Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Contamination of Honey: A Human Health Perspective

Written By

Biswajit Patra and Surya Narayan Pradhan

Submitted: 20 November 2022 Reviewed: 20 December 2022 Published: 28 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109613

From the Edited Volume

Health Risks of Food Additives - Recent Developments and Trends in Food Sector

Edited by Muhammad Sajid Arshad and Waseem Khalid

Chapter metrics overview

261 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Honey is utilized not only as a nutritive product but also in health depicted traditional medicine and also substitute treatment for clinical settings ranging from wound curing to tumor treatment. This review emphasizes the capability of honey and its importance in medicinal aspects. Conventionally, honey is used in the treatment of blindness eye problem, respiratory asthma, throat contaminations, tuberculosis, dehydration, hitches, tiredness, shakiness, constipation, eczema, hepatitis, worm plague, piles, ulcers, wounds and used as healthful supplement. The components of honey have been conveyed to exercise antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiproliferative, and antimetastatic properties. Agricultural pesticides effect with antibiotics is a challenging problem in modern collected honey that needs to be addressed. Honey consumed as medicine and their contamination may transfer serious health risks. Honey are polluted by pesticides, heavy metals, and radioactive materials. Pesticide deposits create genetic mutations of healthy cells. Assimilation of honey without significant its source and defensive effect might be challenging. Pure honey should be labeled to discover its composition, origin and strong activities that is unrestricted from pollutants. It also not functional to injuries or used for therapeutic determinations. This paper reviews the health impact and extent of honey contamination. Also discussed the different nanoparticles associated with honey and their characterization.

Keywords

  • contamination
  • heavy metal
  • therapeutic agent
  • health
  • honey

1. Introduction

Honey is the only insect-derived natural product, and it has nutritional, cosmetic, therapeutic, and industrial values. Honey is reviewed as a balanced diet and equally popular for male and female in all ages [1, 2]. Evidence from Stone Age paintings shows treatment of disease with bee product such as honey originated from 8000 years ago. Many research papers have been available about pure and contaminated honey. They characterized the biochemical investigation and commercial utilization. Purified honey was utilized for many disease including eye blindness, throat infections, asthma, tuberculosis, hiccups, thirst, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, hepatitis, worm infestation, eczema, piles, healing of ulcers, and sores in herbal medicine [3]. Pure honey also consists of flavonoids, polyphenols, reducing compounds, alkaloids, glycosides, cardiac glycosides, anthraquinone, and volatile compounds. Many sugars are formed during the honey ripening and maturation times. Gluconic acid, a product of glucose oxidation, is the main organic acid that is present in honey; in addition, small amounts of acetic, formic, and citric have been found [4, 5, 6]. Honey also contains important amino acids, with essential and all nonessential acids excluding for glutamine and asparagine. Proline was described as the principal amino acid in honey, followed by additional amino acids [7]. Several vital trace compounds are noticed in honey, like rubidium (RB), silicon (Si), vanadium (V), lithium (Li), strontium (Sr) and zirconium (Zr). Now a days honey were contaminated by many heavy metals like Pb, Cd, and As act as harmful effect on human health [8]. The volatile compounds of honey are generally low but include aldehydes, alcohols, hydrocarbons, ketones, acid esters, benzene and its derivatives, pyran, terpene and its derivatives, norisoprenoids, as well as sulfur, furan, and cyclic compounds [9, 10, 11]. The most flavonoid and phenolic components in pure honey consist of syringic acid, gallic acid, ellagic acid, cinnamic acid, benzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, isorhamnetin, caffeic acid, ferulic acids, chrysin, naringenin, myricetin, apigenin, coumaric acid, quercetin, hesperetin, kaempferol, galangin, luteolin, and catechin [12, 13].

Advertisement

2. Bioactivities of honey

The capability of pure honey for antioxidant activities is related to the intensity of honey. So, the darker honey has complex rate of antioxidant. It exposed that the phenolic components are the key factor for antioxidant effect of honey. However, the phenolic content is related to radical absorbance effect of pure honey [14]. According to scientific literature, honey applied alone or in combination with conventional therapy might be a new antioxidant in the control of commonly associated with oxidative stress [15]. Many investigations indicated that the antibacterial activity of honey is minimum inhibitory concentration; therefore, honey has the minimum concentration necessary for complete inhibitory growth [16]. Honey increases poly-ADP-ribose- polymerase and caspase 3 activation cleavage in cancer cell lines which contain more phenolic constituent [17]. Furthermore, it makes apoptosis by modulating the appearance of pro- and anti-apoptotic protein in cancer diseases. Venous injection of manuka honey acts as apoptotic activities on cancer cells through the caspase 9 which activates the protein and caspase-3. Manuka honey apoptosis involves in the activation of DNA disintegration and damage of Bcl-2 appearance [18, 19]. The apoptotic activities of honey make it a potential natural ingredient as anticancer agent in several chemotherapeutics. Presently it is utilized as apoptosis inducer agents. Mixed honey and its containments have been designated as parameter of proteins synthesis including tyrosine kinase, ornithine decarboxylase, and COX [20]. Diverse types of mixed herbal honey, contamination free honey are discovered to induce tumor necrosis aspects interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), alpha and IL-6 manufacture [21]. Pure honey induces the generation of many antibodies. Many evidence suggest the use of honey in the control and treatment of acute wounds and for mild to moderate superficial and partial thickness burns [22]. Concerning the limitations related with antioxidants utilization, additional interferences targeted at declining ROS level generation also used as an assistant to predictable diabetes treatment. In various clinical trials of Type 2 and Type 1 mellitus diabetes, the request of honey was related with intensely subordinate glycaemic index with sucrose type 1 or glucose in type 2 diabetes and standard [23, 24]. Polyphenol ingredients of honey quench biological ROS that lead to neurotoxicity, aging, and the pathological deposition of misfolded proteins, including amyloid beta [25]. Raw honey and honey polyphenol reduce the microglia-induced neuroinflammation that is induced through immunogenic neurotoxins or ischemia damage [26]. Several researches propose that the modifications of specific neural circuitry underlies the memory improving and neuropharmacological effects of honey.

