Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Effect of Climate Change on Conifer Plant Species, Juniperus procera, and Podocarpus falcatus, in the Case of Ethiopia: Critical Review Using Time Series Data

Written By

Hana Tamrat Gebirehiwot, Alemayehu Abera Kedanu and Megersa Tafese Adugna

Submitted: 09 October 2023 Reviewed: 18 October 2023 Published: 04 March 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004111

From the Edited Volume

Conifers - From Seed to Sustainable Stands

Teresa Fidalgo Fonseca and Ana Cristina Gonçalves

Chapter metrics overview

67 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The Juniperus procera and Podocarpus falcatus tree species are the only indigenous conifer plants that Ethiopia has and dominantly found in dry Afromontane forests of the country. However, dry Afromontane forests are threatened by climate change. The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of climate change on the regeneration and dominance of the J. procera and P. falcatus tree species in Ethiopia. The regeneration status classes and importance value index score classes analysis was done along the time series. This study revealed that J. procera had a fair regeneration status, while P. falcatus exhibited an alternate regeneration status between fair and good. Not regenerating regeneration status was recorded in 2006–2010 and 2016–2020 time series for J. procera, while in 2011–2015 and 2021–2023 for P. falcatus. Regarding the importance value index score of the species, J. procera had the top three throughout the all-time series except in 2011–2015 which had the lowest importance value index score, whereas P. falcatus had the top three importance value index score status from 2016 to 2023 time series. Safeguarding these conifer species from the negative effects of climate change relies on the attention of all responsible bodies.

Keywords

  • Juniperus procera
  • Podocarpus falcatus
  • sustainability
  • regeneration status
  • importance value index

1. Introduction

Conifer plants are woody plants that have simple leaves, simple pollen cones, and compound or reduced ovulate cones grouped in gymnosperms. Conifer plant species are found dominantly in the major terrestrial landscapes. However, conifers have less species diversity which accounts for less than 0.3% of the species diversity from the earth’s plant species [1]. Ethiopia has eight natural vegetation types based on elevation and climate gradients. From these vegetation types, the dry Afromontane and grassland complex is found in the majority of Ethiopian parts along altitudinal gradients of 1500–3000 m.a.s.l. This forest type is considered as coniferous forest [2, 3] because the warm highland part of dry Afromontane forests with 1500 to 2500 m.a.s.l of altitude range dominated by the only two co-occurring species in the country, namely Juniperus procera and Podocarpus falcatus [4, 5]. Similarly, different scholars indicated that the dry Afromontane forest of Ethiopia is a coniferous forest. For example, the dry Afromontane coniferous forest of Dodola in the Bale Mountains [6] dominantly harbor J. procera and P. falcatus [3].

On the other hand, climate change is a common environmental problem worldwide and in Ethiopia too. For example, 19 and 3% of the country’s total area experienced significant decreasing and increasing trends of rainfall, respectively from 1901 to 2020 [7]. There is also a significant mean temperature increment trend over 120 years spatially and temporally ranged from 0.24 to 1.92°C and from 0.72 to 1.08°C, respectively in Ethiopia [7]. Similarly, climate change, mean maximum and minimum temperature, has increased by 0.047 and 0.028°C/year, respectively, for the period 1983–2014 in Ethiopia. However, the total rainfall has declined by 10.16 mm per annum whereas, the rainfall has declined by 2.198, 4.541, 1.814, and 1.608 mm per annum for Ethiopian summer, spring, autumn, and winter seasons respectively [8]. A slight increase in average temperature with an insignificant trend but a significant trend in minimum temperature is documented, while a decreasing trend of rainfall is documented in dry Afromontane forest fragments in northern Ethiopia [9].

Consequently, the dry Afromontane forest is highly sensitive to climate change in combination with other factors. For example, [10] revealed that a combination of climate, topographic factors, and local human disturbance controlled the stability of dry Afromontane forests. Furthermore, the dry Afromontane conifer forest, as well as the rest of the forest of the country, is at risk due to the expansion of agricultural land as a result of population pressure. For instance, [11] states that the pollen data indicated increased anthropogenic activity such as deforestation and agriculture during the last millennium in Ethiopia. Similarly, evergreen dry Afromontane forest patches in Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia are influenced by severe anthropogenic disturbances [12]. Furthermore, [13] indicates that there is a high level of anthropogenic activities in the Bale Mountains National Park. Climate, population growth, and anthropogenic factors are the main factors that could affect montane forest ecosystems in Kenya [14]. Similarly, [15] states that climate greatly modifies the composition, structure, productivity, disturbance regimes, water production, and nutrient retention. According to combined data of plant-wax δD and δ13C values with pollen, Ethiopian highlands’ vegetation is sensitive to precipitation changes [11].

However, the impact of climate change on regeneration and the dominance of coniferous species of dry Afromontane forest of Ethiopia has not been explored and reported in a detailed and holistic manner. For example, there are few studies on assessing the impact of climate change on the forest ecosystem of Ethiopia [15]. Therefore, the impact of climate change on coniferous species of dry Afromontane forest of Ethiopia namely J. procera and P. facaltus species are evaluated from the perspectives of the regeneration and dominance status along time series, and the predicted impact of climate change on their future spatial distribution. Therefore, this chapter provides a better understanding of the effect of climate change on the coniferous species of dry Afromontane forests that allows urgent and sustainable adaptation actions to enhance resilience.

Advertisement

2. Methodology

The data sources of this chapter were peer-reviewed published papers. The articles were searched by Google Scholar using sentences such as “impacts of climate change on the dry Afromontane forest of Ethiopia” and “climate change impact on J. procera and P. falcatus in Ethiopia.” The names of each species were used separately in the searching process. Keywords such as dry Afromontane, structure, regeneration, and Ethiopia were also used in searching for the status of dry Afromontane forests in Ethiopia. Generally, 152 articles were downloaded and from these 102 were used for this work. The collected data were organized and analyzed in time series accordingly following scientific standards. Time series data are the genuine way to understand the change in ecological processes of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in ecology [16, 17]. Therefore, in this study time series data were used to understand the effect of climate change on the regeneration and dominancy in coniferous species of Ethiopia where the dominance of the species is analyzed from the importance value index (IVI) [18] score of the species in the forest.

