Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Navigating Sustainability: A Conceptual Exploration of Road Freight Decarbonisation

Written By

Anthony E. Ezenwa, Akunna Oledinma, Martin Osei, Obiajulu Ede, Christopher Ikeogu and Nze Ibeawuchi

Submitted: 01 January 2024 Reviewed: 21 January 2024 Published: 08 July 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004998

Advances in Logistics Engineering IntechOpen
Advances in Logistics Engineering Edited by Ágota Bányai

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Logistics Engineering [Working Title]

Associate Prof. Ágota Bányai

Chapter metrics overview

9 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This chapter underscores the critical importance of embracing alternative fuels, specifically natural gas and hydrogen, as pivotal elements in the concerted effort to decarbonise road freight operations. It accentuates the necessity for collaborative, well-informed decision-making processes to navigate the complexities of this transition successfully. The exploration extends beyond technological considerations to encompass policy-driven initiatives adopted by nations like Norway, India, the USA, the UK, South Africa, and Germany, among others. Notably, it scrutinises instances of demonstrated economic viability associated with specific decarbonisation strategies employed in these regions. Moreover, the chapter advocates for sustained interdisciplinary research efforts to comprehensively address the diverse challenges posed by regional variations, industry-specific requirements, operational environments, cross-cultural influences, and the integration of sustainability metrics. By emphasising the importance of ongoing technological innovation, robust policy frameworks, and thoughtful economic considerations, the chapter envisions a global roadmap for sustainable road freight practices. In essence, it calls for a holistic approach, urging scholars, policymakers, and industry experts to collaboratively shape a sustainable future for road freight that addresses the intricate interplay of technological advancements, policy dynamics, and economic imperatives on a global scale.

Keywords

  • road freight decarbonisation
  • alternative fuels
  • natural gas
  • hydrogen
  • policy frameworks
  • sustainability metrics

1. Introduction

The urgent need to address climate change has led to a detailed examination of various industries’ environmental impacts, highlighting transportation as a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions [1, 2, 3]. Among transportation sectors, road freight operations stand out as significant contributors to carbon emissions [4, 5]. In India, road transportation alone accounted for more than 56% of the country’s transportation sector emissions in 2019, totalling 2508 million tonnes (Mton), surpassing the global contribution of the entire transportation sector [2]. The transport sector in India represents 18% of total energy consumption, requiring an estimated 200 Mtoe of energy stock by 2030 if current trends persist [2].

Similarly, China, with the world’s largest truck industry, sees over 50% of its total transport emissions originating from road freight [3]. Globally, the transport sector, representing 28% of total energy demand, is projected to contribute up to 10.3 Gt CO2/year by 2040 [6]. Decarbonising this sector poses formidable challenges due to factors such as high vehicle dependency, widespread use of combustion-based engine technologies, low petroleum costs, and limited alternatives to fossil fuels, and fragmentated operation [1].

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [7] emphasises that the primary source of carbon emissions in road freight is the combustion of fossil fuels, particularly diesel, leading to the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and contributing to global climate change [4, 6, 8, 9, 10]. Secondary pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter, further impact air quality and public health [2, 5, 11, 12]. Diesel-powered trucks operating in urban areas worsen air quality, posing a threat to public health [6].

Recognising the urgency of addressing this issue, Lee and Kim [13] emphasises the need to transform road freight operations through sustainable practices and technological innovations. Therefore, this chapter aims to provide a foundation for a concise exploration of road freight decarbonisation, covering challenges, strategic approaches, policy frameworks, technological innovations, case studies, and global perspectives. It aligns with the perspective that road freight’s heavy reliance on fossil fuels necessitates global efforts to mitigate climate change and enhance environmental sustainability.

Subsequent sections of the chapter encompass methodology, a brief literature review, an investigation into challenges, approaches, and strategies to decarbonise road freight operations. Others comprise global perspectives, case studies showcasing best practices and lessons learned, an examination of future outlook, discussion, and ultimately, a conclusion providing guidance for future studies.

Advertisement

2. Methodology

This chapter employs a conceptual literature review method to furnish an exhaustive comprehension of the intricate domain of road freight decarbonisation [14]. Through amalgamating existing knowledge, this review seeks to elucidate fundamental concepts, burgeoning trends, and crucial lacunae in the literature, thereby establishing the groundwork for a nuanced exploration of sustainability in the realm of road freight. Specifically, the chapter establishes a lucid comprehension of sustainability within the ambit of road freight by scrutinising seminal works and contemporary literature on sustainability. It focuses on how sustainability is conceptualised and applied in the road freight industry. Subsequently, the approach identifies and scrutinises various strategies employed for decarbonising road freight, drawing upon empirical studies, industry reports, and technological advancements. These decarbonisation approaches are categorised into technological, operational, and policy-driven interventions.

Further, the chapter delves into the economic dimension of transitioning towards sustainable road freight practices. It draws on empirical papers, business case studies, and industry reports to fathom the financial implications for stakeholders in the road freight sector. Following this, the chapter evaluates the environmental consequences of road freight decarbonisation efforts through an examination of life cycle assessments, carbon footprint analyses, and ecological impact studies. This enables an assessment of the overall environmental sustainability of different decarbonisation strategies. Moreover, the chapter scrutinises the role of policies and regulations in shaping road freight decarbonisation by reviewing national and international policy documents. It analyses their effectiveness, challenges, and potential for promoting sustainable practices in the road freight industry. In a similar vein, the chapter identifies and discusses key challenges and associated opportunities with road freight decarbonisation. This is achieved through the synthesis of empirical findings to provide insights into the multifaceted nature of challenges and opportunities in this context.

