Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Curbing Corruption, Bribery, and Money Laundering in Public Procurement Processes: An International Perspective

Written By

Jack Magakwe

Submitted: 23 November 2023 Reviewed: 27 November 2023 Published: 17 July 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004005

From the Edited Volume

Corruption, Bribery, and Money Laundering - Global Issues

Kamil Hakan Dogan

Chapter metrics overview

16 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Corruption, bribery, and money laundering represent some of the most pervasive and damaging global issues facing societies today. Corrupt and illicit activities erode trust in public institutions, hinder economic growth, and fuel organized crime. This chapter will delve into the multifaceted challenges of corruption, bribery, and money laundering globally and explore the various strategies and initiatives to combat them. The chapter reflects on understanding the complexity of corruption, bribery, and money laundering from a global perspective. During the past century, many scholars conducted research focused on anti-corruption measures, but limited attention was devoted to exploring why corruption and money laundering still increase despite the strong legislative and institutional capabilities to curb corrupt practices. This chapter also explores the ability of AI as a tool to curb corruption and minimize the risk factors of corruption in various institutions globally. It was recommended that comprehensive due diligence and risk mitigation practices should be implemented together, engaging in collective action, advocating for policy reforms, and supporting initiatives that strengthen the rule of law to prevent bribery and money laundering.

Keywords

  • corruption
  • public procurement
  • bribery
  • money laundering international cooperation
  • anti-corruption initiative
  • transparency
  • accountability
  • global impact
  • regulatory framework

1. Introduction

Corruption, bribery, and money laundering are pervasive and interconnected global challenges that transcend borders and erode the foundations of trust, integrity, and fairness in both public and private sectors. Corrupt practices and illicit activities have far-reaching consequences, including hindering economic development, undermining democratic institutions to function effectively, and creating a breeding ground for organized crime. In this chapter, we will explore the multifaceted nature of these issues and the strategies employed globally to combat them, drawing on insights from academic books and journals to substantiate our discussion. The literature review conducted by the author of this chapter will explore the negative effects of corruption activities on economic growth and social development on a global scale.

Advertisement

2. Literature review

Corruption, bribery, and money laundering are deeply ingrained problems that plague societies globally, transcending borders and corroding the foundations of trust, integrity, and fairness in both public and private sectors. Corruption on a global scale hurts the economic development of many countries, and the ability of democratic institutions to execute their core mandate [1]. This literature review explores the multifaceted nature of these issues and the strategies employed globally to combat corrupt practices, drawing on insights from academic books and journals to substantiate our discussion.

As defined by the United Nations, corruption refers to the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. It manifests in various forms, such as bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and favoritism [2]. The detrimental effects of corruption on economic development have been extensively studied. A study by [3] found that corruption reduces economic growth and investment, distorts resource allocation, and undermines public trust. Furthermore, it perpetuates poverty and exacerbates income inequality as corrupt officials siphon off resources meant for public welfare. These findings highlight the urgent need to address corruption as a barrier to sustainable development.

Bribery, closely linked to corruption, involves the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of something of value to influence the actions of an individual in a position of power. It is a pervasive problem that undermines fair competition, erodes public trust, and distorts the functioning of markets [4]. Rose-Ackerman [5] argues that bribery not only distorts economic outcomes but also undermines the legitimacy of public institutions, leading to a decline in citizen participation and weakening democratic governance. The detrimental effects of bribery on economic growth and social welfare highlight the importance of robust anti-bribery measures.

Money laundering, often intertwined with corruption and bribery, refers to concealing the origins of illegally obtained money to make it appear legitimate [6]. This enables criminals to enjoy the proceeds of their illicit activities while evading detection and prosecution. Money laundering facilitates organized crime, including drug trafficking, human trafficking, and terrorism. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) estimates that money laundering represents 2–5% of global GDP, amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars annually. These staggering figures underscore the urgent need for effective measures to combat money laundering and disrupt the illicit financial flows that enable organized crime [7].

Based on the above, it can be argued that corrupt practices threaten many nations’ economic development. Governments and international organizations have employed various strategies and initiatives to tackle these interconnected challenges. One such strategy is the adoption and implementation of anti-corruption laws and regulations. Countries worldwide have enacted legislation to criminalize corruption and bribery, with some establishing specialized anti-corruption agencies to investigate and prosecute offenders. However, the effectiveness of these legal measures depends on their enforcement and the political will to combat corruption.

Another approach is the promotion of transparency and accountability. Transparency International, a global civil society organization, advocates for greater transparency in public and private sectors through initiatives such as the Corruption Perceptions Index and the Global Corruption Barometer [8]. These tools measure public perceptions of corruption and provide valuable insights into the prevalence and impact of corruption worldwide. Additionally, implementing open data policies and whistleblower protection mechanisms can enhance transparency and empower individuals to report corruption without fear of reprisal.

International cooperation is also crucial in combating corruption, bribery, and money laundering. The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), adopted in 2003, provides a comprehensive framework for countries to prevent, detect, and prosecute corruption [9]. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) sets international standards and promotes the implementation of measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. These multilateral efforts emphasize the importance of collaboration and information sharing to address these global challenges effectively. In summary, corrupt practices threaten economic development, and governments and international organizations employ strategies such as anti-corruption laws, transparency promotion, and international cooperation to address these challenges.

Advertisement

3. Understanding the complexity of corruption, bribery, and money laundering

Defining and differentiating these three closely related phenomena is essential to comprehend the global fight against corruption, bribery, and money laundering. Corruption refers to the abuse of power for personal gain, while bribery involves offering or receiving something of value to influence an official’s actions [10]. On the other hand, money laundering is disguising the origins of illegally obtained money, making it appear legitimate. Scholarly research highlights the interconnectedness of these crimes. For instance, Rose-Ackerman and Truex [11], in her seminal work “Corruption and Government”, emphasizes that bribery and corruption often facilitate money laundering, creating a vicious cycle of financial misconduct.

August Vollmer, a prominent researcher in the field of policing and police reform, offered a nuanced perspective on the issue of organized crime, suggesting that the root of the problem lies within the legal framework and the criminal justice system. Vollmer’s expertise in addressing various forms of vice, along with his significant contributions to enhancing the efficiency and organization of several police forces, culminated in his seminal work, “The Police and Modern Society, “ published in 1936. In this work, Vollmer articulated the principle that the primary role of the police force is to safeguard society from criminal elements rather than attempting to regulate or control moral behavior. He contended that any alternative approach to policing, which ventured into the realm of moral regulation, was counterproductive and could potentially divert police resources and contribute to the proliferation of crime and corruption within society [12].

Vollmer firmly maintained that conventional law enforcement mechanisms were ill-suited for resolving the complex issues associated with vices such as prostitution, gambling, and drug-related activities. He advocated for a more focused, pragmatic, and objective approach to policing that prioritized the protection of society from criminal activities rather than engaging in moral policing, which he considered a futile and detrimental endeavor [12].

In summary, August Vollmer’s views on organized crime underscored the importance of a law enforcement system that protects society from criminal elements while eschewing attempts to control moral behavior. These ideas, expounded in his work “The Police and Modern Society,” emphasized the potential counterproductivity of diverting law enforcement efforts toward moral regulation and highlighted the need for a more strategic and efficient approach to policing [12].

The consequences of corruption, bribery, and money laundering are profound and widespread. Corruption exerts profound and multifaceted impacts on society, institutions, and economies. Corruption erodes the integrity of institutions and the rule of law, fostering a climate of impunity and mistrust [13]. Economically, it distorts markets by diverting resources from productive sectors and inhibits economic growth. It exacerbates social injustice by siphoning resources meant for public services, hindering equitable access to education, healthcare, and necessities. Corruption undermines the effectiveness of governments, perpetuates poverty, and hampers sustainable development efforts [14]. Moreover, it engenders a loss of public trust in institutions and contributes to political instability. The corrosive effects of corruption are far-reaching, affecting both developed and developing nations, and underscore the urgent need for comprehensive anti-corruption measures and global cooperation to address these pervasive issues.

