Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

A Comprehensive Guide of Cellular Blood-Derived and Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Autologous Biological Preparations for Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Wound Healing

Written By

Peter A. Everts, Luga Podesta and Robert W. Alexander

Submitted: 25 March 2024 Reviewed: 19 August 2024 Published: 12 September 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1006741

Wound Healing - New Frontiers and Strategies IntechOpen
Wound Healing - New Frontiers and Strategies Edited by Peter A. Everts

From the Edited Volume

Wound Healing - New Frontiers and Strategies [Working Title]

Dr. Peter A. Everts and Dr. Robert W. Alexander

Chapter metrics overview

15 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The use of autologous biological preparations (ABPs) and their combinations fills a void in health care treatment options that exists between surgical procedures and current pharmaceutical treatments. There is a wide range of ABPs that can safely and effectively be prepared at point of care using tissues from the patient such as peripheral blood, bone marrow, and adipose tissue to treat a wide range of clinical conditions. The use of blood-derived and mesenchymal stem cell cellular preparations plays important roles in the modulation of tissue repair processes in complex biological settings. Biological products derived from autologous tissues are advantageous because of their autologous nature and their safety profiles. ABPs include platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow concentrates (BMCs), and adipose tissue complex (ATC) with its unique stromal vascular fractions (SVFs). In addition, ABPs can be combined to create biological preparations that are more diverse and possess a high degree of regenerative activity and potential. Likewise, concentrated acellular plasma proteins can generate a temporary fibrin matrix to interact with the bioactive molecules of various ABPs. Practitioners reason that the application of ABPs can mimic the classical healing and angiogenesis cascades to initiate tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing during non-surgical interventions, aiming to restore the integrity and function of damaged tissues.

Keywords

  • autologous
  • biological preparations
  • tissue repair
  • tissue regeneration
  • wound healing
  • platelet-rich plasma
  • bone marrow aspirate concentrate
  • mesenchymal stem cell
  • adipose tissue stromal vascular fraction
  • protein rich platelet concentrate

1. Introduction

Various pathological conditions, chronic recalcitrant wounds, damaged tissue structures, or degenerative tissues may cause wound healing and tissue repair to be highly complex and dynamic processes. These conditions dependent upon local and systemic multicellular biological processes including cell signaling [1, 2, 3, 4]. The application of autologous biological preparations, prepared at point-of-care, hold the promise of promoting tissue healing, regeneration, and repair in a natural fashion [5]. Blood-derived and mesenchymal stem cell-based preparations play key roles in tissue repair mechanisms and the modulation of wound healing processes in complex biological microenvironments. Moreover, plasma and concentrated proteins in a provisional fibrin matrix can interact with bioactive molecules and cells and controlling the spatial-temporal distribution of these molecules and cells [6]. There is an unmet need in treatment options of degenerative and traumatized tissues, difficult-to-heal acute and chronic wounds. Regenerative medicine is an area of specialized, interventional, and non-surgical medicine, often not achievable via surgery of medications. In general, ABPs for therapeutic interventions are increasingly being utilized to support the healing of chronic wounds and the repair and regeneration of tissues by delivering allogeneic or autologously prepared biological cells.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive overview of the most widely used cellular autologous blood-derived, bone marrow-derived, and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-based biological therapies, as well as some combinations of these therapies in tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing treatment strategies.

Advertisement

2. Positioning ABPs

Traditionally, health care treatment options consist of a variety of surgical procedures and techniques and the use of medicinal treatment protocols and formulations. Alternatively, regenerative medicine therapies have been introduced, using biological treatment strategies to enhance healing and improve symptoms in many tissues in a large variety of medical conditions [7]. These non-surgical treatment options are referred to as interventional autologous biologically based procedures. In many instances, regenerative medicine procedures result in adequate patient outcomes that are often not achievable via surgeries or the use of medications, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of some characteristics and options of current health care treatment options, including the use of ABPs for tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing as non-surgical interventions therapies. Additionally, ABPs are also used in combination with surgical procedures (Biosurgery) to achieve improved patient outcomes.

ABPs can be safely derived from several freshly acquired biologically derived materials, originating from human blood, bone marrow, or adipose tissue, at point of care [8].

2.1 The biology of tissue repair, tissue regeneration, and wound healing using ABPs

ABPs are live cellular and stromal biomaterials that include a wide variety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow concentrate (BMC), and adipose tissue-derived tissue SVF (tSVF) bioformulations. The foremost advantages of autologous biological products (ABPs) are their autologous nature and their safety profile [9].

Within these specific ABPs, a diversity of bioformulations can be prepared to treat different tissue types and pathologies. An overview of the most cited cells, stroma, bioactive matrix and molecules that play significant roles in non-surgical biological interventional procedures to induce cell-cell communication, cellular and molecular signaling in a treated pathological microenvironment has been published extensively by us [10]. Once precisely delivered, biologics will locally initiate and regulate biological mechanisms and pathways, to interact with the local niche resident cells that potentially lead to tissue repair, tissue regeneration, and wound healing. For these reasons, these multi-cellular heterogeneous cell concentrates have become a valuable biological instrument to treat non-surgically complex pathologies. Furthermore, these preparations are often used to enhance the results of bio-surgical procedures [2, 11].

2.2 The role of ABPs in tissue healing

Autologous biological technologies are designed to mimic the initiation of the classical and angiogenesis healing cascades in a wide-ranging field of medical applications [12]. Ultimately, tissue repair, tissue regeneration, and wound healing are complex biological processes aimed at restoring the integrity and function of damaged tissues. These processes follow well-defined cascades of events, with a magnitude of systemic and local cellular activities taking place in a sequential manner.

The traditional healing cascade can be categorized into distinct phases, each characterized by specific cellular activities. The initial phase involves hemostasis, which is achieved by the aggregation of platelets at the site of tissue injury, promoting blood clotting while forming a fibrinous network. Thereafter, platelets play a crucial role in regulating the healing process by secreting their granular content and releasing a magnitude of platelet growth factors (PGFs), cytokines, and molecules capable of initiating tissue repair [9, 13]. The lesser-known angiogenesis cascade adds an additional layer of complexity to the wound healing process. It may not have been studied as extensively as the traditional wound healing cascade, but it plays an imperative role in wound healing because it involves recruitment of endothelial cells, differentiation, proliferation, and ultimately formation of new blood vessels from preexisting ones (angiogenesis) [14].

Advertisement

3. Outlining ABPs

Many biological treatments options are available to treat various clinical maladies (Figure 2). The preparation of ABPs can be categorized into cellular preparations (such as tSVF, cSVF, or culture expanded cell groups), acellular preparations, or combinations of these methods. Cell-based preparations can be classified into two categories: preparations derived from peripheral whole blood and preparations derived from stromal vascular fraction elements, including mesenchymal, pericytes, endothelial, peri- and paravascular stem cells, originating from bone marrow or adipose tissue. Preparations derived from blood are available in various compositions and characterizations, such as PRP, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), platelet lysates (PL), or as a combined PRP and plasma protein preparation [15, 16].

Figure 2.

A simplified overview of ABPs which are available to treat an abundance of clinical pathologies. In this figure, only autologous prepared products, prepared at point-of-care, and a combination of these products are shown. MSC: mesenchymal stem cell; PRP: platelet-rich plasma; PRF: platelet-rich fibrin; PL: platelet lysate; BM: bone marrow; AT: adipose tissue; P-PRP: pure PRP; NP-PRP: neutrophil-poor PRP; NR-PRP: neutrophil-rich PRP; PRP-G: PRP Gel; i-PRF: injectable platelet-rich fibrin; A-PRF: activated platelet-rich fibrin; L-PRF: leukocyte platelet-rich plasma; PRGF: platelets rich in growth factors; PRFM: platelet-rich fibrin matrix; BMA: bone marrow aspirate; BMAC: bone marrow aspirate concentrate; ATC: adipose tissue complex; cATC: compressed ATC; t-SVF: tissue stromal vascular fraction; c-SVF: cellular stromal vascular fraction; ACS: autologous conditioned serum; A2M: alpha-2-marcoglobulin; PPP-M: platelet-poor plasma matrix; PR-PPP: protein-rich platelet-poor plasma; PR-PRP: protein-rich platelet concentrate.

Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and BMC are frequently cited as autologous MSC and progenitor cell preparations [17, 18]. Adipose tissue-based preparations can be defined as autologous ATC, concentrated ATC, tissue stromal vascular fraction (t-SVF), and cellular stromal vascular fraction (c-SVF) [19, 20].

Acellular preparations consist of (concentrated) plasma proteins and protein fibers, containing a combination of insoluble and soluble molecules. Protein-based technologies are a class of natural biomaterials that can be used either as standalone products (fibrin glue and sealant) or as scaffolds in combination with cellular-based products [21, 22].

3.1 Blood-derived biological preparations

Blood-derived platelet preparations are prepared from a unit of whole blood by centrifugation methods to facilitate gravitational cellular density separation [10]. The final prepared biomaterials are collectively termed autologous platelet concentrates.

The employment of autologous platelet concentrates has been of interest to clinicians and researchers for decades because of their potential to accelerate and support in numerous cellular activities that can lead to tissue repair, tissue regeneration, wound healing, and ultimately functional structural repair. However, contingent on the PRP device used, platelet preparations can contain varying platelet concentrations, as well as differences in bioformulations. It has been suggested the low-quality platelet concentrates, incorporating low platelet numbers and inconsistent other cellular content, are directly responsible for poor patient outcomes [23, 24, 25, 26, 27].

The differences in composition between PRP, plasma-based PRP preparations such as PRF, and blood plasma were described in a proteomic analysis [28]. A total of nearly 600 proteins were detected in human plasma, and an in-depth analysis revealed that PRP formulations contained significantly more proteins than both platelet poor plasma-based PRP products and whole blood plasma.

Although more positive than negative patient outcomes have been reported in the literature, no definitive and accepted standards have been realized for preparing PRP preparation methods and product classifications. A simplified categorization would be to divide platelet concentrates in PRP-buffy coat and plasma-based PRP technologies. The PRP technologies exploit higher patient whole blood volumes to prepare the final PRP products with higher platelet concentrations and preparation options in bioformulation.

Depending on the PRP device architecture, the flexibility to produce different bioformulations, and the employed centrifugation protocols, PRP device uses one spin or two spin centrifugation cycles [29]. Following the PRP manufacturer’s instructions for use, and the practitioner’s desired PRP bioformulation, PRP devices should be able to sequester a unit of freshly anticoagulated whole blood into a clear PPP fraction, a buffy coat stratum, and a red blood cell fraction, as illustrated in Figure 3. Indicatively, these PRP-based systems are capable of capturing platelets after processing that will increase the PRP platelet concentration between five to more than 12 times the baseline whole blood platelet concentration [30].

Figure 3.

