Chemical composition of different by-products from agro-industrial processing.
Abstract
Intensive livestock farming systems are vital for sustaining the growing world population by providing several goods and services. However, the increased livestock operations cost, particularly related to animal feeding, compromises the expansion of this industry, especially in developing countries. One way to reduce the feeding costs without compromising the nutritional quality would be the use of protein-rich food waste discarded by the industries that otherwise would pollute the environment. This chapter presents an overview of the intensive livestock farming systems in developed and developing countries and discusses the use of agro-industrial by-products as alternative sources of nutrients to improve livestock productivity, as well as the key nutritional components that are likely involved to improve the reproductive performance of animals. Our results showed that diets containing 30 to 45% of coconut meal, rich in ether extract and protein, may improve sperm progressive motility, sperm concentration per mL, total sperm per ejaculate, and total viable sperm per ejaculate of beef goats, compared with diets with no or lower coconut meal content. Diets with coconut meals may also enhance the semen quality of sheep.
Keywords
- goats
- lipid and protein resources
- semen quality
- sheep
- testicular parameters
1. Introduction
Livestock farming is a vital component of agriculture with the potential to promote the economic growth of both developing and developed countries, more so in developing countries. Livestock sustains the world population by providing various services and goods such as meat, milk, eggs, skin, and by-products [1].
Intensive farming refers to a method of food production that relies on intensification techniques. This farming system involves management practices and operations such as concentrated animal feeding, a large number of livestock raised in confinement at high stocking density, and use of selectively bred animals that grow more quickly than naturally occurring breeds and get large enough for slaughter in a shorter period [2]. The intensive livestock farming industry provides employment opportunities for millions of rural households, thereby helping reduce poverty in rural areas, especially in developing countries [2, 3].
By 2050, global livestock production is expected to double-growing faster than any other agricultural subsector, with most of this increase taking place in developing countries [4]. The expansion of the livestock industry may help meet the increasing demand for livestock products, especially in developing countries, which is adding additional pressure on the worldwide livestock farming systems [3]. However, the overall viability of the industrial livestock farming systems depends largely on animal performance and production efficiency, which are negatively affected by the scarcity and fluctuation in the quality and quantity of the animal feed supply. At a certain period of the year, the quality of grazing and browse deteriorates due to seasonal influences, resulting in a decline in animal productivity, unless supplements are provided for the animals [5]. Nonetheless, the conventional feeds commonly used to supplement ruminants are either not available or are available at a high cost, which means that strategies to make livestock farming more efficient to respond to the increasing demand for beef, milk, eggs, and other products are needed. One way to reduce the feeding costs without compromising the nutritional quality would be to use nonconventional feed resources such as by-products from agro-industrial processing and vegetable wastes that are locally available [6]. Many by-products used as alternative feeds are rich in fatty acids such as lauric, myristic, and linoleic, which may enhance productive animal performance [7].
During the dry season in tropical countries, especially in Africa, when only mature senescent material is available, both intake and digestibility are low. As a result, available nutrients do not meet the requirements of the animal, which compromise the animal’s ability to reach its genetic potential, unless the nutrient status is increased through supplementation using concentrates that supply primary nutrients such as protein, carbohydrate, and fat [8]. Thus, a better understanding of the quality of by-products and their use in animal feed may probably make livestock farming more efficient, especially in developing countries [9].
This chapter presents an overview of the intensive livestock farming systems in developed and developing countries and discusses the use of agro-industrial by-products as alternative sources of nutrients to improve livestock productivity, as well as the key nutritional components that are likely involved to improve the reproductive efficiency of animals.
2. Global overview of intensive livestock farming systems
Livestock farming throughout the world is becoming increasingly intensive as a result of the increased demand for beef, milk, eggs, and dairy by-products. The estimated population whose livelihood depends on agriculture makes up 42% of the total world population [10]. Therefore, this sector plays a vital role in the process of economic development of any country by ensuring a flow of essential food products, which contribute to food security. Also, livestock farming contributes draught energy and manure for crop production and appears to be the key food and cash security available to many people living in developing countries [4, 11].
It has been reported that the world’s population is expected to increase by 2% annually reaching 9.1 billion by 2050, while food demand is projected to increase by 59% in the coming decades. These projections challenge farmers to use proper methods, systems, and technologies to maximize productivity so that they can respond effectively to human consumption needs [12]. Since a majority of rural households live in areas where poverty and deprivation are the most severe and depend on agriculture for their survival, it might seem obvious that livestock needs to be intensive, modern, efficient, and competitive so that its contribution can reduce poverty and transform the economies of the countries [13]. Therefore, efficient and sustainable livestock farming systems in the whole world seem to be a priority for both small and large farmers [14].
Livestock farming worldwide is practiced in three different systems: extensive, semi-intensive, and intensive systems. In extensive livestock farming, mostly practiced in developing countries, the land is individually owned and the animals are heavily dependent on vegetation composed of wild plant species for grazing, which compromises the faster growth of animals and reduces their productive performance [12]. In this system, the animals are only brought indoors and fed meals during lambing and calving seasons or the winter. Although it is a less efficient system, it presents some advantages in terms of sustainability as it returns most of the animal manure directly to the soil, thereby contributing to increased crop production and nutrient cycling [11]. Also, animals can be raised in the semi-intensive systems, where they graze for some period during the day and in the evening, they feed on supplements. Both extensive and semi-intensive systems are practiced by smallholder farmers, and they are more suitable for ruminants such as cattle, goats, and sheep [15].
