Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Bridging the World of Enzymes with Electric Fields

Written By

Arturo Cadena Ramírez, Monserrat Alonso Vargas and Julio Cesar Ríos Guzmán

Submitted: 17 November 2023 Reviewed: 15 December 2023 Published: 22 May 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1004072

From the Edited Volume

Chemical Kinetics and Catalysis - Perspectives, Developments and Applications

Rozina Khattak

Chapter metrics overview

29 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Enzymes are essential proteins in all vital processes such as metabolism, gene expression, cell division, and immune system reactions, among others. They play a significant role in the industry due to their efficient way of catalyzing chemical reactions. The diversity of enzyme actions and applications is attributed to their varying substrate specificities and reaction types. In recent years, various researchers have focused their study proposals on electric fields as a biophysical factor capable of stimulating or inhibiting a biological or catalytic response, although the mechanisms of action are not yet fully resolved. Concurrently, this entails the responsibility to understand the role of the amino acid structure composing enzymes and that of electric fields, offering new insights into the versatility of phenomena associated with catalysis. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a foundational understanding that allows for the comprehension of these phenomena; by providing a perspective that reviews and relates fundamental concepts, with the aim of broadening the scope, we can achieve a better interpretation and more efficient study of this enzyme technology for future research with potential applications.

Keywords

  • electrostatic
  • catalysis
  • enzyme
  • electric fields
  • potential electric

1. Introduction

Enzymes play a crucial role in all stages of metabolism and cellular biochemical reactions. The planet’s biodiversity has underscored the importance of certain enzymes, particularly those of microbial origin, which are extensively used in commercial-scale industrial applications [1]. Since the twentieth century, there have been significant advances in studies related to the isolation, characterization, large-scale production, and bioindustrial applications of enzymes. Their manipulation has been made possible through techniques such as protein engineering, biochemical, metagenomic, and molecular techniques, enhancing the quality and performance of enzymes, thereby expanding their industrial applications [1, 2].

The rapid development of the enzyme industry, as we know it today, has been particularly remarkable over the past four decades, thanks to significant progress in modern biotechnology [3]. This ongoing advancement allows for the full exploitation of enzymes’ potential in various industrial applications.

Enzymatic catalysis has expanded its application field to processes in the pharmaceutical, food, and beverage industries. However, to achieve optimal biocatalytic processes in the energy sector, such as the production of biofuels and natural gas conversion, further improvements in the stability and functionality of biocatalysts are required [4].

The uniqueness of enzyme biological activity lies in the precision of their action, requiring minimal energy to catalyze a specific reaction [5]. Although enzymatic design and manipulation are often approached from the perspectives of pH, substrate concentration, and temperature—crucial factors for catalysis—the exploration of other factors, such as electric fields (EF), has begun.

Electric fields are considered biophysical factors capable of stimulating or inhibiting a biological response by exerting work to move a unit charge from one point to another in a given space. Due to the electrical properties and physicochemical nature of the material exposed to the field, it experiences forces of attraction and repulsion [6]. These fields are essential for the reactivity and selectivity of enzymatic active sites, highlighting electrostatic interactions and their role in enzyme organization. When applied appropriately, they can modify direct chemical interactions, reactivity, and catalysis by manipulating activation energies, which depend on molecule orientation [7, 8, 9, 10].

Enzymatic manipulation from the perspective of electric fields is based on protein composition, whose amino acid residues have a balance of positive and negative charges. The application of electric fields can affect these residues, causing reorientations and changes in catalysis or alterations in active sites. However, the application of electric fields presents challenges related to the lack of standardized measurement techniques for the phenomenon, which hinders the reproducibility of results, a consequence of the complex composition of biological systems [11, 12].

Advertisement

2. The catalytic power of enzymes: a thermodynamic and structural approach

An enzyme is defined as a protein that acts as a biological catalyst, accelerating chemical reactions in living organisms. However, this definition can be ambiguous, making it relevant to link it with thermodynamic terms. In this context, a chemical reaction should be considered in terms of Gibbs free energy (ΔG), which represents the energy available to perform work in a system [13, 14, 15].

