Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Trichoderma spp, Allelopathies in the Rhizosphere of Plants: For the Management of Soil Borne Pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani

Written By

Pranjal Kr. Kaman, Daisy Senapoty, Vithanala Shiva Sai Swaroop, Hiranya Kr. Deva Nath, Apurba Das, Pranab Dutta and Amar Bahadur

Submitted: 02 October 2023 Reviewed: 21 February 2024 Published: 17 July 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004753

From the Edited Volume

Challenges in Plant Disease Detection and Recent Advancements

Amar Bahadur

Chapter metrics overview

2 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Among the many plant diseases, those brought on by soil-borne pathogens are the ones that result in significant losses. Rhizoctonia solani, one of many soil-borne pathogens, has been identified as a potential culprit for yield loss due to its broad host range. Prior to the development of extremely potent and selective fungicides, chemical treatment is not a practical option. However, the dangers associated with agrochemicals are reducing their use. Scientists are becoming more interested in biological management in this situation because it is an environmentally beneficial method. Biological control is the process through which one organism controls another. Trichoderma has become one of the most important biocontrol agents currently available due to its extensive antagonistic pathways. There are 89 species in this genus, and numerous strains have been discovered to be powerful biocontrol agents for plant diseases. The species T. viride, T. hamantum, T. koningii, and others make up the majority of the Trichoderma biocontrol agents. Direct and indirect antagonistic mechanisms are the two categories. Mycoparasitism, antibiosis, and pathogen enzyme inactivation are examples of direct methods. Indirect mechanisms include competition for nutrients and space, the activation of plant defensive systems (such as induced systemic resistance), and others. Their antagonistic characteristics are affected by a number of variables, including pH and temperature.

Keywords

  • antibiosis
  • parasitism
  • Rhizoctonia solani
  • stimulants
  • Trichoderma

1. Introduction

Both prices are rising as a result of major losses in both quality and quantity caused by plant diseases. Since the beginning of the green revolution, controlling plant diseases and pests has become more and more dependent on the extensive use of dangerous chemicals. The cost of attaining the green revolution, however, was incalculable since agrochemicals damaged the ecosystem and upset the delicate balance between its various components. Recent research revealing that the widespread use of pesticides in the previous 10 to 15 years has had little effect in lowering the losses due to pests and diseases demonstrate that chemical use has reached a saturation point. As a result, we now need to decide whether or not supporting the use of these substances is a wise course of action. According to this viewpoint, environmentally friendly crop pest and disease management has been recognised as a substitute and essential element of sustainable agriculture. In the natural environment, microorganisms have been parasitizing both uncultivated and domesticated plants for millions of years. However, scientists have recently become interested in the phenomenon of employing bacteria for disease management, also referred to as biological control. As a biological control agent for soil-found plant pathogenic fungus, Trichoderma species have been investigated [1]. Several strains of Trichoderma considerably lessened the severity of plant diseases caused by pathogens such Gaeumannomycesgraminis var. tritici, Sclerotium rolfsii, Phythiumaphanidermatium, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizoctonia solani in greenhouse and field conditions. Based on findings from several studies [1, 2, 3, 4]. Trichoderma strains have the capacity to either directly or indirectly inhibit fungal phytopathogens. Mycoparasitism, antibiosis, and pathogen enzyme inactivation are examples of direct techniques. Examples of indirect pathways include competition for resources and space, environmental changes, and the activation of plant defence mechanisms [5]. Salinity, alkalinity, nutritional insufficiency, drought, and other environmental factors all allow Trichodema to survive [6, 7]. This chapter will clearly explain the many mechanisms involved in Trichoderma’s antagonistic behaviour.

Trichoderma interact with pathogenic fungi to advantageously reduce the growth of pathogens. In the past, Howell et al. [8] demonstrated that, in the presence of favourable growth conditions, Trichoderma rapidly filled the culture space and gradually covered the agar plate’s surface, preventing the growth of the pathogenic fungus R. solani. Infections with hyperparasites are one of the key ways that Trichoderma species eliminate infections [9, 10, 11]. The identification of pathogens and hyperparasite signalling were greatly aided by the markedly increased gene expression of proteases linked to host recognition, oligopeptide transporters, and GPCRs during hyperparasite infection [12, 13, 14]. During the hyperparasite infection of Trichoderma in hosts, there was a considerable upregulation of the expression of genes associated with hydrolase secretion. Trichoderma’s capacity to become hyperparasitic in hosts was decreased by deleting these genes.