Data were analyzed across time series 1996–2023 for regeneration data and 2006–2023 for IVI data. The time series was fixed based on the availability of published documents on the coniferous species of Ethiopia. The time series were classified as presented here below. Time series for regeneration data: 1996–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, 2011–2015, 2016–2020, 2021–2023. Time series for IVI data: 2006–2010, 2011–2015, 2016–2020, 2021–2023. The regeneration status of a species is the potential/capacity for renewal of species in the forest community [19, 20]. The regeneration status classes were good, fair, poor, and not regenerating. The regeneration status was defined and analyzed by comparing the density of seedlings and saplings with the density of mature trees as follows [21]. Good regeneration, if the seedling is greater than the sapling and mature tree/adult (seedling > sapling > mature tree/adult). Fair regeneration, if seedling > or ≤ sapling ≤ mature tree. Poor regeneration occurs if a species survives only in the mature and sapling stages but does not have seedlings. Not regenerating, if a species is present only in an adult form. However, IVI is the sum of the species’ relative density, relative frequency, and relative dominance used to describe and compare the dominance of a species in the whole plot [18]. Where relative density is the density of a particular species in relation to the total density of all species [18]. Relative frequency is the frequency of a certain species expressed as a percentage of the sum of frequency values for all species existing [18]. Relative dominance is the basal area of a given species stated as a percentage of the total basal area of all species present [18]. The species with the highest IV index score is considered the most important in a plot and this index is used to determine the general importance of each species in the community structure. The IVI score classes were the top three, the top five, the top ten, the middle, and the lowest. The regeneration status and the IVI status of the species data were analyzed using percentiles, and the results were presented using bar graphs and tables.

Advertisement

3. The distribution and status of conifer plant species in Ethiopia

3.1 Species descriptions

J. procera is the only juniper that grows naturally in both the northern and southern hemispheres while, all other Juniperus species are confined to the northern hemisphere. J. procera is native to the mountainous regions and highlands of Sudan, Eritrea, and Ethiopia southward through East Africa and eastern DR Congo to Malawi and Zimbabwe and also in Saudi Arabia/Yemen [22, 23]. J. procera found in East Africa occurs most commonly with an altitudinal range between 1800 and 2700 m, where the rainfall averages 1000–1200 mm annually. It occurs abundantly in western Kenya and in the Ethiopian highlands [24]. J. procera, a dioecious species with distinct male and female cones, is an afro-montane tree often reaching 30–35 m high, and can reach 50 m maximum of the largest tree of its genus. J. procera is a major component of the forest that is transitional between dry, single-dominant afro-montane forest and semi-evergreen bushland and thicket. J. procera will not regenerate in mature forests, but is replaced by Podocarpus forests and similar forest types (Figure 1) [25].

Figure 1.

J. procera specie. 1. Matured tree of J. procera from St. Gebriel Church, Fiche, Ethiopia. 2. Sapling of J. procera from Salale University (General Tadesse Biru Campus), Fiche, Ethiopia.

P. falcatus specie’s family Podocarpaceae is the second largest among conifer families with incredible diversity and functional traits, and it is the dominant southern hemisphere conifer family. Furthermore, the species P. falcatus synonym with Afrocarpus gracilior is native to Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, and Uganda [26]. P. falcatus species is naturally growing up to 45 m high and 250 cm in diameter in 11 out of the 14 floral regions recognized in Ethiopia [27]. This tree was found predominantly in undifferentiated Afromontane forests with an altitude range of 1550–2800 m, a mean annual temperature of 13–20° C, a mean annual rainfall of 1200–1800 mm, and humus-rich sandy soils [27, 28]. P. falcatus is a dioecious species and is a wind-pollinated species (Figure 2) [28].

Figure 2.

P. falcatus specie. 3. Matured tree of P. falcatus from Salale University (General Tadesse Biru Campus), Fiche, Ethiopia. 4. Sapling of P. falcatus from Salale University (General Tadesse Biru Campus), Fiche, Ethiopia.

3.2 The distribution of conifer plant species in Ethiopia

J. procera and P. falcatus, plant species, are found in the dry Afromontne forest of Ethiopia predominantly and rarely in the moist montane forest (Tables 1 and 2, Figure 3). This is due to the warm highlands (“Woina Dega”) zone of dry Afromontne forest in the altitude ranges of 1500 to 2500 m.a.s.l, temperatures of 15 to 20°C and rainfall ranges between 800 and 2400 mm is characterized by the occurrence of the only two conifers in the country. The cold and dry parts of these highlands are dominated by J. procera, while the moist and humid parts support P. falcatus [5]. Similarly, the tree density of P. falcatus increased with increasing altitude from 1500 to 1900 m.a.s.l and then decreased with the absence of mature trees at 2100 m in the Harenna forest, southeastern Ethiopia [72].

NoTime seriesIVI scoreStatusForest nameVegetation typeSources
12006–201082.042ndAdelle forestDry Afromontane forest[29]
22006–201023.66top fiveBoditi forestDry Afromontane forest[29]
32006–201053.161stHugumbirda-Gratkhassu national forest priority area[30]
42011–201532.51stMenagesha Amba Mariam forestDry Afromontane forest[31]
52011–20150.43the lowestGedo forestDry Afromontane forest[32]
62011–20151.61the lowestTara Gedam forests[33]
72011–201568.421stBoda forestDry Afromontane forest[34]
82011–20151.01the lowestGendo forestMoist evergreen montane forest[35]
92016–2020125.661stYerer mountain forestDry Afromontane forest[36]
102016–202052.86in the middleKumuli forestDry Afromontane forest[37]
112016–202026.511stChilimo forestDry Afromontane forest[38]
122016–202093.521stArero forestDry Afromontane forest[39]
132016–202034.152ndAdes forest (Southeastern Ethiopia)Dry Afromontane forest[40]
142016–202016.983rdYegof forestDry Afromontane forest[41]
152016–202046.51stChilimo Gaji forestDry Afromontane forest[42]
162016–202081.451stDebre Libanos church forestsDry Afromontane forest[43]
172016–202012.2top tenAwi Zone of forestsDry Afromontane forest[44]
182016–202067.91stHugumburda forestDry Afromontane forest[45]
192016–20200the lowestGelawoldie community forestDry Afromontane forest[48]
202016–202016.9843rdYegof forestDry Afromontane forest[41]
212016–202036.22ndAdes forest (West Hararghe Zone1Dry Afromontane forest[47]
222016–20200.179the lowestAmoro forestDry Afromontane forest[48]
232016–202036.92ndGatira George’s forestDry Afromontane forest[49]
242016–20201.992the lowestGemechis forestDry Afromontane forest[50]
252016–20203.643in the middleWeiramba forestDry Afromontane forest[51]
262016–2020lowerthe lowestTore forestPlantation forest[52]
272021–202318.46top fiveTulu Korma forestDry Afromontane forest[53]
282021–202315.53top tenHarego forestDry Afromontane forest[54]
292021–2023154.91stHurubu forestDry Afromontane forest[55]
302021–2023148.51stGennemar forestDry Afromontane forest[56]
312021–2023(upper altitude) 43.061stWerganbula forestDry Afromontane forest[57]
322021–2023(Edge) 32.492ndBale Mountains National Park forestMoist evergreen montane forest[13]
332021–2023(Interior) 40.612ndBale Mountains National Park forestMoist evergreen montane forest[13]
342021–20236.72in the middleGosh-Beret forestDry Afromontane forest[58]
352021–202312.76in the middleShoti forest[59]
362021–202315.943Menfeskidus Monastery forestDry Afromontane forest[60]
372021–202341.72ndDindin forestDry Afromontane forest[61]
382021–2023149.51stLess disturbed forest of Beyeda districtDry Afromontane forest[62]
392021–2023136.81stModerately disturbed forest of Beyeda districtDry Afromontane forest[62]
402021–2023149.21stHighly disturbed forest of Beyeda districtDry Afromontane forest[62]

Table 1.