Corrupt and illicit activities distort economic markets by diverting resources from the production of products [15]. Corruption and bribery undermine fair competition, increase costs, and reduce economic growth prospects. Corruption and bribery represent pernicious and complex challenges with significant economic consequences. In economics, these illicit practices have been recognized as major disruptors of fair competition, drivers of increased costs, and impediments to sustained economic growth. This academic discourse explores the multifaceted and interrelated ways corruption and bribery disrupt economies. Drawing on various scholarly sources, this analysis highlights the far-reaching effects of these corrupt activities and underscores the importance of addressing these issues to foster equitable and prosperous economic environments.

Corruption and bribery strike at the heart of fair competition within economies. When businesses or individuals are compelled to engage in corrupt practices to secure contracts, licenses, or favorable treatment, it distorts the level playing field essential for market dynamics to function effectively. Corruption effectively skews competition by providing an unfair advantage to those willing to pay bribes or engage in corrupt dealings [16].

In essence, this undermines the principles of market efficiency and allocative fairness. Fair competition is the cornerstone of economic systems, as it ensures that the most efficient and innovative firms can thrive, ultimately leading to the optimal allocation of resources [17]. However, this fairness is disrupted when corruption prevails, and economic resources are often misallocated to less efficient and more corrupt actors.

3.1 Escalation of costs

Corruption and bribery contribute to a substantial increase in transaction costs within an economy. Transaction costs include any expenses incurred beyond the actual purchase price of a good or service, such as legal fees, negotiation expenses, or information-gathering efforts [18]. Corruption magnifies these costs by requiring parties to allocate additional resources for under-the-table payments, legal protection, or intermediaries who can facilitate corrupt dealings. This results in a misallocation of valuable economic resources.

Moreover, these transaction costs extend beyond the direct financial burden of corruption. They impose indirect costs on businesses and consumers by erasing trust and introducing uncertainties in business dealings. When bribery and corruption are rife, businesses may divert resources from productive activities to navigate corrupt practices, such as securing permits or licenses through illicit means [3]. This diversion of resources not only escalates costs but also hampers economic productivity and efficiency.

Advertisement

4. Reduction of economic growth prospects

One of the most pernicious consequences of corruption and bribery is the negative impact on economic growth prospects. Extensive scholarly research has consistently demonstrated a strong correlation between corruption and reduced economic growth [19]. A corrupt environment undermines economic development by impeding the efficient allocation of resources, deterring foreign direct investment, and diminishing the attractiveness of a country for businesses and investors.

When businesses perceive that corruption and bribery are pervasive, they are often reluctant to invest in a given market due to concerns about the security of their investments and the potential erosion of profit margins [20]. This hesitancy to invest results in reduced capital inflow and diminished economic growth potential. Furthermore, the misallocation of resources caused by corruption hampers innovation and productivity, hindering a nation’s ability to compete globally [21].

Advertisement

5. Case study: corruption in developing economies

An illustrative example of the economic disruption caused by corruption and bribery can be found in many developing economies. The misallocation of resources, increased costs, and reduced economic growth prospects are particularly pronounced in these contexts. Scholars have observed that developing countries often face more significant challenges in mitigating corruption’s economic impacts [22]. For instance, in some countries, corrupt practices within the public sector can divert funds intended for essential public services, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure development, into the hands of corrupt officials [23]. This exacerbates social inequalities and deprives the nation of the necessary human capital and physical infrastructure investments, which are fundamental drivers of long-term economic growth.

Moreover, businesses in developing economies may be disproportionately burdened by corruption-related transaction costs. The need to pay bribes, navigate bureaucratic hurdles, and secure contracts through corrupt means can severely impact the cost structures of enterprises, making them less competitive in international markets [24].

Advertisement

6. Weakened institutions

Corruption erodes the integrity of institutions, weakening the rule of law and hindering the effective functioning of governments, businesses, and civil society organizations. It disrupts economic growth and weakens institutions to fulfill their mandate, delivering services to their citizens. Corruption’s corrosive effects extend beyond economic disruption, profoundly impacting the very foundations of institutions and the rule of law. This academic discourse delves into the multifaceted ways corruption weakens institutions and erodes their integrity. The resulting weakening of the rule of law and the hindrance it imposes on the effective functioning of governments, businesses, and civil society organizations has far-reaching implications for economic stability and growth. Drawing on various scholarly sources, this analysis underscores the intricate relationship between corruption and institutional fragility.

Corruption is inherently antithetical to the rule of law. It subverts the principles of fairness, accountability, and transparency central to societies’ legal framework. When corruption is prevalent, the rule of law is eroded, as laws and regulations are often bypassed or manipulated for personal gain. This erosion of the rule of law has cascading effects on economic systems. In societies where corruption is rampant, individuals and businesses often operate under a veil of uncertainty, as they cannot rely on the consistent and impartial application of laws and regulations. This uncertainty deters investment and hampers economic growth. Businesses become hesitant to invest in environments where the rule of law is weakened, as they are concerned about their investments’ security and their operations’ predictability [25].

Corruption weakens institutions, erodes the integrity of the rule of law, and hinders the effective functioning of governments, businesses, and civil society organizations. This erosion results in profound economic disruption, discouraging investment, limiting economic growth prospects, and exacerbating social inequalities. Addressing this disruption requires comprehensive measures to strengthen institutions, enhance transparency, and promote accountability. By tackling corruption and resulting institutional weaknesses, societies can create more stable and equitable economic environments conducive to sustained growth and development.

6.1 Social injustice

Corruption perpetuates social inequality by diverting resources meant for public services, such as education and healthcare, into the hands of the corrupt. This exacerbates poverty and reduces access to essential services. Corruption potentiates social inequality, exacerbating poverty and hindering equitable access to essential public services, particularly education and healthcare. This academic discourse delves into the complex and interrelated ways corruption perpetuates social inequality, with profound consequences for economic disruption. Drawing upon a diverse range of scholarly sources, this analysis underscores the far-reaching impact of corruption on resource allocation, poverty, and the accessibility of essential services. By understanding the economic repercussions of corruption, societies can better appreciate the urgency of addressing this pervasive issue and its detrimental effects on human development and economic stability.

6.2 Resource misallocation

Corruption misallocates valuable resources intended for public services, diverting them into the hands of corrupt individuals and entities. Public funds allocated for education and healthcare are siphoned off through illicit means, leaving insufficient resources for developing and maintaining quality public services. These diverted funds result in underfunded schools, poorly equipped healthcare facilities, and inadequate infrastructure [3].

In practical terms, this resource misallocation deepens social inequalities by disproportionately affecting marginalized and vulnerable populations. Quality education and healthcare become the privilege of the few who can afford private alternatives, while the majority, particularly the impoverished, are left with substandard, underfunded public services. Consequently, social inequality is perpetuated, limiting opportunities for upward social mobility [26].

Corruption significantly contributes to the exacerbation of poverty by undermining the effectiveness of anti-poverty programs and policies. When corruption permeates the distribution of resources meant for poverty alleviation, the intended beneficiaries receive fewer or no benefits. Resources earmarked for social safety nets, job creation, and other poverty reduction initiatives are often diverted into the pockets of corrupt officials [27].

This diversion of resources means that the impoverished remain trapped in a cycle of poverty. They are denied the opportunity to break free from the chains of deprivation, as these resources would have provided them with the means to access education, healthcare, and other essential services necessary for personal and economic development. Corruption thus reinforces the social stratification of societies by limiting the ability of the impoverished to escape poverty [19].

