Open access

Introductory Chapter: Motor Neurons – New Insights

Written By

Kamila Saramak and Natalia Szejko

Published: 19 June 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.115015

From the Edited Volume

Motor Neurons - New Insights

Edited by Natalia Szejko and Kamila Saramak

Chapter metrics overview

16 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a group of progressive neurodegenerative disorders associated with the degradation of the upper (UMN) and lower motor neurons (LMN), without affecting sensory and autonomic systems [1]. MNDs can be classified based on the pattern of motor neuron involvement; they encompass pure LMN syndromes, mixed upper and lower motor neuron diseases, and pure UMN syndromes [2]. MNDs patients display a large heterogeneity of clinical symptoms, including muscular weakness, atrophy, and corticospinal tract signs in varying combinations and severities, presenting a unique diagnostic challenge to clinicians [3]. In this chapter, we provide an overview of MNDs, in particular amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), and hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) [2].

Advertisement

2. Lower motor neuron (LMN) syndromes

The pure LMN syndromes are characterized by a selective degeneration of the anterior horn cells in the spinal cord and the motor nuclei in the brain stem, which inevitably leads to muscle weakness, atrophy, and fasciculations. They encompass spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), which is also known as Kennedy’s disease [4]. Progressive muscular atrophy (PMA) will be described together with ALS [5].

2.1 Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

SMA is an autosomal recessive disease with a prevalence of 1 per 10,000 live born infants. It is most often related to mutations in the Survival Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, which encodes SMN, a protein essential for the development and survival of motor neurons. A paralogous gene, SMN2, also encodes the SMN protein but produces considerably less of it. SMA is associated with the degradation of anterior horn cells in the spinal cord and motor nuclei in the brain stem, producing weakness of limb, trunk, bulbar, and respiratory muscles [6]. SMA can be classified into five types (SMA 0–IV) according to age of onset and its clinical course. The beginning of symptoms varies from before birth (type 0) to adulthood (type IV) [7]. SMA type 0 is the rarest and the most severe form of SMA, usually resulting in death due to respiratory failure and bulbar deterioration within the first month of life. SMA type I is the most common form, accounting for approximately 60% of SMA cases, and, if not treated, leads to death by 2 years of age. The other SMA variants (II, III, and IV) are usually less debilitating [6].

The three relatively new therapies (nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam) have proven to be effective in slowing the progression of SMA. The first milestone has been reached with the discovery of nusinersen (marketed as Spinraza®), a modified antisense oligonucleotide drug that influences the splicing of the SMN2 pre-messenger RNA and thus enhances the expression of the full-length SMN protein. The intrathecal administration of nusinersen prolongs survival and significantly enhances the motor function both in pediatric and adult SMA patients [8, 9]. Onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®) was the first single-dose gene-replacement SMA therapy approved in the USA and Europe [10]. The third drug, risdiplam (Evrysdi®), is a molecule that binds the SMN2 pre-mRNA in two locations, consequently increasing levels of the functional SMN protein. Risdiplam administered orally significantly increases survival and leads to motor improvement of patients with SMA compared with a natural history cohort [11, 12]. Numerous clinical trials and real-world data support the efficacy and safety profiles of the available drugs, which are meanwhile becoming new standards of therapy and may redefine the natural course of the disease. Nevertheless, there is still a number of important issues that need to be addressed, such as lack of evidence regarding superiority of one product compared to the others and combined therapies [13, 14].

In addition, stem cell-based treatments have shown the potential to repair the injured tissue and differentiate into neurons in animal models of SMA. Its therapeutic clinical translation, however, remains a challenge and requires further investigations [15, 16].

2.2 Spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA)

SBMA is characterized by progressive weakness and atrophy of the proximal limb and bulbar muscles. The disease has its onset in adulthood, progresses much slower than other MNDs, and is X-linked. It is caused by a CAG repeat expansion in the androgen receptor gene and therefore affects exclusively males [17]. The life span of individuals with SBMA is typically normal; some patients, nonetheless, may be constrained to wheelchairs 15–20 years after symptom onset. Moreover, SMBA patients often show hormonal disturbances like gynecomastia, testicular atrophy, and reduced fertility [18]. Despite collaborative effort in developing therapeutic strategies, no curative treatment has been found up to this date. The latest preclinical studies focus on modifying the activity of androgen receptor (AR) in a selective manner [19].