Advertisement

3. Honey contamination

Insecticides are universal used in controller of bee sicknesses and pests. In maximum prompt administration and their effect is uncontrolled and functional without accepted protocols [27]. The utilization of insecticide and pesticides to defend crops is used to rise horticulture as well as agricultural efficiency. Though, unrestrained claim can cause the infection of honey bee ecosystem, different animal types, and human [28]. Various contaminants are excluded due to their well published health hazards like oncogenic effect on human health. Several noxious constituents used to regulate varroosis and ascospheriosis like celazole, acaricides amitraz, coumaphos, bromopropylate, taufluvalinate and flumethrin [29]. The use of these elements confidential apiaries transmits risk of straight infection of honey and other accumulate artifact. The maximum residues of pesticides are from varroacides that accumulate in beeswax, pollen, and bee bread and their residue levels increase from honey to pollen to beeswax [30]. The maximum limits of pesticide residues in honey are not included in the Codex Alimentarius. In Indian forest regions, a research was supported to explore the amount of insecticide residue in honey twisted in the several regions of Himachal [31]. It was initiate that pesticides and its derivatives were the maximum detected frequently followed by dichlor-DDT and its isomer [32]. In Turkey, 24 organochlorine pesticide residues in 109 different honey samples collected from stores and open markets in Konya, Turkey, were analyzed by gas chromatography-electron capture detection [1, 32, 33]. However, in another study, a number of 15 organophosphorus insecticides were investigated in 275 honey samples in 33 different cities of Turkey [34]. In east France, a field inspection was introduced in French beehives in order to display the healthiness of honey bee clusters. Honeycomb samples were collected together when a year over. A total number of 125 honey bee colonies were collected in yearend [35]. Deposits of 15 of the investigated composites (17 pesticides and acaricides and 2 fungus species) were create in samples i.e. coumaphos, taufluvalinate, endosulfan and deposited residues were the most commonly occurring residues. Honeycomb infection was the effect of equally in-hive acaricides actions and ecological contamination [36, 37]. In Poland, different fungicides which included vinclozolin, iprodione, methyl thiophanate, captan, and difenoconazole were applied in cherry trees; the residue level of these fungicides were recovered from honey and pollen [38].

Advertisement

4. Health effect of insecticides

Universal overview of insecticides into fluid of nectar and pollen have straight significances for honey bee healthiness and eventually lead to insecticide infection of honey-containing sustenance. The consequence of insecticides on human wellbeing are injurious based on the harmfulness of the biochemical and the measurement magnitude of revelation [39]. Farmers, labours and their relatives have the extreme exposure to agronomic insecticides. Kids are most vulnerable and complex to insecticides due to their micro size and under growth. Significantly, the chemical substances have the capability to bioaccumulate and biomagnified and also bioconcentrate in the body over time [40, 41]. Consequence of revelation to insecticides ranges from insignificant skin impatience to birth imperfections, cancerous tumor initiation, genetic deviations, blood clotting and nerve sicknesses, endocrine interruption, and coma or bereavement. Many insecticides, with chlordane, Aldrin, DDT, endrin, dihedron, heptachlor, mirex, toxaphene and hexachlorobenzene, are painstaking determined organic contaminants [42, 43, 44]. In China, five antibiotics compounds, tetracycline, oxytetracycline, doxycycline, chlortetracycline, and chloramphenicol, were successfully separated and determined in honey samples [45]. The usage of antibiotics in bee box is illegitimate in many EU republics. But, there are no established methods for antibiotics contamination from honey conferring to European Communal guidelines, which means that pure honey encompassing antibiotics deposits are not allowable to be retailed [46]. In Switzerland, a training involving 76 samples showed that 14 samples confined chloramphenicol residues. In United Kingdom, a research designed to evaluate oxytetracycline residue stages in honey after treatment of honeybee colonies with binary procedures of application in fluid sucrose and in pulverized icing honey [47, 48, 49]. Some samples of honey were removed up to 12 weeks later treatment. Microbiological effects are one of the major health problems in human beings. Certain drugs like nitrofurans and nitroimidazoles can cause cancer in human being. Similarly, some drugs can produce reproductive and teratogenic effects at very low doses (Table 1) [58].

Honey contaminantsSourceReferences
Heavy metalsLead, cadmium, mercury[50]
Radioactive isotopesArsenic[51, 52]
Organic pollutantsDDT, aldrin, mirex, toxaphene, industrial chemicals[53, 54]
PesticidesBacteria, fungus, herbicides[55, 56, 57]
Pathogenic bacteria and acaricidesOrganic acids, essential oils[54]
antibioticsTetracyclines, streptomycin, sulfonamides, Chloramphenicol[42]
Chemical repellentsParadichlorobenzene[37, 38, 39]

Table 1.

Different types of ecological contaminants and beekeeping contaminants in honey.

Advertisement

5. Microorganisms with honey

Pollen may be the original source of microbes in the intestines of honeybees. Because of several explanations, maximum microorganisms and other bacterias cannot produce or replicate in honey. Honey has antibacterial activities that avoid the evolution of many microbes [50]. In accumulation, honey has a small liquid movement, avoiding the duplication and the existence of microorganisms. Though, insufficient pathogens have been start in pure honey [53]. Essentially, microorganisms cannot imitate in honey and presence of more facts of vegetative microorganisms might be due to current infection. Recent research showed that numerous microorganisms inoculated into aseptically composed honey [50]. Honey contamination with spores of Clostridium has been documented in many countries. Many spores of Clostridium botulinum type F were detected in different containers of honey products. In Finland, spores of C. botulinum were detected in 8 (7%) of the 114 Finnish and in 12 (16%) of the 76 imported honey samples [55, 56, 57]. Honey consumption was associated with 15% of the reported cases of infant botulism to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [59, 60]. Recently, a scientific committee of the European Union has examined the hazard of C. botulinum in honey.