6.3 Reduced access to essential services

The impact of corruption on social inequality becomes evident in the reduced access to essential public services, particularly in education and healthcare. Underfunded schools struggle to provide quality education, leading to lower literacy rates and limited opportunities for the disadvantaged. Similarly, healthcare systems burdened by corruption lack resources to provide adequate care, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations [28]. Reduced access to quality education perpetuates disparities in skills and opportunities, limiting the potential for economic advancement among those already marginalized. Furthermore, inadequate access to healthcare leads to increased morbidity and mortality rates among the impoverished, resulting in decreased labour force participation and productivity [29]. These effects collectively hinder economic development and perpetuate social inequality.

Sub-Saharan Africa provides a salient case study illustrating the economic disruption caused by corruption’s role in perpetuating social inequality. In many countries within the region, corruption diverts public resources that could be directed toward education and healthcare into the hands of corrupt officials and elite groups [11]. As a result, the impoverished communities in Sub-Saharan Africa often lack access to quality education and healthcare, perpetuating social inequalities across generations. A lack of quality education limits opportunities for gainful employment, and substandard healthcare services result in high mortality rates and limited life expectancy. These adverse effects are particularly pronounced in the absence of comprehensive anti-corruption measures, exacerbating the poverty levels within these nations [30].

6.4 Addressing economic disruption caused by corruption

Effectively addressing the economic disruption caused by corruption’s perpetuation of social inequality necessitates comprehensive measures to reduce corruption, enhance transparency, and reallocate resources to essential public services. These measures should include:

  • Strengthening anti-corruption laws and institutions to prevent corruption at all levels [31].

  • Enhancing transparency and accountability in resource allocation ensures public funds are channeled into education, healthcare, and other essential services [32].

  • Implementing comprehensive social safety nets and poverty reduction programs that are less susceptible to corruption [33].

Corruption’s role in perpetuating social inequality has significant economic consequences, disrupting equitable resource allocation, exacerbating poverty, and reducing access to essential public services. These impacts hinder economic development, particularly in marginalized communities, and reinforce the cycle of social inequality. Addressing this disruption requires comprehensive efforts to reduce corruption, enhance transparency, and allocate resources to essential public services. By recognizing the economic repercussions of corruption, societies can better appreciate the urgency of addressing this pervasive issue and its detrimental effects on human development and economic stability.

Effectively addressing the economic disruption caused by corruption and bribery necessitates comprehensive measures, including legal and institutional reforms, increased transparency, and robust anti-corruption initiatives [34]. Strengthening the rule of law and enhancing the enforcement of anti-corruption legislation are essential steps in combatting corruption and mitigating its economic impact [35].

Furthermore, promoting transparency in business and government transactions can reduce the prevalence of corrupt practices. Measures such as open contracting, where government contracts and procurement processes are publicly accessible, can significantly diminish the opportunities for bribery and under-the-table deals [36]. Additionally, international cooperation in combating corruption is vital. The enforcement of anti-corruption standards and agreements across borders can help limit opportunities for corruption and reduce its economic impact on a global scale [37].

Corruption and bribery inflict significant economic disruption by undermining fair competition, increasing costs, and reducing economic growth prospects. The consequences are particularly profound in developing economies, where the misallocation of resources and transaction costs severely impact human capital development and business competitiveness. Addressing this disruption requires a multi-pronged approach, including legal reforms, enhanced transparency, and international cooperation. By tackling corruption, societies can foster equitable and prosperous economic environments conducive to sustained growth and development.

6.5 Restoring loss of trust

Public trust in institutions declines as a result of corruption. Citizens become disillusioned with governments and lose faith in the ability of institutions to serve their best interests. Corruption profoundly affects society, extending far beyond the immediate financial cost. One of its most pernicious consequences is the erosion of public trust in institutions, particularly governments. When citizens perceive that corruption is prevalent and that public resources are being misappropriated for personal gain, they lose faith in the integrity of institutions. This loss of trust has profound implications for economic stability, as it can result in social unrest, political instability, and an overall reluctance to engage in economic activities. This academic discourse explores the intricate relationship between corruption and the erosion of public trust in institutions, shedding light on the far-reaching economic disruption that ensues. Drawing upon various scholarly sources, this analysis underscores the complex dynamics that connect corruption, institutional trust, and economic consequences.

Corruption fundamentally erodes public trust in institutions. Trust is a cornerstone of societal stability, as it underpins the functioning of governments, businesses, and civil society organizations. Citizens rely on institutions to provide essential services, maintain the rule of law, and protect their interests. When corruption is perceived to be rampant within these institutions, the trust that citizens place in them is severely compromised [38].

As citizens observe bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and other corrupt practices within the government, their faith in the institution responsible for upholding the social contract weakens. This trust deficit extends to other areas of society, including the private sector, where businesses may be seen as complicit or victims of corrupt practices. As trust diminishes, so does citizens’ willingness to engage in economic activities that require institutional support and stability [39].

The erosion of public trust in institutions has profound economic implications. Trust is pivotal in fostering investment, economic growth, and development. When citizens lack trust in the institutions responsible for maintaining economic stability and enforcing the rule of law, they become reluctant to invest in their businesses, start new ventures, or even participate in formal financial systems. This hesitance results in a contraction of economic activity [40].

Furthermore, the loss of trust can lead to political instability and social unrest. When citizens perceive that their institutions are riddled with corruption and unable to serve their best interests, they may resort to protests, strikes, or even uprisings. These disruptions to social and political stability have direct economic costs, including reduced foreign direct investment, a flight of capital, and damage to the business environment [41].

Advertisement

7. Deterioration of governance

The erosion of trust in institutions due to corruption can result in a deterioration of governance. Political leaders may struggle to implement effective policies and reforms in countries where citizens lose faith in their governments. A lack of trust can lead to governance inefficiencies as citizens become less cooperative and more resistant to taxation and government directives [42].

Governance inefficiencies, in turn, hinder economic development. Investment in critical infrastructure, education, and healthcare may be delayed or inadequate, impacting the long-term economic prospects of a nation. In this context, the erosion of trust in institutions becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, as deteriorating governance further erodes trust, perpetuating a cycle of economic disruption and instability [43].

A compelling case study illustrating the economic disruption caused by the erosion of institutional trust due to corruption can be found in post-Soviet states. In the years following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, many of these countries grappled with widespread corruption and the consequent erosion of public trust in their newly established governments. In these contexts, citizens observed high levels of corruption in public administration, leading to a loss of trust in government institutions. This loss of trust had profound economic consequences, as it discouraged foreign investment and hindered economic growth [44]. The rule of law was compromised, and businesses were often forced to navigate complex and corrupt bureaucratic hurdles, escalating transaction costs and discouraging entrepreneurship [45]. Consequently, these post-Soviet states faced ongoing economic challenges due to the erosion of institutional trust driven by corruption.

Advertisement

8. The global magnitude of the problem

The extent of these issues on a global scale is staggering. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), illicit financial flows, primarily driven by money laundering, account for an estimated 2.7% of global GDP (UNODC, 2020). Academic literature, such as the study by S [46] in the “Journal of Financial Crime,” underscores the devastating impact of money laundering on economic stability and sustainable development [47].

Understanding the root causes of corruption is crucial for effective prevention and mitigation efforts. As noted by Gupta et al. [19] in “Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty?” published in the Economics of Governance journal, corruption often thrives in environments characterized by weak governance, lack of transparency, and high poverty levels. This insight underscores the importance of addressing systemic issues to combat corruption effectively.

Advertisement

9. Recommendations

The increase in corrupt cases in public procurement is an area of concern on a global scale. This chapter reports on the recommendations to address the challenges of corruption, bribery, and money laundering.

9.1 Legal and regulatory frameworks

One of the key pillars in the fight against corruption, bribery, and money laundering is the establishment of robust legal and regulatory frameworks. International agreements such as the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) are blueprints for anti-corruption efforts. Literature by Klitgaard [48] in “Controlling Corruption” argues that effective legal frameworks can deter corrupt behavior and encourage transparency [49].

International Cooperation and Anti-Corruption Initiatives are necessary to combat corruption. The global nature of these crimes necessitates international cooperation. Organizations like INTERPOL and the World Bank are pivotal in facilitating collaborative efforts. Academic research, such as the study by Klitgaard [50] in “The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform,” underscores the significance of these international initiatives in the fight against corruption.

