Abstract
Agricultural crop growth and productivity are significantly influenced by a wide variety of biotic and abiotic factors. In order to address these shortcomings, substantial amounts of chemical fertilisers are administered to the land. The widespread use of chemical fertilisers has led to the degradation of ecosystems and various associated issues, including decreased nutritional quality of crops and the long-term decline in soil fertility. The excessive uses of fertilisers and pesticides have adverse implications for soil vitality, resulting in a substantial reduction in the biomass. Therefore, the use of biochar has been sustainable method and a potentially efficient strategy for improving soil quality and addressing the issue of heavy metal pollution in soil. Integrating biochar into the soil offers a significant chance to enhance soil quality and promote plant growth. The efficacy of biochar in enhancing nutrient cycles on agricultural lands is highlighted by its positive impact on plant growth and soil vitality, rendering it a practical instrument for mitigating nutrient deficiencies. The present chapter focuses on the utilisation of biochar and its impact on the soil microbial population, plant diseases, plant-parasitic nematodes, and insect pests and highlights the utility of biochar as an effective agent for plant protection.
Keywords
- biochar
- plant protection
- sustainable method
- plant diseases
- insect pests
1. Introduction
The growth and productivity of agricultural crops are profoundly impacted by a diverse range of biotic and abiotic factors [1, 2]. To address these deficiencies, significant quantities of chemical fertilisers are applied to the soil [3, 4]. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that plants possess a restricted capacity to assimilate water-soluble nutrients. The remaining elements undergo a transformation process, leading to the creation of forms that are not soluble. Consequently, it becomes imperative to periodically administer fertilisers in order to ensure a consistent provision of essential nutrients for the purpose of facilitating plant growth [5]. The extensive utilisation of chemical fertilisers has resulted in the deterioration of ecosystems and various related problems, such as diminished nutritional value of crops and the long-term reduction of soil fertility [6, 7]. Alongside fertilisers, pesticides provide a significant concern within the field of agriculture due to their noteworthy environmental consequences, which exert a major influence on the microbiological characteristics of soil. The overuse of fertilisers and pesticides, as well as their persistent presence in the soil, have negative consequences for soil health, leading to a significant decrease in the biomass of bacteria and fungus [8, 9]. Huang et al. [10] conducted a study to investigate the effects of prolonged exposure to inorganic fertilisers and/or organic manures on the structural diversity and dominant bacterial groups in agricultural soils. However, it is important to acknowledge that biofertilizers have the ability to enhance soil fertility by revitalising it. As a result, they present themselves as advantageous candidates for the promotion of sustainable agriculture and the mitigation of stress within agro-ecosystems. Moreover, the incorporation of organic soil supplements, particularly in the context of remediation, is occasionally justified based on their cost-effectiveness, often necessitating the implementation of alternative waste management methods (such as landfill deposition or cremation). In order to meet certain criteria, soil amendments must possess certain characteristics such as a strong capacity for binding, compatibility with the surrounding environment, and the lack of any detrimental impacts on soil structure, fertility, or the wider ecosystem [11]. The utilisation of biochar has been recognised as a sustainable approach and a potentially effective technique for enhancing soil quality and mitigating the problem of heavy metal contamination in soil [12]. When a bibliometric analysis was conducted using the key words “biochar”, “insect pest management” and “plant protection”, it was observed that the total number of publications was increased since 2001 (Figure 1a), while in agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Environmental Sciences and Biological Sciences related journals, this topic was focussed more (Figure 1b). Further, this topic was more focussed on diverse articles followed by book chapters and edited books (Figure 1c), while major articles were published in encyclopedia of the unsustainable development goals and the science of the total environment (Figure 1d), and bibliometric studies also indicated that biochars related to plant protection contributed higher to sustainable development goals (SDG) 2 (zero hunger) followed by SDG 13 (climate action) and SDG 15 (life on land) (Figure 1e). Thus, current study analyses the plant protection potential of biochar and its way forward in pest management.