Advertisement

2. Role of Rhizoctonia solani in causing plant diseases

Soil-borne fungus is the primary reason for the fall in crop productivity. Currently, R. solani is one of 1258 different fungus species that have been identified as potential crop diseases [15, 16, 17]. Plant roots and lower stems can become infected by the fungus pathogen R. solani. There are few options for controlling R. solani infections because of the variety of hosts and lack of resistant plant species. The majority of researchers are more interested in biological control among the several methods for preventing soil-borne diseases that have been suggested (Tables 1 and 2) [15, 23, 24, 25].

Trichoderma spp.MetabolitesDisease control
T. lignorum, T. virens, T. hamatum, T. harzianum and T. pseudokoningii (Rifai)Unknown inhibitory substances; Extracellular metabolites or antibiotics, or lytic enzyme actionDamping-off of bean
T. virens isolates GL3 and GL21Antibiotics gliovirin and gliotoxinDamping-off of cucumber

Table 1.

Trichoderma spp. antagonism against diseases caused by R. solani.

Trichoderma spp.Reference
T. viride, T. harzianum[18]
T. viride[19]
T. harzianum, T. virens and T. atroviride[20]
Trichoderma spp. Isolates[21]
T. asperellum[22]

Table 2.

Uses of various Trichoderma spp. for the control of sheath blight of rice.

Advertisement

3. Different mechanisms involved in the antagonism of Trichoderma

There are broadly two different mechanisms in which Trichoderma inhibits the growth of phytopathogenic fungus.

  1. Direct mechanism

  2. In direct mechanism

3.1 Direct mechanism

In this approach, the biocontrol agent uses many mechanisms, such as mycoparasitism, antibiosis, pathogen enzyme inactivation, etc. to directly impede the growth of the phytopathogenic fungus.

3.1.1 Mycoparasitism

Mycoparasitism is another name for this biocontrol mechanism. This is an instance of another fungus parasitizing a harmful fungus. Fungi are recognised to cause the bulk of plant diseases, and it is well-known that many fungi can parasitize other fungi. The phenomenon of one fungus parasitizing another is referred to as mycoparasitism, hyperparasitism, direct parasitism, and interfungal parasitism. Coiling (Figure 1), hooks, and appressorium-like structures are used by Trichoderma species to adhere to host hyphae before secreting lytic enzymes to compromise the host cell wall [27]. Mycoparasites are fungi that may infiltrate other fungi and scavenge nutrients for their own growth by generating enzymes that breakdown cell walls. The majority of phytopathogenic fungi have an amorphous arrangement of the structural component chitin and the filler substance b-1,3-glucan in their cell walls. B-1,3-glucanases and chitinases have been discovered to directly affect how Trichoderma species interact with their hosts during mycoparasitism [27]. The Trichodermaschitinolytic system (NAGase) is composed of two different types of enzymes: chitinases and N acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase. Despite multiple studies, it is still unclear how Trichoderma produces and controls chitinolytic and glucanolytic enzymes [23, 27].

Figure 1.

Transmission electron microscopy of T. Harzianum mycelium growing on R. solani. The arrow indicates the T. Harzianum coiling. Bar = 10 mm (source: Ref. [26]).

3.1.2 Antibiosis

The biological control agent’s capacity to suppress pathogenic organisms by secreting toxic or inhibitory substances is known as antibiosis. This occurs when a biocontrol agent and a pathogenic fungus interact, and some strains of Trichoderma produce low molecular weight diffusible compounds or antibiotics that inhibit the growth of other bacteria. The majority of Trichoderma strains release toxic compounds, both volatile and nonvolatile, that prevent fungus they have antagonised from colonising. Heptelidic acid, alamethicins, tricholin, peptaibols, 6-penthyl-pyrone, massoilactone, viridin, gliovirin, and glisoprenins are a few of the metabolites created [28]. Gliovirin can be produced by the strains of T. virens that are most effective for biocontrol [29]. Furthermore, the strains’ performance was undoubtedly correlated with the pyrone antibiotics they produced, which are produced by the most effective isolates of T. harzianum against Gaeumannomycesgraminis var. tritici. Combining hydrolytic enzymes and antibiotics results in greater antagonism than using each strategy separately (Table 3) [29, 32].