Finally, the chapter incorporates diverse stakeholders’ perspectives to enhance the conceptual understanding of road freight decarbonisation. This is accomplished through the exploration of industry reports and business case studies. In conclusion, the conceptual literature review culminates in a comprehensive synthesis, offering a holistic understanding of road freight decarbonisation within the broader context of sustainability. By traversing the conceptual landscape, this chapter aims to provide a robust foundation for subsequent discussions and analyses in the pursuit of a sustainable future for road freight.

Advertisement

3. Brief literature review

In the pursuit of sustainable road freight, recent studies (e.g., [1, 6, 8, 9, 15]) offer valuable insights into the multifaceted challenges and opportunities within this domain. The collective findings underscore the complexity of road freight decarbonisation, emphasising the intricate interplay of technological, economic, and policy dimensions. Churchman et al. [1] recognise the pivotal role of freight demand segments in influencing decarbonisation strategies. Varied preferences for motive technologies and the potential of containerised rail highlight the need for nuanced, context-specific approaches. Hossain et al. [2] delve into regional specifics, focusing on India’s roadmap for 2050. Their emphasis on adopting alternative fuels and advanced technologies aligns with a global push towards sustainability.

Ma et al. [3] conducts a comprehensive Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis, shedding light on the life cycle costs of electric and fuel cell (FC) trucks. The study’s emphasis on emission reductions and the role of alternative fuels resonates with Gómez Vilchez et al. [4], who evaluate European decarbonisation trends, highlighting the dominance of natural gas and the imperative for unified policies. de las Nieves Camacho et al. [6] examine hydrogen heavy-duty FC trucks, stressing collaboration, and objective testing for informed decision-making. Haugen et al. [8] tackle hydrogen production challenges, recommending electrolysis as a short-term solution. They identify critical research domains, aligning with Zhang et al. [16], who optimise FC systems in commercial trucks. The potential of hydrogen extends to long-haul strategies, as illustrated by Rohith et al. [17], promoting the platooning of electrified heavy goods vehicles. Rosenberg et al. [18] examine Norway’s policy-driven approach, while de Saxe et al. [15] provide evidence of tangible benefits from a 2020 project, demonstrating the economic viability of certain strategies. Barton and Thomson [10] contribute valuable insights into electrification feasibility based on vehicle types and energy needs. Deshpande et al. [19] propose Electric Road Systems (ERS) as economically viable for key transport networks. Studies by Zhang et al. [5] and Melo [9] emphasise the significance of regional and sector-specific approaches. Zhang et al. [5] advocate for a balanced policy focus in Ireland, while Melo [9] empirical model in Scotland underscores the importance of demand- and supply-led factors in achieving emission reduction targets.

Capros et al. [20] advocate for a model-based analysis to decarbonise the EU economy, stressing the cost significance of timely access to decarbonisation options. Sharmina et al. [21] introduce a new framework for monitoring and assessing mitigation progress, aligning with the call for integrated models and highlighting untapped mitigation opportunities. In conclusion, this critical synthesis calls for continued interdisciplinary research, integrating technological innovation, regional specifics, policy frameworks, and economic considerations. Practical implementations and pilot projects, similar to de Saxe et al. [15], should be encouraged to validate theoretical models. Furthermore, a focus on social science aspects, as highlighted by Churchman and Longhurst [22] is crucial for understanding business transitions and ensuring consumer-centric sustainability. Future studies should aim for a holistic understanding of road freight decarbonisation, fostering collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers to drive sustainable change.

Moreover, we explore current trends in academic publications within the road freight decarbonisation debate. This section focuses on presenting and summarising observed patterns, frequencies, and themes with limited subjective opinions. Our review of the timeline and article distribution indicates an increasing trend in research output, highlighting the subject’s growing relevance. Most publications (9) are from Elsevier Ltd., followed by MDP and Taylor and Francis Ltd., with 4 and 2 publications, respectively, alongside others. Similarly, the review papers are 16 articles and 2 review papers in the specified context. The distribution of articles by journals provides an overview of the sources contributing to research in energy, transportation, and related environmental topics (see Figure 1a). The methodology employed in the reviewed articles encompass scholarly literature examination, quantitative analysis through engineering and statistical modelling, as well as simulation techniques, and qualitative investigation through interviews (see Figure 1b). Finally refer to Table 1 for the full meaning of abbreviations.

Figure 1.

Publication trend by journals and research methods.

AbbreviationFull meaning
EVElectric vehicles
IPPCIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IEAInternational Energy Agency
WHOWorld Health Organisation
ISOInternational Organisation for Standardisation
ITFInternational Trust Fund
USDEU.S. Department of Energy
LNGLiquefied natural gas
LRCLow Carbon Logistics (LRC)
HGVHeavy goods vehicles
LGVLight goods vehicles
FCEVFuel cell electric vehicle
FCFuel cell
CO2Carbon dioxide
NOxNitrogen oxides
GHGGreenhouse gas
ICEsInternal combustion engines
CECircular economy
TCOTotal Cost of Ownership

Table 1.