An image of PRP preparation after the second centrifugation step. The concentrated platelets are present on the top of the buffy-coat stratum (device in picture is the PurePRP®SP, EmCyte Corporation®, Fort Myers FL, USA). PRP: platelet-rich plasma; PPP: platelet-poor plasma.

Alternatively, plasma-based devices utilize low patient blood volumes to a produce a low volume “PRP-like” product. These systems use mostly a single spin processing protocol designed to mainly isolate the PPP fraction from the whole blood, incorporating platelets that are present in this fraction. Their final platelet concentration ranges from 0.5 to 2.5 times the native platelet concentration [31].

As with PRP, plasma-based products can further be classified into leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) and leukocyte-poor or pure platelet-rich fibrin (P-PRF) [32].

3.1.1 Buffy-coat-based PRP technology is rich in platelets

A variety of PRP bioformulations, terminologies, and product descriptions have been introduced to practitioners over the years [15, 31, 33]. As part of the healing and angiogenesis cascades, platelet biological components and mechanisms are crucial to tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing [14]. In response to administered PRP and the subsequent in situ tissue platelet activation, a number of regenerative and mitogenic components are released, which initiate cell differentiation, proliferation, and metabolic activity [34].

In the absence of consensus on standardization and classification of PRP devices and preparation methods to produce consistent effective PRP formulations, approximately 20 buffy coat PRP devices have been introduced to the market. These PRP devices can be categorized as pure PRP, leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP), or leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) [35]. Considering the vast differences between the architecture of PRP devices, a great deal of variability has been reported on PRP platelet dosing and cellular characterization, which has led to poor and even negative patient outcomes [36].

As a best practice, different PRP formulations should be used at the same time in the same patient to treat multiple pathoanatomic conditions by using tissue-type-specific PRP formulations to optimize microenvironmental healing response and ultimately restore tissue structures that facilitate functional tissue repair [36], as portrayed in Figure 4. In particular, when treating chronic wounds, different PRP formulations should be utilized, based on the wound bed tissue appearances [5].

Figure 4.

A graphic illustration showing the administration of multiple different PRP formulations to treat various pathoanatomic tissue structures in the same patient, during the same session, to optimize total joint healing [36].

3.1.2 Plasma-based PRP technologies are poor in platelets

In plasma-based PRP procedures, a “PRP-like” suspension is prepared, excluding erythrocytes, and in most instances leukocytes [37]. In PRF plasma-based preparations, fibrin is the most important constituent of the final injectate [38]. This blood-derived plasma-based PRP product represents a plasma protein matrix which can contain processed platelets and eventual other cells that have cell stimulatory and immunological properties.

In more specific terms, this ABP consists of a fibrin-matrix compound containing platelets, with or without leukocytes, and other molecules [6, 39]. A notable aspect is that many plasma-based test-tube devices do not use anticoagulants when harvesting patient’s blood prior to processing. It is anticipated that platelet activation will occur, leading to the release of clotting factors, including thrombin that will convert the PPP fibrinogen into a fibrin matrix after processing [40, 41], shown in Figure 5. It has been demonstrated that fibrin polymerization, which is often induced by the addition of calcium chloride, results in a denser fibrin matrix when compared to non-activated PRP [42]. Thus, following therapeutic application, fibrinolysis of the cellular fibrin matrix will be initiated by plasminogen and plasmin, thereby liberating fibrin matrix components for a prolonged period of time compared to activated PRP clots which do not contain excessive amounts of plasma fibrin and other proteins [22].

Figure 5.

Plasma-based test tube preparation (A). After a single centrifugation procedure, the whole blood (10 ml) is segmented and clotted. The clot is extracted from the test tube, and the erythrocyte fraction is separated from the clot, leaving a fibrin matrix for clinical application (B).

In two major device comparison studies, Fadadu and Magalon evaluated many PRP devices, and they concluded that the platelet concentration was significantly lower in the low volume and single spin plasma-based PRP devices, when compared to buffy-coat PRP-based devices [31]. The results of these studies have been confirmed by others who have measured higher PGF concentrations following high preparation volume devices and double spin procedures [43]. Therefore, one might assume that the tissue repair, regeneration, and the wound healing capacities are less in plasma-based devices when compared to buffy-coat PRP systems. A striking observation is that some of the plasma-based platelet rich fibrin (PRF) devices have been presented with more than 20 different sub-formulations and preparation protocols by modifying the centrifugal force, the centrifuge speed, and the processing time [44]. Table 1 summarizes the differences between buffy-coat-based PRP and plasma-based PRP technologies.

Buffy coat-based PRPPlasma-based PRP
Performance and technology features
High volume preparation devices++++
Double spin protocols+++++
Platelet capture rate %+++++
PRP volume range+++++
Platelet dosing strategies++++
Flexibility in bioformulation++++
Sustained release feature++++++
Cellular Features
Platelet growth factor concentrations+++++
Immunomodulatory capacity+++++
Angiogenetic properties+++++
Nociceptive effects++++
Collagen synthesis+++++
Fibroblast proliferation+++++
Leukocyte Control++++
PRP to plasma protein ratio+++++

Table 1.

Differences illustrated between buffy coat-based PRP and plasma-based PRP technologies regarding general device performance characteristics and cellular features of both technologies.

++++: highly feasible; ++: feasible; +: potentially possible; −: not feasible.

3.1.3 Platelet lysate preparations

Platelet lysates (PLs) are prepared following a PRP preparation procedure. As a result of freezing and thawing protocols, the membranes of PRP platelets are mechanically disrupted, allowing growth factors, cytokines, and other granular contents to be released. PLs are more than minimally manipulated ABPs, and they are a source of acellular, platelet-free, biologically active supernatants, which are rich in PGF and cytokines, as well as angiogenic factors. Additionally, as with PRP preparations, any concerns regarding immunogenicity can be dismissed as well [45]. The mechanisms of action of PL are poorly understood, but theoretically, there should be a similar mechanism of action between PL and PRP [46, 47]. Nonetheless, PGFs present in PLs have a short half-life, and they are reported to negatively affect endothelial cell proliferation as well as vascular tube formation in in vitro research [48].

The growth-promoting properties of PLs have been studied in multiple clinical indications, including wounds and soft tissue injuries, as early as the 1980s. A renewed interest in PLs has led to their use in specific musculoskeletal pathologies [49], in part due to their alleged anti-inflammatory properties [50]. Many advocates of PLs assert that their main advantage is that they can be stored in a freezer as well as that they are readily available for subsequent procedures or future applications [51].

Like PRP, there is neither consensus on the preparation of PL protocols nor is there a clear indication for its use, despite some reports citing PL applications in intra-articular procedures and tendinopathies, and in lumbar radiculopathies [50, 52].

Advertisement

4. MSC-based biological preparations

Adult MSCs are undifferentiated multipotent cells that are found in virtually all organs of the human body, and they are known for their self-renewal capacity. Easily accessible tissues to harvest MSCs include the red bone marrow and adipose tissue SVF [5]. In addition to their potential to promote immune modulation, angiogenic activity, anti-inflammatory activity, and anti-apoptotic activity, they also release numerous cytokines and growth factors that confer immunomodulatory, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory effects on many heterogeneous populations of cells [9]. Furthermore, MSCs have the ability to differentiate into various cells of mesodermal origin, including adipocytes, chondrocytes, myocytes, and osteoblasts, when exposed to specific signaling pathways [53].

Density centrifugation techniques are used to concentrate aspirated bone marrow and lipoaspirates to produce bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and tSVF, respectively. Unfortunately, similar to PRP preparations, there is no consensus on classification, preparation standards including validation, and quality controls.

Adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) and BM-MSCs share many biological characteristics [54]. Several studies indicated that MSC transcriptome profiles from AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs showed the highest homology [55]. Although some differences in their immunophenotype, differentiation potential, proteome, and immunomodulatory activities have been reported [56]. Additionally, some clinicians have been reporting on using bone marrow aspirate (BMA) as an ABP, in particular in musculoskeletal pathologies [57].

4.1 Bone marrow aspirate: aspiration and direct injection

Cortical and trabecular bones, cartilage, and connective tissues comprise the bone. The bone marrow tissue, like the peripheral blood, is composed of soft spongy bone, fat-rich marrow, and sinusoidal arterial and venous blood vessels. Bone marrow is a life tissue as it is well recognized as an abundant and heterogeneous source of cells that reside in the trabecular part of long bones and are ultimately, continuously, released into the bloodstream [58].

Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) can be minimally invasive extracted from various anatomical sites using simple bone marrow harvesting needles or more sophisticated bone marrow aspiration systems. The posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) are frequently cited harvesting sites since these sites have the highest MSC concentration among other anatomical sites [59].

BMAs are ABPs with the intent to use an aspirate-collecting device only. In general, a single 10 ml syringe is used to extract bone marrow followed by direct administration of the harvested BMA to pathological treatment locations [57]. Using BMA only is intentionally done to avoid filtration techniques and BMA concentration processing steps, thus avoiding any methods to increase all native cell counts in the treatment specimen [60]. Only few articles have been published in the sports medicine and orthopedic literature regarding BMA applications [61]. Rarely, direct comparisons between BMA and BMAC have been executed and clinical benefits of BMA injections have not been clearly elucidated [60].

4.2 Bone marrow aspirate concentration: BM-MSC preparations

In contrast to BMA treatment vials, BMAC is prepared from a particular harvested volume of BMA, using gravitational density centrifugation processing steps, similar to PRP preparations [62].

BMAC contains concentrated bone marrow MSCs (BM-MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) as well as their multipotent progenitor cells (MPCs), platelets, leukocytes, and myeloid cells. Distinct differences between a BMA and a BMAC treatment specimen is that the latter has significantly more bone marrow cellular concentrations, and platelets when compared to BMA [60]. Importantly, the RBC content in BMAC is significantly lower due to the use of bone marrow tissue fragmentation as a result of centrifugation, decreasing the RBC concentration and thus avoiding all the negative effects related to the presence of native RBCs concentrations [63].

The cellular composition of BMAC is more complex and distinct when compared to PRP, as it contains BM-MSCs and HSCs, each with its own MPCs, which provide distinct reparative functions, other than concentrated PRP.

Prior to BMA harvesting, it is important to recognize that the bone marrow cavity is a well shielded cellular environment consisting of a particular structure and segmented in 4 main regions, niches, according to Lambertsen and Weis [64]. A bone marrow niche is a dynamic and complex environment, defined by its specific cellular content and molecular environment to regulate the function of stem cells and progenitors. Furthermore, the three-dimensional niches contain cells capable of intercellular communications and interactions with the extra cellular matrix (ECM). Cells present in bone marrow niches define stemness and regulate stem cell renewal and quiescence through cell signaling, proliferation, and differentiation [65]. In bone marrow niches, newly formed cells are retained until they mature and are then released into the peripheral circulation [66].

