Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid development of micro/nano optics, biophotonics, and biomedicine, micro/nano optical devices have been widely used in biosensing, medical imaging, molecular diagnosis, and other fields due to their advantages of miniaturization and integration. However, micro/nano optical devices composed of semiconductor and precious metal materials are prone to irreversible physical damage to biological cells and tissues and require chemical synthesis, which cannot be naturally degraded in vivo. In addition, due to the limitation of solid materials, micro/nano optical devices are difficult to deform and move in practical applications such as optical imaging and signal detection. Therefore, it is necessary to find a natural, biocompatible, biodegradable, and controllable micro/nano optical device. During the evolution of nature, some organisms have formed bio-optical devices that can manipulate light beams. For example, algal cells have the ability to concentrate light, which can improve the efficiency of photosynthesis. Visual nerve cells have the ability to direct light and transmit images to the retina with low loss and distortion. These natural materials capable of light regulation bring new opportunities for biological micro/nano optical devices, which have potential applications in the assembly of biological cells, detection of biological signals, imaging in vivo, and single-cell diagnosis.
Keywords
- optical micro/nanofibers
- microlenses
- bioimaging
- optical detection
- biomedicine
1. Introduction
High-sensitivity detection of biological signals and magnified imaging
In the process of evolution of nature, some organisms have formed bio-optical devices that can regulate light beams, which provides inspiration for the construction of biocompatible and biodegradable micro/nano optical devices. These bio-optics are expected to realize biological signal detection,
This book chapter aims to review the fundamental principles and essential technologies of microlenses and nanofibers, along with their applications in biomedicine including optical devices, signal detection, and biological imaging. Specifically, it summarizes the fabrication of microlenses and nanofibers from natural biological materials like biological cells, spider silk, and diatoms. Furthermore, we have highlighted the issues and challenges faced by bio-inspired microlenses and nanofibers while exploring the future development directions of these technologies.
2. Biological microlens
2.1 Biological microlenses in nature
In nature, we are able to observe different types of microlens structures in animals and plants. In the optic nervous system, when a light beam enters the eye through the cornea, the refractive power of the cornea bends the light, so the light can pass freely through the pupil, and then, the light passes through the microsphere lens, where it converges into a focal point on the retina, and the image conversion is formed on the retina. The electrical impulses are transmitted by the optic nerve to the brain, as shown in Figure 1a. In addition, mitochondria in the eye’s photoreceptor cells also act as microlenses, helping transport light from the inside of the cell to the outside of the cell and converting it into neural signals. Ball et al. used confocal microscopy to observe the optical properties of mitochondria [22]. When the light from the light-emitting diode passes through the mitochondria, the side of the mitochondria can be focused into a beam with high brightness, and the half-width of the focused beam is 1 μm, as shown in Figure 1b. In plants, organisms such as algal cells convert solar energy into chemical energy through photosynthesis and store it in the plant. The stored chemical energy can be released to provide fuel for the activities of the organism and its life energy [26, 27]. Schuegers et al. discovered that cyanobacteria have phototaxis, which can directly and accurately perceive the location of light sources. This is because cyanobacterial cells act as microlenses, confining incident light to a focal point near the plasma membrane on the back of the light source. Photoreceptors on the cell membrane sense the light and drive the pili to pull towards the side close to the light source, thereby driving the cell to move towards the light source (as shown in Figure 1c) [23]. To measure the perturbations of light by cyanobacterial cells in the near field with high resolution, the team used a photolithographic method in which cyanobacterial cells were adsorbed on the surface of a photopolymer and UV light was projected vertically onto the cells so that each cell produces a sharp peak beneath the center. In addition, diatoms in plants also have the ability to focus light [24]. When the 100 μm red laser spot is reduced to 10 μm after passing through the diatom with regular geometrical structure, this focusing effect is produced by the superposition of the scattered waves from the holes on the surface of the diatom flap, which proves that the diatom has the function of microlens [28]. As shown in Figure 1d, as the illumination wavelength increases, the position of the focus of diatoms along the optical axis gradually decreases [25]. Researchers have gradually demonstrated that spherical or cylindrical objects with an index of refraction less than 2 can produce light-focusing effects.
![](/media/chapter/a043Y000011YN0rQAG/a09Tc000000hCAnIAM/media/F1.png)
Figure 1.
