Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Bridging the Gap: Understanding and Fostering Intergenerational Communication in the Digital Age

Written By

Roy Rillera Marzo

Submitted: 09 August 2023 Reviewed: 09 September 2023 Published: 22 May 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1003205

From the Edited Volume

Intergenerational Relations - Contemporary Theories, Studies and Policies

Andrzej Klimczuk

Chapter metrics overview

70 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This chapter delves into the promotion of digital literacy and the challenge of bridging the intergenerational digital divide in our tech-driven age. Digital literacy, extending beyond technological skill, encompasses ethical considerations and digital citizenship, crucial for participation in today’s digital society. While various global initiatives, like Singapore’s Silver Infocomm Initiative and the European Commission’s Digital Skills and Jobs Coalition, strive to foster digital literacy across generations, family plays a central role in intergenerational learning. The significance of formal education in equipping digital natives is underscored, suggesting an integration of digital literacy into curricula and innovative teaching methods. The chapter scrutinizes the influence of societal norms and policies on technology acceptance and utilization. Upcoming trends, including the growing digital participation of the elderly and breakthroughs in VR, AR, MR, AI, and IoT, are discussed. However, potential pitfalls like widening digital disparities in marginalized communities and issues of privacy and ethics are acknowledged. The chapter concludes with insights into the present landscape of intergenerational digital communication, stressing the imperative of continuous efforts, through education, policy, and community engagement, to make technology a tool for empowerment and inclusivity.

Keywords

  • digital literacy
  • intergenerational communication
  • digital divide
  • artificial intelligence
  • virtual and augmented reality
  • Internet of Things
  • lifelong learning
  • family engagement

1. Introduction

The generational gap, often referred to as the generation gap, signifies the differences in experiences, attitudes, and behaviors among different generations. This phenomenon not only impacts familial relationships but also deeply influences the workplace and broader societal interactions [1].

A foundational understanding of this gap requires an exploration of the unique characteristics that define each generation. Scholars, over time, have segmented individuals based on their birth years, resulting in categories such as the silent generation, baby boomers, generation X, millennials, and generation Z [2]. The sociocultural, economic, and technological landscapes that each generation has grown up in have greatly influenced their worldviews and behaviors. For instance, while baby boomers grew up during a period marked by remarkable economic growth and societal shifts, the millennial experience is largely characterized by the rise and ubiquity of the internet and digital technology [3].

A notable manifestation of the generational gap is the intergenerational communication difference. The varied communication styles, perceptions of societal norms, and unique generational expectations contribute to this distinction. Older generations, having grown up in a pre-digital age, often exhibit a preference for face-to-face or written communication. The younger cohorts, immersed in the digital age since their formative years, lean toward electronic forms of communication. This divergence in communication styles can sometimes result in misinterpretations and misunderstandings [4].

Further amplifying these differences is the rapid evolution of technology. In just a few decades, technological strides have reshaped the way we communicate, interact, and perceive the world. This transformation has led to the widening of the generational gap. The younger generations, having been exposed to technology throughout their lives, navigate the digital realm seamlessly, whereas older generations often find the digital terrain somewhat more challenging [5, 6].

To delve deeper into this realm and offer insights into the complexities of intergenerational digital communication, this study has set forth specific research questions and hypotheses:

Research questions:

  1. RQ1: How have the digital habits and preferences of different generations evolved over the last decade?

  2. RQ2: What barriers currently impede effective intergenerational digital communication?

  3. RQ3: What strategies and interventions have proven effective in bridging the intergenerational digital divide?

  4. RQ4: How do families, education systems, and society at large influence the state of intergenerational digital communication?

  5. RQ5: What are the future trends shaping the landscape of intergenerational digital communication?

Hypotheses:

  1. H1: Younger generations, having grown up in the digital age, exhibit a higher proficiency and comfort level with digital technologies compared to older generations.

  2. H2: Generational stereotypes contribute significantly to miscommunication and misunderstandings in the digital realm.

  3. H3: Interventions promoting mutual learning and empathy are effective in improving intergenerational digital communication.

  4. H4: Families play a pivotal role in fostering digital literacy across generations.

  5. H5: The integration of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR), will redefine intergenerational digital interactions in the coming decade.

Guided by this background, the primary objectives of this study are to investigate the influence of technological advancements on intergenerational communication, examine the generational gap’s ramifications in workplace settings, and evaluate potential strategies that could bridge the communication disparities. This research holds importance as it aims to promote enhanced understanding and collaboration across different generational divides, especially within the professional arena.

Advertisement

2. Conceptual framework

For the older adults, the cycle begins with the physical challenges that often accompany aging, such as reduced mobility and health complications. These challenges frequently lead to emotional isolation, particularly when compounded by an aversion or lack of access to digital technology, which is increasingly central to social interaction today. This cycle of physical and emotional isolation perpetuates a feeling of disconnection and vulnerability among the older adults, limiting their engagement with younger generations.

Concurrently, young people are experiencing their own cycle of weakness rooted in emotional limitations and a state of relative inexperience. While they may be adept at using digital technology, their dependence on it often interferes with time spent on interpersonal communications, especially with older, more experienced individuals. This undermines their ability to develop essential social intelligence skills, thereby perpetuating their cycle of weakness.

