.3 Enhanced host resistance to heavy metals

In recent years, with the excessive development and utilization of mineral resources, heavy metal pollution is becoming more and more serious. These pollutions will cause great toxicity to plants and even cause plant death. Studies have found that mycorrhizal fungi can effectively reduce the toxicity of heavy metals. Huang et al. [203, 204] found that Pinus massoniana grown in manganese mining areas can form mycorrhizal fungi with a variety of ECM fungi. Using inoculation experiments, it was found that compared with aseptic seedlings, mycorrhizal seedlings can significantly improve the adaptability of the host, resist heavy metal toxicity, and ensure the biomass growth of the host [203204]. Huang et al. [203, 204] studied the effects of growth and heavy metal accumulation and distribution of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings by planting mycorrhizal seedlings in copper and cadmium-contaminated soil. The results showed that inoculation of mycorrhizal fungi could promote the growth and biomass accumulation of host trees on the one hand, and significantly reduce the accumulation of heavy metals in Pinus tabulaeformis on the other hand, and effectively block the transport of heavy metals from roots to stems and leaves of plants [205, 206]. The current research results show that mycorrhizal fungi can secrete a series of organic acids (such as oxalic acid) or secrete mucus that can chelate heavy metals. These secretions play an important role in the process of plant resistance to heavy metal stress. For example, Ahonen-Jonnarth et al. found that under aluminum stress, ectomycorrhizal seedlings can secrete more oxalic acid than uninoculated seedlings, and oxalic acid can chelate aluminum well [207].

3.2.6.4 Enhance the host‘s disease resistance

Liu Runjin and Chen Yinglong found that; the sheath and Hatnet in the ECM structure can effectively prevent the mechanical damage of soil pathogens to plant roots [5]. Pine damping-off disease is a common disease on Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings, which causes serious damage to P. tabulaeformis seedlings. Studies have found that inoculation of ectomycorrhizal fungi can significantly prevent P. tabulaeformis damping-off disease [208, 209]. In addition, ectomycorrhizal fungi also secrete some secondary metabolites, such as antibiotics, which can effectively inhibit the invasion of harmful bacteria and fungi in soil to host plants [210].

3.2.6.5 Promote seedling growth and improve the survival rate of afforestation

Afforestation is generally carried out in habitat destruction or difficult site areas. The main reason for the failure of afforestation is the low survival rate of seedlings. A large number of studies have shown that mycorrhizal seedlings can increase the chlorophyll content of the host, increase the photosynthetic rate of the seedlings, and reduce transpiration water loss [211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216]. On the other hand, many ECM fungi can produce plant endogenous hormones. For example, Amanita, Boletus and Rhizopogon can produce indole acetic acid (IAA) and cytokinin, and R. luteolus can produce zeatin [217, 218, 219]. These hormones can regulate the balance of hormones in plants and promote the growth of host plants, thereby improving the survival rate and preservation rate of afforestation [220].

References

  1. 1. Wei SP, Song YJ, Jia LM. Influence of the slope aspect on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community of Quercus variabilis Blume in the middle part of the Taihang Mountains, North China. Journal of Forestry Research. 2021;32(01):385-400
  2. 2. Shen HY, Yang BS, Wang H, et al. Changes in soil ectomycorrhizal fungi Community in oak Forests along the Llrban-rural gradient. Forests. 2022;13(5):675
  3. 3. Wang JN, Han SJ, Wang CG, et al. Long-tem nitrogen-addition-induced shifts in the ectomycorrhizal fungal community are associated with changes in fine root traits and soil properties in a mixed Pinuskoraiensis forest. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2022;112(10):103431
  4. 4. Frank B. On the nutritional dependence of certain trees on root symbiosis with belowground fungi (an English translation of a.B. Frank's classic paper of 1885). Mycorrhiza. 2005;15:267-275
  5. 5. Liu RJ, Chen YL. Mycorrhizology. Beijing: Science Press; 2007
  6. 6. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizalsymbiosis. London, UK: Academic Press; 2008
  7. 7. Rillig MC. Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 2004;84:355-363
  8. 8. Cheng L, Booker FL, Tu C, Burkey KO, Zhou LS, Shew HD, et al. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi increase organic carbon decomposition under elevated C02. Science. 2012;337:1084-1087
  9. 9. Clemmensen KE, Bahr A, Ovaskainen O, Dahlberg A, Ekblad A, Wallander H, et al. Roots and associated fungi drive Long-term carbon Sequestrationin boreal Forest. Science. 2013;339:1615-1618
  10. 10. Treseder KK, Holden SR. Fungal Carbon Sequestration. Science. 2013;339:1528-1529
  11. 11. Averill C, Turner BL, Finzi AC. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature. 2014;505:543-545
  12. 12. Wang B, Qiu YL. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza. 2006;16:299-363
  13. 13. Parniske M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: The mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2008;6:763-775
  14. 14. Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, et al. Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. [M]: AClAR Monograph. 1996;32:30-41
  15. 15. Liu RJ, JiaoH LY, Li M, Zhu XC. Research advances in species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 2009;20(9):2301-2307