A carbonaceous material with a sizable percentage of organic materials makes up biochar, an organic amendment. This chemical is produced as a byproduct of pyrolysis, a process that involves heating biomass to high temperatures and low oxygen levels. The process of pyrolysis, which includes the thermal breakdown of biomass materials like wood, dung, or leaves at high temperatures in an oxygen-poor atmosphere, produces biochar. The aforementioned procedure results in the production of biochar as the principal output, along with minor byproducts like as oil and gas. The extent of these remaining compounds is dependent on the specific processing parameters. Recent research have revealed that biochar, derived from the carbonisation of organic waste, possesses the potential to serve as a viable replacement material. The replacement of a certain element has consequences for the process of storing carbon in soil, as well as alterations to its physical, chemical, and biological characteristics [13]. The use of biochar shows promise in the production of renewable energy in agricultural regions, while also aligning with environmentally conscious principles. In a previous study, Verheijen et al. [14] observed that the use of biochar had discernible effects on the toxicity, transport, and destiny of specific heavy metals within soil. The primary cause of this phenomenon was predominantly ascribed to the enhanced soil adsorption capacity aided by the presence of biochar. Several key elements can be ascribed to the enhanced soil properties and heightened nutrient uptake by plants in soils treated with biochar. The nutrient and ash composition, expansive surface area, porous structure, and microbe habitat function are among the aspects that encompass biochar [15]. The research conducted by Rawat et al. [16] demonstrated that the use of biochar led to a reduction in soil compaction, indicating its potential to effectively mitigate this issue. Significant attention has been devoted to evaluating the advantages of introducing rhizobacteria into soil. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognise that the incorporation of biochar into the soil can also enhance the availability of nutrients, hence providing benefits to agricultural products. Bhanse et al. [17] emphasise the utilisation of plant growth-promoting microorganisms in conjunction with biochar as the optimal approach for boosting the development and output of French beans. The integration of biochar into the soil presents a considerable opportunity to improve soil quality and stimulate plant growth, so making a valuable contribution to the development of a sustainable agricultural paradigm. Extensive research has been conducted to investigate the viability of utilising biochar additions for soil reclamation [18] and for the promotion of sustainable agriculture practises that aim to achieve high crop yield while mitigating environmental damage. The potential of biochar to increase nutrient cycles on farms is underscored by its good influence on plant growth and soil health, making it a realistic tool for addressing nutrient deficits. As a result, there has been a significant focus on examining the advantageous impacts of using biochar amendments in relation to soil stability and the facilitation of plant growth.
2. Role of biochar in plant protection
What are the processes by which biochar regulates plant diseases? There have been a minimum of five proposed mechanisms, namely: (i) the induction of systemic resistance in host plants; (ii) the augmentation of beneficial microorganisms in terms of their abundance and/or efficacy; (iii) modifications to soil quality with respect to nutrient accessibility and abiotic factors; (iv) the direct fungitoxic effect of biochar; and (v) the adsorption of allelopathic and phytotoxic compounds (Figure 2). The phenomenon of induced resistance in plants has been suggested as a potential mechanism for the regulation of disease suppression [19, 20]. The application of biochar was carried out in this study in a specific geographic region that was physically segregated from the infection sites. This purposeful dissociation was carried out in order to successfully eradicate any alternative mechanisms that may otherwise aid in the suppression of illness. More empirical support for the idea of induced resistance was offered by Harel et al. [21] and Mehari et al. [22], who showed that both the induced systemic resistance (ISR) and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) pathways were involved. According to a study by Harel et al. [21], adding biochar to substrates used to grow strawberry plants caused several genes to be noticeably upregulated. The genes contained in this collection encode three pathogenic-related proteins (FaPR1, Faolp2, and Fra a3), a lipoxygenase producing gene (Falox), and a trans-acting factor (FaWRKY1) gene from the WRKY family. Mehari et al. [22] investigated the role of jasmonic acid (JA) in biochar-induced systemic resistance (ISR) in tomato plants by looking at the
The second hypothesised mechanism for illness suppression involves the potential augmentation of beneficial bacteria’ proliferation and/or functions through the incorporation of biochar. Subsequently, these bacteria confer protection to the plant by mitigating the risk of pathogenic assaults. There is a growing body of empirical evidence that substantiates the proposition that biochar exerts a beneficial influence on various facets of microbial activity. Liang et al. [23] demonstrated that the application of biochar results in a significant augmentation of microbial biomass. Furthermore, the study conducted by Warnock et al. [24] has demonstrated that the application of biochar has a positive impact on the colonisation of roots by mycorrhizal fungi. In addition, Graber et al. [25] and Kolton et al. [26] have both provided evidence supporting the notion that biochar facilitates the proliferation of microbes that stimulate plant growth. Positive effects have been found to be correlated with both physiological and nutritional factors. According to Lehmann et al. [27], the porous structure and substantial specific surface area of biochar create an environment that is favourable and safe for many microorganisms, such as mites, collembolan, protozoans, and nematodes. Based on the findings of Downie et al. [28], it has been observed through empirical research that the porous composition of biochar can effectively serve as a refuge for bacteria and mycorrhizal fungus, enabling them to evade predators. The assertion is additionally corroborated by the research conducted by Warnock [24]. In terms of its nutritional implications, biochar possesses the capacity to provide organic carbon that can facilitate the proliferation of saprophytic microbes. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the impact of this phenomenon is expected to be considerably less prominent in comparison to other organic additions, such as agricultural wastes and composts. The biochemical compatibility of biomass with microbial needs undergoes a substantial decrease throughout the pyrolysis process. The main reason for this phenomenon can be attributed to the progressive exhaustion of carbon sources that can be easily broken down, coupled with the simultaneous accumulation of aromatic constituents that exhibit resistance to degradation [29]. Consequently, through the process of pyrolysis, biochar undergoes a conversion into an organic material that promotes agricultural productivity, albeit with restricted ability to facilitate microbial growth. The findings mentioned above collectively indicate that biochar has the potential to be a viable alternative to soil supplements such as agricultural wastes or composts. This is because biochar has the ability to enhance the functionality of beneficial microorganisms selectively, while also preventing the proliferation of pathogen populations and their detrimental impacts. Further investigation is required to explore this topic in greater depth, as the current body of research is limited in terms of establishing a clear link between changes in microbial communities resulting from biochar and the successful mitigation of diseases. This is despite the growing knowledge surrounding the influence of biochar on soil microbiomes, as highlighted by Lehmann et al. [27].