The vast majority of BM-MSCs are found within the endosteal and subendosteal regions of the bone marrow entity [67, 68]. Furthermore, BM-MSCs can be presented as pericytes in the perisinusoidal region [69]. As opposed to BM-MSCs, HSCs are located in the deeper bone marrow regions in the perivascular and perisinusoidal regions, and in the megakaryocyte niches. Most niche-specific processes are regulated by complex biochemical and mechanical signaling processes, followed by direct cell-to-cell interactions with platelet-derived chemokines, stem cell factors, and transforming growth factor [70].

BM-MSCs induce the production of cell-specific antigens, and their progenitors may differentiate into cells of the mesodermal lineage including osteoblasts, chondrocytes, tenocytes, endothelial cells, myocytes, fibroblasts, nerves, and adipocytes [71]. The differentiation of HSCs and progenitor cells into specialized blood cells plays a vital role in hemostasis, homeostatic mechanisms, and wound healing and angiogenesis in indirect ways [4]. Due to these reasons, BMAC has been regarded as an effective ABP to treat numerous clinical pathologies by altering local microenvironmental conditions through immunomodulatory activities, angiogenesis, and tissue repair.

4.3 Adipose tSVF based preparations

Adipose tissue preparations have been successfully used in minimally invasive reconstructive procedures and in guided injections into damaged, degenerative, or non-healing wounds. The rational to use tSVF is that it is a heterogeneous ABP, highly vascularized and stable connective tissue due to cell-to-cell or cell-to-matrix connections which are considered a pre-requisite for such stem cells to open the cellular send and receive signaling [72]. ATC, with its important bioactive scaffolding capabilities should therefore be recognized as a multifaceted microvascular organ, or better as an ATC, in the form of lipoaspirates, consisting of various cellular tissue components, including AD-MSCs [73], Furthermore, concentrated and compressed tSVF provides a physiological multicellular scaffold containing AD-MSCs along with other stromal vascular cells [19]. Minimally invasive access techniques are employed to harvest from several subcutaneous fat deposits, including the abdomen, perigluteal, thigh, and flank areas. During the procedure, a subcutaneous injection of a dilute local anesthetic solution (tumescent) is administered to numb the area of adipose harvesting and facilitate the creation of a tSVF suspension [74]. After a brief waiting period, a blunt-tipped atraumatic aspiration cannula is introduced through a small puncture or incision in the skin and attached to a syringe for manually controlled, low negative pressure, lipoaspiration [75]. A correctly performed lipoaspiration procedure preserves the neurovascular structures at the donor site with a minimal level of discomfort for the patient [76]. Furthermore, the cell yield and viability of AD-MSCs should not be affected by liposuction techniques [77, 78].

Harvested tSVF can be transferred to a syringe or adipose processing device and centrifugated. Centrifugation methods have proven to be an effective means to safely wash, rinse, eliminate the infranatant-extracellular fluid, separate free lipids, and residual oil, to prepare a clean, compressed tSVF specimen [79], as illustrated in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

An illustration following adipose tissue centrifugation to access tSVF (A). After centrifugation, first the residual oil (B) and then the infranatant solution (C) are removed, thereafter the tSVF is extracted (D). (Device shown in the picture is the Progenikine® Adipose Concentration System EmCyte Corporation®, Fort Myers FL, USA).

Following lipoaspirate centrifugation, isolation of tSVF-based preparations can be accessed, consisting of cellular and matrix components derived from adipose tissue and are used in advanced regenerative medicine procedures. The SVF is a complex mixture of various cell types including endothelial cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, and a significant population of AD-MSCs. These cells are embedded in a network of collagen fibers and other extracellular matrix components, which together contribute to the regenerative properties of the SVF.

Prior to regenerative applications, various SVF preparation protocols are obtainable to prepare either fully emulsified nanofat in small aggregates (tSVF) or cSVF [80]. cSVF preparation methods are based on enzymatic digestion techniques using collagenase [81]. tSVF preparations are created by mechanical emulsification, reducing the size of macrofat to either partially or fully emulsified aggregates, known as micronized fat or nanofat (Figure 7) [80]. Importantly, the fully emulsified, sized tSVF aggregates present an intact microenvironment, whereby the fully emulsified small nanofat aggregates essentially are devoid of adult adipocytes. Generally, nanofat tSVF preparations are considered the most potent valuable form of tSVF for regenerative and wound healing purposes.

Figure 7.

Mechanical emulsification systems. In A, “partial emulsification” is realized by shifting the syringes back and forward through restraining female-female luer connectors to create micronized tSVF. In B, the micronized tSVF is ready for application. In C, adipose tissue is pushed through a 600/400micron screen, creating nanofat tSVF (devices shown are in A the Adicen™, a three phase micro-fragmentation accessory with 2.4, 1.4, and 1.2 mm emulsification sizes, EmCyte Corporation®, Fort Myers FL, USA. In C, the disposable Nanofat™ device is displayed, Tulip® Medical, San Diego CA, USA).

4.3.1 Multicellular SVF components

The presence of SVF-based cells can be tested by enzymatic means and measured by advanced laboratory flow cytometry techniques. The typical, heterogenous cell distribution and the cellular ranges in SVF are shown in Table 2 [82].

Stromal Cells:15–30%AD-MSC
Pre-adipocytes
Fibroblast
Stem cell and progenitors< 0.1%
Hematopoietic cell linages:Platelets
Erythrocyte
Lymphocyte
Neutrophil
Monocyte – macrophage
Pericytes3–5%
Endothelial cells10–20%

Table 2.

Overview of identified multicellular components in SVF.

AD-MSCs are the most prominent stem cells in tSVF. They have the capability to differentiate into various cell types, including osteoblasts, adipocytes, chondrocytes tenocytes, and myocytes. Many researchers and clinicians believe that pericyte stem cells (PSC) are ubiquitous cells, representing the original “stem” cell originator [83] and are fully capable of all the functions of the MSCs. PSCs are located on the walls of capillaries, the perivascular/paravascular locations, and work intimately with the endothelial and intra-adventitial cells. Furthermore, PCS stabilize blood vessels and have the potential to differentiate into other cell types, contributing to tissue regeneration and repair. Endothelial cells can line blood vessels and play key roles in forming new blood vessels through angiogenesis. Immune cells, originating from hematopoietic cell linages (e.g., monocytes, lymphocytes, and various macrophage phenotypes) are involved in modulating the immune response. Lastly, fibroblasts are present in SVF and they are recognized for producing collagen and an extracellular matrix, providing structural support to tissues and they hold crucial roles in wound closure and the strength of the healed tissues [84].

Freshly prepared SVF can be directly administered to the patient without the need for cell expansion techniques or additional cell separation preparations. Unlike cSVF, emulsified tSVF is not solely a 100% cellular product, as it contains both cellular fragments and important native adipose structural ECM components) [80, 85, 86]. Following tSVF preparation, the product is ready for injection. An advantage of tSVF compared to cSVF is that it offers the ability to provide a bioactive cellular tissue matrix that can be delivered to pathoanatomic treatment sites. In fact, following tSVF application, stromal supportive cells in their microenvironment are being transferred to recipient sites where these stromal elements start cell-cell communication and cell signaling [87].

4.3.2 The role of tSVF in wound healing, repair, and regenerative therapies

The application of tSVF in wound healing and regenerative therapies are based on its rich content of regenerative cells and factors. tSVF cells are capable of differentiation, cell-to-cell communication (paracrine, sending/receiving when attached, and may secrete ECM, and provide key elements in the response to damaged or degenerative cells [73]. tSVF aids in the promotion of angiogenesis as endothelial cells and growth factors promote the formation of new blood vessels, enhancing oxygen and nutrient supply to the wound or damaged tissue, thereby supporting healing [88]. Immune cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines present in tSVF support in modulating the body’s immune response to reduce chronic inflammation while promoting a more conducive environment for tissue repair. Following tSVF preparation, the AD-MSCs can self-replicate and they are capable of differentiating into various cell types, secrete growth factors, help with creation of biologically active ECM, and may provide mesodermal, ectodermal, neuroectodermal cells that contribute and stimulate tissue regeneration [89]. This is particularly valuable in tissue repair and regeneration. Finally, fibroblasts contribute to the synthesis of collagen and other extracellular matrix components, essential for the structural integrity and function of repaired tissues [90].

Advertisement

5. Combined ABPs

PRP, BMAC, and tSVF are ABPs that contribute to immunomodulation, painkilling, wound healing, and functional tissue restoration with different intensities and distinctly different pathways.

Many studies have reported on the beneficial effects of PRP and MSC-based preparations for the treatment of acute cutaneous and chronic wounds, degenerative tissues, and burns [91, 92]. Some of the therapeutic effects of PRP are recognized by the release of the platelet granular content, following in-situ platelet activation [10]. Platelet have been found, among other activities, to stimulate fibroblast proliferation and differentiation and incite endothelial cellular pathways regarding angiogenesis and ECM secretion to regulate tissue inflammation [93]. In addition, following platelet activation, the PRP fibrin network provides an autologous cellular scaffold [6].

Individually, BM-MSCs and AD-MSCs have demonstrated their cellular differentiation potential and immunomodulatory effects. Not many studies have addressed the combination of both MSCs, but they are routinely being performed in regenerative medicine center. Wardner et al. concluded that the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was more suppressed by AD-MSCs, however, combining them with BM-MSCs resulted in highly efficient immunomodulation, with significant responder cell suppression in a dose dependent manner, possibly reducing the inflammatory effects when BMAC is used as a stand-alone product [94].

The delivery of MSCs exert tissue repair effects primarily through the release of a wide range of soluble factors, growth factors, cytokines, and exosomes capable of proangiogenic and anti-inflammatory performances [95, 96, 97]. In contrast to PRP, both BM-MSCs and AD-MSCs can modify their cellular secretome according to the local microenvironment in which they have been injected or applied and maintain cell-signaling to neighboring cells for several days [98].

Based on the typical PRP, MSC, and plasma protein characteristics, it was suggested that potentially positive synergistically effects may occur if PRP is combined with BM and AD-MSC preparations. Additionally, PRP effects might be extended over a longer period of time when mixed with plasma protein concentrates and consolidated as one ABP [99].

5.1 Protein rich-platelet rich plasma (PR-PRP): concentrated platelet poor plasma mixed with PRP

PRP buffy-coat preparations are created by gravitational density separation that sequesters a unit of blood into three main fractions: a PPP fraction, a buffy coat stratum rich in platelets, and a RBC fraction. Normally, as part of the PRP preparation process, the PPP fraction is discarded after the platelet concentrate has been extracted from the PRP device.

One of the less well known, but equally important features of PPP is the presence of exosomes and other macrovesicles [100, 101]. They are considered to be important in cell-cell communication and cell signaling. Furthermore, some GF are not present in the platelet alpha granules, but instead, they reside in higher concentrations in the PPP fraction, outside of platelets. In particular insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF).