  16. 16. Lin K, Limpens E, Zhang Z, Ivanov S, Saunders DG, et al. Single nucleus genome sequencing reveals high similarity among nuclei of an endomycorrhizal fungus. PLoS Genetics. 2014;10:e1004078
  17. 17. Berkeley MJ, Broome CE. Enumeration of the fungi of Ceylon. Journal of the Linnean Society: Botany. 1873;14:29-140
  18. 18. Bucholtz F. Beitrage zur kenntnis der Gattung Endogone Link. Beih Zum Botan Centr Abt. 1922;2:147-225
  19. 19. Gerdemann JW, Trappe JM. Endogonaceae in the Pacific northwest. Mycologia Memoir. 1974;5:1-76
  20. 20. Benjimin RK. Zygomycete and their spores. In: Kendrick B, editor. The Whole Fungus. Vol. I. Ottawa, Canada: National Museums of Canada; 1979. pp. 573-622
  21. 21. Morton JB, Benny GL. Revised classification of arbus-cular mycorrhizal fungi (Zygomycetes): A new order, Glomales, two new suborders, Glominae and Gigaspori-nae, and two families, Acaulosporaceae and Gigaspo-raceae, with an emendation of Glomaceae. Mycotaxon. 1990;37:471-491
  22. 22. Almeida RT, Schenck NC. A revision of the genus Sclerocystis (Glomaceae, Glomales). Mycologia. 1990;82:703-714
  23. 23. Redecker D, Morton JB, Bruns TD. Molecular phylogeny of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Glomus sinuosum and Sclerocystis coremioides. Mycologia. 2000;92:282-285
  24. 24. Schüβler A. Molecular phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution of Geosiphon pyriformis and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil. 2002;244(1):75-83
  25. 25. Oehl F, Silva GAD, Goto BT, Sieverding E. Glomeromycota: Three new genera and glomoid species reorganized. Mycotaxon. 2011;116(1):75-120
  26. 26. Opik M, Zobel M, Cantero JJ, Davison J, Facelli JM, Hiiesalu I, et al. Global sampling of plant roots expands the described molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza. 2013;23:411-430
  27. 27. Wang YS, Liu RJ. A checklist of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the recent taxonomic system of Glomeromycota. Mycosystema. 2017;36(07):820-850
  28. 28. Liu YP, Sohn B, Wang SZ, Jiang GY, Liu RJ. Advances in the study of genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Biodiversity Science. 2008;16(3):225-228
  29. 29. Hijri M, Sanders IR. Low gene copy number shows that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inherit genetically different nuclei. Nature. 2005;433:160-163
  30. 30. Corradi N, Croll D, Colard A, Kuhn q Ehinger M, Sanders IR. Gene copy number polymorphisms in an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal population. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73:366-369
  31. 31. Sanders IR, Alt M, Groppe K, et al. Identification of ribosomal DNA polymorphism among and within spores of the Glomales: Application to studies on the genetic diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. The New Phytologist. 1995;130:419-427
  32. 32. Lloyd-Macgilp SA, Chambers SM, Dodd JC. Diversity of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers within and among isolates of glomus mosseae and related mycorrhizal fungi. The New Phytologist. 1996;133:103-111
  33. 33. Antoniolli ZI, Schachtman DP, Ophel-Keller K, Smith SE. Variation in rDNA ITS sequences in glomus mosseae and Gigaspora margarita spores from a permanent pasture. Mycological Research. 2000;104:708-715
  34. 34. Pawlowska TE, Taylor JW. Organization of genetic variation in individuals of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature. 2004;427:733-737
  35. 35. Kuhn G, Hijri M, Sanders IR. Evidence for the evolution of multiple genomes in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature. 2001;414:745-748
  36. 36. Bever JD, Morton JB. Heritable variation and mechanisms of inheritance of spore shape within a population of ScutellospoYa pellucida, an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Journal of Ecology. 1999;86:1209-1216
  37. 37. Koch AM, Kuhn G, Fontanillas P, Fumagalli L, Goudet G, Sanders IR. High genetic variability and low local diversity in a population of arbuscular mycon-hizal fungi. PNAS. 2004;101:2369-2374
  38. 38. Koch AM, Croll D, Sanders IR. Genetic variability in a population of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi causes variation in plant growth. Ecological Letters. 2006;9:103-110
  39. 39. Tawaraya K, Saito M. Effect of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection on amino acid composition in roots of onion and white clover. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 1994;40(2):339-343
  40. 40. Zhang HB, Liang YM, Feng SZ, Zhao ZW, Su YR, He XY. The effects of soil types and plant species on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community and colonization in the rhizosphere. Research of Agricultural Modernization. 2016;37(01):187-194
  41. 41. Yang XL. Mycorrhizal Diversity in the Larix gmelinii Forest Ecosystems of Da Hinggan Ling Mountains. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2010
  42. 42. Remy W, Taylor TN, Hass H, Kerp H. Four hundred-million-year-old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1994;91:11841-11843
  43. 43. Redecker D, Kodner R, Graham LE. Glomalean fungi from the Ordovician. Science. 2000;289:1920-1921
  44. 44. Humphreys CP, Franks PJ, Rees M, Bidartondo MI, Leake JR, Beerling DJ. Mutualistic mycorrhiza-like symbiosis in the most ancient group of land plants. Nature Communications. 2010;1:103
  45. 45. Sanders IR. Ecology and evolution of multigenomic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. American Naturalist. 2002;160:S128-S141
  46. 46. Burggraaf AJP, Beringer JE. Absence of nuclear-DNA synthesis in vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi during Invitro development. New Phytologist. 1989;111:25-33