The third hypothetical mechanism posits that modifications in soil characteristics, specifically pertaining to nutrient accessibility and abiotic factors, have the potential to impact the overall dynamics of plant-pathogen interactions. In accordance with the findings of Gaskin et al. [30], the addition of biochar supplements generally enhances the concentrations of essential soil cations, including calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), and potassium (K+). Furthermore, the study conducted by Yuan and Xu [31] revealed that the use of biochar amendments has a tendency to increase soil pH levels. Nevertheless, the impact of bioavailability on crucial plant nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus, remains a subject of significant debate [32]. The biochar generated by the pyrolysis process frequently has an elevated carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio in comparison to the initial feedstocks. This is primarily attributed to the selective elimination of nitrogen in favour of organic carbon during the pyrolysis procedure. The C/N ratio of the biochar produced is determined by various factors, including the temperature used during the pyrolysis process and the initial characteristics of the biomass used. Schofield et al. [33] posited that the incorporation of organic materials characterised by a high carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio into soil leads to the augmentation of microbial activity. The heightened microbial activity that ensues consequently restricts the accessibility of mineral nitrogen, thereby impeding the saprophytic abilities of pathogens and hence inhibiting the progression of illness. Based on the aforementioned data, it may be deduced that biochar exhibits considerable potential in impacting the interactions between plants and pathogens. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that, based on current knowledge, there exists a dearth of definitive empirical data from research studies that definitively establish a causal relationship between the augmentation of soil nutrient levels or modifications in soil abiotic factors, such as the liming effect, through the utilisation of biochar, and the effective mitigation of diseases.
One plausible mechanism that may account for the decline in illnesses is the direct fungitoxic effect of biochar. Significant chemical transformations take place during the process of biomass pyrolysis, resulting in the degradation of O-alkyl carbons found in carbohydrates. Concurrently, there is a simultaneous generation of aliphatic and aromatic carbon compounds. In addition, it has been noted by Spokas et al. [34] that pyrolysis produces a diverse range of organic compounds that possess the capacity to demonstrate fungitoxic characteristics. However, studies investigating the precise fungitoxic properties of biochar have indicated that its ability to prevent fungal growth is often minimal or insignificant. An example of this may be seen in the study conducted by Jaiswal et al. [35], where it was observed that various forms of biochar effectively inhibited the occurrence of damping-off disease caused by
3. Biochar in plant-biotic interactions
3.1 Biochar in insect pest management
The existing body of research has extensively examined the positive impacts of biochar on soil in terms of chemical, physical, and microbiological enhancements. However, the potential indirect consequences of biochar on plant diseases and herbivorous insects in soils modified with biochar have not been thoroughly investigated (Figure 3). While several studies have demonstrated the potential of biochar applications in reducing infections caused by soilborne pathogens like
3.2 Biochar effect on the soil microbial community
The planet’s soil ecosystems are home to the widest variety of terrestrial communities, and soil microorganisms are largely responsible for this extraordinary diversity [42]. Therefore, it is imperative to understand how biochar affects the soil microbiota, as Ng and Cavagnaro [43] pointed out. Because of its porous structure, biochar has microsites that can host soil microorganisms and provide them with a fresh environment (Figure 3). Since little is known about how biochar affects different organisms selectively, its potential as a microbial habitat is yet unknown. Furthermore, it is unknown how other elements like food availability and predation affect microbial response to biochar [43]. It has been noted that adding biochar to several experiments causes a significant increase in microbial biomass. It has been observed that the microbial communities’ composition and the activity of the enzymes are significantly altered by the ensuing increase in microbial biomass. A number of adjustments can be made to clarify the possible biogeochemical effects of biochar, including how it affects crop development, plant disease prevention, and nutrient cycling [27, 44]. One of the ways that biochar promotes microbial activity is through its porous nature. Furthermore, the abundance and availability of dangerous compounds are altered by biochar, changing abiotic variables like pH and giving some microbial communities an edge over others. Moreover, microbes can use biochar as a feasible energy source or as a way to obtain necessary mineral components [45]. There are several documented instances of interactions between soil, bacteria, and biochar that can have both positive and negative consequences. For instance, adding biochar made from wheat husks to temperate soils increased the diversity of microbes. Since the biochar’s organic carbon utilisation and metabolic activity were determined to be negligible, the rise was mostly due to physicochemical factors [46]. In tomato plants, the introduction of biochar made from eucalyptus wood chips at a concentration of 1% (wt/wt) increased bacterial diversity and altered the plants’ ability to metabolise nutrients. This was the conclusion of a study carried out by Kolton et al. [47]. Similar results were seen by Kolton et al. [26] when pepper plants were cultivated with citrus wood-derived biochar. By using biochar made from red spruce pellets and grapevine residues, Taskin et al. [48] report that the growth and enzyme activity of ligninolytic fungi living in the soil were enhanced. According to Wong et al. [49], the application of biochar derived from peanut shells and wheat straw to a recently constructed landfill cover topsoil resulted in an augmentation of soil bacterial community diversity. In contrast, certain biochar variants that had elevated levels of phosphorus, such as those derived from chicken sources, exhibited a notable decrease in the colonisation of roots by mycorrhizal fungi. However, it is worth noting that this reduction did not have any discernible impact on crop productivity, as indicated by Solaiman et al. [50]. Furthermore, the utilisation of rice straw-derived biochar was observed to elicit detrimental consequences on the model organism
