Different platforms used for vaccine development.
Abstract
Glycoconjugate is a molecule of carbohydrate covalently linked to another compound. In glycoconjugate vaccine, carbohydrate antigen is linked to another molecule, particularly a protein carrier. Vaccines targeting capsular polysaccharides can prevent bacterial infection. However, capsular polysaccharide alone is weak immunogenic as it produces a B cell immune response independent of T lymphocyte. To increase the immunogenicity, the capsular polysaccharide can be covalently linked to a protein carrier that converts carbohydrate antigen from T lymphocyte independent to T lymphocyte dependent antigen. Several carrier proteins such as tetanus toxoid (TT), diphtheria toxin (DT), the outer membrane protein complex (OMPC) of N. meningitides serogroup B, and Haemophilus protein D are currently used in licensed conjugate vaccines. The protein carrier in the glycoconjugate vaccine engages with T cell dependent immune response and the carbohydrate part engages with T cell independent immune response. The involvement of T cells in the immune response against the glycoconjugate vaccine helps in B cell proliferation and differentiation into memory B cell which is utmost important for long-term immunity. Carbohydrate structures decorated on the surface of pathogens and malignant cells can be considered as a key target in developing safe and effective vaccines to combat cancer, bacterial infections, viral infections.
Keywords
- glycoconjugate vaccine
- carrier protein
- infectious diseases
- malignant cells
- T-cell dependent immune response
1. Introduction
Vaccines since its first use played a crucial role in the prevention, control and eradication (such as smallpox in humans and rinderpest in animals) of diseases. The mass immunization program against the diseases for which vaccines are available save countless live and economics losses in both humans and animals. The recent example include mass immunization of humans against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) helped to reduce the mortality and hospitalization numbers. As per WHO data, current mass vaccination in children saved 2–3 million lives of children every year as result of that mortality in children of less than 5 years of age reduced from 93 deaths/1000 live births in year 1990 to 39 deaths/1000 live births in 2018. Vaccine is defined as a biological product that induces specific immune response against specific antigen and protects the individual against that disease on subsequent exposure to similar antigen [1]. An antigen may be anything such as a whole pathogen, small component of a pathogen, toxins produce by pathogen, etc. In the beginning of vaccine development, whole pathogen in the form of either live inactivated or killed was being used. With the advancement of medical science and biotechnological techniques, instead of using whole pathogen a small component of pathogens (subunit vaccine) that have both antigenicity and immunogenicity are being used for vaccine development. Moreover, many other platforms are being used for vaccine development such as DNA vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines, mRNA vaccine etc. The basic principle behind the protection given by vaccine is that vaccine induces the immune response against specific whole pathogen (either live, inactivated or killed) or small component of pathogen and immune system of body create a memory of this exposure in form of memory plasma cell, so that if individual gets exposure to same pathogen, it respond quickly without any delay, and clear the infection as soon as possible [2]. Whereas the naïve immune system starts developing antibodies after 7–10 days of its first exposure to antigen, called as primary response. But this primary antibody response consists of antibodies of IgM isotype that have low affinity for antigen. However, in primary response antibody titer is not enough and consists of IgM that is not sufficient to eliminate the infection completely. So, it is possible that animal may die due to delay immune response. The immune system requires more time approximately several days to few weeks to produce antibodies of either IgG, IgA or IgE isotypes that have the same antigen specificity but have high affinity to antigen [3]. Thus, mass immunization has been proved to be a very effective and economical way to prevent and control the diseases.
