Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Behind the Scenes: The Realities of Stress in Public Service Jobs

Written By

Abrar Alkhudhayr and Qasem Aljabr

Submitted: 14 June 2024 Reviewed: 17 June 2024 Published: 07 August 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1006279

Burned Out - Exploring the Causes, Consequences, and Solutions of Workplace Stress in Public Service Organizations IntechOpen
Burned Out - Exploring the Causes, Consequences, and Solutions of... Edited by Leonard Bright

From the Edited Volume

Burned Out - Exploring the Causes, Consequences, and Solutions of Workplace Stress in Public Service Organizations [Working Title]

Prof. Leonard Bright

Chapter metrics overview

16 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Imagine feeling constantly overwhelmed, underappreciated, and drained. This is the harsh reality for many individuals working in public service – the incredible individuals who uphold our communities. We all recognize them – the teachers, doctors, firefighters, and any social workers – they pour their hearts into their work, but the pressures of the job are pushing them to their limits. The project, named “Burned Out,” delves into the reasons behind why these individuals are experiencing such extreme burnout. We will explore the root causes of this stress, for example, heavy workloads, limited resources, or feeling like they have no control. However, the impact of burnout extends beyond just the individuals themselves; it negatively affects everyone. Exhausted employees are unable to perform at their best, resulting in a decline in the quality of the services we depend on. “Burned Out” does not just point out the problem; it offers solutions. We will explore ways public servants can manage stress and maintain a supportive environment and healthy work-life balance.

Keywords

  • burnout
  • workplace stress
  • public servants
  • work-life balance
  • quality of the service

1. Introduction

Burnout, the term first introduced in the 1970s by psychologist Herbert Freudenberger, describes a state of extreme physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion due to prolonged stress. Burnout has become a significant issue in today’s fast-paced world as the pressures of work, family, and social obligations intensify. Many individuals experience profound fatigue, cynicism, and a marked decline in productivity. The repercussions of burnout extend beyond the individual, profoundly impacting workplaces, communities, and society at large. This chapter delves into the diverse causes, extensive consequences, and viable solutions for burnout, promoting healthier, more sustainable lifestyles.

Burnout is not merely an overworked feeling; it is a complex syndrome defined by three main components: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal achievement. Emotional exhaustion leaves individuals feeling depleted and unable to cope with daily tasks. Depersonalization leads to a detached and indifferent attitude toward work and interactions with others, creating a sense of alienation. Lastly, a reduced sense of personal achievement results in feelings of incompetence and a lack of productivity. Understanding these components is essential for comprehending the multifaceted nature of burnout and addressing it effectively.

The causes of burnout are multifactorial, involving both organizational and personal elements. Organizational factors such as excessive workload, lack of control, insufficient rewards, poor community relationships, lack of fairness, and value conflicts significantly contribute to burnout. Excessive workload and long working hours are the primary drivers, while the lack of control over work processes and outcomes exacerbates feelings of helplessness. Insufficient rewards, whether in compensation, recognition, or advancement opportunities, can diminish motivation and satisfaction. Poor relationships with colleagues and supervisors lead to isolation and conflict, while perceived unfairness and value conflicts erode trust and engagement. On a personal level, traits such as perfectionism, neglect of self-care, and ineffective coping strategies can trigger and exacerbate burnout. The interplay between these organizational and personal factors fosters chronic stress, eventually leading to burnout.

The consequences of burnout are severe and far-reaching. For individuals, burnout can result in serious health issues such as depression, anxiety, cardiovascular problems, and a weakened immune system. The chronic stress associated with burnout can trigger or exacerbate mental health disorders, contributing to a cycle of declining well-being and productivity. Physical health can also deteriorate, with increased risks of hypertension, heart disease, and other stress-related illnesses. In the workplace, burnout leads to reduced productivity, increased absenteeism, and higher turnover rates, negatively impacting organizational efficiency and morale. The diminished performance and frequent absences of burned-out employees disrupt workflows and burden the remaining staff. High turnover rates result in additional costs related to recruitment, training, and lost institutional knowledge. On a broader scale, burnout incurs economic costs and burdens healthcare systems, underscoring the need for comprehensive solutions. The societal impact of burnout includes decreased economic productivity, increased healthcare expenditures, and a general decline in community well-being.