3.3 The use of biochar against plant pathogens
Research findings have provided intriguing revelations concerning the influence of biochar on plant diseases. According to Frenkel et al. [54], it has been observed that lower concentrations (≤1%) of biochar have the ability to suppress a range of disorders. Conversely, greater concentrations (>3%) tend to be ineffective, leading to a dose-response pattern that resembles an inverted U-shaped curve. In order to maintain a consistent and replicable impact of biochar on agricultural practises, it is advisable for biochar manufacturers to establish uniformity in the selection of feedstocks and concentrations, while also taking into account the potential implications on plant diseases [55]. The significance of this matter lies in its relevance, as the varied source and treatment of raw materials utilised in the production of biochar can result in variable outcomes with regards to disease suppression in agricultural systems (Figure 3). Biochar utilises various mechanisms to safeguard plants against diseases. These mechanisms encompass the facilitation of plant growth through nutrient provision, the augmentation of soil-microbial diversity, the adsorption of toxins generated by pathogens (such as extracellular enzymes and organic acids), the stimulation of antibiotic or fungitoxic compound production, the modification of root exudate chemistry, and the initiation of systemic plant defence mechanisms via chemical compounds acting as elicitors or microorganisms residing in microhabitats [56, 57]. Biochar has demonstrated efficient utilisation in combatting a diverse array of plant diseases, including those present in the air or soil, as well as many types of pests. Moreover, the research conducted by Lou et al. [58] has validated the growth-enhancing characteristics of biochar water-wash extracts, which contain a substantial amount of organic and inorganic chemicals. These findings indicate the need for additional investigation in this area. It is noteworthy that the advantageous impacts of biochar are occasionally more closely associated with its ability to enhance plant development rather than eliciting plant defence mechanisms. An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of applying poplar woodchip biochar on the growth of
3.4 Biochar for the control of plant-pathogenic bacteria
The primary focus of utilising biochar as a mitigation technique for plant diseases caused by bacterial pathogens has been on tackling the specific issue of bacterial wilt disease, predominantly attributed to the pathogen
3.5 Biochar for the control of plant-pathogenic fungi
Fungi are widely recognised as a prominent and highly deleterious category of plant pathogens [64], hence presenting a substantial agricultural risk. Soilborne infections, caused by the presence of
Furthermore, biochar has been found to enhance the ability of plants to fight foliar plant pathogenic fungus. The primary mechanism observed for the phenomenon of induced resistance is the systemic activation of defence mechanisms, as described by Shirai and Eulgem [75].
3.6 Biochar for the control of plant-pathogenic oomycetes
Oomycetes exhibit characteristics that facilitate their effective infection and subsequent mortality of several plant species, including those of considerable economic importance as food and cash crops [79]. In parallel to the investigation of plant-pathogenic bacteria, there exists a restricted corpus of scholarly inquiry pertaining to the use of biochar for the purpose of oomycete management. The utilisation of biochar as a means of addressing plant disease caused by Phytophthora has been mostly focused on species that infect trees. Previous studies have shown evidence that the application of biochar generated from pine plant tissues at a concentration of 5% (vol/vol) can enhance the activation of plant defence systems through the induction of systemic resistance. The phenomenon described has been documented in
3.7 Biochar for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes
Singh et al. [81] have reported that the occurrence of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) has been linked to an average decline in agricultural productivity by roughly 12.3%. Biochar is widely recognised as an ecologically sustainable strategy for mitigating the impact of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) by employing various techniques. For instance, modifications in the biodiversity of nematode populations residing in the soil have exhibited effectiveness in mitigating the impact of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs). The effect of incorporating biochar produced from wheat straw on the variety of soil nematodes was assessed in a microcosm experiment. According to Zhang et al. [82], the phenomenon resulted in a rise in the population of fungivorous nematodes and a decline in plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) from different genera such as
4. Conclusion
Knowledge of the role of biochar in plant protection can be highly beneficial in the context of advanced pest management for several reasons:
Thus, knowing how biochar protects plants is important for advanced pest management because it provides a comprehensive strategy that enhances soil health, plant vitality, sustainability, and direct insect control. It is feasible to lessen the need for chemical pesticides, support healthier ecosystems, and improve agricultural systems’ overall resistance to pests and other environmental problems by using biochar into pest management techniques.
References
- 1.