Furthermore, technology plays a role in providing solutions to corrupt practices. Advancements in technology have transformed the landscape of anti-corruption efforts. Academic works like Doig [51] article in “Government Information Quarterly” highlight how data analytics and digital tools are being used to detect and prevent corruption. However, ethical considerations and potential misuse of technology are also areas of concern that must be addressed [52].

Corruption, a pervasive issue affecting societies worldwide, not only undermines the integrity of institutions but also inflicts substantial economic disruption. To effectively combat this menace, harnessing the power of artificial intelligence (AI) and technology has emerged as a promising approach. This academic discourse explores the multifaceted ways in which AI and technology can be leveraged to combat corruption, subsequently mitigating its economic repercussions. Drawing upon a range of scholarly sources, this analysis underscores the transformative potential of AI and technology in reducing corruption and fostering economic stability.

9.2 Enhancing transparency and accountability

AI and technology are pivotal in enhancing transparency and accountability within governmental and organizational processes. Through implementing e-government systems and digital platforms, such as open data initiatives, governments can provide citizens with access to real-time information on budgets, procurement, and public services. This transparency reduces the opacity within governmental operations, making it more difficult for corrupt practices to thrive [53].

By offering insights into how public resources are allocated and utilized, technology empowers citizens, civil society organizations, and the media to monitor government activities and detect irregularities or corruption. This increased transparency promotes greater accountability, as corrupt officials are more likely to be exposed and held responsible for their actions. In this way, technology can serve as a powerful tool in reducing corruption and fostering economic stability.

AI and technology can significantly bolster anti-corruption efforts by automating the monitoring and enforcement of anti-corruption measures. For example, AI-driven algorithms can analyze vast datasets and detect patterns associated with corrupt practices, such as procurement fraud, embezzlement, or kickbacks [54]. Such systems enable authorities to identify suspicious activities and investigate them promptly and proactively.

Moreover, the implementation of blockchain technology has gained traction in anti-corruption efforts [55]. Blockchain provides a decentralized and tamper-proof ledger system that can track financial transactions and public procurement processes, reducing the risk of corruption and ensuring transparency [56]. These advanced technologies offer law enforcement agencies and anti-corruption bodies powerful tools for monitoring and combating corrupt activities.

9.3 Facilitating whistleblowing and reporting

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and technology have transformed the landscape for reporting corruption and protecting whistleblowers. Digital platforms, mobile apps, and secure online reporting systems allow individuals to report corrupt practices anonymously [57]. The anonymity these technologies offer encourages individuals with information about corruption to come forward, reducing the fear of retaliation.

Furthermore, AI-powered chatbots and natural language processing algorithms can facilitate the initial reporting stages by engaging with whistleblowers, collecting relevant information, and directing reports to the appropriate authorities [58]. These innovations streamline the reporting process and ensure that corruption cases are promptly addressed. Using AI and technology can potentially reduce the economic disruption caused by corruption. According to a study by the World Economic Forum, corruption can reduce a country’s economic growth rate by up to 1% per year [59]. This reduction in economic growth can negatively impact businesses and individuals, ultimately leading to decreased job opportunities and lower living standards. The use of AI and technology, however, can help combat corruption by increasing transparency and efficiency in government systems, detecting and preventing fraudulent activities, and enhancing accountability. One way AI and technology can reduce economic disruption caused by corruption is by increasing transparency in government systems. Transparency is crucial in fighting corruption, as it allows citizens and businesses to monitor the actions of public officials and hold them accountable. With the advancements in AI, governments can implement systems that provide real-time data on financial transactions, budget allocations, and public procurement processes. This makes it harder for corrupt officials to manipulate funds or engage in illicit activities unnoticed.

Furthermore, AI can assist in detecting and preventing fraudulent activities. Machine learning algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data and identify patterns that indicate potential corruption or fraudulent behavior [60]. For example, AI can flag suspicious transactions or discrepancies in financial records, facilitating the early detection of corruption. By utilizing AI in auditing processes, governments and organizations can reduce the likelihood of fraud and corruption, leading to a more stable and trustworthy economic environment.

Additionally, technology can enhance accountability in both private and public sectors. With the development of blockchain technology, for instance, transactions can be recorded in a decentralized and immutable manner. This eliminates the possibility of altering records and creates a transparent and traceable audit trail. By implementing blockchain-based systems, governments can ensure the integrity of public financial records, making it harder for corrupt individuals to exploit loopholes in the system.

Moreover, AI can be utilized to promote citizen engagement and participation in the fight against corruption [61]. Through technology, governments can gather public opinions, concerns, and evidence related to corruption. This can be done through online platforms, mobile applications, or social media monitoring. Utilizing sentiment analysis, AI can analyze the collected data and identify areas of concern or potential corruption hotspots. By involving citizens in the fight against corruption, governments can establish a sense of collective responsibility and reduce the tolerance for corrupt practices. However, it is important to acknowledge that using AI and technology alone is not a panacea for corruption. While these tools can provide valuable assistance, they should be implemented alongside other anti-corruption measures, such as comprehensive legislation, effective law enforcement, and a strong judiciary system.

Additionally, the ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI need to be addressed to ensure that it is used in a manner that upholds human rights and does not exacerbate existing inequalities. The use of AI and technology has the potential to reduce the economic disruption caused by corruption significantly. Governments can create a more resilient and corruption-resistant economic environment by increasing transparency, detecting and preventing fraudulent activities, enhancing accountability, and promoting citizen engagement. However, it is essential to recognize that these tools are not a standalone solution and a comprehensive approach to fighting corruption is necessary for long-term success.

Technology, particularly AI, can significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of auditing and monitoring processes. AI-based auditing tools can analyze vast amounts of financial data in real-time, identifying irregularities, anomalies, and potential fraud indicators [62]. This automation not only accelerates the auditing process but also enhances its accuracy. In public procurement, technology can automate the monitoring of procurement processes, flagging deviations from established procedures or pricing irregularities. By reducing the manual workload and introducing AI-driven systems, organizations can minimize opportunities for corrupt practices, thereby mitigating economic disruption [63].

9.4 Promoting digital payment systems

The transition to digital payment systems has the potential to reduce corruption by minimizing opportunities for bribery and embezzlement. Digital payments, such as mobile money and e-wallets, have gained prominence in various regions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries [64]. These systems offer transparency and traceability, making it difficult for corrupt actors to manipulate financial transactions. Furthermore, adopting digital payment systems in public services, such as social welfare disbursements, can reduce the likelihood of funds being siphoned off by intermediaries. These digital solutions are convenient and instrumental in reducing corruption’s economic impact.

Besides promoting digital payment systems, technology, and AI offer significant promise in combating corruption, but they also introduce new challenges related to cybersecurity. As the reliance on digital systems and databases grows, so does the potential for cyberattacks and data breaches [21]. Corrupt actors may attempt to compromise these systems to conceal their activities or manipulate information. Therefore, robust cybersecurity measures must be implemented to protect the integrity of AI and technology-driven anti-corruption efforts. This includes encryption, secure data storage, and continuous monitoring for potential vulnerabilities.

AI and technology offer powerful mechanisms for combatting corruption and mitigating economic disruption. These tools enhance transparency and accountability, strengthen anti-corruption measures, facilitate reporting, automate auditing and monitoring, promote digital payment systems, and address cybersecurity risks. By harnessing the potential of technology and AI, societies can transform their approach to combating corruption, fostering economic stability, and reducing the social inequalities perpetuated by corrupt practices.

Corruption, a pervasive issue with profound economic repercussions, poses a significant challenge to governments, businesses, and societies worldwide. However, in recent years, the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced technology has provided powerful tools for combatting corruption and mitigating economic disruption. This academic discourse delves into the multifaceted ways in which AI and technology can be harnessed to address corruption’s far-reaching economic consequences. Drawing upon a range of scholarly sources, this analysis underscores the transformative potential of AI and technology in reducing corruption and fostering economic stability.