ProteinsEncodinggeneAccession number (Gene Bank)Trichoderma spp.
PeptaibolN.A.N.A.Trichoderma spp.
LipoxygenaseN.A.N.A.T. atroviride
Polyketide synthases (PKS)pks4N.A.T. atroviride
pks4N.A.T. reesei
pks4N.A.T. virens
GliCCytochromeP450gliCN.A.T. virens
gliFN.A.T. virens
ɣ-glutamylcyclotransferase-likeproteingliKN.A.T. virens
Glutathione S-transferasegliGN.A.T. virens
NRPSmodulesgliPN.A.T. virens
O-methyltransferasegliMN.A.T. virens
Cytochrome P450 monooxygenasestri4FN394496T. arundinaceum
Major facilitator super family transporterThmfs1JN689385T. harzianum
L-amino acidoxidaseTh-LAAOGU902953T. harzianum
ABC transportersTaabc2AY911669T. atroviride

Table 3.

Trichoderma spp. proteins associated with antagonism and involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites deleterious to R. solani [30, 31].

N.A.: Not available.

3.1.3 Pathogen enzyme inactivation

Trichoderma degrades the toxic compounds that pathogenic bacteria secrete, which reduces their capacity to inhibit Trichoderma growth through the utilisation of heat shock proteins, ABC transporter proteins, and other mechanisms [33, 34, 35]. In order to prevent Trichoderma from growing and to offset the host’s inhibition during contact between the two organisms, the host pathogen secretes several toxic substances. Transmembrane proteins with specific roles include ABC Transporter proteins. These proteins have two ends, one of which is referred to as a ligand binding domain and the other as an ATP binding domain. The ligand binding domain only permits a limited number of molecules to enter the cells, but the ATP binding domain eliminates any harmful substances that enter the cell. These ABC transporter proteins are triggered when some inhibitors of the host enter the cell of the biocontrol agent, and they force the toxins out of the cell before they can harm the cells [33, 34, 35].

3.2 In direct mechanism

By competing for nutrients and available space, the biocontrol agent indirectly prevents the growth of pathogenic fungus, a process known as induced systemic resistance (ISR).

3.2.1 Competition for nutrients and space

One of the most frequent causes of death for microorganisms is starvation, and fungal phytopathogens are biologically controlled by competition for few resources [36]. The majority of filamentous fungus need iron to survive, and when iron is scarce, the majority of fungi produce siderophores, low molecular weight chelators that are specific to ferric iron, to mobilise ambient iron [37]. The iron is then taken out of the ferri-siderophore complexes using specialised uptake processes. According to studies by [1], some Trichoderma isolates produce potent siderophores that chelate iron and inhibit the growth of other fungi (Table 4). Pythium is affected by the soil’s composition and iron availability as well as Trichoderma’s capacity to biocontrol it. Furthermore, T. harzianum competes with Fusarium oxysporum for nutrients and rhizosphere colonisation, preventing it from growing and boosting the efficiency of biocontrol when nutrient concentrations fall [38]. It has been discovered that Botrytis cinerea, the pathogenic agent that is most common throughout the pre- and post-harvest period in many countries, is particularly significant for the biocontrol of phytopathogens [39]. Because of its enormous genetic variability, the fungus can develop resistance to new chemical fungicides almost immediately after exposure [39]. The advantage of using Trichoderma to manage B. cinerea is that it allows multiple mechanisms to function at once, virtually preventing the generation of resistant strains. The most crucial of these mechanisms is nutritional competition since B. cinerea is so susceptible to food shortages. Trichoderma has a greater ability than other species to move and absorb soil nutrients (Figure 2).

ProteinsEncodinggeneAccession number (Gene Bank)Trichoderma spp.
High-affinity glucosetransporterGtt1Gtt1AJ269534T. harzianum
EndopolygalacturonaseThpg1Thpg1AM421521T. harzianum
Harzianic acidN.A.N.A.T. harzianum
ProteasesTaPapAAAT09023T. asperellum
TaPapBAAU11329T. asperellum

Table 4.

Trichoderma spp. associated with antagonism with R. solani and involved in the competition [30, 31].

N.A.: Not available.

Figure 2.

Activities of Trichoderma spp. in rhizosphere against R. solani (source: Ref. [40]).