IVI status data of Juniperus procera species.

NoTime seriesIVI scoreStatusForest nameVegetation typeSources
12006–20109.35top tenHugumbirda-Gratkhassu National forest priority area[30]
22011–20155.6in the middleGendo forestMoist evergreen montane forest[35]
32011–201532.6top fiveMenagesha Amba Mariam forestDry Afromontane forest[31]
42011–201519.62top fiveGedo forestDry Afromontane forest[32]
52011–201552.47top threeKimphe Lafa natural forestDry Afromontane forest[63]
62011–2015lowerthe leastBoda forestDry Afromontane forest[34]
72016–202018.213rdBerbere forestMoist evergreen montane forest[64]
82016–202011.786in the middleYegof forestDry Afromontane forest[41]
92016–202024.83rdWabero forestMoist evergreen montane forest[65]
102016–202074.51stAdes forest (West Hararghe Zone)Dry Afromontane forest[47]
112016–202074.15top tenKumuli forestDry Afromontane forest[37]
122016–202013.773rdChilimo forestDry Afromontane forest[38]
132016–202049.061stAdes forest (Southeastern Ethiopia)Dry Afromontane forest[40]
142016–202011.79in the middleYegof forestDry Afromontane forest[41]
152016–202042.872ndChilimo Gaji forestDry Afromontane forest[42]
162016–20203.43in the middleHugumburda forestDry Afromontane forest[45]
172016–20201.7the leastCoffee-based Zegie Peninsula forestDry Afromontane forest[66]
182016–20200.49the lowestNon-coffee Zegie Peninsula forestDry Afromontane forest[66]
192016–202070.291stMunessa forestDry Afromontane forest[67]
202016–2020lowerthe lowestTore forestPlantation forest[52]
212016–202050.351stAsabot forestDry Afromontane forest[68]
222016–202011.5top tenGatira George’s forestDry Afromontane forest[49]
232016–202013.413top tenGemechis forestDry Afromontane forest[50]
242021–202317.14top tenShoti forest[59]
252021–202332.991stKenech forestMoist evergreen montane forest[69]
262021–202331.322ndTulu Korma forestDry Afromontane forest[53]
272021–202348.9top fiveHurubu forestDry Afromontane forest[55]
282021–202391.52ndGennemar forestDry Afromontane forest[56]
292021–2023(upper altitude) 37.32ndWerganbula forestDry Afromontane forest[57]
302021–2023(Edge) 13.44top tenBale Mountains National Park forestMoist evergreen montane forest[13]
312021–2023(Interior) 29.49top fiveBale Mountains National Park forestMoist evergreen montane forest[13]
322021–2023lowerthe lowestTulu Lafto forest[70]
332021–2023lowerthe lowestMenfeskidus Monastery forestDry Afromontane forest[60]
342021–202349.91stDindin forestDry Afromontane forest[61]

Table 2.

IVI status data of P. falcatus species.

Figure 3.

Map of Ethiopian vegetation types. Source: [71].

3.3 Status of conifer plant species in Ethiopia

3.3.1 Regeneration status of J. Procera and P. falcatus species

The regeneration status and IVI score of the species are an indicator of the species’ health and sustainability, and hence of the forest ecosystem. The analysis indicated that J. procera had a good and fair regeneration status in equal percent in the time series of 1996–2000. However, no data was found during 2001–2005. Fair, poor, and not regenerating statuses were recorded in equal proportion in the 2006–2010 time series. Good (14.28%), fair (57.14%), and poor (28.57%) regeneration status were documented in the time series of 2011–2015. Good, poor, and not regenerating status were found in the same proportion each (20%) while, fair regeneration (40%) was found to have the highest percentage in the time of 2016–2020. J. procera had a good (12.5%) and fair (87.5%) regeneration status in the 2021–2023 time series (Figure 4). Overall, J. procera had the highest percentage of fair regeneration status than the other regeneration statuses from 2011 to 2015 to 2021–2023 time series.

Figure 4.

Regeneration status of J. procera along time series. Source: (see Table 3).

J. procera species
NoTime seriesRegeneration statusForest nameSource
11996–2000GoodMenagesha forest[73]
21996–2000FairGara Ades forest[73]
32006–2010FairBoditi forest[29]
42006–2010Not regeneratingDenkoro forest[74]
52006–2010PoorAdelle forest[29]
62011–2015PoorGedo forest[32]
72011–2015FairMenagesha Amba Mariam forest[31]
82011–2015FairChilimo forest[75]
92011–2015FairBorana forests[76]
102011–2015PoorDebirelibanos Monastery forest[77]
112011–2015GoodYegof mountain forest[78]
122011–2015FairGendo moist montane forest[35]
132016–2020GoodEntoto mountain and the surrounding area forest[79]
142016–2020Not regeneratingGedo forest[80]
152016–2020FairYerer mountain forest[36]
162016–2020FairKumuli forest[37]
172016–2020FairChilimo forest[38]
182016–2020PoorArero forest[39]
192016–2020Not regeneratingDry Afromontane forests of Awi Zone[44]
202016–2020PoorTore forest[52]
212016–2020FairAsabot forest[68]
222016–2020GoodAdes forest[47]
232021–2023FairTulu Korma forest[53]
242021–2023FairHurubu natural forest[55]
252021–2023GoodWerganbula forest[57]
262021–2023FairDindin natural forest[61]
272021–2023FairHarego forest[54]
282021–2023FairGosh-Beret forest[58]
292021–2023FairMenfeskidus Monastery forest[60]
302021–2023FairGamataja Community forest[81]

Table 3.

Regeneration status data of Juniperus procera species.