Advertisement

3. Mixed upper and lower motor neuron diseases

3.1 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)

The term “motor neuron disease” encompasses, among others, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), which with its prevalence of about 5.5–9.9 per 100,000 persons is the most frequent form of MND [20, 21]. ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, is believed to have a large genetic component; hence, its prevalence depends strongly on the study population, being higher in Australia, Europe, and North America, than in Asia [22]. The disease is more common in men than in women, especially in the younger groups of patients with ALS [23]. In most individuals with ALS, symptoms first appear in the sixth decade of life [24]. There are, however, other rare presentations of the disease. “Juvenile ALS,” which is typically associated with a positive family history and slow progression, starts before 25 years of age, whereas the patients with sporadic “young-onset ALS” develop symptoms before reaching 45 years of age [25, 26].

In ALS, neuronal degeneration typically occurs in the cortex (UMN), as well as in the brain stem and the spinal cord (LMN) [27]. The majority of ALS patients present with limb onset of the disease, whereas bulbar onset of ALS occurs in up to 30% of the patients [28]. The disease progresses rapidly, spreading to various body regions, including respiratory muscles, causing death within 2–3 years for the bulbar onset cases and 3–5 years for the limb onset cases [27]. Recent studies regarding disease progression have led to a development of the model to predict survival without tracheostomy and noninvasive ventilation depending on a number of individual factors [29]. An overview of clinical spectrum of the most important ALS phenotypes is shown in Table 1.

PhenotypeAffected motor neuronsImportant features
Classical spinal onset (Charcot’s type)UMN + LMNasymmetric weakness in a limb, which progresses to a contralateral limb or to other spinal and/or bulbar areas
Flail arm (Vulpian-Bernhardt’s type)LMN in UEs, UMN in LEspredominantly proximal, progressive and symmetric wasting, and paresis of the upper limb muscles, while lower limbs and bulbar muscles are spared; occasionally present UMN signs in the legs
Flail leg (Marie-Patrikios’ type, or a peroneal form of ALS)LMN in LEsasymmetric weakness confined to the lumbosacral spinal cord region that spreads to cervical and lumbar regions
Progressive bulbar palsyLMNthe onset of dysarthria or dysphagia with bulbar muscle atrophy and fasciculations, with progression to the limbs
Pseudobulbar palsyUMNthe onset of dysarthria or dysphagia with emotional lability with progression to the limbs, no bulbar muscle atrophy and no fasciculations
Progressive muscular atrophyLMNclinically isolated LMN syndrome typically starting in distal limb muscles in an asymmetric manner and spreading over months or years; some patients develop ALS with UMN signs
Primary lateral sclerosisUMNtypically symmetrical onset with UMN signs in the lower limbs, many patients with PLS develop lower motor neuron signs within 4 years of symptom onset
Hemiplegic formUMNdisease onset with unilateral UMN involvement, slow progression to the contralateral side; after a variable period evolution to ALS with LMN signs
Respiratory formUMN + LMNrespiratory involvement followed by limb weakness

Table 1.

An overview of clinical spectrum of the most important ALS phenotypes.

UMN: upper motor neuron; LMN: lower motor neuron; UE: upper extremity; LE: lower extremity; ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; and PLS: primary lateral sclerosis.

The original diagnostic criteria for ALS were defined at El Escorial in 1990 and revised multiple times [30]. In 2019, the Gold Coast criteria were developed, increasing the diagnostic sensitivity for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [31, 32]. The diagnosis of ALS remains fundamentally clinical and relies on the medical history and physical examination. Electrodiagnostic testing with needle electromyography (EMG) and neuroimaging have been useful adjunctive tools in the diagnostic process. EMG provides evidence of LMN involvement, also at subclinical stages, revealing signs of acute denervation like fibrillation potentials, positive sharp waves, and fasciculations. Unfortunately, in cases of UMN-predominant ALS, particularly those with bulbar onset, its sensitivity is still unsatisfactory [33]. Brain and spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging is recommended in order to exclude structural lesions like infarct, cervical radiculomyelopathy, syrinx, demyelination, or neoplasm [34, 35]. Moreover, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG) may reveal a typical pattern of perirolandic and prefrontal hypometabolism [36, 37]. Furthermore, several serum and cerebrospinal fluid molecules, such as neurofilament light chain (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNfH), are emerging as potential diagnostic and prognostic ALS biomarkers [38].