Addressing burnout requires a holistic approach that includes both preventive measures and interventions. Preventive strategies involve promoting work-life balance, creating supportive work environments, and encouraging self-care. Organizations can implement flexible work schedules, provide resources for stress management, and foster a culture of recognition and support. Creating supportive work environments includes enhancing team cohesion, improving communication, and ensuring fairness in policies and practices. Encouraging self-care involves educating employees about the importance of physical health, mental well-being, and effective coping strategies. Interventions may include organizational changes to reduce workloads, increase job control, and provide necessary support and resources. For example, reallocating tasks, providing training and development opportunities, and offering mental health resources can alleviate some of the pressures contributing to burnout. For individuals, developing resilience through stress management techniques, seeking professional assistance, and building strong support networks are crucial in mitigating burnout’s effects. Techniques such as mindfulness, cognitive-behavioral strategies, and regular physical activity can enhance resilience. Professional assistance from counselors or psychologists can provide targeted interventions, while strong personal and professional support networks offer essential emotional and practical support.

Certain professions are particularly prone to high burnout rates due to their inherent stress levels, long hours, and demanding responsibilities. These include healthcare professionals, teachers, and educators, social workers, law enforcement and first responders, corporate jobs, customer service representatives, retail workers, tech industry workers, journalists, and military personnel. Each profession faces unique challenges that contribute to significant stress and burnout.

Healthcare professionals, including physicians, surgeons, nurses, and emergency medical technicians (EMTs), face intense pressures from long hours, high responsibilities, and emotional strain. Teachers and educators manage large class sizes, administrative pressure, and emotional demands, while social workers handle challenging cases involving vulnerable populations. Law enforcement officers and first responders operate in high-risk environments with constant exposure to traumatic events. Corporate jobs such as those held by lawyers, investment bankers, and corporate executives are characterized by high-pressure environments, long hours, and demanding clients. Customer service representatives face high burnout rates due to the volume of calls and dealing with challenging customers. Retail workers endure long hours and demanding customer interactions, while tech industry workers, particularly software developers, navigate tight deadlines and the need to keep up with new technologies. Journalists work under tight deadlines and irregular hours, and military personnel face high stress, physical danger, and long deployments away from family.

This chapter will explore these high burnout professions in greater detail, examining the specific factors contributing to burnout in each field. By understanding the unique challenges and stressors associated with these professions, we can better address the root causes of burnout and develop targeted strategies for prevention and intervention. Through recent research and case studies, this chapter aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of burnout and offer practical recommendations for individuals and organizations striving to combat burnout and enhance well-being. By promoting work-life balance, creating supportive work environments, and encouraging self-care, we can mitigate the effects of burnout and foster healthier, more sustainable lifestyles.

Advertisement

2. Root causes of burnout

Burnout is a multifaceted phenomenon arising from a complex interplay of organizational and personal factors. It is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment [1]. Organizational causes are often at the forefront, starting with excessive workload. When job demands exceed available resources, employees have little room for rest and recovery, leading to chronic stress and burnout. Unrealistic expectations and constant high-pressure demands further exacerbate this issue, placing undue strain on employees and fostering a high-stress environment [2].

A significant contributor to burnout is the need for more control over work processes, schedules, and decision-making. Employees who feel powerless and undervalued are particularly susceptible to burnout, significantly when micromanagement stifles their creativity and initiative [3]. This sense of powerlessness is often compounded by insufficient financial and intrinsic rewards, which diminish motivation and lead to feelings of futility and disengagement [4]. Moreover, poor workplace relationships and a lack of support from colleagues and supervisors create a toxic work environment. An unsupportive organizational culture that favors competition over collaboration exacerbates these conditions, making employees feel isolated and stressed [5].

Perceived unfairness in workload distribution, recognition, and promotions fosters employee resentment and mistrust. A lack of transparency in decision-making processes further erodes trust, making employees feel undervalued and unsupported. Additionally, conflicting values between an individual and the organization or being forced to compromise on personal ethics add significant stress. Excessive documentation is another critical factor contributing to burnout, as it increases workload, reduces time for core job functions, and causes mental fatigue. This is evident in various fields, such as healthcare, where Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems significantly contribute to physician burnout in the United States. Physicians report that EHR systems increase their workload and time spent on administrative tasks, leading to higher levels of burnout. However, this issue extends beyond healthcare, affecting professionals like lawyers, who must balance extensive legal documentation with precision and thoroughness, further contributing to mental exhaustion and burnout [6, 7].