3.2.1.1 Stimulation of plant defence mechanism induced systemic resistance (ISR)

When plants are exposed to specific signal molecules made by PGPR or other non-pathogenic fungus biocontrol agents, a phenomena known as ISR occurs. These signal molecules are circulated throughout the plant’s entire system, activating its defences. Trichoderma strains added to the rhizosphere shield plants from a range of diseases, including viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens, by inducing resistance mechanisms similar to the hypersensitive response (HR), systemic acquired resistance (SAR), and insensitive shock response (ISR) in plants [41, 42]. Resistance causes an increase in the concentration of metabolites and protective enzymes including phenylalanine ammoniolyase (PAL) and chalcone synthase (CHS), which are responsible for the formation of phytoalexins (HR response), chitinases, and glucanases. These comprise pathogenesis-related proteins (PR) (SAR response) and oxidative stress-responsive enzymes [43]. A range of chemicals that bacteria (elicitors) emit cause plant genes to respond. As a result, a pathogen is not necessarily necessary to initiate a plant’s defence systems. Adding Trichoderma metabolites, which could trigger plant resistance. If added, Trichoderma elicitors, which are crucial for preventing infections in fruits after harvest, could have a similar result. When a plant is exposed to pathogens (fungi, bacteria, viruses, or nematodes), phytoalexins, antimicrobial peptides, and tiny proteins (such as thionins, defensins, hevein-like proteins, and knottin-like peptides) are created, and a number of antimicrobial proteins are upregulated [44, 45]. When Trichoderma, a plant pathogen, interacts with biocontrol agents, elicitors are produced. These elicitors cause plants to release something akin to PR proteins. These proteins prevent or eliminate the infection (Tables 5 and 6).

ProteinsEncodinggeneAccession number (Gene Bank)Trichoderma spp.
Seven-transmembrane receptorGpr1gpr1N.A.Trichodermaatroviride
G-proteinoneN.A.FD484960T. asperellum
G-protein ypt3N.A.FD486508T. asperellum
G-protein rab2N.A.FD485766T. asperellum
α-subunit of G protein1tga1AY036905T. atroviride
α-subunit of G protein3tga3AF452097T. atroviride
Mitogen-activatedprotein kinases (MAPK)tmkAAY141978T. virens
tvk1AY162318T. virens
Adenylate cyclase Tac1tac1EF189190T. virens
pHregulator PacCpacCN.A.T. virens
pHregulator Pac1pac1EF094462T. harzianum
Transcription factorThCtf1ctf1EU551672T. harzianum
VELVETProteinVel1vel1N.A.T. virens
XylanasetranscriptionalregulatorXyr1xyr1N.A.T. atrovide

Table 5.

Trichoderma spp. proteins associated with antagonism and involved in R. solani recognitions, signal transduction and genetic reprogramming of gene expression [30, 31].

N.A.: Not available.

ProteinsEncoding geneAccession number (Gene Bank)Trichoderma spp.
41-KDachitinasechit41N.A.T. flavus
Chitinase1N.A.FD484447T. asperellum
33-KDa Endochitinaseschit33JK840912T. harzianum
Tv-cht1AF395753T. virens
Tv-cht2AF395754T. virens
36-KDa Endochitinaseschit36YAF406791T. asperellum
42-KDa Endochitinaseschit42N.A.T. atroviride
echi42FD485995T. asperellum
chit42S78423T. harzianum
Tv-ech1AF050098T. virens
Tv-ech2AF395760T. virens
46-KDa Endochitinasechit46N.A.T. asperellum
Endochitinases (GH18)crchi1X80006T. harzianum
N-acetyl-β-Glucosaminidasesexc1YAJ314642T. asperellum
nag1N.A.T. atroviride
eng18BN.A.T. atroviride
nag1N.A.T. harzianum
Tvnag1AF395761T. virens
Tvnag2AF395762T. virens
b-1,3-glucanasestag83EU314718T. asperellum
lam1.3AJ002397T. harzianum
29-KDab-1,3-GlucanaseN.A.N.A.T. harzianum
36-KDab-1,3-GlucanaseN.A.N.A.T. harzianum
78-KDab-1,3-Glucanasebgn13.1X84085T. harzianum
b-1,6-glucanasebgn16.2N.A.T. harzianum
Tvbgn3AF395757T. virens
b-1,3-glucanaseN.A.N.A.T. koningii
Tvbgn1AF395755T. virens
Tvbgn2AF395756T. virens
Endo-1,3(4)-b-GlucanaseN.A.FD486867T. asperellum
AsparticproteasesTaAspEU816200T. asperellum
TaPAPAAAT09023T. asperellum
Sa76EF063645T. harzianum
P6281AJ967001T. harzianum
N.A.FD485588T. asperellum
SerineproteasesSpm1FD486577T. asperellum
prb1AAA34209T. harzianum
tvsp1AY242844T. virens
prb1AAA34209T. harzianum

Table 6.