The J. procera species is among the first highest density of naturally regenerated woody species with 369 individuals/ha in the case of Entoto Mountain and the surrounding area in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in recent times (2020) [79]. Similarly, [73] states that J. procera is one of the species with the highest seedling densities in Menagesha forest before 25 years. Contrary to this, [82] documented very few J. procera in the Wof-Washa natural forest before 28 years. Regarding soil seed bank distribution recent finding shows that J. procera was the third with the highest relative frequency in soil seed bank in the case of Buska Mountain in Ethiopia [83]. Recently, it has been noted that the effect of increased temperature due to climate change on the regeneration of forest species is a common problem at the global level as in the case of central Spain [84]. Nevertheless, the documented “good regeneration status” of the J. procera species is not satisfactory to ensure the species’ healthiness and sustainability as the highest percentage is fair regeneration from 2011 to 2015 to 2023 time series. In the long run, if the regeneration status goes with a similar trend the species would be at risk.

The regeneration status analysis was also done for P. falcatus species. Hundred (100) percent of poor, fair, and good regeneration status were documented in the time series of 1996–2000, 2001–2005, and 2006–2010, respectively. Not regenerated (14.28%), poor (14.28%), fair (42.85%), and good (28.57%) regeneration status were documented in the time series of 2011–2015. The highest percentage in good regeneration status (77.78%) of P. falcatus species was observed than poor (11. 11) and fair (11. 11) in the time series of 2016–2020. Regeneration status that was not regenerated (16.67%), poor (16.67%), fair (33.33%), and good (33.33%) regeneration status were documented in the time series of 2021–2023 (Figure 5). Generally, P. falcatus species had an alternate regeneration status between fair and good from 2001 to 2005 to 2020–2023.

Figure 5.

Regeneration status of P. falcatus along time series. Source: (see Table 4).

P. falcatus species
NoTime seriesRegeneration statusForest nameSource
11996–2000PoorGara Ades forest[73]
21996–2000PoorMenagesha forest[73]
32001–2005FairHarena forest[20]
42006–2010GoodMunessa-Shashemene natural forest[85]
52011–2015PoorGedo forest[32]
62011–2015FairMenagesha Amba Mariam forest[31]
72011–2015GoodDebirelibanos Monastery forest[77]
82011–2015GoodChilimo forest[75]
92011–2015FairBorana forests[76]
102011–2015Not regeneratingYegof forest[78]
112011–2015FairGendo moist Montane forest[35]
122016–2020GoodKumuli forest[37]
132016–2020goodChilimo forest[38]
142016–2020GoodChilimo Gaji forest[42]
152016–2020PoorAsabot forest[68]
162016–2020FairMunessa forest[67]
172016–2020GoodGedo forest[80]
182016–2020GoodBerbere Afromontane moist forest[64]
192016–2020GoodAdes forest[47]
202016–2020GoodDodola forest[86]
212021–2023FairTulu Korma forest[53]
222021–2023FairHurubu forest[55]
232021–2023GoodWerganbula forest[57]
242021–2023GoodDindin forest[61]
252021–2023Not regeneratingKenech forest[69]
262021–2023PoorGamataja community forest[81]

Table 4.

Regeneration status data of P. falcatus species.

The P. falcatus species is among the top ten species with the highest seedling densities in Gara Ades and Menagesha forest before 25 years [73]. Infection of P. falcatus by C. uberata in leaves, young stems, and fruit is documented in southeastern Ethiopia and central Ethiopia that could be a threat to the regeneration of P. falcatus regeneration [87]. Furthermore, infected fruit ultimately led to the rotting of fruit and seed, which limited the seed source for P. falcatus regeneration of P. falcatus [87]. Even though the documented percent of “good regeneration status” of the P. falcatus species is decreasing from time to time, the documented good regeneration status does not indicate satisfactory to ensure the species’ healthiness and sustainability. This is because in the time series of 2021–2023, the sum of the percentage of not regenerating and poor regeneration status is equal to good and fair regeneration status.

3.3.2 The dominance (IVI) status of the J. Procera and P. falcatus species

IVI score analysis shows that the J. procera scored top three, the lowest, top three, and top three classes in the time series of 2006–2010, 2011–2015, 2016–2020, and 2021–2023, respectively (Figure 6). This might indicate that J. procera tree is well adapted to the complex pressure of environmental and disturbance factors that regulate the distribution, abundance, and productivity of the species from previous to current conditions. Since [88] indicates the significant impact of altitude, aspect, slope, grazing, and human interference on species distribution and the formation of plant communities in dry Afromontane forest patches of northwestern Ethiopia. Even if J. procera is the dominant tree in the dry Afromontane forest of Ethiopia, it is one of the species that was observed with some stumps, few logs, and dead but standing individuals in the Denkoro forest [74].

Figure 6.

IVI score status of J. procera along time series. Source: (see Table 1).

The IVI score of P. falcatus was the top ten, top five, top three, and top three classes across the time series of 2006–2010, 2011–2015, 2016–2020, and 2021–2023, respectively (Figure 7). This indicated the increasing dominance trend of P. falcatus species along time series. This might be because P. falcatus will regenerate in matured forest and the matured forest could gradually dominated by P. falcatus species [25].

Figure 7.

Status of the IVI score of P. falcatus along time series. Source: (see Table 2).

3.4 Effect of climate change on sustainability of conifer plant species in Ethiopia

Climate change is affecting living organism distribution in general and the effect will continue to influence the future distribution of living organisms. For example, ref. [89] indicated that all vegetation types are affected by climate changes and forests are affected by altering forest regeneration patterns, a decrease in dominance of conifer species, compositional and structural changes in forests, and upward migration of species in the mountains. For instance, ref. [90] states that endemic Juniperus species of China predicted to lose an entire of their suitable habitats due to change in temperature annual range and isothermality under full dispersal and RCP4.5 scenarios. Similar to this, suitable habitats of J. procera in Ethiopia will be decreased by 79.84, 91.17, 75.31, and 96.25% in Mid-century RCP2.6, Mid-century RCP8.5, End-century RCP2.6, and End-century RCP8.5 when compared with current distributions, respectively [91]. Furthermore, indicated that the annual growth of J. procera in Ethiopia is mainly controlled by precipitation [92]. Similarly, [93] found that reduced rainfall will lead to high-level dieback of the J. procera species as observed in east-facing slopes than in west-facing slopes as the west-facing slope shows greener vegetation due to the aspect receiving higher rainfall in the case of Alsouda highlands, Saudi Arabia. Ref. [94] shows the poor regeneration status of J. procera under protected conditions after 3 years of enclosure and under open management systems in a dry Afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia, indicating that protecting the forest from livestock and human disturbance only is unlikely to lead to regeneration of this species. This might be due to moisture limitation as [95] states that poor soil moisture and nutrient conditions in dry highlands in Ethiopia result in low rates of seedling field survival and growth of native trees. Ref. [96] also states that woody plant species’ seedling survival depends on both abiotic and biotic factors in an African montane forest. For instance, drought stress and potential heat stress affect the viability, growth potential, and photochemical efficiency of young J. seravschanica trees in the field in the case of the mountains of Oman [97].