  47. 47. Clapp JP, Rodriguez A, Dodd JC. Inter- and intra-isolate rRNA large subunit variation in Glomus coronatum spores. New Phytologist. 2001;149:539-554
  48. 48. Munkvold L, Kjoller R, Vestberg M, Rosendahl S, Jakobsen I. High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist. 2004;164:357-364
  49. 49. van der Heijden MGA, Scheublin TR, Brader A. Taxonomic and functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is there any relationship? New Phytologist. 2004;164:201-204
  50. 50. Mensah JA, Koch AM, Antunes PM, Kiers ET, Hart M, Bucking H. High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is associated with differences in phosphate and nitrogen uptake and fungal phosphate metabolism. Mycorrhiza. 2015;25:533-546
  51. 51. Halary S, Malik SB, Lildhar L, Slamovits CH, Hijri M, Corradi N. Conserved meiotic machinery in glomus spp., a putatively ancient asexual fungal lineage. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2011;3:950-958
  52. 52. Tisserant E, Kohler A, Dozolme-Seddas P, Balestrini R, Benabdellah K, Colard A, et al. The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont. New Phytologist. 2012;193:755-769
  53. 53. Corradi N, Bonfante P. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Origin and evolution of a beneficial plant infection. PLoS Pathogens. 2012;8:e1002600
  54. 54. Tisserant E, Malbreil M, Kuo A, Kohler A, Symeonidi A, Balestrini R, et al. Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:20117-20122
  55. 55. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Sheffield, UK: Academic Press; 2010
  56. 56. Zhang MQ , Wang YS. The relationship between the distribution of am fungi and environmental factors. Mycosystema. 1999;18(1):25-29
  57. 57. Hu JL. The Diversity and Function of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Alfalfa under Different Nutrient Conditions. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University; 2019
  58. 58. Alguacil MM, Tomes MP, Torrecillas E, et al. Plant type differently promotes the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biodiversity in their rhizospheres after revegetation of a degraded, semiarid land. In: 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, Brisbane. 2010
  59. 59. Hiiesalu I, Partel M, Davison J, et al. Species richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Associations with grassland plant richness and biomass. New Phytologist. 2014;203(1):233-244
  60. 60. Hausmann NT, Hawkes CV. Plant neighborhood control of arbuscular orrhizal community composition. New Phytologist. 2009;183(4):1188-1200
  61. 61. Lin X, Feng Y, Zhang H, et al. Long-term balanced fertilization decreases arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in an arable soil in North China revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. Environmental Science and Technology. 2012;46(11):5764-5771
  62. 62. Chen YL, Zhang X, Ye JS, et al. Six-year fertilization modifies the biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2014;69(1):371-381
  63. 63. Liang K, Fan YQ , Kudakwaslie M, et al. The seasonal dynamics of nitrogen and rhizosphere effects in the typical saline-alkali vegetation communities of the Yellow River estuary wetland. Environmental Chemistry. 2019;38(10):2327-2335
  64. 64. Camenzind T, Hempel S, Homeier J, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus additions impact arbuscular mycorrhizal abundance and molecular diversity in a tropical montane forest. Global Change Biology. 2014;20(12):3646-3659
  65. 65. Verbruggen E, Xiang D, Chen B, et al. Mycorrhizal fungi associated with high soil N:P ratios are more likely to be lost upon conversion from grasslands to arable agriculture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2015;86:1-4
  66. 66. Christinev H, Lainp H, Phil I, et al. Soil temperature affects carbon allocation within arbuscular mycorrhizal networks and carbon transport from plant to fungus. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(5):1181-1190
  67. 67. Cai XB, Peng YL, Gai JP. Ecological distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alpine grasslands of Tibet plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 2010;21(10):2635-2644
  68. 68. Yin B. The Fungi Survey of Picea Mongolica and Research on Ectomycorrhiza Form Type. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2012
  69. 69. Huang LL, Wan SP, Wang YL, Yu YM, Shi XF, Yu FQ. Mycorrhiza synthesis of Pinus thunbergii with eight ectomycorrhizal fungi species. Acta Edulis Fungi. 2022;29(04):98-106
  70. 70. Futai K, Taniguchi T, Kataoka R. Ectomycorrhizae and their importance in Forest cosystems. In: Mycorrhizae: Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry. Netherlands: Springer; 2008. pp. 241-285
  71. 71. Yuam Q. Community Stricture of Ectomycorrhzal Fungi Associate with Fagaceae in a Tropical Montane Rainforest. Haikou: Hainan University; 2016
  72. 72. Wu XT, Zhang B, Qiao LM. Investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with pine species in Fushun area. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology. 2018;06:61-63
  73. 73. Li M, Gao XH. Community structure and driving factors for rhizosphere ectomycorrhizal fungi of Betula platyphylla in Daqing Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 2021;40(05):1244-1252
  74. 74. Jiang Y, Mo XY, Deng HY, Liu LT. Composition and diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal community associated with Eucalyptus grandis plantation. Journal of Northwest Forestry University. 2020;35(06):153-159
  75. 75. Zou J. Effects of Different Tuber Infected Carya Illinoensis on Plant Growth and Root Microecology. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University; 2019
  76. 76. Ma SR, Shi MY, Li Y, He Q , Cui HJ. Research Progress on ectomycorrhizal fungi of Salicaceae. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology. 2020;10:100-102