Abbreviations and their full meanings with references.

Advertisement

4. Understanding the challenge

4.1 Emission sources in road freight

Understanding and mitigating road freight emissions necessitates addressing various sources across the supply chain, including vehicle fuel combustion, manufacturing, maintenance, infrastructure, idling inefficiencies, and suboptimal logistics practices [713, 21, 22]. To formulate effective strategies, it is crucial to acknowledge and target these points. In road freight operations, where diesel in heavy-duty trucks is a major emission source [23], efficient fuel combustion is paramount (see Figure 2Interlink transport coal in the PBS pilot project). This process, occurring within internal combustion engines, involves chemical reactions between fuel hydrocarbon molecules and oxygen, impacting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per unit of energy [24]. Modern trucks use advanced technologies to enhance combustion efficiency and reduce emissions [25]. Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies, considering the entire life cycle, guide sustainable solutions [24]. Environmental impact regulations, like those by the European Commission, aim to mitigate traditional fuel combustion effects [26]. With a growing emphasis on alternative fuels like electric vehicles, hydrogen fuel cells, and biofuels [23], the road to decarbonising road freight involves considerations of fuel combustion efficiency, emissions, regulatory frameworks, alternative fuels, technological innovations, and holistic environmental impact assessments.

Figure 2.

Interlink transport coal in the PBS pilot project (source: [15]).

Vehicle manufacturing and maintenance are integral to road freight’s carbon footprint. Energy-intensive production processes and material extraction contribute to emissions. Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies, such as Hawkins, Singh [24], provide insights into the environmental impact of manufacturing. Material selection and lightweighting strategies inform emission rates [25]. Efficient maintenance practices, including predictive maintenance, can reduce emissions [27] Circular economy principles in manufacturing and maintenance optimise designs for longevity and recycling, mitigating environmental impact [28]. Decarbonising road freight involves a shift to electric vehicles, with the [7] highlighting their manufacturing and maintenance efficiency. Optimising manufacturing processes and embracing sustainable maintenance practices contribute to a more environmentally sustainable road freight industry.

Infrastructure construction and maintenance, energy-intensive processes, contribute substantially to emissions [29]. Integrating intelligent technologies like condition monitoring and predictive maintenance is essential [30]. Sustainable practices, such as incorporating alternative materials and construction technologies, are pivotal [31]. Green corridors, wildlife-friendly structures, and strategic investments in multimodal transportation systems are essential for sustainable infrastructure [32]. Infrastructure development and maintenance need careful consideration for road freight decarbonisation. Implementing sustainable practices, exploring alternative materials, and adopting innovative technologies are fundamental steps towards a more ecologically sound road freight industry.

Vehicle idling and operational inefficiencies significantly contribute to carbon emissions in road freight. Reducing idling time, optimising routes, and improving load factors are direct approaches to mitigate emissions [33]. Technologies like telematics and connectivity enable real-time monitoring, contributing to decarbonisation by enhancing efficiency [34]. Smart logistics, incorporating real-time tracking and supply chain optimisation through IoT and AI, addresses inefficiencies [35]. Idling regulations, anti-idling technologies, and emission standards drive the adoption of fuel-efficient technologies [26, 36]. Addressing idling and operational inefficiencies is pivotal for road freight decarbonisation, and integrating technological solutions, smart logistics, and regulatory measures contributes to sustainable freight operations.

Inefficient cargo capacity utilisation and the transportation of empty containers contribute to increased carbon emissions. Optimising return journeys, implementing smart logistics, and collaborative initiatives enhance operational efficiency [3738]. Integrating technological solutions like telematics and route optimisation is essential. Regulatory measures incentivising or mandating reduced empty haulage and underutilised capacity contribute to road freight decarbonisation [38]. A multifaceted approach, including technological solutions, collaborative freight initiatives, and regulatory measures, is essential for mitigating these inefficiencies and achieving road freight decarbonisation.

Inefficient logistics practices, including suboptimal route planning and excessive inventory, contribute to increased carbon emissions. Efficient resource utilisation, technology integration, alternative fuel adoption, green logistics initiatives, collaboration, and regulatory compliance are crucial elements driving sustainable practices in road freight [13]. Aligning logistics and supply chain practices with environmental goals is a critical prerequisite for achieving meaningful decarbonisation. Likewise, a comprehensive understanding of diverse emission sources is essential for designing effective decarbonisation strategies for road freight.

4.2 Lifecycle assessment (LCA) in road freight

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a holistic approach that evaluates the environmental impact of road freight activities from production to end-of-life, covering stages such as raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, use, and disposal [39]. LCA identifies key points in the life cycle, directing decarbonisation efforts towards impactful stages like fuel combustion, manufacturing, and logistics [39]. Additionally, LCA facilitates the comparison of technologies, fuels, and operational practices, aiding decisions on cleaner alternatives in the road freight sector [39].