In addition to their roles as angiogenesis activators, these plasma-based GFs are also known to promote keratinocyte migration and wound healing. Interestingly, Beitia et al. found a significant correlation between IGF-1 concentrations and cell proliferation [102]. Moreover, it has been shown that both IGF-1 and HGF can inhibit inflammation and fibrosis.

Technology advancements in ABPs have led to the development of more advanced biological processing methods and devices. By using new ultrafiltration technologies, it is possible to concentrate PPP, at point-of-care, in a fast and efficient manner producing a viable and viscous protein concentrate [103].

Microfiltration and ultrafiltration devices are made of high-performance medical grade polymers and offer an excellent biocompatibility and present a consistent performance eliminating plasma water. They have been used widely as blood-plasma contact devices in blood apheresis for decades [104]. Later, modified ultrafiltration techniques were successfully developed to alleviate systemic inflammatory responses caused by cytokines [105].

Currently, ultrafiltration techniques can incorporate PPP processing methods. The PPP fluid fraction is manually transported by syringes, exerting a positive transmembrane pressure, through the microporous membranes of the ultrafiltration device fibers. Once the PPP volume has frequently passed the ultrafiltration device, plasma water, cytokines, molecules, and plasma proteins with a molecular mass (weight), less than the pore size of the fibers, are all filtered out of the ultrafiltration device. This waste solution is collected in an effluent syringe, as demonstrated in Figure 8.

Figure 8.

The platelet-poor plasma (PPP) syringes are manually “pushed” through the ultrafiltration device (A). Plasma water, small proteins, and cytokines are eliminated through the filter membrane pores and captured in the effluent syringe. After a series of passes, the PPP volume is significantly reduced to a high viscous protein rich PPP volume, as shown in B. Note the clear visual difference between the unprocessed PPP and the final viscous protein rich PPP (the ultrafiltration device presented is the CORE™ Ultrafiltration System, developed by EmCyte Corporation®, Fort Myers FL, USA).

Reducing the PPP water component will result in a significant increase in the concentration of, functional, total proteins, like fibrinogen, albumen, and alpha-2-macroglobulin. Moreover, plasma levels of IGF-1 and HGF are also significantly higher after ultrafiltration when compared to their levels in the native PPP fraction before the filtration process [106]. Effectively, larger non-concentrated PPP volumes will be reduced to low volume protein rich PPP, up to 10-fold reductions can be achieved.

Recently, EmCyte Corporation® has introduced the concept of CORE™ protein rich platelet concentrate formulation. This consolidated ABP, combining a high concentration of PRP platelets with a high concentration of plasma proteins (Figure 9), has distinctive scaffolding features, protease inhibitor, and regenerative capabilities when compared with other similar ABPs on the market.

Figure 9.

PR-PRP preparation. A low volume of protein rich PPP (left syringe) is cautiously mixed with the same volume of highly concentrated PRP (right syringe) creating PR-PRP, at a ratio of 1:1. Before application, the consolidated volume is gently agitated to produce a uniform ABP treatment specimen. Abbreviations: PRP: platelet-rich plasma; PPP: platelet-poor plasma; PR-PRP: protein-rich platelet concentrate; ABP: autologous biological preparation.

The creation and ultimate delivery of PR-PRP in tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing procedures can be considered as a novel and powerful therapeutic.

Depending on the bioformulation of the prepared PRP, the PR-PRP scaffold retains and facilitates interactions between a variety of concentrated heterogeneous PRP components and molecules: activated and non-activated platelets, PGFs, dense platelet granular elements, plasma-based IGF and HGF, cytokines, plasma proteins, exosomes, and eventually leukocytes [107], as presented in Figure 10.

Figure 10.

A graphic illustration of a PR-PRP scaffold with the retained platelets, and leukocytes. Interactions between tissue plasminogen (tPA) and plasminogen (PA) binding to the scaffold with the subsequent production of plasmin (P) to accomplish fibrinolysis, leading to fibrinolysis with the release of the retained PR-PRP elements. Abbreviations: tPA: tissue plasminogen; PA: plasminogen; P: plasmin.

The use of PR-PRP preparations in non-surgical interventional procedures in musculoskeletal pathologies includes, among others, intra-articular injections in patients with OA, and patients with partial of full-thickness tendon tears. In OA, the PR-PRP specific protein alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M), a macro protein molecule known to function as a broad-spectrum protease inhibitor, traps active joint proteases into the A2M typical molecular cage and subsequently eliminates them from the joint space [108]. In patients with partial or full thickness tendon and ligament tears, the PR-PRP proteins fibrinogen and albumen function as a biological active tissue scaffold, capable of filling tissue voids [109, 110]. Additionally, the scaffold facilitates a sustained platelet release of PGFs, cytokines, molecules, and eventual leukocytes, stimulating the local environment for a longer period to regulate inflammation, immunomodulation, and extend the tissue repair processes.

In chronic wound care management, autologously prepared PR-PRP grafts have been used as biological wound dressings [5, 111]. The wound healing process is meticulously controlled by various cytokines and growth factors that are secreted to the wound area [112], with platelets holding pivotal roles in wound healing by platelet plug formation, PGF release and the initiation of the angiogenesis cascade [14]. Platelets in PR-PRP matrix serve as vital scaffolds where platelets release PGF, cytokines, molecules, and other granular content that facilitate wound closure by acting as chemotactic cues to inflammatory cells and stimulate angiogenesis. In the protein matrix, the presence of thrombin facilitates platelet degranulation with the subsequent release of platelet content. Furthermore, concentrated plasma proteins such as thrombospondin, vitronectin, and fibronectin are important in cell adhesion and cell migration in the wound healing cascade [113]. Ultimately, these processes can result in wound re-epithelialization and wound contractions of connective tissue. PR-PRP can either be injected in wound tissue structures, or it can be prepared and activated in a petri-dish and applied as a biological wound dressing to open chronic wounds, as demonstrated in Figure 11 [114].

Figure 11.

Different PR-PRP application modalities can be prepared to treat, open, chronic wounds. In A, a leukocyte-rich PR-PRP is administered as a topical and liquid ABP to a chronic leg ulcer. In B, a leukocyte-poor PR-PRP is prepared in a petri-dish as a solid biological graft which can be applied to chronic wounds as an autologous biological wound dressing.

PR-PRP spray applications can be effectively used during surgical interventions, referred to as biosurgery, to support in post-operative wound healing (Figure 12). Specifically, the combination of PRP characteristics with protein rich fibrin scaffolding in a variety of biosurgical procedures, are effective in reducing dehiscent wounds, lowering infection rates, reducing scarring, as well as reducing seromata formation, thus improving overall patient outcomes [2, 3, 115, 116, 117, 118].

Figure 12.

An illustration of PR-PRP applications in orthopedic (A) (total knee replacement) and plastic reconstructive (B) (lower body lift) biosurgical procedures. A dual syringe spray applicator is used to deliver the combined PR-PRP preparation and mix it with thrombin to support in post-surgical wound healing. Both, leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor PRP formulations can be combined with the protein concentrate. Abbreviations: PR-PRP: protein rich platelet concentrate; LP-PRP: leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma; LR-PRP: leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma.

After the PR-PRP scaffold has been delivered to tissue sites, the protein scaffold will start to breakdown due to the interaction of tissue plasminogen (tPA) with the inactive enzyme plasminogen (PA). Subsequently, PA will bind to the PR-PRP and will release the catalytically active nonspecific protease plasmin [119]. The proteolytic plasmin initiates plasma hydrolysis of cross-linked fibrin polymers within the scaffold [120]. In response, the PR-PRP scaffold will undergo a fibrinolytic breakdown (fibrinolysis), thereby releasing the cells that have been retained in the PR-PRP scaffold. A sustained release of concentrated cells and molecules in the PR-PRP scaffold over a longer period will transpire until the entire scaffold has been dissolved following fibrinolysis.

Future studies have to elucidate that this biologically created, sustained release-based, microenvironment holds an important role in tissue regeneration, immunomodulation, and ultimately functional tissue repair.

5.2 PRP and BMAC combined

Several studies have been indicating positive effects of combining PRP and BMAC as one consolidated ABP [121, 122, 123, 124], although cellular and cytokine characterization revealed overlapping data [125]. While interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA), a potent natural anti-inflammatory cytokine, was significantly increased in BMAC when compared to PRP [126]. Combining PRP and BMAC may create a more biologically active graft, projected to optimize tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing treatment outcomes as concentrated MSCs and HSCs are added to the PRP cellular components, including significantly more anti-inflammatory activity due to higher concentrations of IL-1RA (Figure 13). An analysis concluded that PRP stimulates BM-MSC proliferation and preserves MSC multipotency, as the interactions between PRP and MSCs did not affect multilineage cell differentiation [99]. Additionally, PRP had a positive effect on MSC senescent activities. In an in vivo ACL study, the combined stimulatory effects of PRP and MSCs demonstrated improved MSC proliferation, cellular growth, and ligament integrity [127].

Figure 13.

A graphical comparison between leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) (A) and BMAC (B) cell distributions. When consolidating LR-PRP with BMAC, this ABP is characterized by high concentrations of platelets, BM-MSCs, and BM-HSCs. Noteworthy, the plasma color of the BMAC preparation is more orange than the yellow appearance of the LR-PRP preparation. This typical colorization aspect of a BMAC preparation is related to the higher shear forces employed when extracting bone marrow to liberate the BM-MSCs from their specific niches. Abbreviations: PRP: platelet-rich plasma; HSCs: hematopoietic stem cells; BM-MSCs: bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; BMAC: bone marrow aspirate concentrate.

According to a review, citing 57 articles, studies using PRP showed a reduction in the time necessary to double the number of BM-MSCs [99]. A further study showed that MSCs cultured with PRP instead of fetal bovine serum altered the secretion of cytokines by T lymphocytes, B cells, and natural killer cells, demonstrating significant anti-inflammatory activities. In an animal study, the combination of PRP and BM-MSCs demonstrated an increase in the maturation of trabecular bone along with an increase in collagen type II expression and differentiation to chondrogenesis [128].

Improved VAS and functional scores were observed following combined PRP-BMAC injections in patients with partial rotator cuff tears, when compared to control patients [124]. It was thought that the PRP-BMAC consolidated biologic was responsible for the associated pain killing effects by downregulating various inflammatory mediators [127, 129].

PRP-BMAC complexes have revealed that PGFs and other platelet cytokines are influential in the BMAC reparative initiated processes as they stimulate multiple paracrine BM-MSC trophic effects, including endogenous tissue repair, while decreasing cell apoptosis expressing and releasing higher concentrations of therapeutic affecters [124, 125]. Additionally, a decrease in cell apoptosis and inflammation has been reported. Besides, combining PRP and concentrated BM-MSCs with a demineralized bone matrix (DBM) guaranteed the consistent release of high PGFs over time in an in-vitro model [130]. It was postulated that the clinical application of a PRP-BMAC graft in a bone matrix will allow for better healing in compromised tendons [98]. In another study, the response of BM-MSCs was measured in healthy human tendons, DBM, and a fibrin scaffold. MSC stromal cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation assays indicated differences in cellular activity among the three different scaffolds. However, when PRP was added to the BM-MSCs, enhanced cellular function was observed in all three scaffolds, indicating significant synergistic effects by the combined PRP-BMAC biological preparation [131].