  77. 77. Martin F, Kohler A, Murat C, Veneault-Fourrey C, Hibbett DS. Unearthing the roots of ectomycorrhizal symbioses. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2016;14(12):760-773
  78. 78. Lu LJ, Bai SL, Wang J, Wang TN. Synthesis conditions of Ectomycorrhiza and its formation mechanism. Journal of Microbiology. 2005;02:84-87
  79. 79. Gay G, Normand L, Marmeisse R, Sotta B, Debaud JC. Auxin overproducer mutants of Hebeloma cylindrosporum Romagnesi have increased mycorrhizal activity. New Phytologist. 1994;128(4):645-657
  80. 80. Feng B, Yang ZL. Ectomycorrhizal symbioses: Diversity of mycobionts and molecular mechanisms that entail the development of ectomycorrhizae. Scientia Sinica(Vitae). 2019;49(04):436-444
  81. 81. Lagrange H, Jay-Allgmand C, Lapeyrie F. Rutin, the phenolglycoside from eucalyptus root exudates, stimulates Pisolithus hyphal growth at picomolar concentrations. New Phytologist. 2001;149:349-355
  82. 82. Daguerre Y, Plett JM, Veneault-Fourrey C. Signaling pathways driving the development of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. In: Martin F, editor. Molecular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017. pp. 141-157
  83. 83. Vayssières A, Pěnčík A, Felten J, Kohler A, Ljung K, Martin F, et al. Development of the poplar-Laccaria bicolor Ectomycorrhiza modifies root auxin metabolism, signaling, and response. Plant Physiology. 2015;169(1):890-902
  84. 84. Krause K, Henke C, Asiimwe T, Ulbricht A, Klemmer S, Schachtschabel D, et al. Biosynthesis and secretion of Indole-3-acetic acid and its morphological effects on Tricholoma vaccinum-spruce Ectomycorrhiza. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015;81(20):7003-7011
  85. 85. Ditengou FA, Müller A, Rosenkranz M, Felten J, Lasok H, van Doorn MM, et al. Volatile signalling by sesquiterpenes from ectomycorrhizal fungi reprogrammes root architecture. Nature Communications. 2015;6:6279
  86. 86. Tedersoo L, Smith ME. Ectomycorrhizal fungal lineages: Detection of four new groups and notes on consistent recognition of ectomycorrhizal taxa in high-throughput sequencing studies. In: Tedersoo L, editor. Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Ecological Studies. Vol. 230. Springer; 2017. pp. 125-142
  87. 87. Tedersoo L, May TW, Smith ME. Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: Global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza. 2010;20(4):217-263
  88. 88. Tedersoo L, Smith ME. Lineages of ectomycorrhizal fungi revisited: Foraging strategies and novel lineages revealed by sequences from belowground. Fungal Biology Reviews. 2013;27(3-4):83-99
  89. 89. Tedersoo L, Brundrett MC. Evolution of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in plants. Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 2017;230:407-467
  90. 90. Feng B, Yang ZL. Ectomycorrhizal symbioses: Diversity of mycobionts and molecular mechanisms that entail the development of ectomycorrhizae. Scientia Sinica (Vitae). 2019;49(04):150-158
  91. 91. Meng FR, Shao JW. The ecological distribution of ecto-mycorrhizal fungi in main coniferous forests in Northeast China. Mycosystema. 2001;20(3):413-419
  92. 92. Wang Y, Xie ZX. A preliminary survey of of some forest ectomycorrhiza fungi trees in China. Mycosystema. 1983;2(1):59-61
  93. 93. Zhao JM, Liu HY, Ni XZ. Study on the classification of Russulaceae in Changbai Mountain. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University. 1998;20(1):232-236
  94. 94. Wang SQ , Xu LH. Investigation on ectomycorrhizal fungi resources of main timber species in Northeast China. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology. 2002;3:17-20
  95. 95. Tu LGE, Chen JZ, Wang Y, Fan YG. Macrofungal diversity in broad-leaved Korean pine forest in the Changbaishan National Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2010;30(17):4549-4558
  96. 96. Wang Q. Ectomycorrhizal community composition of Quercus mongolica. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology. 2013;3:6-9
  97. 97. Song FQ , Liu YK, Du CM, Yang FS. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal macro-fungi at Xiao Hinggan Mountain and medium optimization for Suillus grevillei using response surface methodology. Journal of Natural Resources. 2011;26(3):440-449
  98. 98. Lang QL, Zhang XQ , Wang FT, Gang SB, Wang H. A preliminary report on the investigation of tussah mycorrhizal fungi resources and the observation of fruiting body occurrence period in Fengcheng area of Liaoning Province. North Sericulture. 2003;24(96):31-35
  99. 99. Wang H, Dai LM, Shao GF, Lang QL, Yang BS, Deng HB, et al. Ecological distribution of mycorrihizal fungi associated with oak in Dandong district of Liaoning Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 2003;14(12):2149-2152
  100. 100. Cui L, Mu LQ. The morphological and anatomical characteristics of ectomycorrhizae colonizing Tilia amurensis Rupr. in Heilongjiang Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 2014;33(9):2490-2500
  101. 101. Tang M, Chen H, Guo JL, Hou DW. A study of the ectomycorrhiza of poplar. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1994;30(5):437-441
  102. 102. Tian ML. Investigation and distribution of Russulaceae resources in Gansu Province. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University. 1998;20(S1):219-223
  103. 103. Wu JK, He LL, Li JL. A primary study on macrofungi Resouces from Shaanxi. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition). 1996;26(5):435-438
  104. 104. Wu CH, Wang JR, Yang JX, Wu GH. A study on ectomycorrhiza and mycorrhiza fungi in Taibai Mountain nature reserve. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition). 2001;29(2):56-60
