Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.
We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.
To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India:
CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd.
www.cbspd.com
|
customercare@cbspd.com
Center for Autonomous Solar Power, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA
Tara P. Dhakal
Center for Autonomous Solar Power, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA
*Address all correspondence to: psvasekar@yahoo.com, tpdhakal@gmail.com
1. Introduction
In a p-n junction photovoltaic (PV) cell, a photon of light produces an electron hole pair if the energy of the photon is at least equal to the band gap of the material constituting the p-n junction. The electrons and holes first diffuse toward the respective edge of the depletion region, and then drift across the junction due to the built-in potential and are collected at the electrodes. Thus, materials with long minority carrier life times and high carrier mobilities are desired for high efficiency. Because electrons have higher mobility than the holes, a p-type semiconductor is used as light absorber in a p-n junction solar cell.
The theoretical efficiency limit for an ideal homo-junction solar cell as calculated by Loferski [1] is 23%, and this maximum efficiency falls in the vicinity of the absorbers with band gap energy of 1.5 eV. A more justifiable theoretical efficiency limit that used atomic processes was put forward by Shockley and Queisser [2] later in the sixties. According to this theoretical efficiency limit, also known as the Shockley-Queisser limit, a maximum efficiency of 30% for a band gap of 1.1 eV is possible (assuming only radiative recombination) if exposed to the sunlight of global air mass 1.5.
The most recent data published in Progress in Photovoltaics [3] depict an efficiency of 25% for a crystalline silicon (Si) solar cell measured under the global AM 1.5 spectrum at 25°C. This value of efficiency approaches the theoretical value set by Shockley-Queisser limit. However, coupled with its low absorption cross section and high synthesis and processing cost, this first generation crystalline Si- solar cell doesn’t show promise for a low cost, thin film PV device.
For thin film technologies, amorphous silicon-hydrogen alloy (a-Si) solar cells have exhibited efficiencies in the 10-12% range [4] and are fabricated with low cost technology. However, degradation of the performance over time is a major issue associated with the a-Si solar cells. Recently, metal induced crystallization of a-Si is used to make thin film polycrystalline Si-solar cell at relatively low temperature in an effort to reduce the processing cost [5], but fabrication of these devices is combined with high temperature chemical vapor deposition, which makes it incompatible with roll-to-roll processing. Other emerging second generation solar cells are thin film chalcogenides like CIGS (CuInGaSe2) and CdTe, which show terrestrial cell efficiency of 20.3% and 16.5% respectively [6,7]. The scarcity, cost and toxicity associated with In, Ga, and Cd elements present in these cells limit their sustainability in the future.
Thus wide spread applications of solar cells will require dramatic decrease in cost through the use of non-toxic, inexpensive, and earth-abundant materials. The drawbacks in the present PV materials motivate us to look for alternatives. Due to the low absorption cross section, crystalline silicon requires thick layers, which will increase costs. Amorphous silicon (a-Si) has a higher absorption cross section and low processing cost compared to its crystalline counterpart, but it has stability problems. GaAs based solar cells have high efficiency, but the arsenic toxicity and the substrate cost limit their use. CIGS thin film solar cells show promise if the scarce and costly indium and gallium could be replaced by other elements. The quaternary compound semiconductor CZTS (Cu2ZnSnS4) [8] possesses promising characteristic optical properties; band-gap energy of about 1.5 eV and large absorption coefficient in the order of 104 cm−1. The highly efficient CdTe solar cell is promising, but has obstacles such as cadmium toxicity, tellurium scarcity, and cost. While the results of research and commercialization of crystalline Si, GaAs, CIGS, CdTe, etc. cells are commendable, a search for alternative materials is indispensable and necessary to achieve low cost, light weight, and low toxicity arrays.
Figure of Merits of CZTS, Zn3P2 and FeS2 toward a PV cell compiled from the literature. †Although the exact value of the electron diffusion length of CZTS is not available, the quantum efficiency (QE) spectra suggest a relatively lower carrier diffusion length for this material.
In a recent study [9], a number of promising solar cell materials including CZTS, Zn3P2, and FeS2 etc. were identified as materials with low extraction cost. It is estimated that the cost of material extraction for CZTS, Zn3P2 and FeS2 is around 0.005 cents/W, 0.0007 cents/W and 0.000002 cents/W respectively. More encouraging is the fact that the constituent materials of these absorbers are abundant in the earth’s crust. The light absorption cross sections for CZTS, Zn3P2 and FeS2 are all greater than 104 cm-1 (Table 1), thus making thin film devices practical. The band gaps are also in the optimum range for efficient photo-energy conversion. These three contenders will be discussed mainly in this review with some discussion on other earth-abundant candidates such as tin sulfide (SnS).
Thin film solar cells based on Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 and CdTe have demonstrated significant improvement in the last few years, and they are also being transferred to production levels [18,19]. Out of these two technologies, CIGS based solar cells are the most efficient ones at the laboratory level and have demonstrated efficiencies in the range of 20% [6]. However, both CIGS and CdTe based thin film solar cells are hindered by potential environmental hazard issues [20] and scarcity issues associated with the constituent elements: mainly Te, In, Ga, and to some extent, Se [20,21]. Recent research trends are moving towards finding alternatives based on earth-abundant and non-toxic elements. An alternative material Cu(Zn,Sn)(S,Se)2 is being explored these days by the thin film photovoltaics community which contains earth-abundant materials like Zn and Sn. CZTS structure can be derived from CuInS2 chalcopyrite structure by replacing one-half of the constituent indium atoms by zinc and other half by tin. The resulting bandgap varies in the range of 0.8 eV for a selenide structure to 1.5 eV for a sulfide structure [22]. Copper-Zinc-Tin Sulfide or Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) has a nearly ideal direct bandgap (1.5 eV) to absorb the most of the visible solar spectrum as well as a high absorption coefficient (104 cm-1). CZTS film contains neither rare metals nor toxic materials, and combined with the cadmium-free buffer layer, we can expect solar cells with complete non-toxicity.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the complete CZTSeS solar cell.
Several preparation methods have been reported in literature for preparation of CZTS solar cells [23]. These are physical vapor methods such as sulfurization of e-beam evaporated metallic layers and sputtered layers [24,25], RF magnetron sputtering [26], co-evaporation [27], hybrid sputtering [28]. Chemical methods involve sulfurization of electrochemically deposited metallic precursors [29], photochemical deposition [30], sol-gel sulfurization methods [31], sol-gel spin-coated deposition [32] and spray pyrolysis [33,34]. In addition, there are syntheses based on solution methods [35,36].
Ever since Nakazawa reported the photovoltaic effect in a heterodiode of CZTS in 1988 [37], research in CZTS field has come a long way. The current highest efficiency for solution-processed CZTSeS based solar cells is 10.1% [38]. The efficiency for pure CZTS based solar cells that use the vacuum based approach is reported to be 8.4% [39]. The Schematic of a CZTSeS solar cell is as shown in Fig.1.