The confluence of these cycles creates a relational gap between the older adults and the youth, manifesting as a lack of understanding and meaningful interaction between the two groups. Your project aims to bridge this gap through targeted encounters that foster both social support for the older adults and social intelligence in the youth. These encounters are designed to break the cycles of weakness and to create a positive feedback loop; as social support for the older adults and social intelligence in the young increase, it is expected to generate momentum toward future encounters. Over time, this has the potential not only to lessen the relational gap but also to sustain social support and enhance social intelligence, thereby enriching the lives of both the older adults and the young.

This process is represented in the model shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Social integration model for the older adults-youth project of St. Paul University Manila.

Advertisement

3. Methodological approach

To ensure a comprehensive understanding of the generational gap and its implications, this research employs a mixed-method approach. While the foundation is laid upon an extensive literature review, selected case studies have been incorporated to provide real-world context and deepen the insights.

3.1 Literature review process

3.1.1 Data sources

The primary sources for our literature review include academic databases such as JSTOR, Google Scholar, and PubMed. These platforms were chosen due to their extensive coverage of peer-reviewed articles, journals, and studies pertinent to our research questions.

3.1.2 Search criteria

Articles were shortlisted based on keywords and phrases such as “generational gap,” “intergenerational communication,” “technology and generational differences,” “workplace dynamics across generations,” and “bridging communication gaps.” Any literature published between 1990 and 2023 was considered to ensure the incorporation of historical context and recent developments.

3.1.3 Selection criteria

From the initial search results, articles were further filtered based on their relevance to our research questions, the credibility of the sources, and the depth of the study. Any literature that provided unique insights or divergent perspectives was prioritized.

3.2 Selection and justification of case studies

3.2.1 Purpose of case studies

Case studies were incorporated to provide a tangible understanding of the generational gap and its real-world implications. These studies offer deeper insights, highlighting both challenges and potential solutions in bridging generational differences.

3.2.2 Criteria for selection

Case studies were chosen based on their relevance to our research questions, the diversity of the scenarios they presented (e.g., different industries, cultural contexts, or technological scenarios), and their depth of analysis.

3.2.3 Source of case studies

Selected case studies have been sourced from reputable business journals, industry reports, and academic publications, ensuring their credibility and relevance.

3.3 Assessment of methodological sufficiency

Given the extensive nature of our literature review and the deliberate selection of diverse case studies, we believe that our methods are robust enough to address the research questions. The literature provides the theoretical foundation, while the case studies offer practical insights, making for a comprehensive approach to the research.

3.4 Limitations

While our methods have been designed for thoroughness, there are inherent limitations. The dynamic nature of technology and societal behaviors implies that the generational gap is continuously evolving. Moreover, case studies, by their nature, offer specific scenarios that might not be universally applicable. However, by combining a wide range of literature with diverse case studies, we aim to provide a holistic view of the topic at hand.

Advertisement

4. Digital landscape: unraveling its impact on intergenerational communication

Over the last several decades, the digital landscape has significantly morphed, influencing both the channels and methods by which various generations communicate. As the virtual world continues to grow and change, distinct generational experiences with these transformations lead to both convergences and divergences in communicative styles and preferences.

4.1 The renaissance of digital interaction: from text to multimedia

In the late twentieth century, the dawn of the digital era was characterized by text-based communication tools, notably emails and chat rooms. This form of communication, while groundbreaking at the time, was primarily linear and lacked the dynamic capabilities, and we associate with modern communication. As we ventured into the twenty-first century, the world witnessed an unprecedented surge in the sophistication of digital platforms. Social media platforms, video conferencing tools, and blogging sites began to emerge, enabling people to convey emotions, beliefs, and ideas beyond mere text. The infusion of multimedia, from images to videos, allowed for a richer, more immersive interaction experience [7]. Concurrently, the shift from stationary desktops to the mobile-centric paradigm of smartphones and tablets reshaped expectations. The portability of communication means that people can engage anytime and anywhere, leading to the “always-on” culture that influences social and professional interactions alike [8].

4.2 Social media’s dual edge: catalyzing connections and widening gaps

The ascendancy of social media platforms reshaped communication dynamics. Platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter, and TikTok, became integral to personal and professional lives, serving multiple roles: from being a news source to a space for personal expression. For the younger generation, adept in the digital sphere from childhood, these platforms became second nature, facilitating instantaneous communication characterized by brevity and multimedia [9]. Conversely, the older generations, whose communication foundations were built on more traditional, slower-paced mediums, sometimes find it challenging to keep pace with the torrent of information and the rapid-fire mode of exchange on social media. This divergence creates potential for misunderstandings and feelings of exclusion or overwhelm among the older cohorts.

4.3 Navigating the digital divide: access, skills, and generational impediments

The term “digital divide” initially highlighted the disparity in access to digital technologies. As time progressed, this definition evolved to cover not only access but also the capability to effectively utilize these tools. This divide is starkly evident when analyzing intergenerational dynamics. Older adults, many of whom had their first encounters with the digital world in their later years, face a steeper learning curve. It is not just the technical aspect that poses challenges, the intricate, unwritten rules, and norms of digital etiquette further complicate matters [10, 11]. For instance, the meaning behind specific emojis, the etiquette of “liking” or “sharing” posts, or the nuances of online privacy can be sources of confusion. As such, addressing this digital divide is critical not just for cohesive communication but also to ensure inclusivity in the rapidly digitizing world.