Biological microlenses in nature. (a) Schematic diagram of the eye focusing on light. (b) Vertical anatomy of a cone photoreceptor and optical properties of mitochondria under light [
Most living organisms are composed of proteins, water, and carbohydrates in nature. These biological materials have a refractive index of less than 2 under visible light conditions and can confine the light beam in the living organism, which makes the use of biological materials as Concentrators become possible [29, 30]. Monks et al. found that natural spider silk can act as a microlens [31]. When the spider silk is in close contact with the imaging object, the near-field evanescent waves of the imaging object can be transferred to the far-field by the spider silk, thereby realizing super-resolution imaging. This imaging process from near-field to far-field conversion is extremely sensitive to the gap distance between the spider silk and the object. Through experiments and simulations, it was found that when the gap between the spider silk and the imaging object is less than 100 nm, the micro/nano structure is magnified and imaged, thereby realizing super-resolution imaging. Therefore, under dry conditions, spider silk cannot achieve super-resolution imaging. Mammalian cells also exhibit lensing behavior. Miccio et al. demonstrated that suspended red blood cells can act as microlenses at the microscale. Due to the inherent elastic properties of erythrocytes, by changing the osmotic pressure, the shape of erythrocytes can be expanded from a disc shape to a spherical shape, and the focal length adjustment from negative to positive values is realized [32], thus demonstrating the imaging ability of erythrocytes and the advantages of adjustable focal length.
2.2 Application of biological microlenses in optical imaging
Synthetic microsphere lenses combined with optical microscopy imaging devices can be used in the field of biological imaging, but polymer microspheres are easy to cause damage to biological cells and tissues. When observing the structure of biological cells
![](/media/chapter/a043Y000011YN0rQAG/a09Tc000000hCAnIAM/media/F2.png)
Figure 2.
Optical imaging of biological microlenses. (a) Schematic illustration of the assembled erythrocyte microlenses imaging the cell membrane [
Using the same method, the tip of the optical fiber can trap yeast under the action of light force, and the trapped yeast can be used as a biological amplifier, which can realize real-time magnification imaging of nanostructures and any position of biological samples under an optical microscope [35]. As shown in Figure 2b, under the ordinary light microscope, the intracellular fibrous cytoskeleton and the double-layered structure of the cell membrane are difficult to distinguish. When the yeast trapped by the optical fiber is placed above the epithelial cells, the incident light and the reflected light are passed through. The interference effect of the cytoskeleton can enhance the interaction between light and matter, and the double-layer structure of the cytoskeleton and the cell membrane can be clearly seen. This process does not require the use of specific fluorescent molecules to label cells, providing a direct imaging method for biomedicine. In order to increase the imaging field and imaging efficiency, Jiang et al. used fiber-optic tweezers to trap yeast [36]. Because of the spherical shape of the yeast, the capture laser can be focused to a very small area through the yeast and can exert a strong light force on the connected yeast, which are arranged in an orderly cell chain under the action of light superposition. When the cell chain is in the vicinity of the imaged sample, the biological chain can act as a near-field magnifying glass, capable of capturing sub-diffraction information of nanoscale objects under each cell and projecting them into the far field (as shown in Figure 2c). This label-free, real-time nanoimaging device lays a solid foundation for the development of super-resolution imaging devices and systems for biomedicine.
2.3 Application of biological microlenses in signal detection
Due to the advantages of high biocompatibility and good bioabsorbability of biological cells, biological cells have great potential in biosensing and signal detection. When a highly focused beam irradiates a biological microlens, the microlens can generate a subwavelength-sized focused spot in its near-field region, resulting in a high localized light intensity. This is due to the interaction between the scattering field of the microsphere lens and the incident light beam passing through the microsphere, which allows the microsphere lens to enhance the interaction between photons and substances under the illumination of the incident light, enhance the fluorescence signal, and realize the control of the object signal. Using biological microlenses to detect and enhance fluorescence signals provides a convenient and low-cost method for nanomaterial characterization and biomolecular diagnosis [37, 38, 39]. In 2017, Li et al. used spherical yeast and biological cells as natural biological microlenses to enhance upconversion fluorescence [40]. First, the optical fiber is placed in the upconversion nanoparticle suspension, and near-infrared light with a wavelength of 980 nm and an optical power of 3 mW is passed into the optical fiber probe. The upconversion nanoparticle suspension can be directly affected by the output laser of the optical fiber probe. As shown in Figure 3a and b when the optical force is used to trap biological cells at the tip of the fiber probe, the fluorescence intensity of the upconversion nanoparticle suspension excited by the incident laser is significantly enhanced. Under the action of the optical gradient force, the photon jet generated by the biological microlens can trap a single
![](/media/chapter/a043Y000011YN0rQAG/a09Tc000000hCAnIAM/media/F3.png)
Figure 3.