2.2. Crystal Structure
CIGSeS based films are mostly crystallized with a chalcopyrite structure [40], while CZTSeS based films exhibit either a Kesterite type of crystal structure or Stannite structure [41]. Because XRD peaks for Kesterite structure are similar to Stannite structure, it is difficult to distinguish between them unless other measurement techniques, such as neutron diffraction or Raman spectroscopy, are also employed. All three crystal structures are shown in Fig. 2 in order to understand the similarity and difference between them. It is also quite likely that both Kesterite and Stannite structures co-exist simultaneously because there is not much of energy difference for these structures to achieve/attain a stable state [41].
Figure 2.
Chalcopyrite, Kesterite and Stannite crystal structures.
2.3. Electronic properties
The band-gap is the most important property of a photovoltaic material and near-optimum band-gap value around 1.5 eV is supposed to be ideal for effective photon absorption and photo-generation. CZTSe phase has a band-gap of 0.8 eV, while CZTS phase has a band-gap value of 1.5 eV [22]. The band-gap can be engineered between these two values by adding sulfur to CZTSe phase. The doping behavior in Kesterite is also controlled by intrinsic doping similar to their chalcopyrite counterparts. The p-type behavior of CZTSeS phase is controlled by CuZn or CuSn antisite donor defects, or this may also result due to direct creation of copper vacancy and compensation for ZnCu antisite and the S vacancy [41].
2.4. Phase stability
Similar to CIGSeS thin films, CZTSeS phase also has a narrow region of phase stability in which the device quality phase can be synthesized without any adverse effect of secondary phases. In fact, the phase stability region is even narrower as compared to chalcopyrites, thus making single phase device quality CZTSeS synthesis more difficult [42]. Solid state CZTS can also be synthesized through reactions between ZnS, Cu2S,and SnS2. As can be seen in the phase diagram in Fig. 3, there is very narrow region where CZTS is stable and secondary phases are very easy to form. Copper-poor and zinc-rich composition has been found to be ideal so far to obtain efficient devices from CZTS films [8].
Figure 3.
Ternary phase diagram of the Cu2S-ZnS-SnS2 system. (Reprinted from [42] with permission from Elsevier).
2.5. Synthesis techniques
2.5.1. Vacuum based approaches ( sputtering/evaporation)
The synthesis techniques are both vacuum-based processes and non-vacuum based processes. Dr. Katagiri’s group has pioneered vacuum-based approaches [8,22,24,43]. Their first report on E-B evaporated precursors followed by sulfurization yielded an efficiency of 0.66% [24]. With modification of fabrication process, the conversion efficiency was gradually increased in their successive reports. It was observed that longer time and temperature cycles were detrimental for the performance of the CZTS films: hence, by adjusting the time and temperature cycles, Katagiri et al reported an efficiency of 2.62% in their next report [14]. After overcoming the problem of residual gases in the sulfurization chamber, the efficiency number rose to 5.45% [44].
This group has also contributed towards sputtered CZTS films followed by sulfurization [43] and reported an efficiency of 6.7%. They observed that soaking the CZTS layer on the Mo coated sodalime glass in deionized water leads to significant improvement in the device performance. Recently, they also reported 6.48% efficiency using CZTS compound target and a simple single sputtering step [45].
In 2010, IBM group reported an efficiency of 6.8% by using co-evaporated film of Cu, Zn, Sn and S sources followed by reactive annealing [46]. The best efficiency so far for pure sulfide phase CZTS is 8.4% [39], as noted in the IBM group report for evaporated CZTS films. Also, they recently reported an efficiency for pure selenide phase using co-evaporation is 8.9% [47]. An NREL group reports the best efficiency for pure selenide phase CZTSe as 9.15% [48]. The highest reported efficiency using vacuum based techniques is 9.3% [49], which is for mixed CZTSeS phase using co-sputtering of compound targets followed by annealing at a higher temperature. This report is by an industrial research group ( AQT Solar ).
Some other notable recent reports on vacuum based approaches are as follows:
In the quest to obtain Cd-free devices, the researchers at Solar Frontier, Japan recently demonstrated an efficiency of 6.3% for In-based hetero-junction partners and 5.8% for Zn-based hetero-junction partners [50].
The same group in Japan reports > 8% efficiency on CZTS sub-module [51]. Another interesting and note-worthy contribution here is that the absorber thickness is reported to be just 600 nm.
Salomé et al demonstrate that incorporation of H2 is beneficial for preventing Zn loss during the sulfurization [52].
Shin et al mention that stacking of precursors has a role in getting single-phase final CZTS compound and reducing the secondary phases [53].
Chalapathy and co-workers demonstrate an efficiency of 4.59% using ZnSn (60:40at%) alloy target [54].
2.5.2. Electrodeposition
Electro-deposition is of particular interest for the thin film photovoltaics community due to the advantages it offers: low cost, environment friendly, large area deposition, room temperature growth, and less or almost no wastage of materials. CIGS technology based on electro-deposition has already been commercialized [55]. There are numerous reports on electro-deposition of CZTS as well [29,56,57]. Most of the reported efficiencies are in the range of 3% to 4% for electro-deposited CZTS films [57-59].
Some other notable recent reports on electro-deposited CZTS films are as follows:
Li et al recently demonstrated 1.7% efficiency in CZTSe films prepared by co-electro-deposition [60].
Mali et al used a successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method for CZTS films. In this method, a substrate is immersed into separately placed cations and anions. This particular electro-chemical method is used for making uniform and large area thin films [61].
2.5.3. Spray pyrolysis
Spray pyrolysis is a versatile as well as a low-cost technique that has been used to deposit semiconductor films. In this process, a thin film is deposited by spraying a solution on a hot surface. The constituents react to form a chemical compound. The chemical reactants are selected such that the products other than the desired compound are volatile at the temperature of deposition [62]. There have been early reports of sprayed CZTS films [33].
Some other notable recent reports on sprayed CZTS films are as follows:
Prabhakar et al prepared CZTS films using ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and observed that sodium plays an important role in CZTS films as well [63]. This observation similar to CIGS films and the role of sodium in CIGS films is well known. The authors observed that sodium enhanced (112) orientation and grain size of the CZTS films also increased the hole carrier concentration.
In another report, authors prepared CZTS films using two different tin precursors: stannous as well as stannic chloride [64]. They observed that crystallinity and grain size as well as carrier concentration and mobility values were better for films prepared using stannic chloride.