Advertisement

6. Honey toxic effect

Honey twisted from ornamental medicated flowers of many plants have a key source of honey inebriation and numerous indications like vertigo, sweating, weakness, nausea, hypotension, vomiting, arrhythmia, shock, and coma might be reported [55]. Mostly, many constituents are poisonous to people but are not noxious to bees. Provoked mixed honey produces ethanol which is toxic (Table 2) [56].

SpeciesSourceReferences
Azalea ponticaAlkaloids[33, 34, 35]
Andromeda flowersGrayanotoxins[27, 28]
Kalmia latifoliaSpoon wood[41, 42]
MelicopeternataWharangi bush[50, 51, 52]
Daturaflower[53, 54, 55]

Table 2.

Toxic honey contamination from poisonous nectar of different plant species.

Advertisement

7. Particulate matter in honey

Air pollution due to environmentally persistent chemicals, particulate matter, and other air contaminants are a serious global problem correlated with respiratory diseases and lung cancer [57]. Honey bees and their hives can be used as bioindicators of agrochemical pesticides due to the sensitivity of an individual bee, the resilience of the colony unit, and the number of bee-related testable matrices [61]. Test grouping or sampling bees with their colonies can recognize areas where insecticides may be destructively impacting pollinator healthiness, and also generating toxic effects for human inhabitants. Honeybee based monitoring can also control additional challenging with ecological or human health or blood contamination. It was used for the ecological chemical assessment of the Canadian people [61, 62, 63, 64]. Climate change, specifically variations in temperature and precipitation, threatens to affect many animal species, ranging from humans to honey bees. Compared to solitary insects, honey bees are less vulnerable to temperature variations [65, 66]. They are able to closely regulate temperature in the hive to maintain growing conditions during temperate weather and ensure colony survival during winter.

Advertisement

8. Honey bees virus transmission

Varroa species is the chief ectoparasite of the honey bees (Apis mellifera) of western regions. Both its dependent life process and its application as a path for viral pathogens. It may create chief injury to honey bee associations [62, 67]. The distorted wing disease is the maximum shared virus conveyed by this ectoparasite and the bug is associated to amplified viral frequency and viral masses in pest-ridden associations. In any host pathogen or host parasite relationship, the mode of transmission determines the dynamics and virulence of the pathogen [65, 68, 69]. Concerning vector borne viruses, the intensification in virulence may because of the straight inoculation of the pathogen by the vector producing worldwide contamination of the host. The straight inoculation might consent the pathogen to avoid multitude defense walls and simplify interaction to duplication positions, consequential in developed loads and in the appearance of unfavorable indications [66, 70].

Advertisement

9. High pressure processing of honey

High-pressure processing (HPP) is an emerging, nonthermal (5–20°C) food processing technology that uses elevated hydrostatic pressures (400–600 MPa) for short periods to inactivate spoilage and pathogenic vegetative microorganisms and certain enzymes [71]. Hyperbaric storage (HS) is a pressure-based methodology that uses hydrostatic pressure as a hurdle to slow down/inhibit microbial proliferation in foods, as occurs during refrigeration [72, 73, 74, 75]. Hence, although many studies are conducted on endospore inactivation under high pressure conditions using Bacillus subtilis as a model organism in different types of food matrices. To assess both germinated (vegetative cells and spores that lost thermal resistance) and non-germinated spores (dormant cells) after each processing condition, an aliquot of honey was heated at 80°C for 20 min to inactivate vegetative cells [76, 77, 78].

Advertisement

10. Pollution contaminant bees and honey

Atmospheric elements well recognized as tracers of vehicular traffic i.e. Sb, Sn, Fe, Cu, Mn, biomass burning i.e. Rb, K, Li, Cs, and soil resuspension Si, Ti, Al, Ca, in bees and beehive product i.e. honey, wax, pollen, propolis [79]. Understanding the complexity of environmental and food production systems is crucial in biomonitoring studies. These elements are usually contained in particulate matter released by these different sources and, over the years, have been effectively used to trace the impact of their emissions in different study areas [80]. The biomass burning emissions are one of the largest sources of fine particles in the troposphere.

11. Honey mediated nanoparticles synthesis

Synthesis of nanoparticles can be categorized into topdown or bottom-up approach. Top-down approach involves a process of breaking down of large structures to create small structures. Physical techniques such as lithography, sputtering deposition, laser ablation nanoparticles are focused [81]. Different green synthesis of nanoparticles has resultant products. New expansions in nanobiotechnology emphasis on ecologically sociable, price effective synthesizing procedures [82, 83]. Plant mediated synthesis of nanoparticles is an eco-friendly and harmless approach of fusion of nanoparticles using organic sources. These green synthesis has unlocked a novel epoch of harmless nanobiotechnology. Ordinary honey recognized as the ecosphere’s oldest nutrition source. This is an exceptional nutrition with more dynamism and nourishing effect. It is formed by A. mellifera (royal honey bee) from herbal nectar, exudations, and evacuations. Accepted honey was useful for therapeutic determinations subsequently earliest epochs [80, 81]. Many indication of the usage of honey as a medicine dates back to 2200–1999 BC someplace a Sumerian dose regulated honey as a pain killer and an liniment. These reported research findings comprise dissimilar methods like practice of bacteriological classifications, herbal classifications, and genetic approaches [84, 85]. Microorganisms were utilized to produce numerous nanomaterials including silver, gold, silver oxide, cadmium sulphide and titanium dioxide. Although yeasts were used to synthesis titanium dioxide, cadmium sulphide and silver [5]. Moreover, actinomycetes species like Rhodococcus were utilized to synthesis gold nanomaterials. Current researches revealed the enormous experimental protocols to synthesis with algae, mostly in synthesizing gold, silver, iron oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Au-Co3O4 nanomaterials were synthesized by a virus mediated protocol [14, 17]. Furthermore, bulbs, seed extracts, leaf extracts, latex and root extracts of plants were used to synthesize silver, palladium and gold nanoparticles [79, 80, 81, 82]. Biotechnological organic materials like starch, honey and ascorbic acid were utilized to synthesizing silver, gold, carbon, palladium and platinum nanomaterials (Figure 1 and Table 3).

Figure 1.