Trichoderma proteins associated with mycoparasitism of R. solani [30, 31].

N.A.: Not available.

3.2.1.2 Factors influencing antagonistic activity of Trichoderma species against pathogens

The two elements that affect the antagonistic property are temperature and pH [22]; they have carried out an in vitro experiment to test the biocontrol performance of various Trichoderma isolates on R. solani at various temperatures and pH levels. At 25°C and 30°C, the three Trichoderma species (T. asperellum, T. harzianum, and Trichoderma spp.) showed their maximum mycelial development, however at 20°C, the growth rate was noticeably slower and they hardly colonised 1/4th of the medium surface. The pH range of 5 to 6 was the most acidic, while 6.5 to 7.0 is where mycelium grows at the slowest rate. Above these pH limits, there was either no or very little growth (0.9–1.2 cm).

Advertisement

4. Role of Trichoderma for management of abiotic stress

In the short term, using biological agents such as water deficit-tolerant Trichoderma may be an affordable, sustainable, and eco-friendly way to lessen the effects of drought [46, 47]. However, the interactions between particular fungal isolates and plant cultivars are complicated, and our understanding of the mechanisms behind the drought tolerance that Trichoderma colonisation induces in plants is lacking. According to Hoeksema [48] coevolution involving heritable genetic variation in both plants and microbes that promote colonisation as well as abiotic stress responses may be the basis for adaptation to mutualism as a strategy of survival under harsh environmental conditions. According to Kubicek et al. [49], Trichoderma is a “environmental opportunist and generalist” that can quickly adapt to flourish as a free-living organism or a plant symbiont in novel or challenging situations. The asexual conidiospores and chlamydospores that the fungi can produce are resistant to harsh environmental conditions. Stress caused by a water scarcity considerably reduces crop quality and output. Trichoderma inoculation may help promote plant growth and lessen the harmful effects of water deficiency stress [50, 51]. It has been shown by Mastouri et al. [52, 53] that Trichoderma inoculation affects plant performance, but only in stressed conditions. According to their research, when tomato seeds were cultivated in conditions of water deprivation, the T22 inoculation enhanced germination and other growth metrics. According to Bashyal et al. [51], plants inoculated with Trichoderma showed higher expression levels of genes linked to photosynthesis, including those encoding for photosystem I subunits, photosystem II core complex proteins, osmotin-like proteins, and stomatal development, in comparison to non-inoculated controls. Improved physiological health is shown by plants infected with Trichoderma during water scarcity [46, 54, 55] According to reports, plants injected with Trichoderma species accumulate more metabolites, such as proline, flavonoids, and phenolics. These metabolites boost antioxidant activity and guard against photooxidative damage to photosynthetic pigments and pathways [56, 57, 58]. It is thought that plants respond to droughts by increasing the amount of abscisic acid in their tissues, which controls stomatal motions and aids in maintaining water balance. According to Martinez-Medina et al. [59], compared to non-inoculated control plants, Trichoderma harzianum colonised plants showed greater expression levels of the ABA-responsive marker gene involved in various defence-related pathways.

Advertisement

5. Benefits and limitations

5.1 Benefits

  1. Trichomonia is widely used to treat post-harvest infections. Phytophthora, Sclerotium, Fusarium, and other fungal infections are said to respond favourably to it.

  2. Trichoderma strains may solubilise phosphates, which really aids in plant growth in general.

  3. Trichoderma strains are essential for bioremediation of pesticide and herbicide-contaminated soil. They are able to degrade pesticide residues made of organochlorines, organophosphates, and carbonates.

  4. Trichoderma contains a large number of biocontrol genes. The endochitinase gene from Trichoderma has been introduced in plants, including tobacco and potato plants. These plants demonstrated enhanced infection resistance.

  5. Rhizobium, Azospirilium, Bacillus subtilis, and other biofertilizers are compatible with Trichoderma as are organic manures. It works well on the seeds treated with metalaxyl and thiram, but not on seeds treated with mercurials.