5.3 PRP and tSVF combined

The effectiveness of PRP and SVF modalities as biological treatment options for a variety of pathological conditions has been studied in numerous clinical trials.

Recently, compounding PRP and tSVF as a combined ABP (Figure 14) have been used by practitioners in mainly esthetic and plastic reconstructive surgical procedures, and to treat patients with non-healing chronic wounds. The rationale behind this combination is to increase the survival rate of fat grafts, to decrease inflammation, and ultimately improve long term fat grafting outcomes [133, 134].

Figure 14.

In A, LR-PRP is mixed with processed tSVF to create a compounded ABP. In A, the less dense adipose tissue is mixed with the denser PRP, insinuating that proper agitation is required to create homogenously mixed graft prior to application [132]. Ideally, multiples smaller application syringes (B) are prepared after mixing both the PRP and compressed tSVF volumes to ensure proper distribution of the PRP-cATC graft, targeting for significant synergistic therapeutic effects. Abbreviations: LR-PRP: leukocyte-rich platelet rich plasma; cATC: compressed adipose tissue complex.

PRP combined with AD-MSCs was shown to significantly stimulate tissue vascularization in wounds as compared to PRP or AD-MSCs alone [135]. Similar findings were reported by others [136, 137]. According to their findings, PRP stimulates the angiogenic potential of AD-MSCs by activating the MSC secretome directly, which results in a stimulation of the VEGF and SDF-1 synthesis, thereby improving blood vessel formation and endothelial cell migration. Others observed a synergistic effect between tSVF and the PRP induced fibrin matrix, with regard to the secretion of high VEGF concentrations [138]. Another important finding was that PRP promoted the proliferation of AD-MSCs via various pathways [139]. Furthermore, van Dongen et al. concluded that the combination of PRP growth factors and the mechanically dissociated, emulsified ATC (tSVF) are proficient in parenchymal cell proliferation, and immunomodulation [140].

Intriguingly, PRP combined with AD-MSCs increased mitochondrial respiration and oxygen consumption, resulting in an increase in ATP production. The addition of PRP to AD-MSCs increased the AD-MSC metabolism and fat graft vascularization, ultimately resulting in improved fat graft survival and stimulation of the recipient tissue site [134]. Importantly, when PRP was mixed with adipose grafts, a reduction in inflammatory reactions, as well as a reduction in fat necrosis percentage was observed [141, 142, 143]. Synergistic cellular and GF specific effects, after mixing PRP with an adipose tissue graft, are presented in Table 3.

VascularizationProliferation
Osteoblasts
Proliferation FibroblastsECM
Synthesis
Chemotaxis
PDGF*+++++++/−
TGF*+/−+/−+++
VEGF++*+
CTGF+++/−+++
IGF+++++++
Fibrin++++

Table 3.

The synergistical and contributing dynamics of specific PRP growth factors and plasma-fibrin fraction to adipose tissue grafting cellular processes.

*: indirect effect; +: increased; ++: highly increased; −: no effect [136, 144, 145, 146, 147].

Abbreviations: ECM: extra-cellular matrix; PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor; TGF: transforming growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; CTCG: connective tissue growth factor; IGF: insulin-like growth factor.

It is important to note that after mixing lipoaspirate formulations with PRP, a PRP-tSVF-fibrin scaffold will develop as a combined product. This scaffold serves as a cellular matrix and retains adipocytes, AD-MSCs, PGFs, cytokines, and other proteins for an extended period of time, serving as a sustained, extended-release medication [148]. In addition, it has been shown that the PRP-tSVF-fibrin scaffold inhibits apoptosis of adipocytes [149].

Despite some initial positive reports in chronic wound healing models [147], additional clinical research is needed to develop more synergistic formulations of ABPs and application strategies for the treatment of degenerative conditions, poorly healing chronic wounds, as well as to support in patient outcomes following biosurgical procedures.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

ABPs, prepared with modern and dedicated devices and ultimately precisely delivered, are powerful high yielded cellular biological products.

The employment of properly prepared stand-alone or combined biologics is a valuable and safe therapy for clinicians to repair and regenerate tissues, aiming for functional restoration. Furthermore, they can be used as supportive armamentarium in wound healing treatments and biosurgical procedures to improve patient outcomes and decrease complications, as evidenced by an extensive body of clinical literature.