9.5 Enhancing transparency and accountability

AI and technology enhance transparency and accountability within governmental and organizational processes. By implementing e-government systems, digital platforms, and open data initiatives, governments can give citizens real-time access to information on budgets, procurement, and public services [65]. This transparency reduces the opacity within governmental operations, making it more challenging for corrupt practices to thrive. By offering insights into how public resources are allocated and utilized, technology empowers citizens, civil society organizations, and the media to monitor government activities and detect irregularities or corruption. This increased transparency promotes greater accountability, as corrupt officials are more likely to be exposed and held responsible for their actions. In this way, technology can serve as a powerful tool in reducing corruption and fostering economic stability.

9.6 Strengthening anti-corruption measures

AI and technology are pivotal in bolstering anti-corruption efforts by automating the monitoring and enforcement of anti-corruption measures. AI-driven algorithms can analyze vast datasets and detect patterns associated with corrupt practices, such as procurement fraud, embezzlement, or kickbacks [54]. These systems enable authorities to identify suspicious activities and investigate them promptly and proactively.

Moreover, the implementation of blockchain technology has gained traction in anti-corruption efforts. Blockchain provides a decentralized and tamper-proof ledger system that can track financial transactions and public procurement processes, reducing the risk of corruption and ensuring transparency [66]. These advanced technologies offer law enforcement agencies and anti-corruption bodies powerful tools for monitoring and combating corrupt activities. AI and technology have transformed the landscape for reporting corruption and protecting whistleblowers. Digital platforms, mobile apps, and secure online reporting systems allow individuals to report corrupt practices anonymously [67]. The anonymity these technologies offer encourages individuals with information about corruption to come forward, reducing the fear of retaliation.

Furthermore, AI-powered chatbots and natural language processing algorithms can facilitate the initial reporting stages by engaging with whistleblowers, collecting relevant information, and directing reports to the appropriate authorities [54]. These innovations streamline the reporting process and ensure that corruption cases are promptly addressed.

Technology, particularly AI, can significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of auditing and monitoring processes. AI-based auditing tools can analyze vast amounts of financial data in real-time, identifying irregularities, anomalies, and potential fraud indicators [68]. In public procurement, technology can automate the monitoring of procurement processes, flagging deviations from established procedures or pricing irregularities. By reducing the manual workload and introducing AI-driven systems, organizations can minimize opportunities for corrupt practices, thereby mitigating economic disruption [69].

The transition to digital payment systems has the potential to reduce corruption by minimizing opportunities for bribery and embezzlement. Digital payments, such as mobile money and e-wallets, have gained prominence in various regions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries [70]. These systems offer transparency and traceability, making it difficult for corrupt actors to manipulate financial transactions. Furthermore, adopting digital payment systems in public services, such as social welfare disbursements, can reduce the likelihood of funds being siphoned off by intermediaries. These digital solutions are convenient and instrumental in reducing corruption’s economic impact.

9.7 Addressing cybersecurity risks and enforcement of corporate responsibilities

While technology and AI offer significant promise in combating corruption, they also introduce new challenges related to cybersecurity. As the reliance on digital systems and databases grows, so does the potential for cyberattacks and data breaches [71]. Corrupt actors may attempt to compromise these systems to conceal their activities or manipulate information. Therefore, robust cybersecurity measures must be implemented to protect the integrity of AI and technology-driven anti-corruption efforts. This includes encryption, secure data storage, and continuous monitoring for potential vulnerabilities.

AI and technology offer powerful mechanisms for combatting corruption and mitigating its economic disruption. These tools enhance transparency and accountability, strengthen anti-corruption measures, facilitate reporting, automate auditing and monitoring, promote digital payment systems, and address cybersecurity risks. By harnessing the potential of technology and AI, societies can transform their approach to combating corruption, fostering economic stability, and reducing the social inequalities perpetuated by corrupt practices.

Corporations play a significant role in preventing bribery and money laundering. Academic literature, including studies by Mauro [3] in “Corruption and Growth” and Argandona [72] in “Corruption and Companies: The Use of Facilitation Payments,” underscores the importance of corporate governance, due diligence, and compliance programs in mitigating these risks. Corporations play a pivotal role in the fight against corruption as potential culprits and crucial allies. The economic disruption caused by corruption, particularly bribery and money laundering, is a complex and far-reaching issue that substantially affects economies and societies. This academic discourse explores the multifaceted ways in which corporations can contribute to the prevention of bribery and money laundering and, in doing so, mitigate the economic repercussions of these corrupt practices. Drawing upon various scholarly sources, this analysis emphasizes the importance of corporate responsibility and engagement in promoting transparency and ethical business conduct.

Corporations are not passive observers of corruption; they can be both facilitators and victims. In pursuit of profit and market access, some corporations may resort to unethical practices, including bribery, to gain a competitive edge or evade regulatory scrutiny [73]. These corrupt actions, when discovered, have legal and reputational consequences that disrupt economic stability.

At the same time, corporations can also become victims of corruption when navigating business environments tainted by corrupt practices. Bribes, extortion, and money laundering can undermine the rule of law, creating uncertainties in contracts, dispute resolution, and regulatory compliance [74] Consequently, the economic disruption caused by corruption extends to businesses, affecting their investments, profitability, and growth potential.

9.8 Regulatory frameworks and compliance

One of the key mechanisms through which corporations can combat bribery and money laundering is by adhering to stringent regulatory frameworks. Many countries have enacted anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the UK Bribery Act, which have extraterritorial reach and can hold corporations accountable for their actions abroad [75]. To ensure compliance with these laws, corporations must establish effective internal controls, conduct due diligence on business partners, and implement anti-corruption and anti-money laundering programs. Failure to do so exposes the corporation to legal penalties, undermines its ethical standing, and erodes the public’s trust [76]. Thus, adherence to regulatory frameworks is not just a legal necessity but a crucial aspect of corporate responsibility.

Relating to due diligence and risk mitigation, corporations can use comprehensive due diligence and risk mitigation practices to prevent bribery and money laundering. Conducting due diligence on business partners, suppliers, and customers is essential for identifying potential red flags, such as connections to politically exposed persons or entities operating in high-risk jurisdictions [77]. By implementing stringent Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) processes, corporations can reduce their exposure to risks associated with money laundering and illicit financial flows. These practices protect corporations from legal repercussions and safeguard their reputation and financial stability.

To illustrate the above, a compelling case study that illustrates the role of corporate responsibility in preventing corruption, including bribery and money laundering, can be found in the extractive industry. This sector is particularly susceptible to corruption due to valuable natural resources and complex supply chains. Many large extractive companies have adopted comprehensive anti-corruption and anti-money laundering programs in response to these challenges. These programs include strict due diligence processes for their business partners and suppliers, internal reporting mechanisms, and rigorous transparency initiatives [78]. By embracing corporate responsibility in this way, extractive corporations reduce the economic disruption caused by corruption. They promote ethical business practices, safeguard their reputation, and contribute to the economic stability of the countries where they operate.

9.9 Addressing systemic issues

While corporate responsibility is crucial, it is also important to acknowledge that systemic issues, such as weak governance and regulatory gaps, contribute to corruption. Corporations can address these issues by engaging in collective action, advocating for policy reforms, and supporting initiatives that strengthen the rule of law [79]. By collaborating with governments, civil society, and international organizations, corporations can foster an environment less conducive to corruption, thus promoting economic stability and growth.

Corruption is a scourge that undermines societies across the globe, impeding economic growth, eroding public trust, and perpetuating inequality [80]. While corporate responsibility is critical in combating corruption, it is imperative to recognize that systemic issues, such as weak governance and regulatory gaps, significantly contribute to this widespread problem. This essay delves into the interplay between corporate responsibility and systemic issues, emphasizing the importance of addressing these deeper-rooted problems in the fight against corruption.