2.5.4. Solution based methods
Direct liquid deposition or ‘ink’ based approaches are attractive due to their compatibility with high volume manufacturing techniques such as printing. It is a low-cost scalable route for the thin film solar technology. One of the popular approaches is to prepare precursors using sol-gel method, then sulfurize it, and deposit on substrate using spin-coating [65]. The micro-particles of CZTS have also been prepared using ball milling, sintering type of processes and later screen printed on flexible substrates [66]. There are various other reports using colloidal nanoparticles [67], Photochemical deposition [30] etc.
The researchers at IBM in their recent publication have reported the highest record efficiency by any process so far for CZTSeS as 10.1% [38]. The J-V curve of this record sample and cross-sectin of the CZTSeS film is as shown in Fig. 4. Here metal chalcogenides were dissolved in hydrazine solution and later spin-coated on glass-substrates followed by a heat-treatment at 540°C.
Some other notable recent reports on solution/ink based CZTS films are as follows:
Using band-gap engineering with Germanium, researchers at Purdue University have achieved an efficiency of 8.4%. They have utilized nanoparticles of CZTSeS on Moly-coated glass substrates [68].
The researchers at DuPont have demonstrated an efficiency of 8.5% [69]. They use binary and ternary chalcogenide nanocrystals produced by simple colloidal syntheses.
Figure 4.
J–V characteristics of the record 10.1% sample at AM1.5G simulated illumination along-with CZTSSe film cross-section (Reprinted from[38] with permission from John Wiley and Sons).
2.6. Current status
The laboratory level efficiencies are more than 10% [38] and there are some recent reports of sub-module efficiencies of more than 8% [51]. However, the technology still needs to go a long way before it can be commercialized. The complex phase diagram and material properties impose most of the challenges. Also, the narrow stoichiometry window for a stable CZTS phase requires a robust control on composition. The processing window is even narrower compared to their CIGS counterparts. The volatile nature of some components, such as tin sulfide and zinc, impedes further challenges for traditional vacuum-based processing approaches which require high sulfurization/selenization temperatures after precursor deposition. The secondary phases formed are difficult to detect with conventional techniques such as XRD due to the overlapping peaks with pure CZTS phase. The interface properties with hetero-junction partners need to be studied well. However, the initial results in last few years look quite promising.
With rise in the prices and non-abundance of the materials such as indium and gallium current research trends in thin film solar cells have been moving toward development of earth-abundant solar cell materials that can be synthesized using low-cost processes. Also, zinc-based hetero-junction partners are preferred over toxic cadmium based compounds such as Cadmium sulfide [70]. Zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) is an important optoelectronic material, which also has applications in lithium ion batteries [71]. It is an important semiconductor from the II-V group, and is used for optoelectronic applications [13,72-74]. Zinc phosphide exhibits favorable optoelectronic properties, such as direct bandgap of 1.5 eV, which corresponds to the optimum solar energy conversion range [74-77]. Zinc phosphide has a large optical absorption coefficient of >104 cm-1, hence it can be positively used as a p-type absorber [78]. Also, due to its long minority diffusion length of ~10 µm, high current collection efficiency can be yielded. Zinc, as well as phosphorous, is abundant in the earth’s crust. This makes their cost-effective development quite feasible when it comes to large scale production [73,79]. Zinc phosphide is a tetragonal p-type low cost material with lattice constants of a = b =8.097 Å and c=11.45 Å [17] and has all the right characteristics for photo conversion. Zn3P2 is synthesized most of times with a p-type conductivity [80].
3.2. Early efforts
Thin film solar cell devices using Zn3P2 have been fabricated using Schottky contacts, p-n semiconductor hetero-junctions [81] or liquid contacts [82]. Zinc phosphide was explored extensively in the early eighties and nineties [11,78,80,83,84]. With a Schottky diode, an efficiency as high as 6% was demonstrated [78]. Zinc phosphide homo-junctions have been difficult to make. However, even a zinc phosphide hetero-junction solar cell has not been successful with an efficiency range around 2% [11,85,86].
The researchers at the Institute of Energy Conversion were leaders in the early eighties in exploring Zn3P2 [78,80,83,87,88]. They demonstrated the effect of Mg doping and also fabricated Schottky barrier solar cells [78,88]. They also successfully made hetero-junction solar cells using ZnO as a hetero-junction partner [11].
Another interesting study is by Misiewicz et al [89]. They made various metal contacts (Au, Ag, Sb, Al, Mg) with Zn3P2 and measured current-voltage characteristics. It was observed that Ag and Sb made the best ohmic contacts, while Au, Mg and Al exhibited rectifying properties. Mg was found to be the most useful for making Schottky barriers.
3.3. Synthesis technqiues
Some of the synthesis techniques to grow Zn3P2 are summarized below :
3.3.1. Vapor transport
Catalano et al [90] report synthesis of Zn3P2 by vapor transport using perforated capsule technique. Crystals were grown in silica tubes placed mid-way in a capsule immediately ahead of Zn3P2 charge. When heated at a high temperature (900°C), effusion of zinc and phospherous out of the inner growth capsule resulted in the condensation of Zn3P2 on the walls of outer tube’s cooler portion.A similar vapor transport technique has been reported by Wang et al [91] for growing single crystal Zn3P2.
3.3.2. Evaporation
Deiss et al report synthesis of Zn3P2 thin film by direct evaporation of Zn3P2 on glass substrates in a vacuum chamber at 750°C [92]. The films deposited on a cold substrate were reported as amorphous, while the films deposited on a heated sunstrate (>300°C) were reported as crystalline. In a similar technique, Murali et al report that films grown with source-substrate distance < 3 cm were crystalline in nature [93].
3.3.3. Metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD)
Kakishita et al report a low-pressure MOCVD system with dimethylzinc (DMZ) and diluted phosphine (PH3) as reactant gas [72]. Phosphine was cracked at 800°C and Zn3P2 films were grown on ZnSe single crystal substrates at a growth temperature of 290-410°C. Hermann et al report use of diethlzinc (DEZ) as a zinc precursor [15].
3.3.4. Electrodeposition
Soliman et al [94] report electrodepositon of Zn3P2 with SnO2 coated glass as working electrode and the aqueous solution containing different concentrations of both ZnCl2, ZnSO4 and Na2PO3. The pH was adjusted at 2.5 by adding H2SO4. It was observed that Zn3P2was obtained, and the degree of crystallinity increased with higher Zn/P molar ratio. There is a recent report similar to that of Soliman et al, reporting electrodeposition of Zn3P2 [95].
3.3.5. Chemical reflux technique
Recently our group has successfully synthesized Zn3P2 using chemical reflux technique [96,97]. The zinc-coated glass substrate is placed on the top of a fritted glass, which is sorrounded by trioctylphosphine (TOP) liquid. The entire vessel is heated while vapors of TOP are refluxed back to the bottom of the glass vessel by a condenser connected at the top of the vessel. The glass vessel is heated to 350°C for two to four hours, and then slowly cooled to room temperature. It was observed that zinc phosphide can be successfully synthesized using this simple chemical route in both nano-wire and thin film forms depending on the exposure mechanism of the phosphorous precursor with the zinc-deposited substrates.
