Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Possible Chemotherapeutic Potential of Inhibiting N-Alpha Terminal Acetylation Activities to Combat Trypanosome Infections

Written By

Stephen Ochaya

Reviewed: 17 October 2023 Published: 30 November 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.113762

Trypanosoma - Recent Advances and New Perspectives IntechOpen
Trypanosoma - Recent Advances and New Perspectives Edited by Saeed El-Ashram

From the Edited Volume

Trypanosoma - Recent Advances and New Perspectives [Working Title]

Dr. Saeed El-Ashram, Dr. Abdulaziz Alouffi and Prof. Dkhil Mohamed

Chapter metrics overview

36 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

New anti-trypanosome drugs focusing on N-alpha terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) interference are necessary scientific inputs because currently, many of the drugs in use are unacceptably toxic; moreover, resistance is emerging. Nt-acetylation transfers an acetyl molecule to the N-alpha terminal of a protein by enzymes called N-alpha terminal acetyltransferases (Nats). Nats are grouped according to their amino acid sequence at the N-terminus where they acetylate. It is conserved in all kingdoms of life, and in humans, approximately 80% of proteins are thought to be Nt-acetylated. NatA-NatF and NatH identified in humans, and NatG has been observed in plants. Nats play critical roles in several cellular processes and integrity and have been suggested as possible drug targets to control different cancer diseases. NatA and NatC have been partially characterized in trypanosomes and shown to be essential for parasite viability. Biologically, the way parasites program their lives is embedded in their unique organelles, metabolic pathways, gene regulation, epigenetic gene activities, and many virulence factors including surface molecules. These characteristics and the different protein-coding genes involved could be Nt-acetylated, and the inhibition of Nats can deny the ability of trypanosomes to survive in any environment because many proteins can be simultaneously affected.

Keywords

  • acetyltransferases
  • N-alpha terminal acetyltransferase
  • drug targets
  • Trypanosoma brucei
  • Trypanosoma cruzi
  • infectious disease

1. Introduction

Protein N-alpha terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) is an essential process carried out by N-alpha acetyl transferase (Nat) enzymes and can be useful as a drug target for controlling infectious diseases, including those caused by trypanosomes. Trypanosoma parasites (Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei) affect millions of people in both developing and developed countries, according to the World Health Organization 2023 (WHO 2023) and as suggested elsewhere [1]. Moreover, tropical neglected diseases other than malaria and tuberculosis result in up to 112 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) [2]; see also Table 1. Trypanosomes have unique biological features and alternate between vertebrates and invertebrates during their life cycles [3, 4]. In addition, they have many developmental stages, and Trypanosoma cruzi enters the host cell, in contrast to Trypanosoma brucei, which is extracellular [3, 4].

DiseasePathogenic agentVectorPeople infected (inf) and at risk in millions (M)Deaths and new cases/yearEconomic loss/year
MalariaPlasmodium falciparumFemale Anopheles mosquitoAbout 50% of the world population at risk0.619 M with 80% deaths in children, 0.247 M casesReduced economic growth by about 1.3%
SchistosomiasisSchistosoma speciesSnail species200 M (inf), 700 M at risk11,792 deathsAbout US $5.5 billion
* Chagas diseaseTrypanosoma cruziTriatomines bugsAbout 6-7 M (inf), 75 M at riskAbout 0.012 M deaths, 0.3 M new cases.About US $7.19 billion
* LeishmaniasisLeishmania speciesPhlebotomine sand flies12 M (inf), 350 M at risk0.03 M deaths, 1 M cases.75% of affected households
* Sleeping SicknessTrypanosoma bruceiTsetse flies0.11 M (inf), 70 M at riskAbout 0.5 M deaths, 2.800 new casesUS $1.5 billion
River Blindness (Onchocerchiasis)Filarial parasite Onchocerca volvulusSimulium blackflies18 M (inf) and 0.27 M blinded, 220 M at riskAbout 40.000 new blindUS $3.2–6.9 billion
Lymphatic FilariasisWucheria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, Brugia timoriMosquitos in the genera
Culex, Anopheles, Mansonia and Aedes
51 M (inf), over 882 M at risk40 M disfigured, about 36 M casesUS $5.8 billion

Table 1.

Selected parasites and tropical diseases. *parasitic diseases caused by kinetoplastids (source; WHO 2023, 2022, 2021 reports).

To date, no vaccine or effective drug is available to treat diseases caused by these two parasitic organisms, although some attempts have been made [5, 6]. The genome sequences produced and published [7, 8, 9, 10, 11] have greatly improved our understanding of molecular biology of trypanosomes. Thus, high-throughput drug target identification using RNA interference is currently advancing [12]. Furthermore, integrative genomic and bioinformatics mining is possible, and can be used to facilitate target selection for new anti-Trypanosoma activities [13, 14, 15, 16].

Other than mining the genome to fish what is druggable, a given parasite protein or organelle information such as mitochondrion [17], different from human protein/machinery, essential for parasite way of life, the genome sequences of trypanosomes (T. brucei and T. cruzi) have enabled identification of homologs/orthologs of genes in other organisms that have been validated as drug targets. Of interest are genes encoding lysine acetyltransferases/histone acetyltransferases, and pipeline N-alpha terminal acetyltransferases (Nats). Acetyltransferases are powerful enzymes responsible for protein acetylation (post-translational modifications) and are important for cellular integrity [18]. In the absence of this, cells may not perform biological tasks. Histone acetyltransferases (Hats), also known as lysine acetyltransferases (Lats), transfer acetyl from acetyl-CoA to the lysine residues of a protein sequence, known as Nε acetylation. It is a reversible process mediated by deacetylases (HDACs), in contrast to Nα acetylation, see Figure 1. The biological significance of histone acetylation has attracted much attention because it correlates with chromatin structure [19, 20, 21]. An imbalance between HAT and HDAC activity is associated with carcinogenesis [22]. Many small inhibitors that target HDAC are in use or are under clinical trials to control cancer [23, 24].

Figure 1.

Protein acetylation. A. Lysine/histone acetyltransferase (HATs), a reversible process by histone deacetylases (HDs/HDACs). B. N-alpha terminal acetyltransferase (NAT), thought to be non-reversible process.

Protein Nt-acetylation is thought to be a permanent modification carried out by Nats, which are enzymes that transfer acetyl moieties to the N-alpha terminal amino acids of the protein sequence [25]. In humans, seven Nats, NatA-NatF, and NatH, have been identified [26]. The groups of Nats are justified depending on their substrate preferences [26]. It is common for different Nats to have a catalytic subunit that contains an acetyl-CoA structure and one or more auxiliary subunits with different molecular weights [27]. In most cases, these subunits co-sediment with ribosomes [28].

Nt-acetylation is thought to be present in all kingdoms of life and has been suggested to determine cell fate and survival [29]. At the molecular level, the biological importance of Nt-acetylation has been shown to have a variety of effects on its substrates, including i) protein complex formation, ii) protein targeting, iii) protein degradation, and iv) inhibition of post-translational ER translocation [26, 30]. In cancer biology, Nt-acetylation is being investigated as a possible chemotherapeutic [30, 31]. The first design and synthesis of Nat inhibitors has recently been reported, indicating that Nat could be selectively inhibited, highlighting the possibility of developing drug-like properties for functional investigation and treatment [32].

Nat studies, particularly the identification of substrates in which they acetylate in trypanosomes, have just begun [33, 34, 35]. Only NatA and NatC have been experimentally and partially examined in trypanosomes [34, 36]. Interestingly, the data indicated that the acetylate substrates of the proteins were similar to those observed in humans and yeast [25, 37]. Furthermore, the predicted substrate sequences in trypanosomes, as assessed [34], are present in the genes used by the parasite during infection, suggesting that trypanosomes Nats activities could be involved in parasite-host interaction and that inhibition of the enzymes could block parasite infectivity. The predicted acetylation state in trypanosomes could be as high as 70–80 percent [34], suggesting that the cellular integrity of parasites or their lives greatly depends on this post-translational modification. Thus, the chance of organisms causing infectious diseases to survive is limited if the Nats or pathways leading to the production of acetyl-CoA are inhibited. Downstream/upstream effects may simultaneously affect hundreds to thousands of proteins, denying their ability to execute their biological functions, thereby causing the death of pathogens.

In this chapter, I highlight trypanosome biology, notably organelles, gene regulation, epigenetic mechanisms, trypanosome population structures, some metabolic characteristics, and virulent factors, such as surface molecules and other recommended drug targets. The question is whether the components of different protein-coding genes essential for parasite survival are Nt-acetylated, providing merits for Nats as novel drug targets. Later, I will summarize information about different Nats, and their significance as analyzed in different organisms, and possibly, similar biological functions are executed in trypanosomes. Finally, I discuss the inhibition of Nats as a new target for interventions to control diseases caused by trypanosomes. This is because the inhibition of Nats can simultaneously affect several proteins in different pathways and multiple surface molecules, and the parasite machinery that causes infections is destroyed.

Advertisement

2. Some highlights of trypanosomes and their biology

Kinetoplastida organisms (T. brucei, T. cruzi, and Leishmania), cause life-threatening infections in humans as reported by WHO 2022 and as suggested elsewhere [3839]. Trypanosoma brucei causes human African Trypanosomiasis/sleeping sickness and Nagana in livestock [40]. It is transmitted by the Tsetse fly, Glossina species. In humans, the acute form is caused by T. brucei rhodesiense, which is transmitted by savanna species of tsetse flies, confined to East African countries, and lethal if not treated. The chronic form is caused by T. brucei gambiense, mainly found in Central and Western African countries, and is transmitted by riverine tsetse [40]. In later stages, both species can cross the brain barrier and cause neuropsychiatric-related problems, leading to death [40, 41]. Several species of T. brucei infect animals, notably T. brucei (infects all domestic animals and wild animals), T. congolense (burden on domestic animals and many wild animals), T. vivax (domestic animals and ruminants), T. simiae (infects domestic and wild pigs), and T. evansi (mainly infects camels) [42].

T. cruzi, common in Latin American countries and the Southern part of the USA, causes American Trypanosomiasis/Chagas disease [43]. The disease has two forms: an asymptomatic short acute phase, and, when not treated, it develops into a chronic phase decades later. It is mainly transmitted by the reduviid bug (triatomine bug) and through other sources such as contaminated blood during blood transfusion, organ transplant, congenital transmission, accidental transmission during laboratory work, ingestion of contaminated food, and organ transplantation [44]. Migration from infected to non-endemic regions has increased transmission beyond the American continent [45]. The magnitude of trypanosomes and burden of other parasites and causative agents are summarized in Table 1.

The life cycle of trypanosomes is complex, as they alternate between vertebrates and invertebrate [3, 46]; see Figure 2. During this process, they undergo several morphological changes to adapt to the new environment. It is known that T. cruzi enters the host cell in contrast to T. brucei, which is extracellular, see Figure 2, raising the peculiar biology of the two organisms and how they circumvent immune challenges, as discussed later in this chapter. Mindful of the possible control of Trypanosoma infections, it is important to highlight a few biological features and ask whether the proteins involved have Nt-acetylation signatures.

Figure 2.