Optical detection of biological microlenses. (a and b) Biomicrolenses enhance the fluorescence of upconverting nanoparticles. (c–f) Enhanced fluorescence of single
Due to the diffraction limit of light, individual nanoparticles cannot be directly observed and detected under an optical microscope until the particles are trapped, although faint fluorescent spots from the nanoparticles can be seen in fluorescence mode. When a single nanoparticle was captured in the yeast’s focus, the nanoparticle was able to be seen clearly in both optical and fluorescence images due to the magnification mechanism of the microlens. When a single nanoparticle is released, the nanoparticle moves away from the focus of the biomagnifier due to the strong Brownian motion in the aqueous environment, and the size and fluorescence intensity of the nanoparticle observed under the microscope are compared with the case of the trapped nanoparticle somewhat reduced. In addition, since the highly focused beam generated by the microlens is illuminated on the nanoparticles, the backscattered signal of the trapped nanoparticles is enhanced. By analyzing the intensity and angular distribution of enhanced backscattering from nanoparticles located within the nanojet, one can derive the nanoparticle’s size and relative position with nanometer precision. In order to improve the sensitivity and biocompatibility of optical detection, Li et al. used yeast as a biological lens and used optical fiber probes to capture yeast to enhance the backscattering signal of
3. Bio-optical micro/nanofiber
3.1 Bio-optical micro/nanofibers in nature
Signal detection and optical imaging of biological samples are of great significance in the research of biomedical applications such as biosensing and medical diagnosis. Because the biological optical micro/nanofiber can manipulate the light beam in a controlled manner, it will not cause irreversible physical damage to the biological sample during biological imaging and signal detection in the biological environment. Therefore, it is of great significance to construct biocompatible and movable biological optical micro/nanofibers. In the natural environment, natural optical micro/nanofibers can be widely observed in animals and plants. In the optic nervous system, the retina of vertebrates has specific optical properties, and light must penetrate multiple cell layers to reach the photoreceptor cells. As shown in Figure 4a, the geometry of Müller cells is similar to that of optical fibers so that Müller cells in their physiological environment can act as optical micro/nanofibers, allowing light to pass through the channels of the retina with low scattering. At the same time, the Müller cells arranged in parallel can direct light directly to their respective cone photoreceptors, thus maintaining the original image resolution and minimizing image distortion [41]. Furthermore, Müller cells enhance the signal-to-noise ratio by minimizing scattering and preserving the spatial distribution of light patterns in the propagating image [46]. Photons produced by bioluminescent organs are usually guided by some micro/nanofiber structure and emitted in a specific pattern. The jellyfish, for example, is mainly made of a translucent gel-like substance, the tunica media, which has a water content of up to 95–98%, and its bioluminescence is guided by fiber-like antennae to be used as bait to attract prey [47]; when the floating silkworm is stimulated externally, it can produce yellow light on its feet (as shown in Figure 4b and c) [42].
![](/media/chapter/a043Y000011YN0rQAG/a09Tc000000hCAnIAM/media/F4.png)
Figure 4.
Types of bio-optical micro/nanofibers. (a) Müller cells guide light from retina to photoreceptor cells [
In plants, some photoreceptors exist at the root of the plant, allowing the roots to sense different wavelengths of light [43]. As shown in Figure 4d, there are photoreceptors activated by light in root cells, which can act as natural optical micro/nanofiber devices to receive the stimulation of light beams. In addition, the roots of plants can receive information on light conditions through signal molecules and respond to the signal molecules, allowing the light beam to travel from the stem to the root. At the same time, the roots of the plant can also directly sense the light transmitted by the plant tissue. As shown in Figure 4e, the stem of the plant acts as an optical fiber that can conduct light to the phytochrome receptors in the root, triggering the production of the HY5 protein, which promotes healthy root growth [44]. As shown in Figure 4f, when the laser irradiated the corn roots and oat seedlings, the light energy was extended in a curve to the tips of the roots, which promoted the germination of the plants [45]. In addition, various optical micro/nanofibers can also be fabricated from naturally derived materials such as spider silk [48], cellulose [49], and bacterial cells [50] in nature. Spider silk has been shown to be an efficient optical fiber in various environments with an optical loss of 10.5 dB/cm. Natural spider silk fibers are also capable of delivering light in physiological fluids and integrated photonic chips. Through genetic engineering, large-scale production of spider silk proteins has become possible. Recently, researchers have created optical micro/nanofibers by using genetically engineered spider silk proteins [51]. In addition, the recombinant spider silk optical micro/nanofiber contributes to the efficient propagation of light due to its smoother surface, higher refractive index, and lower optical loss, which can deliver light to deep tissues with lower optical loss. Based on the light-guiding ability of a single cell, using optical power to assemble cellular micro/nanofibers can transmit light.