Currently, in the whole world, more so in developed countries, farmers are practicing intensive system-based management so that they can provide beef, milk, and eggs throughout the year. In this system, also described as factory farming, animals are enclosed in zero-grazing units where are fed and provided water to yield high productivity (beef, dairy produce, and poultry) from limited land available by raising large numbers of animals indoors. Under this system, diet, breeding, and disease are managed precisely and in consequence, meat, milk, and other products are produced in large quantities [16]. However, confined animals are usually fed based on concentrates composed of very expensive feedstuffs which makes this system the most expensive, requiring high initial costs to develop the activity [17]. One of the key strategies to make intensive livestock farming cheaper would be the adoption of food alternatives based on locally available and low-cost by-products such as coconut meal, palm kernel cake (PKC), palm fiber, cottonseed meal, and other vegetable and fruit wastes [18].
3. Alternative animal feeding for intensive livestock farming
One of the major constraints to livestock farming is the scarcity and fluctuation of the quantity and quality of the feed supply. However, it has been estimated that about one-third of the food produced globally for human consumption is wasted, representing a significant loss of the resources spent making and processing food and a threat to food security. The reduction of food waste is, therefore, a potential strategy for closing the gap between the supply and demand for food [19]. Moreover, competition between humans and animals for grains such as corn, wheat, bean, soybean, and others is increasing. Thus, it has become imperative to consider the use of food waste rich in protein, lipids, and some essential nutrients for animal health as feedstock in the animal feed industry [20].
Food waste is also referred to as a nonconventional feed resource, which is defined as feeds that have not been traditionally used in animal feeding and/or are not normally used in commercially produced rations for livestock. Some of such nonconventional feeds are agro-industrial by-products, which contain little economical value as foods for human consumption. In recent years, agro-industrial by-products have become major sources of dietary nutrients and energy in support of beef and milk production because they are available for use as livestock feeds at competitive prices relative to other commodities [21, 22]. Thus, the use of food waste for livestock feeding can help farmers reduce feed costs and help food waste generators reduce disposal costs while minimizing the environmental impacts of this waste [20].
In developing countries, the productivity of ruminant livestock has been constrained by the low quality of feed supply, since the basal diet of most cattle, sheep, and goats almost totally consists of roughage. Farmers often use high amounts of cereal grain-based concentrates for meat and milk production; however, this practice has introduced competition since grain is used for human consumption [23, 24]. Thus, providing adequate good quality feed to livestock to raise and maintain their productivity may be a major challenge to farmers all over the world. Future hopes of feeding millions of people worldwide and safeguarding their food security will directly depend on a high level of productivity, animal performance, and efficiency of the livestock farming, which may be reached through intensive animal farming that includes supplementary feeding plans based on by-products feeds [1].
In some developing countries in Africa, the farmers can neither spare land for feed production nor can they afford to buy expensive concentrates to feed animals. Therefore, efficient utilization of nonconventional feed for ruminants is a priority. For goats and sheep, supplementary feeding could be performed using crop residues, hay or silage for energy, protein concentrates, and agro-industrial by-products for additional protein [18]. So, it is important to support farmers with knowledge and technologies related to alternative feed resources that are easy to adopt and economically viable. To that end, studies were performed in Brazil to assess the nutritional composition of coconut meals and their impact on the reproductive performance of goats under the grazing system, and the results are discussed in the next section.
3.1 Nutritional composition of by-products used as alternative feeding for ruminants
The limited supply of nutritious feed is one of the main limiting factors to efficient animal production and reproduction. An intensive feeding system based on locally available by-product feeds may be an alternative promising feeding system to rear ruminants economically. However, the chemical composition of agro-industrial by-products may vary largely depending on the feedstock type (Table 1).