Life cycle of trypanosomes. A. T. brucei where numbers are represented as follows: 1. Tsetse fly takes blood meal and injects metacyclic trypomastigotes. 2. Metacyclic trypomastigotes transform into trypomastigotes. 3. Trypomastigotes divide by binary fission. 4. Trypomastigote circulating in the blood. 5. Trypomastigotes ingested by tsetse fly during feeding. 6. Trypomastigotes transform into procyclic trypomastigote in the tsetse fly midgut and divide. 7. Procyclic trypomastigotes transform into epimastigotes. 8. In salivary gland, epimastigotes transform into infective metacyclic trypomastigotes. B. T. cruzi where numbers represented as follows: 1. Triatomine bug takes a blood meal and passes in the feces infective metacyclic trypomastigotes. 2. Metacyclic trypomastigotes penetrate cells and transform into amastigotes 3. Amastigotes multiply inside the cell. 4. Amastigotes transform into trypomastigotes, then come out of the cell into the bloodstream. 5. Triatomine bug takes blood meal and ingests trypomastigotes. 6. In the midgut, trypomastigotes transform into epimastigotes. 7. Epimastigotes divide by binary fusion and multiply in the midgut. 8. In the hint gut, epimastigotes transform into infective metacyclic trypomastigotes.

2.1 Some unique biological characteristics of trypanosomes

Unique features in trypanosomes make the study of organisms interesting, although it could be problematic given the unusual biochemical and morphological characteristics, leaving alone genetic traits. Trypanosomatids (T. cruzi and T. brucei) have unique organelles such as kinetoplasts (containing kinetoplast DNA) [47] and glycosomes (containing glycolytic enzymes) [48], in contrast to mammals, which have the enzymes in the cytosol. There is also an acidocalcisome (high concentrations of calcium and sodium ions, with most proteins thought to be transporters) [49, 50]. Flagellar pockets (perform endocytic activities) [51], reservosomes (accumulate endocytosed macromolecules) rich in cysteine proteinase [52], and RNA granules (sites for storage, processing, and degradation of RNA) [53]. Furthermore, mitochondria, which surround the kinetoplast, provide characteristic signals and generate reactive oxygen species [54]. Additionally, there are mitochondrial calcium ions and reaction species, which are an overload of calcium ions, leading to the generation of oxygen reaction species, important to parasites [55], and contractile vacuoles, which are important in osmoregulation [56].

The different organelle structures in Trypanosomatids, useful in functional analyses, have been presented using fluorescent-tagged proteins [54]. Indeed, some basic cell biology of Trypanosoma parasites have been examined elsewhere [50, 57, 58]. It is time to profile the proteomic components of different trypanosome organelles and assess the Nt-acetylation state. I imagine that some of the proteins constituting trypanosome organelles could be highly Nt-acetylated, and that inhibition of Nats may interfere with their normal functions. In addition to organelles, the regulation of nuclear gene expression is completely different from that in other eukaryotes, as briefly discussed in Section 2.2.

2.2 Gene regulation

The complexity of the life cycle of trypanosomes dictates that they must undergo several transformations to acquaint themselves with environmental cues, which include temperature changes, immune challenges from the host, drug pressure, and the possibility of acquiring nutrients. Moreover, in the same host, they ought to transform from the proliferation stage to the nondividing stage, see Figure 2. Therefore, drastic measures must be taken to coordinate gene expression. In contrast to other eukaryotes, gene expression in trypanosomes is very unusual [58], and they regulate their genes post-transcriptionally; that is, genes are organized in long polycistronic units and transcribed by RNA polymerase II [58, 59], see Figure 3. As examined previously [60], it is intriguing that some Variant Surface Glycoprotein (VSG) genes in T. brucei are transcribed by RNA polymerase I. VSG is a key antigen used by T. brucei to survive in mammalian hosts because of its capacity to vary to confuse host immune challenges; thus, they escape by switching the dense protective coat of VSG [61]. Furthermore, the parasite is equipped with a repertoire of VSG, about 15, which direct VSG transcription [62], and only one VSG gene is expressed at a time from the telomeric expression site (ES). Indeed, antigen variation is common in many parasites, and understanding the proteins and pathways leading to survival mechanisms requires further investigation, although this has been discussed recently [62].

Figure 3.

Trans -splicing and polycistronic transcription.

On another note, how trypanosomes regulate their gene could depend on ribosomal RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) since they act as modulators of mRNA abundance [63], leave alone promoting cell differentiation [64, 65]. Disruption of RBP33 in trypanosomes results in overexpression of approximately 40% of all annotated genes in the genome [66]. Moreover, the knockout of three RBPs, TcZC3H39, TcZC3H29, and TcZC3HTTP, in T. cruzi using CRISPR-Cas9, resulted in morphological changes of the parasite, suggesting the significance of RBPs in parasite survival [67]. Additionally, the RNA-binding protein DRBD18 has been implicated in the export of a subset of mRNA [68]. The processed RNAs should be transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and the way trypanosomes transport their mRNA from the nucleus deviates from that of other eukaryotes as previously examined [69]. Taken together, the proteins involved in mRNA turnover may be interesting targets for therapeutic interventions. Therefore, it is time to profile the mRNA binding proteins, determine possible pathways in which they are engaged, and assess whether they have Nt-acetylation signatures and what consequences they may have on parasite survival if acetylation states are denied. This may aid in developing new strategies for intervention by inhibiting Nats.

The advancement of new technologies, such as RNA-seq, has improved our knowledge of the transcriptome of kinetoplastids [70, 71]. Furthermore, a multi-step control of gene expression, providing new information about T. cruzi proliferative proteins, was presented [72], highlighting T. cruzi cell cycle-regulated genes. In other studies, T. cruzi transcriptomics has revealed many upregulated genes, such as mucin-associated proteins involved in infection, providing potential drug targets to control T. cruzi infection [73, 74]. Interestingly, using single-cell sequencing, detailed biological events during parasite development, especially gene expression patterns and identification of putative gene regulators, are now possible [75]. However, direct sequencing of the T. brucei transcriptome has identified 32 novel long non-coding RNA (lncRNAs), which are stage-specifically expressed [76], informing the scientific community of the complexity of the parasite transcriptome, which includes alternative transcriptional start and stop sites. In summary, it can be hypothesized that proteins involved in the proliferation of trypanosomes could be Nt-acetylated and, collectively, their functional capabilities, if interfered with by inhibiting Nats, could deny trypanosomatids survival strategies.

2.3 Highlight of epigenetics

As part of gene regulation, there is growing evidence that epigenetics (control of gene activity without changing the DNA sequence) is a key player in the way trypanosomes program or aid their survival capabilities [77, 78]. DNA methylation is the most common epigenetic mechanism, where a methyl molecule is attached to the DNA building blocks, causing the gene to be silenced/turned off [79, 80]. Histone modification is another important epigenetic marker; for example, methyl or acetyl groups are added or removed, and this determines the turning off or on of a gene, or one of the genes, and any errors caused, can lead to normal or abnormal gene activity [19, 81]. A detailed review highlighting epigenetic marks in kinetoplastids was presented [21], recommending multiprotein complexes involved in chromatin machinery as possible drug targets. The question is whether the components of these different protein complexes are Nt-acetylated. If so, the underlying cellular programming will be revealed, and guilty Nats will be used as possible drug targets for control strategies. Much as gene regulation in trypanosomes is being discovered, it is important to bear in mind Trypanosomatids population structures to drive trypanosome control.

2.4 Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei genetic diversity and clinical implications

It is known that T. cruzi species are heterogeneous and recognized as T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II, which is further divided into six to seven discrete typing units (DTUs) based on the nucleotide sequence [82, 83, 84]. The detailed aspects of different DTUs and their significance for parasite survival in both human and insect hosts are discussed elsewhere [83]. T. cruzi undergoes genetic exchange [85] and mixed infections occur. Hybrid lineages [86] are common; notably, TcIII-TcIV is suggested to have arisen because of ancestral recombination between TcI and TcII, and TcV-TcVI arose because of recombination between TcII and TcII [85, 87]. The population structure complexities of T. cruzi strains may be regarded as multiclonal [88], as those isolated from insects may differ from clinical samples [88]. For parasites assessed in chronic Chagas-infected patients and non-human hosts, TcII/VI was associated with domestic cycles and patients with chronic Chagas disease, and the predominant genotype was documented as TcII [89]. TcI was also observed in two human and triatomine samples [89]. This finding further confirmed the genetic polymorphism of T. cruzi bloodstream populations in Chagas disease, showing a TcII prevalence of 74.3% [89]. Geographically, TcI is common in North Amazon areas and is linked to cardiomyopathy in these countries [88], whereas TcVI is common in South American countries and is associated with megacolon, megaoesophagus, and cardia-related complications [90, 91]. Recently, epidemiological data on DTUs have been presented [92], suggesting that, DTUs are widespread across the American continent. In terms of treatment, the DTUs can no longer be ignored, and with no proper drugs available, T. cruzi genetic polymorphisms add to another layer of the parasite life complexities, which may be programmed by Nt-acetylation; therefore, deeper analyses of Nats are warranted.

For T. brucei, the population structure has implications in determining epidemiology [93]. Moreover, in another study, stable genotypes rather than new genotypes maintained endemicity [94]. Genetic exchange in T. brucei was suggested to differ from that in T. cruzi and appears to involve meiotic cell division, but not hybridization [95]. However, recent studies have suggested widespread hybridization, which involves human infective and non-human infective trypanosomes of T. brucei, circulating in sub-Saharan African countries with a risk of generating serious virulent Trypanosoma brucei strains [96]. This might dramatically increase T. brucei infection in the population, with further demand for new chemotherapeutics [97]. Given the different population structures of trypanosomes, it is worth perusing Nats as possible drag targets, because they are likely to cut across, and may be useful in the fight against all trypanosome strains and structures.

2.5 Trypanosomes virulent factors

It is worth mentioning some key virulence factors trypanosomes use to circumvent the human immune system. The virulence factors-coding proteins could be Nt-acetylated in large numbers in trypanosomatids. For T. cruzi to evade the host, the parasite expresses on its surface, several members of protein families:

2.5.1 Trans sialidase (TS)

Trans sialidase (TS) superfamily has about 1430 gene members [98]. TS activity involves the transfer of sialic acid from host glycoconjugates to parasite mucins present in the plasma membrane of trypomastigotes. The inability of T. cruzi to synthesize monosaccharide sialic acid forces the parasite to scavenge it from the infected host via TS activity [9]. Therefore, sialylation in T. cruzi is crucial for its viability and propagation into the host [99].

2.5.2 Mucin

T. cruzi is coated with a series of glycoproteins, which mainly belong to the mucin (TcMUC) family, used by the parasite for protection and in infectivity [100, 101]. The family comprises approximately 863 genes, of which 201 are pseudogenes [9].

2.5.3 Mucin-associated surface proteins (MASPs) family

The genome sequence revealed the MASPs family, where the name is derived because of its proximity to TcMUC [9]. Structurally, members of the MASPs family are similar to TcMUC, and their sequences are different [9, 102]. In total, the genome has discovered about 1400 member gene families encoding MASP [9]. There were variations among the strains [103]. Experimental evidence suggests that MASPs are simultaneously expressed throughout the parasite life cycle, that is in epimastigote, trypomastigote, and amastigote stages [104]. Moreover, in trypomastigotes, the bias of multiple MASP variants toward a particular MASP subgroup was revealed [102]. The plethora of MASP and the second largest gene family in T. cruzi, have been presented [105], suggesting that MASP is involved in mechanisms of host–parasite interactions. Furthermore, it is necessary for the infection process, as shown by analyzing mucin-associated surface protein 49 (MASP49) [106].

2.5.4 TcGP63 family

T. cruzi zinc-metalloprotease (TcGP63) has many copies in its genome [9]. It is expressed at all life stages of the parasite, its expression is regulated during parasite differentiation, the individual isoforms of TcGP63 play a role in host cell infection [107, 108]. Two key TcGP63 families, TcGP63-I and TcGP63-II, have been identified and have 5–10 and 62 gene copies, respectively [109]. While TcGP63-I is attached to the parasite by a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor signal, TcGP63-II does not have a GPI-anchor signal [110].