3.2 Application of bio-optical micro/nanofiber in biomedicine
Natural biomaterials with high biocompatibility and biodegradability have been extensively studied for various medical applications such as drug delivery, biosensing, and optical imaging [52, 53, 54, 55]. Silk fibroin films were prepared from aqueous solutions of silk fibroin polymers, and crystallinity was induced and controlled by methanol treatment. In the process of processing into thin films, dextran and proteins of different molecular weights are encapsulated in the drug delivery device, and the drug release effect of silk fibroin can be evaluated by drug release kinetics [56]. In terms of biosensing and detection, light-capturing force is used to capture yeast cells and lactobacillus chains at the tip of an optical fiber. When light propagates through this biological chain, a beam with a half-width of 190 nm can be formed (as shown in Figure 5a) [57]. This biological micro/nanofiber can be used to detect the local fluorescence of leukemia cells in human blood; that is, when the biological micro/nanofiber is far away from the leukemia cells, no fluorescence can be detected. When the optical micro/nanofiber is in close contact with the cell membrane, a distinct fluorescent spot appears in leukemia cells stained with green fluorescent protein, which enables real-time detection of optical signals in the near field with subwavelength resolution. This biological cell-based optical micro/nanofiber can bend without damaging the cell membrane when it contacts the cell, and is highly flexible and deformable. At the same time, Wu et al. used the light-harvesting force to assemble a photofluidic cell chain of
![](/media/chapter/a043Y000011YN0rQAG/a09Tc000000hCAnIAM/media/F5.png)
Figure 5.
Applications of bio-optical micro/nanofibers. (a) Bio-optical micro/nanofibers for single-cell detection [
4. Conclusions
To sum up, the noncontact and noninvasive signal detection and optical imaging of nanoparticles and biomolecules in the microenvironment has important research value and potential application prospects in the fields of biomedicine and nanophotonics. Biophotonic devices such as bio-microlenses and bio-optical micro/nanofibers have played an important role in scientific research. However, in the process of rapid scientific development, due to the good flexibility and membrane elasticity of biological materials, biological microlenses and biological optical micro/nanofibers have an important impact on the detection of microbial environment and the manipulation of living bodies. Using the radiation force generated by the focused optical field of the optical tweezers, operations such as capturing, stretching, and rotating the object can be achieved without contact and damage.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (no. 2021B1515020046), National Key Research and Development Program of China (no. 2022YFA1206300), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 62135005, 62305132, and 12304322). Y.L. and H.L. contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.
Chen C, Wang J. Optical biosensors: An exhaustive and comprehensive review. Analyst. 2020; 145 :1605-1628. DOI: 10.1039/C9AN01998G - 2.
Su J, Goldberg A, Stoltz B. Label-free detection of single nanoparticles and biological molecules using microtoroid optical resonators. Light: Science & Applications. 2016; 5 :e16001. DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2016.1 - 3.
Parandin F et al. Two-dimensional photonic crystal biosensors: A review. Optics & Laser Technology. 2021; 144 :107397. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107397 - 4.
Li L et al. Optical fiber optofluidic bio-chemical sensors: A review. Laser & Photonics Reviews. 2021; 15 :2000526. DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202000526 - 5.
Homola J. Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species. Chemical Reviews. 2008; 108 :462-493. DOI: 10.1021/cr068107d - 6.
Mayer KM, Hafner JH. Localized surface plasmon resonance sensors. Chemical Reviews. 2011; 111 :3828-3857. DOI: 10.1021/cr100313v - 7.
Khan AU, Zhao S, Liu G. Key parameter controlling the sensitivity of plasmonic metal nanoparticles: Aspect ratio. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2016; 120 :19353-19364. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06519 - 8.