The word immunity is derived from the Latin word “
2. History of vaccines and immunization
Edward Jenner, an English Physician who discovered the smallpox vaccine using cow pox virus in year 1796, is considered as father of vaccine. Jenner collected matter from a cowpox sore on the hand of a milkmaid and inoculated into 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. Initially, James Phipps suffered from local reaction and ailing for several days but recovered soon and got lifelong immunity from smallpox. However, there are several evidence which show that the immunization practice has been started much before the Edward Jenner. In fifteenth century, people in different parts of world used to expose themselves intentionally to smallpox (by inhaling the crushed scab) to prevent the disease. In seventeenth century the Buddhist monks in China used to follow the practice of drinking snake venom to get immunity against the snake bite. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu brought smallpox inoculation to Europe in 1721. It is Benjamin Jesty, who in year 1774 tested his hypothesis that a cowpox virus when inoculated to human gives protection against smallpox. In May 1796, English Physician Edward Jenner expands on this discovery and inoculates 8-year-old James Phipps. Two months later, in July 1796, Jenner inoculates Phipps with matter from human smallpox sore in order to test Phipps’ resistance. Phipps remains in perfect health and becomes the first human to be vaccinated against smallpox. The term ‘vaccine’ is later coined, taken from the Latin word for cow, vacca. It is very difficult to forget the achievements of Louis Pasteur in the development of vaccines. In 1872, despite enduring a stroke and the death of two of his daughters due to typhoid, Louis Pasteur creates the first laboratory-produced vaccine for fowl cholera in chickens. In 1885, Louis Pasteur was able to prevent the rabies successfully through 13 injections of post-exposure vaccination to 9 year old boy named Joseph Meister by using formalin inactivated rabies virus. Since then, many vaccines have been developed and many are in developing phase. On 30 January, 2020 the WHO Director General declares the outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019 (SARS-CoV-2) to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. On 11 March, WHO confirms that COVID-19 is a pandemic. Effective COVID-19 vaccines are developed, produced and distributed with unprecedented speed, some using new mRNA technology. In December 2020, just 1 year after the first case of COVID-19 was detected, the first COVID-19 vaccine doses are administered. The vaccine development usually take 10 to 15 years including clinical trials, however, it is the first time in history when COVID-19 vaccine was developed and administered to the patient in one year. The reason for this was that different phases of clinical trials overlap with each other.
3. Immunogenic vaccine antigen
Antigen is a substance (molecule) when introduced into the body induce a specific immune response (either humoral or cellular) or capable of binding with products of an immune response such as antibodies or lymphocytes [4]. Examples of antigens include proteins, carbohydrate, lipids, nucleic acid, toxins, any foreign particle (non-self-antigen) and sometimes bodies own tissue and cells (self-antigen). All immunogens are antigen but it is essential that all antigens are immunogens. For better understanding, few definitions are given below:
4. Immune cells involved in immunization
First, it is very important to understand the different components of immune system. The immune system can be divided into two main subsystems; the innate immune system and acquired/adaptive immune system. The effective immune system is the result of interaction and co-ordination between innate and acquired immune system. There are four main differences between innate and acquired immune system. The first difference is that innate immune system is effective by birth, whereas, effective adaptive immune system develop with time as body acquires natural infections. The second difference is that innate immune system act in non-specific manner, whereas, adaptive immune system act in specific manner for specific pathogen/antigen. In literal meaning, innate immune system uses same weapon to all pathogen, whereas acquired immune system uses different weapons to different pathogen. The third difference is that innate immune system keeps no memory of antigen exposure, whereas adaptive immune system keeps memory of antigen exposure. The fourth difference is that the innate immune system is very fast (takes minutes to hours to respond) compared to adaptive immune response (takes few days to weeks to respond). However, the adaptive immune system has memory which means that the adaptive immune system will respond more rapidly to that particular pathogen with each successive exposure. The innate immune system includes anatomic barriers such as intact skin and mucous membranes, physiologic barriers as the normal body temperature, fever, gastric acidity, lysozyme, interferon, and collectins. The complement pathways are also a part of the defensive measures of the innate immune system. The inflammatory response is another essential part of the innate immune response. The inflammatory response allows products of immune system into area of infection or damage. The adaptive immune response is composed of the B cells/antibodies and T cells. Natural killer cells are also from the lymphocyte lineage like B cells and T cells; however, natural killer cells are only involved in innate immune responses. For an immune response to be effective, both the innate and adaptive immune systems must function. B cells that make antibodies (humoral immunity) and T cells (cellular immunity) are the mediators of the adaptive immune response. Additionally, in order for immunization to be effective, effector cells and memory cells need to be produced in order to cause long-term stimulation of the adaptive system’s humoral and cell-mediated arms. The body must first recognize the threat, whether it be a pathogenic agent or an immunization, as with any challenge to the immune system. Although B cells may also carry out this initial detection, the innate immune system typically handles this task. When the immune system detects antigen epitopes, the detection process starts. Small areas on antigens called epitopes mimic immune recognition. The innate immune system’s various components will then react to this threat. These innate immune system elements will opsonize or bind to the pathogen, assisting antigen-presenting cells like macrophages or monocytes in engulfing it. The pathogenic agent’s antigens will then be processed by these antigen-presenting cell(s), and they will be added to the surface of the antigen-presenting cell along with the MHC protein. If the antigen is viral or endogenous, the MHC-I protein will bind to it and the antigen-presenting cell will present it to a CD8+ T cell, which is likely to result in cell-mediated immunity. If the antigen is bacterial or parasitic or other exogenous antigen, MHC-II protein will bind to it and the antigen will be presented by the antigen-presenting cell to a CD4+ T cell, likely inducing antibody-mediated immunity. The majority of current vaccines are thought to confer protection primarily through the induction of antibodies, with the exception of BCG (which is thought to induce T cell responses that prevent severe disease and innate immune responses that may inhibit infection). There is a number of evidence to support the idea that different types of functional antibodies play a crucial role in vaccine-induced immunity, and it primarily comes from three different places: studies of passive immunity, immunological data, and immunodeficiency conditions.