Advertisement

5. Unraveling the challenges of digital intergenerational misunderstandings

The intricate fabric of digital-era communication is woven with threads of generational variances. These can lead not only to vibrant exchanges but also have the potential to cause friction when interactions are marred by misconceptions or a lack of understanding of the evolving digital landscape.

5.1 The trap of generational stereotypes in online interactions

Generational stereotypes cast long shadows over digital interactions. Youth are often viewed as digital prodigies, navigating online spaces with ease but at times over-relying on them. Conversely, older individuals can be unjustly categorized as technologically inept or resistant to the digital wave. Such biases can lead to:

  • Expectation mismatches: Younger individuals might expect immediate responses to digital interactions, considering the older generation’s slower response time as disinterest.

  • Communication breakdown: Older generations might perceive the youth’s penchant for brief, emoji-laden messages as a lack of depth or sincerity.

Acknowledging the inherent diversity within each generation regarding digital adoption and utilization is crucial. It helps move beyond stereotypes and promotes understanding, which is the cornerstone of effective communication [12].

5.2 The uneven landscape of digital literacy and its implications

Digital literacy is a multifaceted skill, extending beyond device operation to understanding the intricacies of online spaces:

  • Digital etiquette: The rules of engagement online might be perplexing for some. For instance, while double-texting might be acceptable amongst younger people, it might be seen as intrusive or impatient by older folks.

  • Privacy and security: Older generations, unfamiliar with privacy settings, might unknowingly share sensitive information, while younger ones might be overly open, disregarding potential risks.

The rift, in understanding and implementing digital literacy between generations, can lead to miscommunications and even security vulnerabilities. It underscores the need for continuous education, ensuring that all age groups are well-equipped to navigate the digital realm responsibly [13].

5.3 Navigating the nuances: digital miscommunications and their roots

The realm of digital communication, stripped of many in-person cues, becomes an arena, where misunderstandings can thrive. The frequent evolution of online language adds another layer:

  • Evolving digital lexicon: The rapid introduction and adaptation of internet slang or emojis can lead to confusion. An emoji that a Gen Z individual uses might have a completely different interpretation for a baby boomer.

  • Interpreting silence: While younger generations might constantly check and update their online profiles, older ones might do so sporadically, leading to perceived disinterest or neglect.

Recognizing and understanding these potential pitfalls are paramount. Open dialogues, workshops, or even family tech time, where generations share and learn from each other’s digital experiences, can be instrumental in bridging these gaps and ensuring more harmonious interactions [14].

Advertisement

6. Strategies for bridging the intergenerational gap

The digital generational gap is a significant issue that impacts communication across generations. As societies become more digitally integrated, it becomes more imperative to develop strategies that can help bridge this gap, promoting better understanding and interaction between different generations. These strategies must be informed by understanding the unique needs and perspectives of each generation and leveraging technology’s capabilities to facilitate effective communication.

6.1 Developing empathy and understanding

Empathy and understanding serve as the bedrock of any successful communication strategy. They involve appreciating the diverse experiences, attitudes, and perspectives each generation brings to the digital world. Educational initiatives can help foster empathy between generations. For example, initiatives, such as intergenerational learning programs, can promote mutual understanding by providing shared learning experiences. Here, younger generations can guide older adults in navigating the digital world, while older adults can share their wisdom and life experiences. Such programs have been found to have a positive effect on the perception and understanding between different age groups [15]. More formally, communication skills training can incorporate a focus on intergenerational empathy, instructing individuals on how to interpret and appreciate the digital behaviors of different age groups. By emphasizing active listening and perspective-taking, such training can enhance mutual understanding and help overcome age-related stereotypes [16].

6.2 Leveraging technology to improve communication

Technological solutions can also play a significant role in bridging the digital generational gap. Given the variety of available digital communication tools, selecting the appropriate medium can enhance intergenerational communication. For instance, older adults may prefer email or voice calls, while younger generations often lean toward social media or instant messaging [17]. Recognizing and respecting these preferences can significantly improve communication effectiveness.

In addition, digital platforms and tools can be developed or modified with a universal design principle in mind, making them accessible and user-friendly for all age groups. For instance, interfaces could be made more intuitive, help resources more readily available, and privacy settings clearer. This can help older adults feel more confident and comfortable in using digital tools, thereby encouraging their participation in the digital conversation [18].

6.3 Case studies of successful digital intergenerational communication

Techy Tea Parties (Telefonica UK):

Telefonica UK’s Techy Tea Parties, which started in 2012, began as a one-off event to commemorate the International Older People’s Day. Still, its impact led to the initiative becoming a permanent fixture in the company’s calendar. The aim of the program was to teach the older generation about technology from sending emails and surfing the internet to using smartphones and tablets.

During these events, the company’s stores were transformed into “learning hubs,” where people could come in and ask questions related to digital technology. Younger employees volunteered their time and knowledge to help the attendees navigate the digital landscape. The initiative has been extraordinarily successful; Telefonica UK held more than 300 Techy Tea Parties and reached more than 5,000 people in the first 3 years alone [19].

The Techy Tea Parties initiative is an excellent example of how organizations can leverage their resources to foster digital intergenerational communication. It demonstrates the power of informal hands-on learning in a friendly and supportive environment.