3.4. Current status
Recently Kimball et al have studied the effect of magnesium doping on Zn3P2 thin films [98,99]. Our group has recently demonstrated that zinc phosphide can be successfully synthesized in both nano-wire and thin film forms [96,97]. Efforts are ongoing to improve the photovoltaic properties using various hetero-junction partner options.
Pyrite (FeS2) is a non-toxic material and is abundant on earth, and has a potential to be an inexpensive and sustainable alternative for achieving low-cost and high-efficiency solar cells due both to its environmental compatibility and its optimal optical properties for efficient energy conversion. Its energy band gap of 0.95 eV and optical absorption coefficient of the order of 105 cm-1 are in the optimal range for efficient conversion of sunlight into electricity [12,100]. A saturation current of 40 to 50 mA/cm2 for a thickness between 0.2 µm to 1 µm is possible for pyrite [101]. In addition, a carrier mobility of 200 cm2/Vs and sufficiently high minority carrier lifetimes makes pyrite highly favorable for photovoltaic application [102]. It has been calculated that theoretical conversion efficiency close to 30% is possible because its band gap is quite close to silicon.
Iron pyrite, like other metal chalcogenides, received considerable attention after the photoelectrochemical solar cells using FeS2 single crystal electrodes in contact with iodide/tri-iodide (I−/I3−) redox electrolyte exhibited a quantum efficiency close to 100% across a n-FeS2/(I− /I3−) interface [103-105]. However, a solar conversion efficiency of this photochemical cell was only 2.8% when illuminated under AM 1.5. The open circuit voltage (Voc) was 187 mV. This value of Voc is lower than the theoretical value of about 500 mV [106]. The low photo-potential is attributed to the strong pinning of the Fermi level caused by surface states [105] as well as bulk defects caused by the sulphur deficiency [107].
It should be noted that numerous iron sulphides exist in nature with unique properties depending on different iron (Fe) and sulphur (S) stoichiometric ratios and different crystal structures. Thus creating a phase pure iron pyrite is a challenge. Orthorhombic marcasite FeS2 and hexagonal troilite FeS are both common iron sulfur phases, but because they have much smaller band gaps (0.34 eV for marcasite and 0.04 eV for troilite), even trace amounts would significantly diminish the photovoltaic properties of the pyrite [108]. So, examining the preparation of pyrite by using various techniques is important.
4.2. Synthesis techniques
Some of the experimental techniques used to grow pyrite are summarized below:
4.2.1. Chemical vapor transport (CVT)
This technique involves high crystal growth with halogens, such as Br2 and Cl2, and polycrystalline FeS2 sealed in an ampoule [109]. This process produced cubic crystals with (111) and (100) faces up to 5 mm edge length. However, the growth process was too long (10 days) and was performed at high temperature (~1000°C). At elevated temperatures, segregation of sulphur and iron species is unavoidable.
4.2.2. Metal organic chemical vapor depositon (MOCVD)
Iron source, such as iron penta-carbonyl [Fe (CO)5], and sulphur sources such as sulphur and H2S gas, are used in this technique [102]. The advantage of this technique is that the growth temperature is low (150°C) and the growth process is fast.
4.2.3. Spray pyrolysis
Chemical spray pyrolysis is used to grow FeS2 using thiourea and FeCl2 [110]. Chlorine contamination, slow growth, non-uniformity, reduced repeatability are some issues associated with this technique.
4.2.4. Chemical methods
A recent synthesis approach to grow a single phase FeS2 nanoparticle is carried out by different groups using hydrothermal process [108,111]. Wadia and his group show single phase growth of FeS2 nanoparticles. On the other hand, colloidal FeS2 nano-crystal ink by using a hot-injection method has been synthesized by many groups [112-116]. These processes are encouraging in that these are low temperature processes and variation in particle sizes allows the manipulation of band gap, which will help to absorb a broader spectrum of sunlight. To translate these nanocrystals into a form of a compact thin film layer is a challenge [113,116,117].
4.2.5. Sulfurization of iron oxides
Sulphurization of iron oxides (Fe3O4 or Fe2O3) is predicted by Gibbs free energy phase diagram to give FeS2 films [118]. Smestad et. al, sulphurized Fe3O4 or Fe2O3 using gaseous sulphur at 350°C. However, they didn‘t observe a good photovoltaic behavior from the photochemical cells made by using the FeS2 films grown this way. One of the main reasons attributed to the poor photocurrent and voltage is the presence of micro-pinholes, which led to a short circuit in the photogenerated current and effectively shunted the pyrite cell. Recently, defect-free pyrite thin films were synthesized from iron oxide by using non-toxic and a more controllable organic precursor such as Di-tert butyl disulfide (TBDS) [119].
4.2.6. Sulfurization of iron
It is also claimed by another group that iron oxide route is not necessary to grow pyrite [12]. They used iron film and sulphurized it under nitrogen flux. But their films had a presence of an amorphous phase, which caused an indirect transion at 1.31 eV incompatible with the strong absorption of FeS2
4.3. Issues to be addressed for an optimal FeS2 cell
Low open circuit (Voc) in pyrite solar cell is attributed to sulphur deficiency among other reasons [120]. A correlation between S deficiency and the transport parameters of pyrite was found, indicating that high quality intrinsic material can be prepared when the S/Fe ratio is close to the stoichiometric value of 2 [121]. In addition to the intrinsic material property, a device design would also affect Voc.
4.3.1. Influence of cell design on Voc
The electrical and optical properties of FeS2 are promising for an efficient photovoltaic action, but the conversion efficiency of the FeS2 cell is not impressive: 1% with Schottky type solar cells [101] and 2.8% with photochemical cells. Cells fabricated with Schottky contacts exhibited short circuit currents (Jsc) below 10 mA/cm2 and open circuit voltages (Voc) below 20 mV. However, quantum efficiencies of 90% and above and high photo-current density observed in the latter type of the cell indicate the potential of an efficient pyrite based solar cell. The reason for the low efficiency was due to low open circuit voltage of about 200 mV. The interfacial chemistry of the p-n junction plays a role in dictating the open circuit voltage. A solar cell structure with a wide band gap window layer, such as ZnS, may improve the open circuit voltage.
4.3.2. Stoichiometry of FeS2
The ratio of Fe and S is extremely important to obtain a defect-free FeS2 phase. It is necessary that the homogeneity range should be within 1%. It was shown in pyrite grown by MOCVD that whenever a stoichiometry is such that the composition of S is less than 2, a phase mixture of pyrite and pyrrhotite (FeS) existed. The band gap of pyrrhotite phase is 0.04 eV, which greatly diminishes the photovoltaic action. Thus reaffirmation of the pyrite stoichiometry is important.