LCA’s significance lies in exposing carbon emissions associated with fuel combustion in road freight vehicles. Decarbonisation guided by LCA can focus on enhancing combustion efficiency, transitioning to alternative fuels, and adopting electric or hybrid vehicles [24]. Manufacturing emerges as a vital contributor to life cycle emissions, and LCA guides the selection of sustainable materials, lightweighting strategies, and eco-friendly manufacturing processes to reduce environmental impact [24] . LCA underscores logistics and supply chain practices as critical components affecting overall environmental impact. Insights can drive the adoption of smart logistics strategies, route optimisation, and collaborative efforts within the supply chain to enhance decarbonisation [40].

Considering the entire life cycle, LCA supports the argument for extending the operational lifespan of road freight vehicles. Maintenance and repair strategies, informed by LCA, contribute to reducing the need for frequent replacements and associated manufacturing emissions [41]. In summary, life cycle assessment stands as a crucial tool for evaluating and comprehensively addressing the environmental impact of road freight operations. Its holistic perspective, hotspot identification, and comparative analysis offer valuable insights crucial for effective decarbonisation, supporting optimisation of fuel combustion, sustainable material selection, efficient logistics practices, and the extension of vehicle lifespan—critical elements in achieving meaningful road freight decarbonisation.

Advertisement

5. Strategic approaches and global perspective

5.1 Strategic approaches

Decarbonising road freight is a complex challenge demanding strategic solutions across the entire supply chain. This assessment explores key strategies such as alternative fuels, advanced vehicles, modal shift, intermodal optimisation, green logistics initiatives, and regulatory compliance. Each strategy is evaluated for effectiveness, feasibility, and broader industry impact.

  • Alternative fuels: the integration of alternative fuels, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), hydrogen, and electricity, stands out as a pivotal strategy for reducing carbon emissions in road freight. Despite challenges such as infrastructure needs and initial costs, alternative fuels significantly contribute to lowering the carbon intensity of freight operations. The success of this strategy is amplified when combined with logistics optimisation, advanced vehicle technologies, and regulatory compliance.

  • Advanced vehicle technologies: innovations in engine efficiency, aerodynamics, and drivetrain optimisation play a crucial role in enhancing fuel efficiency and aligning with decarbonisation goals. Challenges like upfront costs and charging infrastructure gaps exist, but the overall impact on emission reduction is noteworthy. The synergy of advanced vehicle technologies with alternative fuels and logistics optimisation maximises their effectiveness in addressing various facets of carbon emissions in the road freight sector.

  • Modal shift and intermodal optimisation: modal shift involves redirecting freight to more sustainable modes, such as rail and water transport. Intermodal optimisation integrates different transportation modes for efficiency gains. Despite challenges like infrastructure limitations, both strategies complement each other, offering a diversified and environmentally sustainable freight transportation system. Successful implementation requires supportive policies, regulations, and strategic planning.

  • Green logistics initiatives: green logistics efforts focus on optimising vehicle fleets, adopting alternative fuels, and leveraging intermodal transport. Energy-efficient technologies and last-mile delivery solutions contribute to decreasing emissions per unit of freight transported [42, 43]. Digital technologies, including real-time tracking and data analytics, play a pivotal role in enhancing efficiency. Overcoming challenges requires collaborative efforts from stakeholders, governments, and policymakers.

  • Regulatory compliance and advocacy: regulatory compliance involves meeting emission standards to ensure environmentally acceptable road freight operations. Advocacy complements this by influencing policymakers to institute incentives and support the transition to cleaner alternatives. Effective advocacy addresses challenges related to enforcement and industry resistance. International collaboration is essential for harmonising regulations globally and achieving meaningful reductions in carbon emissions.

In conclusion, decarbonising road freight requires a holistic and integrated approach that combines these strategies. Each element contributes uniquely, and their collective implementation is key to achieving substantial and sustainable reductions in carbon emissions within the global road freight sector. Policymakers, industry stakeholders, and international bodies must collaborate to create an environment conducive to embracing these decarbonisation measures.

5.2 Global perspectives

This section explores the pivotal role of decarbonising road freight in addressing global climate change and sustainability. The literature review sheds light on key trends, challenges, and opportunities influencing the international landscape. A notable global trend is the increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in road freight, backed by significant investments from governments and industries, essential for reducing reliance on fossil fuels and mitigating carbon emissions. Additionally, the integration of advanced technologies like autonomous and connected vehicles, telematics, and real-time analytics is gaining traction globally, enhancing operational efficiency and fuel savings.

However, a significant challenge on a global scale is the insufficient charging infrastructure for EVs, emphasising the need for a robust and accessible charging network to fully exploit the potential of electric road freight [36]. Inconsistencies in policies across regions present obstacles to global road freight decarbonisation, underscoring the importance of harmonising regulations and emission standards worldwide [26]. Due to the global nature of road freight, increased international collaboration is considered necessary, enabling the sharing of best practices, technological innovations, and policy frameworks to expedite the decarbonisation process [44].

Opportunities lie in promoting multimodal transportation solutions integrating road, rail, and waterway transport, with coordinated global efforts having the potential to optimise supply chain logistics and contribute to overall emission reduction [37]. Stringent emission standards are becoming prevalent worldwide, with governments recognising the necessity of regulating road freight vehicle emissions to achieve climate goals [26]. Many countries are introducing incentives and subsidies to encourage the adoption of cleaner technologies in road freight, aligning with the global push for sustainable transportation [45]. The global outlook for road freight decarbonisation reflects a dynamic landscape, marked by a shift towards electric vehicles, advanced technology integration, and supportive policies. Despite challenges, international collaboration and concerted efforts can unlock opportunities for sustainable road freight operations worldwide. In summary, this section underscores the global necessity of decarbonising road freight while highlighting variations in challenges, opportunities, and strategies across distinct regions, focusing on North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Africa (refer to Table 2).