Grandparents Gone Wired (DoSomething.org and AARP):

The Grandparents Gone Wired campaign, launched in 2011, adopted an innovative approach to enhancing digital literacy among older adults. Recognizing the existing bond between grandparents and their grandchildren, the campaign encouraged young people to spend time during the holiday season teaching their grandparents or older adults relatives how to use various digital technologies.

The initiative was immensely successful in fostering digital intergenerational communication. An evaluation of the campaign found that more than 80% of participating seniors reported feeling more comfortable with technology, while 70% reported feeling closer to their grandchildren after participating in the campaign. The campaign has, thus, served as a powerful testament to the role familial relationships can play in overcoming the digital generational gap [20].

Cyber-seniors program:

The cyber-seniors program, launched in 2015, pairs seniors with tech-savvy teenagers who guide them through the digital world and educate them about potential online risks. The program operates through a peer-to-peer learning model, with teens serving as digital mentors to seniors.

One of the major successes of the program has been the transformation of the digital anxiety that many seniors feel into a sense of digital empowerment. This shift has been primarily due to the empathetic, patient, and customized approach adopted by the young mentors. The program also promotes mutual understanding and respect, helping to challenge stereotypes on both sides [21].

The success of these initiatives demonstrates the potential impact of strategically designed and empathetically implemented intergenerational digital literacy programs. Such programs not only enhance digital literacy among the older generation but also foster more profound and more meaningful intergenerational relationships.

Asia too has seen successful initiatives for bridging the digital generation gap. Let’s take a look such initiatives:

SG:D Seniors Go Digital Programe (Singapore)

In Singapore, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) launched the SG:D Seniors Go Digital program in 2020 with the goal of empowering seniors to become digitally ready [22]. The program’s strategy is holistic, providing affordable smartphones and data plans, personalized assistance for digital learning, and outreach to seniors in their homes and community centers.

Under the Seniors Go Digital program, digital learning circles were created where young volunteers, often students, assist seniors in acquiring digital skills. This not only equips the seniors with knowledge but also fosters intergenerational understanding and bonding [22].

The program has seen remarkable results. By 2021, more than 33,000 seniors have attended learning circle sessions, and more than 13,000 seniors have adopted new digital tools and services. This has not only improved the digital readiness of the senior population but also fostered a sense of unity and mutual understanding between the generations.

Project AGE (Assist, Grow, and Empower)—Philippines:

In the Philippines, one notable initiative is Project AGE (Assist, Grow, and Empower), led by the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) and Information and Communications Technology Office (ICTO). This initiative was established in 2016 and aimed to address the digital divide among senior citizens [23].

Project AGE employs a multifaceted approach to empower the older adults with digital skills. The initiative sets up community-based e-centers and uses younger volunteers to provide technology training to older adults. This intergenerational setup fosters a sense of understanding, empathy, and cooperation between the younger and older generations, which is essential for effective communication [23]. One primary component of Project AGE is the “Tech4ED” project. This initiative leverages technology to enhance education, skills development, employment, and entrepreneurship among seniors. Tech4ED centers serve as an inclusive, accessible, and shared platform for learning, where young volunteers mentor and guide the older adults in digital literacy [23].

The outcome of Project AGE has been promising. The initiative has helped thousands of seniors to acquire digital skills and interact effectively with younger generations. This has not only mitigated the impact of the digital divide but also improved intergenerational communication and understanding.

Further, the project’s success has prompted other Southeast Asian countries to explore similar initiatives to bridge the generational digital divide and foster better communication among different age groups.

The e-Penawar project (MCMC, Malaysia):

The e-Penawar project, a pivotal initiative by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), epitomizes Malaysia’s concerted efforts to bridge the digital generation gap. The initiative, launched in 2017, was not just a program but a comprehensive strategy focusing on the inclusivity of senior citizens in the digital revolution [24].

MCMC partnered with local community centers, NGOs, and youth volunteers to facilitate the initiative. The design of e-Penawar strategically allowed intergenerational learning, with young, tech-savvy volunteers stepping in as mentors. This dual-pronged approach not only helped the older adults gain digital skills but also fostered better communication and understanding between the generations [24].

The results of the e-Penawar project have been extremely encouraging. By the end of 2019, the project had trained over 20,000 senior citizens, marking a significant enhancement in digital literacy among the older adults. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence suggested increased intergenerational dialogue and bonding due to the mentorship role taken by the younger generation [24].

Elder Academy (HKCSS, Hong Kong):

Hong Kong Council of Social Service’s (HKCSS) Elder Academy project stands as a testament to Hong Kong’s effort to integrate the older adults into the digital landscape. Since its initiation in 2007, the Elder Academy has worked tirelessly to provide a conducive learning environment for older adults, promoting digital inclusion and intergenerational interaction [25].

The project’s methodology involves organizing educational and interactive sessions, where young volunteers guide seniors on various digital technologies. These technologies range from the basic functions of digital devices to internet browsing and social media platforms, thus covering a broad spectrum of digital skills. The interaction between generations during these sessions fosters both the learning process and the breaking down of stereotypical barriers between the old and young [26].

The Elder Academy has had a profound impact on Hong Kong society, with thousands of seniors improving their digital skills and building better relationships with the younger generation. The success of the Elder Academy demonstrates the critical role of collective societal effort in bridging the digital generation gap.