P. falcatus was predicted to expand to higher elevations under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. in the future (2070) in the case of South Africa [98]. Even though there is an environmentally suitable extensive area (>48%) in the southeastern escarpment of the main Ethiopian Rift for the P. falcatus species, only a small portion open-land area is practically available for rehabilitation since the area has been intensively cultivated to support the densely inhabited population [99]. From a regeneration point of view, seed germination of the P. falcatus species naturally occurred under the shed. For example, ref. [72] pointed out that about 74% of the seedling population of P. falcatus species was found in the shed and 26% in the open with a soil moisture content of between 15.6 and 27.2%, especially from 21.5 to 23.2%. Similarly, [86] recorded higher proportions of seedlings (79.45%) and saplings (72.05%) under canopy shades than in open areas with seedlings (20.6%) and saplings (27.95%). Therefore, decreased rainfall amount combined with increased temperature might influence the natural regeneration of conifer species by causing the moisture stress to the forest soil. Ref. [100] indicates positive and significant correlations when the tree-ring chronologies were compared with annual rainfall and rainfall at the main growing season but not for temperature, pointing to rainfall as the major climatic driver of plant growth in the dry Afromontane forest fragments of northern Ethiopia. Similarly, [101] shows the impact of the duration and frequency of periods of water limitation on forest structure and growth of dry tropical montane forests.

Advertisement

4. Conclusions and recommendations

J. procera and P. falcatus tree species are the only conifer plants that are found dominantly in the dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. However, dry Afromontane forests are sensitive to climate change mainly to decreasing rainfall and increased temperature. J. procera species exhibited fair regeneration status while P. falcatus exhibited alternating regeneration status between fair and good even in the face of climate change. IVI score of the species indicated that J. procera and P. falcatus species are dominant yet in dry Afromontane forests in the era of climate change. Overall, this result is an indicator that J. procera and P. falcatus tree species could be at risk in the long run if they continue with this trend. Therefore, thoughtful adaptation strategies should be designed and applied to dry Afromontane forests of the country to safeguard these conifer species from climate change and further degradation causes. Specifically to P. falcatus, illegal felling of the preferred size of P. falcatus trees should be reduced and/or stopped because the presence of these big trees provides seed source and shed for the seedlings. The predicted suitable area should be set aside for the conservation of coniferous species of Ethiopia and the land use plan should be governed by suitability analysis of the area to climate change.

Furthermore, the effect of climate change on the spatial distribution of J. procera and P. falcatus should be further investigated because there are limited studies. Moreover, the effect of climate change on the soil moisture condition of dry Afromontane forests should be evaluated since the moisture condition of the soil is the critical factor that can determine the occurrence and success of natural regeneration of these species even if there are sufficient seed sources.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this chapter.