  105. 105. Pu X. The ectomycorrhizal macromycetes resources inLonglan area of Gansu. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology. 2000;25(2):1-5
  106. 106. Xun LH. Studies on Diversity and Nutrition Constituent of Macrofungi in Helan Mountain in Ningxia. Inner Mongolia: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2012
  107. 107. Zhang RQ , Tang M, Zhang HH, Du XG. A preliminary investigation on ectomycorrhizal fungi in Huoditang Forest region of Qinling Mountains. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University(Natural Science). 2011;28(3):168-173
  108. 108. Qi P, Li JZ, Li AL, Dai L, Ding SG. Preliminary survey report of macro-fungi germplasm resources in the middle area of Qinling Mountains. Edible Fungi of China. 2013;32(1):8-13
  109. 109. Ding XW, Liu KH, Deng BW, Chen WQ. Preliminary survey of macro fungi resources in Zibai Mountain of Qinling area. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences. 2012;40(10):111-113
  110. 110. Guli A, Feng L, Qing XZ, Chen J, Marhaba, Yang XP, et al. Investigation on wild fungi resources in Habahe plain of Altai prefecture (I). Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences. 2015;52(9):1707-1714
  111. 111. Chen ZH, Zhang ZG, Zhang P, Zhang TX, Zhang ZH, Xiao QY. The resources, taxonomy and ecological features of amanita in mount. Mang, Hunan. Edible Fungi of China. 1997;16(6):27-29
  112. 112. Li JZ. Two new records of am Anita in China. Acta Mycologica Sinica. 1996;15(2):154-156
  113. 113. Cui B, Ma J, Li LC. Study on the macrofungus resources of russulaceae family in Henan (II). Henan Science. 1998;16(3):323-329
  114. 114. Zhang LP, Tao AJ, Zhang Y, Luang FG, Wang S, Ling CY. The ecological distribution and resource assessment of macrofungi in Tongboshan natural Reserve of Jiangxi Province. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis. 2013;35(6):1229-1235
  115. 115. Li JZ, Chen SM, Dan XQ. Macrofungus resources of the Shunhuang Mountain natural protection region. Life Science Research. 2006;10(3):276-281
  116. 116. Li JZ, Yu XL, Zhou JL, Tang M, Wang X, Chen Q , et al. The macrofungus resources investigation and the ecologic distribution and economy meaning of the Nan-Yue Mountain natural protection region. Life Science Research. 2007;03:218-226
  117. 117. Huang J, Nara K, Lian CL, Zong K, Peng KJ, Xue SG, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associated with Masson pine (Pinus massoniana lamb.) in Pb-Zn mine sites of central South China. Mycorrhiza. 2012;22(8):589-602
  118. 118. Qin L, Xv J, Ma X. Research on Symbiotical fungi species and Ectomycorrhizae occurrence of chestnut (Castanea mollissima BL.). Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture. 1995;10(1):71-76
  119. 119. Cai HS, Liu HX, Guo YM, Cui GF. Brief report on investigation of macro-fungi in Beijing Song mountain nature reserve. Ecological Science. 2003;22(3):250-251
  120. 120. Tian HM, Liu TZ, Duan YP. Resources and economic value of the fungal family Russulaceae in Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Fungal Research. 2014;12(2):83-87
  121. 121. Fan YJ, Yan W. Morphological type and molecular identification of Ectomycorrhizae on Betula platyphyllain Inner Mongolia area. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica. 2013;33(11):2209-2215
  122. 122. Bai SL, Yan W, Ma RH, Wang TN. Investigation of ECM fungi resources in Mt. Daqing and Mt. Manhan. Mountain Research. 2001;19(1):44-47
  123. 123. Fan YJ, Yan W, Wang LY. Morphological type and molecular identification of Ectomycorrhizae on Picea crassifolia in Helan Mountain. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2011;47(6):108-113
  124. 124. Bai SL, Liu Y, Zhou J, Dong Z, Fan R. Resources investigation and ecological study on ectomycorrhizal fungi in Daqingshan Mountains, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2006;26(3):837-841
  125. 125. Gong MQ , Chen Y. A study on Pinus and eucalyptus Ectomycorrhiza in South China. Forest Research. 1991;4(3):323-327
  126. 126. Rao BQ. Study on mycorrhizal community of Pinus massoniana lamb. In: Wuyishan Nature Reserve. Xiamen: Xiamen University; 2000
  127. 127. Qian XM, Huang YJ, Zhang YH, Wu JL, Chen RH, Liu GF, et al. Biodiversity of the ectomycorrhiza on the rare and endangered tree species Tuga chinensis tchekiangensis(Flous) Cheng in Wuyishan nature reserve. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University: Natural Science Edition. 2007;36(2):180-185
  128. 128. Li HB, Wu XQ , Wei HL, Fu LZ, Wu QQ , Chen YL, et al. Brief report on investigation of ectomycorrhizal fungi resources in Lishui area, Zhejiang Province. Edible Fungi of China. 2005;24(5):10-14
  129. 129. Ke LX, Liu BR. Resource and ecological distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi under pine forests of Huangshan Mountain district. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. 2005;16(3):455-458
  130. 130. Chen TX, Chen SL. Species composition and ecological characteristics of macrofungi in Zijin Mountain, Nanjing. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment. 2012;28(4):373-379
  131. 131. Bi GC, Zang M, Guo XZ. Distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi under several chief forest types in alpine coniferou region of northwestern Yunnan. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1989;25(1):33-39
  132. 132. He SC. A preliminary study on the resources of forest ectotrophic fungi and their ecological distribution from Guizhou province, China. Guizhou Science. 1991;01:51-58
  133. 133. Tan FH, Wang YZ. Investigation on species of ectomycorrhizal fungi of pine and eucalyptus in Sichuan. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology. 2000;21(3):65-69