Methods of nanoparticle synthesis.

Microbial and bioresourcesTypes of nanoparticlesSize (nm)References
BacteriaAu, Ag, A2O, TiO2, CdS5–40[79]
FungiAg, TiO2, CdS2–20[80]
AlgaeAg, Au, ZnO, Fe2O47–35[81]
M13 VirusAu-Co3O42–5 (nanowires)[86]
Leaf extractsAg, Au10–30[76]
Seed extractsPd, Ag6–12[87]
LatexAg10–20[65]
BulbsAg7.5–9.2[62]
Root extractsAu, Ag20[14, 17]
Starch and Ascorbic acidAu, Ag18.5–24.3[3, 4, 5]
HoneyPd, Pt, C5–34[1, 2]

Table 3.

Various methods of nanoparticles synthesis and their biological sources and special features with honey.

12. Physical and Biological characterization of honey

Natural pure honey is a sticky and gelatinous solution, depending on its water content. It also has the ability to absorb and hold moisture from the environment [3]. The color of liquid honey varies from clear and colorless to dark amber or black.

13. Honey composition with nanoparticles

Pure honey is an unique and strongest nutrition sources since ancient time. It consists of 81–86% carbohydrate (fructose and glucose), 14–18% H2O, 0.1–0.5% proteins, 0.3% ash, and slight numbers of enzymes, vitamins and amino acids, as well as additional ingredients like phenolic antioxidants [83]. Glucose (29.55–32.4%) and fructose (33.57–39.3%) as the significant starches available in honey represents 86–94% of entire sugars and are gladly fascinated in the intestinal tract. Other starch materials contain disaccharides like sucrose, maltose, turanose, isomaltose, melibiose, nigerose, panose, melezitose and maltotriose. Few oligosaccharides are also available [88]. Pure honey contains 5–7% fructooligosaccharides, which assist as probiotic mediators. Natural honey variabilities contain flavonoids content (pinocembrin, apigenin, quercetin, kaempferol, chrysin, hesperetin and galangin), phenolic composites i.e. caffeic, ferulic acids, p-coumaric, ellagic, bioactive compounds like tocopherols, ascorbic acid, catalase (CAT), reduced glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD), as antioxidant. Maltose and Dextrin are formed from elongated carbohydrate chains by the movement of enzyme amylase [79, 80, 81]. Every insignificant ingredients is recognized to have characteristic nutritious or therapeutic activities and the exceptional blend accounts for the diverse and dissimilar applications of pure honey [81].

The morphology and size of silver nanomaterials were dependent on the basis of concentration of honey utilized and the pH of honey product samples, where element size reduced with cumulative pH. Furthermore, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images with EDS exposed an converse correlation among magnitude of the silver nanoparticles (NPs) and honey concentration. The magnitude of the silver nanoparticles was in the range of 11.95–16.06 nm, when 10 g of honey was applied, while the size more reduced to 10.62–1.75 nm range with amplified honey concentration up to 40 g [82]. The sunlight facilitated protocol to synthesize Ag nanomaterials using honey as mutually a stabilization and reducing agent was testified. Proteins in pure honey seemed to be the capping agent which stabilized the nanoparticles while fructose acted as the reducing agent. TEM analysis and X-ray diffraction (XRD) peak analysis showed a high crystalline assembly [14].

Pd nanoparticles with the range of 5–40 nm were synthesized using honey as both reducing and stabilizing agents. Thus, honey coated Pd nanoparticles possess potential applications in different fields including nanobiotechnology, organic catalytic transformation, and sensors. Plant parts synthesized carbon dots (Cdots) revealed advanced constancy with supplementary compensations including high-fluorescent quantum yield, photostability and nontoxicity. Furthermore, these Cdots were used as a beam for the exposure of Fe3+ and were functional for cell imaging and fluorescent staining [89]. Researchers recommend various possible applications of Cdots in bioimaging and biosensing. Their range of synthesized material was 2.2 nm sized Pt nanomaterials at 100°C in fluid honey solvent. Additionally, 4–14 nm dimension Pt nanowires designed with extensive thermal action by self-assembly. Classification and analysis of the consequential nanoparticles by morphological, spectroscopic, and structural difference recommends that honey frolicked an significant role in the reduction of Pt nanomaterials [80]. FT-IR peaks recommended that the protein contents were bound to Pt nanomaterials through the carboxylate groups. These nanomaterials were constant in liquid medium for more than 90 days and exposed catalytic activities for the secretion of anti-pyrilquinoneimine dye from aniline and 4-amino-antipyrine in an aqueous acid medium [81]. Palladium nanomaterials express catalytic effect and can be used in sensor related applications (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Graphical representation of contaminated honey and nanoparticle associated honey with different characterization techniques.

14. Discussion

Pure honey with bees are experimented from the inside portion of the hive. Scavengers are greatest abundant on the external frames of the hive while harbor bees are commonly start on brood frames. Scavengers can also be appraised at the hive entry when they reappearance from foraging voyages [90]. Deposited pollen is tried from the hive edges while pollen deceptions can be used to accumulate new pollen transported to the hive by vigorous scavengers. Bee calm honey, wax and nectar can be characterized from the hive edges as well [91]. These honey products can be analyzed by means of different methods liable on the samples. At the time of scavenging, honey bees are bare to pathogens and contaminants. Here all the test samples can be detected and quantified by different instrumental protocols. Though specific bees are exposed to ecological stressors. The honey bee colonies as a whole is extra strong and can gather poisons components or respond to them without trouble [89]. This permits for long lasting monitoring of the colonies to record and analysis contaminants in a topographical region and also investigate ecotoxicology inclines over time and space. In this discussion, we review proposed uses of honey bees for environmental monitoring, bioactivities of honey products [92, 93, 94, 95]. We also focus on heavy metals, air pollutants, insecticides, health impact of pesticides, honey toxicity and plant pathogen that can be noticed in honey and their hive materials including bees, stored pollen and wax. In humans, contaminants can be linked to respiratory diseases and cancer, among other ailments. Trace metals such as Mercury (Hg), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr) and Lead (Pb) are highly noxious. In humans, heavy metals cause acute and chronic poisoning and are linked to malignancies, particularly of the upper gastrointestinal tract [96, 97]. Foraging bees pick up heavy metals from contaminated water, air particulates, and vegetation which adhere to the hairs on their bodies. After they arrival to their colonies, these toxic metals can be found in deposited pollen, frequently raised to as bee bread, honey, propolis, beeswax and the gum like solid composed from specific plants [86]. In cultivated honey bees, raised heavy metals can harmfully influence plasma making, steering capabilities, and health proportion. The one exemption was Manganese (Mn), which had the maximum concentrations in bees as well as honey. Pure honey samples collected from tribal and residential areas had Pb isotopic ratios that were comparable to the shape seen in other ecological substitutions including oysters and lichens harvested from unpopulated areas on the coastal areas honey [80, 81]. Monitoring heavy metals in the environment on a regular basis could offer insight into the degree and source of pollution with broad implications for protecting human and ecosystem health.