Social workers, particularly those dealing with vulnerable populations such as children and families, are at high risk for burnout due to several unique factors. The emotional strain of constantly encountering traumatic and distressing situations, such as child abuse, domestic violence, and poverty, leads to significant emotional exhaustion. High workloads and large caseloads exacerbate this exhaustion as social workers struggle to adequately support each client within limited timeframes. Bureaucratic challenges, including navigating complex administrative systems and policies, contribute to feelings of inefficacy and decreased job satisfaction. The limited resources and support available to social workers further hinder their ability to meet their clients’ needs, resulting in helplessness and frustration. Additionally, the cumulative stress from hearing about and dealing with the traumatic experiences of clients can lead to secondary traumatic stress, a condition similar to PTSD, which further contributes to burnout [8, 9].

Military personnel, including active-duty soldiers, face unique challenges that contribute to high burnout rates. The high-stress environments and constant threat of physical danger, particularly during combat deployments, lead to mental exhaustion and burnout. Prolonged deployments away from family and loved ones create feelings of isolation and loneliness, exacerbating stress and burnout. Transitioning back to civilian life or between deployments can be particularly challenging, as soldiers struggle to adjust to different environments and expectations, increasing stress levels. Military personnel are also at a higher risk for mental health issues such as PTSD, depression, and anxiety due to their experiences in combat and high-stress situations. These conditions, if not adequately addressed, contribute significantly to burnout. Furthermore, the stigma and logistical barriers associated with seeking mental health care in the military prevent early intervention, increasing the risk of burnout [10, 11]. On a personal level, perfectionism plays a significant role in contributing to burnout. Individuals with perfectionistic tendencies set unrealistically high standards for themselves and are highly self-critical when they fall short, leading to chronic stress and dissatisfaction [2]. This drive for perfection often results in neglecting self-care, as individuals prioritize work and achievement over basic needs like adequate sleep, proper nutrition, and regular physical activity. Consequently, their emotional and physical reserves become depleted, exacerbating feelings of burnout [3].

Overcommitment to work and personal responsibilities without allowing time for rest also stems from perfectionistic ideals, where individuals feel compelled to meet their high standards and the expectations of others. This relentless pursuit of excellence leaves little room for recovery, increasing the risk of burnout [1]. Ineffective stress management techniques and a lack of solid support networks further exacerbate the situation, leaving individuals more vulnerable to stress and exhaustion [5].

Additionally, personality traits such as Type A characteristics and deriving self-worth from accomplishments intensify the pressure to perform perfectly, contributing to chronic stress [4]. External stressors, such as relationship issues, financial problems, or health concerns, combined with the challenge of balancing multiple roles, further increase the risk of burnout [1]. Thus, the interplay between perfectionism and self-neglect creates a vicious cycle that contributes to burnout.

Ultimately, the interaction between these organizational and personal factors creates a breeding ground for burnout. Addressing burnout effectively requires a holistic approach that considers both these domains. Organizations need to foster supportive environments promoting work-life balance, fairness, and recognition, while individuals must develop resilience through self-care, effective stress management, and robust support networks. Understanding and addressing the diverse causes of burnout are essential steps toward creating healthier and more productive workplaces and communities [2, 3].

Advertisement

3. Burnout consequences

The consequences of burnout are profound and multifaceted, affecting individuals, teams, and organizations. Understanding these consequences is essential for developing effective interventions and creating a supportive work environment.

For individuals, burnout has significant physical health implications. Studies indicate that those experiencing burnout are at a higher risk for cardiovascular diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic fatigue [12]. The stress associated with burnout can lead to elevated levels of cortisol and other stress hormones, negatively affecting the body’s systems. As a result, individuals often report increased incidence of headaches, gastrointestinal issues, and respiratory problems. Chronic stress also weakens the immune system, making individuals more susceptible to infections and illnesses. In terms of mental health, burnout significantly contributes to conditions such as depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders [13]. The emotional exhaustion component of burnout can lead to feelings of hopelessness and decreased life satisfaction and can also increase the risk of substance abuse as individuals may turn to alcohol or drugs to cope with their symptoms. Moreover, cognitive impairments, including difficulties with attention, memory, and executive function, are common among individuals with burnout [14].

Burnout’s detrimental effects on job performance are well-documented across multiple professions. Addressing burnout through effective interventions and supportive work environments is crucial to maintaining high levels of performance and well-being among professionals in all fields.

Extensive research has demonstrated that burnout significantly impacts job performance across various fields. In healthcare, burnout is linked to increased medical errors, reduced quality of patient care, and lower patient satisfaction. Physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals experiencing burnout are more likely to make diagnostic mistakes, overlook critical patient information, and exhibit diminished empathy, which can negatively affect patient outcomes [15, 16].