5. Vaccine types
Vaccines are generally classified as live or non-live/ inactivated. Live vaccines contain those attenuated replicating strains of the relevant pathogenic organism. Non-live/inactivated vaccines contain killed whole organisms. Several other platforms, such as viral vectors, nucleic acid-based RNA and DNA vaccines, and virus-like particles, have been created over the past few decades in addition to the “traditional” live and non-live vaccines. It’s crucial to understand the difference between live and non-live vaccines. The live vaccines may have the potential to replicate uncontrollably in immune-compromised individuals resulting in some limitations on their use. Non-live vaccines, on the other hand, pose no risk to immune-compromised individuals. Example of live vaccines include measles, mumps, rubella and rotavirus vaccines, oral polio vaccine, BCG vaccine, and live attenuated influenza vaccine. Inactivated vaccines, on the other hand, do not always elicit as strong or long-lasting immune responses as live attenuated vaccines. Examples of inactivated vaccines include inactivated Polio vaccine, Hepatitis A vaccine, etc. In subunit vaccines, which contain no whole bacteria or viruses. Instead, these vaccines often include one or more particular pathogen-surface antigens. Subunit vaccinations provide an advantage over complete pathogen vaccines in that the immune response can concentrate on identifying a limited set of antigen targets. Subunit vaccinations frequently fail to elicit the same robust or durable immune response as live attenuated vaccines. Initially, they often call for repeated dosages, followed by booster dosage the following year. Subunit vaccinations frequently have adjuvants added. Adjuvants are the substances that support and prolong the immunological response to the vaccine. Aluminum salts (alum) have been extensively used as adjuvants for more than 80 years (HPV). The oil-in-water emulsion MF59, AS01 and AS04, are examples of novel adjuvants. As a result, with these kinds of immunizations, typical local reaction could be more obvious and frequent. In recombinant vaccines, a tiny fragment of DNA from the virus or bacterium that we want to protect ourselves from is obtained and introduced into the production cells. For instance, a portion of the DNA from the hepatitis B virus is introduced into the DNA of yeast cells to create the hepatitis B vaccine. Once one of the hepatitis B virus’s surface proteins is produced by these yeast cells, it is purified and employed as the vaccine’s active component. Recombinant vaccine examples include MenB vaccine, HPV vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccine. This has proteins from the outer layer of meningococcal bacteria. The recombinant method was used to create three of the proteins. Toxins generated by bacteria are inactivated in toxoid vaccinations using formalin or heat to lessen pathogenicity and are used as vaccine. These toxins can elicit an immune response despite being inactive and safe. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (whooping cough) vaccines are a few examples of toxoid vaccines. Toxoid and surface-derived proteins from the pertussis bacteria are both included in the pertussis vaccine. The vaccination is frequently described as “acellular.” In virus-like particles (VLPs), viral genetic material is absent which are entities that closely resemble viruses but are not infectious. They exist naturally or are created through individual expression of viral structural proteins, after which they self-assemble into forms that resemble viruses. In other circumstances, the viral structural proteins themselves serve as VLP vaccination antigens. As an alternative, VLPs can be created to display antigens from many diseases on their surface or to do so simultaneously. Due to the fact that each VLP includes numerous copies of an antigen on its surface, it can more efficiently elicit an immune response than a single copy. Outer member vesicles (OMV) vaccines are a more recent development in vaccine technology. Membrane vesicles (OMVs), which contain many of the antigens on the cell membrane, are naturally produced by bacteria. To create vaccines, these OMVs can be extracted from bacteria. The OMVs can also be altered to keep the antigens that are good at triggering an immune response while removing the harmful antigens. OMVs also function as adjuvants by nature. The MenB vaccine is authorized to use this technology. In contrast to conventional vaccines, nucleic acid vaccines do not provide the protein antigen, thus they operate differently. Instead, they impart the genetic code for the antigen to body cells, which then produce the antigen and trigger an immune response. Nucleic acid vaccines are quick and easy to develop and provide significant promise for the development of vaccines in the future. RNA vaccines and DNA vaccines are