Weak governance stands as a primary systemic issue promoting corruption. When state institutions lack transparency, accountability, and efficiency, corrupt practices often thrive. Private entities exploit loopholes, bribe officials, and engage in fraudulent activities in these settings. The absence of robust checks and balances fosters an environment wherein corruption becomes a norm rather than an exception. Therefore, while corporations must act responsibly, combating corruption necessitates overhauling governance structures to plug the systemic gaps fueling corrupt practices.

Another critical systemic issue contributing to corruption is regulatory gaps. Inadequate legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms create fertile ground for illicit activities. Insufficient regulations fail to deter corrupt practices, enabling corporations and individuals to manipulate the system for personal gain. Furthermore, incomplete or ineffective regulatory bodies struggle to monitor and punish wrongdoings adequately. Consequently, corporate responsibility must coincide with efforts to identify and rectify regulatory gaps at national and international levels, promoting a comprehensive approach to eradicate corruption.

While systemic issues undoubtedly contribute to corruption, corporate responsibility remains essential to the fight against corruption. Responsible corporate practices can deter corruption by fostering transparency, promoting ethical behavior, and implementing robust internal controls. By adhering to strict ethical standards, businesses can set an example, creating a ripple effect that encourages other players within the ecosystem to follow suit. However, it is essential to recognize that corporate responsibility alone cannot adequately address corruption without simultaneous efforts to address its systemic underpinnings.

Addressing the systemic issues that fuel corruption is imperative to combat it effectively. Strengthening governance structures through transparency, accountability, and the rule of law is paramount [81]. Governments must prioritize institutional reforms that enhance public sector accountability, streamline bureaucratic processes, and establish independent oversight mechanisms. Simultaneously, efforts to close regulatory gaps must be intensified. This requires enacting comprehensive legislation, empowering regulatory bodies, and strengthening international cooperation to combat corruption on a global scale.

In combating corruption, corporate responsibility serves as a vital component, instilling ethical practices within businesses and public institutions. Nonetheless, to truly eradicate corruption, it is essential to address the underlying systemic issues, namely weak governance and regulatory gaps. A comprehensive approach that combines responsible corporate practices with governance reforms and robust regulations can create an environment where corruption becomes increasingly untenable, fostering social and economic development while safeguarding public trust. Through collective action, we can only pave the way toward a more transparent and corruption-free world.

It is clear that corporations must play a significant role in preventing bribery and money laundering, two forms of corruption that inflict severe economic disruption. Through compliance with regulatory frameworks, transparency, due diligence, and internal whistleblowing mechanisms, corporations can actively contribute to the fight against corruption. By embracing corporate responsibility, they protect themselves from legal liabilities and reputational damage and promote ethical business conduct conducive to economic stability and growth.

9.10 The human element

Understanding the psychology behind corruption and bribery is essential. Research by Banfield [82] in “The Moral Basis of a Backward Society” highlights the cultural and societal factors that can normalize corrupt practices. Encouraging whistleblowing and ensuring whistleblower protection, as discussed by [83] in “Blowing the Whistle on Data: Is It Safe?” are vital steps in addressing these behaviors.

The chapter discusses how Italian organized crime groups infiltrate public procurement in Southern Italy, using techniques such as manipulating calls for tender, predetermining tenders, and intimidation to restrict competition. These methods often involve bribery, with mafia groups paying off officials, political sponsors, professionals, and experts to help them win tenders. Additionally, the paper suggests that these techniques can also be used for money laundering, with the cost of bribes often being recovered through savings on the quality of material used in public works. This paper discusses the strategies and techniques used by Italian organized crime to infiltrate public procurement in Southern Italy. It analyzed 18 judicial cases and identified different stages of public contracts vulnerable to criminal infiltration. The stages include the planning and design phase, the tender phase, and the execution of the contract. The paper suggests that organized crime can influence these stages through corruption, bribery, and process manipulation. It also highlights the interaction between the legal economy and mafia entrepreneurship, creating “gray areas” that are effective for criminal infiltration. The paper concludes by suggesting crime-proofing legislation as a preventive strategy [84].

The human element in corrupt practices and its impact on economic development cannot be ignored. Corruption is inherently intertwined with the human element, as it often involves individuals in positions of power and authority who engage in dishonest and unethical practices for personal gain. This academic discourse delves into the multifaceted ways the human element contributes to corrupt practices and, in turn, inflicts economic disruption. Drawing upon a range of scholarly sources, this analysis highlights the role of individuals and the human factor in perpetuating corruption and the far-reaching economic consequences that result from these actions.

The role of individuals in the implementation of anti-corruption measures cannot be ignored Corruption is fundamentally human behavior involving individuals who abuse their entrusted authority or engage in deceptive practices for personal enrichment [85]. Individuals in positions of power, whether in government, business, or other organizations, often can manipulate processes, influence decisions, and exploit their authority. The corrupt actions of these individuals include bribery, embezzlement, extortion, and nepotism, among others [5]. These individuals may engage in corrupt practices for various reasons, including financial gain, pursuing personal interests, and the desire to maintain power and control [31]. The human element is central to understanding the motivations and actions behind corrupt practices.

The human element in corrupt practices profoundly affects resource allocation, as corrupt individuals divert public funds and resources away from their intended purposes. This misallocation of resources has severe economic repercussions, as funds that should be directed toward public services, infrastructure development, and social welfare programs are redirected into the pockets of corrupt actors [86]. In this process, the human element plays a critical role, as corrupt individuals make decisions to prioritize their interests over the well-being of society [87]. As a result, essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure suffer from chronic underfunding and a lack of investment, perpetuating social inequalities and hindering economic development.

A compelling case study that exemplifies the economic disruption caused by the human element in corruption can be found in the context of corrupt political leadership. The economic consequences can be severe when leaders exploit their authority for personal gain. In some countries, political leaders engage in embezzlement, bribery, and misallocating public resources to amass personal wealth [88]. These corrupt practices often result in budgetary shortfalls for essential public services, leading to inadequate healthcare, education, and infrastructure development. The human element, represented by corrupt political leaders, perpetuates social inequality and economic disruption in these nations.

Effectively addressing the human element in corrupt practices necessitates multifaceted measures focusing on prevention, deterrence, and accountability. Some key strategies include:

  • Strengthening anti-corruption laws and institutions to hold corrupt individuals accountable [31].

  • Fostering a culture of ethical behavior and integrity within organizations and institutions through training and awareness campaigns [89].

  • Implementing comprehensive anti-corruption strategies that focus on prevention and enforcement, targeting the root causes of corruption [76].

The human element plays a central role in corrupt practices, as individuals in positions of authority and power engage in unethical behaviors for personal gain [90]. The economic disruption resulting from corruption is multifaceted, including resource misallocation, the erosion of trust, and the perpetuation of social inequality. Addressing the human element in corruption requires a comprehensive approach focusing on prevention, deterrence, and accountability. By combatting corruption at its core, societies can mitigate its economic repercussions and foster more equitable and stable economies.

Advertisement

10. Role of policing combating Corruption

The practice of policing, characterized by providing security through physical constraint, is currently undergoing a profound and unprecedented transformation. Historically, for many centuries, the responsibility of policing has been a central function of government, executed primarily through state police forces. However, there has been a discernible shift in recent times. A diverse array of public and private agencies has become increasingly involved in ensuring public safety. Local authorities and non-governmental organizations have assumed more significant roles in citizen security [91]. Moreover, there has been a notable surge in transnational cooperation among law enforcement agencies to combat transnational criminal activities.

These ongoing developments in policing are exerting considerable pressure on the traditional state police apparatus, impeding its ability to fulfill its security mandate effectively. Consequently, state police agencies are grappling with a crisis of legitimacy, which has been the subject of scholarly scrutiny [92]. It is worth noting, however, that many of these state police agencies have recognized these challenges early. In various nations, including Italy, police forces actively strive to restore public support and, by extension, enhance their legitimacy. To this end, they implement strategies explicitly designed to cultivate trust in their institutions.