In healthcare, burnout is a critical factor contributing to medical errors. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that burnout among physicians is associated with a twofold increase in the likelihood of self-reported medical errors [17].

In the education sector, teacher burnout leads to decreased instructional quality, lower student engagement, and higher absenteeism rates. Burned-out teachers may struggle to maintain classroom discipline, show less enthusiasm for teaching, and are more prone to emotional exhaustion, which can negatively influence student learning and achievement [18].

Burnout affects employee productivity, creativity, and overall job performance in the corporate world. Employees experiencing burnout often display reduced motivation, increased absenteeism, and lower job satisfaction. Which can lead to reduced work quality, missed deadlines, and a higher likelihood of workplace conflicts [2].

Burnout also impacts teams, leading to decreased harmony and collaboration. Individuals experiencing burnout may withdraw from team activities and exhibit a reduced willingness to cooperate, negatively affecting team dynamics [19]. This lack of harmony can lead to conflicts, reduced motivation, and a decline in overall team performance, creating an unfriendly work environment that further contributes to stress and burnout among team members. High levels of burnout are also correlated with increased absenteeism and employee turnover [20]. Employees experiencing burnout are more likely to take sick leave or leave the organization altogether, disrupting team continuity and increasing the workload for remaining team members, perpetuating a cycle of increased demands and further burnout.

A study conducted in 2003 found that employees with high burnout levels took 3.6 times more sick leave than their non-burnout counterparts [21]. Regarding overall absenteeism rates, the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS) indicated that burnout-related absenteeism accounted for nearly 50% more absences compared to employees who are not experiencing burnout [22].

For organizations, burnout leads to significant declines in productivity. Burnout reduces both the quality and quantity of work produced by employees, with substantial financial implications [23]. Decreased productivity can result in missed deadlines, poor performance outcomes, and a decrease in overall operational efficiency. Additionally, the physical and mental health issues associated with burnout lead to higher healthcare costs for organizations. Studies have shown that burnout-related health problems result in increased medical claims and insurance costs [24]. The Harvard Business Review reported in 2017 that the cost of lost productivity due to burnout in the U.S. workforce could be as high as $125 billion to $190 billion annually. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that stress-related conditions, including burnout, cost U.S. businesses up to $300 billion annually in lost productivity and related expenses. These higher healthcare costs can strain organizational resources and reduce financial stability. Furthermore, burnout is inversely related to employee engagement. When employees are burned out, they exhibit lower levels of motivation, commitment, and job satisfaction [1]. This decline in employee engagement can lead to reduced innovation, poor customer service, and a negative organizational culture, making the achievement of strategic goals significantly more challenging.

Advertisement

4. Solutions and preventive strategies for burnout

As the prevalence of burnout continues to rise, recent researches have focused on many solutions and preventive measures to address its root causes and mitigate its impact.

Research by Demerouti et al. emphasizes job redesign to balance workload and demands, suggesting flexible work schedules and even task distribution as effective measures. Workload reduction can be achieved by implementing efficient task management systems and utilizing technological tools to automate repetitive tasks. Regular workload assessments and feedback mechanisms should be established to ensure that employees are not overwhelmed. Additionally, involving employees in decision-making processes regarding task allocation can foster a sense of empowerment and reduce perceived workload [25].

Job redesign in education might involve:

  • Reducing class sizes.

  • Allowing for flexible teaching schedules.

  • Distributing administrative tasks among support staff to alleviate these burdens and enhance teachers’ well-being [18].

Law firms can mitigate these effects in the legal profession by implementing job redesign strategies such as flexible working hours, balanced caseloads, and support systems for mental health. These strategies can help lawyers manage their workload and reduce burnout risk [7].

Additionally, organizations should clearly communicate their mission, vision, and values, and involve employees in shaping these aspects. Regularly reviewing and updating job roles and responsibilities to align with individual employees’ strengths and career aspirations can enhance job satisfaction and reduce burnout. Providing opportunities for professional development and career growth further ensures that employees feel valued and engaged [26].

Strong social support networks within the workplace, also, act as a buffer against stress. Fostering positive workplace relationships can be achieved through team-building activities, mentorship programs, and open communication channels. Encouraging collaboration and creating opportunities for social interaction, such as company outings and team lunches, can strengthen bonds among colleagues. Training programs focusing on communication skills, emotional intelligence, and conflict resolution can help build a more cohesive and supportive work environment, reducing the risk of burnout [27].