  134. 134. Yu FQ , Xiao YQ , Liu PG. Spatiotemporal distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Pinus yunnanensis forests. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2007;27(6):2325-2333
  135. 135. Zhu TH, Zhang J, Hu TX, Li XW, Liu YG. The study on ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with eucalyptus in Sichuan. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University. 2001;19(2):137-140
  136. 136. Liu XJ, Xv AS, Deng LJ. The resources of Russulaceae in Sejila Mountain of Xizang. Edible Fungi of China. 2010;29(4):8-9
  137. 137. Zhou GL, Deng HP, Zhang JH. The macrofungi resources diversity of Jinyunshan natural reserve. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences. 2012;40(12):126-130
  138. 138. Luo GT, Wang JX, Yuan W. Investigation of the macrofungi of Ectotrophic mycorrhiza of Pinus massoniana in Kaili City, Guizhou Province. Edible Fungi of China. 2007;26(2):12-14
  139. 139. Rinaldi AC, Comandini O, Kuyper TW. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: Seperating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Diversity. 2008;33:1-45
  140. 140. Tedersoo L, Sadam A, Zambrano M, et al. Low diversity and high host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Western Amazonia, a neotropical biodiversity hotspot. The ISME Journal. 2010;4(4):465-471
  141. 141. Wurzburger N, Hartshorn AS, Hendrick RL. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure across a bog-forest ecotone in southeastern Alaska. Mycorrhiza. 2004;14(6):383-389
  142. 142. Smith ME, Henkel TW, Aime MC, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure on three co-occurring leguminous canopy tree species in a Neotropical rainforest. New Phytologist. 2011;192(3):699-712
  143. 143. Lamit LJ, Holeski LM, Flores-Rentería L, et al. Tree genotype influences ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure: Ecological and evolutionary implications. Fungal Ecology. 2016;24:124-134
  144. 144. Bonito G, Brenneman T, Vilgalys R. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity in orchards of cultivated pecan (Carya illinoinensis; Juglandaceae). Mycorrhiza. 2011;21(7):601-612
  145. 145. Ji RQ , Gao TT, Li GL, Xv Y, Xing PJ, Zhou JJ, et al. Correlation between ectomycorrhizal fungal community and environmental factors in Pinus koraiensis forest in Northeast China. Mycosystema. 2020;39(04):743-754
  146. 146. Zhao M, Hao LF, Zhang M, Teng H, Yan HX, Bai SL. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure characteristics of natural Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica with different age classes in Honghuaerji, greater Khingan Mountains. Mycosystema. 2019;38(9):1420-1429
  147. 147. Yang Y. Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Community in the Rhizospheric Soil of Eight Tree Species in Inner Mongolia. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2018
  148. 148. Long D. Diversity Maintenance Mechanism of Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Community Associated with Pinus tabuliformis in North China. Yangling: Northwest A&F University; 2017
  149. 149. Wang XB. Research on the Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Community Associated with Major Oaks at Qinling Mountains and Loess Plateau. Yangling: Northwest A&F University; 2017
  150. 150. Zhang TT, Geng ZC, Xv CY, Zhang XP, Du C, Wang ZK, et al. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Larixg melinii in Xinjiashan forest region of Qinling Mountains. Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 2018;58(3):443-454
  151. 151. Noack F. Ueber mykorhizenbildende Pilze. Bot Zeit. 1889;24:391-404
  152. 152. Melin E. Über die mykorrhizenpilze von Pinus silvestris L. und Picea abies (L.) karst. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 1921;15:192-203
  153. 153. Melin E. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Konstitution und Ökologie der Mykorrhizen von Pinus silvestris L. und Picea Abies (L.) Karst. Mykol Untersuch Ber. 1923;2:73-331
  154. 154. Molina R, Massicotte H, Trappe JM. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: Community-ecological consequences and practical implications. In: Allen MF, editor. Mycorrhizal Functioning, an Integrative Plant–Fungal Process. New York, NY: Springer; 1992. pp. 357-423
  155. 155. Taylor AF, Alexander IAN. The ectomycorrhizal symbiosis: Life in the real world. Mycologist. 2005;19(3):102-112
  156. 156. Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, et al. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the fungi. Mycological Research. 2007;111(5):509-547
  157. 157. Hibbett DS, Luz-Beatriz G, Donoghue MJ. Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature. 2000;407(6803):506
  158. 158. Chen LQ. Studies on symbiotic mycorrhiza fungi with masson pine. Forest Research. 1989;04:357-362
  159. 159. Zhao Z, Ma KX, Duan AA. Research on types and ecological characteristics of ectomycorrhiza of Populus tomentosa. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1993;01:12-18
  160. 160. Bai SL. Study on Distribution and Selection of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi in Daqingshan Mountain, Inner Mongolia. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University; 2006
  161. 161. Fan YJ. Morphologic Analysis and Molecular Identification of Ectomycorrhizae of Four Dominant Tree Species in Inner Mongolia Area. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2009
  162. 162. Zhang WQ. The Study on the Diversity of Ectomycorrhizal Fungi of Pinus sylvestris Var. Mongolica Litv and Mycorrhizal Biotechnology. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University; 2013
  163. 163. Wang Q , Gao C, Guo LD. Ectomycorrhizae associated with Castanopsis fargesii (Fagaceae) in a subtropical forest, China. Mycological Progress. 2011;10:323-332