Genetics plays an important role in the pathophysiology of ALS; in fact, more than forty genes contributing to familial (fALS) and sporadic ALS (sALS) have been identified up to date [39]. The familial form of ALS constitutes up to 10% of disease cases. Familial ALS is most frequently caused by mutations in C9orf72, superoxide dismutase 1 gene (SOD1), fused of the sarcoma (FUS), and TARDBP gene [40]. The pattern of inheritance depends on the gene involved and in most cases is autosomal dominant. Mutations in the same genes are also found in sALS patients, but at considerably lower frequencies [41]. The studies of ALS at the molecular level have indicated cytoplasmic aggregation of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), a protein encoded by TARDBP, as the most common ALS neuropathology, present in more than 95% of cases [42]. Except for accumulation of misfolded or aggregated proteins, other cellular processes like oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inflammation can result in the loss of neurons in ALS [43]. Similar abnormalities at the genetic and molecular level have been described in patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) [44]. In fact, around 15% of ALS patients meet the criteria of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and conversely, up to 15% of FTD patients develop ALS [45, 46]. In fact, ALS and FTD may be considered one disease, with ALS representing predominantly motor phenotype and FTD cognitive phenotype [47].

Significant discoveries in genetics research has brought a better understanding of ALS pathogenesis over recent years, which is crucial for the development of disease-modifying and curative therapies in the future [48]. At this point, riluzole remains the only widely approved drug for the treatment of ALS. Riluzole exerts inhibitory effects on the glutamatergic system, which prevents neuronal dysfunction and death called “excitotoxicity.” Unfortunately, the benefit is very limited, and riluzole can extend the average survival time by only 3 months [49]. Another drug, edaravone, is a free radical scavenger that reduces oxidative stress. The first clinical trials conducted in Japan and in the USA have shown that the treatment with edaravone may prolong survival up to 6 months, leading to the approval of the drug by several countries [50, 51]. Unfortunately, its beneficial clinical effects have not been confirmed in European cohorts [52, 53]. The third available drug, AMX0035, is a combination of two compounds—tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) and sodium phenylbutyrate (PB)—and is believed to increase the threshold for cell death by blocking key cell death pathways. After promising results of the first randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of AMX0035 in ALS (CENTAUR), in which the treatment with AMX0035 led to both functional and survival benefits in ALS patients, the drug has been approved in the USA and Canada [54]. The collaborative research efforts do not stop, and there are many experimental therapies in development, targeting, among others, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, protein homeostasis, and neuroinflammation [55]. Furthermore, cannabis-based medicine has been gaining increasing attention as a potential therapeutic agent for many neurological conditions, including ALS [56, 57, 58].

Advertisement

4. Upper motor neuron (UMN) syndromes

Pure upper motor neuron (UMN) syndromes comprise PLS, which as a phenotype of ALS was mentioned above, and hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). PLS clinically overlaps with (UMN)-predominant ALS and HSP, posing a diagnostic challenge to the clinicians. Nevertheless, HSP compared to PLS is more frequently associated with the presence of a family history, the earlier and symmetric onset of the disease, diminished vibratory sensation, the absence of bulbar involvement, and slower disease progression [59].

4.1 Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP)

Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) describes a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative diseases with a complex genetic background of more than 70 genetic variants recognized, with all possible patterns of inheritance reported [39]. Between 13 and 40% of cases occur, however, with no family history [60]. Clinically, the “pure” form of HSP is marked by progressive spasticity of the lower limbs, whereas “complex” variants of HSP encompass additional disturbances, including dementia, cognitive delay, epilepsy, neuropathy, and others. The disease can present in infancy, childhood, adolescence, or adulthood. Nonetheless, the more common autosomal-dominant types manifest between the second and third decades [61].

Autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia 4 (SPG4) is the most prevalent form of HSP. Among the autosomal-recessive forms, SPG11 is the most frequent and associated with a “complex” phenotype [62]. Disease progression in HSP individuals is overall slow. Late disease onset and SPG11 form are associated with a higher disease severity and earlier loss of independent walking. The diagnosis of HSP is made based on clinical features, genetic testing, and neuroimaging. Despite the wide attainability of the next-generation sequencing-based HSP gene panels, a genetic diagnosis is not made in up to 71% of all suspected cases of HSP [60].

Up to this date, no specific HSP modifying therapy is available [63]. Oral antispasmodics, including baclofen and tizanidine, have an established role in the management of spasticity; another promising oral treatment option is fampridine (4-aminopyridine) [64]. In more severe cases, the administration of intrathecal baclofen may be used to alleviate spasticity and improve gait [65]. Sadly, despite great progress in unraveling the genetics of HSP, no substantial advances in developing gene-specific therapy have been achieved [39].