the two categories into which nucleic acid vaccines fall. In an RNA vaccination, messenger RNA is enclosed in a lipid membrane. When the mRNA first enters the body, its fatty layer protects it. However, it also facilitates entry into cells by joining with the cell membrane. The mRNA is translated into the antigen protein by internal cell machinery once it has entered the cell. Although this mRNA only persists for a few days on average, enough antigen is produced during that period to elicit an immunological response. The body then naturally breaks it down and eliminates it. RNA vaccines are unable to interact with the genetic code of humans (DNA). Currently, the UK has approved the use of two RNA vaccines for emergency situations. The COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer BioNTech are both made of RNA. DNA vaccines do not need the same initial protection because DNA is more stable than mRNA. DNA vaccinations are frequently given combined with a process known as electroporation. This enables the body’s cells to absorb the DNA vaccination by using low-frequency electrical waves. Before DNA can be translated into protein antigens that trigger an immune response, it first needs to be transcribed into mRNA in the cell nucleus. Although there are several DNA vaccines being developed, there are currently no licensed DNA vaccines available for commercial use. A more recent development in vaccine development is the use of viruses to carry the genetic code of the target antigens of the vaccine to body cells, where the cells can then create protein antigens to elicit an immune response. Viral vectored vaccines can be produced rapidly and easily on a wide scale since they can be generated in cell lines. When compared to nucleic acid vaccines and many subunit vaccines, viral vectored vaccines are typically produced at a significant cost savings. There are two types of viral vectored vaccines, depending on whether a replicating or non-replicating vector was utilized. When utilized as a platform for vaccine delivery, replicating viral vector vaccines retain the capacity to produce new viral particles in addition to delivering the vaccine antigen. This replicating virus, like live attenuated whole pathogen vaccines, has the intrinsic benefit over non-replicating vaccines in that it may supply a continuous stream of vaccine antigen over an extended period of time, which is likely to result in a higher immune response. Protection may be provided by a single vaccination. Replicating viral vectors are often chosen so that the viruses are attenuated or harmless, preventing disease while they are infecting the host. Despite this, there is a higher likelihood of moderate adverse reactions with these vaccines since viral replication is still occurring. Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus is used in the Ebola vaccine Ervebo (rVSV-ZEBOV). Over 90,000 people were protected by this vaccination during several Ebola outbreaks in Europe in 2019 after it received approval. The vaccine has mostly been employed in “ring vaccination,” which immunizes a person’s close contacts in order to stop the virus from spreading. When a vaccine uses a non-replicating viral vector, the vector nevertheless has the capacity to produce new virus particles while delivering the vaccine antigen to the cell. This is due to the deletion of essential viral genes required for viral replication. The vaccine cannot induce disease and adverse events linked to viral vector replication are also decreased. But only while the initial vaccine is still present in infected cells, vaccine antigen can be generated (a few days). Accordingly, booster doses are probably necessary because the immune response is typically less than with viral vectors that can replicate themselves. A non-replicating viral vector with the name of ChAdOx1 is also used in the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, which was authorized for use in emergency situations. The conjugate vaccine type is another challenging area with a numbers of successful vaccines available commercially. In conjugate vaccine, a hapten (polysaccharide or other molecules) is coupled to a carrier molecule. The polysaccharide is joined to diphtheria or tetanus toxoid protein (carrier) in the majority of conjugate vaccines which are specifically termed as glycoconjugate vaccine. These carrier molecules merely make the hapten more visible to the immune system. These proteins are relatively simple for the immune system to recognize, which contributes to a greater immunological reaction to the polysaccharide. MenC vaccine, Pneumococcal (PCV) vaccine, MenACWY vaccine, and Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine (TCV) are a few examples of glycoconjugate vaccines. Glycoconjugate vaccines are discussed further in detail. List of various platforms for vaccine development included in the Table 1.