  164. 164. Wang Q , He XH, Guo LD. Ectomycorrhizal fungus communities of Quercus liaotungensis Koidz of different ages in a northern China temperate forest. Mycorrhiza. 2012;22(6):461-470
  165. 165. Ding Q , Liang Y, Legendre P, He XH, Pei KQ , Du XJ, et al. Diversity and composition of ectomycorrhizal community on seedling roots: The role of host preference and soil origin. Mycorrhiza. 2011;21(8):669-680
  166. 166. Yin RH, Yan W, Wei J. Ectomycorrhizal diversity of Picea Crassifolia in Helan Mountain of Inner Mongolia. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design. 2017;40(2):71-72, 75
  167. 167. Geng R, Geng ZC, Huang J, He WX, Hou L, She D, et al. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Quercus aliena in Xinjiashan forest region of Qinling Mountains. Mycosystema. 2016;07:833-847
  168. 168. Geng R, Geng ZC, Huang J, He WX, Hou L, She D, et al. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Picea asperata in Xin Jiashan Forest of Qinling Mountains. Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 2015;07:905-915
  169. 169. Gao C, Zhang Y, Shi NN, Zheng Y, Chen L, Wubet T, et al. Community assembly of ectomycorrhizal fungi along a subtropical secondary forest succession. New Phytologist. 2015;205(2):771-785
  170. 170. Wen ZG. Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Communities on the Endangered Chinese Douglas-Fir (Pseudotsuga Sinensis) and Identification of Rhizopogo n-Pseudots Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University; 2014
  171. 171. Han Q , Huang J, Long D, Wang X, Liu J. Diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with Larix chinensis across the alpine treeline ecotone of Taibai Mountain. Mycorrhiza. 2017;2:1-11
  172. 172. Wang X, Liu J, Long D, Han Q , Huang J. The ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associated with quercus liaotungensis, in different habitats across northern China. Mycorrhiza. 2017;27(5):441-449
  173. 173. van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, et al. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature. 1998;396(6706):69-72
  174. 174. Wang D, Zhou H, Zuo J, Chen P, She Y, Yao B, et al. Responses of soil microbial metabolic activity and community structure to different degraded and restored grassland gradients of the Tibetan plateau. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:770315
  175. 175. Luo QY, Wang XJ, Lin SS, Li YY, Sun L, Jin L. Mechanism and application of bioremediation to heavy metal polluted soil using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2013;33(13):3898-3906
  176. 176. Zu YQ , Lu X, Zhan FD, Hu WY, Li Y. A review on roles and mechanisms of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of heavy metals–polluted soils. Plant Physiology Journal. 2015;51(10):1538-1548
  177. 177. Wang HJ, Bao YY, Niu TX, Li XF. Effect of combined application of microbial inoculum and fertilizer on fertility of open-pit mine dump reclaimed soil. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica. 2014;29(04):186-191
  178. 178. Zhang ZF, Zhang JC, Huang YQ , Xv GP, Zhang DN, Yu YC. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on the drought tolerance of Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2016;36(11):3402-3410
  179. 179. Hayman DS. Influence of soils and fertility on activity and survival of vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Phytopathology. 1982;72:1119-1125
  180. 180. Ames RN, Reid CP, Potter LK, et al. Hyphal uptake and transport of nitrogen from two 15N-labelled sources by glomus mosseae, a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytologist. 1993;95:381-396
  181. 181. Harrison MJ, Van Buuren ML. A phosphate transporter from the mycorrhizal fungus glomus versif Orme. Nature. 1995;378:626-629
  182. 182. Dimond JM. Colonization of a volcano inside a volcano. Nature. 1977;270:13-14
  183. 183. Trappe JM. Phylogenetic and ecological aspects of mycotrophy in the angiosperms from an evolutionary standpoint. In: Safer GR, editor. Ecophysiology of VA Mycorrhiz al Plants. Florida: CRC Press; 1987. pp. 5-26
  184. 184. Reeves FB, Wagner D, Moorman T, Kiel J. The role of endomycorrhizae in revegetation practices in semiarid west. I. A comparison of incidence of mycorrhizae in severely disturbed v/s natural environments. American Journal of Botany. 1979;66:6-13
  185. 185. Read D. The ties that bind. Nature. 1997;388:517-518
  186. 186. Mosse B. Advances in the study of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 1973;11:171-196
  187. 187. Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ. Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature. 1987;328:420-422
  188. 188. Bergelson JM, Crawley MJ. Mycorrhizal infection and plant species diversity. Nature. 1988;334:202
  189. 189. Booth MG. Mycorrhizal networks mediate overstorey-understorey competition in a temperate forest. Ecology Letters. 2004;7(7):538-546
  190. 190. Nara K. Ectomycorrhizal networks and seedling establishment during early primary succession. New Phytologist. 2006;169(1):169-178
  191. 191. He X, Bledsoe CS, Zasoski RJ, Southworth D, Horwath WR. Rapid nitrogen transfer from ectomycorrhizal pines to adjacent ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal plants in a California oak woodland. New Phytologist. 2006;170(1):143-151
  192. 192. He X, Xu M, Qiu GY, Zhou J. Use of 15N stable isotope to quantify nitrogen transfer between mycorrhizal plants. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2009;2(3):107-118
  193. 193. Bai SL, Li GL, Liu Y, Dumroese RK, Lv RH. Ostryopsis davidiana seedlings inoculated with ectomycorrhizal fungi facilitate formation of mycorrhizae on Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings. Mycorrhiza. 2009;19(6):425-434