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

Over the last decades, considerable efforts have been made to unfold the underlying pathophysiology of MNDs and find novel therapeutic modalities. Yet MNDs present a unique challenge to researchers and clinicians. The approval of three efficacious and safe therapies (nusinersen, risdiplam, and onasemnogene abeparvovec) led to a breakthrough in the management of SMA. With regard to ALS, diagnostic and prognostic procedures have remained relatively unchanged, apart from genetic testing. Neurofilament light chain and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain have emerged as possible diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of the ALS patients. On the other hand, as NfL and pNfH levels are elevated in many neurodegenerative diseases, their clinical utility might be insufficient. Available treatment options for ALS are limited and not curative. Three disease modifying drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), including riluzole, edaravone, and AMX0035. Due to contradictory results in clinical trials, edaravone and AMX0035 have not been approved in most of the European countries. Currently, the multidisciplinary supportive care provided by medical practitioners in neurology, pulmonology, gastroenterology, rehabilitation, and palliative care continues to be the core stone of MND management. Our book aims to discuss the latest developments in the field of MNDs.

References

  1. 1. Foster LA, Salajegheh MK. Motor neuron disease: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. The American Journal of Medicine. 2019;132:32-37
  2. 2. Statland JM, Barohn RJ, McVey AL, Katz JS, Dimachkie M. Patterns of weakness, classification of motor neuron disease, and clinical diagnosis of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurologic Clinics. 2015;33:735-748
  3. 3. Barp A, Sansone VA, Lunetta C. Challenges in diagnosis of motor neuron disease: A case series of ALS mimic syndromes. Revue Neurologique. 2021;177:699-706
  4. 4. de Carvalho M, Swash M. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MND/ALS: IFCN Handbook Chapter. In: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. The Netherlands, Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2024;9:27-38
  5. 5. Kim W-K, Liu X, Sandner J, Pasmantier M, Andrews J, Rowland L, et al. Study of 962 patients indicates progressive muscular atrophy is a form of ALS. Neurology. 2009;73:1686-1692
  6. 6. Mercuri E, Sumner CJ, Muntoni F, Darras BT, Finkel RS. Spinal muscular atrophy. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2022;8:52
  7. 7. Wirth B, Karakaya M, Kye MJ, Mendoza-Ferreira N. Twenty-five years of spinal muscular atrophy research: From phenotype to genotype to therapy, and what comes next. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2020;21:231-261
  8. 8. Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378:625-635
  9. 9. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, Connolly AM, Kuntz NL, Kirschner J, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377:1723-1732
  10. 10. Day JW, Finkel RS, Chiriboga CA, Connolly AM, Crawford TO, Darras BT, et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for symptomatic infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy in patients with two copies of SMN2 (STR1VE): An open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Neurology. 2021;20:284-293
  11. 11. Baranello G, Darras BT, Day JW, Deconinck N, Klein A, Masson R, et al. Risdiplam in type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384:915-923
  12. 12. Darras BT, Masson R, Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M, Rose K, Xiong H, Zanoteli E, et al. Risdiplam-treated infants with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy versus historical controls. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385:427-435
  13. 13. Antonaci L, Pera MC, Mercuri E. New therapies for spinal muscular atrophy: Where we stand and what is next. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2023;182:2935-2942
  14. 14. Oechsel KF, Cartwright MS. Combination therapy with onasemnogene and risdiplam in spinal muscular atrophy type 1. Muscle & Nerve. 2021;64:487-490
  15. 15. Shaw SW, Peng S-Y, Liang C-C, Lin T-Y, Cheng P-J, Hsieh T-T, et al. Prenatal transplantation of human amniotic fluid stem cell could improve clinical outcome of type III spinal muscular atrophy in mice. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:9158
  16. 16. Han F, Ebrahimi-Barough S, Abolghasemi R, Ai J, Liu Y. Cell-based therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. In: Stem Cell-based Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Singapore: Springer; 2020;1266:117-125
  17. 17. Rhodes LE, Freeman BK, Auh S, Kokkinis AD, La Pean A, Chen C, et al. Clinical features of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Brain. 2009;132:3242-3251