Moreover, recognition and rewards are critical in mitigating burnout, with Maslach and Leiter emphasizing the need for both formal and informal rewards to boost morale. Establishing a comprehensive recognition program that includes employee of the month awards, public acknowledgments, and performance-based bonuses can significantly enhance motivation. Additionally, informal recognition, such as verbal praise and personalized thank-you note, can create a positive work environment. Regularly celebrating milestones and achievements helps reinforce a culture of appreciation and motivates employees to maintain high-performance levels [1].

On top of that, implementing stress management programs, including mindfulness and resilience training, has been shown to be effective in reducing burnout. Introducing regular stress management workshops and mindfulness sessions can equip employees with tools to manage stress effectively. Encouraging practices such as meditation, deep breathing exercises, and other relaxation techniques can help employees maintain emotional well-being. Creating a culture that promotes mental health awareness and provides access to resources, such as employee assistance programs and counseling services, can further support stress management [28].

Finally, enhancing work-life balance plays a critical role in preventing burnout. Organizations should implement policies that support work-life balance, such as flexible working hours and remote work options, to ensure employees have sufficient time for personal and family life [29]. A study performed at the Australian National University found that a healthy limit on work is 39 hours per week. Working more than 40 hours per week could hurt employees’ physical and mental health, increasing the risk of burnout [30]. Encouraging employees to take regular breaks and vacations and disconnect from work during non-working hours is essential. Promoting a healthy work-life balance through initiatives like wellness programs, gym memberships, and family-friendly policies can improve overall well-being and productivity [29].

Addressing stress and burnout in military personnel is a critical issue, given their high risk of experiencing burnout. Preventive measures to mitigate this risk require a multifaceted approach. Effective strategies involve them in periodic structured stress management programs that teach mindfulness and relaxation techniques, as well as resilience training to enhance coping skills [31]. Leader interventions play a crucial role, where military leaders are trained to recognize and address stress among their subordinates [32]. Finally, removing barriers to accessing mental health services and encouraging their use is essential for reducing stigma and improving mental health outcomes [33].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Burnout is a complex and pervasive issue influenced by organizational and personal factors. Excessive workload, lack of control, insufficient rewards, poor workplace relationships, perceived unfairness, and conflicting organizational values significantly contribute to burnout. The interaction between these factors creates a cycle of chronic stress that can lead to severe burnout. However, addressing this issue is entirely within our reach. We can effectively combat burnout by adopting a holistic approach that creates supportive organizational environments and fosters individual resilience. Organizations can implement strategies to distribute workloads more evenly, give employees greater control over their work, and ensure that rewards and recognition are fair and sufficient. Improving workplace relationships and addressing perceived unfairness can also play a significant role in reducing burnout. Understanding and mitigating the diverse causes of burnout enable us to build healthier and more productive workplaces and communities. Promoting open communication and providing mental health resources are essential for a brighter future. These initiatives can create a more inclusive and supportive workplace culture where employees feel valued and heard. Emphasizing the importance of work-life balance will further enhance employee well-being and lead to more tremendous organizational success. Furthermore, fostering a continuous learning and development culture can empower employees to grow and adapt, reducing the likelihood of burnout. Encouraging employees to take regular breaks, engage in physical activity, and pursue hobbies can also contribute to their overall well-being. By prioritizing employee health and happiness, organizations can create an environment where everyone has the opportunity to thrive. Together, we can create a thriving work culture where everyone has the opportunity to flourish. Through organizational and individual collaborative efforts, we can turn the tide on burnout and pave the way for a future where workplaces are vibrant, supportive, and conducive to personal and professional growth. With commitment and concerted action, we can ensure that burnout becomes a challenge of the past, replaced by a culture of resilience and well-being.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

I would like to extend my profound gratitude to the Al-Ahsa Health Cluster for their support and resources, which have significantly contributed to the development and completion of this chapter. The author acknowledges the use of ChatGPT to polish the language of the manuscript.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Notes/thanks/other declarations

We would like to express our sincere appreciation to our families and friends for their steadfast support and encouragement throughout the writing of this chapter.