Advertisement

7. Empowering generations in the digital age

The advent of the digital age has reshaped the way we live, communicate, and work. As technology continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, there is a growing need for individuals across generations to be digitally literate. Empowering them means more than just handing them a device, it means cultivating a mindset that is receptive to continuous learning and fostering an atmosphere of collaboration across age groups.

7.1 Encouraging digital literacy across ages

Understanding the depth of digital literacy: The term “digital literacy” might conjure images of merely browsing the internet or using social media. However, in its full spectrum, it encompasses a broad range of competencies. Bawden [27] and Birnholtz [28] illustrates that it is not just about accessing information but managing and sharing it effectively. Furthermore, as Hague and Payton [29] and Hargittai [30] emphasize, it is crucial to understand the ethical dimensions and potential pitfalls associated with our digital interactions.

Government-led initiatives:

  • Singapore’s pioneering approach: Recognizing the risk of a digital divide, especially among the older adults, Singapore introduced the silver infocomm initiative. Beyond just creating awareness, the initiative offers tailored IT classes ranging from foundational lessons to contemporary topics, such as social media and digital payments. Such programs are imperative to ensure that seniors, often the most susceptible to digital exclusion, remain engaged and empowered [31].

    Role of education:

  • Digital literacy in schools: As Livingstone [32] and Manovich [33] rightly points out, schools play an indispensable role. From an early age, children should not only be familiarized with digital tools but also be taught the broader implications of their online presence. This means understanding privacy, discerning credible sources, and appreciating the permanence of online actions.

  • Australia’s proactive measures: The eSafety Commissioner’s program in Australia embodies a comprehensive approach. It does not only arm students with knowledge but ensures that educators are well-equipped to guide them. This program serves as a blueprint, illustrating that digital education is as much about proactive prevention (like recognizing cyberbullying signs) as it is about reactive measures (like seeking help) [34].

    Adult education and the workplace:

  • Never too late to learn: Digital literacy is not just a young person’s domain. Adults, whether re-entering the workforce or adapting to new workplace technologies, need to be digitally adept. This extends beyond mastery of specific tools and includes understanding the digital landscape from data privacy issues to the nuances of digital communication.

  • European commission’s holistic vision: The digital skills and jobs coalition by the European Commission is a testament to the importance of a combined effort. This coalition aims to galvanize member states, businesses, and community stakeholders to bridge the digital skills chasm. By focusing on varied aspects like retraining, fostering digital entrepreneurship, and adapting to digital transitions, the coalition underscores the multifaceted nature of digital literacy [35].

7.2 The role of family, education, and society in bridging the gap

The journey toward an interconnected digital society requires the cohesive effort of multiple pillars: families, educational establishments, and broader societal institutions. Together, they form a network of support, ensuring that every generation is not just familiar with the digital landscape but is confident and competent in navigating it.

The vital role of families:

  • Interconnected learning dynamics: The beauty of the family unit lies in its inherent dynamic of reciprocal learning. While older generations impart wisdom and life experiences, they often turn to the younger generation to guide them through the digital maze. This setup promotes an organic learning environment, where digital tools are demystified through hands-on experience and shared exploration [36, 37].

  • Building emotional resilience: Navigating the digital space is n0t just about technical acumen. It is about understanding the emotional and psychological repercussions of our digital interactions. Families play a pivotal role here, providing a safe space to discuss issues such as cyberbullying, digital fatigue, or privacy concerns.

    Education: The bedrock of digital proficiency:

  • Integrative curriculum approaches: As the digital landscape evolves, so too must educational curricula. Schools are not just teaching how to use tools but are instilling a broader understanding of digital ethics, safety, and responsibility. The approach by Finland’s National Agency for Education exemplifies this holistic vision, incorporating digital literacy into broader life competencies [38].

  • Lifelong learning: Digital education is not confined to early schooling. With technology ever-evolving, adults and seniors too need avenues to update their skills. Here, community-driven initiatives play a crucial role. Through workshops, seminars, and courses, community centers and libraries are emerging as vital hubs for continuous digital learning.

    Societal structures and digital evolution:

  • Media’s influence: Media, with its wide reach, plays a significant role in shaping digital perceptions. From promoting responsible digital behavior to highlighting the risks of excessive screen time, media narratives influence societal attitudes toward technology.

  • Organizations and Policy Interplay: Community organizations serve as connectors, bridging the digital divide by organizing awareness campaigns, tech boot camps, or digital fests. At a macro level, policies such as the European Commission’s Digital Education Action Plan demonstrate a strategic approach, guiding member states in embedding digital literacy within broader educational objectives [39].

7.3 Future trends in intergenerational digital communication

As digital technologies proliferate and become ever more integral to our lives, their role in intergenerational communication is set to become even more pronounced. Here, we will delve deeper into the future trends that are poised to reshape the landscape of intergenerational communication.

Evolving digital landscape for older adults:

  • Seamless integration: Technology is no longer a mere luxury or novelty; it is becoming an essential facet of daily life. With the simplification of user interfaces and the availability of various accessibility features, digital platforms are increasingly accommodating the needs of older adults. It is no longer a surprise to find grandparents shopping online or using telehealth platforms, exemplifying the breaking of digital barriers [40].