Samal I, Bhoi NSTK, Dhillon MK. Pheno-morphological traits of diverse Brassica juncea (L.) genotypes determining variability in Lipaphiserysimi (Kaltenbach) population build-up. Journal of Oilseed Brassica. 2023;14 (2):159-169 - 2.
Bhatnagar S, Mahanta DK, Vyas V, et al. Storage pest management with nanopesticides incorporating silicon nanoparticles: A novel approach for sustainable crop preservation and food security. Silicon. 2024; 16 :471-483. DOI: 10.1007/s12633-023-02694-y - 3.
Mahanta DK, Bhoi TK, Komal J, Samal I, Nikhil RM, Paschapur AU, et al. Insect-pathogen crosstalk and the cellular-molecular mechanisms of insect immunity: Uncovering the underlying signaling pathways and immune regulatory function of non-coding RNAs. Frontiers in Immunology. 2023; 14 :1-19 - 4.
Samal I, Bhoi TK, Raj MN, Majhi PK, Murmu S, Pradhan AK, et al. Underutilized legumes: Nutrient status and advanced breeding approaches for qualitative and quantitative enhancement. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2023; 10 :1110750 - 5.
Samal I, Bhoi TK, Majhi PK, Murmu S, Pradhan AK, Kumar D, et al. Combatting insects mediated biotic stress through plant associated endophytic entomopathogenic fungi in horticultural crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023; 13 :1098673 - 6.
Tang Q , Cotton A, Wei Z, Xia Y, Daniell T, Yan X. How does partial substitution of chemical fertiliser with organic forms increase sustainability of agricultural production? Science of the Total Environment. 2022; 803 :149933. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149933 - 7.
Samal I, Bhoi TK, Vyas V, et al. Resistance to fungicides in entomopathogenic fungi: Underlying mechanisms, consequences, and opportunities for progress. Tropical Plant Pathology. 2023:1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s40858-023-00585-6 - 8.
Ma L, Sun R, Yang H, Li J, Wen X, Cao Z, et al. Metagenomics analysis revealed the coupling of lignin degradation with humus formation mediated via shell powder during composting. Bioresource Technology. 2022; 363 :127949. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127949 - 9.
Singh S, Bhoi TK, Khan I, Vyas V, Athulya R, Rathi A, et al. Climate change drivers and soil microbe-plant interactions. In: Climate Change and Microbiome Dynamics: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 157-176 - 10.
Huang R, McGrath SP, Hirsch PR, Clark IM, Storkey J, Wu L, et al. Plant–microbe networks in soil are weakened by century-long use of inorganic fertilizers. Microbial Biotechnology. 2019; 12 (6):1464-1475. DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13487 - 11.
Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, Van Doorn A, et al. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe–A review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2009; 91 (1):22-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005 - 12.
Poveda J, Martínez-Gómez Á, Fenoll C, Escobar C. The use of biochar for plant pathogen control. Phytopathology. 2021; 111 (9):1490-1499. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-20-0248-RVW - 13.
Ontl TA, Schulte LA. Soil carbon storage. Nature Education Knowledge. 2012; 3 (10) - 14.
Verheijen FG, Zhuravel A, Silva FC, Amaro A, Ben-Hur M, Keizer JJ. The influence of biochar particle size and concentration on bulk density and maximum water holding capacity of sandy vs sandy loam soil in a column experiment. Geoderma. 2019; 347 :194-202 - 15.
de Medeiros EV, Lima NT, de Sousa Lima JR, Pinto KMS, da Costa DP, Franco Junior CL, et al. Biochar as a strategy to manage plant diseases caused by pathogens inhabiting the soil: A critical review. Phytoparasitica. 2021; 49 (4):713-726. DOI: 10.1007/s12600-021-00887-y - 16.
Rawat J, Saxena J, Sanwal P. Biochar: A sustainable approach for improving plant growth and soil properties. Biochar-An Imperative Amendment for Soil and the Environment. IntechOpen; 2019. pp. 1-17 - 17.
Bhanse P, Kumar M, Singh L, Awasthi MK, Qureshi A. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in boosting the phytoremediation of stressed soils: Opportunities, challenges, and prospects. Chemosphere. 2022; 303 (1):134954. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134954 - 18.
Kamali M, Sweygers N, Al-Salem S, Appels L, Aminabhavi TM, Dewil R. Biochar for soil applications-sustainability aspects, challenges and future prospects. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2022; 428 :131189. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131189 - 19.
Elad Y, Cytryn E, Harel YM, Lew B, Graber ER. The biochar effect: Plant resistance to biotic stresses. Phytopathologia Mediterranea. 2011; 50 (3):335-349 - 20.
Zwart DC, Kim SH. Biochar amendment increases resistance to stem lesions caused by phytophthora spp. in tree seedlings. HortScience. 2012; 47 (12):1736-1740. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.47.12.1736 - 21.
Harel YM, Kolton M, Elad Y, Rav-David D, Cytryn E, Borenshtein M, et al. Biochar impact on plant development and disease resistance in pot trials. IOBC WPRS Bulletin. 2012; 78 :141-147 - 22.