Agro-industrial by-products | Nutritional compositionz (%) | Reference | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM | Ash | CP | EE | ADF | CF | NDF | ||
Palm fiber | 97.60 | 7.50 | 7.40 | 7.70 | 40.0 | 37.50 | 66.80 | Padilla et al. [25] |
91.00 | 5.30 | ND | 2.69 | 54.80 | ND | 76.80 | Obese et al. [26] | |
95.30 | 5.30 | 15.12 | 3.98 | 25.30 | ND | 46.30 | Chanjula et al. [27] | |
Chickpea | 89.60 | 6.80 | 6.50 | 1.20 | 51.60 | 39.00 | 69.40 | Bampidis et al. [28] |
89.30 | 3.30 | 21.90 | 4.00 | 4.80 | ND | 27.70 | Serrapica et al. [29] | |
91.10 | 2.85 | 22.50 | 5.09 | ND | 1.64 | ND | Majewska et al. [30] | |
Soybean meal | 93.85 | 5.70 | 44.56 | 5.69 | 7.35 | 5.60 | 13.84 | NRC [31] |
88.87 | 6.39 | 51.41 | 3.45 | 10.13 | 6.18 | 12.22 | Zambom et al. [32] | |
87.9 | 7.21 | 54.30 | 1.32 | 7.00 | ND | 9.10 | Harper et al. [33] | |
Orange pulp | 22.10 | ND | 15.10 | 19.10 | 17.20 | 7.70 | 26.50 | Minguez et al. [34] |
90.00 | 6.00 | 11.00 | 12.00 | 14.00 | 7.86 | 41.00 | Watanabe [35] | |
Rapeseed meal | 93.11 | 6.39 | 35.19 | 9.97 | 17.57 | 9.77 | 23.77 | NRC [31] |
88.0 | 7.30 | 38.60 | 1.40 | 16.80 | 11.80 | 20.70 | Feng and Zuo [36] | |
88.70 | ND | 33.70 | 2.30 | 19.60 | 12.40 | 28.30 | Maison [37] | |
Palm kernel cake | 95.8 | 3.06 | 10.05 | 8.21 | 13.48 | 19.30 | 71.37 | Mugabe et al. [38]; Suhaimi et al. [39] |
91.87 | 3.53 | 13.97 | 10.78 | 56.02 | ND | 64.09 | Bringel et al. [40] | |
95.29 | 3.33 | 16.64 | 7.78 | 45.71 | ND | 70.04 | Oliveira et al. [41] | |
Cottonseed meal | 90.69 | 6.39 | 39.22 | 5.50 | 17.92 | 13.96 | 25.15 | NRC [31] |
94.50 | 7.51 | 24.28 | 7.94 | 31.80 | ND | 43.56 | Tavares-Samay et al. [42] | |
92.00 | 5.00 | 23.00 | 17.50 | 20.00 | 20.80 | 40.00 | Blasi and Drouillard [43] | |
Apple pomace | 92.35 | ND | 6.62 | 5.53 | 20.78 | 14.48 | 39.03 | Xiong et al. [44] |
95.20 | 2.30 | 9.02 | 3.70 | 46.70 | ND | 61.20 | Mirzaei-Aghsaghali et al. [45] | |
88.84 | 6.10 | 7.70 | 6.18 | 43.20 | 51.10 | 68.50 | Beigh et al. [46] | |
Coffee pulp | 94.30 | 5.80 | 12.90 | 2.40 | ND | 14.60 | 37.20 | Padilla et al. [25] |
69.16 | 16.6 | 18.12 | 5.71 | ND | 33.63 | ND | Daniel et al. [47] | |
88.69 | 8.42 | 12.58 | 2.65 | 77.84 | ND | 54.39 | Barcelos et al. [48] |
Some nonconventional feeds such as coconut meal contain a crude protein ranging from 20 to 25% dry matter (DM) with relatively high quantities of cell wall constituents [neutral detergent fiber (NDF) more than 50% DM, and acid detergent fiber (ADF) of about 30% DM] [49]. Coconut meal obtained from mechanical extraction has generally high oil content (about 5 to 15% DM). This quantity of oil content makes it a valuable energy source for ruminants. An increase in the energy content of the diets through supplementary concentrate can potentially enhance milk production and improve growth rate, body weight gain, and reproductive performance [50, 51].
There are further feedstuffs also valuable as an alternative feed for ruminants, such as palm fiber, chickpea, orange pulp, rapeseed meal, cottonseed meal, and palm kernel cake (PKC), which because of its nutritional content may be described as an energy food. In addition, palm kernel cake supplies protein and energy but is usually classified as a source of protein, which may vary from 10.1 to 16.6% (Table 1). This protein content of PKC is regarded as sufficient to meet the needs of most ruminants [52, 53]. Proteins are the principal constituents of the organs and muscles and are required by ruminants for metabolic functions [38, 54]. Palm kernel cake also contains a large amount of crude fiber (CF; 19.3%), dry matter ranging from 91.9 to 95.8%, ether extract (EE; 7.8 to 10.8%), ash (3.1 to 3.5%), neutral detergent fiber (NDF; 64.1 to 71.4%), acid detergent fiber (13.5 to 56.0%) (Table 1), nitrogen-free extract (NFE; 46.7 to 58.8%), total carbohydrates (78.7%), nonfibrous carbohydrates (NFCs) (7.31%), hemicellulose (HEM) (25.98%), and lignin (4.28%) [38, 55]. The metabolizable energy (ME) of palm kernel cake for ruminants is 2.5 to 2.6 Mcal kg−1, which is considered suitable for most ruminants [55].
Animals must be fed diets containing the earlier-mentioned essential nutrients for healthy growth and increased production. The ether extract is the main source of lipids which constitutes the principal component of sperm cells. It also stimulates cholesterol biosynthesis and testosterone secretion to sustain semen production in males [56]. Other fibrous components are sources of carbohydrates which are converted to acetic acids and used by the cows for energy and precursor of fat in milk [57]. It is also essential for animal health, since it is required by ruminants to support an appropriate rumen function and physiology [58].
3.2 Dietary effects on reproductive performance of ruminant livestock
The process of reproduction is aligned closely with the food supply. It is a coordinated function of many tissues, cell types, and regulatory systems which is possible only when animals are provided with sufficient quantities of dietary nutrients [59]. In tropical regions such as Africa, ruminants raised on smallholder farms face constraints of improper nutritional management, which may negatively affect their growth, health, and reproductive performance [60, 61]. For instance, puberty is usually delayed in grazing ruminants because grasslands in semiarid zones in the tropics do not provide enough protein and other nutrients, which leads to insufficient production of rumen microbial protein to support optimum growth rate [60]. Thus, nutrition plays a pivotal role in maintaining the body condition and reproductive efficiency of animals.