S. N. | Platform | Example |
---|---|---|
1 | Live attenuated whole pathogen | Measles, mumps, rubella, yellow fever, influenza, oral polio, typhoid, Japanese encephalitis, rotavirus, BCG, varicella zoster |
2 | Killed whole pathogen | Whole-cell pertussis, polio, influenza, Japanese encephalitis, hepatitis A, rabies |
3 | Toxoid | Tetanus, diphtheria |
4 | Subunit vaccine | Pertussis, influenza, hepatitis B, meningococcal, pneumococcal, typhoid, hepatitis A, SARS-CoV-2 |
5 | Virus like particle (VLP) | Human papillomavirus, hepatitis B virus |
6 | Protein-polysaccharide conjugate | |
7 | Viral vectored | Ebola, SARS-CoV-2 |
8 | Outer membrane vessicle | Group B meningococcal |
9 | RNA vaccine (mRNA) | SARS-CoV-2 |
10 | DNA vaccine | SARS-CoV-2, West Nile Virus in horses, Melanoma vaccine for dogs |
11 | Bacterial vectored | Experimental |
12 | Antigen presenting cells | Experimental |
Table 1.
6. Glycoconjugate vaccine
Glycoconjugate vaccines are formed when a polysaccharide (mostly bacterial) is covalently linked with a protein providing epitopes for T lymphocyte which are required in the germinal centers for the affinity maturation of polysaccharide-specific B lymphocytes. Research has been shown that the bacterial conjugate vaccines can be used in all the age grouped including infants, adolescents, and the elderly, and are found to be among the safest and most successful vaccines developed during the last 40 years [5]. The theory of conjugate vaccine (glycans covalently linked to immunogenic proteins) was studied for the first time by Avery in the year 1931, and was introduced in the area of Antibacterial Vaccine in 90s [6]. There is a positive benefit of the glycoconjugate vaccines which when taken up by antigen-presenting cells, the conjugate molecule gets digested and the covalently-linked fragments of both polysaccharides and proteins are able to bind with the major histocompatibility complex II (MHC-II). This is then presented to T lymphocytes which in turn results to isotype switching from IgM to IgG and also induce B cell differentiation into memory cells, together act as a good vaccine. Tumor markers such as gangliosides, sialic acid-containing glycosphingolipids with extracellular polysaccharide head groups are expressed at high levels on the surface of cancer cells which are readily available to interact with the immune cells in turn acts as an antigen for cancer cells and becoming a potential cancer vaccine target. Though they have been proved to be a poor antigen but when synthetic antigen of gangliosides linked to polyamidoamine scaffolds to induce responses in γδ T lymphocyte receptor and CD8+ phenotypes was found to be therapeutic. For a glycoconjugate vaccine to be produced, each parts are prepared individually followed by conjugation of both the components into one molecule where only the polysaccharide part remains unique for each given vaccine. Traditionally a small group of proteins is used after inactivation of toxins that is toxoids. Toxins produced by some pathogenic cells or bacteria (can be used as bio-factories), are inactivated with formaldehyde or any other inactivating agents shown strong antigenicity and safe, for example tetanus toxoid (TT) has been used since 1924 till today. There is also possibility to use relatively nontoxic mutants including Cross Reactive Material 197 (CRM197) than the diphtheria toxoid (DT) [7]. The mechanism of how glycoconjugate vaccine works are briefed in the Figure 1.
![](/media/chapter/a043Y00000zFsnRQAS/a093Y00001dzLJIQA2/media/F1.png)
Figure 1.
Proposed mechanism of action of glycoconjugate vaccine to induce immune response.
7. Glycoconjugate vaccine production
There are three pathways for glycoconjugate vaccine production including:
Coupling of monofunctional oligosaccharides (after depolymerisation of the parent polysaccharide) or bifunctional oligosaccharides at low coupling efficiency, and either through direct attachment to the carrier protein or indirect attachment through a linker.