  18. 18. Sperfeld AD, Karitzky J, Brummer D, Schreiber H, Häussler J, Ludolph AC, et al. X-linked bulbospinal neuronopathy: Kennedy disease. Archives of Neurology. 2002;59:1921-1926
  19. 19. Badders NM, Korff A, Miranda HC, Vuppala PK, Smith RB, Winborn BJ, et al. Selective modulation of the androgen receptor AF2 domain rescues degeneration in spinal bulbar muscular atrophy. Nature Medicine. 2018;24:427-437
  20. 20. Mehta P, Raymond J, Punjani R, Han M, Larson T, Kaye W, et al. Prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the United States using established and novel methodologies. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2017;2022:1-9
  21. 21. Park J, Kim J-E, Song T-J. The global burden of motor neuron disease: An analysis of the 2019 global burden of disease study. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13:864339
  22. 22. Xu L, Liu T, Liu L, Yao X, Chen L, Fan D, et al. Global variation in prevalence and incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology. 2020;267:944-953
  23. 23. Marin B, Boumédiene F, Logroscino G, Couratier P, Babron M-C, Leutenegger AL, et al. Variation in worldwide incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A meta-analysis. International journal of epidemiology. 2017;46:57-74
  24. 24. Arthur KC, Calvo A, Price TR, Geiger JT, Chio A, Traynor BJ. Projected increase in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from 2015 to 2040. Nature Communications. 2016;7:12408
  25. 25. Turner MR, Barnwell J, Al-Chalabi A, Eisen A. Young-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Historical and other observations. Brain. 2012;135:2883-2891
  26. 26. Chiò A, Calvo A, Moglia C, Mazzini L, Mora G. Phenotypic heterogeneity of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population based study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2011;82:740-746
  27. 27. Fujimura-Kiyono C, Kimura F, Ishida S, Nakajima H, Hosokawa T, Sugino M, et al. Onset and spreading patterns of lower motor neuron involvements predict survival in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2011;82:1244-1249
  28. 28. Stegmann GM, Hahn S, Liss J, Shefner J, Rutkove S, Shelton K, et al. Early detection and tracking of bulbar changes in ALS via frequent and remote speech analysis. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2020;3:132
  29. 29. Westeneng H-J, Debray TP, Visser AE, van Eijk RP, Rooney JP, Calvo A, et al. Prognosis for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Development and validation of a personalised prediction model. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17:423-433
  30. 30. Ludolph A, Drory V, Hardiman O, Nakano I, Ravits J, Robberecht W, et al. A revision of the El Escorial criteria-2015. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis & Frontotemporal Degeneration. 2015;16:291-292
  31. 31. Turner MR. Diagnosing ALS: The Gold Coast criteria and the role of EMG. Practical Neurology. 2022;22:176-178
  32. 32. Pugdahl K, Camdessanché J-P, Cengiz B, de Carvalho M, Liguori R, Rossatto C, et al. Gold Coast diagnostic criteria increase sensitivity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2021;132:3183-3189
  33. 33. Colombo E, Doretti A, Scheveger F, Maranzano A, Pata G, Gagliardi D, et al. Correlation between clinical phenotype and electromyographic parameters in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neurology. 2023;270:511-518
  34. 34. Storti B, Diamanti S, Tremolizzo L, Riva N, Lunetta C, Filippi M, et al. ALS mimics due to affection of the cervical spine: From common compressive myelopathy to rare CSF epidural collection. Case Reports in Neurology. 2021;13:145-156
  35. 35. Kassubek J, Pagani M. Imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: MRI and PET. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2019;32:740-746
  36. 36. Pagani M, Chiò A, Valentini MC, Öberg J, Nobili F, Calvo A, et al. Functional pattern of brain FDG-PET in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2014;83:1067-1074
  37. 37. Van Laere K, Vanhee A, Verschueren J, De Coster L, Driesen A, Dupont P, et al. Value of 18fluorodeoxyglucose–positron-emission tomography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A prospective study. JAMA Neurology. 2014;71:553-561
  38. 38. Steinacker P, Feneberg E, Weishaupt J, Brettschneider J, Tumani H, Andersen PM, et al. Neurofilaments in the diagnosis of motoneuron diseases: A prospective study on 455 patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2016;87:12-20
  39. 39. Shribman S, Reid E, Crosby AH, Houlden H, Warner TT. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: From diagnosis to emerging therapeutic approaches. The Lancet Neurology. 2019;18:1136-1146
  40. 40. Mejzini R, Flynn LL, Pitout IL, Fletcher S, Wilton SD, Akkari PA. ALS genetics, mechanisms, and therapeutics: Where are we now? Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019;13:497022