2.5.5 Amastin family

Amastin is mainly expressed in amastigotes, the mammalian stage of the parasite, during the life cycle. They are groups of transmembrane glycoproteins possessing two distinct subfamilies: β- and δ-amastins, which are thought to play a role in proton or ion trafficking across the membrane [111] and in T. cruzi infection [112]. A total of 14 copies of amastin genes have been identified in the parasite [111].

2.5.6 TcTASV family

T. cruzi Trypomastigote Alanine Serine Valine-rich protein (TcTASV), expressed mainly in trypomastigotes, is a family with 40 members [113] and possibly plays a significant role in host-parasite interactions, thus being a significant virulence factor [114].

2.5.7 Cruzipain family

Cruzipains are major papain-like cysteine proteases expressed mainly in epimastigotes and amastigote bodies, in contrast to the trypomastigote form where they are expressed only in the flagellar pocket [115]. Later, cruzipains were grouped into two families and four subtypes [116]. In addition, 67 genes encoding cruzipain have been identified in different T. cruzi strains [116].

Cruzipain has been implicated in host-parasite interactions [117]. Some detailed characteristics of the T. cruzi surface molecules have been discussed elsewhere [98]. Taken together, T. cruzi employs many strategies to differentiate, survive, evade the immune system, and infect its host. These strategies, especially the modulation of virulence potentials, are carried out, among others, by surface molecules [118], the majority of which are probably Nt-acetylated, and inhibition of Nats could abolish infection.

For T. brucei, the main surface molecule used by the parasite to survive is the variant surface glycoprotein (VSG), which encodes approximately 806 genes [119]. The detailed strategies for how T. brucei uses VSG to survive in the host have been presented [120]. However, in the insect stage, T. brucei forms (procyclic), and the VSG coat is replaced by procyclic acidic repetitive protein (PARP) and glutamic acid-rich protein (GARP) [121].

Arguably, various ways in which trypanosomes circumvent environmental cues and propagate may significantly depend on the surface molecules, which are in their hundreds. If these molecules are Nt-acetylated, which was predicted to be the case [34], then the simultaneous inhibition of their activities is possible by interfering with Nats. As mentioned before, Nt-acetylation is a post-translational modification of a protein, which can be measured by proteomics.

Advertisement

3. Proteomics

Trypanosomes differ in species and in the diseases they cause. Integration of different data, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, may provide a better picture of parasites´ ways of life. Trypanosome genomic data [8, 9] and comparative genomic information [122] have made it possible to identify possible drug targets for individual trypanosomes or drug targets shared by the two organisms. Indeed, it is now possible for scientists to examine integrated functional genomics in a database, the so-called TriTrypDB [123], and examine the molecular insights of kinetoplastid organisms (T. brucei, T. cruzi, and leishmania). To improve the gain, protein studies may be of huge benefit since gene expression in trypanosomes appears to be posttranscriptional, rendering nucleic acid studies less informative [124], yet most drugs target proteins.

3.1 Proteomic efforts to identify new drug targets in trypanosomes

In trypanosomes, proteomic studies using mass spectrometry have revealed proteins that are highly expressed in different developmental stages and those expressed in some distinct pathways, proteins observed to be virulent factors, and many more, which could be used for drug development or as vaccine candidates [125126]. The fundamental question is to what extent these proteins are post-translationally modified, especially with respect to Nt-acetylation.

Advertisement

4. Post-translational modification of proteins in trypanosomes

The functionality of proteins in a cell is partly attributed to post-translational modifications. Proteins released from the ribosome often undergo post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation [127], protein glycosylation [126, 128], SUMOylation (attachment of small ubiquitin-like modifier) [126], N-terminal methylation [129, 130], and lysine acetylation. Before Nt-acetylation is discussed in detail as a possible chemotherapeutic, it is important to highlight some common strategies employed to eradicate trypanosomatid infections.

Advertisement

5. Control and eradication strategies for Trypanosoma infections

No vaccine is available to control infections caused by trypanosomatids. Attempts to find an effective vaccine thus far are far long from ideal due to parasite antigenic variations and T. cruzi hides inside the cell [6, 131]. However, genetic editing using CRISPR–Cas9 is a promising tool, that is useful for assessing vaccine candidates, as demonstrated in Leishmania major, a parasite closely related to trypanosomes [132]. Controlling vectors to disrupt trypanosome transmission has not yet succeeded [133134]. Therefore, chemotherapeutics is a better option. Unfortunately, for T. cruzi, there are only two drugs in the market, Benznidazole and Nifurtimox, which have different efficacies for different parasite life cycle stages [135, 136]. Moreover, the benefits of these drugs to human health are problematic owing to their adverse side effects [135, 137].

For T. brucei, pentamidine is used as the first-line drug for early symptoms of West African trypanosomiasis caused by T. brucei gambiense [138]. Eflornithine is used as the first-line drug for the second stage of West African trypanosomiasis, Suramin is the drug of choice for early T. brucei rhodesiense infection in East African trypanosomiasis. Melarsoprol can cross the blood-brain barrier and is used in the management of central nervous system symptoms in the second stage of T. brucei rhodesiense infections [139]. Generally, current drugs are far from ideal when it comes to the late or chronic stage [140, 141]. However, Fexinidazole and Acroziborole are promising drugs against African trypanosomiasis, and already, Fexinidazole has been approved for the treatment of T. b. gambiense and clinical trial is ongoing for T. b. rhodesiense [6]. Fexinidazole is also undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of Chagas disease and oxarbazole is in phase I clinical trial [6].

The efforts to find new drug targets against trypanosome infections are advancing, notably interference with the trypanothione metabolism pathway [142], calcium homeostasis, nucleoside analog targeting purine salvage pathway, and drug combination of low-cost molecules in T. cruzi [143, 144]. Furthermore, it is now possible to perform in silico analysis to identify new drug targets in trypanosomes [14, 145]. Several new molecular targets eligible for clinical trials have been identified [6]. Regardless of the drug targets available, clinical evidence in humans must be presented and convincing. Therefore, a combination therapy with different modes of action is needed. In that aspect, I imagine that interference of Nt-acetylation may provide the answer, where several proteins in different pathways, proteins encoding surface molecules, and others, may be affected at the same time.

Advertisement

6. N-terminal acetylation

One of the most common PTM of proteins, described as regulatory modifications as important as phosphorylation, is protein acetylation [146]. In this process, an acetyl molecule is transferred from acetyl-CoA to the N-terminal or internal residue of a protein by acetyltransferase enzymes. N-alpha terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) is common in all kingdoms [147] and is thought to be a permanent protein modification, see Figure 1. It is carried out by N-alpha acetyltransferases (Nats). Nt-acetylation has been poorly investigated in trypanosomes, yet the modification as shown in other organisms, is linked to various biological cellular processes and can determine the fate of the cell by influencing protein folding, activity, protein localization, and many more [148]. Using proteomics, the acetylation state in many organisms has been defined and found to vary. Approximately 80% in humans, 75% in plants, 60% in yeast, and 18% in archaea [149, 150, 151]. Recent evidence suggests that Nt-acetylation is required for bacterial virulence [152, 153]. Nats are categorized according to the amino acid sequence of the N-terminus in which they acetylate. Thus, in human, NatA to NatF and NatH, NatG in the plant has been defined and their known substrates, dictated by the first few amino acid residues at the N-terminal of a protein, are displayed elsewhere [26], see also Table 2.

N-alpha acetyl transferaseCatalytic subunitSubstrate preferences
NatANAA10S, A, T, V, C, G
NatBNAA20ME, MD, MN and MQ
NatCNAA30MI, ML, MF, MY and MK
NatDNAA40SGRGK on Histone H2A and Histone H4
NatENAA50MA, MV, MS and MT
NatFNAA60ML, MI, MF, MK and MY
NatGNAA70M. A, S, T (in Plant)
NatHNAA80DDD, EEE (only on Actin)

Table 2.

Showing major Nats and their substrates. Note that NatB, C, E and F, maintain methionine, that is, methionine is not removed by methionine aminopeptidase enzyme.

Generally, each Nat has a catalytic subunit (containing an acetyl-CoA structure), and some have one or more auxiliary subunits [154]. The auxiliary subunits are thought to influence the catalytic subunit activity. To date, only the catalytic subunit and no auxiliary subunits have been identified for NatD (NAA40) [155], NatF (NAA60) [150], NatG (NAA70) [156], and NatH (NAA80) [157]. NatB and NatC have the catalytic subunits NAA20 and NAA30, with one and two auxiliary subunits, respectively [158, 159]. NatA has the catalytic subunit NAA10 and the commonly known auxiliary subunit NAA15, whereas NatE has the catalytic subunit NAA50 [26]. However, recent evidence suggests that NAA50, together with huntingtin-interacting protein K (HYPK) forms part of the NatA complex [160], yet NAA50 is also part of the NatE complex together with NAA10 and NAA15, displaying distinct substrate specificity [160]. It is known that NatA to NatF are conserved from yeast to humans and co-sediment with the ribosome [160], suggesting a co-translational function. In humans, NatA has the largest pool of substrates at about 31–38%, followed by NatB at approximately 21%, and NatCEF at 21% [18]. To date, little is known about the preferences of Nats and their substrates in parasites, especially in trypanosomatids. Therefore, I will briefly mention some known molecular significance of Nat, as analyzed in other organisms, and contemplate that similar biological functions may be true for trypanosomes.

6.1 NatA

As mentioned previously, NatA is the most common Nat in both humans and plants [26, 161], and it acetylates co-translationally small amino acids, notably serine, glycine, alanine, threonine, and cystine, although post-translationally, it acetylates proteins with acidic side chains [162]. NatA is implicated in the regulation of gene transcription and cell motility [163] and other evidence indicates that NatA altered gene expression, notably, sub-telomeric genes, and nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial ribosomal proteins [164]. Moreover, the significance of NatA and its developmental roles in cells have also been discussed [165]. Additionally, the biological significance of NatA in mammals, plants, yeast, C. elegans, and prokaryotes has been presented elsewhere [160, 162]. In cancer biology, excess or deficiency of NatA is associated with various tumor diseases, such as liver, lung, colon, breast, and prostate cancers [166].

Nats´ studies in trypanosomatids, especially the identification of substrates, have not been paid attention to, although an attempt was made by proteomics to understand the acetylation state of different parasite life cycle stages in T. cruzi [35]. In addition, partial characterization and substrate profiling of NatA in trypanosomes have been reported [34]. Interestingly, these data indicate that the proteins acetylate substrates as has been shown in humans and yeast [34]. Given the diverse cellular functions of NatA, it is tempting to believe that its inhibition kills the parasites, as demonstrated in T. brucei [36], suggesting its chemotherapeutic potential. Thus far, it is unknown which proteins are acetylated by NatA in trypanosomatids.

6.2 NatB

NatB is the second most abundant Nat in eukaryotes, and is conserved from yeast to humans [159, 167]. It acetylates Met-Asn-, Met-Asp-, Met-Gln-, and Met-Glu-starting N-terminus [159]. In cancer, NatB promotes hepatocyte carcinoma [168] and has been proposed as a drug target to combat liver cancer [169]. One of the key roles of NatB is its involvement in mitochondrial inheritance and the organization of the actin cytoskeleton [170]. Considering that NatB participates in actin cytoskeleton function and if inhibited, can disrupt the cell proliferative signaling pathway, one can imagine that similar functions are also true for trypanosomes. Actin, as a component of the cytoskeleton, performs a wide range of cellular functions, including the regulation of endocytosis and intracellular trafficking in trypanosomes [171], which are important for parasite survival. It will be of interest to assess whether these sets of actin-binding proteins are Nt-acetylated.