In biochemistry, chemical reactions vary according to the value of ΔG: if it is negative, the reaction is exergonic, releasing energy; if positive, it is endergonic, requiring energy. The uniqueness of enzymes lies in that they do not alter the ΔG of a reaction, but rather reduce the activation energy, that is, the energy barrier that substrates must overcome to reach the transition state and become products (Eq. (1)) [13, 14, 15].

EnzymeSubstrateProductE1

In this way, enzymes optimize reactions by reducing the activation energy, allowing them to occur at much higher speeds than a chemical or physical catalyst. In other words, enzymes do not alter the thermodynamic direction of a reaction, but they enable and accelerate the process by making the transition of states from substrates to products more accessible [16].

However, the extraordinary power of enzymes is attributed to their chemical composition, that is, the sequence of amino acids, arrangement of atoms, chemical groups, as well as weak interactions like hydrogen bonds, ionic forces, and Van der Waals forces, among others [17].

All these components are distributed in such a way that they form a specific three-dimensional structure, capable of carrying out its catalytic function by efficiently interacting with the substrates. This task occurs in the active site, a specific region where catalysis takes place. The conformation of this site is crucial for the specificity of the substrate and the enzyme, as it determines the molecules that can bind and interact during catalysis [17].

The conformation of an enzyme can change in response to various stimuli such as changes in pH, temperature, presence of cofactors, and substrate concentration [16]. Recently, the use of electric fields has been explored as an additional variable capable of inducing changes in the enzyme structure, as well as the factors mentioned above. Understanding the underlying principles of this emerging variable is vital for advancing the study of enzymes and the effects derived from their exposure to this factor.

In this context, the relationship between electric fields (EF) and enzymes is not a novel topic. Evidence has been accumulating that links the catalytic ability of enzymes with electrostatic interactions [18, 19, 20]. This contrasts with Pauling’s hypothesis [21], which attributes such catalytic power to a reduction in the activation barrier, resulting from changes in conformational strain during the progression of the reaction. Furthermore, it has been observed that enzymes possess an intrinsic EF within their three-dimensional structure, and when interacting with an external field of different intensity, they modify their behavior, which is precisely what will be explored.

Advertisement

3. Exploring the interactions between electric fields and biology: from fundamental principles to applications in biological systems

An electric field (EF) is defined as a force field generated by electric charges. The response in the electric field varies depending on the nature of the material (its polarization capacity) and the inherent or acquired surface charges [22]. Additionally, it can be conceived as a vector field, where forces of attraction and repulsion are exerted [6]. This fundamental concept dates back to Benjamin Franklin’s discovery, who observed that like charges repel each other while opposite charges attract [23]. Coulomb’s Law (Eq. (2)) [24] is a quantitative relationship between two point charges and the space surrounding them, describing the force they generate, which is also fundamental in the study of electrostatic phenomena at different levels. Thus, the EF is grounded in fundamental principles of electrostatics, enabling the understanding and prediction of electrical interactions between charges.

F=Kq1q2r2E2

where,

q1 y q2 = magnitude of charges in coulomb (C).

r2 = distance separating the charges in meters (m).

F = force of attraction or repulsion in Newtons (N).

The force of attraction or repulsion between molecules is intrinsically linked to the distance between the charged particles, being inversely proportional to the distance separating them [24, 25]. This phenomenon leads to two types of behavior: conductors and insulators. Biological systems, characterized by their versatility, can exhibit both properties, classifying as semiconductors, as they contain charges capable of moving [11].

In biological materials, the distribution of charges tends to be homogeneous; however, in exceptional cases, they may concentrate in specific regions within a molecule, creating a charge separation or polarization [11].

The application of an EF to a molecule entails significant changes in its charge distribution, which can result in the breaking or formation of bonds that affect or favor the generation of products. A detailed understanding of this process could be achieved by characterizing the fundamental electronic state of the species involved in the reaction [26].