Nutrition consists of different nutrients such as protein, fat, carbohydrates, and micro-elements. Carbohydrates and proteins provide substrates for rumen fermentation, which results in the production of volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Ruminants utilize these VFAs as their main source of energy for maintenance, milk production, and reproductive performance. Malnutrition resulting from inadequate, excess, or imbalanced nutrient intake may lead to the loss of body weight. Low body condition delays the onset of puberty (up to 1 year in sheep and goats), reduces ovulation and lower conception rates, compromises embryonic and fetal survival, increases the postpartum interval to conception, interferes with normal ovarian cyclicity by decreasing gonadotropin secretion, increases the chances of infertility, and influences the rate of genetic progress [62, 63]. So, it seems to be clear that the initial reproductive events are sensitive to fluctuations in nutrient availability [61].
An inverse relationship between growth rate and age at puberty also exists in males. Low-quality feeding has been shown to delay puberty by about 5 months in bulls. The animals had poor testicular development and smaller ejaculates as compared to their normal counterparts. On the other hand, bulls kept on grazing plus concentrate feed showed a better growth rate than those on grazing only, with an earlier age at puberty and a greater scrotal circumference [60]. Even at maturity, the size of the testicles of underfed animals can be smaller [59] resulting in a lower sperm concentration in the semen. It has also been reported that the seminal vesicles contain less fructose and citric acid as well as smaller Leydig cells and seminiferous tubules and decreased testosterone levels under protein stress conditions [64]. Restriction of both protein and energy also prevented Merino lambs from reaching puberty in their first potential breeding season, with reduced testicular size and sperm quality in the ejaculate. Feed restriction also reduces libido in rams [60].
3.2.1 Effect of coconut meal on goat reproductive performance
To assess the effectiveness of coconut meal as an alternative feed and its effect on beef goats’ reproductive performance, a study was conducted in Brazil in 2016. Forty-eight males with initial body weight ranging from 26.04 to 28.54 kg were assigned in a completely randomized design into four groups with 12 replicates each under a semi-intensive system. The animals were kept indoors during the night and moved to graze in the morning on a pasture composed of
Ingredients | Level of coconut meal (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | |
g kg−1 as fed | ||||
Coconut meal | 0 | 150 | 300 | 450 |
Soybean meal | 350 | 320 | 290 | 250 |
Cornmeal | 600 | 450 | 350 | 250 |
Mineral salt | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Urea | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Nutrients | Ingredients | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Coconut meal | Soybean bagasse | Corn meal | ||
% | ||||
Dry matter | 90.45 | 87.71 | 86.45 | 41.60 |
Ash | 3.76 | 7.05 | 3.76 | 6.31 |
Ether extract | 13.79 | 3.11 | 4.95 | 2.38 |
Neutral detergent fiber | 58.46 | 57.60 | 30.69 | 52.01 |
Crude protein | 23.57 | 46.38 | 6.74 | 7.48 |
Total carbohydrates | 4.89 | 42.95 | 86.40 | 76.13 |
Hemicellulose | 24.95 | 49.31 | 28.71 | 18.55 |
Lignin | 16.21 | 2.96 | 1.47 | 3.09 |
Our results showed an increase in the scrotal circumference and testicular volume of goats fed with concentrates containing 30% and 45% of coconut meal (Table 4). This result suggests that concentrates with high amounts of coconut meal may be more effective than those with lower amounts in improving goat’s testis. Also, the data in Table 4 suggest that scrotal circumference and testicular volume may increase as the body weight of goat increases, indicating a positive relationship between nutrition and goats’ testis size or reproductive efficiency. Males with a larger testis tend to produce more semen and offspring that reach puberty at an earlier age and release more ovules during each estrous period [68]. Oldham et al. [69] found that a 25% increase in testicular size led to an 81% increase in the production of spermatozoa. Also, Cameron et al. [70] found that an 86% increase in testicular size led to a 250% increase in the production of spermatozoa. The positive relation between testicular biometric parameters and body weight concerning nutrition effects was also reported by Martinez et al. [71].
Parameters | Levels of coconut meal (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | |
Initial body weight (kg) | 27.38 ± 0.49 | 26.04 ± 57 | 27.50 ± 1.20 | 28.54 ± 2.41 |
Final body weight (kg) | 35.10 ± 2.4b | 37.01 ± 1.1b | 45.02 ± 1.3a | 47.08 ± 2.6a |
DM intakeZ | 113.49 ± 4b | 127.03 ± 4b | 159.10 ± 3a | 157.39 ± 8a |
Body score | 3.20 ± 0.45 | 3.15 ± 0.20 | 3.70 ± 0.95 | 3.85 ± 0.65 |
Scrotal circumferenceY (cm) | 25.29 ± 2.8b | 24.33 ± 3.9b | 36.40 ± 1.7a | 38.05 ± 1.2a |
Length of right testis (cm) | 7.43 ± 1.39 | 7.81 ± 1.80 | 8.40 ± 1.53 | 8.11 ± 1.04 |
Width of right testis (cm) | 4.89 ± 0.33 | 4.68 ± 0.81 | 5.20 ± 0.92 | 5.48 ± 0.99 |
Length of left testis (cm) | 7.11 ± 1.43 | 7.90 ± 1.56 | 8.31 ± 1.00 | 8.05 ± 1.29 |
Width of left testis (cm) | 4.19 ± 0.02 | 4.50 ± 0.63 | 5.10 ± 0.7 | 5.30 ± 0.42 |
Testicular volumeX (cm) | 223 ± 109b | 249 ± 128b | 310 ± 104a | 342 ± 101a |
Testis shapeV | 0.55 ± 0.0 | 0.58 ± 0.0 | 0.60 ± 0.0 | 0.59±0.0 |
The diets with 30% and 45% of coconut meal showed higher levels of ether extract (Table 5) which is a saturated fatty acids source, such as lauric (C12:0), myristic (C14:0), palmitic (C16:0), and stearic (C18:0) acids and unsaturated fatty acids such as myristoleic (C14:1), palmitoleic (16,1), oleic (C18:1), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) that include linoleic (C18:2) and linolenic (C18:3) acids, compared with other diets. So, it may be possible that the fatty acids in coconut meal may have increased the concentration of serum cholesterol which may lead to improved testosterone levels in goats. However, changing nutrition in small ruminants alters not only the total mass of testicular tissue but also the efficiency with which the spermatozoa are produced by that tissue [77].