Mehari ZH, Elad Y, Rav-David D, Graber ER, Meller Harel Y. Induced systemic resistance in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) againstBotrytis cinerea by biochar amendment involves jasmonic acid signaling. Plant and Soil. 2015;395 (1-2):31-44. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2445-1 - 23.
Liang C, Zhu X, Fu S, Méndez A, Gascó G, Paz-Ferreiro J. Biochar alters the resistance and resilience to drought in a tropical soil. Environmental Research Letters. 2014; 9 (6):064013. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064013 - 24.
Warnock DD, Lehmann J, Kuyper TW, Rillig MC. Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms. Plant and Soil. 2007; 300 (1-2):9-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5 - 25.
Graber ER, Meller Harel Y, Kolton M, Cytryn E, Silber A, Rav David D, et al. Biochar impact on development and productivity of pepper and tomato grown in fertigated soilless media. Plant and Soil. 2010; 337 (1-2):481-496. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0544-6 - 26.
Kolton M, Meller Harel Y, Pasternak Z, Graber ER, Elad Y, Cytryn E. Impact of biochar application to soil on the root-associated bacterial community structure of fully developed greenhouse pepper plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2011; 77 (14):4924-4930. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00148-11 - 27.
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2011; 43 (9):1812-1836. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 - 28.
Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P. Physical properties of biochar. In: Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Routledge; 2012. pp. 45-64 - 29.
Krull E, Singh B, Joseph S. Preface to special issue. Proceedings of the from the 1st Asia and the pacific biochar conference, 2009, gold coast, Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 2010; 48 :i-iv - 30.
Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, et al. Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agronomy Journal. 2010; 102 (2):623-633. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0083 - 31.
Yuan JH, Xu RK. The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Use and Management. Mar 2011; 27 (1):110-115 - 32.
Chan KY, Xu Z. Biochar: Nutrient properties and their enhancement. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. 2009; 1 :67-84 - 33.
Schofield HK, Pettitt TR, Tappin AD, Rollinson GK, Fitzsimons MF. Biochar incorporation increased nitrogen and carbon retention in a waste-derived soil. Science of the Total Environment. 2019; 690 :1228-1236. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.116 - 34.
Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, et al. Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2012; 41 (4):973-989. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2011.0069 - 35.
Jaiswal AK, Frenkel O, Elad Y, Lew B, Graber ER. Non-monotonic influence of biochar dose on bean seedling growth and susceptibility to Rhizoctonia solani: The “shifted R max-effect”. Plant and Soil. 2015; 395 (1-2):125-140. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2331-2 - 36.
Hou X, Meng L, Li L, Pan G, Li B. Biochar amendment to soils impairs developmental and reproductive performances of a major rice pest Nilaparvata lugens (Homopera: Delphacidae). Journal of Applied Entomology. 2015;139 (10):727-733. DOI: 10.1111/jen.12218 - 37.
Chen Y, Shen Y, Li B, Meng L. The effect of biochar amendment to soils on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on rice. Crop Protection. 2019; 124 :104842. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.06.002 - 38.
Kong M, Liang J, White JC, Elmer WH, Wang Y, Xu H, et al. Biochar nanoparticle-induced plant immunity and its application with the elicitor methoxyindole in Nicotiana benthamiana . Environmental Science: Nano. 2022;9 (9):3514-3524. DOI: 10.1039/D1EN00953B - 39.
Kong Y, Ma R, Li G, Wang G, Liu Y, Yuan J. Impact of biochar, calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer and spent mushroom substrate on humification and heavy metal passivation during composting. Science of the Total Environment. 2022; 824 :153755 - 40.
Waqas M, Shahzad R, Hamayun M, Asaf S, Khan AL, Kang SM, et al. Biochar amendment changes jasmonic acid levels in two rice varieties and alters their resistance to herbivory. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (1):e0191296. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191296 - 41.
Chen Y, Li R, Li B, Meng L. Biochar applications decrease reproductive potential of the English grain aphid Sitobionavenae and upregulate defense-related gene expression. Pest Management Science. 2019; 75 (5):1310-1316. DOI: 10.1002/ps.5245 - 42.
Lladó S, López-Mondéjar R, Baldrian P. Forest soil bacteria: Diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2017; 81 (2):e00063-e00016. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00063-16 - 43.
Ng EL, Cavagnaro TR. Biochar effects on ecosystems: Insights from lipid-based analysis. In: Biochar Application. Australia: Elsevier; 2016. pp. 55-77 - 44.
Wiednera K, Glaser B. Biochar-fungi interactions in soils. In: Ladygina N, Rineau F, editors. Biochar and Soil Biota. Halle, Germany: CRC Press; 2013. pp. 69-99 - 45.
Thies JE, Rillig MC, Graber ER. Biochar effects on the abundance, activity and diversity of the soil biota. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. 2015; 2 :327-389 - 46.
Watzinger A, Feichtmair S, Kitzler B, Zehetner F, Kloss S, Wimmer B, et al. Soil microbial communities responded to biochar application in temperate soils and slowly metabolized 13C-labelled biochar as revealed by 13C PLFA analyses: Results from a short-term incubation and pot experiment. European Journal of Soil Science. 2014; 65 (1):40-51. DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12100 - 47.