NatB is involved in viral polymerase activity [172]. In trypanosomes, protein-coding genes are transcribed together as long polycistronic precursor RNAs [173], which is unusual. It is of interest to assess whether the different subunits of RNA polymerase in trypanosomes have NatB signatures or any other Nats. In plants, NatB has been associated with multiple stress responses [174]. Given the way trypanosomatids survive, they must adapt to several environmental stresses by directing their cellular machinery to transform into different life cycle stages in both vertebrates and invertebrates. Therefore, NatB may be a key player in these biological events and substrate screening is worth investigating. NatB predominantly affects protein folding and plays a key role in cellular homeostasis [164]. In trypanosomatids, redox balance [175], mitochondrial calcium ion uptake [176], biogenesis and metabolic homeostasis [177], and pH homeostasis of organelle (acidocalcisome) [49] are all important homeostasis processes necessary for parasite survival. The cellular protein components responsible for homeostasis, are likely to be Nt-acetylated, providing grounds to assess inhibitory effects of the guilty Nats on parasite viability, which will aid the recommendation of Nats as possible new therapeutic targets.

6.3 NatC

Like NatB, NatC acetylates proteins with no methionine removed; that is, NatC acetylates protein N-termini starting with methionine, followed by a hydrophobic or amphipathic amino acid (ML-MI-, MF-MW-, MV-, MM, MH-, and MK-) [158]. NatC complex is composed of a catalytic subunit NAA30, and two auxiliary subunits NAA35 and NAA38 [158, 178]. NatC-mediated Nt-acetylation is essential for proper cell growth and development in eukaryotes as suggested elsewhere [37, 178]. It is also required for mitochondrial function [158]. NatC plays a significant role in photosynthesis in plants [179]. Little is known about NatC in trypanosomes. An attempt to characterize the protein in T. cruzi was made, and substrate preferences were profiled [34]. Using the RNAi technique on T. brucei equivalent, NatC was observed to be essential for parasite growth, suggesting that NatC knockdown in trypanosomes may affect infection [34].

6.4 NatD

NatD (NAA40) is a highly selective Nat that specifically acetylates histones H2A (Ser-Gly-Arg-) and H4 (Ser-Gly-Gly-) [155, 180]. Histone Nt-acetylation by NAA40 has been shown to greatly affect gene expression, chromatin function, aging, metabolic processes and cancer [181]. It seems that NAA40 does not exist in trypanosomes because no human NatD ortholog has been detected [35], raising the question of whether NatD is irrelevant in cellular programming in these organisms. However, NAA40 is also conserved from yeast to humans [155].

6.5 NatE

NatE (NAA50) acetylates substrates, including Met-starting N-termini: Met-Ala-, Met-Lys-, Met-Met-, Met-Phe-, Met-Ser-, Met-Thr-, Met-Tyr-, and Met-Val [182]. Although NAA50 interacts with NAA10, its enzymatic activity differs [183, 184]. In cancer, NAA50 regulates the cell cycle and proliferation in lung adenocarcinoma [185]. However, in plants NAA50 has been reported to play crucial roles in growth [186], development, and regulation of stress responses [187]. It remains to be seen whether NatE is present in trypanosomes and whether substrate profiles are like those in other organisms.

6.6 NatF

The NatF (NAA60) substrates are listed in Table 2. Different studies indicate that NatF is found only in higher eukaryotes, localizes to the Golgi membranes, acetylates transmembrane proteins, and is probably involved in Golgi structural organization [188, 189]. Additionally, the dual behavior of NatF as a histone acetyltransferase (Hat) and as Nat has been reported [190], indicating that NatF plays a role in epigenetics. The presence of NatF in T. cruzi has also been suggested [35]. Given the uniqueness of gene transcription in trypanosomes, protein post-translational events may be crucial for determining protein characteristics to execute their biological functions. These data indicate that trypanosomes histone are heavily modified post-translationally, including Nt-acetylation [21, 191]. Therefore, if NatF substrates are proven and linked to histone Nt-acetylation in trypanosomes, then molecular insights into gene regulation in these organisms will be discovered, providing a new approach for controlling trypanosomiasis.

6.7 NatG

NatG (NAA70) is only found in plants, acetylating M-, A-, S-, and T-starting-termini as substrates [156]. It is of interest to assess whether NatG is present in any Trypanosoma strain, and its significance investigated.

6.8 NatH

NatH (NAA80) is widespread, has been identified only in animals [157], and is not associated with the ribosome as for NatA-E; moreover, it acts post-translationally. It acetylates ß- and γ-actin substrates with acidic N-termini DDDI and EEEI, respectively [192, 193]. NatH plays a vital role in cytoskeletal organization and cell motility and acts post-translationally [157]. Furthermore, it is important to maintain the structural integrity of the Golgi apparatus in cells [194]. Similarly, if NatH exists in trypanosomes, one could speculate that the components of proteins involved in the Golgi apparatus, cytoskeleton organization, and proteins aiding motility in the two parasites may be Nt-acetylated by NatH. Thus, if proven, it can be a useful target for preventing parasite survival.

Advertisement

7. Remarks

Genome sequencing of trypanosomes has contributed to the molecular insights of these organisms. Moreover, comparative genomics has enabled identification of protein-coding genes shared between the two organisms. Given the posttranscriptional gene regulation mechanisms in trypanosomatids, PTM of protein is a necessary tool that is useful for studying and identifying relevant proteins that are Nt-acetylated for possible chemotherapeutic intervention to control trypanosomiasis.

The study of Nt-acetylation in parasitic organisms, such as malaria [195], Toxoplasma gondii [196], and Leishmania [197], has just begun. In trypanosomatids, only a handful of studies have been documented [34, 35], indicating that Nt-acetylation is common in these organisms and their inhibition interferes with parasite growth and survival [34, 36]. At the infant stage, a comparative acetylome in parasites is now possible [198], providing grounds to identify acetylated proteins specific to individual parasites or those shared between them.

As presented in Section 2.1, Nt-acetylation is involved in the integrity of organelle structure and function, notably in mitochondria, ribosome biogenesis, Golgi integrity, chromosome condensation, and viability [199]. Trypanosomes have unique organelles, as mentioned in Section 2.1, and the maintenance of these organelles may partly depend on Nt-acetylation. Furthermore, components of proteins involved in gene regulation, proteins involved in epigenetic machinery, and hundreds of surface protein-coding genes (molecules) used by the parasite to survive in different environments are all unique features for possible chemotherapeutic attacks against these pathogens. All these characteristics may be influenced by Nt-acetylation, and if Nats are inhibited, the survival strategies of trypanosomes will be denied. Therefore, I hypothesized that the cellular integrity and survival of trypanosomes in different environments may depend on Nt-acetylation. Nats may function as biological sensors in these organisms, where some Nats may be switched on and others shut down, depending on temperature and environmental cues. That said, I imagine that inhibition of Nats may simultaneously affect hundreds to thousands of proteins needed for parasite survival, ultimately killing the pathogen and abolishing the infection.

Thus far, much as suspected Nats in trypanosomatids are not characterized nor detailed substrates known, a gene editing tool using CRISPR-Cas9 can now be employed to assess the functional significance of suspected Nats. To date, the CRISPR-Cas9 method has been tested and used to assess gene functions [200], and the technology is being improved for Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of malaria [201]. Specifically, for Trypanosomes, CRISPR-Cas9 has been performed and is being used for the functional characterization and interrogation of none of the Nat proteins [202, 203, 204].

However, even if CRISPR-Cas9 is used to knock out already known Nats, identification and substrate screening of different Nats in trypanosomes will be an important move to unravel the molecular insight of parasite biology. Furthermore, the regulation of these Nats will be tested. Alternatively, what happens if Nats or pathways that lead to the production of acetyl-CoA are inhibited? For the latter, might this mean that all Nats´ activities may be simultaneously affected? The answer to these questions will provide deeper knowledge of parasite behavior and strengthen the protein Nt-acetylation capability as a tool to sustain trypanosomes survival, thus providing a strong basis for Nats as potential new drug targets. Collectively, scientific communities should pay attention to Nt-acetylation, which likely cuts across all species, causing infectious diseases for eventual eradication, particularly neglected tropical diseases, as viewed by the WHO. Specifically, it is important to highlight the role of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatid biology and the potential therapeutic implications of targeting Nt-acetylation in trypanosomes.

7.1 Role of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids biology

As mentioned previously, the role of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatid biology has not been extensively studied, but it is believed to play a role in regulating protein stability, activity, folding patterns, degradation, and protein-protein interactions [127]. Here are some of the specific roles of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids that have been suggested in the available search results: Degradation mechanism: In yeast, the Nt-acetyl group was first described as a specific degradation signal, where proteins with an acetylated N-terminal methionine, alanine, valine, serine, threonine, or cysteine are targeted for degradation by the E3 ligase Doa104 [18, 205]. Nt-acetylation may also act as a degradation mechanism for trypanosomatids. Protein stability: Nt-acetylation is associated with protein stability in various organisms, including trypanosomatids [18, 205]. It is possible that Nt-acetylation plays a role in regulating the stability of proteins in trypanosomatids. Protein-protein interactions: Nt-acetylation has been shown to mediate protein-protein interactions in yeast and other organisms [18]. Possibly, Nt-acetylation may play a role in regulating protein-protein interactions in trypanosomatids as well. Chemotherapeutic target: Studies on N-terminal acetylation as a possible chemotherapeutic target to fight parasite infections are limited [18, 33]. Understanding the role of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids could provide insights into potential therapeutic targets. Overall, the specific role and significance of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids have not been extensively explored. Further research is required to elucidate the specific mechanisms and functions of Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids.

7.2 Potential therapeutic implications of targeting Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids

The potential therapeutic implications of targeting Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids are not extensively explored in the available search results. However, there are potential therapeutic implications that can be inferred based on limited information. Drug target identification: Nt-acetyltransferases responsible for protein acetylation could be evaluated as potential drug targets in trypanosomatids. Targeting these enzymes could potentially disrupt protein acetylation processes and affect the stability, activity, or interactions of essential proteins in the parasites. Chemotherapeutic target: Although studies on N-terminal acetylation as a possible chemotherapeutic target in trypanosomatids are limited, understanding the role of Nt-acetylation could provide insights into potential therapeutic strategies [34]. Targeting the Nt-acetylation processes may offer a novel approach for developing drugs against trypanosomatid infections. Protein stability and regulation: Nt-acetylation has been implicated in regulating protein stability and other cellular processes [205]. Targeting Nt-acetylation can potentially disrupt protein stability and affect the survival and growth of trypanosomatids. Epigenetic regulation: Although not directly related to Nt-acetylation, the role of histone modifications in trypanosomatids has been investigated [21]. Understanding the interplay between Nt-acetylation and other epigenetic modifications may provide insights into the regulation of gene expression and potential therapeutic interventions. It is important to note that the potential therapeutic implications mentioned above are speculative and based on limited information. Further research is needed to explore the specific therapeutic potential of targeting Nt-acetylation in trypanosomatids, and to develop effective and safe treatment strategies.