5.2 Limitations

  1. For up to 4 to 5 days after using Trichoderma, no chemical fungicides should be used.

  2. Trichoderma needs adequate moisture to flourish, thus the field should not be dry.

  3. Trichoderma-treated seeds should be dried in the shade, away from direct sunshine.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Global population pressures are increasing on scarce agricultural areas, calling for an increase in productivity. On the other hand, risky pesticide effects are restricting their use, which could temporarily lower production levels. It has been determined that using environmentally friendly pest and disease management techniques is pertinent in this situation as a component of sustainable agriculture. Because most biocontrol agents are part of natural biodiversity and are safe for the environment, biological control has therefore become increasingly important. Trichoderma has become quite important since it is an excellent biocontrol agent that can work against a variety of pathogenic soil fungus. Scientists are attempting to discover the genes that are responsible for its biocontrol activity in the hope of creating transgenic plants that are similar to Bt cotton using the data from recent investigations, which have yielded many hints for future research.

References

  1. 1. Chet I, Inbar J. Biological control of fungal pathogens. Appllied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1994;48:37-43
  2. 2. Basim H, Oztork SB, Yegen O. Efficacy of a biological fungiside (planter box TrichodermaharzianumRifai T-22) against seedling root rot pathogens (Rhizoctoniasolani, Fusarium sp.) of cotton. GAP-Environmental Symposium. ÞanlÝurfa, Turkey. 1999:137-144
  3. 3. Chet I, Baker R. Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma hamatum from soil naturally suppressive to R. Solani. Phytopathology. 1981;71:286-290
  4. 4. Sivan A, Chet I. Integrated control of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi. Phytopathology. 1993;10:127-142
  5. 5. Gajera H, Domadiya R, Patel S, Kapopara M, Golakiya B. Molecular mechanism of Trichoderma as bio-control agents against phytopathogen system–a review. Current Research Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013;1(4):133-142
  6. 6. Caon L, Vargas R. Threats to Soils: Global Trends and Perspectives. New York, NY, USA: Working Paper; United Nations; 2017
  7. 7. Tandon A, Fatima T, Shukla D, Tripathi P, Srivastava S, Singh PC. Phosphate solubilization by Trichodermakoningiopsis (NBRI-PR5) under abiotic stress conditions. Journal of King Saud University. 2020;32:791-798
  8. 8. Howell CR. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Disease. 2003;87:4-10
  9. 9. Vargas WA, Mandawe JC, Kenerley CM. Multifunctional fungal plant symbionts: New tools to enhance plant growth and productivity. New Phytologist. 2011;190:806
  10. 10. Woo SL, Lorito M. nExploiting the interactions between fungal antagonists, pathogens and the plant for biocontrol. In: Vurro M, Gressel J, editors. Novel Biotechnologies for Biocontrol Agent Enhancement and Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Portici, NA, Italy: Springer; 2007
  11. 11. Sharma P. Biocontrol genes from Trichoderma species: A review. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10:19898-19907
  12. 12. Suárez MB, Vizcaíno JA, Llobell A, Monte E. Characterization of genes encoding novel peptidases in the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 using the TrichoEST functional genomics approach. Current Genetics. 2007;51:331-342
  13. 13. Flores A, Chet I, Herrera-Estrella A. Improved biocontrol activity of Trichoderma harzianum by over-expression of the proteinase-encoding gene prb1. Current Geneics. 1997;31:30-37
  14. 14. Cardoza RE, Malmierca MG, Gutiérrez S. Overexpression of erg1 gene in Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413: Effect on the induction of tomato defence-related genes. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2014;117:812-832
  15. 15. Consolo VF, Monaco CI, Cordo CA, Salerno GL. Characterization of novel Trichoderma spp. isolates as a search for effective biocontrollers of fungal diseases of economically important crops in Argentina. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28(4):1389-1398
  16. 16. Nowakowska E, Pokoj T. Changes in microbial community structure during adaptation towards polyhydroxyalkanoates production. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2009;58(2):131-139