Lastly, we believe that more clinical and translational studies, as well as educational activities, are required in order for ABPs to be widely accepted as mainstream therapeutics.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Wright DE, Wagers AJ, Gulati AP, Johnson FL, Weissman IL. Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Science. 2001;294(5548):1933-1936
  2. 2. Everts PAM, Devilee RJJ, Oosterbos CJM, Mahoney CB, Schattenkerk ME, Knape JTA, et al. Autologous platelet gel and fibrin sealant enhance the efficacy of total knee arthroplasty: Improved range of motion, decreased length of stay and a reduced incidence of arthrofibrosis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy [Internet]. 2007;15(7):888-894. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0296-x
  3. 3. Poodt IGM, Van Dijk MM, Klein S, Hoogbergen MM. Complications of lower body lift surgery in postbariatric patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open [Internet]. 2016;4(9):e1030. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/01720096-201609000-00001
  4. 4. Calvi LM, Link DC. The hematopoietic stem cell niche in homeostasis and disease. Blood [Internet]. 2015;126(22):2443-2451. Available from: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/126/22/2443/34611/The-hematopoietic-stem-cell-niche-in-homeostasis
  5. 5. Everts PA. Autologous platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of chronic wounds. In: Hakan Dogan K, editor. Wound Healing - Current Perspectives [Internet]. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2019. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/wound-healing-current-perspectives/autologous-platelet-rich-plasma-and-mesenchymal-stem-cells-for-the-treatment-of-chronic-wounds
  6. 6. Lana JF, Purita J, Everts PA, De Mendonça Neto PAT, De Moraes Ferreira Jorge D, Mosaner T, et al. Platelet-rich plasma power-mix gel (ppm)—An orthobiologic optimization protocol rich in growth factors and fibrin. Gels [Internet]. 2023;9(7):553. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2310-2861/9/7/553
  7. 7. Yamaguchi S, Silva S. PRP and BMAC for musculoskeletal conditions via biomaterial carriers. IJMS [Internet]. 2019;20(21):5328. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/21/5328
  8. 8. Everts PA, Flanagan G, Podesta L. Autologous Orthobiologics. In: Mostoufi SA, George TK, Tria AJ Jr, editors. Clinical Guide to Musculoskeletal Medicine: A Multidisciplinary Approach [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. pp. 651-679. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92042-5_62
  9. 9. Everts PA, Panero AJ. Basic science of autologous orthobiologics. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America [Internet]. 2023;34(1):25-47. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1047965122000730
  10. 10. Everts P, Onishi K, Jayaram P, Lana JF, Mautner and K. Plateletrich plasma: New performance understandings and therapeutic considerations in 2020. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21:7794. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207794
  11. 11. Hasiba-Pappas SK, Tuca AC, Luze H, Nischwitz SP, Zrim R, Geißler JCJ, et al. Platelet-rich plasma in plastic surgery: A systematic review. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy [Internet]. 2022;49(3):129-142. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/524353
  12. 12. Andia I, Maffulli N. A contemporary view of platelet-rich plasma therapies: Moving toward refined clinical protocols and precise indications. Regenerative Medicine [Internet]. 2018;13(6):717-728. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2018-0042
  13. 13. Zheng C, Zhu Q , Liu X, Huang X, He C, Jiang L, et al. Effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) concentration on proliferation, neurotrophic function and migration of Schwann cells in vitro: Effect of platelet-rich plasma on Schwann cells. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine [Internet]. 2016;10(5):428-436. DOI: 10.1002/term.1756
  14. 14. Everts PA, Lana JF, Onishi K, Buford D, Peng J, Mahmood A, et al. Angiogenesis and tissue repair depend on platelet dosing and bioformulation strategies following orthobiological platelet-rich plasma procedures: A narrative. Review. Biomedicines. 2023;11:1922. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11071922
  15. 15. Lana JFSD, Purita J, Paulus C, Huber SC, Rodrigues BL, Rodrigues AA, et al. Contributions for classification of platelet rich plasma – Proposal of a new classification: MARSPILL. Regenerative Medicine [Internet]. 2017;12(5):565-574. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0042
  16. 16. Acebes-Huerta A, Arias-Fernández T, Bernardo Á, Muñoz-Turrillas MC, Fernández-Fuertes J, Seghatchian J, et al. Platelet-derived bio-products: Classification update, applications, concerns and new perspectives. Transfusion and Apheresis Science [Internet]. 2020;59(1):102716. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1473050219302897
  17. 17. Arthur A, Gronthos S. Clinical application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells to repair skeletal tissue. IJMS [Internet]. 2020;21(24):9759. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/24/9759
  18. 18. PintoreA, Notarfrancesco D, Zar A, Oliviero A, Migliorini F, Oliva F, et al. Intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate conncentrate (BMAC) or adiposederived stemcells (ADSCs) for knee osteoarthritis: A prospective comparative clinical trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023;18:350. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03841-2
  19. 19. Alexander RW. Understanding mechanical emulsification (Nanofat) versus enzymatic isolation of tissue stromal vascular fraction (tSVF) cells from adipose tissue: Potential uses in biocellular regenerative medicine. Journal of Prolotherapy. 2016;8:e947-e960
  20. 20. Zuk PA. The adipose-derived stem cell: Looking Back and looking ahead. MBoC. 2010;21(11):1783-1787. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e09-07-0589
  21. 21. Hadjipanayi E, Kuhn PH, Moog P, Bauer AT, Kuekrek H, Mirzoyan L, et al. The fibrin matrix regulates angiogenic responses within the hemostatic microenvironment through biochemical control. PLoS One [Internet]. 2015;10(8):e0135618. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135618
  22. 22. Pavlovic V, Ciric M, Jovanovic V, Stojanovic P. Platelet rich plasma: A short overview of certain bioactive components. Open Medicine [Internet]. 2016;11(1):242-247. DOI: 10.1515/med-2016-0048
  23. 23. Rodeo SA, Delos D, Williams RJ, Adler RS, Pearle A, Warren RF. The effect of platelet-rich fibrin matrix on rotator cuff tendon healing: A prospective, randomized clinical study. The American Journal of Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2012;40(6):1234-1241. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512442924
  24. 24. Linnanmäki L, Kanto K, Karjalainen T, Leppänen OV, Lehtinen J. Platelet-rich plasma or autologous blood do not reduce pain or improve function in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research [Internet]. 2020;478(8):1892-1900. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001185
  25. 25. Longo UG, Castricini R, De Benedetto M, Panfoli N, Pirani P, Zini R, et al. Paper # 117: Platelet-rich fibrin matrix augmentation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery [Internet]. 2011;27(10):e145-e146. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749806311008279
  26. 26. Bennell KL, Paterson KL, Metcalf BR, Duong V, Eyles J, Kasza J, et al. Effect of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma vs placebo injection on pain and medial tibial cartilage volume in patients with knee osteoarthritis: The RESTORE randomized clinical trial. JAMA [Internet]. 2021;326(20):2021. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2786501
  27. 27. Atiyeh B, Oneisi A, Ghieh F. Platelet-rich plasma facial rejuvenation: Myth or reality? Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2021;45(6):2928-2938. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02300-9
  28. 28. Miroshnychenko O, Chalkley RJ, Leib RD, Everts PA, Dragoo JL. Proteomic analysis of platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma. Regenerative Therapy [Internet]. 2020;15:226-235. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352320420300730
  29. 29. Ozer K, Kankaya Y, Colak O, Kocer U. The impact of duration and force of centrifugation on platelet content and mass in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery [Internet]. 2019;43(4):1078-1084. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-019-01375-9
  30. 30. Magalon J, Brandin T, Francois P, Degioanni C, De Maria L, Grimaud F, et al. Technical and biological review of authorized medical devices for platelets-rich plasma preparation in the field of regenerative medicine. Platelets [Internet]. 2021;32(2):200-208. DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1832653
  31. 31. Fadadu PP, Mazzola AJ, Hunter CW, Davis TT. Review of concentration yields in commercially available platelet-rich plasma (PRP) systems: A call for PRP standardization. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine [Internet]. 2019;44(6):652-659. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100356
  32. 32. Pietruszka P, Chruścicka I, Duś-Ilnicka I, Paradowska-Stolarz A. PRP and PRF—Subgroups and divisions when used in dentistry. JPM [Internet]. 2021;11(10):944. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/10/944
  33. 33. Chahla J, Cinque ME, Piuzzi NS, Mannava S, Geeslin AG, Murray IR, et al. A call for standardization in platelet-rich plasma preparation protocols and composition reporting: A systematic review of the clinical orthopaedic literature. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Internet]. 2017;99(20):1769-1779. Available from: http://Insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00004623-201710180-00009
  34. 34. Parrish WR. Physiology of blood components in wound healing: An appreciation of cellular co-operativity in platelet rich plasma action. JESO [Internet]. 2017;4(2):1-14. Available from: https://symbiosisonlinepublishing.com/exercise-sports-orthopedics/exercise-sports-orthopedics56.php
  35. 35. Giannotti L, Di Chiara SB, Spedicato F, Nitti P, Damiano F, Demitri C, et al. Progress in regenerative medicine: Exploring autologous platelet concentrates and their clinical applications. Genes [Internet]. 2023;14(9):1669. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/14/9/1669
  36. 36. Everts PA, Mazzola T, Mautner K, Randelli PS, Podesta L. Modifying orthobiological PRP therapies are imperative for the advancement of treatment outcomes in musculoskeletal pathologies. Biomedicine [Internet]. 2022;10(11):2933. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/10/11/2933
  37. 37. Piao L, Park H, Jo CH. Theoretical prediction and validation of cell recovery rates in preparing platelet-rich plasma through a centrifugation. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017;12(11):e0187509. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187509
  38. 38. Saluja H, Dehane V, Mahindra U. Platelet-rich fibrin: A second generation platelet concentrate and a new friend of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2011;1(1):53. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.83158
  39. 39. Zumstein AM, Berger S, Schober M, Boileau P, Nyffeler WR, Horn M, et al. Leukocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) for long-term delivery of growth factor in rotator cuff repair: Review, preliminary results and future directions. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2012;13(7):1196-1206
  40. 40. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJ, Mouhyi J, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: Technological concepts and evolution. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2006;101(3):e37-e44
  41. 41. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJ, Mouhyi J, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate. Part II: Platelet-related biologic features. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2006;101(3):e45-e50
  42. 42. Matveeva VG, Senokosova EA, Sevostianova VV, Khanova MY, Glushkova TV, Akentieva TN, et al. Advantages of fibrin polymerization method without the use of exogenous thrombin for vascular tissue engineering applications. Biomedicine [Internet]. 2022;10(4):789. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/10/4/789
  43. 43. Oh JH, Kim W, Park KU, Roh YH. Comparison of the cellular composition and cytokine-release kinetics of various platelet-rich plasma preparations. The American Journal of Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2015;43(12):3062-3070. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515608481
  44. 44. Miron RJ, Chai J, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Sculean A, Zhang Y. Evaluation of 24 protocols for the production of platelet-rich fibrin. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2020;20(1):310. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01299-w
  45. 45. Da Fonseca L, Santos GS, Huber SC, Setti TM, Setti T, Lana JF. Human platelet lysate – A potent (and overlooked) orthobiologic. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. [Internet]. 2021;21:101534. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0976566221004185
  46. 46. Jayaram P, Chia Yeh P, Epstein M, Patel SJ. 7 - autologous Orthobiologics. In: Williams CJ, WalterL S, Pitts J, editors. Atlas of Interventional Orthopedics Procedures [Internet]. London, UK: Elsevier; 2022. pp. 70-88. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323755146000078
  47. 47. Molloy T, Wang Y, Murrell GAC. The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing. Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2003;33(5):381-394. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200333050-00004
  48. 48. Chiara Barsotti M, Losi P, Briganti E, Sanguinetti E, Magera A, Al Kayal T, et al. Effect of platelet lysate on human cells involved in different phases of wound healing. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84753
  49. 49. Dellera E, Bonferoni MC, Sandri G, Rossi S, Ferrari F, Del Fante C, et al. Development of chitosan oleate ionic micelles loaded with silver sulfadiazine to be associated with platelet lysate for application in wound healing. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics[Internet]. 2014;88(3):643-650. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641114002410
  50. 50. Centeno C, Markle J, Dodson E, Stemper I, Hyzy M, Williams C, et al. The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics.[Internet]. 2017;4(1):38. Available from: https://jeo-esska.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40634-017-0113-5
  51. 51. Bieback K. Platelet lysate as replacement for fetal bovine serum in mesenchymal stromal cell cultures. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy [Internet]. 2013;40(5):326-335. DOI: 10.1159/000354061