15. Conclusion

Bacteriological and infectious toxins which contain antibiotics, insecticides, herbicides, and heavy metal associated particles have been conveyed in several honey samples worldwide. Consequently, its absorption deprived of significant its basis and protection might carry health hazards [83]. Classification of contaminated honey must be maintained by repeated characterization and analysis that approves its safety and origin. Health regulatory authorities in every developed and underdeveloped nations have to announce secure regulations and rules that govern the pure honey cultivation, proper handling with caring of bees, and investigation to determine its health safety [5]. This studies exposed that the therapeutic effect as well as composite nanoparticles association of honey may be helpful for nanoresearchers, scientists, honey grower, honey industry etc. [14]. This review also give to practitioner with extraordinary indication and suggestions for subsidiary use of honey products in the homeopathic as well as health field. Although many reports suggested the effectiveness of pure honey in remedial determinations and additional trainings are required to cover every pattern of asthma as well as lungs infection disease [17]. Raw honey with tulsi or basil plant that was not subjected for further investigation and without sterilization should not be used in infants. Additionally, honey should not be functional to injuries and cuts without purification to be indisputable that it is harmless. It also exposed for study to uniqueness of any contamination that undoubtedly marks its healing activities [3, 5]. These approvals must be considered when supplementary honey, pollen, bee venom, royal jelly and wax also used as lungs infection remedies, coughs, blood fat level, heartbeat regulator, prevent and repair dead cells, vomiting, leprosy and beauty products.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to honey cultivators and bee keepers for their support during data collection.

Funding

This paper received no funding.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Consent statement