Advertisement

8. Conclusions

There is scant information regarding Nt-acetylation in trypanosomes. However, the limited data presented suggests that it is common in these organisms. Only NatA and NatC are partially characterized in trypanosomatids, which are essential for parasite survival and growth. Therefore, a call to invest in Nats, vital enzymes for biological function, needs attention for possible assault to disrupt the parasite’s potential to cause infections. Trypanosome biology is unique when one considers their organelles, life cycle programming, gene regulation, epigenetic mechanisms, metabolism in different categories, or infection capabilities, where hundreds of surface molecules are employed. I suspect that many protein-coding genes responsible for parasite biology, in one way or another, are Nt-acetylated, or that the secret of trypanosomes survival is shouldered by Nt-acetylation. Therefore, inhibition of one Nat or several Nats can simultaneously affect many essential proteins and virulence factors, rendering no room for trypanosomes capability to survive in any environment given their way of life. With the advancement of gene editing technologies, CRISPR-Cas9 can be used to interrogate Nt-acetylation significance in trypanosomatids, digs into molecular insight, and fills the gaps that are needed for new intervention approaches. This will bring the scientific community closer to assessing Nt-acetylation as a potential new chemotherapeutic agent against trypanosomiasis. Furthermore, a study of Nats in one parasite and its biological significance may be similar in other pathogens; therefore, Nats inhibition may be used to control any organism causing infectious diseases. In addition, divergent fields of human and animal studies, and the concept of addressing many difficult problems facing them, will be brought together under a single theme of “One Health” in both developed and developing worlds. Thus, I may call Nats the “in-heart” possible drug targets to control both poor and wealthy men’s diseases, including animals.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Huge appreciation to Professor Björn Andersson, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, for all support rendered for many years. Many thanks to Associate Professor Lena Åslund, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University for all inputs during the Nt-acetylation study. I appreciate Professor Thomas Arnesen at the University of Bergen, Norway, for his encouragement in the field of N-alpha terminal acetylation. I appreciate all the co-authors for their engagement when we published the Nt-acetylation work. I convey my sincere thanks to Dr. Reginald Austin, affiliated with Gulu University, Uganda, and Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences in Tanzania for all valuable discussions. I thank Professor Johan Bolting, Clinical Pathology, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Sweden for providing moral support. I also thank the pathologists and the staff members working at Clinical Pathology Department, Uppsala Academic Hospital, for all the necessary support. I appreciate Gulu University staff, especially those at the Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Faculty of Agriculture, and Gulu University leadership for providing space for intellectual discussions. I am grateful to my current and previous students for asking many questions about Nt-acetylation, which gave me positive thoughts. To all my friends and colleagues, I am associating with, in the scientific context and on other platforms, I appreciate all your positive contributions in different aspects, which have helped me to put things together. Finally, I thank my family for their valuable support.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Maxfield L, Bermudez R. Trypanosomiasis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 May 20]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535413/
  2. 2. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats. The Causes and Impacts of Neglected Tropical and Zoonotic Diseases: Opportunities for Integrated Intervention Strategies [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011 [cited 2023 May 20]. (The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK62507/
  3. 3. Matthews KR. The developmental cell biology of Trypanosoma brucei. Journal of Cell Science. 2005;118(Pt 2):283-290
  4. 4. Tyler KM, Engman DM. The life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi revisited. International Journal for Parasitology. 2001;31(5-6):472-481
  5. 5. Queiroz AMV, de Oliveira JWF, Moreno CJ, DMA G, Silva MS. VLP-based vaccines as a suitable technology to target Trypanosomatid diseases. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(3):220
  6. 6. De Rycker M, Wyllie S, Horn D, Read KD, Gilbert IH. Anti-trypanosomatid drug discovery: Progress and challenges. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2023;21(1):35-50
  7. 7. Herreros-Cabello A, Callejas-Hernández F, Gironès N, Fresno M. Trypanosoma Cruzi genome: Organization, multi-gene families, transcription, and biological implications. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(10):1196
  8. 8. Jackson AP, Sanders M, Berry A, McQuillan J, Aslett MA, Quail MA, et al. The genome sequence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, causative agent of chronic human african trypanosomiasis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4(4):e658
  9. 9. El-Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Bartholomeu DC, Nilsson D, Aggarwal G, Tran AN, et al. The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Science. 2005;309(5733):409-415
  10. 10. Franzén O, Ochaya S, Sherwood E, Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Miles MA, et al. Shotgun sequencing analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi I Sylvio X10/1 and comparison with T. Cruzi VI CL Brener. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2011;5(3):e984
  11. 11. El-Sayed NM, Hegde P, Quackenbush J, Melville SE, Donelson JE. The African trypanosome genome. International Journal for Parasitology. 2000;30(4):329-345
  12. 12. Horn D. Genome-scale RNAi screens in African trypanosomes. Trends in Parasitology. 2022;38(2):160-173
  13. 13. Horn D. High-throughput decoding of drug targets and drug resistance mechanisms in African trypanosomes. Parasitology. 2014;141(1):77-82
  14. 14. Rivara-Espasandín M, Palumbo MC, Sosa EJ, Radío S, Turjanski AG, Sotelo-Silveira J, et al. Omics data integration facilitates target selection for new antiparasitic drugs against TriTryp infections. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14:1136321
  15. 15. Manivel G, Meyyazhagan A, Durairaj DR, Piramanayagam S. Genome-wide analysis of excretory/secretory proteins in Trypanosoma brucei: Insights into functional characteristics and identification of potential targets by immunoinformatics approach. Genomics. 2019;111(5):1124-1133
  16. 16. Crowther GJ, Shanmugam D, Carmona SJ, Doyle MA, Hertz-Fowler C, Berriman M, et al. Identification of attractive drug targets in neglected-disease pathogens using an in silico approach. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4(8):e804
  17. 17. Pedra-Rezende Y, Bombaça ACS, Menna-Barreto RFS. Is the mitochondrion a promising drug target in trypanosomatids? Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e210379
  18. 18. Ree R, Varland S, Arnesen T. Spotlight on protein N-terminal acetylation. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2018;50(7):1-13
  19. 19. Zuma AA, de Souza W. Histone deacetylases as targets for antitrypanosomal drugs. Future Science OA. 2018;4(8):FSO325
  20. 20. Chen C, Liu J. Histone acetylation modifications: A potential targets for the diagnosis and treatment of papillary thyroid cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022;12:1053618
  21. 21. Saha S. Histone modifications and other facets of epigenetic regulation in Trypanosomatids: Leaving their mark. MBio. 2020;11(5):e01079-e01020
  22. 22. Ropero S, Esteller M. The role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in human cancer. Molecular Oncology. 2007;1(1):19-25
  23. 23. Bondarev AD, Attwood MM, Jonsson J, Chubarev VN, Tarasov VV, Schiöth HB. Recent developments of HDAC inhibitors: Emerging indications and novel molecules. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2021;87(12):4577-4597
  24. 24. Valente S, Mai A. Small-molecule inhibitors of histone deacetylase for the treatment of cancer and non-cancer diseases: A patent review (2011 - 2013). Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents. 2014;24(4):401-415
  25. 25. Van Damme P, Osberg C, Jonckheere V, Glomnes N, Gevaert K, Arnesen T, et al. Expanded in vivo substrate profile of the yeast N-terminal acetyltransferase NatC. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2023;299(2):102824
  26. 26. Aksnes H, Ree R, Arnesen T. Co-translational, post-translational, and non-catalytic roles of N-terminal acetyltransferases. Molecular Cell. 2019;73(6):1097-1114
  27. 27. Deng S, Marmorstein R. Protein N-terminal acetylation: Structural basis, mechanism, versatility, and regulation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2021;46(1):15-27
  28. 28. Gottlieb L, Marmorstein R. Biochemical and structural analysis of N-terminal acetyltransferases. Methods in Enzymology. 2019;626:271-299
  29. 29. Aksnes H, Hole K, Arnesen T. Molecular, cellular, and physiological significance of N-terminal acetylation. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 2015;316:267-305
  30. 30. Kalvik TV, Arnesen T. Protein N-terminal acetyltransferases in cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32(3):269-276
  31. 31. Koufaris C, Kirmizis A. N-terminal acetyltransferases are cancer-essential genes prevalently upregulated in tumours. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2631
  32. 32. Foyn H, Jones JE, Lewallen D, Narawane R, Varhaug JE, Thompson PR, et al. Design, synthesis, and kinetic characterization of protein N-terminal acetyltransferase inhibitors. ACS Chemical Biology. 2013;8(6):1121-1127
  33. 33. Ochaya S, Respuela P, Simonsson M, Saraswathi A, Branche C, Lee J, et al. Characterization of a Trypanosoma cruzi acetyltransferase: Cellular location, activity and structure. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2007;152(2):123-131
  34. 34. Ochaya S, Franzén O, Buhwa DA, Foyn H, Butler CE, Stove SI, et al. Characterization of evolutionarily conserved Trypanosoma cruzi NatC and NatA-N-terminal acetyltransferase complexes. Journal of Parasitology Research. 2019;2019:6594212
  35. 35. Avila CC, Mule SN, Rosa-Fernandes L, Viner R, Barisón MJ, Costa-Martins AG, et al. Proteome-wide analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi exponential and stationary growth phases reveals a subcellular compartment-specific regulation. Genes (Basel). 2018;9(8):413
  36. 36. Ingram AK, Cross GA, Horn D. Genetic manipulation indicates that ARD1 is an essential N(alpha)-acetyltransferase in Trypanosoma brucei. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2000;111(2):309-317
  37. 37. Starheim KK, Gromyko D, Evjenth R, Ryningen A, Varhaug JE, Lillehaug JR, et al. Knockdown of human N alpha-terminal acetyltransferase complex C leads to p53-dependent apoptosis and aberrant human Arl8b localization. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2009;29(13):3569-3581
  38. 38. Shikanai Yasuda MA. Emerging and reemerging forms of Trypanosoma cruzi transmission. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e210033
  39. 39. Stuart K, Brun R, Croft S, Fairlamb A, Gürtler RE, McKerrow J, et al. Kinetoplastids: Related protozoan pathogens, different diseases. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2008;118(4):1301-1310
  40. 40. Brun R, Blum J, Chappuis F, Burri C. Human African trypanosomiasis. Lancet. 2010;375(9709):148-159
  41. 41. Kennedy PGE. Human African trypanosomiasis-neurological aspects. Journal of Neurology. 2006;253(4):411-416
  42. 42. Kasozi KI, Zirintunda G, Ssempijja F, Buyinza B, Alzahrani KJ, Matama K, et al. Epidemiology of Trypanosomiasis in wildlife—Implications for humans at the wildlife Interface in Africa. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021;8:621699