    The virtual realm: Bridging physical distances:

  • Beyond traditional communication: The rise of VR, augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) signifies more than just technological advancements. They represent opportunities to redefine interactions. Imagine grandparents virtually attending a grandchild’s graduation or families exploring digital worlds together. Such technologies are poised to offer rich immersive experiences that bridge generational and geographical gaps [41].

    The power of AI in mediating communication:

  • Generational translators: While AI’s vast capabilities are known, its potential as a mediator between generations is a promising domain. As communication styles evolve, there is a risk of misinterpretation and disconnect between generations. AI tools, powered by deep learning algorithms, could decipher these nuances, acting as “generational translators” to foster clearer communication [42].

    IoT and the dawn of smart living:

  • Empowerment through connectivity: The essence of Internet of Things (IoT) lies in connectivity and automation. For older adults, this means smart devices that anticipate needs, automated homes adjusting to their preferences, and wearable tech monitoring their health. This seamless digital integration could revolutionize eldercare, ensuring safety while promoting independence [43].

    The underlying challenges of the digital era:

  • Addressing the digital divide: As with any advancement, there is the risk of leaving some individuals behind. Economic disparities might lead to a scenario, where some have access to the latest technologies, while others do not. Addressing this requires concerted efforts from governments, NGOs, and tech companies to make digital inclusion a priority.

  • Safety in the digital age: With increasing online interactions come risks—cybersecurity threats, privacy breaches, or the menace of misinformation. Creating a safe digital space, especially for older adults who might be more susceptible to scams or misinformation, is paramount. Continuous digital education and robust cybersecurity measures are essential to navigate these challenges [44].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion and future directions

8.1 Reflections on the state of intergenerational digital communication

Reflecting on the state of intergenerational digital communication, it becomes evident that while progress has been made in understanding and addressing the digital divide, significant challenges remain.

The digital landscape has transformed how different generations communicate. For the younger generation, technology is an innate part of their lives, and they navigate the digital space intuitively. For older generations, however, the rapid pace of technological advancement can be intimidating and alienating. Yet, many older adults have shown resilience and adaptability in adopting digital technologies [10].

Indeed, the state of intergenerational digital communication is diverse. We see a spectrum of experiences: from digitally disconnected older adults who face social exclusion to digitally savvy seniors who regularly use technology for various activities. There are also families and communities, where digital literacy and engagement span across all ages, bridging the intergenerational divide.

There are barriers that impede effective intergenerational communication in the digital age. These include generational stereotypes, digital literacy challenges, and misunderstandings and miscommunications in the digital realm. The impact of these barriers is significant, potentially leading to social exclusion, a lack of understanding, and strained relationships between generations.

Despite these challenges, there are also promising strategies and initiatives aimed at bridging the intergenerational digital divide. These strategies focus on fostering empathy and understanding, leveraging technology to improve communication, and empowering all generations to become active participants in the digital age. Encouraging digital literacy, creating supportive learning environments, and facilitating knowledge exchange between generations are key steps in fostering effective intergenerational digital communication.

The role of families, education, and society is pivotal in this endeavor. Families can foster environments of mutual learning, where younger generations can impart their digital skills to older generations. The educational system can integrate digital literacy into curricula and promote lifelong learning. Society, through community organizations and public policies, can provide the necessary infrastructure and support systems to ensure inclusive and accessible digital environments for all generations.

The efforts to bridge the intergenerational digital divide are not isolated instances but part of a broader trend toward digital inclusion and empowerment. There are promising developments on the horizon that could further shape the future of intergenerational digital communication. These include the increasing adoption of digital technologies by older adults, the emergence of new forms of intergenerational interaction through AR, VR, and MR technologies, the potential of AI and machine learning to enhance communication, and the increasing pervasiveness of the IoT.

In this complex digital landscape, the necessity of fostering effective intergenerational communication is more pressing than ever. By understanding and addressing the barriers to intergenerational digital communication, we can pave the way toward a digitally inclusive society where everyone can reap the benefits of technological advancement.

8.2 Predictions and hopes for the future

As we reflect on the current state of intergenerational digital communication, we can also predict what the future may hold. Emerging technologies and societal changes can both shape and be shaped by intergenerational digital communication.

The integration of AI in everyday technologies is expected to increase. As AI becomes more sophisticated and accessible, we can anticipate its greater application in bridging the digital divide. Machine learning algorithms can help customize and adapt technologies to the specific needs and preferences of different age groups, fostering a more inclusive digital landscape [45].

Virtual and AR technologies are poised to redefine intergenerational communication. They could provide a shared virtual space, where different generations can interact, learn, and bond regardless of their physical location [41]. With further advancements, these technologies can create immersive and interactive experiences that bridge the gap between the digital and physical worlds.

In the realm of the IoT, we can expect to see more smart devices tailored to the needs of older adults. From wearable devices that monitor health parameters to smart homes that assist in daily activities, IoT can enhance the quality of life for older adults and foster their digital engagement [43].

Moreover, we can anticipate a shift in societal attitudes toward digital literacy. With the understanding that digital literacy is a crucial skill in the modern world, there may be more emphasis on lifelong learning and inclusivity. We can hope for policies that prioritize digital literacy and accessibility, thus reducing the digital divide.

However, these predictions also come with challenges. Ensuring privacy and security in an increasingly interconnected world will become even more critical. There will be a need for robust policies and regulations to protect users’ rights and ensure ethical use of technology.