11. Conclusion

Corruption, bribery, and money laundering are formidable global challenges that demand a concerted effort from governments, organizations, and individuals. The insights from academic books and journals underscore the complexity of these issues and the importance of multifaceted approaches. As we navigate this global arena, a commitment to transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct remains paramount in our collective endeavor to combat these illicit activities and promote a more just and equitable world. Addressing corruption, bribery, and money laundering globally requires a multi-pronged approach that includes legal reforms, international cooperation, technological advancements, and a commitment to ethical conduct. As societies become increasingly interconnected, the fight against these crimes must evolve, adapt, and strengthen to protect institutions’ integrity and promote a fair and just global economy.

References

  1. 1. Mbaku JM. Corruption and economic development. In: African Economic Development. San Diego: Academic Press, Emerald Publishing Limited; 2019. pp. 331-345
  2. 2. United Nations. Definition of basic concepts and terminologies in governance and public administration. E/C [Internet]. 2006;20194(January):15. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Definition+of+basic+concepts+and+terminologies+in+governance+and+public+administration#1%5Cnhttp://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan022332.pdf
  3. 3. Mauro P. Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995;110(3):681-712
  4. 4. Okeyim MO, Ejue JB, Ekanem SA. Governance and Corruption in Nigeria: A philo-psychological analysis. Net Journal of Social Sciences. 2013;1(2):24-32
  5. 5. Rose-Ackerman S. Corruption: Greed, culture, and the state. Mimeo [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1648859
  6. 6. Zali M, Maulidi A. Fighting against money laundering. BRICS Law Journal. 2018;5(3):40-63
  7. 7. Taylor JDD, Raga K. A comparative analysis of the implementation of anti-corruption legislation by anti-corruption agencies in the provinces of the Eastern and Northern Cape. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa. 2014;10(1):219-240
  8. 8. Hessami Z. Political corruption, public procurement, and budget composition: Theory and evidence from OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy. 2014;34:372-389
  9. 9. Weilert AK. United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)–After Ten Years of Being in Force. Max Planck Yearb United Nations Law Online. 2016;19(1):216-240
  10. 10. Bashir S, Lockheed M, Ninan E, Tan JP. Facing forward: Schooling for learning in Africa. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2018. Available from: https://books.google.co.za/books?id=9gZxDwAAQBAJ
  11. 11. Rose-Ackerman S, Truex R. Corruption and Policy Reform (February 17, 2012). Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 444. 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2007152. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2007152 . Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2007152
  12. 12. Vollmer A, Wilson JQ. The Police and Modern Society. USA: University of California Press Berkeley; 1936. Available from: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/police-and-modern-society
  13. 13. Chidi EN, Ukorah CP, Ifeoma CN, Ifeoma PU. Social injustice and the threat of insurgency in Nigeria: An evaluation. International Journal of Social Science and Management Studies. 28 Oct 2023;2(4):1-13
  14. 14. Kisten M, Maharaj B. Betraying the struggle. Glob Poverty Rethink Causality. 2022;225:230
  15. 15. Siddiqui KA. Corruption and economic mismanagement in developing countries. World Financial Review. Jan 2019;1(1). Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=Corruption+and+economic+mismanagement+in+developing+countries&as_occt=title&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C31
  16. 16. Shleifer A, Vishny RW. Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1993;108(3):599-617. Available from: http://ezproxy.library.capella.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9311301643&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  17. 17. Kleiner V. Corruption in Russia, Russia corrupted is there a way out. Social Sciences. 2015;46(1):3-20
  18. 18. Spiller P, Tomassi M. The institutional foundations of public policy in Argentina. In: Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2010. p. 26. Available from: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1537592708082273
  19. 19. Gupta S, Davoodi H, Alonso-Terme R. Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance. 2002;3:23-45
  20. 20. Weiss TG. Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly. 2000;21(5):795-814
  21. 21. Gupta S, Davoodi HR, Tiongson E. Corruption and the Provision of Health Care and Education Services. The Journal of Government Financial Management. 2000;5(2)
  22. 22. Mauro P. Why worry about corruption. Economic Issues. 1997;6:1-13
  23. 23. Aidt T, Dutta J, Sena V. Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2008;36(2):195-220
  24. 24. Hellman JS, Jones G, Kaufmann D. Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2003;31:751-773
  25. 25. Fisman R, Svensson J. Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics. 2007;83(1):63-75
  26. 26. Duflo E. Women’s empowerment and economic development. Omran For social sciences. 2013;2(5):51-76. DOI: 10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
  27. 27. Djankov S, Ghossein TM, Islam A, Saliola F. Public Procurement Regulation and Road Quality. Washington DC: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper; 6 Nov 2017;(8234)
  28. 28. Rose R, Peiffer C, Rose R, Peiffer C. The impact of corruption on citizens. In: Bad Governance and Corruption. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. pp. 127-144 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92846-3_7
  29. 29. Duvanova D. Economic regulations, red tape, and bureaucratic corruption in post-communist economies. World Development. 2014;59:298-312
  30. 30. Gyimah-Brempong K. Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa. Economics of Governance. 2002;3:183-209
  31. 31. Bardhan P. Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature. 1997;35(3):1320-1346
  32. 32. Bauhr M, Grimes M. Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance. 2014;27(2):291-320
  33. 33. Devereux S. Social protection for enhanced food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy. 2016;60:52-62
  34. 34. Lambsdorff JG. The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theory, Evidence and Policy. Washington DC: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/economics/economic-development-and-growth/institutional-economics-corruption-and-reform-theory-evidence-and-policy?format=HB&isbn=9780521872751
  35. 35. Treisman D. The causes of Corruption: A cross-National Study. Journal of Public Economics. 2000;76(3):399-457
  36. 36. Dreher A, Gassebner M. Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice. 2013;155:3-4
  37. 37. Rose-Ackerman S, Søreide T. International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, Volume Two. Camberley Surrey, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2011
  38. 38. Rothstein B. Controlling Corruption: The Social Contract Approach. USA: Oxford University Press; 2021
  39. 39. Knack S, Biletska N, Kacker K. Deterring kickbacks and encouraging entry in public procurement markets: Evidence from firm surveys in 90 developing countries. World Bank Economic Review. 2019;33(2):287-309
  40. 40. Fukuyama F. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York, USA: Simon and Schuster Inc.; 1996
  41. 41. Przeworski A. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000
  42. 42. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization. 1999;15(1):222-279
  43. 43. Seligson MA. The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: Survey evidence from Latin America. World Development. 2006;34(2):381-404
  44. 44. Kaufmann D, Kaliberda A. Integrating the unofficial economy into the dynamics of post-socialist economies: A framework of analysis and evidence. In: The International Politics of Eurasia: V. 8: Economic Transition in Russia and the New States of Eurasia. Routledge; 17 Sep 2016. pp. 81-120
  45. 45. Estrin S, Prevezer M. The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management. 2011;28:41-67
  46. 46. Fleeson W, Jayawickreme E, Jones ABAP, Brown NA, Serfass DG, Sherman RA, et al. No {title}. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2017;1(1):1188-1197. Available from: https://osf.io/nf5me%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012%0Ahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373546%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.011%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011%0Ahttp://programme.exo
  47. 47. Heidenheimer AJ, Johnston M, Le Vine VT, editors. Political Corruption: A Handbook. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Publishers; 1989. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315126647/political-corruption-michael-johnston
  48. 48. Klitgaard R. Strategies against corruption. In: Presentation at Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional Foro Iberoamericano sobre el Combate a la Corrupción; 15-16 June; Santa Cruz de la Sierra. 1998. Available from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/clad/clad0035403.pdf