References

  1. 1. Gernandt D, Willyard A, Syring J, Liston A. The conifers (Pinophyta). In: Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Conifers. Vol. 2011. St. Helier, Jersey, British Channel Islands: CRC Press; 2011. DOI: 10.1201/b11075-2
  2. 2. Tesema AB. Forest Landscape Restoration Initiatives in Ethiopia. IUCN-EARO and WWF-EARPO. 2002
  3. 3. Asefa M, Cao M, He Y, Mekonnen E, Song X, Yang J. Ethiopian vegetation types, climate and topography. Plant Diversity. 2020;42(4):302-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.04.004
  4. 4. Pohjonen V, Pukkala T. Juniperus procera Hocht. Ex. Endl. in Ethiopian forestry. Forest Ecology and Management. 1992;49(1–2):75-85. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(92)90161-2
  5. 5. Teketay D. Seed and regeneration ecology in dry afromontane forests of Ethiopia: II. Forest disturbances and succession. Tropical Ecology. 2005;46(1):45-64
  6. 6. Hundera K, Bekele T, Kelbessa E. Floristics and phytogeographic synopsis of a dry afromontane coniferous forest in the Bale Mountains (Ethiopia): Implications to biodiversity conservation. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2007;30(1):1-12. DOI: 10.4314/sinet.v30i1.18277
  7. 7. Berihun ML, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, Tsubo M, Yasuda H. Examining the Past 120 Years ’ Climate Dynamics of Ethiopia. Vienna: Springer; 2023
  8. 8. Mekonnen Z, Kassa H, Woldeamanuel T, Asfaw Z. Analysis of observed and perceived climate change and variability in Arsi Negele District, Ethiopia. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2017;20(3):1191-1212. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-017-9934-8
  9. 9. Siyum ZG, Ayoade JO, Onilude MA, Feyissa MT. Analysis of vegetation dynamics and responses to inter-annual changes of climatic variables in dry afromontane forest fragments, Northern Ethiopia. American Journal of Geographic Information System. 2018;2018(5):133-144. DOI: 10.5923/j.ajgis.20180705.02
  10. 10. Hishe H, Oosterlynck L, Giday K, De Keersmaecker W, Somers B, Muys B. A combination of climate, tree diversity and local human disturbance determine the stability of dry afromontane forests. Forest Ecosystems. 2021;8(1):16. DOI: 10.1186/s40663-021-00288-x
  11. 11. Jaeschke A et al. Holocene hydroclimate variability and vegetation response in the Ethiopian highlands (Lake Dendi). Frontiers in Earth Science. 2020;8(December):1-14. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.585770
  12. 12. Masresha G, Melkamu Y. The status of dry evergreen afromontane forest patches in Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2022;2022:8071761. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8071761
  13. 13. Muhammed A, Elias E. The effects of landscape change on plant diversity and structure in the Bale Mountains National Park, southeastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Ecology. 2021;2021:1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6628282
  14. 14. Kibet W. Assessment of Kenya’ s montane forest ecosystems: A case study on the Cherangani Hills in Western Kenya. International Journal of Science Arts and Commerce. 2016;1(9):46-58
  15. 15. Adugna Bayesa A. Impacts of climate change on the forest ecosystems in Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2021;9(6):348. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210906.13
  16. 16. Wauchope HS et al. Evaluating impact using time-series data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2021;36(3):196-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.11.001
  17. 17. Ducklow HW, Doney SC, Steinberg DK. Contributions of long-term research and time-series observations to marine ecology and biogeochemistry. Annual Review of Marine Science. 2009;1:279-302. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163801
  18. 18. Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1974. p. 547
  19. 19. Duchok R, Kent K, Khumbongmayum AD, Paul A, Khan ML. Population structure and regeneration status of medicinal tree Illicium griffithii in relation to disturbance gradients in temperate broad-leaved forest of Arunachal Pradesh. Current Science. 2005;89(4):673-676
  20. 20. Tesfaye G, Teketay D, Fetene M. Regeneration of Fourteen Tree Species in Harena Forest, Southeastern Ethiopia. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2002
  21. 21. Dhaulkhandi M, Dobhal A, Bhatt S, Kumar M. Community structure and regeneration potential of natural forest site in Gangotri, India. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences. 2008;4(1):49-52. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237732681%0ACommunity
  22. 22. Adams RP. Geographic variation in the volatile leaf oils of Juniperus procera Hochst. Ex. Endl. Phytologia. 2013;95(4):269-273
  23. 23. Bussmann RW, Paniagua-zambrana NY, Njoroge GN. Juniperus Procera Hochst. Ex Endl. C. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2021. pp. 619-632
  24. 24. Sterck FJ et al. Juniperus procera (Cupressaceae) in afromontane forests in Ethiopia: From tree growth and population dynamics to sustainable forest use. In: Degraded Forests in Eastern Africa. Vol. January. England & Wales, London: Routledge; 2010. pp. 291-303
  25. 25. Negash L. A Selection of Ethiopia’s Indigenous Trees: Biology, Uses and Propagation Techniques. Vol. June. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University Press; 2010
  26. 26. Khan R, Hill RS, Liu J. Diversity, distribution, systematics and conservation status of Podocarpaceae. Plants. 2023;12(1171):1-53
  27. 27. Teketay D. Natural regeneration and Management of Podocarpus falcatus (Thunb.) Mirb. in the Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. In: Silviculture in the Tropics. London and New York: Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 325-337. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19986-8_21
  28. 28. Negash L. Chapter IV Podocarpus falcatus (Thunb.) Mirb. (Podocarpaceae) (Synonym: Podocarpus gracilior Pilg.). In: A Selection of Ethiopia’s Indigenous Trees: Biology, Uses and Propagation Techniques. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Addis Ababa University Press; 2010
  29. 29. Yineger H, Kelbessa E, Bekele T, Lulekal E. Floristic composition and structure of the dry afromontane forest at Bale Mountains National Park, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2008;31(2):103-120. DOI: 10.4314/sinet.v31i2.66551
  30. 30. Woldemichael L, Bekele T, Nemomissa S. Vegetation composition in Hugumbirda-Gratkhassu National Forest Priority Area, South Tigray. Momona Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2010;2(2):27-48. DOI: 10.4314/mejs.v2i2.57673
  31. 31. Tilahun A. Structure and regeneration status of Menagesha Amba Mariam Forest in central highlands of Shewa, Ethiopia. Advances in Life Science and Technology. 2015;4(4):184. DOI: 10.11648/j.aff.20150404.16
  32. 32. Kebede B, Soromessa T, Kelbessa E. Structure and regeneration status of Gedo dry Evergreen montane Forest, West Shewa zone of Oromia National Regional State, Central Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 2014;3(2):119. DOI: 10.4314/star.v3i2.16
  33. 33. Zegeye H, Teketay D, Kelbessa E. Diversity and regeneration status of woody species in Tara Gedam and Abebaye forests, Northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Forest Research. 2011;22(3):315-328. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-011-0176-6
  34. 34. Fikadu E, Melesse M, Wendawek A. Floristic composition, diversity and vegetation structure of woody plant communities in Boda dry evergreen montane Forest, West Showa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2014;6(5):382-391. DOI: 10.5897/ijbc2014.0703
  35. 35. Gemechu T, Soromessa T, Kelbessa E. Structure and regeneration of Gendo moist montane forest, East Wellega Zone, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science. 2015;5(15):149-168. Available from: www.iiste.org
  36. 36. Yahya N, Gebre B, Tesfaye G. Species diversity, population structure and regeneration status of woody species on Yerer Mountain Forest, central highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Plant Research. 2019;6(2):206-213. DOI: 10.22271/tpr.2019.v6.i2.030
  37. 37. Woldemariam G, Demissew S, Asfaw Z. Woody species composition, diversity and structure of Kumuli dry evergreen afromontane forest in Yem District, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science. 2016;6(3):53-65. Available from: www.iiste.org