4.3.3. Influence of doping on Voc
A recent work on simulation of p-n type FeS2 homo-junction diffusion limited solar cells showed that efficiencies around 20% are possible [101] by assuming that at low doping density Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) recombination [122,123] limits the carrier life time, or in other words, the cell efficiency. Altermatt et. al [101] simulated a case where the carrier life time (t) limits only Voc, e.g. a cell with d = 1 µm and t = 100 ns. The optimally obtainable photo-current in pyrite under AM 1.5G illumination is about 50 mA/cm2. The achievable efficiency level then was 18.5% (13.5%) in a highly (lowly) doped cell. There is trade-off between the carrier life time and open circuit voltage. For a high density of carriers, the voltage across the junction increases, which may create a higher Voc provided the recombination of the generated carriers is prevented. This is possible with the low carrier density (thus low dopant induced defects) case where the carrier life time is longer. Thus a subtle balance between Voc and excess carrier life time should be sought by carefully choosing the right dopant density. It was observed in Cobalt doped FeS2 that by manipulating the carrier concentration, the grain barrier height can be changed, which in turn will change the photo-voltage [124].
4.3.4. Fermi level pinning at the surface
Low photo-voltage in a pyrite solar cell is dependent upon its surface structure. Ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS) measurements carried out in Cobalt doped FeS2 showed that the Fermi level at the surface is pinned [125], implying high density of surface. Thus controlling the dopant density with a high level of precision is critical. In a situation where surface defects are unavoidable, application of a resistive thin layer, such as n-type i-ZnO, could be helpful.
4.4. Recent progress in FeS2 solar cell device
Recently Ganta et. al fabricated solid state based FeS2 thin film solar cell using CdS as an n-type layer [116]. The super-strate type cell structure was glass/FTO/CdS/FeS2/Ag/Cr. FeS2 layer was formed by drop casting the FeS2 nanoparticle ink directly onto the CdS layer at room temperature. The efficiency for CdS/FeS2 cell was 0.03%. The low efficiency was due to the low short-circuit current. The open-circuit voltage was high, which is large compared to a previously reported value of 200 mV [106].
Although the circuit current was low at 0.01 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage of 565 mV was observed. Residual organic components present in the nanoparticle-film could be a reason for low short-circuit current. A compact film with the organic residues removed can be expected to improve the short-circuit current and the cell efficiency.
Figure 5.
Dark and light I-Vcurves of the FeS2 super-strate solar cell.
In a recent study, a number of materials were screened based on their abundance and non-toxicity, and semiconducting compounds composed of these identified materials were listed [126]. The authors found that even if binary compounds are focused, there are a good number of alternatives. Once semiconducting properties such as ideal band-gap and minority carrier diffusion length are considered, the next step is the processing capability. Obtaining the right phase without any defects is crucial. The next step is to identify ideal hetero-juction partner with right band-alignment as well as chemical and mechanical compatibility. Several other earth-abundant candidates are being researched these days.
Tin Sulfide (SnS) is metal chalcogenide semiconductor material from the IV-VI group. It has a near optimum direct bandgap of ~ 1.3 eV [127] and also a good absorption co-efficient (105 cm−1) [128]. Elements such as tin and sulfur are abundantly available. Tin sulfide has been synthesized using a variety of techniques such as sputtering [127], evaporation [129], electrodeposition [130] as well as chemical routes [131]. The highest reported efficiency to date is 1.3% [132].
Cu2FeSnS4 (CFTS) with Stannite structure can also be a viable alternative and there are some recent reports of growing CFTS nanocrystals [133,134]. The bandgap of CFTS was found to be ~ 1.28 eV with p-type conductivity [134].
In a recent study, Fernandes et al identified ternary sulfides Cu2SnS3 and Cu3SnS4 as good alternatives [135]. The estimated bandgap values are between 1 to 1.6 eV and absorption coefficient 104 cm−1.
Cu2S is another interesting material that was extensively researched in the eighties. However, performance degradation due to copper diffusion led this technology to be abandoned. Cu2S has a bandgap of 1.2 eV [136]. The highest reported efficiency was 9.1% [137]. Recently this material has again received attention and innovative approaches, such as nanocrystals, are being implemented to overcome the issues encountered in the past [138].
One of the important p-type absorber CZTSe(S) has reached a laboratory level efficiency of more than 10% and has matured to a stage where it can be seriously considered for commercialization. Complex phase diagram and narrow stoichilometry window for CZTS remains a challenge; in addition, interface properties with suitable hetero-junction partners need to be understood better. However, despite these challenges, CZTS is the most promising material synthesized using earth-abundant constituents. Other materials discussed in detail in this review are Zn3P2 and FeS2. These two materials also show considerable promise, despite their current low lab-level efficiency values. Apart from these, there are several other promosing materials synthesized using earth-abundant constutuents, such as SnS, CFTS and Cu2SnS3, and these potentially can be used in solar cells due to their photovoltaic properties.