  49. 49. Klitgaard R. Fighting Corruption, CESifo DICE Report, ISSN 1613-6373, ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München. 2011;09(2):31-35
  50. 50. Lambsdorff JG. Causes and consequences of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? In: International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2006. pp. 3-50
  51. 51. Doig A, Theobald R, editors. Corruption and Democratisation. London, Engeland, Routledge: Franl Cass Company Limited; 5 Nov 2013. Available from: https://www.routledge.com/Corruption-and-Democratisation/Doig-Theobald/p/book/9781315039602
  52. 52. Bauhr M, Czibik Á, de Fine LJ, Fazekas M. Lights on the shadows of public procurement: Transparency as an antidote to corruption. Governance. 2020;33(3):495-523
  53. 53. Liao TS, Wang MT, Tserng HP. A framework of electronic tendering for government procurement: A lesson learned in Taiwan. Automation in Construction. 2002;11(6):731-742
  54. 54. Bryson JM. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: 2 ed. Elsevier Inc. 2015. pp. 515-521. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74043-8. Available from: https://experts.umn.edu/en/publications/strategic-planning-for-public-and-nonprofit-organizations
  55. 55. Parenti C, Noori N, Janssen M. A smart governance diffusion model for blockchain as an anti-corruption tool in smart cities. Journal of Smart Cities and Society. 2022;1(1):71-92
  56. 56. Yang C. Is there a role for Blockchain for enhancing public procurement integrity. In: OECD Global Anficorrupfion & Integrity Forum. Mexico; 2019
  57. 57. Jordan P, Mubin O, Silva PA. A conceptual research agenda and quantification framework for the relationship between science-fiction media and human-computer interaction. In: Stephanidis C, editor. HCI International 2016–Posters’ Extended Abstracts. HCI 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science.Vol 617. Cham: Springer; 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40548-3_9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-40548-3_9
  58. 58. Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloomberg L. Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review. 2014;74(4):445-456
  59. 59. de la Porte C. Principal–agent theory and the open method of Co-ordination: The case of the European employment strategy. Journal of European Public Policy. 2011;18(4):485-503
  60. 60. Minastireanu EA, Mesnita G. An analysis of the most used machine learning algorithms for online fraud detection. Information Economics. 1 Jan 2019;23(1). DOI: 10.12948/issn14531305/23.1.2019.01. Available from: https://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/89/01%20-%20minastireanu,%20mesnita.pdf
  61. 61. Köbis N, Starke C, Rahwan I. The promise and perils of using artificial intelligence to fight corruption. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2022;4(5):418-424
  62. 62. Kogut T, Ritov I. Target dependent ethics: Discrepancies between ethical decisions toward specific and general targets. Current Opinion in Psychology. 1 Dec 2015;6:145-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.005
  63. 63. Nakpodia F, Adegbite E, Amaeshi K, Owolabi A. Neither principles nor rules: Making corporate governance work in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;151(2):391-408
  64. 64. Gronbach L. Social cash transfer payment systems in sub-Saharan Africa. In: CSSR Work Papers. 2020. p. 452
  65. 65. Magakwe J. Curbing Corruption in Public Procurement through Effective Public Procurement Policy in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Western Cape Province. Pretoria, South Africa: University of South Africa; 2023
  66. 66. Bartholomew DJ, Knott M, Moustaki I. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach. Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 28 Jun 2011. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Latent+Variable+Models+and+Factor+Analysis%3A+A+Unified+Approach%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781119973706
  67. 67. Mungiu A, Loncaric M, Mundo BV, Carolina A, Braga S, Weinhardt M, et al. Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: 2011
  68. 68. Bisht D, Singh R, Gehlot A, Akram SV, Singh A, Montero EC, et al. Imperative role of integrating digitalization in the firms finance: A technological perspective. Electronics. 2022;11(19):3252
  69. 69. Akintoye A, Beck M, Chinyio E, Udeaja C. A critical analysis of the factors influencing the advancement of e-procurement in the UK construction industry. Automation in Construction. 2019;104:1-13
  70. 70. Arora RU. Digital Financial Services to Women: Access and Constraints. InGender Bias and Digital Financial Services in South Asia: Obstacles and Opportunities on the Road to Equal Access. Leeds, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited; 13 Mar 2020. pp. 51-72. DOI: 10.1108/978-1-83867-855-520201004. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/978-1-83867-855-520201004/full/html
  71. 71. Algarni AM, Thayananthan V, Malaiya YK. Quantitative assessment of cybersecurity risks for mitigating data breaches in business systems. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(8):3678
  72. 72. Argandoña A. Corruption and companies: The use of facilitating payments. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005;60(3):251
  73. 73. Graycar A, Smith RG. Handbook of global research and practice in corruption. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2011
  74. 74. Ware GT, Moss S, Campos JE, Noone GP. Corruption in Procurement. In: Handbook of Global Research and Practice in Corruption. China: Edward Elgar Publishing; 30 Nov 2011. DOI: 10.4337/9781849805032.00011
  75. 75. Davis KE. Anti-corruption law and systemic corruption: The role of direct responses. Revista Direito GV, São Paulo, v. 17, n. 2, maio/ago. 2021;16(21-32):e2129. DOI: 10.1590/2317- 6172202129
  76. 76. Johnston M. Corruption, contention and reform: the power of deep democratization. Edinburgh, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/za/universitypress/subjects/politics-international-relations/comparative-politics/corruption-contention-and-reform-power-deep-democratization?format=HB&isbn=9781107034747
  77. 77. Rider B, editor. Research handbook on international financial crime. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 27 Nov 2015. Available from: https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/research-handbook-on-international-financial-crime-9781783475780.html
  78. 78. Warf B. Geographies of Corruption. GeoJournal. 2014;(Teachout):1-13
  79. 79. Cole WM. Institutionalizing a global anti-corruption regime: Perverse effects on country outcomes. 1984-2012. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. Feb 2015;56(1):53-80. DOI: 10.1177/0020715215578885
  80. 80. Mantzaris E, Pillay P. Corruption: Consequences for socio-economic well-being in South Africa. Alternation. 2019;26(1):40-62
  81. 81. Sari AR. The impact of good governance on the quality of public management decision making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management. 2023;1(2):39-46
  82. 82. Banfield EC. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press; 1958. Available from: https://ixtheo.de/Record/1146180772
  83. 83. Miceli MP, Near JP. Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees. Journal of Business Ethics. 1993;12(8). Available from: https://philpapers.org/rec/MICBTW-2
  84. 84. Caneppele S, Martocchia S. Italian mafias, public procurement and public works in southern Italy. In: Organized Crime, Corruption and Crime Prevention: Essays in Honor of Ernesto U Savona. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 31 Oct 2013. pp. 293-299. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01839-3_33. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-01839-3_33
  85. 85. Pozsgai-Alvarez J. The abuse of entrusted power for private gain: Meaning, nature and theoretical evolution. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2020;74(4):433-455
  86. 86. Mauro P. The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure. International Monetary Fund. 1 Sep 1996. ISBN: 9781451852097. Available from: https://www.bookstore.imf.org/books/the-effects-of-corruption-on-growth-investment-and-government-expenditure
  87. 87. Rogers DS, Duraiappah AK, Antons DC, Munoz P, Bai X, Fragkias M, et al. A vision for human well-being: Transition to social sustainability. Current Opinion in Environment Sustainability. 2012;4(1):61-73
  88. 88. Razafindrakoto M, Roubaud F. Are international databases on corruption reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development. 2010;38(8):1057-1069
  89. 89. Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research. 2008;45(6):633-644
  90. 90. Gorsira M, Denkers A, Huisman W. Both sides of the coin: Motives for corruption among public officials and business employees. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;151:179-194
  91. 91. Button M. Private Policing. Routledge; 2019. Available from: https://www.routledge.com/Private-Policing/Button/p/book/9781351240772
  92. 92. Loader K. Is public procurement a successful small business support policy? A review of the evidence. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2013;31(1):39-55

Written By

Jack Magakwe

Submitted: 23 November 2023 Reviewed: 27 November 2023 Published: 17 July 2024