  38. 38. Tesfaye MA, Gardi O, Blaser J. Temporal variation in species composition, diversity and regeneration status along altitudinal gradient and slope: The case of Chilimo dry afromontane forest in the central highlands of Ethiopia. World Scientific News. 2019;138:192-224
  39. 39. Shiferaw W, Lemenih M, Gole TWM. Analysis of plant species diversity and forest structure in arero dry afromontane forest of Borena zone, South Ethiopia. Tropical Plant Research. 2018;5(2):129-140. DOI: 10.22271/tpr.2018.v5.i2.018
  40. 40. Reshad M. Woody species richness and diversity at ades dry afromontane forest of south eastern Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2019;7(2):44. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20190702.12
  41. 41. Mesfin W, Zerihun W, Lulekal E. Species diversity, population structure and regeneration status of woody plants in yegof dry afromontane forest Southeastern Ethiopia. European Journal of Advanced Research in Biological and Life Sciences. 2018;6(4):20-34
  42. 42. Mammo S, Kebin Z. Structure and natural regeneration of woody species at central highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment. 2018;10(7):147-158. DOI: 10.5897/jene2018.0683
  43. 43. Koricho HH, Shumi G, Gebreyesus T, Song S, Fufa F. Woody plant species diversity and composition in and around Debre Libanos church forests of north Shoa zone of Oromiya, Ethiopia. Journal of Forest Research. 2020;32(5):1929-1939. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-020-01241-4
  44. 44. Gebeyehu G, Soromessa T, Bekele T, Teketay D. Species composition, stand structure, and regeneration status of tree species in dry afromontane forests of Awi zone, Northwestern Ethiopia. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability. 2019;5(1):199-215. DOI: 10.1080/20964129.2019.1664938
  45. 45. Aynekulu E et al. Plant diversity and regeneration in a disturbed isolated dry afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia. Folia Geobotanica. 2016;51(2):115-127. DOI: 10.1007/s12224-016-9247-y
  46. 46. Mucheye G, Yemata G. Species composition, structure and regeneration status of woody plant species in a dry afromontane forest, Northwestern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2020;6(1):1823607. DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2020.1823607
  47. 47. Atomsa D, Dibbisa D. Floristic composition and vegetation structure of Ades forest, Oromia regional state, West Hararghe zone, Ethiopia. Tropical Plant Research. 2019;6(1):139-147. DOI: 10.22271/tpr.2019.v6.i1.020
  48. 48. Liyew B, Tamrat B, Sebsebe D. Woody species composition and structure of Amoro forest in West Gojjam zone, North Western Ethiopia. Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment. 2018;10(4):53-64. DOI: 10.5897/jene2018.0688
  49. 49. Ayalew A. Floristic composition and vegetation structure of Gatira George’s forest in Habru Woreda in North Wollo, Ethiopia. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture. 2020;3(1):6-16
  50. 50. Dawud S, Sasikumar MCJM. Floristic composition, structural analysis and regeneration status of woody species of natural forest in Gemechis District of west Hararghe zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 2018;8:11-24. DOI: 10.7176/jbah/9-1-07
  51. 51. Teshager Z, Argaw M, Eshete A. Woody species diversity, structure and regeneration status in Weiramba Forest of Amhara region, Ethiopia: Implications of managing forests for biodiversity conservation. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 2018;8(5):16-31. Available from: www.iiste.org
  52. 52. Bekele T, Abebe W. Indigenous woody species regeneration under the canopies of exotic tree plantations at Tore forest, Gelana District, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Biodiversity International Journal. 2018;2(1):1-7. DOI: 10.15406/bij.2018.02.00034
  53. 53. Deressa D, Egigu MC, Sasikumar JM. Population structure and regeneration status of woody plant species in Tulu korma dry afromontane forest, west Shewa zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Scientifica (Cairo). 2023;2023:1-9. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9964663
  54. 54. Bogale Worku B, Birhane Hizkias E, Muhie Dawud S. Diversity, structural, and regeneration analysis of woody species in the afromontane dry forest of Harego, Northeastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2022;2022:40-43. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7475999
  55. 55. Gebirehiwot HT, Kedanu AA, Guangul AA, Adugna MT. Floristic composition, structure, and regeneration status of woody plant species in Hurubu natural forest, North Shewa, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Journal of Landscape Ecology. 2023;16(1):85-104. DOI: 10.2478/jlecol-2023-0005
  56. 56. Ahmed S, Lemessa D, Seyum A. Woody species composition, plant communities, and environmental determinants in Gennemar dry afromontane forest, Southern Ethiopia. Scientifica (Cairo). 2022;2022:1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7970435
  57. 57. Zeleke GS, Tesfaye A, Zeleke FS. Diversity, Structure and Regeneration Status of Woody Species along Altitudinal Gradient of Werganbula Forest at Sude District, Arsi Zone. 2022. Preprint
  58. 58. Kassa GM, Deribie AG, Walle GC. Woody species composition, structure, and regeneration status of gosh-beret dry evergreen forest patch, South Gondar zone, Northeast Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2023;2023:1-16
  59. 59. Amenu BT, Mamo GS, Amamo BA, Doko TT. Woody species structure and regeneration status of Shoti forest, Essera district Dawro zone, SNNPRG, Ethiopia. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 2022;12(2):8-18
  60. 60. Negesse G, Woldearegay M. Floristic diversity, structure and regeneration status of menfeskidus monastery forest in Berehet District, North Shoa, Central Ethiopia. Trees, Forest and People. 2022;7:100191. DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100191
  61. 61. Lemi T, Guday S, Fantaye Y, Eshete A, Hassen N, Źróbek-Sokolnik A. Woody species composition, structure, and diversity of Dindin natural forest, south east of Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2023;2023:1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5338570
  62. 62. Taju M, Alemu A, Teshome E. Diversity, structure and regeneration status of woody species in Juniperus dominated dry afromontane forest of Beyeda district, Northern highlands of Ethiopia. IAEES Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2021;2021(3):103-127. Available from: www.iaees.orgArticlewww.iaees.org
  63. 63. Aliyi NK, Hundera K, Dalle G. Floristic composition, vegetation structure and regeneration status of Kimphe Lafa natural forest, Oromia regional state, West Arsi, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2015;5(1):19-32. DOI: 10.5897/ijbc2018.1241
  64. 64. Bogale T, Datiko D, Belachew S. Structure and natural regeneration status of woody plants of berbere afromontane moist forest, bale zone, south east Ethiopia; implication to biodiversity conservation. Open Journal of Forestry. 2017;7(73021):352-371. DOI: 10.4236/ojf.2017.73021
  65. 65. Nigatu D, Firew K, Mulugeta K. Floristic composition, vegetation structure and regeneration status of Wabero forest, Oromia regional state, southeastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2019;11(9):272-279. DOI: 10.5897/ijbc2018.1241
  66. 66. Belay B, Zewdie S, Mekuria W, Abiyu A, Amare D, Woldemariam T. Woody species diversity and coffee production in remnant semi-natural dry afromontane forest in Zegie peninsula, Ethiopia. Agroforestry Systems. 2018;93(5):1793-1806. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-018-0285-8
  67. 67. Ahmedin A, Eliasb E. Tree species composition, structure and regeneration status in Munessa natural forest, southeastern Ethiopia. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science. 2020;8(1):21-39. DOI: 10.31195/ejejfs.622956
  68. 68. Tura T, Soromessa T, Leta S, Argaw M. Plant community composition and structure of asabot dry afromontane forest, west Harare zone, Ethiopia. Journal of Biodiversity & Endangered Species. 2017;05(04):1-12. DOI: 10.4172/2332-2543.1000202
  69. 69. Balemlay S, Siraj M. Population structure and regeneration status of woody species in Kenech forest, Southwest Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2021;2021:1-14. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6640285