  43. 43. Rassi A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1388-1402
  44. 44. Coura JR. The main sceneries of Chagas disease transmission. The vectors, blood and oral transmissions - a comprehensive review. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110(3):277-282
  45. 45. Liu Q , Zhou XN. Preventing the transmission of American trypanosomiasis and its spread into non-endemic countries. Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2015;4:60
  46. 46. Onyekwelu KC. Life cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi in the invertebrate and the vertebrate hosts. In: Biology of Trypanosoma Cruzi [Internet]. London, UK, London, UK: IntechOpen; 2019 [cited 2023 May 20]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/65773
  47. 47. Cavalcanti DP, de Souza W. The Kinetoplast of Trypanosomatids: From early studies of electron microscopy to recent advances in atomic force microscopy. Scanning. 2018;2018:9603051
  48. 48. Michels PAM, Bringaud F, Herman M, Hannaert V. Metabolic functions of glycosomes in trypanosomatids. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2006;1763(12):1463-1477
  49. 49. Docampo R, Huang G. New insights into the role of acidocalcisomes in trypanosomatids. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2022;69(6):e12899
  50. 50. Zuma AA, Dos Santos BE, de Souza W. Basic biology of Trypanosoma cruzi. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2021;27(14):1671-1732
  51. 51. Halliday C, de Castro-Neto A, Alcantara CL, Cunha-E-Silva NL, Vaughan S, Sunter JD. Trypanosomatid Flagellar pocket from structure to function. Trends in Parasitology. 2021;37(4):317-329
  52. 52. de Souza W, Carreiro IP, Miranda K, Silva NL. Two special organelles found in Trypanosoma cruzi. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2000;72(3):421-432
  53. 53. Krüger T, Hofweber M, Kramer S. SCD6 induces ribonucleoprotein granule formation in trypanosomes in a translation-independent manner, regulated by its Lsm and RGG domains. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2013;24(13):2098-2111
  54. 54. Halliday C, Billington K, Wang Z, Madden R, Dean S, Sunter JD, et al. Cellular landmarks of Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania mexicana. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2019;230:24-36
  55. 55. Docampo R, Vercesi AE. Mitochondrial Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species in Trypanosomatids. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2022;36(13-15):969-983
  56. 56. Rohloff P, Docampo R. A contractile vacuole complex is involved in osmoregulation in Trypanosoma cruzi. Experimental Parasitology. 2008;118(1):17-24
  57. 57. Rodrigues JCF, Godinho JLP, de Souza W. Biology of human pathogenic Trypanosomatids: Epidemiology, lifecycle and ultrastructure. In: ALS S, Branquinha MH, d’Avila-Levy CM, Kneipp LF, Sodré CL, editors. Proteins and Proteomics of Leishmania and Trypanosoma [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. pp. 1-42. [cited 2023 May 20]. (Subcellular Biochemistry). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7305-9_1
  58. 58. Daniels JP, Gull K, Wickstead B. Cell biology of the trypanosome genome. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2010;74(4):552-569
  59. 59. Clayton C. Regulation of gene expression in trypanosomatids: Living with polycistronic transcription. Open Biology. 2019;9(6):190072
  60. 60. Günzl A, Bruderer T, Laufer G, Schimanski B, Tu LC, Chung HM, et al. RNA polymerase I transcribes procyclin genes and variant surface glycoprotein gene expression sites in Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryotic Cell. 2003;2(3):542-551
  61. 61. Horn D, McCulloch R. Molecular mechanisms underlying the control of antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2010;13(6):700-705
  62. 62. Faria J, Briggs EM, Black JA, McCulloch R. Emergence and adaptation of the cellular machinery directing antigenic variation in the African trypanosome. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2022;70:102209
  63. 63. Romaniuk MA, Cervini G, Cassola A. Regulation of RNA binding proteins in trypanosomatid protozoan parasites. World Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2016;7(1):146-157
  64. 64. Kolev NG, Ullu E, Tschudi C. The emerging role of RNA-binding proteins in the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. Cellular Microbiology. 2014;16(4):482-489
  65. 65. Romaniuk MA, Frasch AC, Cassola A. Translational repression by an RNA-binding protein promotes differentiation to infective forms in Trypanosoma cruzi. PLoS Pathogens. 2018;14(6):e1007059
  66. 66. Gómez-Liñán C, Gómez-Díaz E, Ceballos-Pérez G, Fernández-Moya SM, Estévez AM. The RNA-binding protein RBP33 dampens non-productive transcription in trypanosomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;50(21):12251-12265
  67. 67. Romagnoli BAA, Holetz FB, Alves LR, Goldenberg S. RNA binding proteins and gene expression regulation in Trypanosoma cruzi. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology [Internet]. 2020;10:1-17 [cited 2023 May 20]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00056
  68. 68. Tshitenge TB, Liu B, Clayton C. The RNA-binding protein DRBD18 regulates processing and export of the mRNA encoding Trypanosoma brucei RNA-binding protein 10 [internet]. bioRxiv. 2021:1-33. [cited 2023 May 20]. DOI: 10.1101/2021.09.13.460056
  69. 69. Obado SO, Rout MP, Field MC. Sending the message: Specialized RNA export mechanisms in trypanosomes. Trends in Parasitology. 2022;38(10):854-867
  70. 70. Christiano R, Kolev NG, Shi H, Ullu E, Walther TC, Tschudi C. The proteome and transcriptome of the infectious metacyclic form of Trypanosoma brucei define quiescent cells primed for mammalian invasion. Molecular Microbiology. 2017;106(1):74-92
  71. 71. Smircich P, Pérez-Díaz L, Hernández F, Duhagon MA, Garat B. Transcriptomic analysis of the adaptation to prolonged starvation of the insect-dwelling Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2023;13:1138456
  72. 72. Chávez S, Eastman G, Smircich P, Becco LL, Oliveira-Rizzo C, Fort R, et al. Transcriptome-wide analysis of the Trypanosoma cruzi proliferative cycle identifies the periodically expressed mRNAs and their multiple levels of control. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188441
  73. 73. Sabalette KB, Sotelo-Silveira JR, Smircich P, Gaudenzi JGD. RNA-Seq reveals that overexpression of TcUBP1 switches the gene expression pattern toward that of the infective form of Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal of Biological Chemistry [Internet]. 2023;299(5):1-15 [cited 2023 May 20]. Available from: https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(23)00265-X/abstract
  74. 74. García-Huertas P, Cuesta-Astroz Y, Araque-Ruiz V, Cardona-Castro N. Transcriptional changes during metacyclogenesis of a Colombian Trypanosoma cruzi strain. Parasitology Research. 2023;122(2):625-634
  75. 75. Briggs EM, Rojas F, McCulloch R, Matthews KR, Otto TD. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei reconstructs cell cycle progression and developmental quorum sensing. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):5268
  76. 76. Kruse E, Göringer HU. Nanopore-based direct RNA sequencing of the Trypanosoma brucei transcriptome identifies novel lncRNAs. Genes. 2023;14(3):610
  77. 77. Maree JP, Tvardovskiy A, Ravnsborg T, Jensen ON, Rudenko G, Patterton HG. Trypanosoma brucei histones are heavily modified with combinatorial post-translational modifications and mark pol II transcription start regions with hyperacetylated H2A. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;50(17):9705-9723
  78. 78. Desale H, Buekens P, Alger J, Cafferata ML, Harville EW, Herrera C, et al. Epigenetic signature of exposure to maternal Trypanosoma cruzi infection in cord blood cells from uninfected newborns. Epigenomics. 2022;14(15):913-927
  79. 79. Staneva DP, Carloni R, Auchynnikava T, Tong P, Rappsilber J, Jeyaprakash AA, et al. A systematic analysis of Trypanosoma brucei chromatin factors identifies novel protein interaction networks associated with sites of transcription initiation and termination. Genome Research. 2021;31(11):2138-2154
  80. 80. Lucky AB, Wang C, Li X, Chim-Ong A, Adapa SR, Quinlivan EP, et al. Characterization of the dual role of plasmodium falciparum DNA methyltransferase in regulating transcription and translation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2023;51(8):3918-3933
  81. 81. Horn D. Introducing histone modification in trypanosomes. Trends in Parasitology. 2007;23(6):239-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2007.03.009
  82. 82. Brisse S, Barnabé C, Tibayrenc M. Identification of six Trypanosoma cruzi phylogenetic lineages by random amplified polymorphic DNA and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. International Journal for Parasitology. 2000;30(1):35-44
  83. 83. Zingales B, Bartholomeu DC. Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity: Impact on transmission cycles and Chagas disease. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e210193
  84. 84. Miles MA, Souza A, Povoa M, Shaw JJ, Lainson R, Toye PJ. Isozymic heterogeneity of Trypanosoma cruzi in the first autochthonous patients with Chagas’ disease in Amazonian Brazil. Nature. 1978;272(5656):819-821
  85. 85. Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Yeo M, Acosta N, Gaunt MW, Miles MA. Recent, independent and anthropogenic origins of Trypanosoma cruzi hybrids. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2011;5(10):e1363
  86. 86. Matos GM, Lewis MD, Talavera-López C, Yeo M, Grisard EC, Messenger LA, et al. Microevolution of Trypanosoma cruzi reveals hybridization and clonal mechanisms driving rapid genome diversification. eLife. 2022;11:e75237
  87. 87. Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, Tibayrenc M, Macedo AM, Teixeira MMG, et al. The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: Rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2012;12(2):240-253
  88. 88. Macedo AM, Machado CR, Oliveira RP, Pena SDJ. Trypanosoma cruzi: Genetic structure of populations and relevance of genetic variability to the pathogenesis of chagas disease. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2004;99(1):1-12
  89. 89. Souza TKM de, Westphalen EVN, da Westphalen SR, Taniguchi HH, Elias CR, Motoie G, et al. Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi strains isolated from chronic chagasic patients and non-human hosts in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e220125.
  90. 90. Zingales B, Stolf BS, Souto RP, Fernandes O, Briones MR. Epidemiology, biochemistry and evolution of Trypanosoma cruzi lineages based on ribosomal RNA sequences. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 1999;94(Suppl. 1):159-164
  91. 91. Cura CI, Mejía-Jaramillo AM, Duffy T, Burgos JM, Rodriguero M, Cardinal MV, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi I genotypes in different geographical regions and transmission cycles based on a microsatellite motif of the intergenic spacer of spliced-leader genes. International Journal for Parasitology. 2010;40(14):1599-1607
  92. 92. Velásquez-Ortiz N, Herrera G, Hernández C, Muñoz M, Ramírez JD. Discrete typing units of Trypanosoma cruzi: Geographical and biological distribution in the Americas. Scientific Data. 2022;9(1):360
  93. 93. Echodu R, Sistrom M, Bateta R, Murilla G, Okedi L, Aksoy S, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of Trypanosoma brucei in Uganda: Implications for the epidemiology of sleeping sickness and nagana. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9(2):e0003353
  94. 94. Kato CD, Alibu VP, Nanteza A, Mugasa CM, Matovu E. Population genetic structure and temporal stability among Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense isolates in Uganda. Parasites & Vectors. 2016;9:259
  95. 95. Bingle LE, Eastlake JL, Bailey M, Gibson WC. A novel GFP approach for the analysis of genetic exchange in trypanosomes allowing the in situ detection of mating events. Microbiology (Reading). 2001;147(Pt 12):3231-3240
  96. 96. Kay C, Peacock L, Williams TA, Gibson W. Signatures of hybridization in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathogens. 2022;18(2):e1010300