NutrientsZ | Levels of coconut meal (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | |
g kg−1 | ||||
Dry matter | 710.38 | 718.40 | 739.02 | 741.38 |
Ether extract | 42.50 | 43.28 | 51.39 | 56.19 |
Mineral matter | 34.20 | 36.47 | 37.18 | 37.04 |
Crude protein | 212.40 | 195.03 | 200.41 | 190.47 |
Neutral detergent fiber | 240.60 | 320.31 | 345.02 | 380.58 |
Non-fiber carbohydrates | 482.49 | 436.07 | 395.72 | 329.36 |
Total digestible nutrients | 825.40 | 810.42 | 790.05 | 722.48 |
Cellulose | 22.39 | 26.10 | 68.55 | 94.05 |
Hemicellulose | 320.31 | 354.04 | 349.58 | 337.04 |
Lignin | 52.30 | 67.54 | 86.22 | 92.30 |
It has been classically admitted that in both the mid and the long terms, variations in growth, testicle parameters, and fluctuations in live weight as a result of nutritional status affect also semen quality of ruminants, as nutrition appears to be the major modulator of sexual efficiency in small ruminants [71]. In our previous study with sheep managed under extensive range grazing conditions and fed with palm kernel cake as an alternative fatty acids source, it was observed that the diets affected sperm concentration of animals, more so diets containing 45% of palm kernel cake (Figure 1). Our results suggested positive relation between sperm concentration and nutrition, which means that animal feed supplementation is a key strategy to raise the reproductive performance of ruminants, as larger scrotal circumference, greater ejaculate volume, higher sperm concentration, higher daily sperm production as well as better seminal quality are strongly associated with nutritional management [38].
In the current study, diets containing 30% and 45% of coconut meal improved sperm concentration per mL, total sperm number per ejaculate as well as sperm progressive motility when compared to the non-supplemented group (Table 6). Our results agreed with those of Santos et al. [78] who found that palm kernel cake and coconut meal affected positively the sperm concentration. Moreover, Rege et al. [79] found a strong influence of diets containing fatty acids source on sperm concentration. Depending on the age, genetics, and nutritional status, sperm concentration may vary from 1 to 3 × 109 spermatozoa mL−1 [80]. These results are similar to those observed in our study in which the sperm concentration ranged from 1.45 × 109 to 3.55 × 109 spermatozoa mL−1.
Seminal parameters | Level of coconut meal (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | |
Volume (mL) | 1.92 ± 0.45 | 1.87 ± 0.59 | 1.90 ± 0.3 | 1.96 ± 0.36 |
Mass motility (0–5) | 3.00 ± 2.0 | 3.50 ± 1.0 | 3.00 ± 1.35 | 3.00 ± 1.00 |
Progressive motility (%) | 60.4 ± 3.0b | 65.0 ± 4.0b | 80.5 ± 2.0a | 85.0 ± 0.0a |
Spermatic vigor (0–5) | 3.00 ± 2.0 | 3.00 ± 1.00 | 3.00 ± 2.00 | 3.00 ± 0.00 |
Concentration (×109 mL−1) | 1.45 ± 1.0b | 1.75 ± 1.82b | 3.91 ± 2.47a | 3.55 ± 1.90a |
Total sperm/ejac. (×109)z | 1.39 ± 1.0b | 1.55 ± 1.93b | 2.90 ± 1.44a | 2.87 ± 1.47a |
Viable spermat./ejac. (109)z | 1.15 ± 0.5b | 1.20 ± 0.08b | 1.83 ± 0.37a | 1.95 ± 0.21a |
It has become apparent that reproductive efficiency depends on an adequate nutritional plan. However, other physical parameters of the semen of goats such as semen volume, mass motility, and spermatic vigor did not vary significantly with diets. Nonetheless, the findings from other researchers [81, 82] showed greater semen volume from lambs supplemented with a concentrate containing wheat bran, crushed maize, soybean meal, fish meal, salt, and vitamin-mineral premix than the control. These opposed results may possibly be related to the differences in the crude protein content of the concentrates used in the studies.