  52. 52. Al-Ajlouni J, Awidi A, Samara O, Al-Najar M, Tarwanah E, Saleh M, et al. Safety and efficacy of autologous intra-articular platelet lysates in early and intermediate knee osteoarthrosis in humans: A prospective open-label study. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine [Internet]. 2015;25(6):524-528. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/fulltext/2015/11000/safety_and_efficacy_of_autologous_intra_articular.10.aspx
  53. 53. Mohamed-Ahmed S, Fristad I, Lie SA, Suliman S, Mustafa K, Vindenes H, et al. Adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: A donor-matched comparison. Stem Cell Research & Therapy [Internet]. 2018;9(1):168. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0914-1
  54. 54. Izadpanah R, Trygg C, Patel B, Kriedt C, Dufour J, Gimble JM, et al. Biologic properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 2006;99(5):1285-1297. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.20904
  55. 55. Heo JS, Choi Y, Kim HS, Kim HO. Comparison of molecular profiles of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, placenta and adipose tissue. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2016;37(1):115-125. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2413
  56. 56. Dmitrieva RI, Minullina IR, Bilibina AA, Tarasova OV, Anisimov SV, Zaritskey AY. Bone marrow- and subcutaneous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Differences and similarities. Cell Cycle [Internet]. 2012;11(2):377-383. DOI: 10.4161/cc.11.2.18858
  57. 57. Scarpone M, Kuebler D, Chambers A, De Filippo CM, Amatuzio M, Ichim TE, et al. Isolation of clinically relevant concentrations of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells without centrifugation. Journal of Translational Medicine [Internet]. 2019;17(1):10. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1750-x
  58. 58. Hernigou J, Alves A, Homma Y, Guissou I, Hernigou P. Anatomy of the ilium for bone marrow aspiration: Map of sectors and implication for safe trocar placement. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) [Internet]. 2014;38(12):2585-2590. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00264-014-2353-7
  59. 59. Cavallo C, Boffa A, de Girolamo L, Merli G, Kon E, Cattini L, et al. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate quality is affected by age and harvest site. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy [Internet]. 2023;31(6):2140-2151. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07153-6
  60. 60. Everts PA, Ferrell J, Mahoney CB, Ii GF, de Roman MI, Paul R, et al. A comparative quantification in cellularity of bone marrow aspirated with two new harvesting devices, and the non-equivalent difference between a centrifugated bone marrow concentrate and a bone marrow aspirate as biological injectates, using a bi-lateral patient model. Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapeutics. 2020;10:1-10
  61. 61. Tsitsilianos N, Shirazi Z, Lu J, Singh JR. Bone marrow aspirate injection for osteoarthritis of the hip; A pilot study. Interventional Pain Medicine [Internet]. 2022;1(4):100163. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2772594422001613
  62. 62. Centeno CJ. Bone marrow concentrate (BMC) therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: Evidence-based policy position statement of American society of interventional pain physicians (ASIPP). Pain Physician [Internet]. 2020;23(2):E85-E131. Available from: https://painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NzAyNQ%3D%3D&journal=125
  63. 63. Everts PA, Malanga GA, Paul RV, Rothenberg JB, Stephens N, Mautner KR. Assessing clinical implications and perspectives of the pathophysiological effects of erythrocytes and plasma free hemoglobin in autologous biologics for use in musculoskeletal regenerative medicine therapies. A review. Regenerative Therapy [Internet]. 2019;11:56-64. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352320419300033
  64. 64. Lambertsen RH, Weiss L. Studies on the organization and regeneration of bone marrow: Origin, growth, and differentiation of endocloned hematopoietic colonies. American Journal of Anatomy [Internet]. 1983;166(4):369-392. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001660402
  65. 65. Spradling A, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T. Stem cells find their niche. Nature [Internet]. 2001;414(6859):98-104. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/35102160
  66. 66. Li L, Xie T. Stem cell niche: Structure and function. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2005;21:605-631
  67. 67. Yusop N, Battersby P, Alraies A, Sloan AJ, Moseley R, Waddington RJ. Isolation and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from rat bone marrow and the endosteal niche: A comparative study. Stem Cells International [Internet]. 2018;2018:1-14. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sci/2018/6869128/
  68. 68. Siclari VA, Zhu J, Akiyama K, Liu F, Zhang X, Chandra A, et al. Mesenchymal progenitors residing close to the bone surface are functionally distinct from those in the central bone marrow. Bone [Internet]. 2013;53(2):575-586. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S8756328212014317
  69. 69. Mangialardi G, Cordaro A, Madeddu P. The bone marrow pericyte: An orchestrator of vascular niche. Regenerative Medicine. [Internet]. 2016;11(8):883-895. DOI: 10.2217/rme-2016-0121
  70. 70. Lana JFSD, da Fonseca LF, da Macedo RR, Mosaner T, Murrell W, Kumar A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma vs bone marrow aspirate concentrate: An overview of mechanisms of action and orthobiologic synergistic effects. WJSC [Internet]. 2021;13(2):155-167. Available from: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v13/i2/155.htm
  71. 71. Everts P, Flanagan G II, Rothenberg J, Mautner K. The rationale of autologously prepared bone marrow aspirate concentrate for use in regenerative medicine applications. In: Regenerative Medicine [Internet]. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2020. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/the-rationale-of-autologously-prepared-bone-marrow-aspirate-concentrate-for-use-in-regenerative-medi
  72. 72. Van Boxtel J, Vonk LA, Stevens HP, Van Dongen JA. Mechanically derived tissue stromal vascular fraction acts anti-inflammatory on TNF alpha-stimulated chondrocytes in vitro. Bioengineering [Internet]. 2022;9(8):345. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/9/8/345
  73. 73. Alexander R. Overview of cellular stromal vascular fraction (cSVF) & biocellular uses of stem/stromal cells & matrix (tSVF+ HD-PRP) in regenerative medicine, aesthetic medicine and plastic surgery. Journal of Stem Cells Research, Development & Therapy. 2019;2:304-312
  74. 74. Klein JA. The tumescent technique: Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatologic Clinics. 1990;8(3):425-437. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0733863518304741
  75. 75. Simonacci F, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP, Raposio E. From liposuction to adipose-derived stem cells: Indications and technique. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parmensis [Internet]. 2019;90(2):197-208. DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i2.6619
  76. 76. Illouz Y. Body contouring by lipolysis: A 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [Internet]. 1983;72(5):591-597. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198311000-00001
  77. 77. Kurita M, Matsumoto D, Shigeura T, Sato K, Gonda K, Harii K, et al. Influences of centrifugation on cells and tissues in liposuction aspirates: Optimized centrifugation for lipotransfer and cell isolation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [Internet]. 2008;121(3):1033-1041. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-200803000-00041
  78. 78. Gentile P, Calabrese C, De Angelis B, Pizzicannella J, Kothari A, Garcovich S. Impact of the different preparation methods to obtain human adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells (AD-SVFs) and human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs): Enzymatic digestion versus mechanical centrifugation. IJMS [Internet]. 2019;20(21):5471. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/21/5471
  79. 79. Argentati C, Morena F, Bazzucchi M, Armentano I, Emiliani C, Martino S. Adipose stem cell translational applications: From bench-to-bedside. IJMS [Internet]. 2018;19(11):3475. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/11/3475
  80. 80. Alexander RW. Adipose tissue complex (ATC): Cellular and biocellular uses of stem/stromal cells and matrix in cosmetic plastic, reconstructive surgery and regenerative medicine. In: Duscher D, Shiffman MA, editors. Regenerative Medicine and Plastic Surgery: Skin and Soft Tissue, Bone, Cartilage, Muscle, Tendon and Nerves [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 45-69. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19962-3_5
  81. 81. Oberbauer E, Steffenhagen C, Wurzer C, Gabriel C, Redl H, Wolbank S. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic isolation systems for adipose tissue-derived cells: Current state of the art. Cell Regeneration [Internet]. 2015;4:7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2045976917300093
  82. 82. Williams SK, Wang TF, Castrillo R, Jarrell BE. Liposuction-derived human fat used for vascular graft sodding contains endothelial cells and not mesothelial cells as the major cell type. Journal of Vascular Surgery [Internet]. 1994;19(5):916-923. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0741521494700192
  83. 83. Wong SP, Rowley JE, Redpath AN, Tilman JD, Fellous TG, Johnson JR. Pericytes, mesenchymal stem cells and their contributions to tissue repair. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2015;151:107-120
  84. 84. Guo J, Nguyen A, Banyard DA, Fadavi D, Toranto JD, Wirth GA, et al. Stromal vascular fraction: A regenerative reality? Part 2: Mechanisms of regenerative action. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery [Internet]. 2016;69(2):180-188. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1748681515004982
  85. 85. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Peeters G, Hamdi M, Cornelissen M, Declercq H. Nanofat grafting: Basic research and clinical applications. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [Internet]. 2013;132(4):1017-1026. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-201310000-00053
  86. 86. Bianchi F, Maioli M, Leonardi E, Olivi E, Pasquinelli G, Valente S, et al. A new nonenzymatic method and device to obtain a fat tissue derivative highly enriched in pericyte-like elements by mild mechanical forces from human lipoaspirates. Cell Transplantation [Internet]. 2013;22(11):2063-2077. DOI: 10.3727/096368912X657855
  87. 87. Jiang W, Cai J, Guan J, Liao Y, Lu F, Ma J, et al. Characterized the adipogenic capacity of adipose-derived stem cell, extracellular matrix, and microenvironment with fat components grafting. Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology [Internet]. 2021;9:723057. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.723057/full
  88. 88. Tate-Oliver K, Alexander RW. Combination of autologous adipose-derived tissue stromal vascular fraction plus high density platelet-rich plasma or bone marrow concentrates in Achilles tendon tears. Journal of Prolotherapy. 2013;5:e895-e912
  89. 89. Tapp H, Hanley EN, Patt JC, Gruber HE. Adipose-derived stem cells: Characterization and current application in orthopaedic tissue repair. Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.) [Internet]. 2009;234(1):1-9. DOI: 10.3181/0805-MR-170
  90. 90. Blaber SP, Webster RA, Hill CJ, Breen EJ, Kuah D, Vesey G, et al. Analysis of in vitro secretion profiles from adipose-derived cell populations. Journal of Translational Medicine [Internet]. 2012;10(1):172. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-172
  91. 91. Everts PA, Warbout M, de Veth D, Cirkel M, Spruijt NE, Buth J. Use of epidermal skin grafts in chronic wounds: A case series: Epidermal skin grafts in chronic wounds. International Wound Journal [Internet]. 2017;14(6):1213-1218. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12787
  92. 92. Gentile P, Garcovich S. Systematic review—The potential implications of different platelet-rich plasma (PRP) concentrations in regenerative medicine for tissue repair. IJMS [Internet]. 2020;21(16):5702. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/16/5702
  93. 93. Oklu R, Walker TG, Wicky S, Hesketh R. Angiogenesis and current antiangiogenic strategies for the treatment of cancer. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2010;21(12):1791-1805
  94. 94. Waldner M, Zhang W, James IB, Allbright K, Havis E, Bliley JM, et al. Characteristics and immunomodulating functions of adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells across defined human leukocyte antigen barriers. Frontiers in Immunology [Internet]. 2018;9:1642. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01642/full
  95. 95. Wang X, Thomsen P. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles and bone regeneration. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2021;128(1):18-36
  96. 96. Sánchez M, Anitua E, Delgado D, Sanchez P, Prado R, Orive G, et al. Platelet-rich plasma, a source of autologous growth factors and biomimetic scaffold for peripheral nerve regeneration. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy [Internet]. 2017;17(2):197-212. DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1259409
  97. 97. Bohren Y, Timbolschi DI, Muller A, Barrot M, Yalcin I, Salvat E. Platelet-rich plasma and cytokines in neuropathic pain: A narrative review and a clinical perspective. European Journal of Pain [Internet]. 2022;26(1):43-60. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1846
  98. 98. Thomi G, Joerger-Messerli M, Haesler V, Muri L, Surbek D, Schoeberlein A. Intranasally administered exosomes from umbilical cord stem cells have preventive neuroprotective effects and contribute to functional recovery after perinatal brain injury. Cells. 2019;8(8):855
  99. 99. Rubio-Azpeitia E, Andia I. Partnership between platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cells: in vitro experience. Biological Effects. Muscles Ligaments Tendons Journal. 2014;8;4(1):52-62
  100. 100. Delgado D, Garate A, Sánchez P, Bilbao AM, Garcia Del Cano G, Salles J, et al. Biological and structural effects after intraosseous infiltrations of age-dependent platelet-rich plasma: An in vivo study. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2020;38(9):1931-1941
  101. 101. Harrison P, Martin CE. Platelet α-granules. Blood Reviews [Internet]. 1993;7(1):52-62. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0268960X9390024X
  102. 102. Sánchez-González DJ, Méndez-Bolaina E, Trejo-Bahena NI. Platelet-rich plasma peptides: Key for regeneration. International Journal of Peptides [Internet]. 2012;2012:1-10. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/archive/2012/532519/