In this regard, it connects with the electrostatic property of biological systems, such as enzymes. This characteristic refers to the interaction between charge densities and their distributions, which can be permanent or induced, encompassing permanent or induced dipoles, as well as solvation effects, hydrogen bonds, and hydrophobic forces, analyzed from an electrostatic perspective. In this context, distributions tend to distort to adapt to a new environment, achieving once again an electrostatic preorganization. Thus, the effect of the enzymatic environment on the reaction’s evolution is considered as an electrostatic potential associated with an EF. This EF will dictate the temporal evolution of the system’s charge distributions, suggesting to induce an interaction energy in a substrate proportional to its dipole, in accordance with the physics convention that indicates the orientation of dipoles toward positive charges [26].

As an example in aqueous environments, like biological ones, ions (Na+, Ca2+, K+, and Cl) interact with the EF. We also find this in proteins, composed of amino acids with ionizable groups, polar, and side chains. In a typical biological environment with pH 7.4, eight amino acids act as hydrophobic and non-polar, adopting dipole characteristics. Under similar pH conditions, seven amino acids are hydrophilic and polar, capable of acquiring a charge or behaving ionically. Two amino acids have a negative charge and three, a positive one. In summary, the net charge and polarity of a protein depend on its distribution, which is intrinsically related to its sequence and, in turn, to the pH [24, 25].

Other biological molecules, such as nucleic acids, vitamins, lipids, and cofactors, which possess a net charge, are also influenced by electric fields [11, 25, 26, 27].

Under physiological conditions, proteins, enzymes, and peptides generally adopt their native conformation, thereby favoring their biological functions. However, exogenous factors can disturb this balance, triggering a transition to denatured states. Research based on molecular dynamics simulations has revealed that agents like electric fields (EF) can induce conformational changes in enzymes, even affecting their denaturation and stability [28, 29]. Biologically, it is not possible to find an EF in its traditional definition and representation, but rather in a relatively more abstract form where electrochemical phenomena manifest as transmembrane potentials derived from ionic exchange.

It is well known that any system with mobile charges, when exposed to an electric field, generates an electric potential. This potential is the result of electron flow in metallic conductors or ions in electrolytes. The point where this exchange occurs is known as the electrode (see Figure 1) [11].

Figure 1.

General schematic of an electrobio-reactor.

In Figure 1, the direction of ion movement in relation to the current and the electric field (EF) is observed. It is crucial to highlight that the current flow is oriented in a positive direction, a significant clarification since metals carry a negative charge, whereas electrolytic solutions contain both positive and negative charges. When an accumulation of electrons occurs in the metallic conductor at the left electrode, a negative charge is generated on the surface, favoring the attraction of positive ions (cations), which is why it is called the cathode. Conversely, at the anode, the attraction of anions is due to the lack of electrons, creating a positive charge.

This process implies that anions donate an electron to the anode, while cations head toward the cathode, leading to an exchange of charges. However, this exchange is not so simple, because many ions do not easily give up their electrons, attributable to their electronegativity [11].

Moreover, an ion barrier known as the ‘electrical double layer’ or insulating barrier is formed. This barrier originates from a coating of water that covers the electrode in an aqueous environment, due to the polar nature of water and the excess charge on the electrode surface, requiring more energy to complete the exchange of molecules [11, 30].

This situation, termed overpotential of energy, is essential for overcoming the electrochemical reaction at the electrode-aqueous medium interface [31]. At this point, two types of reactions can be distinguished to accomplish the exchange: the first occurs when the electrode acts as an inert electron, i.e., chemically inactive, and the second occurs if the electrode acts as a donor/acceptor of ions, i.e., chemically active [11].

This is where redox reactions become significant, as they facilitate charge transfer through the reduction and oxidation of ions at the cathode and anode, respectively. Additionally, water decomposition mechanisms can occur at any electrode, a phenomenon known as electrolysis [11].

For instance, in a covalent solution like water, which contains few ions, a current can be generated by adding a diluted acid or a salt like NaCl, which provides enough ions to conduct the current. However, when using H2SO4, which contains H+ ions and (SO4), the hydrogen ions are attracted to the cathode, where they collect electrons, forming a gas molecule. At the anode, the negative sulfate ions are attracted, undergoing neutralization and reacting with water to produce more H2SO4 and release O2 [32].