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1. Hansted L, Crocoll C, Bitarafan Z, Andreasen C. Clopyralid applied to winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) contaminates the food products nectar, honey and pollen. Food Control. 2022;140:109124. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109124
  2. 2. Ullah I, Hanif M, Basit A, Khattak MK, Shah ST, Ullah A, et al. Performance of two terms exponential model on the drying kinetics of solar dried tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum L.) treated with and without chemical preservative. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry. 2022;65:447-456. DOI: 10.21608/ejchem.2021.93566.4414
  3. 3. Ajibola A, Chamunorwa JP, Erlwanger KH. Nutraceutical values of natural honey and its contribution to human health and wealth. Nutrition and Metabolism. 2012;9:1-12. DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-61
  4. 4. Abdelfatah S, Naß J, Knorz C, Klauck SM, Küpper JH, Efferth T. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids cause cell cycle and DNA damage repair defects as analyzed by transcriptomics in cytochrome P450 3A4-overexpressing HepG2 clone 9 cells. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 2022;38:325-345. DOI: 10.1007/s10565-021-09599-9
  5. 5. Balasooriya ER, Jayasinghe CD, Jayawardena UA, Ruwanthika RWD, De Silva RM, Udagama PV. Honey mediated green synthesis of nanoparticles: New era of safe nanotechnology. Journal of Nanomaterials. 2017;2017:1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5919836
  6. 6. Sun W, Niu X, Teng H, Ma Y, Ma L, Liu Y. A 133-year record of eutrophication in the Chaihe Reservoir, Southwest China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108469. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108469
  7. 7. Sheng J, Zhou M, Guo Y, Yuan Y, Li X, Zhang WH, et al. Aboveground productivity and community stability tend to keep stable under long-term fencing and nitrogen fertilization on restoration of degraded grassland. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108971. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108971
  8. 8. Jakubowska-Gawlik K, Kolanowski W, Murali AP, Trafialek J. A comparison of food safety conformity between cattle and pig slaughterhouses. Food Control. 2022;140:109143. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109143
  9. 9. Alvarado-Avila LY, Moguel-Ordóñez YB, García-Figueroa C, Ramírez-Ramírez FJ, Arechavaleta-Velasco ME. Presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in honey and the effects of their consumption on humans and honeybees. Review. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2022;13:787-802. DOI: 10.22319/rmcp.v13i3.6004
  10. 10. Lai Y, Zhang J, Song Y, Li W. Analysis of reservoir environment evolution from 2000 to 2020: A case study in the Guanting Reservoir, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108497
  11. 11. Chen P, Xia J, Ma H, Gao F, Dong M, Xing X, et al. Analysis of spatial distribution pattern and its influencing factors of the Tamarix chinensis population on the beach of the muddy coastal zone of Bohai Bay. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109016
  12. 12. Lin H, Jiang P. Analyzing the phased changes of socioeconomic drivers to carbon dioxide and particulate matter emissions in the Yangtze River Delta. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109044. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109044
  13. 13. Tao Q , Gao G, Xi H, Wang F, Cheng X, Ou W, et al. An integrated evaluation framework for multiscale ecological protection and restoration based on multi-scenario trade-offs of ecosystem services: Case study of Nanjing City, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108962. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108962
  14. 14. Al-Waili N, Salom K, Al-Ghamdi A, Ansari MJ. Antibiotic, pesticide, and microbial contaminants of honey: Human health hazards. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012:1-9. DOI: 10.1100/2012/930849
  15. 15. Ding F, Chen L, Sun C, Zhang W, Yue H, Na S. An upgraded groundwater quality evaluation based on Hasse diagram technique and game theory. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109024
  16. 16. Reza MIH, Rafaai NH, Abdullah SA. Application of graph-based indices to map and develop a connectivity importance index for large mammal conservation in a tropical region: A case study in Selangor state, peninsular Malaysia. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109008. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109008
  17. 17. Martinello M, Mutinelli F, Manzinello C, Dainese N, Giuliato I, Gallina A. The honey bee: An active biosampler of environmental pollution and a possible warning biomarker for human health. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(14):6481. DOI: 10.3390/app11146481
  18. 18. Gong J, Jin T, Liu D, Zhu Y, Yan L. Are ecosystem service bundles useful for mountainous landscape function zoning and management? A case study of Bailongjiang watershed in western China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108495
  19. 19. You Q , Fang N, Jian M, Hu Q , Yao B, Liu D, et al. A reliability-resilience-vulnerability framework for measuring the influence of changes in water level fluctuations on lake conditions. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108468. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108468
  20. 20. Li Q , Li W, Wang S, Wang J. Assessing heterogeneity of trade-offs/synergies and values among ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109026
  21. 21. Xiao Y, Li Y, Tang X, Huang H, Wang R. Assessing spatial–temporal evolution and key factors of urban livability in arid zone: The case study of the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108995. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108995
  22. 22. Wei X, Huang Q , Huang S, Leng G, Qu Y, Deng M, et al. Assessing the feedback relationship between vegetation and soil moisture over the Loess Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108493
  23. 23. Sperlea T, Heider D, Hattab G. A theoretical basis for bioindication in complex ecosystems. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109050. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109050
  24. 24. Benocci R, Roman HE, Bisceglie A, Angelini F, Brambilla G, Zambon G. Auto-correlations and long time memory of environment sound: The case of an Urban Park in the city of Milan (Italy). Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108492. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108492
  25. 25. Rendon N, Rodríguez-Buritica S, Sanchez-Giraldo C, Daza JM, Isaza C. Automatic acoustic heterogeneity identification in transformed landscapes from Colombian tropical dry forests. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109017
  26. 26. Zahran AR, Zhang Q , Tango P, Smith EP. A water quality barometer for Chesapeake Bay: Assessing spatial and temporal patterns using long-term monitoring data. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109022
  27. 27. Zhao Z, Li H, Sun Y, Zhan A, Lan W, Woo SP, et al. Bacteria versus fungi for predicting anthropogenic pollution in subtropical coastal sediments: Assembly process and environmental response. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108484. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108484
  28. 28. Seydi ST, Hasanlou M, Chanussot J. Burnt-Net: Wildfire burned area mapping with single post-fire Sentinel-2 data and deep learning morphological neural network. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108999. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108999
  29. 29. Weilhoefer CL, Pan Y. Can diatom motility indices reflect excess fine sediment condition in streams? Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109012
  30. 30. Charles B, Chase MH, Pociask G, Bhattarai R, Matthews JW. Can functional leaf traits be used for monitoring wetland restoration? A comparison between commonly used monitoring metrics and functional leaf traits. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109032. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109032
  31. 31. Hallman C, Olsson O, Tyler T. Changes in south-Swedish vegetation composition over the last 200 years as described by species-specific indicator and trait values and documented by museum and literature records. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108486
  32. 32. Fu B, Zuo P, Liu M, Lan G, He H, Lao Z, et al. Classifying vegetation communities karst wetland synergistic use of image fusion and object-based machine learning algorithm with Jilin-1 and UAV multispectral images. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108989
  33. 33. Jiang B, Xu W, Zhang D, Nie F, Sun Q. Contrasting multiple deterministic interpolation responses to different spatial scale in prediction soil organic carbon: A case study in Mollisols regions. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108472. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108472