  97. 97. Dean S. Basic biology of Trypanosoma brucei with reference to the development of chemotherapies. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2021;27(14):1650-1670
  98. 98. de la Pech-Canul ÁC, Monteón V, Solís-Oviedo RL. A brief view of the surface membrane proteins from Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal of Parasitology Research. 2017;2017:3751403
  99. 99. Frasch ACC. Functional diversity in the trans-sialidase and mucin families in Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasitology Today. 2000;16(7):282-286
  100. 100. Buscaglia CA, Campo VA, Frasch ACC, Di Noia JM. Trypanosoma cruzi surface mucins: Host-dependent coat diversity. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2006;4(3):229-236
  101. 101. De Pablos LM, Osuna A. Multigene families in Trypanosoma cruzi and their role in infectivity. Infection and Immunity. 2012;80(7):2258-2264
  102. 102. Bartholomeu DC, Cerqueira GC, Leão ACA, daRocha WD, Pais FS, Macedo C, et al. Genomic organization and expression profile of the mucin-associated surface protein (masp) family of the human pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi. Nucleic Acids Research. 2009;37(10):3407-3417
  103. 103. Callejas-Hernández F, Rastrojo A, Poveda C, Gironès N, Fresno M. Genomic assemblies of newly sequenced Trypanosoma cruzi strains reveal new genomic expansion and greater complexity. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):14631
  104. 104. Atwood JA, Weatherly DB, Minning TA, Bundy B, Cavola C, Opperdoes FR, et al. The Trypanosoma cruzi proteome. Science. 2005;309(5733):473-476
  105. 105. Leão AC, Viana LA, Fortes de Araujo F, de Lourdes AR, Freitas LM, Coqueiro-Dos-Santos A, et al. Antigenic diversity of MASP gene family of Trypanosoma cruzi. Microbes and Infection. 2022;24(6-7):104982
  106. 106. Espinoza B, Martínez I, Martínez-Velasco ML, Rodríguez-Sosa M, González-Canto A, Vázquez-Mendoza A, et al. Role of a 49 kDa Trypanosoma cruzi mucin-associated surface protein (MASP49) during the infection process and identification of a mammalian cell surface receptor. Pathogens. 2023;12(1):105
  107. 107. Rebello KM, Uehara LA, Ennes-Vidal V, Garcia-Gomes AS, Britto C, Azambuja P, et al. Participation of Trypanosoma cruzi gp63 molecules on the interaction with Rhodnius prolixus. Parasitology. 2019;146(8):1075-1082
  108. 108. Kulkarni MM, Olson CL, Engman DM, McGwire BS. Trypanosoma cruzi GP63 proteins undergo stage-specific differential posttranslational modification and are important for host cell infection. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77(5):2193-2200
  109. 109. Llewellyn MS, Messenger LA, Luquetti AO, Garcia L, Torrico F, Tavares SBN, et al. Deep sequencing of the Trypanosoma cruzi GP63 surface proteases reveals diversity and diversifying selection among chronic and congenital Chagas disease patients. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2015;9(4):e0003458
  110. 110. Cuevas IC, Cazzulo JJ, Sánchez DO. gp63 homologues in Trypanosoma cruzi: Surface antigens with metalloprotease activity and a possible role in host cell infection. Infection and Immunity. 2003;71(10):5739-5749
  111. 111. Kangussu-Marcolino MM, de Paiva RMC, Araújo PR, de Mendonça-Neto RP, Lemos L, Bartholomeu DC, et al. Distinct genomic organization, mRNA expression and cellular localization of members of two amastin sub-families present in Trypanosoma cruzi. BMC Microbiology. 2013;13:10
  112. 112. Cruz MC, Souza-Melo N, da Silva CV, Darocha WD, Bahia D, Araújo PR, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi: Role of δ-amastin on extracellular amastigote cell invasion and differentiation. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51804
  113. 113. García EA, Ziliani M, Agüero F, Bernabó G, Sánchez DO, Tekiel V. TcTASV: A novel protein family in Trypanosoma cruzi identified from a subtractive Trypomastigote cDNA library. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4(10):e841
  114. 114. Caeiro LD, Alba-Soto CD, Rizzi M, Solana ME, Rodriguez G, Chidichimo AM, et al. The protein family TcTASV-C is a novel Trypanosoma cruzi virulence factor secreted in extracellular vesicles by trypomastigotes and highly expressed in bloodstream forms. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2018;12(5):e0006475
  115. 115. Souto-Padron T, Campetella OE, Cazzulo JJ, de Souza W. Cysteine proteinase in Trypanosoma cruzi: Immunocytochemical localization and involvement in parasite-host cell interaction. Journal of Cell Science. 1990;96(3):485-490
  116. 116. Santos VC, Oliveira AER, Campos ACB, Reis-Cunha JL, Bartholomeu DC, Teixeira SMR, et al. The gene repertoire of the main cysteine protease of Trypanosoma cruzi, cruzipain, reveals four sub-types with distinct active sites. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):18231
  117. 117. Cerny N, Bivona AE, Sanchez Alberti A, Trinitario SN, Morales C, Cardoso Landaburu A, et al. Cruzipain and its physiological inhibitor, Chagasin, as a DNA-based therapeutic vaccine against Trypanosoma cruzi. Frontiers in Immunology [Internet]. 2020;11:1-15 [cited 2023 May 21]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.565142
  118. 118. San Francisco J, Astudillo C, Vega JL, Catalán A, Gutiérrez B, Araya JE, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi pathogenicity involves virulence factor expression and upregulation of bioenergetic and biosynthetic pathways. Virulence. 2022;13(1):1827-1848
  119. 119. Reis-Cunha JL, Valdivia HO, Bartholomeu DC. Gene and Chromosomal copy number variations as an adaptive mechanism towards a parasitic lifestyle in Trypanosomatids. Current Genomics. 2018;19(2):87-97
  120. 120. McCulloch R, Morrison LJ, Hall JPJ. DNA recombination strategies during antigenic variation in the African trypanosome. Microbiology. Spectrum. 2015;3(2):3.2.03
  121. 121. Ruepp S, Furger A, Kurath U, Renggli CK, Hemphill A, Brun R, et al. Survival of Trypanosoma brucei in the tsetse Fly is enhanced by the expression of specific forms of Procyclin. Journal of Cell Biology. 1997;137(6):1369-1379
  122. 122. El-Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Blandin G, Berriman M, Crabtree J, Aggarwal G, et al. Comparative genomics of Trypanosomatid parasitic protozoa. Science. 2005;309(5733):404-409
  123. 123. Shanmugasundram A, Starns D, Böhme U, Amos B, Wilkinson PA, Harb OS, et al. TriTrypDB: An integrated functional genomics resource for kinetoplastida. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2023;17(1):e0011058
  124. 124. Duncan R. DNA microarray analysis of protozoan parasite gene expression: Outcomes correlate with mechanisms of regulation. Trends in Parasitology. 2004;20(5):211-215
  125. 125. Cuervo P, Domont GB, De Jesus JB. Proteomics of trypanosomatids of human medical importance. Journal of Proteomics. 2010;73(5):845-867
  126. 126. Parthasarathy A, Kalesh K. Defeating the trypanosomatid trio: Proteomics of the protozoan parasites causing neglected tropical diseases. RSC Medicinal Chemistry. 2020;11(6):625-645
  127. 127. Marchini FK, de Godoy LMF, Batista M, Kugeratski FG, Krieger MA. Towards the phosphoproteome of trypanosomatids. Sub-Cellular Biochemistry. 2014;74:351-378
  128. 128. Alves MJM, Kawahara R, Viner R, Colli W, Mattos EC, Thaysen-Andersen M, et al. Comprehensive glycoprofiling of the epimastigote and trypomastigote stages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Journal of Proteomics. 2017;151:182-192
  129. 129. Picchi GFA, Zulkievicz V, Krieger MA, Zanchin NT, Goldenberg S, de Godoy LMF. Post-translational modifications of Trypanosoma cruzi canonical and variant histones. Journal of Proteome Research. 2017;16(3):1167-1179
  130. 130. Lott K, Li J, Fisk JC, Wang H, Aletta JM, Qu J, et al. Global proteomic analysis in trypanosomes reveals unique proteins and conserved cellular processes impacted by arginine methylation. Journal of Proteomics. 2013;91:210-225
  131. 131. Magez S, Li Z, Nguyen HTT, Pinto Torres JE, Van Wielendaele P, Radwanska M, et al. The history of anti-trypanosome vaccine development shows that highly immunogenic and exposed pathogen-derived antigens are not necessarily good target candidates: Enolase and ISG75 as examples. Pathogens. 2021;10(8):1050
  132. 132. Zhang WW, Karmakar S, Gannavaram S, Dey R, Lypaczewski P, Ismail N, et al. A second generation leishmanization vaccine with a markerless attenuated Leishmania major strain using CRISPR gene editing. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):3461
  133. 133. Franco JR, Cecchi G, Paone M, Diarra A, Grout L, Kadima Ebeja A, et al. The elimination of human African trypanosomiasis: Achievements in relation to WHO road map targets for 2020. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2022;16(1):e0010047
  134. 134. de Arias AR, Monroy C, Guhl F, Sosa-Estani S, Santos WS, Abad-Franch F. Chagas disease control-surveillance in the Americas: The multinational initiatives and the practical impossibility of interrupting vector-borne Trypanosoma cruzi transmission. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e210130
  135. 135. Pérez-Molina JA, Crespillo-Andújar C, Bosch-Nicolau P, Molina I. Trypanocidal treatment of Chagas disease. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (English ed.). 2021;39(9):458-470
  136. 136. Sosa Estani S, Segura EL, Ruiz AM, Velazquez E, Porcel BM, Yampotis C. Efficacy of chemotherapy with benznidazole in children in the indeterminate phase of Chagas’ disease. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 1998;59(4):526-529
  137. 137. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy: An update of current clinical knowledge and management: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138(12):e169-e209
  138. 138. Campbell S, Soman-Faulkner K. Antiparasitic Drugs. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 May 21]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544251/
  139. 139. Venturelli A, Tagliazucchi L, Lima C, Venuti F, Malpezzi G, Magoulas GE, et al. Current treatments to control African Trypanosomiasis and one health perspective. Microorganisms. 2022;10(7):1298
  140. 140. Burri C. Chemotherapy against human African trypanosomiasis: Is there a road to success? Parasitology. 2010;137(14):1987-1994
  141. 141. Robays J, Nyamowala G, Sese C, Mesu BK, Kande V, Lutumba P, et al. High failure rates of melarsoprol for sleeping sickness, Democratic Republic of Congo. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2008;14(6):966-967
  142. 142. Piñeyro MD, Arias D, Parodi-Talice A, Guerrero S, Robello C. Trypanothione metabolism as drug target for Trypanosomatids. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2021;27(15):1834-1846
  143. 143. Aguilera E, Sánchez C, Cruces ME, Dávila B, Minini L, Mosquillo F, et al. Preclinical studies and drug combination of low-cost molecules for Chagas disease. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;16(1):20
  144. 144. Barnadas-Carceller B, Martinez-Peinado N, Gómez LC, Ros-Lucas A, Gabaldón-Figueira JC, Diaz-Mochon JJ, et al. Identification of compounds with activity against Trypanosoma cruzi within a collection of synthetic nucleoside analogs. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2022;12:1067461
  145. 145. Trevisan RO, Santos MM, Desidério CS, Alves LG, de Jesus ST, de Castro OL, et al. In Silico identification of new targets for diagnosis, vaccine, and drug candidates against Trypanosoma cruzi. Disease Markers. 2020;2020:9130719
  146. 146. Kouzarides T. Acetylation: A regulatory modification to rival phosphorylation? The EMBO Journal. 2000;19(6):1176-1179
  147. 147. Polevoda B, Sherman F. N-terminal acetyltransferases and sequence requirements for N-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2003;325(4):595-622
  148. 148. Starheim KK, Gevaert K, Arnesen T. Protein N-terminal acetyltransferases: When the start matters. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2012;37(4):152-161
  149. 149. Falb M, Aivaliotis M, Garcia-Rizo C, Bisle B, Tebbe A, Klein C, et al. Archaeal N-terminal protein maturation commonly involves N-terminal acetylation: A large-scale proteomics survey. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2006;362(5):915-924