It is crucial to emphasize that the presence of electrolysis during the application of EFs is not always desirable, as it can generate toxic byproducts for a biological system [33]. One way to prevent this phenomenon is to create a barrier that inhibits the diffusion of byproducts, allowing the flow of ionic current [11]. Understanding the nature of the electrodes to be used, as well as the composition of the fluids involved, is one of the alternatives for achieving this.

Another critical aspect is the manner in which the EFs are applied, as variations in magnitude and direction can have a substantial effect on the rate of enzymatic reactions. The application of EFs above 0.1 V can alter the energies of molecular orbitals, modifying the activation barriers of reactions and the kinetic parameters associated with catalysis. Working with lower field intensities allows the molecules to remain intact but oriented and polarized according to their dipole moment and polarization [34].

Advertisement

4. Applications of electric fields in enzymes

In the field of enzymes, research since the 1970s has laid the groundwork for a more quantitative than qualitative application of electric fields [15, 19]. Phenomena triggered by exposure to these fields affect the spectroscopy of molecules (Stark effect), promote electron transfer and redox reactions. They also induce polarized spin conductivity, alterations in molecular geometry, isomerization of molecules, and even spin-crossover transitions in Fe (II) complexes, acting as molecular switches [35].

In 1997, Armstrong and colleagues developed a voltammetric technique called Protein Film Voltammetry (PFV), primarily aimed at studying the behavior of complex metalloproteins. This technique involves the adsorption of the protein onto an electrode to which an electric potential is applied, and the flow of electrons between the electrode and the active site is monitored, measured as current consumption (essentially similar to cyclic voltammetry). Thanks to this technique, important thermodynamic and kinetic information has been obtained on various proteins (cytochrome P450, catalases, cytochrome c nitrite reductase, hemoglobin, etc.), enabling a greater understanding of their mechanisms of action [36, 37].

In recent decades, researchers have actively explored the use of electric fields in various applications, spanning fields as diverse as health and biology, such as in cancer treatment and cell sorting, as well as in engineering and technological applications, where the aim is to improve heat transfer, study colloidal hydrodynamics, and address stability issues [22]. Thanks to technological advances and the development of tools that allow for more complex and specific techniques, the field of electrochemistry has become actively involved in the study of protein models [38]. Among them, nano-impact electrochemistry (NIE) stands out, through which more in-depth study of mechanisms such as electron transfer has been achieved [38, 39]. Since electron transfer is a crucial process in biochemical reactions, special emphasis has been placed on its study. Perhaps, one of the most relevant in the biological field is the relationship between conductance capacity and secondary structure [38, 40, 41].

In addition to the electroporation of cell membranes, the electrostimulation of cellular metabolism through electric or electromagnetic fields has become a valuable tool in non-invasive processes to stimulate living organisms. These processes include organism proliferation, enzymatic reactions, biopolymer synthesis, morphological changes, membrane transport phenomena [42, 43], and bone tissue regeneration [44].

It is important to note that these effects are conditioned by factors such as exposure time, intensity of the applied current, distance between the electrodes, among others [6, 45]. Most studies have focused on chemical catalysis and computational simulations, largely overlooking enzymatic aspects. Among the pioneer researchers, Fried et al. [20] have explored the Stark vibrational effect, which involves the spectral shift of atoms and molecules in the presence of an electric field (EF). This approach allows measuring the EF experienced by the substrate when it binds to the active site, thus supporting the importance of electrostatic contribution in enzymatic catalysis [46].

Furthermore, using Stark spectroscopic vibration, Fried et al. [20] identified that the active site of the enzyme ketosteroid isomerase (KSI) presents an EF that stabilizes the C=O bond dipole, orienting it toward the transition state, correlating with an improvement in the catalytic rate.