  194. 194. Walder F, Boller T, Wiemken A, Courty PE. Regulation of plants' phosphate uptake in common mycorrhizal networks: Role of intraradical fungal phosphate transporters. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2016;11(2):e1131372
  195. 195. Wu BY, Liang NK. Effect of Ectomycorrhizae on the drought resistance of Pinus tabulae formis seedlings. Journal of Beijing Forestry University. 1991;S3:281-290
  196. 196. Lv Q , Lei ZP. A study on effect of Ectomycorrhizae on promoting Castanea mollissima resistance to drought and its mechanism. Forest Research. 2000;03:249-256
  197. 197. Chen H, Tang M, Liu XD, Li ZF. Effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on poplar resistance to canker disease. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica. 1996;04:83
  198. 198. Osonubi O, Okon IE, Bamiduro TA. Effect of different fungal inoculation periods on performance of Gmelina seedlings under dry soil conditions. Forest Ecology and Management. 1990;37(4):223-232
  199. 199. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcón R, Palma JM. Superoxide dismutase activity in arbuscular mycorrhizal Lactuca sativa plants subjected to drought stress. New Phytologist. 1996;134(2):327-333
  200. 200. Ishida TA, Nara K, Ma S, Takano T, Liu S. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community in alkaline-saline soil in northeastern China. Mycorrhiza. 2009;19(5):329-335
  201. 201. Huang Y, Jiang XY, Liang ZC, Li T. Effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on growth and physiology of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings under saline stress. Journal of Agro-Environment Science. 2006;25(6):1475-1480
  202. 202. Kernaghan G, Hambling B, Fung M, Khasa D. In vitro selection of boreal ectomycorrhizal fungi for use in reclamation of saline-alkaline habitats. Restoration Ecology. 2002;10(1):43-51
  203. 203. Huang J, Nara K, Zong K, Lian C. Soil propagule banks of ectomycorrhizal fungi along forest development stages after mining. Microbial Ecology. 2015;69(4):768-777
  204. 204. Huang J, Nara K, Zong K, Wang J, Xue S, Peng K, et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associated with Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and white oak (Quercus fabri) in a manganese mining region in Hunan Province, China. Fungal Ecology. 2014;9(1):1-10
  205. 205. Huang Y, Huang ZJ. Ectomycorrhizae and heavy metals resistance of higher plants. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 2005;04:422-427
  206. 206. Huang Y, Peng B, Li T, Liang ZC. Growth and element accumulation of pinus tabulaeformis seedlings influenced by inoculation of ectomycorrhizal fungi in cu and cd contaminated soil. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2007;05:923-929
  207. 207. Ahonen-Jonnarth ULLA, Van Hees PAW, Lundström US, Finlay RD. Production of organic acids by mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings exposed to elevated concentrations of aluminium and heavy metals. New Phytologist. 2000;146:557-567
  208. 208. Guo XZ, Tan F, He SL. Ectomycorrhizal fungi control damping-off disease of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings. Forestry Science & Technology. 1981;02:23-25
  209. 209. Zhang RQ , Tang M, Zhang HH. Effects of four ectomycorrhizal species on controlling damping off and promoting the growth of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings. Mycosystema. 2011;05:812-816
  210. 210. Lei ZP, Jing JR, Wang CW. Antagonism of ectomycorrhizal fungi to pathogens of plant roots. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 1989;06:502-508
  211. 211. Yan XF, Wang Q. Effects of co-inoculation with two ectomycorrhizal fungi on quercus liaotungensis seedlings. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2004;01:17-23
  212. 212. Yan XF, Wang Q. Effects of ectomycorrhizal inoculation on the seedling growth of Quercus liaotungensis. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology. 2002;06:701-707
  213. 213. Wang Y, Ding GJ. Effects of ectomycorrhizal on growth, physiological characteristics and nutrition in Pinus massoniana seedlings. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition. 2013;02:97-102
  214. 214. Wang Y, Ding GJ. Effects of exogenous mycorrhiza on growth of Pinus massoniana seedlings. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology. 2011;04:74-78
  215. 215. Liu XG, Guo SJ, Zhao H, Ma LY. Effect of different ectomycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis and transpiration characteristics of Quercus variabilis seedlings. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology. 2010;06:1-5
  216. 216. Gao Y, Wu XQ. Effects of several ectomycorrhizal fungi on the chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in different pine seedlings. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University: Natural Sciences Edition. 2010;06:9-12
  217. 217. Durand DJC, Casselton LA, Gay G. Isolation and preliminary characterization of 5-fluoroindole-resistant and IAA-overproducer mutants of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum Romagnesi. New Phytologist. 1992;121(4):545-553
  218. 218. Kraigher H, Grayling A, Wang TL, Hanke DE. Cytokinin production by two ectomycorrhizal fungi in liquid culture. Phytochemistry. 1991;30(7):2249-2254
  219. 219. Ulrich JM. Auxin production by mycorrhizal fungi. Physiologia Plantarum. 1960;13(3):429-443
  220. 220. Yu F, Liu P. Reviews and prospects of the ectomycorrhizal research and application. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2001;22(12):2217-2226

Written By

YingWu Shi, XinXiang Niu, Hongmei Yang, Ming Chu, Huifang Bao, Ning Wang, Faqiang Zhan, Xuanqi Long, Rong Yang, Qing Lin and Kai Lou

Submitted: 27 February 2024 Reviewed: 02 April 2024 Published: 03 July 2024