Fernández Gavela A, Grajales García D, Ramirez JC, Lechuga LM. Last advances in silicon-based optical biosensors. Sensors. 2016; 16 :285. DOI: 10.3390/s16030285 - 9.
Zhang L, Tang Y, Tong LM. Micro-/nanofiber optics: Merging photonics and material science on nanoscale for advanced sensing technology. Iscience. 2020; 23 :100810. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.100810 - 10.
Rho D, Breaux C, Kim S. Label-free optical resonator-based biosensors. Sensors. 2020; 20 :5901. DOI: 10.3390/s20205901 - 11.
Zhi Y et al. Single nanoparticle detection using optical microcavities. Advanced Materials. 2017; 29 :1604920. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201604920 - 12.
Kakimi R et al. Capture of a terahertz wave in a photonic-crystal slab. Nature Photonics. 2014; 8 :657-663. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.150 - 13.
Shi Y et al. On-chip optical detection of viruses: A review. Advanced Photonics Research. 2021; 2 :2000150. DOI: 10.1002/adpr.202000150 - 14.
Li Y et al. Optical fiber technologies for nanomanipulation and biodetection: A review. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2021; 39 :251-262. DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2020.3023456 - 15.
Wu X, Tong L. Optical microfibers and nanofibers. Nanophotonics. 2013; 2 :407-428. DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2013-0033 - 16.
Zou X et al. Advanced optical imaging based on metasurfaces. Advanced Optical Materials. 2023; 12 :2203149. DOI: 10.1002/adom.202203149 - 17.
Toropov N et al. Review of biosensing with whispering-gallery mode lasers. Light: Science & Applications. 2021; 10 :42. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00471-3 - 18.
Shan D et al. Polymeric biomaterials for biophotonic applications. Bioactive Materials. 2018; 3 :434-445. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.07.001 - 19.
Chen YC, Fan X. Biological lasers for biomedical applications. Advanced Optical Materials. 2019; 7 :1900377. DOI: 10.1002/adom.201900377 - 20.
Miccio L et al. Optobiology: Live cells in optics and photonics. Journal of Physics: Photonics. 2020; 3 :012003. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7647/abac19 - 21.
Pan T, Lu D, Xin H, Li B. Biophotonic probes for bio-detection and imaging. Light: Science & Applications. 2021; 10 :124. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00561-2 - 22.
Ball JM, Chen S, Li W. Mitochondria in cone photoreceptors act as microlenses to enhance photon delivery and confer directional sensitivity to light. Science Advances. 2022; 8 :eabn2070. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn2070 - 23.
Schuergers N et al. Cyanobacteria use micro-optics to sense light direction. eLife. 2016; 5 :e12620. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12620 - 24.
De Tommasi E et al. Biologically enabled sub-diffractive focusing. Optics Express. 2014; 22 :27214-27227. DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.027214 - 25.
Ferrara MA et al. Optical properties of diatom nanostructured biosilica in Arachnoidiscus sp: Micro-optics from mother nature. PLoS One. 2014;9 :e103750. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103750 - 26.
Jacobs M et al. Photonic multilayer structure of Begonia chloroplasts enhances photosynthetic efficiency. Nature Plants. 2016; 2 :16162. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.162 - 27.
Karabourniotis G. Light-guiding function of foliar sclereids in the evergreen sclerophyll Phillyrea latifolia: A quantitative approach. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1998; 49 :739-746. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/49.321.739 - 28.
De Stefano L et al. Lensless light focusing with the centric marine diatom Coscinodiscus walesii. Optics Express. 2007; 15 :18082-18088. DOI: 10.1364/OE.15.018082 - 29.
Tadepalli S et al. Bio-optics and bio-inspired optical materials. Chemical Reviews. 2017; 117 :12705-12763. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00153 - 30.
Ren J et al. Biological material interfaces as inspiration for mechanical and optical material designs. Chemical Reviews. 2019; 119 :12279-12336. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00416 - 31.
Monks JN et al. Spider silk: Mother nature’s bio-superlens. Nano Letters. 2016; 16 :5842-5845. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02641 - 32.
Miccio L et al. Red blood cell as an adaptive optofluidic microlens. Nature Communications. 2015; 6 :6502. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7502 - 33.
Yan Y et al. Microsphere-coupled scanning laser confocal nanoscope for sub-diffraction-limited imaging at 25 nm lateral resolution in the visible spectrum. ACS Nano. 2014; 8 :1809-1816. DOI: 10.1021/nn406201q - 34.