References
1.LoferskiJ. J. J.1956Theoretical Considerations Governing the Choice of the Optimum Semiconductor for Photovoltaic Solar Energy ConversionJ Appl Phys27777
2.ShockleyW.W.1961Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar CellsJ Appl Phys32510
4.GuhaS.S.1986Enhancement of open circuit voltage in high efficiency amorphous silicon alloy solar cellsAppl Phys Lett49218
5.GordonI.CarnelL.Van GestelD.BeaucarneG.PoortmansJ.2007Efficient thin-film polycrystalline-silicon solar cells based on aluminum- induced crystallization and thermal CVDProg Photovoltaics Res Appl1557586
6.JacksonP.HariskosD.LotterE.PaetelS.WuerzR.MennerR.et al.2011New world record efficiency for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells beyond 20%Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl198947
7.WuX. X.2004High-efficiency polycrystalline CdTe thin-film solar cellsSolar Energy7780314
8.KatagiriH.JimboK.MawW. S.OishiK.YamazakiM.ArakiH.et al.2009Development of CZTS-based thin film solar cellsThin Solid Films517245560
9.WadiaC. C.2009Materials Availability Expands the Opportunity for Large-Scale Photovoltaics DeploymentEnviron Sci Technol4320727
10.LiuF.LiY.ZhangK.WangB.YanC.LaiY.et al.2010In situ growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by reactive magnetron co-sputteringSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells9424314
11.NayarP. P. S.1981Zinc phosphide-zinc oxide heterojunction solar cellsAppl Phys Lett39105
12.RezigB.DahmanH.KenzariM.1992Iron pyrite FeS2 for flexible solar cellsRenewable Energy21258
13.BabuV. S.VayaP. R.SobhanadriJ.1988Optical absorption and photoconductivity studies on Zn3P2 thin films grown by hot wall depositionSolar Energy Materials186573
14.KatagiriH. H.2001Development of thin film solar cell based on Cu2ZnSnS4 thin filmsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells651418
15.HermannA. M.MadanA.WanlassM. W.BadriV.AhrenkielR.MorrisonS.et al.2004MOCVD growth and properties of Zn3 P2 and Cd3P2 films for thermal photovoltaic applicationsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells8224152
16.MorsliM. M.1995Electrical Properties of a Synthetic Pyrite FeS Non Stoichiometric CrystalJournal de physique.I : JP5699705
17.SudhakarS.S.2008Influence of cooling rate on the liquid-phase epitaxial growth of Zn3 P2J Cryst Growth310270711
18.DhereN. G.2007Toward GW/year of CIGS production within the next decadeSolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells91137682
19.DhereN. G.2011Scale-up issues of CIGS thin film PV modulesSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells9527780
20.GreenM. M. A.2006Consolidation of thin-film photovoltaic technology: the coming decade of opportunityProgress in photovoltaics1438392
21.AndersonB. A.AzarC.HolmbergJ.KarlssonS.1998Material constraints for thin-film solar cellsEnergy2340711
22.KatagiriH.2005Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cellsThin Solid Films480426
23.FischerederA. A.2010Investigation of Cu ZnSnS Formation from Metal Salts and ThioacetamideChemistry of materials223399406
24.KatagiriH.SasaguchiN.HandoS.HoshinoS.OhashiJ.YokotaT.1997Preparation and evaluation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by sulfurization of E---B evaporated precursorsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells4940714
25.ArakiH.2008Preparation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by sulfurization of stacked metallic layersThin Solid Films5171457
26.SeolJ.LeeS.LeeJ.NamH.KimK.2003Electrical and optical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films prepared by rf magnetron sputtering processSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells7515562
27.TanakaT.KawasakiD.NishioM.GuoQ.OgawaH.2006Fabrication of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by co-evaporationphysica status solidi (c)328447
28.TanakaT.NagatomoT.KawasakiD.NishioM.GuoQ.WakaharaA.et al.2005Preparation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by hybrid sputteringJournal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids66197881
29.ArakiH.KuboY.MikadukiA.JimboK.MawW. S.KatagiriH.et al.2009Preparation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by sulfurizing electroplated precursorsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells939969
30.MoriyaK.WatabeJ.TanakaK.UchikiH.2006Characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films prepared by photo-chemical depositionphysica status solidi (c)3284852
31.TanakaK.OonukiM.MoritakeN.UchikiH.2009Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells prepared by non-vacuum processingSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells935837
32.YehM. M. Y.2009Influences of synthesizing temperatures on the properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 prepared by sol-gel spin-coated depositionJ Sol Gel Sci Technol52658
33.NakayamaN.ItoK.1996Sprayed films of stannite Cu2ZnSnS4Appl Surf Sci921715
34.KamounN.BouzouitaH.RezigB.2007Fabrication and characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis techniqueThin Solid Films515594952
35.RihaS. C.ParkinsonB. A.PrietoA. L.2009Solution-Based Synthesis and Characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 NanocrystalsJ Am Chem Soc131120545
36.TodorovT. K.ReuterK. B.MitziD. B.2010High-Efficiency Solar Cell with Earth-Abundant Liquid-Processed AbsorberAdv Mater22E 1569
37.K. ItoT.N.1988Electrical and optical properties of stannite-type quaternary semiconductor thin filmsJapanese journal of Applied Physics
38.BarkhouseD. A. R.GunawanO.GokmenT.TodorovT.MitziD.2012Device characteristics of a 10.1% hydrazine-processed Cu2ZnSn(Se,S)4 solar cell Characteristics of a 10.1% efficient kesterite solar cellProgress in photovoltaics20611
39.ShinB.GunawanO.ZhuY.BojarczukN. A.CheyS. J.GuhaS.2011Thin film solar cell with 8.4% power conversion efficiency using an earth-abundant Cu2ZnSnS4 absorberProg Photovoltaics Res Appl:n/a,n/a
40.StanberyB. B. J.2002Copper Indium Selenides and Related Materials for Photovoltaic DevicesCritical reviews in solid state and materials sciences2773117
41.SiebentrittS. S.2012Kesterites-a challenging material for solar cells Kesterites-a challenging material for solar cellsProgress in photovoltaics:n,a-n/a
42.OlekseyukI. D.2004Phase equilibria in the Cu2S-ZnS-SnS2 systemJ Alloys Compounds36813543
43.KatagiriH.2008Enhanced conversion efficiencies of Cu2ZnSnSP4based thin film solar cells by using preferential etching techniqueApplied physics express1
44.KatagiriH.JimboK.MoriyaK.TsuchidaK.2003Solar cell without environmental pollution by using CZTS thin filmPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, Proceedings of 3rd World Conference on328742879
45.KatagiriH.JimboK.2011Development of rare metal-free CZTS-based thin film solar cellsPhotovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 37th IEEE00351621