  41. 41. Van Daele SH, Moisse M, van Vugt JJ, Zwamborn RA, van der Spek R, van Rheenen W, et al. Genetic variability in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain. 2023;146:3760-3769
  42. 42. Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, Truax AC, Micsenyi MC, Chou TT, et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science. 2006;314:130-133
  43. 43. Goutman SA, Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Chió A, Savelieff MG, Kiernan MC, et al. Emerging insights into the complex genetics and pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology. 2022;21:465-479
  44. 44. Burrell JR, Halliday GM, Kril JJ, Ittner LM, Götz J, Kiernan MC, et al. The frontotemporal dementia-motor neuron disease continuum. The Lancet. 2016;388:919-931
  45. 45. Ringholz G, Appel SH, Bradshaw M, Cooke N, Mosnik D, Schulz P. Prevalence and patterns of cognitive impairment in sporadic ALS. Neurology. 2005;65:586-590
  46. 46. Phukan J, Elamin M, Bede P, Jordan N, Gallagher L, Byrne S, et al. The syndrome of cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A population-based study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2012;83:102-108
  47. 47. de Carvalho M. Advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research in 2022. The Lancet Neurology. 2023;22:21-2
  48. 48. Chia R, Chiò A, Traynor B. Novel genes associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Diagnostic and clinical implications. The Lancet Neurology. 2018;17:94-102
  49. 49. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meininger V, Group ARS. A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;330:585-591
  50. 50. Lacomblez L, Bensimon G, Leigh PN, Guillet P, Meininger V. Dose-ranging study of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/Riluzole Study Group II. Lancet. 1996;347:1425-1431
  51. 51. Abe K, Aoki M, Tsuji S, Itoyama Y, Sobue G, Togo M, et al. Safety and efficacy of edaravone in well defined patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology. 2017;16:505-512
  52. 52. Witzel S, Maier A, Steinbach R, Grosskreutz J, Koch JC, Sarikidi A, et al. Safety and effectiveness of long-term intravenous administration of edaravone for treatment of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurology. 2022;79:121-130
  53. 53. Lunetta C, Moglia C, Lizio A, Caponnetto C, Dubbioso R, Giannini F, et al. The Italian multicenter experience with edaravone in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neurology. 2020;267:3258-3267
  54. 54. Paganoni S, Hendrix S, Dickson SP, Knowlton N, Macklin EA, Berry JD, et al. Long-term survival of participants in the CENTAUR trial of sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle & Nerve. 2021;63:31-39
  55. 55. Jiang J, Wang Y, Deng M. New developments and opportunities in drugs being trialed for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Pharmacology;2022:13
  56. 56. Saramak K, Szejko N. Endocannabinoid System as a New Therapeutic Avenue for the Treatment of Huntington’s Disease. In: From Pathophysiology to Treatment of Huntington’s Disease. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2022
  57. 57. Szejko N, Saramak K, Lombroso A, Müller-Vahl K. Cannabis-based medicine in treatment of patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska. 2022;56:28-38
  58. 58. Saramak K, Szejko N. The Endocannabinoid System as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Motor Neurons – New Insights. London, UK: Intech Open; 2024
  59. 59. Fullam T, Statland J. Upper motor neuron disorders: Primary lateral sclerosis, upper motor neuron dominant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain Sciences. 2021;11:611
  60. 60. Schüle R, Wiethoff S, Martus P, Karle KN, Otto S, Klebe S, et al. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: Clinicogenetic lessons from 608 patients. Annals of Neurology. 2016;79:646-658
  61. 61. Harding A. Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias. The Lancet. 1983;321:1151-1155
  62. 62. Varga R-E, Khundadze M, Damme M, Nietzsche S, Hoffmann B, Stauber T, et al. In vivo evidence for lysosome depletion and impaired autophagic clearance in hereditary spastic paraplegia type SPG11. PLoS Genetics. 2015;11:e1005454
  63. 63. Bertolucci F, Di Martino S, Orsucci D, Ienco EC, Siciliano G, Rossi B, et al. Robotic gait training improves motor skills and quality of life in hereditary spastic paraplegia. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36:93-99
  64. 64. Béreau M, Anheim M, Chanson J-B, Tio G, Echaniz-Laguna A, Depienne C, et al. Dalfampridine in hereditary spastic paraplegia: A prospective, open study. Journal of Neurology. 2015;262:1285-1288
  65. 65. Margetis K, Korfias S, Boutos N, Gatzonis S, Themistocleous M, Siatouni A, et al. Intrathecal baclofen therapy for the symptomatic treatment of hereditary spastic paraplegia. Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery. 2014;123:142-145

Written By

Kamila Saramak and Natalia Szejko

Published: 19 June 2024