Computational studies of the enzyme cytochrome P450, present in the bacterium Jeotgalicoccus sp. ATCC 8456, have used a software called ‘elecTric fIeld generaTion And maNipulation (TITAN).’ This software aids in generating uniform and non-uniform electric fields and quantifying local electric fields present in proteins and other biomolecules. This approach has allowed exploring the effects and evolution of electric fields in biological systems. In particular, the study focused on the hydrogen transfer reaction of the P450 enzyme and its modifications induced by the application of an externally oriented EF. The main impact was observed on the Fe-O bond [47]. In a simulation by Lai et al. [48], it was demonstrated that an external EF has the capability to control the activation of the enzyme’s catalytic activity, its O2 consumption, its resting state geometry, and the spin state arrangement, thus highlighting the relevance of electric fields in enzymatic processes.

While some researchers have applied EF as a means of enzymatic stimulation, the mechanism is not yet fully elucidated. It is primarily attributed to structural changes, but it has also been studied that transmembrane enzymes, such as ATPase, can harness the free energy from the EF to modify their catalysis, although this depends more on the characteristics of the EF than on the enzyme [49]. This leads to the so-called ‘electrogenic enzymes,’ of which ATP synthase is probably the most representative. In this enzymatic complex, the exchange of Na+ and K+ ions has been well defined for several decades [50]; however, based on this premise, the electrochemical implications in protein and cellular systems were studied more deeply, leading to the description of another factor known as ‘electrochemical homeostasis’ or ‘ionic homeostasis,’ which in turn led to the description of mechanisms of ionic exchange regulated by electromotive forces, where transmembrane proteins are of primary importance [51].

It should be noted that the opposite effect can occur, namely, the denaturation of enzymes, resulting from the association or dissociation of functional protein residues, inducing charge separation (induced dipole) [25, 52]. Although the process of enzymatic inactivation is better characterized compared to stimulation, it is presumed that this phenomenon may be due to the additional formation of active sites or their modification, reducing the activation energy of the reaction. This may be related to the induction of a favorable orientation of the substrate and the enzyme. Therefore, it is crucial to continue research in this area to understand and establish the real contribution of electric fields [25].

While enzymes have been classified according to their biochemical function and all share essential thermodynamic parameters (optimal pH and temperature, activation energy, pKa, redox state, etc.), oxidoreductases, especially those involved in respiratory processes, stand out among others due to the electrochemical potential, which adds as an additional factor [35, 53].

Due to this electrochemical nature, the active sites of these enzymes can be presented in three defined states as oxidized (O), intermediate (I), or reduced (R), where each state then has different properties and therefore can lead to different metabolic pathways [53], where the response will depend on the existence of additional electron transport centers (e.g., heme groups or Fe-S) [54].

In 1984, Serpesu and Tsong [55] used a solution of blood cells to study the effect of imposing an EF on the activity of (Na,K)ATPase; the results obtained from this work showed that protein modifications resulted from changes in the flow of Na+, K+, and Rb + ions as well as the addition of compounds that showed to inhibit or favor ionic exchange under the study conditions.

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

Electric fields are a phenomenon commonly associated exclusively with physical aspects and, due to their traditional definition and representation, are seldom linked to biological processes; however, it has been established that electric fields, and therefore electric potential, are parameters implicitly involved in enzymatic processes.