RegionChallengesOpportunitiesStrategies
North America
  • Lack of comprehensive EV charging infrastructure

  • Policy fragmentation

  • Abundance of renewable resources

  • Innovation hubs

  • Collaboration on charging infrastructure

  • Advocacy for unified emission standards

Europe
  • Urban congestion

  • Transition period for traditional fleets

  • Extensive rail and waterway networks

  • Strong regulatory framework

  • Urban logistics innovations

  • Incentive programs

Asia-Pacific
  • High urbanisation rates

  • Diverse economic realities

  • Growing middle class

  • Innovation in emerging economies

  • Sustainable urban planning

  • Technology transfer and collaboration

Africa
  • Insufficient road infrastructure

  • Economic constraints

  • Leapfrogging technologies

  • Infrastructural development

  • Regional collaboration

  • Economic empowerment

Table 2.

Overview of the regional road freight decarbonisation efforts.

Advertisement

6. Case studies of best practices, lessons learned, and future outlook

6.1 Case studies of best practices and policies

HJF Transports BVBA, a burgeoning family enterprise in Belgium with around thirty trucks, grapples with operational cost management and carbon emission reduction challenges [43]. In a strategic alliance with Shell Belgium, a prominent natural gas supplier, the company is transitioning its truck fleet to liquefied natural gas (LNG), perceived as a competitive and sustainable alternative to diesel. As per Shell’s report, 11 out of HJF Transports’ 30 trucks exclusively run on LNG, with plans for further investment in the LNG network across Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Poland. Mr. Fossoul, the company’s representative, underscores the limited public awareness of LNG’s efficiency and sustainability, emphasising the imperative for increased investment in this alternative [46].

Amid uncertainties and mounting diesel costs, HJF Transports perceives LNG as the optimal solution for immediate and sustainable fleet operations. The company’s commitment to environmental sustainability aligns with its 2018 investment strategy in LNG-powered trucks, a decision made in partnership with Shell Belgium. The success of the current LNG-powered trucks validates the company’s choice to invest in a more sustainable solution. The ongoing collaboration between HJF Transports and Shell is characterised as a true partnership, with Shell incorporating customer requests and operational realities into the development of new services. HJF Transports plans to expand its LNG-powered fleet, leveraging Shell’s growing pan-European LNG network facilitated by the Shell LNG card [46]. The company’s proactive approach demonstrates its dedication to a sustainable business model amidst the challenges of rising diesel costs and environmental responsibility (see Figure 3).

Figure 3.

HJT vehicle fleet and Shell LNG plant (source: [46]).

Likewise, according to the Foresignt [47], Low Carbon Logistics (LRC) research has significantly influenced UK government policies, transforming the official approach to carbon auditing road freight transport [47]. It has offered guidance to the industry on measuring and managing CO2 emissions, establishing the industry and government-endorsed target to reduce the carbon intensity of road freight transport. Responding to this research, the Freight Transport Association (FTA) initiated the Logistics Carbon Reduction Scheme (LCRS) in 2010. Collaborating with the FTA, the LRC adapted its freight decarbonisation model to meet LCRS needs and assessed how the UK road freight system should transform to achieve the CO2 reduction target set by the 2008 Climate Change Act.

The research’s impact is evident in various arenas, including influencing the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)'s 2050 Pathways Analysis, which relied on LRC’s work for setting emission levels. The LRC’s freight decarbonisation model played a pivotal role in shaping the Fourth Carbon Budget by the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), contributing to the UK’s efforts to tackle climate change. Additionally, the LRC’s analytical framework for assessing logistics-related externalities at a country level has been adopted and refined by large EU-funded projects and applied in reports for the UK Commission for Integrated Transport. Furthermore, the LRC’s research scrutinised CO2 emissions from road haulage operations, prompting methodological changes in compiling CO2 data for the National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory. The research demonstrated that decarbonising the road freight sector might be less challenging than anticipated. Notably, the LRC’s work has influenced industry practices, government policies, and international initiatives, showcasing its multifaceted and profound impact on the road freight sector’s journey towards decarbonisation.

6.2 Lessons learned

The road freight sector, a linchpin in global trade, faces a transformative shift towards sustainability due to environmental concerns like carbon emissions and air pollution. Global initiatives are underway to usher in ecologically conscious practices, encompassing technological integration, collaborative efforts, regulatory backing, and innovative financial models. Workforce training, gender equality, lifecycle assessment, sustainability metrics, and adaptability are also crucial dimensions. Electric vehicles (EVs) are key to reducing carbon emissions. Azapagic and Perdan [48] emphasise electric trucks and vans powered by batteries or hydrogen fuel cells as alternatives to diesel. Hybrid systems, combining internal combustion engines with electric power, enhance fuel efficiency. Fuel-efficient technologies, aerodynamic enhancements, lightweight materials, and advanced engine management systems optimise fuel consumption. Telematics and connectivity solutions use real-time data analytics for efficient fleet management. Autonomous vehicles offer increased efficiency and reduced fuel consumption.