4. Conclusion
Intensive livestock farming may be a great strategy to ensure global food security and meet the increased global demand for meat, eggs, and dairy products. However, high operations cost, particularly related to animal feeding, compromises the expansion of this vital industry, especially in developing countries. The use of agro-industrial by-products may help reduce feeding costs without compromising the nutritional quality while reducing the risk of environmental pollution. However, by-products feeds vary largely in nutritional composition, with some containing high levels of crude protein, ether extract, and carbohydrates which have a significant influence on the growth and reproductive performance of ruminants. Diets containing 30 to 45% of coconut meal, rich in lipids and protein, may improve sperm progressive motility, sperm concentration per mL, total sperm per ejaculate, and total viable sperm per ejaculate of beef goats, compared with diets with no or lower coconut meal content. Diets with coconut meals may also enhance the semen quality of sheep. Thus, the use of coconut meal for animal feeding can make intensive farming systems more efficient by improving animal production and reducing feeding costs.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Research Fund (Fundo Nacional de Investigação - FNI), and the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Higher Education of Mozambique through the Scientific Initiation Scholarships.
References
- 1.
Makkar H. Animal Production and Health Division; 2005 - 2.
Upton M. The role of livestock in economic development and poverty reduction. Research Gate; 2004 - 3.
Herrero M, Thornton PK. Livestock and global change: Emerging issues for sustainable food systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110 :20878-20881 - 4.
Ilea R. Intensive livestock farming: Global trends, increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. Journal of Agriculture and Environment Ethics. 2009; 22 :153-167 - 5.
Makkar HPS. Improving Animal Production by Supplementary Feeding of Multinutrient Blocks, Controlling Internal Parasites and Enhancing Utilization of Alternate Feed Resources. Vienna, Austria: IAEI; 2006 - 6.
Moyo SB, Swanepoel FJC. Multifunctionality of Livestock in Developing Communities. In: Swanepoel F, Stroebel A, Moyo S, editors. The role of livestock in developing communities: Enhancing multifunctionality. University of the Free State and Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Cape Town, South Africa. 2010. pp. 1-12 - 7.
Gowe C. Review on potential use of fruit and vegetables by-products as a valuable source of natural food additives. Food Science and Quality Management. 2015; 45 :47-61 - 8.
Smith OB, Somade B. Nutrition reproduction interactions in farm animals. In: Paper presented at the International Foundation seminar on Animal Reproduction. Niamey Niger; 1994 - 9.
Potts GR. Application of research results on by-product utilization: Economic aspects to be considered. In: Proceedings of a Workshop on Applied Research held in Nairobi, Kenya. 1982 - 10.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). The Future of Food and Agriculture – Trends and Challenges. Rome: FAO; 2017 - 11.
Jahnke HE. Livestock Production System and Livestock Development in Tropical Africa. Kiel: KWV; 1982 - 12.
Moekti GR. Industrial livestock production: A review on advantages and disadvantages. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science. 2020:492 - 13.
Diao X, Hazell P, Trurlow J. The Role of Agriculture in African Development. World Development. 2010; 38 :1375-1383 - 14.
Pawlak K, Kolodziejczak M. The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sustainability. 2020; 12 :5488. DOI: 10.3390/su12135488 - 15.
Mubiru R, Namirimu T, Owino S, Kyalingonza L, Nyadoi P, Buyinza J. From Extensive to Semi-intensive Livestock Production Systems in Ugand’s Albertine Rift: Practical Interventions Manual. Uganda Wildlife Society and Buliisa Distrit Local Government, Uganda; 2013 - 16.
Kasapidou E, Basdagianni Z, Papadopoulos V, Karaiskou C, Kesidis A, Tsiotsias A. Effects of intensive and semi-intensive production on sheep milk chemical composition, physicochemical characteristics, fatty acid profile, and nutritional indices. Animals. 2021; 11 :2578 - 17.
Manousidis T, Abas Z, Ragkos A, Abraham EM, Parissi ZM, Kyriazopoulos AP. Effects of the economic crisis on sheep farming system: A case study from the north Evros region, Greece. In: Acar Z, López-Francos A, Porqueddu C, editors. New Approaches for Grassland Research in Context of Climate and Socio-economic Changes. Zaragoza: CIHEAM; 2012. pp. 439-442 - 18.
Degang Z, Xiaopeng PXL, Xiaojing L. Evaluation of tree forages as non-conventional feeds in gansu province of China; 2006. - 19.
FAO. Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2011 - 20.
Rivin J, Miller Z, Matel O. Using Food Waste as Livestock Feed. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, USA; 2014 - 21.
Devendra C. Non-conventional Feed Resources in Asia and Pacific. 2nd ed. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, APHCA, Bangkok; 1985 - 22.
Mirzaei-Aghsaghali A, Maheri-Sis N. Nutritive value of some agro-industrial by-products for ruminants – a review. World Journal of Zoology. 2008; 3 :40-46 - 23.
Yang K, Qing Y, Yu Q, Tang X, Chen G, Fang R, et al. By-products feeds: Current understanding and future perspectives. Agriculture. 2021; 11 :207 - 24.
Akbar MA, Ahmed TU, Mondal MMH. Improving animal productivity and reproductive efficiency: Development and testing medicated urea-molasses multi-nutrient blocks in rural farms of Bangladesh; 2006. - 25.
Padilla DJG, La Plata RD, Curi LMF, Mendiola AEL, Alcarraz RER, Lozano VH, et al. Characterization of the nutritional value of agro-industrial by-products for cattle feeding in the San Martin region. Science and Agriculture. 2020; 21 :1374 - 26.
Obese FY, Osafo ELK, Okai DB. Evaluation of the feeding value of palm press fibre using in vitro digestibility techniques. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2001; 33 :165-172 - 27.