  150. 150. Van Damme P, Hole K, Pimenta-Marques A, Helsens K, Vandekerckhove J, Martinho RG, et al. NatF contributes to an evolutionary shift in protein N-terminal acetylation and is important for normal chromosome segregation. PLoS Genetics. 2011;7(7):e1002169
  151. 151. Arnesen T, Van Damme P, Polevoda B, Helsens K, Evjenth R, Colaert N, et al. Proteomics analyses reveal the evolutionary conservation and divergence of N-terminal acetyltransferases from yeast and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(20):8157-8162
  152. 152. Parks AR, Escalante-Semerena JC. Protein N-terminal acylation: An emerging field in bacterial cell physiology. Current Trends Microbiology. 2022;16:1-18
  153. 153. Collars OA, Jones BS, Hu DD, Weaver SD, Champion MM, Champion PA. An N-acetyltransferase required for EsxA N-terminal protein acetylation and virulence in Mycobacterium marinum. ASM Journals. 2023;14(5):1-17
  154. 154. Starheim KK, Gromyko D, Velde R, Varhaug JE, Arnesen T. Composition and biological significance of the human Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferases. BMC Proceedings. 2009;3 Suppl 6(Suppl. 6):S3
  155. 155. Hole K, Van Damme P, Dalva M, Aksnes H, Glomnes N, Varhaug JE, et al. The human N-alpha-acetyltransferase 40 (hNaa40p/hNatD) is conserved from yeast and N-terminally acetylates histones H2A and H4. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24713
  156. 156. Dinh TV, Bienvenut WV, Linster E, Feldman-Salit A, Jung VA, Meinnel T, et al. Molecular identification and functional characterization of the first Nα-acetyltransferase in plastids by global acetylome profiling. Proteomics. 2015;15(14):2426-2435
  157. 157. Drazic A, Aksnes H, Marie M, Boczkowska M, Varland S, Timmerman E, et al. NAA80 is actin’s N-terminal acetyltransferase and regulates cytoskeleton assembly and cell motility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2018;115(17):4399-4404
  158. 158. Van Damme P, Kalvik TV, Starheim KK, Jonckheere V, Myklebust LM, Menschaert G, et al. A role for human N-alpha acetyltransferase 30 (Naa30) in maintaining mitochondrial integrity. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2016;15(11):3361-3372
  159. 159. Starheim KK, Arnesen T, Gromyko D, Ryningen A, Varhaug JE, Lillehaug JR. Identification of the human N(alpha)-acetyltransferase complex B (hNatB): A complex important for cell-cycle progression. The Biochemical Journal. 2008;415(2):325-331
  160. 160. Aksnes H, Drazic A, Marie M, Arnesen T. First things first: Vital protein Marks by N-terminal acetyltransferases. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2016;41(9):746-760
  161. 161. Pożoga M, Armbruster L, Wirtz M. From nucleus to membrane: A subcellular map of the N-acetylation machinery in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(22):14492
  162. 162. Dörfel MJ, Lyon GJ. The biological functions of Naa10 — From amino-terminal acetylation to human disease. Gene. 2015;567(2):103-131
  163. 163. Shin DH, Chun YS, Lee KH, Shin HW, Park JW. Arrest Defective-1 controls tumor cell behavior by acetylating myosin light chain kinase. PLoS One. 2009;4(10):e7451
  164. 164. Friedrich UA, Zedan M, Hessling B, Fenzl K, Gillet L, Barry J, et al. Nα-terminal acetylation of proteins by NatA and NatB serves distinct physiological roles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Reports. 2021;34(5):108711
  165. 165. Lee MN, Kweon HY, Oh GT. N-α-acetyltransferase 10 (NAA10) in development: The role of NAA10. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2018;50(7):1-11
  166. 166. Kim SM, Ha E, Kim J, Cho C, Shin SJ, Seo JH. NAA10 as a new prognostic marker for cancer progression. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(21):8010
  167. 167. Polevoda B, Cardillo TS, Doyle TC, Bedi GS, Sherman F. Nat3p and Mdm20p are required for function of yeast NatB Nalpha-terminal acetyltransferase and of actin and tropomyosin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(33):30686-30697
  168. 168. Jung TY, Ryu JE, Jang MM, Lee SY, Jin GR, Kim CW, et al. Naa20, the catalytic subunit of NatB complex, contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating the LKB1-AMPK-mTOR axis. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2020;52(11):1831-1844
  169. 169. Neri L, Lasa M, Elosegui-Artola A, D’Avola D, Carte B, Gazquez C, et al. NatB-mediated protein N-α-terminal acetylation is a potential therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(25):40967-40981
  170. 170. Polevoda B, Sherman F. Composition and function of the eukaryotic N-terminal acetyltransferase subunits. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2003;308(1):1-11
  171. 171. Gupta CM, Ambaru B, Bajaj R. Emerging functions of actins and actin binding proteins in Trypanosomatids. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology. 2020;8:587685
  172. 172. Oishi K, Yamayoshi S, Kozuka-Hata H, Oyama M, Kawaoka Y. N-terminal acetylation by NatB is required for the shutoff activity of influenza a virus PA-X. Cell Reports. 2018;24(4):851-860
  173. 173. Das A, Banday M, Bellofatto V. RNA polymerase transcription machinery in trypanosomes. Eukaryotic Cell. 2008;7(3):429-434
  174. 174. Huber M, Bienvenut WV, Linster E, Stephan I, Armbruster L, Sticht C, et al. NatB-mediated N-terminal acetylation affects growth and biotic stress Responses1. Plant Physiology. 2020;182(2):792-806
  175. 175. Mesías AC, Garg NJ, Zago MP. Redox balance keepers and possible cell functions managed by redox homeostasis in Trypanosoma cruzi. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology [Internet]. 2019;9:1-20 [cited 2023 May 22]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00435
  176. 176. Ramakrishnan S, Docampo R. Membrane proteins in Trypanosomatids involved in Ca2+ homeostasis and Signaling. Genes (Basel). 2018;9(6):304
  177. 177. Michels PAM, Gualdrón-López M. Biogenesis and metabolic homeostasis of trypanosomatid glycosomes: New insights and new questions. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2022;69(6):e12897
  178. 178. Grunwald S, Hopf LVM, Bock-Bierbaum T, Lally CCM, Spahn CMT, Daumke O. Divergent architecture of the heterotrimeric NatC complex explains N-terminal acetylation of cognate substrates. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):5506
  179. 179. Pesaresi P, Gardner NA, Masiero S, Dietzmann A, Eichacker L, Wickner R, et al. Cytoplasmic N-terminal protein acetylation is required for efficient photosynthesis in Arabidopsis[W]. The Plant Cell. 2003;15(8):1817-1832
  180. 180. Song O, kyu, Wang X, Waterborg JH, Sternglanz R. An Nalpha-acetyltransferase responsible for acetylation of the N-terminal residues of histones H4 and H2A. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003;278(40):38109-38112
  181. 181. Constantinou M, Klavaris A, Koufaris C, Kirmizis A. Cellular effects of NAT-mediated histone N-terminal acetylation. Journal of Cell Science. 2023;136(7):jcs260801
  182. 182. Arnesen T, Anderson D, Baldersheim C, Lanotte M, Varhaug JE, Lillehaug JR. Identification and characterization of the human ARD1–NATH protein acetyltransferase complex. The Biochemical Journal. 2005;386(Pt 3):433-443
  183. 183. Deng S, Magin RS, Wei X, Pan B, Petersson EJ, Marmorstein R. Structure and mechanism of acetylation by the N-terminal dual enzyme NatA/Naa50 complex. Structure. 2019;27(7):1057-1070.e4
  184. 184. Deng S, McTiernan N, Wei X, Arnesen T, Marmorstein R. Molecular basis for N-terminal acetylation by human NatE and its modulation by HYPK. Nature Communications. 2020;11:818
  185. 185. Fang T, Wang D, Li R, Yu W, Tian H. Pan-cancer analysis reveals NAA50 as a cancer prognosis and immune infiltration-related biomarker. Frontiers in Genetics. 2022;13:1035337
  186. 186. Feng J, Hu J, Li Y, Li R, Yu H, Ma L. The N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa50 regulates Arabidopsis growth and osmotic stress response. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2020;61(9):1565-1575
  187. 187. Armbruster L, Linster E, Boyer JB, Brünje A, Eirich J, Stephan I, et al. NAA50 is an enzymatically active N α-acetyltransferase that is crucial for development and regulation of stress responses. Plant Physiology. 2020;183(4):1502-1516
  188. 188. Aksnes H, Van Damme P, Goris M, Starheim KK, Marie M, Støve SI, et al. An organellar nα-acetyltransferase, naa60, acetylates cytosolic N termini of transmembrane proteins and maintains Golgi integrity. Cell Reports. 2015;10(8):1362-1374
  189. 189. Aksnes H, Goris M, Strømland Ø, Drazic A, Waheed Q , Reuter N, et al. Molecular determinants of the N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa60 anchoring to the Golgi membrane. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2017;292(16):6821-6837
  190. 190. Donnarumma F, Tucci V, Ambrosino C, Altucci L, Carafa V. NAA60 (HAT4): The newly discovered bi-functional Golgi member of the acetyltransferase family. Clinical Epigenetics. 2022;14(1):182
  191. 191. de Lima LP, Poubel SB, Yuan ZF, Rosón JN, de Vitorino FNL, Holetz FB, et al. Improvements on the quantitative analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi histone post translational modifications: Study of changes in epigenetic marks through the parasite’s metacyclogenesis and life cycle. Journal of Proteomics. 2020;225:103847
  192. 192. Wiame E, Tahay G, Tyteca D, Vertommen D, Stroobant V, Bommer GT, et al. NAT6 acetylates the N-terminus of different forms of actin. The FEBS Journal. 2018;285(17):3299-3316
  193. 193. Arnesen T, Marmorstein R, Dominguez R. Actin’s N-terminal acetyltransferase uncovered. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2018;75(7):318-322
  194. 194. Beigl TB, Hellesvik M, Saraste J, Arnesen T, Aksnes H. N-terminal acetylation of actin by NAA80 is essential for structural integrity of the Golgi apparatus. Experimental Cell Research. 2020;390(2):111961
  195. 195. Polino AJ, Hasan MM, Floyd K, Avila-Cruz Y, Yang Y, Goldberg DE. An essential endoplasmic reticulum-resident N-acetyltransferase ortholog in plasmodium falciparum. Journal of Cell Science. 2023;136(6):jcs260551
  196. 196. Nyonda MA, Boyer JB, Belmudes L, Krishnan A, Pino P, Couté Y, et al. N-acetylation of secreted proteins in Apicomplexa is widespread and is independent of the ER acetyl-CoA transporter AT1. Journal of Cell Science. 2022;135(15):jcs259811
  197. 197. Sanchiz Á, Morato E, Rastrojo A, Camacho E, González-de la Fuente S, Marina A, et al. The experimental proteome of Leishmania infantum promastigote and its usefulness for improving gene annotations. Genes. 2020;11(9):1036
  198. 198. Maran SR, Fleck K, Monteiro-Teles NM, Isebe T, Walrad P, Jeffers V, et al. Protein acetylation in the critical biological processes in protozoan parasites. Trends in Parasitology. 2021;37(9):815-830
  199. 199. Drazic A, Myklebust LM, Ree R, Arnesen T. The world of protein acetylation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. 2016;1864(10):1372-1401
  200. 200. Bryant JM, Baumgarten S, Glover L, Hutchinson S, Rachidi N. CRISPR in parasitology: Not exactly cut and dried! Trends in Parasitology. 2019;35(6):409-422
  201. 201. Nishi T, Shinzawa N, Yuda M, Iwanaga S. Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system in plasmodium falciparum using Cas9-expressing parasites and a linear donor template. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):18501
  202. 202. Lander N, Chiurillo MA. State-of-the-art CRISPR/Cas9 Technology for Genome Editing in Trypanosomatids. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2019;66(6):981-991
  203. 203. Lander N, Chiurillo MA, Docampo R. Genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in Trypanosoma cruzi. In: Gómez KA, Buscaglia CA, editors. T Cruzi Infection: Methods and Protocols [Internet]. New York, NY: Springer; 2019. pp. 61-76. [cited 2023 May 23] (Methods in Molecular Biology). DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9148-8_5
  204. 204. Kovářová J, Novotná M, Faria J, Rico E, Wallace C, Zoltner M, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based precision tagging of essential genes in bloodstream form African trypanosomes. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2022;249:111476
  205. 205. Arnesen T. Towards a functional understanding of protein N-terminal acetylation. PLoS Biology. 2011;9(5):e1001074

Written By

Stephen Ochaya

Reviewed: 17 October 2023 Published: 30 November 2023