Nevertheless, the manipulation of enzymes through EFs still presents several challenges due to the rigorous conditions necessary for their study; this is why many works within this field employ bacterial models in specific processes, where the results are associated with enzymatic processes. However, this has not been a limitation for studying in depth the effect and relationship that EFs have with enzymes. While concrete observations of the implications at the structural and/or conformational level have not yet been achieved, contemporary tools and methods allow for a more precise approach. Combined with decades of research, it is possible to conclusively assert that electric fields are a physicochemical factor of utmost importance for enzymatic processes and a useful tool in optimizing these processes, which are extremely attractive for various industries.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the National Council of Humanities, Sciences, and Technologies (CONAHCYT) for granting scholarships for the pursuit of master’s and doctoral degrees at the Polytechnic University of Pachuca, as well as for their support in the Frontier Science Project 2019, grant number 58540.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Nigam PS. Microbial enzymes with special characteristics for biotechnological applications. Biomolecules. 2013;3(3):597-611. DOI: 10.3390/biom3030597
  2. 2. Chirumamilla RR, Muralidhar R, Marchant R, Nigam P. Improving the quality of industrially important enzymes by directed evolution. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2001;224:159-168. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011904405002
  3. 3. Kirk O, Borchert TV, Fuglsang CC. Industrial enzyme applications. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2002;13(4):345-351. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00328-2
  4. 4. Chapman J, Ismail AE, Dinu CZ. Industrial applications of enzymes: Recent advances, techniques, and outlooks. Catalysts. 2018;8(6):238-264. DOI: 10.3390/catal8060238
  5. 5. Ali S, Khan SA, Hamayun M, Lee IJ. The recent advances in the utility of microbial lipases: A review. Microorganisms. 2023;11(2):510-536. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020510
  6. 6. Pataro G, Ferrari G, Donsì F. Mass transfer enhancement by means of electroporation. In: Markoš J, editor. Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes. Vol. 8. London: IntechOpen; 2011. pp. 151-176. DOI: 10.5772/22386
  7. 7. Fried SD, Boxer SG. Electric fields and enzyme catalysis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2017;86:387-415. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044432
  8. 8. Hanoian P, Liu CT, Hammes-Schiffer S, Benkovic S. Perspectives on electrostatics and conformational motions in enzyme catalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2015;48(2):482-489. DOI: 10.1021/ar500390e
  9. 9. Liu CT, Layfield JP, Stewart RJ, French JB, Hanoian P, Asbury JB, et al. Probing the electrostatics of active site microenvironments along the catalytic cycle for Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136(29):10349-10360. DOI: 10.1021/ja5038947
  10. 10. Wu Y, Fried SD, Boxer SG. A preorganized electric field leads to minimal geometrical reorientation in the catalytic reaction of ketosteroid isomerase. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2020;142(22):9993-9998. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c00383
  11. 11. Colello RJ, Alexander JK. Electrical fields: Their nature and influence on biological systems. In: Morkoç H, editor. Advanced Semiconductor and Organic Nano-Techniques. Virginia: Elsevier; 2003. pp. 319-346. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012507060
  12. 12. Lewczuk B, Redlarski G, Zak A, Ziółkowska N, Przybylska-Gornowicz B, Krawczuk M. Influence of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields on the circadian system: Current stage of knowledge. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:1-13. DOI: 10.1155/2014/169459
  13. 13. Aledo JC, Medina MÁ. Thermodynamics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. In: Singh RS, Singhania RS, Larroche C, editors. Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals: Advances in Enzyme Catalysis and Technologies. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 105-135. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-64114-4.00004-2
  14. 14. Liu S. Chapter 7-enzymes. In: Liu S, editor. Bioprocess Engineering. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 297-373. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63783-3.00007-1