  103. 103. Everts PA, Lana JF, Alexander RW, Dallo I, Kon E, Ambach MA, et al. Profound properties of protein-rich, platelet-rich plasma matrices as novel, multi-purpose biological platforms in tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing. IJMS [Internet]. 2024;25(14):7914. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/14/7914
  104. 104. Senthilkumar S, Rajesh S, Mohan D, Soundararajan P. Preparation, characterization, and performance evaluation of poly(ether-imide) incorporated cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane for Hemodialysis. Separation Science and Technology [Internet]. 2013;48(1):66-75. DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2012.674603
  105. 105. Suzuki H, Oshima N, Watari T. Effect of modified ultrafiltration on cytokines and hemoconcentration in dogs undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 2020;82(11):1589-1593. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jvms/82/11/82_20-0143/_article
  106. 106. Mercader Ruiz J, Beitia M, Delgado D, Sánchez P, Guadilla J, Pérez De Arrilucea C, et al. Method based on ultrafiltration to obtain a plasma rich in platelet and plasma growth factors. JCM [Internet]. 2023;12(18):5941. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/18/5941
  107. 107. Muir SM, Reisbig N, Baria M, Kaeding C, Bertone AL. The concentration of plasma provides additional bioactive proteins in platelet and autologous protein solutions. The American Journal of Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2019;47(8):1955-1963. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519849671
  108. 108. Vandooren J, Itoh Y. Alpha-2-macroglobulin in inflammation, immunity and infections. Frontiers in Immunology [Internet]. 2021;12:803244. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.803244/full
  109. 109. Yan Z, Yin H, Nerlich M, Pfeifer CG, Docheva D. Boosting tendon repair: Interplay of cells, growth factors and scaffold-free and gel-based carriers. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics [Internet]. 2018;5(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-017-0117-1
  110. 110. Lomas AJ, Ryan CNM, Sorushanova A, Shologu N, Sideri AI, Tsioli V, et al. The past, present and future in scaffold-based tendon treatments. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews [Internet]. 2015;84:257-277. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169409X14002956
  111. 111. Li S, Xing F, Yan T, Zhang S, Chen F. The efficiency and safety of platelet-rich plasma dressing in the treatment of chronic wounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JPM [Internet]. 2023;13(3):430. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/13/3/430
  112. 112. Anitua E, Andia I, Ardanza B, Nurden P, Nurden A. Autologous platelets as a source of proteins for healing and tissue regeneration. Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Internet]. 2004;91(01):4-15. DOI: 10.1160/TH03-07-0440
  113. 113. Bilgen F, Ural A, Bekerecioglu M. Platelet-rich fibrin: An effective chronic wound healing accelerator. Journal of Tissue Viability [Internet]. 2021;30(4):616-620. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0965206X21000656
  114. 114. Pinto NR, Ubilla M, Zamora Y, Del Rio V, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Quirynen M. Leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) as a regenerative medicine strategy for the treatment of refractory leg ulcers: A prospective cohort study. Platelets [Internet]. 2018;29(5):468-475. DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1327654
  115. 115. Calisir A, Ece I, Yormaz S, Colak B, Kirazli H, Sahin M. The effects of platelet-rich plasma to decrease the risk of Seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection. Journal of Surgical Research [Internet]. 2020;256:156-162. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022480420304303
  116. 116. Chen TM, Tsai JC, Burnouf T. A novel technique combining platelet gel, skin graft, and fibrin glue for healing recalcitrant lower extremity ulcers. Dermatologic Surgery. 2010;36(4):453-460
  117. 117. Nourizadeh N, Sedaghat Sharifi N, Bakhshaee M, Ghiasi S, Rasoulian B, Hamidi AD. PRP-fibrin glue for pain reduction and rapid healing in tonsillectomy. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology [Internet]. 2022;34(6):289. DOI: 10.22038/ijorl.2022.40429.2532
  118. 118. Micovic S, Everts P, Calija B, Strugarevic E, Grubor N, Boricic M, et al. Novel autologous, high concentrated fibrin as advanced hemostatic agent for coronary surgery. Transfusion and Apheresis Science [Internet]. 2021;60(4):103171. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1473050221001373
  119. 119. Hassan MM, Sharmin S, Kim HJ, Hong ST. Identification and characterization of plasmin-independent thrombolytic enzymes. Circulation Research [Internet]. 2021;128(3):386-400. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317245
  120. 120. Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Fibrin formation, structure and properties. In: Parry DAD, Squire JM, editors. Fibrous Proteins: Structures and Mechanisms [Internet], Subcellular Biochemistry. Vol. 82. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 405-456. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49674-0_13
  121. 121. Lian Z, Yin X, Li H, Jia L, He X, Yan Y, et al. Synergistic effect of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma in Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Annals of Dermatology [Internet]. 2014;26(1):1. DOI: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.1.1
  122. 122. Sassoli C, Vallone L, Tani A, Chellini F, Nosi D, Zecchi-Orlandini S. Combined use of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and platelet rich plasma (PRP) stimulates proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts in vitro: New therapeutic perspectives for skeletal muscle repair/regeneration. Cell and Tissue Research [Internet]. 2018;372(3):549-570. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-018-2792-3
  123. 123. Muiños-López E, Delgado D, Sánchez P, Paiva B, Anitua E, Fiz N, et al. Modulation of synovial fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells by intra-articular and intraosseous platelet rich plasma administration. Stem Cells International [Internet]. 2016;2016:1-10. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sci/2016/1247950/
  124. 124. Kim SJ, Kim EK, Kim SJ, Song DH. Effects of bone marrow aspirate concentrate and platelet-rich plasma on patients with partial tear of the rotator cuff tendon. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research [Internet]. 2018;13(1):1. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0693-x
  125. 125. Cassano JM, Kennedy JG, Ross KA, Fraser EJ, Goodale MB, Fortier LA. Bone marrow concentrate and platelet-rich plasma differ in cell distribution and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist protein concentration. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy [Internet]. 2018;26(1):333-342. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-3981-9
  126. 126. Ziegler CG, Van Sloun R, Gonzalez S, Whitney KE, DePhillipo NN, Kennedy MI, et al. Characterization of growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines in bone marrow concentrate and platelet-rich plasma: A prospective analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine [Internet]. 2019;47(9):2174-2187. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519832003
  127. 127. Dhillon MS, Karna SK, Dhatt SS, Behera P, Bhatia A. Can platelet rich plasma stimulate human ACL growth in culture? A preliminary experience. Muscles Ligaments Tendons Journal. 2015;5(3)156-161
  128. 128. Bai M, Yin H, Han C, Du Z, Meng G, Jiang D. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell composited with platelet rich plasma improved repair of annulus fibrosus rupture. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2017;10(6):8989-8998
  129. 129. Desando G, Bartolotti I, Vannini F, Cavallo C, Castagnini F, Buda R, et al. Repair potential of matrix-induced bone marrow aspirate concentrate and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for talar osteochondral repair: Patterns of some catabolic, inflammatory, and pain mediators. Cartilage. 2017;8(1):50-60
  130. 130. Brewer JM, McCarthy MB, Pauzenburger L, Cote MP, Mazzocca AD. Combining platelet rich plasma and concentrated bone marrow with a demineralized bone matrix scaffold enhances growth factor release over time. Muscle Ligaments and Tendons J [Internet]. 2021;11(03):484. Available from: http://www.mltj.online/combining-platelet-rich-plasma-and-concentrated-bone-marrow-with-a-demineralized-bone-matrix-scaffold-enhances-growth-factor-release-over-time/
  131. 131. Hoberman AR, Cirino C, McCarthy MB, Cote MP, Pauzenberger L, Beitzel K, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells enhanced by platelet-rich plasma maintain adhesion to scaffolds in arthroscopic simulation. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2018;34(3):872-881
  132. 132. Martin JF, Shaw T, Heggie J, Penington DG. Measurement of the density of human platelets and its relationship to volume. British Journal of Haematology [Internet]. 2008;54(3):337-352. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1983.00337.x
  133. 133. Li F, Guo W, Li K, Yu M, Tang W, Wang H, et al. Improved fat graft survival by different volume fractions of platelet-rich plasma and adipose-derived stem cells. Aesthetic Surgery Journal [Internet]. 2015;35(3):319-333. Available from: http://academic.oup.com/asj/article/35/3/319/200513/Improved-Fat-Graft-Survival-by-Different-Volume
  134. 134. Smith OJ, Jell G, Mosahebi A. The use of fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma for wound healing: A review of the current evidence. International Wound Journal [Internet]. 2019;16(1):275-285. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13029
  135. 135. Hersant B, Sid-Ahmed M, Braud L, Jourdan M, Baba-Amer Y, Meningaud JP, et al. Platelet-rich plasma improves the wound healing potential of mesenchymal stem cells through paracrine and metabolism alterations. Stem Cells International [Internet]. 2019;2019:1-14. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/sci/2019/1234263/
  136. 136. Blanton MW, Hadad I, Johnstone BH, Mund JA, Rogers PI, Eppley BL, et al. Adipose stromal cells and platelet-rich plasma therapies synergistically increase revascularization during wound healing. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [Internet]. 2009;123(Supplement):56S-64S. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-200902001-00009
  137. 137. Chen CF, Liao HT. Platelet-rich plasma enhances adipose-derived stem cell-mediated angiogenesis in a mouse ischemic hindlimb model. WJSC [Internet]. 2018;10(12):212-227. Available from: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v10/i12/212.htm
  138. 138. Siegel KR, Clevenger TN, Clegg DO, Proctor DA, Proctor CS. Adipose stem cells incorporated in fibrin clot modulate expression of growth factors. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery [Internet]. 2018;34(2):581-591. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749806317310629
  139. 139. Lai F, Kakudo N, Morimoto N, Taketani S, Hara T, Ogawa T, et al. Platelet-rich plasma enhances the proliferation of human adipose stem cells through multiple signaling pathways. Stem Cell Research & Therapy [Internet]. 2018;9(1):107. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-018-0851-z
  140. 140. Van Dongen JA, Tuin AJ, Spiekman M, Jansma J, Van Der Lei B, Harmsen MC. Comparison of intraoperative procedures for isolation of clinical grade stromal vascular fraction for regenerative purposes: A systematic review: Intraoperative procedures for stromal vascular fraction isolation. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine [Internet]. 2018;12(1):e261-e274. DOI: 10.1002/term.2407
  141. 141. Rodríguez-Flores J, Palomar-Gallego MA, Enguita-Valls AB, Rodríguez-Peralto JL, Torres J. Influence of platelet-rich plasma on the histologic characteristics of the autologous fat graft to the upper lip of rabbits. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2011;35:480-486
  142. 142. Chignon-Sicard B, Kouidhi M, Yao X, Delerue-Audegond A, Villageois P, Peraldi P, et al. Platelet-rich plasma respectively reduces and promotes adipogenic and myofibroblastic differentiation of human adipose-derived stromal cells via the TGFβ signalling pathway. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2017;7(1):2954. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03113-0
  143. 143. Wu M, Karvar M, Liu Q , Orgill DP, Panayi AC. Comparison of conventional and platelet-rich plasma-assisted fat grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery [Internet]. 2021;74(11):2821-2830. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1748681521002989
  144. 144. Kakudo N, Minakata T, Mitsui T, Kushida S, Notodihardjo FZ, Kusumoto K. Proliferation-promoting effect of platelet-rich plasma on human adipose-derived stem cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2008;122(5):1352-1360. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-200811000-00007
  145. 145. Chun SY, Lim JO, Lee EH, Han MH, Ha YS, Lee JN, et al. Preparation and characterization of human adipose tissue-derived extracellular matrix, growth factors, and stem cells: A concise review. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine [Internet]. 2019;16(4):385-393. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-019-00199-7
  146. 146. De Lima BR, Stellet Lourenço E, De Azevedo Dos Santos JV, Rodrigues Santiago Rocha N, Mourão CF, Alves GG. The effects of platelet-rich fibrin in the behavior of mineralizing cells related to bone tissue regeneration—A scoping review of In vitro evidence. JFB [Internet]. 2023;14(10):503. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4983/14/10/503
  147. 147. D’Esposito V, Passaretti F, Perruolo G, Ambrosio MR, Valentino R, Oriente F, et al. Platelet-rich plasma increases growth and motility of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells and controls adipocyte secretory function. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry [Internet]. 2015;116(10):2408-2418. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25235
  148. 148. Kang YH, Jeon SH, Park JY, Chung JH, Choung YH, Choung HW, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin is a bioscaffold and reservoir of growth factors for tissue regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part A [Internet]. 2011;17(3-4):349-359. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0327
  149. 149. Aoyagi Y, Kuroda M, Asada S, Tanaka S, Konno S, Tanio M, et al. Fibrin glue is a candidate scaffold for long-term therapeutic protein expression in spontaneously differentiated adipocytes in vitro. Experimental Cell Research [Internet]. 2012;318(1):8-15. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014482711004010

Written By

Peter A. Everts, Luga Podesta and Robert W. Alexander

Submitted: 25 March 2024 Reviewed: 19 August 2024 Published: 12 September 2024