Kolton M, Graber ER, Tsehansky L, Elad Y, Cytryn E. Biochar-stimulated plant performance is strongly linked to microbial diversity and metabolic potential in the rhizosphere. New Phytologist. 2017; 213 (3):1393-1404. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14253 - 48.
Taskin E, de Castro Bueno C, Allegretta I, Terzano R, Rosa AH, Loffredo E. Multianalytical characterization of biochar and hydrochar produced from waste biomasses for environmental and agricultural applications. Chemosphere. 2019; 233 :422-430. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.204 - 49.
Wong JTF, Chen X, Deng W, Chai Y, Ng CWW, Wong MH. Effects of biochar on bacterial communities in a newly established landfill cover topsoil. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019; 236 :667-673. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.010 - 50.
Solaiman ZM, Abbott LK, Murphy DV. Biochar phosphorus concentration dictates mycorrhizal colonisation, plant growth and soil phosphorus cycling. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9 (1):5062. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41671-7 - 51.
Lieke T, Zhang X, Steinberg CEW, Pan B. Overlooked risks of biochars: Persistent free radicals trigger neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Science and Technology. 2018; 52 (14):7981-7987. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01338 - 52.
Wang H, Guo W, Liu B, Wu Q , Luo H, Zhao Q , et al. Edge-nitrogenated biochar for efficient peroxydisulfate activation: An electron transfer mechanism. Water Research. 2019; 160 :405-414. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.059 - 53.
Meng J, He T, Sanganyado E, Lan Y, Zhang W, Han X, et al. Development of the straw biochar returning concept in China. Biochar. 2019; 1 (2):139-149. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-019-00019-0 - 54.
Frenkel O, Jaiswal AK, Elad Y, Lew B, Kammann C, Graber ER. The effect of biochar on plant diseases: What should we learn while designing biochar substrates? Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management. 2017; 25 (2):105-113. DOI: 10.3846/16486897.2017.1307202 - 55.
Graber ER, Kookana RS. Biochar and retention/efficacy of pesticides. Biochar for Environmental Management. Routledge; 2015. pp. 655-678 - 56.
Bonanomi G, Ippolito F, Cesarano G, Nanni B, Lombardi N, Rita A, et al. Biochar as plant growth promoter: Better off alone or mixed with organic amendments? Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017; 8 :1570. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01570 - 57.
Graber ER, Elad Y. Biochar Impact on Plant Resistance to Disease. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2013. p. 278 - 58.
Lou K, Rajapaksha AU, Ok YS, Chang SX. Pyrolysis temperature and steam activation effects on sorption of phosphate on pine sawdust biochars in aqueous solutions. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability. 2016; 28 (1-4):42-50. DOI: 10.1080/09542299.2016.1165080 - 59.
Viger M, Hancock RD, Miglietta F, Taylor G. More plant growth but less plant defence? First global gene expression data for plants grown in soil amended with biochar. GCB Bioenergy. 2015; 7 (4):658-672. DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12182 - 60.
Choudhary TK, Khan KS, Hussain Q , Ashfaq M. Nutrient availability to maize crop ( Zea mays L.) in biochar amended alkaline subtropical soil. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2021;21 (2):1293-1306. DOI: 10.1007/s42729-021-00440-0 - 61.
Gu Y, Hou Y, Huang D, Hao Z, Wang X, Wei Z, et al. Application of biochar reduces Ralstonia solanacearum infection via effects on pathogen chemotaxis, swarming motility, and root exudate adsorption. Plant and Soil. 2017; 415 (1-2):269-281. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-3159-8 - 62.
Lu Y, Rao S, Huang F, Cai Y, Wang G, Cai K. Effects of biochar amendment on tomato bacterial wilt resistance and soil microbial amount and activity. International Journal of Agronomy. 2016; 2016 :1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2938282 - 63.
Zhang C, Lin Y, Tian X, Xu Q , Chen Z, Lin W. Tobacco bacterial wilt suppression with biochar soil addition associates to improved soil physiochemical properties and increased rhizosphere bacteria abundance. Applied Soil Ecology. 2017; 112 :90-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.12.005 - 64.
Doehlemann G, Ökmen B, Zhu W, Sharon A. Plant pathogenic fungi. Microbiology Spectrum. 2017; 5 (1):5-1. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0023-2016 - 65.
Summerell BA. Resolving fusarium: Current status of the genus. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 2019; 57 :323-339. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100204 - 66.
Elmer WH. Effect of leaf mold mulch, biochar, and earthworms on mycorrhizal colonization and yield of asparagus affected by fusarium crown and root rot. Plant Disease. 2016; 100 (12):2507-2512. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1196-RE - 67.
Elmer WH, Pignatello JJ. Effect of biochar amendments on mycorrhizal associations and fusarium crown and root rot of asparagus in replant soils. Plant Disease. 2011; 95 (8):960-966. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-10-10-0741 - 68.
Eo J, Park KC, Kim MH, Kwon SI, Song YJ. Effects of rice husk and rice husk biochar on root rot disease of ginseng (panax ginseng) and on soil organisms. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. 2018; 34 (1):27-39. DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2017.1363660 - 69.