46.WangK.GunawanO.TodorovT.ShinB.CheyS. J.BojarczukN. A.et al.2010Thermally evaporated Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cellsAppl Phys Lett97143508
47.ShinB.ZhuY.BojarczukN. A.CheyS. J.GuhaS.2012High efficiency Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells with a TiN diffusion barrier on the molybdenum bottom contact38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
48.RepinsI.BeallC.VoraN.De HartC.KuciauskasD.DippoP.et al.2012Co-evaporated Cu2ZnSnSe4 films and devicesSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells1011549
49.ChawlaV.ClemensB.2012Effect of Composition on High Efficiency CZTSSe Devices Fabricated Using Co-sputtering of Compound Targets38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
50.HiroiH.SakaiN.MuraokaS.KatouT.SugimotoH.2012Development of High Efficiency Cu2ZnSnS4 Submodule with Cd-Free Buffer Layer38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
52.SaloméP. M. P.MalaquiasJ.FernandesP.FerreiraM.LeitaoJ.CunhaA.et al.2011The influence of hydrogen in the incorporation of Zn during the growth of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin filmsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells951234829
53.ShinS. W.PawarS.ParkC.YunJ.MoonJ.KimJ.et al.2011Studies on Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) absorber layer using different stacking orders in precursor thin filmsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells951232026
54.ChalapathyR. B. V.JungG. S.AhnB. T.2011Fabrication of Cu2ZnSnS4 films by sulfurization of Cu/ZnSn/Cu precursor layers in sulfur atmosphere for solar cellsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells9512321621
55.AksuS.PetheS.Kleiman-ShwarscteinA.KunduS.PinarbasiM.2012Recent Advances in Electroplating Based CIGS Solar Cell Fabrication38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
56.ScraggJ. J.DaleP. J.PeterL. M.ZoppiG.ForbesI.2008New routes to sustainable photovoltaics: evaluation of Cu2ZnSnS4 as an alternative absorber materialphysica status solidi (b)24517728
57.ScraggJ. J.BergD. M.DaleP. J.2010 A 3.2% efficient Kesterite device from electrodeposited stacked elemental layersJ Electroanal Chem646529
58.EnnaouiA.2009Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cells from electroplated precursors: Novel low-cost perspectiveThin Solid Films5172511
59.ArakiH.KuboY.JimboK.MawW.KatagiriH.YamazakiM.et al.2009Preparation of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by sulfurization of co-electroplated Cu-Zn-Sn precursorsphysica status solidi (c)612668
60.LiJ.MaWeiT.LiuM.JiangW.ZhuG. C.2012The Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin films solar cells synthesized by electrodeposition routeAppl Surf Sci25862615
61.MaliS. S.ShindeP. S.BettyC. A.BhosaleP. N.OhY. W.PatilP. S.2012Synthesis and characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films by SILAR methodJournal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids7373540
62.MooneyJ. J. B.1982Spray Pyrolysis ProcessingAnnual review of materials science1281101
63.PrabhakarT.JampanaN.2011Effect of sodium diffusion on the structural and electrical properties of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin filmsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells9510014
64.RajeshmonV. G.KarthaC. S.VijayakumarK. P.SanjeevirajaC.AbeT.KashiwabaY.2011Role of precursor solution in controlling the opto-electronic properties of spray pyrolysed Cu2ZnSnS4 thin filmsSolar Energy8524955
65.TanakaK.MoritakeN.UchikiH.2007Preparation of thin films by sulfurizing sol-gel deposited precursorsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells911199201
66.ZhouZ.WangY.XuD.ZhangY.2010Fabrication of Cu2ZnSnS4 screen printed layers for solar cellsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells9420425
67.ChoryC.ZutzF.WittF.BorchertH.ParisiJ.2010Synthesis and characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4physica status solidi (c)714868
68.GuoQ.FordG. M.YangW.HagesC. J.HillhouseH. W.AgrawalR.2012Enhancing the performance of CZTSSe solar cells with Ge alloyingSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells1051326
69.GuoQ.CaoY.CasparJ.FarnethW.IonkinA.JohnsonL.et al.2012A Simple Solution-based Route to High-Efficiency CZTSSe Thin-film Solar Cells38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
70.KumarB.VasekarP. S.PetheS.DhereN. G.GalymzhanT.2009ZnxCd1-xS as a heterojunction partner for CuIn1-xGaxS2 thin film solar cellsThin Solid Films51722959
71.ShenG.ChenP.BandoY.GolbergD.ZhouC.2008Single-Crystalline and Twinned Zn3P2 Nanowires: Synthesis, Characterization, and Electronic PropertiesThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C1121640510
72.KakishitaK.AiharaK.SudaT.1994Zn3P2 photovoltaic film growth for Zn3P2/ZnSe solar cellSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells3533340
73.MisiewiczJ.BryjaL.JezierskiK.SzatkowskiJ.MirowskaN.GumiennyZ.et al.1994Zn3P2 new material for optoelectronic devicesMicroelectron J252328
74.LousaA.BertránE.VarelaM.MorenzaJ. L.1985Deposition of Zn3P2 thin films by coevaporationSolar Energy Materials12516
75.SathyamoorthyR.SharmilaC.NatarajanK.VelumaniS.Influence of annealing on structural and optical properties of Zn3P2 thin filmsMater Charact587459
76.MuraliK. R.RaoD. R.1981Optical band gap of [alpha]- Zn3P2Thin Solid Films862836
77.LongJ.1983The Growth of Zn3P2 by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor DepositionJ Electrochem Soc1307258
78.BhushanM. M.CatalanoA.1981Polycrystalline Zn3P2 Schottky barrier solar cellsAppl Phys Lett383941
79.KakishitaK.1994Zinc phosphide epitaxial growth by photo-MOCVDAppl Surf Sci79281
80.CatalanoA.1980Defect dominated conductivity in Zn3P2The Journal of physics and chemistry of solids41635
81.CaseyM. S.FahrenbruchA. L.BubeR. H.1987Properties of zinc‐phosphide junctions and interfacesJournal of Applied Physics6129416
82.BhushanM.TurnerJ. A.ParkinsonB. A.1986Photoelectrochemical Investigation of Zn3P2J Electrochem Soc1335369
83.BhushanM. M.1982Schottky solar cells on thin polycrystalline Zn3P2 filmsAppl Phys Lett4051
84.WyethN. C.CatalanoA.1979Spectral response measurements of minority‐carrier diffusion length in Zn3P2Journal of Applied Physics5014037
85.GintingM. M.LeslieJ.1989Preparation and electrical properties of heterojunctions of ZnO on Zn3P2 and CdTeCan J Phys6744855
86.SudaT.SuzukiM.KuritaS.1983Polycrystalline Zn3P2 Indium-Tin Oxide Solar CellsJpn J Appl Phys22L6568
87.CatalanoA. A.1980Evidence of p/n homojunction formation in Zn3P2Appl Phys Lett37567
89.MisiewiczJ.SzatkowskiJ.MirowskaN.JezierskiK.GumiennyZ.1986Solar energy conversion in metal- Zn3P2 contactsActa Physica PolonicaA6911315
90.CatalanoA. A.1980The growth of large Zn3P2 crystals by vapor transportJ Cryst Growth496816