  34. 34. Zielińska KM, Kiedrzyński M, Tomczyk PP, Gręda A, Staniaszek-Kik M, Mrowińska Z. Corrigendum to “Multifaceted fine-grain niche modelling: Two mountain plants in one relic location” [Ecol. Indic. 139 (2022) 108941] (Ecological Indicators (2022) 139, (S1470160X22004125, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108941)). Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109048. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109048
  35. 35. Song W, Zhang H, Zhao R, Wu K, Li X, Niu B, et al. Corrigendum to “Study on cultivated land quality evaluation from the perspective of farmland ecosystems” [Ecol. Indicat. 139 (2022) 108959] (Ecological Indicators (2022) 139, (S1470160X22004307, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108959)). Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109000. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109000
  36. 36. Khamlich S, Maaza M. Cr/α-Cr2O3 monodispersed meso-spherical particles for mid-temperature solar absorber application. Energy Procedia. 2015;68:31-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.229
  37. 37. Schlappack T, Rainer M, Weinberger N, Bonn GK. Sulfonated halloysite nanotubes as a novel cation exchange material for solid phase extraction of toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Analytical Methods. 2022;14:2689-2697. DOI: 10.1039/d2ay00614f
  38. 38. Guo Q , Liu X, He Y, Chen Y. Detecting and comparing extinction debts of amphibians in different habitats of southwestern China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109007
  39. 39. Mariño-Cortegoso S, Stanzione M, Andrade MA, Restuccia C, Rodríguez-Bernaldo de Quirós A, Buonocore GG, et al. Development of active films utilizing antioxidant compounds obtained from tomato and lemon by-products for use in food packaging. Food Control. 2022;140:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109128
  40. 40. Cao C, Su F, Song F, Yan H, Pang Q. Distribution and disturbance dynamics of habitats suitable for Suaeda salsa. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108984. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108984
  41. 41. Musters CJM, Wiggers JMR, de Snoo GR. Distribution of ground-dwelling arthropods across landscapes with intensive agriculture in temperate areas. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109042. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109042
  42. 42. Gough CM, Atkins JW, Fahey RT, Curtis PS, Bohrer G, Hardiman BS, et al. Disturbance has variable effects on the structural complexity of a temperate forest landscape. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109004
  43. 43. Li X, Wang W, Zhang H, Wu T, Yang H. Dynamic baselines depending on REDD+ payments: A comparative analysis based on a system dynamics approach. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108983. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108983
  44. 44. Wang Z, Li X, Mao Y, Li L, Wang X, Lin Q. Dynamic simulation of land use change and assessment of carbon storage based on climate change scenarios at the city level: A case study of Bortala, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108499. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108499
  45. 45. Zhang Q , Yuan R, Singh VP, Xu CY, Fan K, Shen Z, et al. Dynamic vulnerability of ecological systems to climate changes across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108483. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108483
  46. 46. María Regueiro-Ferreira R, Alonso-Fernández P. Ecological elasticity, decoupling, and dematerialization: Insights from the EU-15 study (1970-2018). Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109010
  47. 47. Sanchez L, Boulanger E, Arnal V, Boissery P, Dalongeville A, Dejean T, et al. Ecological indicators based on quantitative eDNA metabarcoding: The case of marine reserves. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108966. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108966
  48. 48. Liu Y, Qu Y, Cang Y, Ding X. Ecological security assessment for megacities in the Yangtze River basin: Applying improved emergy-ecological footprint and DEA-SBM model. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108481. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108481
  49. 49. Wang LJ, Gong JW, Ma S, Wu S, Zhang X, Jiang J. Ecosystem service supply–demand and socioecological drivers at different spatial scales in Zhejiang Province, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109058. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109058
  50. 50. Kupka D, Gruba P. Effect of pH on the sorption of dissolved organic carbon derived from six tree species in forest soils. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108975. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108975
  51. 51. Li H, Luo P, Yang H, Li T, Luo C, Wu S, et al. Effect of road corridors on plant diversity in the Qionglai mountain range, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108504
  52. 52. Hu W, Du J, Su S, Tan H, Yang W, Ding L, et al. Effects of climate change in the seas of China: Predicted changes in the distribution of fish species and diversity. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108489. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108489
  53. 53. Wang PY, Hua BZ. Elevational diversity pattern and allochronic divergence of scorpionflies in the Qinling Mountains. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108500. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108500
  54. 54. Williams B, Lamont TAC, Chapuis L, Harding HR, May EB, Prasetya ME, et al. Enhancing automated analysis of marine soundscapes using ecoacoustic indices and machine learning. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108986. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108986
  55. 55. Del Borghi A, Tacchino V, Moreschi L, Matarazzo A, Gallo M, Arellano Vazquez D. Environmental assessment of vegetable crops towards the water-energy-food nexus: A combination of precision agriculture and life cycle assessment. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109015
  56. 56. Hermans SM, Lear G, Buckley TR, Buckley HL. Environmental DNA sampling detects between-habitat variation in soil arthropod communities, but is a poor indicator of fine-scale spatial and seasonal variation. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109040. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109040
  57. 57. Khokhlova A, Gudnitz MN, Ferriol P, Tejada S, Sureda A, Pinya S, et al. Epiphytic foraminifers as indicators of heavy-metal pollution in Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109006
  58. 58. Wu C, Shu C, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Liu Y. Effect of N deposition on the home-field advantage of wood decomposition in a subtropical forest. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109043. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109043
  59. 59. Song C, Sun C, Xu J, Fan F. Establishing coordinated development index of urbanization based on multi-source data: A case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109030. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109030
  60. 60. Zhang Z, Zhou J, Yan Y, Wang X, Chen B, Zhang H, et al. Estimating the impact of climate change on the carbon exchange of a temperate meadow steppe in China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109055. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109055
  61. 61. Yao Y, Chen J, Li F, Sun M, Yang X, Wang G, et al. Exchangeable Ca2+ content and soil aggregate stability control the soil organic carbon content in degraded Horqin grassland. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108507. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108507
  62. 62. Bassi S, Galletti G, Carpana E, Palminteri S, Bosi F, Loglio G, et al. Powdered sugar examination as a tool for the assessment of Paenibacillus larvae infection levels in honey bee colonies. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022;9:853707. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.853707
  63. 63. Gregušková EK, Mihálik D, Kraic J, Mrkvová M, Sokol J, Gregor P, et al. Genotoxic effects of transboundary pollutants in Pinus mugo in the high mountain habitats. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109009
  64. 64. Filippelli G, Anenberg S, Taylor M, van Geen A, Khreis H. New approaches to identifying and reducing the global burden of disease from pollution. GeoHealth. 2020;4(4):e2018GH000167. DOI: 10.1029/2018GH000167
  65. 65. Attaullah M, Nawaz MA, Ilahi I, Ali H, Jan T, Khwaja S, et al. Honey as a bioindicator of environmental organochlorine insecticides contamination. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2023;83:e250373. DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.250373
  66. 66. Cunningham MM, Tran L, McKee CG, Ortega Polo R, Newman T, Lansing L, et al. Honey bees as biomonitors of environmental contaminants, pathogens, and climate change. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108457. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108457