Liu X et al. Red-blood-cell-based microlens: Application to single-cell membrane imaging and stretching. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2019; 2 :2889-2895. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00274 - 35.
Li Y, Liu X, Li B. Single-cell biomagnifier for optical nanoscopes and nanotweezers. Light: Science & Applications. 2019; 8 :61. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-019-0168-4 - 36.
Jiang C et al. Label-free non-invasive subwavelength-resolution imaging using yeast cells as biological lenses. Biomedical Optics Express. 2021; 12 :7113-7121. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.437965 - 37.
Gérard D et al. Strong electromagnetic confinement near dielectric microspheres to enhance single-molecule fluorescence. Optics Express. 2008; 16 :15297-15303. DOI: 10.1364/OE.16.015297 - 38.
Aouani H et al. Two-photon fluorescence correlation spectroscopy with high count rates and low background using dielectric microspheres. Biomedical Optics Express. 2010; 1 :1075-1083. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.1.001075 - 39.
Wenger J, Rigneault H. Photonic methods to enhance fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and single molecule fluorescence detection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010; 11 :206-221. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11010206 - 40.
Li Y et al. Enhancing upconversion fluorescence with a natural bio-microlens. ACS Nano. 2017; 11 :10672-10680. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04420 - 41.
Franze K et al. Müller cells are living optical fibers in the vertebrate retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007; 104 :8287-8292. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0611180104 - 42.
Francis WR, Powers ML, Haddock SH. Characterization of an anthraquinone fluor from the bioluminescent, pelagic polychaete Tomopteris. Luminescence. 2014; 29 :1135-1140. DOI: 10.1002/bio.2671 - 43.
Lee HJ et al. Stem-piped light activates phytochrome B to trigger light responses in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Science Signaling. 2016;9 :ra106. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaf6530 - 44.
Zhang Y et al. HY5 contributes to light-regulated root system architecture under a root-covered culture system. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019; 10 :1490. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01490 - 45.
Mandoli DF, Briggs WR. Fiber optics in plants. Scientific American. 1984; 251 :90-99. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0884-90 - 46.
Agte S et al. Müller glial cell-provided cellular light guidance through the vital Guinea-pig retina. Biophysical Journal. 2011; 101 :2611-2619. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.062 - 47.
Haddock SH, Moline MA, Case JF. Bioluminescence in the sea. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2010; 2 :443-493. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081028 - 48.
Huby N et al. Native spider silk as a biological optical fiber. Applied Physics Letters. 2013; 102 :123702. DOI: 10.1063/1.4798552 - 49.
Dupuis A et al. Prospective for biodegradable microstructured optical fibers. Optics Letters. 2007; 32 :109-111. DOI: 10.1364/ol.32.000109 - 50.
Xin H, Li Y, Liu X, Li B. Escherichia coli -based biophotonic waveguides. Nano Letters. 2013;13 :3408-3413. DOI: 10.1021/nl401870d - 51.
Qiao X et al. Synthetic engineering of spider silk fiber as implantable optical waveguides for low-loss light guiding. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2017; 9 :14665-14676. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01752 - 52.
Wenk E, Merkle HP, Meinel L. Silk fibroin as a vehicle for drug delivery applications. Journal of Controlled Release. 2011; 150 :128-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.007 - 53.
Pritchard EM, Kaplan DL. Silk fibroin biomaterials for controlled release drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2011; 8 :797-811. DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2011.568936 - 54.
Bezryadina A et al. Nonlinear self-action of light through biological suspensions. Physical Review Letters. 2017; 119 :058101. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.058101 - 55.
Sykes EA, Albanese A, Chan WC. Implantable waveguides. Nature Photonics. 2013; 7 :940-941. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.308 - 56.
Hofmann S et al. Silk fibroin as an organic polymer for controlled drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release. 2006; 111 :219-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.12.009 - 57.
Li Y et al. Living nanospear for near-field optical probing. ACS Nano. 2018; 12 :10703-10711. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05235 - 58.
Li Y et al. Red-blood-cell waveguide as a living biosensor and micromotor. Advanced Functional Materials. 2019; 29 :1905568. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201905568 - 59.
Wu T et al. Waveguiding and focusing in a bio-medium with an optofluidic cell chain. Acta Biomaterialia. 2020; 103 :165-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.004 - 60.
Gong Z et al. Upconversion nanoparticle decorated spider silks as single-cell thermometers. Nano Letters. 2021; 21 :1469-1476. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04644