91.WangFaa-ChingBubeR. H.FeigelsonR. S.RouteR. K.1981Single crystal growth of Zn3P2J Cryst Growth5526872
92.DeissJ. J. L.1988Amorphous thin films of Zn3P2Phys Scripta3758792
93.MuraliK. R.1987Properties of Zn3P2 films grown by close space evaporation. Materials science & engineeringA, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing92193
94.SolimanM.KashyoutA. B.OsmanM.El-GamalM.2005Electrochemical deposition of Zn3P2 thin film semiconductors on tin oxide substratesRenewable Energy30181929
95.NoseY. Y.2012Electrochemical Deposition of Zn3P2 Thin Film Semiconductors Based on Potential-pH Diagram of the Zn-P-H2O SystemJ Electrochem Soc159D181
96.VasekarP. S.AdusumilliS. P.VanhartD.DhakalT.DesuS.2012Development of zinc phosphide as a p-type absorberPhotovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 38th IEEE
97.AdusumilliS. P.VasekarP. S.VanhartD.DhakalT.WestgateC. R.DesuS.2011Development of zinc phosphide as an absorber using chemical reflux techniqueMRS conference proceedings, Spring
98.KimballG. M.MüllerA.LewisN. S.AtwaterH. A.2009Photoluminescence-based measurements of the energy gap and diffusion length of Zn3P2Appl Phys Lett95112103
99.KimballG. M.LewisN. S.AtwaterH. A.2010Mg doping and alloying in Zn3P2 heterojunction solar cells Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 35th IEEE001039-43
100.WilcoxonJ. P.NewcomerP. P.SamaraG. A.1996Strong quantum confinement effects in semiconductors: FeS2 nanoclustersSolid State Commun985815
101.AltermattP. P.KiesewetterT.EllmerK.TributschH.2002Specifying targets of future research in photovoltaic devices containing pyrite (FeS2) by numerical modellingSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells7118195
102.ChatzitheodorouG. G.1986Thin photoactive FeS2 (pyrite) filmsMater Res Bull2114817
104.EnnaouiA.1993Iron disulfide for solar energy conversionSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells29289
105.EnnaouiA.FiechterS.SmestadG.TributschH.1990Preparation of iron disulphide and its use for solar energy conversionProceedings of 1st World Renewable Energy Congress45864
106.DahmanH. H.1996Iron pyrite films prepared by sulfur vapor transportThin Solid Films2805660
107.FiechterS.1992The microstructure and stoichiometry of pyriteJ Mater Res7
108.WadiaC. C.2009Surfactant-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis of Single phase Pyrite FeS NanocrystalsChemistry of materials21256870
109.KunstM.TributschH.1984Surface microwave conductivity spectroscopy. A new experimental toolChemical Physics Letters1051236
110.SmestadG.Da SilvaA.TributschH.FiechterS.KunstM.MezianiN.et al.1989Formation of semiconducting iron pyrite by spray pyrolysisSolar Energy Materials18299313
111.WuR.ZhengY. F.ZhangX. G.SunY. F.XuJ. B.JianJ. K.2004Hydrothermal synthesis and crystal structure of pyriteJ Cryst Growth2665237
112.JooJ. J.2003Generalized and Facile Synthesis of Semiconducting Metal Sulfide NanocrystalsJ Am Chem Soc125111005
113.LinY. Y. Y.2009Extended red light harvesting in a poly(P3-hexylthiophene)/iron disulfide nanocrystal hybrid solar cellNanotechnology20405207
114.BiY. Y.2011Air Stable, Photosensitive, Phase Pure Iron Pyrite Nanocrystal Thin Films for Photovoltaic ApplicationNano letters1149537
115.PuthusseryJ. J.2010Colloidal Iron Pyrite (FeS ) Nanocrystal Inks for Thin-Film PhotovoltaicsJ Am Chem Soc101222110759049
116.GantaL.DhakalT.RajendranS.WestgateC. R.2012Synthesis of FeS2 nanocrystals for ink-based solar cells MRS Online Proceedings Library1447
118.SmestadG.EnnaouiA.FiechterS.TributschH.HofmannW. K.BirkholzM.et al.1990Photoactive thin film semiconducting iron pyrite prepared by sulfurization of iron oxidesSolar Energy Materials2014965
119.AdusumilliS. P.DhakalT.2012Synthesis of Iron Pyrite Film through Low Temperature Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor DepositionMRS conference proceedings, Spring
120.Alonso-VanteN.ChatzitheodorouG.FiechterS.MgodukaN.PouliosI.TributschH.1988Interfacial behavior of hydrogen-treated sulphur deficient pyrite (FeS2−x)Solar Energy Materials18921
121.SchieckR. R.1990Electrical properties of natural and synthetic pyrite (FeS2) crystalsJ Mater Res5156772
122.HallR. R. N.1952Electron-Hole Recombination in GermaniumPhysical review87387
123.ShockleyW. W.1952Statistics of the Recombinations of Holes and ElectronsPhysical review8783542
124.OertelJ.EllmerK.BohneW.RöhrichJ.TributschH.1999Growth of n-type polycrystalline pyrite (FeS2) films by metalorganic chemical vapour deposition and their electrical characterizationJ Cryst Growth198-199Part 2120510
125.EllmerK.TributschH.2000Iron disulphide (pyrite) as photovoltaic material: problems and opportunitiesProceedings of the 12th Workshop on Quantum Solar Energy Conversion
126.AlharbiF.BassJ.SalhiA.AlyamaniA.KimH.MillerR.2011Abundant non-toxic materials for thin film solar cells: Alternative to conventional materialsRenewable Energy361027538
127.Ramakrishna ReddyK. T.Purandhara ReddyP.DattaP. K.MilesR. W.2002Formation of polycrystalline SnS layers by a two-step processThin Solid Films4034041169
128.DevikaM.ReddyN.GunasekharK.2011Structural, electrical, and optical properties of as-grown and heat treated ultra-thin SnS filmsThin Solid Films520162832
129.DevikaM.ReddyN.RameshK.GunasekharK.GopalE.ReddyK. T. R.2006Influence of annealing on physical properties of evaporated SnS filmsSemiconductor science and technology21112531
130.GunasekaranM. M.2007Photovoltaic cells based on pulsed electrochemically deposited SnS and photochemically deposited CdS and Cd1−xZnxSSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells917748
131.AvellanedaD.NairM. T. S.NairP. K.2009Photovoltaic structures using chemically deposited tin sulfide thin filmsThin Solid Films51725002
132.Ramakrishna ReddyK. T.Koteswara ReddyN.MilesR. W.2006Photovoltaic properties of SnS based solar cellsSolar Energy Mater Solar Cells9030416
133.LiL.LiuX.HuangJ.CaoM.ChenS.ShenY.et al.2012Solution-based synthesis and characterization of Cu2FeSnS4 nanocrystalsMater Chem Phys13368891
134.YanC.HuangC.YangJ.LiuF.LiuJ.LaiY.et al.2012Synthesis and characterizations of quaternary Cu2FeSnS4 nanocrystalsChem Commun4826035
135.FernandesP. P. A.2010A study of ternary Cu2SnS3 and Cu3SnS4 thin films prepared by sulfurizing stacked metal precursorsJournal of physics.D, Applied physics43215403
136.LiuG. G.SchulmeyerT.BrötzJ.KleinA.JaegermannW.2003Interface properties and band alignment of Cu2S/CdS thin film solar cellsThin Solid Films43143247782
137.BragagnoloJ. A.BarnettA.PhillipsJ.HallR.RothwarfA.1980The design and fabrication of thin-film CdS/Cu2S cells of 9.15-percent conversion efficiencyIEEE Trans Electron Devices2764551
138.WuY. Y.WadiaC.MaW.SadtlerB.AlivisatosA. P.2008Synthesis and Photovoltaic Application of Copper(I) Sulfide NanocrystalsNano letters825515