Exploring alternative fuels like compressed and liquefied natural gas provides cleaner-burning options. In urban logistics, electric cargo bikes and drones reduce congestion and emissions. Successful decarbonisation relies on strategic technology selection, adaptability, investment planning, financial viability, data-driven decision-making, stakeholder collaboration, employee training, change management, regulatory compliance, scalability, replicability, continuous improvement, and innovation. Selecting technologies based on operational needs, adapting to innovations, and conducting thorough assessments contribute to successful integration. Infrastructure planning and collaboration are crucial for an accessible charging network. Real-time data analytics and predictive modelling optimise routes and reduce energy consumption. Investing in training programs, robust financial planning, and supportive regulations are key factors for success. Collaboration with stakeholders, continuous monitoring of technology performance, flexibility, life cycle assessments, and transparent sustainability metrics enhance stakeholder trust. Pilot programs assessing feasibility and effectiveness contribute to widespread impact. Lessons from successful initiatives underscore the importance of these factors in the road freight sector’s journey towards decarbonisation.

6.3 Future outlook

The future of road freight decarbonisation holds promise with the integration of emerging technologies and anticipated policy developments. This outlook envisions a transformative shift towards sustainable practices, driven by advancements in technology and a supportive policy landscape.

6.3.1 Emerging technologies

The electric vehicle (EV) landscape is set for rapid growth, fuelled by advancements in batteries, improved charging infrastructure, and increased energy density (see Figure 4). Solid-state batteries and fast-charging technologies, highlighted by Rai et al. [49], promise to enhance the viability of EVs in road freight. Meanwhile, the integration of autonomous and connected technologies, as discussed by Thomopoulos et al. [50], is poised to revolutionise route planning and fleet efficiency. Ongoing research into alternative fuels like green hydrogen and advanced biofuels, along with innovations in propulsion systems, offers credible substitutes for traditional diesel. The potential of hydrogen fuel cells and improved engine designs plays a pivotal role in achieving carbon-neutral road freight, according to Kühnbach et al. [51].

Figure 4.

An overhead centenary implementation of ERS. Source: Siemens Mobility GmbH, 2022, as cited in [19].

6.3.2 Anticipated policy development

The future policy landscape is expected to introduce stricter global emission standards for road freight vehicles, fostering the adoption of cleaner technologies and penalising carbon-intensive practices [26]. Governments are likely to provide increased incentives and subsidies for the transition to low-emission and zero-emission vehicles, particularly in areas like fleet electrification, charging infrastructure development, and sustainable transportation research [23]. Anticipated policies also suggest a shift towards integrated multimodal transportation solutions, promoting a balanced combination of road, rail, and waterway transport to reduce the overall carbon footprint [38]. Looking ahead, a collaborative approach leveraging emerging technologies and evolving policies, especially the convergence of electric and autonomous vehicles, is poised to drive innovation in the road freight sector, contributing significantly to global decarbonisation efforts.

Advertisement

7. Discussion and conclusion

7.1 Discussion

The chapter presents a stimulating analysis of the intricate aspects surrounding the sustainability of road freight. Employing a conceptual review method, it sheds light on key concepts, emerging trends, and critical gaps, delivering a nuanced exploration of sustainability concerns within the road freight sector. Commencing with the establishment of a clear understanding of sustainability within the context of road freight, the chapter engages with seminal works and contemporary literature to delve into the conceptualisation and application of sustainability. This not only lays the foundation for subsequent discussions but also emphasises the significance of defining sustainability in the evolving landscape of freight transportation.

A pivotal facet of the chapter involves the identification and analysis of diverse strategies for decarbonising road freight, categorised into technological, operational, and policy-driven interventions [25, 37, 43]. The implications extend beyond immediate environmental concerns, encompassing the socio-economic dimension of the freight sector and stressing the necessity for a multifaceted approach in addressing challenges posed by carbon emissions. The exploration of the economic dimension enriches the discourse by spotlighting the financial implications for stakeholders in the road freight sector [28]. This economic scrutiny aligns with the broader discourse on the green economy, highlighting the imperative of sustainable practices that strike a balance between environmental and economic considerations [37].

Moreover, the chapter critically assesses the environmental consequences of road freight decarbonisation efforts, utilising lifecycle assessment, carbon footprint analyses, and ecological impact studies [24, 40, 41, 48]. The implications extend beyond immediate environmental impact, contributing to the broader discourse on sustainable practices in transportation and emphasising the interconnectedness of environmental concerns with global sustainability goals. By scrutinising the role of policies and regulations, the chapter underscores the significance of government intervention in shaping road freight decarbonisation [21, 44]. This aligns with broader literature discussing the regulatory framework’s role in promoting sustainable practices across industries, emphasising the need for collaborative efforts between policymakers and industry stakeholders. The identification and discussion of challenges and opportunities associated with road freight decarbonisation add a layer of realism to the conceptual exploration [26, 37, 42, 45]. This discussion aligns with broader literature on sustainability marked by both obstacles and potential breakthroughs.