Chanjula P, Petcharat V, Cherdthong A. Rumen characteristics and feed utilization in goats fed with biologically treated oil palm fronds as roughage in a total mixed ration. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2018; 48 :1049-1056 - 28.
Bampidis VA, Christodoulou V. Chickpeas ( Cicer arietinum L .) in animal nutrition: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2011;168 :1-20 - 29.
Serrapica F, Masucci F, Romano R, Napolitano F, Sabia E, Aiello A, et al. Effects of chickpea in substitution of soybean meal on milk production, blood profile and reproductive response of primiparous buffaloes in early lactation. Animals. 2020; 10 :515 - 30.
Majewska AD, Kwiecien M, Mieczan AW, Haliniarz M, Bielak A. Raw chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) as a substitute of soybean meal in compound feed for bloiler chickens: Effects on growth performance, lipid metabolism, fatty acid profile, antioxidant status, and dietary value of muscles. Animals. 2021;11 :3367 - 31.
National Research Council (NRC). Critical Role of Animal Science Research in Food Security and Sustainability. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2012 - 32.
Zambom MA, dos GT S, Modesto EC, Alcalde CR, Gonçalves GD, da DC S, et al. Nutritional value of soybean hulls, soybean meal, ground corn and wheat meal for cattle. Acta Scientiarum. 2001; 23 :937-943 - 33.
Harper MT, Melgar JO, Nedelkov K, Raisanen S, Chen X, Martins CMMR, et al. Production effects of feeding extruded soybean meal to early-lactation dairy cows. American Dairy Science Association. 2019; 102 :8999-9016 - 34.
Minguez C, Calvo A. Effect of supplementation with fresh orange pulp ( Citrus sinensis ) on mortality, growth performance, slaughter traits and sensory characteristics in meat guinea pigs. Meat Science. 2018;145 :51-54 - 35.
Watanabe PH, Thomas MC, Ruiz US, Santos VM, Masson GC, Fraga AL, et al. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of heavy swine fed different citrus pulp levels. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2019; 62 :921-929 - 36.
Feng D, Zuo J. Nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of rapeseed meal and its utilization as a feed ingredient for animal. Feed and Industrial raw material: Feed. 2003; 37 :265-270 - 37.
Maison TW. Evaluation of the nutritional value of canola meal, 00-rapeseed meal, and 00-rapeseed expellers fed to pigs. Dissertation, University of Illinois; 2013. - 38.
Mugabe LC, Bagaldo AR, Barbosa LP, Araújo FL, Oliveira BYS, Silva RVMM, et al. Biochemical and seminal parameters of lambs fed palm kernel cake under grazing system. Revista Brasileria de Zootecnia. 2017; 46 :670-677 - 39.
Suhaimi D, SMA S. Nutritional value variation in local palm kernel cake for animal feeds. Malaysian Journal of Veterinary Research. 2018; 9 :165-170 - 40.
Bringel LML, Neiva JNM, Araújo VL, Bomfim MAD, Restle J, Ferreira ACH, et al. Consumo, digestibilidade e balanço de nitrogênio em borregos alimentados com torta de dendê em substituição à silagem de capim-elefante. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2012; 40 :1975-1983 - 41.
Oliveira RL, Ribeiro OL, Bagaldo AR, Lima LS dos, Borja MS, Correia BR, Costa JB, Leão AG. Palm kernel cake from biodiesel production on Massai grass ensilage. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Producao Animal. 2011; 12 :881-892 - 42.
Tavares-Samay AMA, Junior WMD, Palhares LO, Lopes CC, Rabello CBV, AHSC C. Determination of nutrient and energy values of cottonseed meal supplemented or not with phytase and protease for broiler chicks. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science. 2019; 48 :e20180142 - 43.
Blasi DA, Drouillard J. Composition and Feeding value of cottonseed feed products for beef cattle. K-States. 2002; 2 :426 - 44.
Xiong ML, Wu XJ, Zhu XF, Zhang WJ. Effects of apple pomace on growth performance, organ indexes and serum biochemical indexes of guanzhong dairy goats. China Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2020; 32 :2683-2689 - 45.
Mirzaei-Aghsaghali A, Maheri-Sis N, Mansouri H, Razeghi ME, Shayegh J, Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A. Evaluating nutritional value of apple pomace for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. Annals of Biological Research. 2011; 2 :100-106 - 46.
Beigh YA, Ganai AM, Ahmad H. Utilisation of apple pomace as livestock feed: A review. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants. 2015; 21 :165-179 - 47.
Daniel I, Sánchez CM, Martínez PE, Ronquillo RR. The use of coffee pulp as a potential alternative supplement in ruminant diets. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A. 2015; 5 :214-217 - 48.
Barcelos AF, Paiva PCA, Pérez JRO, Santos VB, Cardoso RM. Composição química da casca e polpa desidratada de café ( Coffea arabica L.) armazenadas em diferentes períodos. In: II Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil. 2001. pp. 818-825 - 49.
Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Roberto IC. Brewerso spent grain: Generation, characteristics and potential applications. Journal of Cereal Science. 2006; 43 :1-14 - 50.
Dewhurst RJ, Davies DR, Merry RJ. Microbial protein supply from the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2000; 85 :1-21 - 51.
Daghir NJ. Poultry production in hot climates. 2nd ed. London, UK: CABI; 2008 - 52.