  17. 17. Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Bussaban B, Lumyong S. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani AG-2, the causal agent of damping-off by Muscodorcinnamomi CMU-Cib 461. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28(11):3171-3177
  18. 18. Montealegre J, Valderrama L, Sanchez S, Herrera R, Besoain X, Perez LM. Biological control of Rhizoctoniasolani in tomatoes with Trichodermaharzianum mutants. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;13(2):1-2
  19. 19. Da Silva JC, Torres DB, Lustosa DC, De Filippi MCC, Da Silva GB. Rice sheath blight biocontrol and growth promotion by Trichoderma isolates from the Amazon. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science. 2012;55:243-250
  20. 20. Tsror L, Barak R, Sneh B. Biological control of black scurf on potato under organic management. Crop Protection. 2001;20(2):145-150
  21. 21. Naeimi S, Okhovvat SM, Javan-Nikkhah M, Vágvölgyi C, Khosravi V, Kredics L. Biological control of Rhizoctoniasolani AG1-1A, the causal agent of rice sheath blight with Trichoderma strains. PhytopathologiaMediterranea. 2010;49(3):287-300
  22. 22. Asad SA, Ali N, Hameed A, Khan SA, Ahmad R, Bilal M, et al. Biocontrol efficacy of different isolates of Trichoderma against soil borne pathogen Rhizoctoniasolani. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 2014;63(1):95-103
  23. 23. Benitez T, Rincon AM, Limon MC, Codon AC. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichodermastrains. Inernational Microbiology. 2004;7(4):249-260
  24. 24. Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty AP, Dey PL. Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology. 2013;29:789-803
  25. 25. Vinale F, Sivasithamparam EL, Ghisalberti R, Marra SL, Woo LM, Lorito M. Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 2008;40:1-10
  26. 26. Almeida FBDR, Cerqueira FM, Silva RDN, Ulhoa CJ, Lima AL. Mycoparasitism studies of Trichodermaharzianum strains against Rhizoctoniasolani: Evaluation of coiling and hydrolytic enzyme production. Biotechnology Letters. 2007;29(8):1189-1193
  27. 27. Kubicek CP, Mach RL, Peterbauer CK, Lorito M. Trichoderma: From genes to biocontrol. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2001;83:11-24
  28. 28. Vey A, Hoagland RE, Butt TM. Toxic metabolites of fungal biocontrol agents. In: Butt TM, Jackson C, Magan N, editors. Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress, Problems and Potential. Bristol: CAB International; 2001. pp. 311-346
  29. 29. Howell CR. The role of antibiosis in biocontrol. In: Harman GE, Kubicek CP, editors. Trichoderma and Gliocladium. Vol. 2. Padstow: Taylor & Francis; 1998. pp. 173-184
  30. 30. Pozo MJ, Baek JM, Garcıa JM, Kenerley CM. Functional analysis of tvsp1, a serine protease-encoding gene in the biocontrol agent Trichoderma virens. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2004;41(3):336-348
  31. 31. Scherm B, Schmoll M, Balmas V, Kubicek CP, Migheli Q. Identification of potential marker genes for Trichodermaharzianum strains with high antagonistic potential against Rhizoctoniasolani by a rapid subtraction hybridization approach. Current Genetics. 2009;55(1):81-91
  32. 32. Monte E. Understanding Trichoderma: Between biotechnology and microbial ecology. International Microbiology. 2001;4:1-4
  33. 33. Bae SJ, Mohanta TK, Chung JY, Ryu MJ, Park G, Shim S, et al. Trichoderma metabolites as biological control agents against Phytophthora pathogens. Biological Control. 2015;92:128-138
  34. 34. Lorito M, Woo SL. Trichoderma: A multi-purpose tool for integrated Pest management. In: Principles of Plant-Microbe Interactions. Portici, NA, Italy: Springer International Publishing; 2015
  35. 35. Seidl V, Song L, Lindquist E, Gruber S, Koptchinskiy A, Sun JB, et al. Transcriptomic response of the mycoparasitic fungus Trichodermaatrovirideto the presence of a fungal prey. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:567
  36. 36. Chet I, Inbar J, Hadar I. Fungal antagonists and mycoparasites. In: Wicklow DT, Söderström B, editors. The Mycota IV: Environmental and Microbial Relationships. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1997. pp. 165-184
  37. 37. Eisendle M, Oberegger H, Buttinger R. Biosynthesis and uptake of siderophores is controlled by the PacCmediated ambient-pH regulatory system in Aspergillusnidulans. Eukaryotic Cell. 2004;3:561-563
  38. 38. Katan J, Ginzburg C, Freeman S. Tjamos EC, Papavizas GC, Cook RJ, editors. Biological Control of Plant Diseases. Progress and Challenges for the Future. New York: Plenum Press; 1992