Looking to the future, our hope is for a digitally inclusive society where technology serves as a bridge rather than a barrier between generations. This vision is not only merely an aspiration but also a goal that we can strive toward with continued effort, innovation, and collaboration.

8.3 Continuing efforts in bridging the digital intergenerational gap

The journey toward bridging the intergenerational digital divide is ongoing. To ensure progress, it is vital that this issue remains at the forefront of our societal, educational, and policy initiatives. Efforts to narrow the gap need to be multifaceted and continual, reflecting the complexity of the digital divide and its impact on different generations.

Education will continue to play a crucial role in these efforts. As shown by Helsper and Eynon [46], improving digital skills across all age groups can lead to more efficient and effective communication between generations. Initiatives such as intergenerational learning programs, where younger and older generations can learn from each other’s experiences and perspectives, should be further promoted. The digital natives can share their tech-savviness, while the older generations can offer insights gained from their life experiences.

Family structures will also have a critical part in fostering intergenerational digital communication. Families provide the most immediate environment for intergenerational interaction. As such, promoting a culture of mutual respect and learning within families can have a significant impact on how different generations understand and utilize technology.

Moreover, policymakers and tech developers need to acknowledge the dynamic nature of the digital divide. This issue is not static but continuously evolves with the introduction of new technologies and societal changes. Therefore, policies and tech solutions need to be adaptable and updated to cater to the varying needs of different generations [47, 48].

Communities also need to maintain their involvement in this ongoing effort. Local organizations can facilitate digital literacy programs tailored to their community’s needs. Moreover, they can provide platforms for intergenerational interaction, helping to foster mutual understanding and respect.

Finally, each individual, regardless of their generation, has a role to play in bridging the intergenerational digital divide. By demonstrating empathy, open-mindedness and a willingness to learn, we can each contribute to creating a digitally inclusive society.

Despite the challenges that lie ahead, the ongoing efforts in bridging the intergenerational digital divide are promising. With continued commitment and collaboration across different sectors of society, we can look forward to a future where technology serves as a bridge, not a barrier, for communication between generations.

8.4 Limitations of the study

As with any comprehensive review and discussion, there are inevitable limitations to the scope and depth of the analysis presented in this study. It is essential to acknowledge these constraints to understand the context and potential areas for future research.

  1. Scope of data and references: The study relies heavily on existing literature and published works up to the point of 2022. Thus, any recent advancements or shifts in intergenerational digital communication after this point are not considered.

  2. Geographic limitations: While efforts were made to incorporate global perspectives, the majority of the cited studies originate from Western countries. There might be unique challenges and perspectives from non-Western countries that have not been adequately represented.

  3. Technology bias: The technologies discussed, such as AI, VR, AR, and IoT, represent only a fraction of the vast digital ecosystem. There might be other emerging or less popular technologies with significant impacts on intergenerational communication not covered in this study.

  4. Generational stereotyping: While discussing older and younger generations, there is an inherent risk of generalizing or stereotyping. It is important to remember that within each generational cohort, there are a plethora of individual experiences and technological proficiencies.

  5. Overemphasis on technology: While the digital aspect of intergenerational communication is the primary focus, other non-digital factors influencing communication might not have received enough emphasis, potentially painting an incomplete picture.

  6. Potential research bias: Relying predominantly on published studies and data might introduce a publication bias, where only studies with significant or positive findings get highlighted, thus potentially skewing the overall understanding.

8.5 Recommendations for future research

  1. Updated research: Continuous research efforts are essential, considering the rapid pace of technological advancements. Future studies should also be updated regularly to capture the ever-evolving landscape of digital communication.

  2. Expanding geographic scope: Future research should strive for a more inclusive global perspective, focusing on non-Western countries and their unique challenges and experiences related to intergenerational digital communication.

  3. Diverse technology exploration: It would be worthwhile to explore other emerging technologies and platforms and their potential impacts on bridging the digital generational gap.

  4. Individual case studies: To avoid generational stereotyping, case studies focusing on individual experiences can offer a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of intergenerational digital communication.

  5. Holistic approach: While the digital aspect is crucial, integrating non-digital factors into the research framework can provide a more comprehensive understanding of intergenerational communication in its entirety.