  15. 15. Warshel A, Sharma PK, Kato M, Xiang Y, Liu H, Olsson MHM. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chemical Reviews. 2006;106(8):3210-3235. DOI: 10.1021/cr0503106
  16. 16. Grahame DAS, Bryksa BC, Yada RY. Chapter 2-factors affecting enzyme activity. In: Yada RYY, editor. Technology and Nutrition, Improving and Tailoring Enzymes for Food Quality and Functionality. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2015. pp. 11-55. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-285-3.00002-8
  17. 17. Roskoski R. Enzyme structure and function. In: Caplan M, editor. References Module in Biomedical Sciences. North Carolina: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.05007-8
  18. 18. Stark J. Observation of the separation of spectral lines by an electric field. Nature. 1913;92:40. DOI: 10.1038/092401b0
  19. 19. Warshel A. Electrostatic basis of structure-function correlation in proteins. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1981;14(2):284-290. DOI: 10.1021/ar00069a004
  20. 20. Fried SD, Bagchi S, Boxer SG. Extreme electric fields power catalysis in the active site of ketosteroid isomerase. Science. 2014;346(6216):1510-1514. DOI: 10.1126/science.1259802
  21. 21. Pauling L. Molecular architecture and biological reactions. Chemical and Engineering News. 1946;24:1375-1377. DOI: 10.1021/cen-v024n010.p1375
  22. 22. Kandelousi MS. Electric Field. 1st ed. London, UK, London, UK: InTech; 2018. 322 p. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69824
  23. 23. Home RW. Franklin’s electrical atmospheres. BJHS. 1972;6(2):131-151. DOI: 10.1017/S0007087400012255
  24. 24. Ida N. Coulomb’s law and the electric field. In: Ida N, editor. Engineering Electromagnetics. Akron: Springer; 2000. pp. 95-137. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07806-9_3
  25. 25. Zhou HX, Pang X. Electrostatic interactions in protein structure, folding, binding, and condensation. Chemical Reviews. 2018;118:1691-1741. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00305
  26. 26. Vaissier-Welborn V. Electric fields in enzyme catalysis. In: Yáñez M, Boyd RJ, editors. Comprehensive Computational Chemistry. Canada: Elsevier; 2024. pp. 755-766. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821978-2.00018-0
  27. 27. Ren P, Chun J, Thomas DG, Schnieders MJ, Marucho M, Zhang J, et al. Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: A computational perspective. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 2012;45(4):427-491. DOI: 10.1017/S003358351200011X
  28. 28. Budi A, Legge FS, Treutlein H, Yarovsky I. Electric field effects on insulin chain-B conformation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 2005;109(47):22641-22648. DOI: 10.1021/jp052742q
  29. 29. English NJ, Solomentsev GY, O’Brien P. Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics study of electric and low-frequency microwave fields on hen egg white lysozyme. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 2009;131:3. DOI: 10.1063/1.3184794
  30. 30. Gonella G, Backus EHG, Nagata Y, Bonthuis DJ, Loche P, Schlaich A, et al. Water at charged interfaces. Nature Reviews Chemistry. 2021;5(7):1-20. DOI: 10.1038/s41570-021-00293-2
  31. 31. Eberhard N. Elementary analysis of chemical electric field effects in biological macromolecules. In: Gutmann F, Keyzer H, editors. Modern Bioelectrochemistry. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 1986. pp. 97-132. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2105-7_4
  32. 32. Chang H, Duncan K, Kim K, Paik SH. Electrolysis: What textbooks don’t tell us. CERP. 2020;21(3):806-822. DOI: 10.1039/c9rp00218a
  33. 33. Jasper JT, Yang Y, Hoffmann MR. Toxic byproduct formation during electrochemical treatment of latrine wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology. 2017;51(12):1-34. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01002
  34. 34. Shaik S, Ramanan R, Danovich D, Mandal D. Structure and reactivity/selectivity control by oriented-external electric fields. Chemical Society Reviews. 2018;47(14):5125-5145. DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00354h
  35. 35. Léonard NG, Dhaoui R, Chantarojsiri T, Yang JY. Electric fields in catalysis: From enzymes to molecular catalysts. ACS Catalysis. 2021;11(17):10923-10932. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02084
  36. 36. Armstrong FA, Heering HA, Hirst J. Reaction of complex metalloproteins studied by protein-film voltammetry. Chemical Society Reviews. 1997;26(3):169-179. DOI: 10.1039/CS9972600169
  37. 37. Gulaboski R, Mirceski V, Bogeski I, Hoth M. Protein film voltammetry: Electrochemical enzymatic spectroscopy. A review on recent progress. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. 2012;16:2315-2318. DOI: 10.1007/s10008-011-1397-5