  39. 39. Latorre BA, Spadaro I, Rioja ME. Occurrence of resistant strains of Botrytis cinerea to anilinopyrimidine fungicides in table grapes in Chile. Crop Protection. 2002;21(10):957-961
  40. 40. Abbas A, Jiang D, Fu Y. Trichoderma spp. as antagonist of Rhizoctoniasolani. Journal Plant Pathology and Microbiology. 2017;8(3):1-9
  41. 41. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A. Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews. 2004;2:43-56
  42. 42. Harman GE. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology. 2006;96:190-194
  43. 43. Lyon GD, Stacey G, Keen NT, editors. Plant-Microbe Interactions. St. Paul: APS Press; 1999. p. 4
  44. 44. Epple P, Apel K, Bohlmann H. An Arabidopsis thalianathionin gene is inducible via a signal transduction pathway different from that for pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Physiology. 1995;109:813-820
  45. 45. Terras FRG, Schoofs H, De Bolle MFC. Analysis of two novel classes of plant antifungal proteins from radish (Raphanus sativus L.) seeds. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992;267:15301-15309
  46. 46. Shukla N, Awasthi RP, Rawat L, Kumar J. Biochemical and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2012;54:78-88
  47. 47. Brotman Y, Landau U, Cuadros-Inostroza A, Takayuki T, Fernie AR, Chet I, et al. Trichoderma-plant root colonization: Escaping early plant defense responses and activation of the antioxidant machinery for saline stress tolerance. PLoS Pathogens. 2013;9(3):1003221
  48. 48. Hoeksema JD. Ongoing coevolution in mycorrhizal interactions. New Phytologist. 2010;187(2):286-300
  49. 49. Kubicek CP, Steindorff AS, Chenthamara K, Manganiello G, Henrissat B, Zhang J, et al. Evolution and comparative genomics of the most common Trichoderma species. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:1-24
  50. 50. De Palma M, D’Agostino N, Proietti S, Bertini L, Lorito M, Ruocco M, et al. Suppression subtractive hybridization analysis provides new insights into the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) response to the plant probiotic microorganism Trichoderma longibrachiatum MK1. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2016;190:79-94
  51. 51. Bashyal BM, Parmar P, Zaidi NW, Aggarwal R. Molecular programming of drought-challenged Trichoderma harzianum-bioprimed rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:655165
  52. 52. Mastouri F, Björkman T, Harman GE. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology. 2010;100(11):1213-1221
  53. 53. Mastouri F, Björkman T, Harman GE. Trichoderma harzianum enhances antioxidant defense of tomato seedlings and resistance to water deficit. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 2012;25(9):1264-1271
  54. 54. Harman GE, Doni F, Khadka RB, Uphoff N. Endophytic strains of Trichoderma increase plants’ photosynthetic capability. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2021;130(2):529-546
  55. 55. Khoshmanzar E, Aliasgharzad N, Neyshabouri MR, Khoshru B, Arzanlou M, Asgari Lajayer B. Effects of Trichoderma isolates on tomato growth and inducing its tolerance to water-deficit stress. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2020;17:869-878
  56. 56. Mona SA, Hashem A, Abd_Allah EF, Alqarawi AA, Soliman DWK, Wirth S, et al. Increased resistance of drought by Trichoderma harzianum fungal treatment correlates with increased secondary metabolites and proline content. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2017;16(8):1751-1757
  57. 57. Scudeletti D, Crusciol CAC, Bossolani JW, Moretti LG, Momesso L, Servaz Tubana B, et al. Trichoderma asperellum inoculation as a tool for attenuating drought stress in sugarcane. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:645542
  58. 58. Tripathi R, Keswani C, Tewari R. Trichoderma koningii enhances tolerance against thermal stress by regulating ROS metabolism in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2021;16(1):116-125
  59. 59. Martínez-Medina A, Fernández I, Sánchez-Guzmán MJ, Jung SC, Pascual JA, Pozo MJ. Deciphering the hormonal signalling network behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma harzianum in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013;4:206

Written By

Pranjal Kr. Kaman, Daisy Senapoty, Vithanala Shiva Sai Swaroop, Hiranya Kr. Deva Nath, Apurba Das, Pranab Dutta and Amar Bahadur

Submitted: 02 October 2023 Reviewed: 21 February 2024 Published: 17 July 2024