Rahim M, Alimon AR, Ivan M. Effects of fungal treatment on the in vitro digestion of palm kernel cake. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2010;22 - 53.
Nuzul I. Characteristics of Malaysian palm kernel cake and its products. Journal of Oil Palm Research. 2013; 25 :245-252 - 54.
NRPH (National Range and Pasture Handbook), 190-vi; 1997 - 55.
Alimon AR. The nutritive value of palm kernel cake for animal feed. Journal of Oil Palm Research. 2004; 40 :12-16 - 56.
Beynen AC, Schonewille JT, Terpstra AHM. Influence of amount and type of dietary fat on plasma cholesterol concentrations in goats. Small Ruminant Research. 2000; 35 :141-147 - 57.
Kung L. The Role of Fiber in Ruminant Ration Formulation. Department of Animal and Food Sciences of University of Delaware Newark, Delaware, USA; 2014 - 58.
Mirzaei-Aghsaghali A, Maheri-SIS N. Importance of physically effective fiber in ruminant nutrition: A review. Annals of Biological Research. 2011; 2 :262-270 - 59.
Kaur H, Arora SP. Dietary effects on ruminant livestock reproduction with particular reference to protein. Nutrition Research Reviews. 1995; 8 :121-136 - 60.
Rukkwamsuk T. Effect of nutritional on reproductive performance of postparturient dairy cows in the Tropics: A review. Thai Journal of Veterinary Medical. 2011; 41 :103-107 - 61.
Meikle AM, Brun V, Carriquiry M, Soca P, Sosa C, Adrien ML, et al. Influences of nutrition and metabolism on reproduction of the female ruminant. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Ruminant Reproduction Symposium. 2018 - 62.
Bisinotto RS, Greco LF, Ribeiro ES, Martinez N, Lima FS, Staples CR, et al. Influences of nutrition and metabolism on fertility of dairy cows. Animal Reproduction. 2012; 9 :260-272 - 63.
Shin EK, Jeong JK, Choi IS, Kang HG, Hur TY, Jung YH, et al. Relationships among ketosis, serum metabolites, body condition, and reproductive outcomes in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2015; 84 :252-260 - 64.
Nolan CJ, Neuendorff DA, Godfrey RW, Hams PG, Welsh TH, Mcarthur NH, et al. Influence of dietary energy intake on prepubertal development of Brahman bulls. Journal of Animal Science. 1990; 68 :1087-1096 - 65.
CBRA – Colégio Brasileiro de Reprodução Animal. Manual para exame andrológico e avaliação de sémen animal. 3 ed. Belo Horizonte; 2013. - 66.
Martin-Rillo S. Bora semen evaluation in practice. Reproduction Domestics Animal. 1996; 31 :519-526 - 67.
Unanian MM, Silva AEDF, McManus C, Cardoso EP. Características biométricas testiculares para avaliação de touros Zubuínos da raça Nelore. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2000; 29 :136-144 - 68.
Soderquist L, Hulten F. Normal values for the scrotal circumference in rams of Gotlandic Breed. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 2006; 41 :61-62 - 69.
Oldham CM, Adams NR, Gherardi PB, Lindsay DR, Mackintosh JB. The influence of level of feed intake on sperm-producing capacity of testicular tissue in the ram. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1978; 29 :173-179 - 70.
Cameron AWN, Murphy PM, Oldham CM. Nutrition of rams and output of spermatozoa. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production. 1988; 17 :162-165 - 71.
Martinez JM, Dominguez B, Barrientos M, Canseco R, Ortega E, Lamothe C. Biometry and testicular growth influenced by nutrition on prepubertal pelibuey lambs. Online Journal of Animal Feed Research. 2012; 2 :314-321 - 72.
AOAC – Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC International; 1990 - 73.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dietary Science. 1991; 74 :3583-3597 - 74.
Hall MB. Neutral Detergent-soluble Carbohydrates. Gainesville: Nutritional Relevance and Analysis; 2000 - 75.
Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. 3a ed. Viçosa, MG: UFV; 2002 - 76.
NRC – National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science; 2001 - 77.
Martin GB, Blache D, Miller DW, Vercoe PE. Interactions between nutrition and reproduction in the management of the mature male ruminant. Animal. 2010; 4 :1214-1226 - 78.
Santos AX, Kahwage PR, Faturi C, Quinzeiro Neto T, Lourenço Júnior JB, Joele MRSP, et al. Feed supplementation with palm kernel cake-based concentrate increases the quality of water buffalo semen. Animal Reproduction. 2014; 11 :85-95 - 79.
Rege JO, Toe F, Mukasa-Mugerwa E, Tembely S, Anindo D, Baker RL, et al. Reproductive characteristics of Ethiopian highland sheep. II Genetic parameters of semen characteristics and their relationship with testicular measurements in ram lambs. Small Ruminant Research. 2000; 37 :173-187 - 80.
Cheah Y, Yang W. Functions of essential nutrition for high quality spermatogenesis. Advanced in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2011; 2 :182-197 - 81.
Azizunnesa BF, Bari FY, Alam MGS. Effects of concentrate supplementation on reproductive performances and semen quality of indigenous rams in Bangladesh. Journal of Embryo Transfer. 2013; 28 :325-335 - 82.
El-Azab AI, Khadrb NA, Zahran K. Effect of non-protein nitrogen in the ration on semen quality. Small Ruminant Research. 1998; 27 :73-77