  38. 38. Davis C, Wang SX, Sepunaru L. What can electrochemistry tell us about individual enzymes? Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2021;25:100643. DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100643
  39. 39. Han L, Wang W, Nsabimana J, Yan J, Ren B, Zhan D. Single molecular catalysis of a redox enzyme on nanoelectrodes. Faraday Discussions. 2016;193:133-139. DOI: 10.1039/C6FD00061D
  40. 40. Zhang XY, Shao J, Jiang SX, Wang B, Zheng Y. Structure-dependent electrical conductivity of protein: Its differences between alpha-domain and beta-domain structures. Journal of Nanotechnology. 2015;26(12):125702. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/12/125702
  41. 41. Yu J, Chen Y, Xiong L, Zhang X, Zheng Y. Conductance changes in bovine serum albumin caused by drug-binding triggered structural transitions. Materials. 2019;12(7):1022. DOI: 10.3390/ma12071022
  42. 42. Berg H. Possibilities and problems of low frequency weak electromagnetic fields in cell biology. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics. 1995;38(1):153-159. DOI: 10.1016/0302-4598(95)01831-X
  43. 43. Berg H. Electrostimulation of cell metabolism by low frequency electric and electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics. 1993;31(1):1-25. DOI: 10.1016/0302-4598(93)86102-7
  44. 44. Tsong TY. Electrical modulation of membrane proteins: Enforced conformational oscillations and biological energy and signal transductions. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry. 1990;19:83-89. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.000503
  45. 45. Beach F. British electricity international. Electrical system analysis. In: Litter DJ, editor. Electrical Systems and Equipment: Incorporating Modern Power System Practice. 3rd ed. United Kingdom: Pergamon Press; 2014. pp. 84-192. ISBN: 978-0080405148
  46. 46. Boxer SG, Lockhart DJ, Middendorf TR. Photochemical Holeburning and Stark spectroscopy of photosynthetic reaction centers. In: Kobayashi T, editor. Springer Proceedings in Physics. Vol. 20. Berlin; 1987. pp. 80-90. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72835-8_9
  47. 47. Stuyver T, Huang J, Mallick D, Danovich D, Shaik S. TITAN: A code for Modeling and generating electric fields—Features and applications to enzymatic reactivity. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2020;41(1):74-82. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26072
  48. 48. Lai W, Chen H, Cho K, Bin SS. External electric field can control the catalytic cycle of cytochrome P450cam: A QM/MM study. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2010;14:2082-2087. DOI: 10.1021/jz100695n
  49. 49. Westerhoff HV, Tsongt Y, Chocks PB, Chen YD, Astumiant RD. How enzymes can capture and transmit free energy from an oscillating electric field. Biophysics. 1986;83:4734-4738. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.13.4734
  50. 50. Hernández J, Fischbarg J, Liebovitch LS. Kinetic model of the effects of electrogenic enzymes on the membrane potential. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1983;137(1):113-125. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80153-5
  51. 51. Mehta AR, Huang CLH, Skepper JN, Fraser JA. Extracellular charge adsorption influences intracellular electrochemical homeostasis in amphibian skeletal muscle. Biophysical Journal. 2008;94(11):4549-4560. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.128587
  52. 52. Poojary MM, Roohinejad S, Koubaa M, Barba FJ, Passamonti P, Režek JA, et al. Impact of pulsed electric fields on enzymes. In: Miklavčič D, editor. Handbook of Electroporation. Vol. 4. Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 2369-2389. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7_173
  53. 53. Elliot SJ, Léger C, Pershad HR, Hirst J, Heffron K, Ginet N, et al. Detection and interpretation of redox potential optima in the catalytic activity of enzymes. Biochimica et Biophysica acta – BBA. Bioenergetics. 2002;1555(1-3):54-59. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-2728(02)00254-2
  54. 54. Craig EA, Marszalek J. A specialized mitochondrial molecular chaperon system: A role in formation of Fe/S centers. CMLS. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2002;59:1658-1665. DOI: 10.1007/PL00012493
  55. 55. Serpesu EH, Tsong TY. Activation of electrogenic Rb+ transport of (Na,K)-ATPase by an electric field. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1984;11(10):7155-7162. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)39851-4

Written By

Arturo Cadena Ramírez, Monserrat Alonso Vargas and Julio Cesar Ríos Guzmán

Submitted: 17 November 2023 Reviewed: 15 December 2023 Published: 22 May 2024