  70. 70. Gurmessa F, Warkineh B, Soromessa T, Demissew S. Vegetation structure and regeneration status of Tulu Lafto Forest, Horo Guduru Wollega zone, West Ethiopia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022;no. January:1-10. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4187623
  71. 71. Friis I, van Breugel P, Weber O, Demissew S. The Western Woodlands of Ethiopia. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters; 2022
  72. 72. Tesfaye G, Teketay D. Distribution of Podocarpus falcatus along environmental gradients and its regeneration status in Harenna forest, Southeastern Ethiopia author for correspondence. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources. 2005;7:118-129
  73. 73. Teketay D. Seedling populations and regeneration of woody species in dry afromontane forests of Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management. 1997;98(2):149-165. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00078-9
  74. 74. Ayalew A, Bekele T, Demissew S. The undifferentiated afromontane forest of Denkoro in the central highland of Ethiopia: A floristic and structural analysis. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science. 2006;29(1):45-56. DOI: 10.4314/sinet.v29i1.18258
  75. 75. Soromessa T, Kelbessa E. Interplay of regeneration, structure and uses of some woody species. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 2014;7522(March):90-100
  76. 76. Soromessa T. Diversity, regeneration, structure and uses of some woody species in Borana forests of southern Ethiopia: The case of Yaballo and Arero forests. Journal of Environment and Earth Science. 2015;5(11):2224-3216
  77. 77. Demie G, Lemenih M, Belliethanthan S. Plant community types, vegetation structure and regeneration status of remnant dry afromontane natural forest patch within debrelibanos monastery, Ethiopia. Open Science Repository Natural Resources and Conservation. 2013;Online, no. open-access:e70081972. DOI: 10.7392/openaccess.70081972
  78. 78. Mohammed S, Abraha B. Floristic composition and structure of Yegof Mountain Forest, South Wollo. Ethiopian Journal of Science and Technology. 2013;6(1):33-45
  79. 79. Atinafe E, Assefa E, Belay B, Endale Y, Seta T. Floristic diversity and natural regeneration status of Entoto Mountain and the surrounding area in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2020;2020:1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2020/4936193
  80. 80. Wami FO, Tolasa T, Zuberi MI. Forest degradation: An assessment of Gedo Forest, West Shewa, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES). 2016;9(October):69-78. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/MI_Zuberi/publication/307575551_Forest_degradation_An_assessment_of_Gedo_Forest_West_Shewa_Oromia_Regional_State_Ethiopia/links/57f35ac308ae91deaa590527/Forest-degradation-An-assessment-of-Gedo-Forest-West-Shewa-Oromia
  81. 81. Abdela A, Tigist T. Woody plant regeneration status of Gamataja community forest, in Goba district, bale zone, Oromia regional state, southeast of Ethiopia. Физиология Человека. 2021;47(10):576-597. DOI: 10.31857/s013116462104007x
  82. 82. Teketay D, Bekele T. Floristic composition of Wof-Washa natural forest, Central Ethiopia: Implications for the conservation of biodiversity Demel. Feddes Repertorium. 1995;106:127-147
  83. 83. Bekele M, Demissew S, Bekele T, Woldeyes F. Soil seed bank distribution and restoration potential in the vegetation of Buska Mountain range, Hamar district, southwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11244. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11244
  84. 84. Enríquez-de-Salamanca Á. Effects of climate change on Forest regeneration in Central Spain. Atmosphere (Basel). 2022;13(7):1-11. DOI: 10.3390/atmos13071143
  85. 85. Tesfaye G, Teketay D, Fetene M, Beck E. Seedling growth and survival of indigenous tree species along a light gradient in a dry afromontane forest. Forest Research and Ecology Policies. 2011;1:89-107
  86. 86. Woldearegay M, Bekele T. Structure, reproductive biology, and regeneration status of Podocarpus falcatus (Thunb.) R. B. Ex Mirb. In Bale Mountains, Southern Ethiopia. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2020;2020:8825780. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8825780
  87. 87. Assefa A, Abate D, Stenlid J. Corynelia uberata as a threat to regeneration of Podocarpus falcatus in Ethiopian forests: Spatial pattern and temporal progress of the disease and germination studies. Plant Pathology. 2015;64(3):617-626. DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12295
  88. 88. Yinebeb M, Lulekal E, Bekele T. Ecological determinants in plant community structure across dry afromontane forest patches of Northwestern Ethiopia. BMC Ecology and Evolution. 2023;23(1):0-13. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-023-02176-0
  89. 89. Hufnagel L, Garamvölgyi Á. Impacts of climate change on vegetation distribution No. 1: Climate change induced vegetation shifts in the palearctic region. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2014;12(2):355-422. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1101_079122
  90. 90. Dakhil MA, Halmy MWA, Hassan WA, El-keblawy A. Endemic Juniperus montane species facing extinction risk under climate change in Southwest China: Integrative approach for conservation assessment and prioritization. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(1):63
  91. 91. Abrha H, Birhane E, Hagos H, Manaye A. Predicting suitable habitats of endangered Juniperus procera tree under climate change in Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2018;37(8):842-853. DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2018.1494000
  92. 92. Sass-Klaassen U, Couralet C, Sahle Y, Sterck FJ. Juniper from Ethiopia contains a large-scale precipitation signal. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2008;169(8):1057-1065. DOI: 10.1086/590473
  93. 93. Warrag EI, Mallick J, Singh RK, Khan RA. “Status of dieback of dieback of Juniperus procera (African pencil cedar) in natural stands and plantation in Alsouda highlands, Saudi Arabia”. Applied Ecology and Environmental Rsearch. 2019;17(2):2325–2338
  94. 94. Aynekulu E, Denich M, Tsegaye D. Regeneration response of Juniperus procera and olea europaea subsp cuspidata to exclosure in a dry afromontane forest in Northern Ethiopia. Mountain Research and Development. 2009;29(2):143-152. DOI: 10.1659/mrd.1076
  95. 95. Asmelash F, Rannestad MM. Challenges and strategy for successful restoration of dry evergreen afromontane forests of Ethiopia. Физиология Человека. 2021;47(4):124-134. DOI: 10.31857/s013116462104007x
  96. 96. Abiem I, Kenfack D, Chapman HM. Assessing the impact of abiotic and biotic factors on seedling survival in an African montane forest. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 2023;6(February):1-11. DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1108257
  97. 97. Al Farsi KAAY, Lupton D, Hitchmough JD, Cameron RWF. How fast can conifers climb mountains? Investigating the effects of a changing climate on the viability of Juniperus seravschanica within the mountains of Oman, and developing a conservation strategy for this tree species. Journal of Arid Environments. 2017;147:40-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.07.020
  98. 98. Twala TC, Fisher JT, Glennon KL. Projecting podocarpaceae response to climate change: We are not out of the woods yet. AoB Plants. 2023;15:1-14. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plad034
  99. 99. Tesfamariam BG, Gessesse B, Melgani F. MaxEnt-based modeling of suitable habitat for rehabilitation of Podocarpus forest at landscape-scale. Environmental Systems Research. 2022;11(1):4. DOI: 10.1186/s40068-022-00248-6
  100. 100. Siyum ZG, Ayoade JO, Onilude MA, Feyissa MT. Climate forcing of tree growth in dry afromontane forest fragments of northern Ethiopia: Evidence from multi-species responses. Forest Ecosystems. 2019;1(7):1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0803-y
  101. 101. Hiltner U, Bräuning A, Gebrekirstos A, Huth A, Fischer R. Impacts of precipitation variability on the dynamics of a dry tropical montane forest. Ecological Modelling. 2016;320:92-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.09.021

Written By

Hana Tamrat Gebirehiwot, Alemayehu Abera Kedanu and Megersa Tafese Adugna

Submitted: 09 October 2023 Reviewed: 18 October 2023 Published: 04 March 2024