  67. 67. Ricotta C, Bacaro G, Maccherini S, Pavoine S. Functional imbalance not functional evenness is the third component of community structure. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109035. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109035
  68. 68. Salo T, Salovius-Laurén S. Green algae as bioindicators for long-term nutrient pollution along a coastal eutrophication gradient. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109034
  69. 69. Yin Z, Li L, Liu C, Yan W, Wang L, Zhang M, et al. Historical variations of sedimentary organic matter sources and their relationships with human socio-economic activities in multiple habitats of a shallow lake. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109011
  70. 70. Di Noi A, Casini S, Campani T, Cai G, Caliani I. Review on sublethal effects of environmental contaminants in honey bees (Apis mellifera), knowledge gaps and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18:1-22. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041863
  71. 71. Ponce-Vejar G, Ramos de Robles SL, Macias-Macias JO, Petukhova T, Guzman-Novoa E. Detection and concentration of neonicotinoids and other pesticides in honey from honey bee colonies located in regions that differ in agricultural practices: Implications for human and bee health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(13):8199. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138199
  72. 72. Zhao K, Wang L, You Q , Zhang J, Pang W, Wang Q. Impact of cyanobacterial bloom intensity on plankton ecosystem functioning measured by eukaryotic phytoplankton and zooplankton indicators. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109028. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109028
  73. 73. Tian Y, Xu D, Song J, Guo J, You X, Jiang Y. Impacts of land use changes on ecosystem services at different elevations in an ecological function area, northern China. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109003. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109003
  74. 74. Estes-Zumpf W, Addis B, Marsicek B, Lee M, Nelson Z, Murphy M. Improving sustainability of long-term amphibian monitoring: The value of collaboration and community science for indicator species management. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108451. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108451
  75. 75. Wang C, Li X, Xuan K, Jiang Y, Jia R, Ji J, et al. Interpolation of soil properties from geostatistical priors and DCT-based compressed sensing. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109013
  76. 76. de Jongh EJ, Harper SL, Yamamoto SS, Wright CJ, Wilkinson CW, Ghosh S, et al. One Health, One Hive: A scoping review of honey bees, climate change, pollutants, and antimicrobial resistance. PLoS One. 2022;17:1-18. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242393
  77. 77. Ma W, Du Y, Liu X, Shen Y. Literature review: Multi-criteria decision-making method application for sustainable deep-sea mining transport plans. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109049. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109049
  78. 78. Liu H, Liu S, Wang F, Liu Y, Yu L, Wang Q , et al. Management practices should be strengthened in high potential vegetation productivity areas based on vegetation phenology assessment on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108991. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108991
  79. 79. Ghramh HA, Ibrahim EH, Kilany M. Study of anticancer, antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and silver nanoparticles production by Sidr honey from three different sources. Food Science & Nutrition. 2020;8:445-455. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1328
  80. 80. Czernel G, Bloch D, Matwijczuk A, Cieśla J, Kędzierska-matysek M, Florek M, et al. Biodirected synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous honey solutions and evaluation of their antifungal activity against pathogenic Candida spp. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(14):7715. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147715
  81. 81. Shubha P, Namratha K, Chatterjee J, Mustak MS, Byrappa K. Use of honey in stabilization of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized via hydrothermal route and assessment of their antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity. Global Journal of Nanomedicine. 2017;2:37-41. DOI: 10.19080/gjn.2017.02.555585
  82. 82. Liu YJ, Jing Z, Bai XT, Diao QY, Wang J, Wu YY, et al. Nano-La2O3 induces honeybee (Apis mellifera) death and enriches for pathogens in honeybee gut bacterial communities. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:780943. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.780943
  83. 83. Neupane BP, Chaudhary D, Paudel S, Timsina S, Chapagain B, Jamarkattel N, et al. Himalayan honey loaded iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization and study of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2019;14:3533-3541. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S196671
  84. 84. Kostić A, Milinčić DD, Petrović TS, Krnjaja VS, Stanojević SP, Barać MB, et al. Mycotoxins and mycotoxin producing fungi in pollen: Review. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(2):64. DOI: 10.3390/toxins11020064
  85. 85. Liu H, Yan F, Tian H. Towards low-carbon cities: Patch-based multi-objective optimization of land use allocation using an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108455. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108455
  86. 86. Samarghandian S, Farkhondeh T, Samini F. Honey and health: A review of recent clinical research. Pharmacognosy Research. 2017;9:121-127. DOI: 10.4103/0974-8490.204647
  87. 87. Kozlov MV, Zverev V, Zvereva EL. Leaf size is more sensitive than leaf fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of plant stress caused by simulated herbivory. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108970. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108970
  88. 88. Zhang Z, Huang J, Duan S, Huang Y, Cai J, Bian J. Use of interpretable machine learning to identify the factors influencing the nonlinear linkage between land use and river water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:108977. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108977
  89. 89. Moinfar S, Khodayari A, Abdulrahman SS, Aghaei A, Sohrabnezhad S, Jamil LA. Development of a SPE/GC–MS method for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides in food samples using syringe filters packed by GNP/MIL-101 (Cr) nanocomposite. Food Chemistry. 2022;371:130997. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130997
  90. 90. Carroll MJ, Corby-Harris V, Brown N, Snyder L, Reitz DC. Methoxyfenozide has minimal effects on replacement queens but may negatively affect sperm storage. Apidologie. 2022;53:1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-022-00940-7
  91. 91. Hu S, Li H, Chen C, Chen C, Zhao D, Dong B, et al. Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning algorithms to detect adulterated Suichang native honey. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:1-7. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07222-3
  92. 92. Scepankova H, Pinto CA, Estevinho LM, Saraiva JA. High-pressure-based strategies for the inactivation of Bacillus subtilis endospores in honey. Molecules. 2022;27(18):5918. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27185918
  93. 93. Gleńsk M, Dudek MK, Kinkade P, Santos ECS, Glinski VB, Ferreira D, et al. Isolation of echimidine and its C-7 isomers from Echium plantagineum L. and their hepatotoxic effect on rat hepatocytes. Molecules. 2022;27(9):2869. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092869
  94. 94. Raypah ME, Omar AF, Muncan J, Zulkurnain M, Abdul Najib AR. Identification of stingless bee honey adulteration using visible-near infrared spectroscopy combined with Aquaphotomics. Molecules. 2022;27(7):2324. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072324
  95. 95. Salehnia N, Ahn J. Modelling and reconstructing tree ring growth index with climate variables through artificial intelligence and statistical methods. Ecological Indicators. 2022;134:108496. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108496
  96. 96. Li C, Han H, Ablimiti M, Liu R, Zhang H, Fan J. Morphological and physiological responses of desert plants to drought stress in a man-made landscape of the Taklimakan desert shelter belt. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109037. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109037
  97. 97. Korner-Nievergelt F, Strebel N, Buckland ST, Freeman R, Gregory RD, Guélat J, et al. Multi-species population indices for sets of species including rare, disappearing or newly occurring species. Ecological Indicators. 2022;140:109005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109005

Written By

Biswajit Patra and Surya Narayan Pradhan

Submitted: 20 November 2022 Reviewed: 20 December 2022 Published: 28 February 2023