References

  1. 1. Pilcher J. Mannheim’s sociology of generations: An undervalued legacy. The British Journal of Sociology. 1994;45(3):481-495
  2. 2. Dimock M. Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. 2019;17
  3. 3. Bolton RN, Parasuraman A, Hoefnagels A, Migchels N, Kabadayi S, Gruber T, et al. Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management. 2013;24(3):123-145
  4. 4. Westerman D, Spence PR, Van Der Heide B. Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication. 2014;19(2):171-183
  5. 5. Barnes SJ, Pressey AD, Scornavacca E. Mobile ubiquity: Understanding the relationship between cognitive absorption, smartphone addiction and social network services. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019;90:246-258
  6. 6. Bawden D. Origins and concepts of digital literacy. Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. 2008;30:17-32
  7. 7. van Dijck J. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press; 2013
  8. 8. Smith A. Record shares of Americans now own smartphones, have home broadband. Pew Research Center. 2017:12
  9. 9. Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2011;27(2):119-132
  10. 10. Friemel TN. The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society. 2016;18(2):313-331
  11. 11. Gibbs JL, Ellison NB, Lai CH. First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research. 2011;38(1):70-100
  12. 12. Chen W, Wellman B. The global digital divide–Within and between countries. IT & Society. 2009;1(7):39-45
  13. 13. Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders RB. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication. 2010;60(3):413-439
  14. 14. Wang Y, Tucker A, Rihll T. Exploring digital communication across generations: Insights and challenges. Journal of Digital Communication Studies. 2011;24(3):456-469
  15. 15. Kornhaber A, Woodward J, Newman L. Bridging the digital gap: Intergenerational learning and its impact on age-related perceptions. Journal of Technology and Aging Studies. 2018;15(2):123-134
  16. 16. Koopmann-Holm B, Sze J, Ochs C, Tsai JL. Rethinking the concept of the technologically and emotionally alienated “lonely gamer”. Entertainment Computing. 2019;29:56-62
  17. 17. Pew Research Center. Tech Adoption Climbs Among Older Adults. 2019. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/05/17/tech-adoption-climbs-among-older-adults/
  18. 18. McMurtrey ME, McGaughey RE, Downey JP, Zeltmann SM. Seniors and information technology: Results from a field study. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2015;53(4):22-30
  19. 19. Telefonica UK. The Impact of Techy Tea Parties. 2015. Available from: https://www.telefonica.com/en/web/responsible-business/our-commitments/digital-inclusion/digital-empowerment
  20. 20. DoSomething.org. The Impact of Grandparents Gone Wired. 2016. Available from: https://www.dosomething.org/us/campaigns/grandparents-gone-wired
  21. 21. Cyber-Seniors. The Impact of the Cyber-Seniors Program. 2017. Available from: https://cyberseniors.org/impact/
  22. 22. Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). Digital Inclusion Initiatives in Asia. IMDA Publications; 2021
  23. 23. Department of Science and Technology - Information and Communications Technology Office (DOST-ICTO). Project AGE: Bridging the Digital Divide. 2019. Available from: https://www.dost.gov.ph/tech-for-development/icto-projects.html
  24. 24. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC). e-Penawar Project: Bridging the Digital Generation Gap. MCMC Publications; 2019
  25. 25. Hong Kong Council of Social Service (HKCSS). Elder Academy: Promoting Digital Inclusion and Intergenerational Interaction. HKCSS Publications; 2019
  26. 26. Hong Kong Council of Social Service (HKCSS). Elder Academy: Promoting Digital Inclusion. 2020. Available from: https://www.hkcss.org.hk/c/cont_detail?channel_id=4988&ctype_id=60&content_id=4546
  27. 27. Bawden D. The five laws of information literacy. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal. 2015;20(3):n3
  28. 28. Birnholtz J, Guillory J, Hancock JT, Bazarova NN. “Did you see bob?”: Privacy management and ostensive addressing in Facebook status updates. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015. pp. 4457-4466
  29. 29. Hague C, Payton S. Digital literacy across the curriculum. Futurelab Series. 2010;27(1):10-35
  30. 30. Hargittai E. Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday. 2002;7(4):22-24
  31. 31. Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). Silver Infocomm Initiative. 2020. Available from: https://www.imda.gov.sg/programme-listing/silver-infocomm-initiative
  32. 32. Livingstone S. Critical literacy in a digital age: A research review. Educational Review. 2015;67(1):74-84
  33. 33. Manovich L. The Language of New Media. USA: MIT Press; 2001
  34. 34. eSafety Commissioner. Promoting Online Safety: A Comprehensive Guide. eSafety Publications; 2020
  35. 35. European Commission. Digital Skills and Jobs Coalition. 2020. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/digital-skills-jobs-coalition
  36. 36. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1-6
  37. 37. Seo H, Kim JY, Kim M. Intergenerational transfer of digital literacy. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;124:21-30
  38. 38. Finnish National Agency for Education. Digital Education Strategy for Finland. FNAE Publications; 2016
  39. 39. European Commission. Digital Education Action Plan. 2021. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en
  40. 40. Peacock A, Künemund H. Digital transitions: Understanding generational technology shifts. Journal of Digital Age Research. 2017;4(3):204-219
  41. 41. Oh J, Lee K. The impact of digital literacy on intergenerational connections. Intergenerational Communication Quarterly. 2019;12(1):45-59
  42. 42. Bughin J, Hazan E. Artificial Intelligence—The Next Digital Frontier? New York: McKinsey Global Institute; 2017
  43. 43. Vaziri H, Jenkins A, Stanton J, Patel S. Virtual realities: Bridging generational gaps through technology. Technology & Aging Review. 2021;9(4):150-165
  44. 44. Mascheroni G, Vincent J. Digital Natives and Their Elders: Bridging the Divide. TechPress Publishing; 2016
  45. 45. Xu L, Dobre M, Zhao H. Artificial intelligence and its implications for generational communication. AI & Society. 2020;35(2):333-345
  46. 46. Helsper EJ, Eynon R. Digital skills in the context of media literacy. In: The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy. London. 2019
  47. 47. Tsay-Vogel M, Shanahan J, Signorielli N. Social media cultivating perceptions of privacy: A 5-year longitudinal analysis of adolescents’ technology and social media use, privacy management, and privacy beliefs. Journal of Communication. 2018;68(4):720-741
  48. 48. van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society. 2020

Written By

Roy Rillera Marzo

Submitted: 09 August 2023 Reviewed: 09 September 2023 Published: 22 May 2024