Akhter A, Hage-Ahmed K, Soja G, Steinkellner S. Potential of fusarium wilt-inducing chlamydospores, in vitro behaviour in root exudates and physiology of tomato in biochar and compost amended soil. Plant and Soil. 2016; 406 (1-2):425-440. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-2948-4 - 70.
Akhter A, Hage-Ahmed K, Soja G, Steinkellner S. Compost and biochar alter mycorrhization, tomato root exudation, and development of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici . Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6 :529. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00529 - 71.
Wang W, Wang Z, Yang K, Wang P, Wang H, Guo L, et al. Biochar application alleviated negative plant–soil feedback by modifying soil microbiome. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020; 11 :799. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00799 - 72.
Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: An advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech. 2015; 5 (2):123-127. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-014-0214-0 - 73.
Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, Manning A, Grauman PV, Mar BG, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014; 371 (26):2488-2498. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408617 - 74.
Copley T, Bayen S, Jabaji S. Biochar amendment modifies expression of soybean and Rhizoctonia solani genes leading to increased severity of Rhizoctonia foliar blight. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8 :221. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00221 - 75.
Shirai M, Eulgem T. Molecular interactions between the soilborne pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina and its host plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14 :1264569. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1264569 - 76.
Petrasch S, Knapp SJ, Van Kan JAL, Blanco-Ulate B. Grey mould of strawberry, a devastating disease caused by the ubiquitous necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea . Molecular Plant Pathology. 2019;20 (6):877-892. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12794 - 77.
De Tender C, Vandecasteele B, Verstraeten B, Ommeslag S, Kyndt T, Debode J. Biochar-enhanced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruits (but not leaves) is associated with changes in the rhizosphere microbiome. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12 :700479. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.700479 - 78.
Al-Juboory HH, Hassan AK, Hatem MW. Efficiency of organic agents to control graymold disease caused by Botrytis cinerea in strawberry. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 2020;16 (1):1533-1537 - 79.
Hargreaves J, van West P. Oomycete-root interactions. In: Methods in Rhizosphere Biology Research. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK; 2019. pp. 83-103. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-5767-1_6 - 80.
Gravel V, Dorais M, Ménard C. Organic potted plants amended with biochar: Its effect on growth and Pythium colonization. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2013; 93 (6):1217-1227. DOI: 10.4141/cjps2013-315 - 81.
Singh R, Singh P, Singh H, Raghubanshi AS. Impact of sole and combined application of biochar, organic and chemical fertilizers on wheat crop yield and water productivity in a dry tropical agro-ecosystem. Biochar. 2019; 1 (2):229-235. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-019-00013-6 - 82.
Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Huang J, Zimmerman AR, Chen H, et al. Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of hydrogen peroxide modified ball milled biochar for the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions. Bioresource Technology. 2021; 337 :125432. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125432 - 83.
Muthusamy A, Singh R, Paul B, Rao MR, Murali TS. Occurrence and molecular identification of nematodes associated with brinjal ( Solanum melongena L.) var. Mattu Gulla. Indian Phytopathology. 2019;72 (3):453-459. DOI: 10.1007/s42360-019-00153-6 - 84.
Martínez-Gómez Á, Andrés MF, Barón-Sola Á, Díaz-Manzano FE, Yousef I, Mena IF, et al. Biochar from grape pomace, a waste of vitivinicultural origin, is effective for root-knot nematode control. Biochar. 2023; 5 (1):30. DOI: 10.1007/s42773-023-00228-8 - 85.
Rahman MA, Jahiruddin M, Kader MA, Islam MR, Solaiman ZM. Sugarcane bagasse biochar increases soil carbon sequestration and yields of maize and groundnut in Charland ecosystem. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2022; 68 (10):1338-1351. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2021.1892651 - 86.
George J, Azad LB, Poulose AM, An Y, Sarmah AK. Nano-mechanical behaviour of biochar-starch polymer composite: Investigation through advanced dynamic atomic force microscopy. Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2019; 124 :105486. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105486 - 87.
Mondal S, Ghosh S, Mukherjee A. Application of biochar and vermicompost against the rice root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne graminicola ): An eco-friendly approach in nematode management. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 2021;128 (3):819-829. DOI: 10.1007/s41348-021-00433-2 - 88.
Huang WK, Ji HL, Gheysen G, Debode J, Kyndt T. Biochar-amended potting medium reduces the susceptibility of rice to root-knot nematode infections. BMC Plant Biology. 2015; 15 :267. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0654-7 - 89.
Cheng H, Zhang D, Huang B, Song Z, Ren L, Hao B, et al. Organic fertilizer improves soil fertility and restores the bacterial community after 1, 3-dichloropropene fumigation. Science of the Total Environment. 2020; 738 :140345. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140345 - 90.
Wang L, Chen L, Tsang DCW, Guo B, Yang J, Shen Z, et al. Biochar as green additives in cement-based composites with carbon dioxide curing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 258 :120678. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120678