Furthermore, the incorporation of diverse stakeholder perspectives enriches the conceptual understanding of road freight decarbonisation [31, 33, 35, 46, 47]. This emphasis on stakeholder engagement resonates with broader discussions in the literature on the importance of inclusive decision-making processes for effective sustainability initiatives. In summary, the implications of the issues covered in this chapter resonate with broader literature on sustainable transportation, green logistics, and the global shift towards more eco-friendly practices [37]. The interconnectedness of environmental, economic, and social aspects aligns with the holistic approach advocated in the broader literature [33, 37]. Against this backdrop, the implications highlighted underscore the urgency of addressing road freight sustainability as an integral part of broader global sustainability efforts.

7.2 Conclusion and direction for future studies

In the quest for a sustainable future in road freight, this chapter underscores the complex nature of decarbonisation, emphasising the need to tailor strategies to specific regional and industry contexts while integrating innovation and community engagement. The findings advocate for comprehensive approaches, highlighting the importance of clear reporting, sustainability metrics, and cross-cultural understanding to facilitate effective road freight adaptations. The review serves as a guiding resource, steering stakeholders towards collaborative solutions and stressing the necessity to customise decarbonisation efforts across diverse regions, industries, and operational contexts. Industry-specific approaches, aligned with operational environments, are deemed crucial for ensuring supply chain resilience. The roles of technological integration, cultural awareness, community engagement, and sustainability metrics are pivotal in optimising the environmental impact of road freight [37].

The future study agenda recommends prioritising tailored strategies for different regions, industries, and operational contexts to enhance the efficacy of decarbonisation initiatives, streamline logistics, and address specific challenges across diverse settings. The comprehensive research dimensions include investigating regional variations, analysing industry-specific adaptations, assessing operational environment considerations, scrutinising cross-cultural perspectives, and evaluating the integration of sustainability metrics using mainly qualitative research approach to help map the ‘how’ issues affecting road freight decarbonisation. Additionally, the chapter calls for future research to encompass emissions quantification, lessons learned transferability, sustainability beyond carbon reduction, ongoing commitment to learning, obstacle navigation, benchmarking, inspiration for similar efforts, and examining advocacy resulting from successful initiatives. In summary, adopting a multidimensional research approach is crucial for comprehensively addressing regional, industry-specific, and operational variations, contributing to the development of targeted and context-specific strategies for sustainable road freight practices globally.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