References

  1. 1. Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103-111. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911781/
  2. 2. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001;52:397-422. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
  3. 3. Schaufeli WB, Enzmann D. The Burnout Companion to Study and Practice: A Critical Analysis. 1st ed. CRC Press; 1998. DOI: 10.1201/9781003062745
  4. 4. Leiter MP, Maslach C. Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In: Emotional and Physiological Processes and Positive Intervention Strategies, Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being. Vol. 3. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2004. pp. 91-134. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271732543_Areas_of_Worklife_A_Structured_Approach_to_Organizational_Predictors_of_Job_Burnout
  5. 5. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309-328. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02683940710733115/full/html
  6. 6. Budd J. Burnout related to electronic health record use in primary care. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health. 2023;14:21501319231166921. DOI: 10.1177/21501319231166921
  7. 7. Tsai FJ, Huang WL, Chan CC. Occupational stress and burnout of lawyers. Journal of Occupational Health. 2009;51:443-450. DOI: 10.1539/joh.L8179
  8. 8. Maslach C, Leiter MP. Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):103-11. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20311
  9. 9. Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C. Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International. 2009;14(3):204-220
  10. 10. Morse G, Salyers MP, Rollins AL, Monroe-DeVita M, Pfahler C. Burnout in mental health services: A review of the problem and its remediation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2012;39(5):341-352
  11. 11. Hoge CW, Castro CA, Messer SC, Mc Gurk D, Cotting DI, Koffman RL. Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(1):13-22
  12. 12. Salvagioni DAJ, Melanda FN, Mesas AE, González AD, Gabani FL, Andrade SM. Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185781
  13. 13. Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Laurent E. Burnout–depression overlap: A review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2015;36:28-41
  14. 14. Deligkaris P, Panagopoulou E, Montgomery AJ, Masoura E. Job burnout and cognitive functioning: A systematic review. Work and Stress. 2014;28(2):107-123
  15. 15. Friedberg M, Van Busum K, Chen P, Aunon F, Pham C, Caloyeras J, et al. Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction. 2013. DOI: 10.7249/RB9740
  16. 16. Brooks SK, Gerada C, Chalder T. Review of literature on the mental health of doctors: Are specialist services needed? Journal of Mental Health. 2011;20(2):146-156. DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2010.541300
  17. 17. Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(6):995-1000
  18. 18. Shernoff ES, Mehta TG, Atkins MS, Torf R, Spencer J. A qualitative study of the sources and impact of stress among urban teachers. School Mental Health. 2011;3(2):59-69. DOI: 10.1007/s12310-011-9051-z
  19. 19. Taris TW, van Horn JE, Schaufeli WB, Schreurs PJ. Inequity, burnout, and psychological withdrawal among teachers: A dynamic exchange model. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping. 2004;17(1):103-122
  20. 20. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, van Rhenen W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2009;30(7):893-917
  21. 21. Janssen PPM, Bakker AB, de Jong A. A test and refinement of the demand-control-support model in the construction industry. International Journal of Stress Management. 2003;10(4):409-425
  22. 22. Parent-Thirion A, Aumayr-Pintar C. Burnout in the workplace: A review of data and policy responses in the EU. 2018
  23. 23. Bakker AB, Costa PL. Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysis. Burnout Research. 2014;1(3):112-119
  24. 24. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Leiter M. Burnout and job performance: The moderating role of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2014;19(1):96-107. DOI: 10.1037/a0035062
  25. 25. Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, Schaufeli WB. The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(3):499-512
  26. 26. Leiter MP, Maslach C. Burnout and engagement: Contributions to a new vision. Burnout Research. 2017;5:55-57
  27. 27. Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2018;5:103-128
  28. 28. Hülsheger UR, Alberts HJ, Feinholdt A, Lang JW. Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013;98(2):310-325
  29. 29. Greenhaus J, Allen T. Work-Family Balance: A Review and Extension of the Literature. 2011
  30. 30. Kivimäki M, Jokela M, Nyberg ST, Singh-Manoux A, Fransson EI, Alfredsson L, et al. Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603,838 individuals. Lancet. 2015;386(10005):1739-1746. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60295-1
  31. 31. Romani M, Ashkar K. Burnout among physicians. Libyan Journal of Medicine. 2014;9(1):23556. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ljm/article/view/102795/93058
  32. 32. Blais AR, Howell G, Wang Z, Comeau C. Leader Interventions for Psychological Health and Safety Solutions. Ottawa: Department of National Defence; 2018. Available from: https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/STO-MP-HFM-302/MP-HFM-302-09.pdf
  33. 33. Ho TE, Burchett D, Osborn MM, Smith CM, Shechter OG. Military Leaders’ Use of Behavioral Health Resources: Barriers to Care and Possible Solutions. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Personnel and Security Research Center; 2019

Written By

Abrar Alkhudhayr and Qasem Aljabr

Submitted: 14 June 2024 Reviewed: 17 June 2024 Published: 07 August 2024