Sincere appreciation to Dr. Anthony Whiteing, Professor Edward Sweeney, and Professor Jeffery Bray for their invaluable guidance and mentorship during the formulation of this chapter. The authors acknowledge the use of Chat GPT-3.5 for the language polishing of the manuscript.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1. Churchman P, Dekker T, Pangbourne K. Transition codesign for purposive road freight decarbonisation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2023;125:103980
  2. 2. Hossain M et al. Narrowing fossil fuel consumption in the Indian road transport sector towards reaching carbon neutrality. Energy Policy. 2023;172:113330
  3. 3. Ma X et al. Application of fuel cell and alternative fuel for the decarbonisation of China's road freight sector towards carbon neutral. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024;49:263-275
  4. 4. Gomez VJ et al., An Analysis of Trends and Policies Supporting Alternative Fuels for Road Freight Transport in Europe. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2022;10:897916
  5. 5. Zhang X, Plant E, Valantasis Kanellos N. An evaluation of ireland’s sustainable freight transport policy. Logistics. 2022;6(3):65
  6. 6. de las Nieves Camacho M, Jurburg D, Tanco M. Hydrogen fuel cell heavy-duty trucks: Review of main research topics. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022;47(68):29505-29525
  7. 7. Masson-Delmotte V, et al. Global Warming of 1.5 C: IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press. 2022
  8. 8. Haugen MJ et al. Electrification versus hydrogen for UK road freight: Conclusions from a systems analysis of transport energy transitions. Energy for Sustainable Development. 2022;68:203-210
  9. 9. Melo PC. Driving down road transport CO2 emissions in Scotland. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2016;10(10):906-916
  10. 10. Barton JP, Thomson M. Solar power and energy storage for decarbonisation of land transport in India. Energies. 2021;14(24):8277
  11. 11. Munoz MN, Ballantyne EE, Stone DA. Assessing the economic impact of introducing localised PV solar energy generation and energy storage for fleet electrification. Energies. 2023;16(8):3570
  12. 12. Pardhi S et al. A review of fuel cell powertrains for long-haul heavy-duty vehicles: Technology, hydrogen, energy and thermal management solutions. Energies. 2022;15(24):9557
  13. 13. Lee S, Kim BG. Attribute of big data analytics quality affecting business performance. Journal of Social Computing. 2023;4(4):357-381
  14. 14. Onu D, Kessler T, Smith JR. Admiration: A conceptual review. Emotion Review. 2016;8(3):218-230
  15. 15. de Saxe C et al. High-capacity coal trucks to reduce costs and emissions at South Africa's power utility. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2022;48:100898
  16. 16. Zhang L et al. Design and optimisation of compressor for a fuel cell system on a commercial truck under real driving conditions. In: 15th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging. Howick Place, London: CRC Press; 2023
  17. 17. Rohith G et al. Sustainable heavy goods vehicle electrification strategies for long-haul road freight transportation. IEEE Access. 2023;11:26459-26470
  18. 18. Rosenberg E et al. Modelling the interaction between the energy system and road freight in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2023;114:103569
  19. 19. Deshpande P et al. A breakeven cost analysis framework for electric road systems. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2023;122:103870
  20. 20. Capros P et al. Model-based analysis of decarbonising the EU economy in the time horizon to 2050. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2012;1(2):76-84
  21. 21. Sharmina M et al. Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5-2 C. Climate Policy. 2021;21(4):455-474
  22. 22. Churchman P, Longhurst N. Where is our delivery? The political and socio-technical roadblocks to decarbonising United Kingdom road freight. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022;83:102330
  23. 23. Anita WM et al. Interplay of climate change and air pollution-projection of the under-5 mortality attributable to ambient particulate matter (PM2. 5) in South Asia. Environmental Research. 2024;21:118292
  24. 24. Hawkins TR et al. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2013;17(1):53-64
  25. 25. Askin AC et al. The heavy-duty vehicle future in the United States: A parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs. Energy Policy. 2015;81:1-13
  26. 26. Barsali S et al. Managing BEV charge to obtain a positive impact on a national power system. Energies. 2024;17(2):348
  27. 27. Proost S, Van Dender K. What long-term road transport future? Trends and policy options. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2011;5:44-65
  28. 28. Yuan Z, Bi J, Moriguichi Y. The circular economy: A new development strategy in China. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2006;10(1-2):4-8
  29. 29. Merchan AL et al. Life cycle externalities versus external costs: The case of inland freight transport in Belgium. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2019;67:576-595
  30. 30. Saravia de los Reyes R et al. Carbon footprint of a port infrastructure from a life cycle approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(20):7414
  31. 31. Mekong-Institute. Guidelines for Enhancing Freight Efficiency in ASEAN. 2015. Available from: https://www.mekonginstitute.org/what-we-do/ongoing-projects/greenfreightandlogisticsdevelopmentinmekongcountries/
  32. 32. Allen J et al. The role of urban consolidation centres in sustainable freight transport. Transport Reviews. 2012;32(4):473-490
  33. 33. US-Department-of-Energy. Idle Reduction for Heavy-Duty Trucks: A Way to Reduce Fuel Use and Emissions. 2016. Available from: https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/2016-results
  34. 34. Pan S et al. The air quality and health impacts of projected long-haul truck and rail freight transportation in the United States in 2050. Environment International. 2019;130:104922
  35. 35. McKinsey-Company. The Road to Sustainable Urban Logistics. 2019. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/about-us/new-at-mckinsey-blog/top-ten-insights-of-2019
  36. 36. Allaoui H et al. Reducing transportation greenhouse gas emissions with collaborative distribution. Management Research Review. 2015;38(10):1049-1067
  37. 37. McKinnon A et al. Green Logistics: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics. London: Kogan Page Publishers; 2015
  38. 38. ITF. Towards Geater Resilience. 2015. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/trust-fund-annual-report-2021
  39. 39. Seifert C et al. Life cycle assessment as decision support tool for environmental management in hospitals: A literature review. Health Care Management Review. 2021;46(1):12-24
  40. 40. Axsen J, Hardman S, Jenn A. What do we know about zero-emission vehicle mandates? Environmental Science & Technology. 2022;56(12):7553-7563
  41. 41. Li X et al. Optimal design of pure battery electric bus system on the grid network. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science. 2022;20:1-34
  42. 42. Ezenwa A et al. Factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion in Nigeria's transport logistics industry: An exploratory study. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management. 2020;13(2-3):252-276
  43. 43. Ezenwa A et al. Development of strategies to improve information communication technology diffusion in Nigeria's logistics and transport industry: Adaptation of structure-process-outcome model. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management. 2021;14(4):363-391
  44. 44. Holguín-Veras J. Impacts of Freight Parking Policies in Urban Areas: The Case of New York City. New York: University Transportation Research Center - Region. 2016;2:40
  45. 45. IEA, Global EV Outlook, I.E. Agency, editors. 2023. Available from: https://www.iea.org/topics/global-ev-outlook
  46. 46. Shell-CRT. Shell CRT news, reports & case studies. Shell. 2023. Available from: https://www.shell.com/business-customers/shell-commercial-road-transport/news-and-casestudies.html
  47. 47. Foresignt, Future of Mobility: Decarbonising road freight [Internet]. G.O.f. Science, editor. 2019. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c6fe3b040f0b647af8f35e2/decarbonising_road_freight.pdf
  48. 48. Azapagic A, Perdan S. Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2000;78(4):243-261
  49. 49. Rai HB et al. Improving urban freight transport sustainability: Policy assessment framework and case study. Research in Transportation Economics. 2017;64:26-35
  50. 50. Thomopoulos N et al. All work and no play? Autonomous vehicles and non-commuting journeys. Transport Reviews. 2021;41(4):456-477
  51. 51. Kühnbach M et al. Impact of electric vehicles: Will German households pay less for electricity? Energy Strategy Reviews. 2020;32:100568

Written By

Anthony E. Ezenwa, Akunna Oledinma, Martin Osei, Obiajulu Ede, Christopher Ikeogu and Nze Ibeawuchi

Submitted: 01 January 2024 Reviewed: 21 January 2024 Published: 08 July 2024