Activation of higher molecular weight polysaccharides without depolymerisation and conjugation through non-specific chemistry to multiple carrier proteins to give a very high molecular weight complex of >1 MDa size.
Reduced mass polysaccharides with multiple activations coupled to LPS-depleted outer membrane protein (OMP) vesicles.
Though the most of the protein carriers are related to toxins, there are also a various known proteins which can be used as carrier including keyhole limpet hemocyanin is being used as a carrier for glycoconjugate vaccines against
8. Carriers of glycoconjugate vaccine
The most widely used carriers are protein based. The commonly used carrier proteins are TT (tetanus toxoid), DT (diphtheria toxoid), OMPC (outer membrane protein complex of
9. Advances in glycoconjugate vaccine
Recently there are glycoconjugate vaccines which are successfully licensed worldwide against
Vaccine (manufacturer) | Licensed in (year) | Target organism | Carrier protein |
---|---|---|---|
Pedvax-Hib (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, USA) | 1990 | OMP | |
ActHib (Sanofi Pasteur SA, France) | 1993 | TT | |
Menactra (Sanofi Pasteur Inc., USA) | 2005 | DT | |
Hiberix (GSK, Belgium) | 2009 | TT | |
Menveo (GSK, Italy) | 2010 | CRM197 | |
Prevnar 13 (Pfizer, USA) | 2010 | CRM197 | |
Typbar-TVC (Bharat Biotech Ltd., India) | 2019 | TT | |
MenQuadfi (Sanofi Pasteur Inc., USA) | 2020 | TT |
Table 2.
Licensed glycoconjugate vaccines.
10. Conclusion
In the development of glycoconjugate vaccine, many factors play a crucial role such as saccharide size, carrier protein, conjugation chemistry and formulation. The methods are needed for faster identification of desired saccharide molecule on surface of pathogen, their characterization and their production in laboratory. The depth knowledge and extensive research of these factors will help in development of more effective glycoconjugate vaccines in short period of time. Moreover, we can expand their uses for cancer therapy. As we already have some licensed glycoconjugate vaccines for few infectious diseases, and for cancer therapy, there is ongoing phase lll trial; altogether we can see that this glycoconjugate vaccine has a great potential for some incurable disease conditions. In future to come up with effective glycoconjugate vaccines, we need more qualitative research and a good source of funding to solve the present disease scenario.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
antibody | |
antigen presenting cell | |
aluminum salt (Alum) | |
analytical ultracentrifugation | |
Bacillus Calmette Guérin | |
broad neutralizing antibodies | |
bovine serum albumin | |
cluster of differentiation | |
cytosine phosphate guanosine oligodeoxynucleotides | |
capsular polysaccharide | |
cross reactive material | |
deoxyribonucleic acid | |
diphtheria toxin | |
hemagglutinin | |
human immunodeficiency virus | |
high mannose patch | |
human papillomavirus | |
immunoglobulin M | |
lipoarabinomannan | |
lipopolysaccharide | |
meningococcus B | |
major histocompatibility complex | |
monophosphorylated lipid A | |
messenger ribonucleic acid | |
nuclear magnetic resonance | |
nucleotide oligomerization domain | |
outer membrane protein complex | |
outer member vesicle | |
pneumococcal vaccine | |
polyribosyl ribitol phosphate | |
pattern recognition receptor | |
retinoic acid-inducible gene-I | |
reactive oxygen species | |
tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens | |
typhoid conjugate vaccine | |
tetanus toxoid | |
Toll-like receptor | |
virus like particle | |
World Health Organization |
References
- 1.
Pollard AJ, Bijker EM. 2021. A guide to vaccinology: From basic principles to new developments. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2021; 21 (2):83-100 - 2.
Pulendran B, Ahmed R. Immunological mechanisms of vaccination. Nature Immunology. 2011; 12 (6):509-517 - 3.
Riddell NE. Immune Responses: Primary and Secondary. New Jersey, USA: eLS, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2023. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0029196 - 4.
Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Lymphocytes and the cellular basis of adaptive immunity. In: Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th ed. New York, USA: Garland Science; 2002 - 5.
Rappuoli R. Glycoconjugate vaccines: Principles and mechanisms. Science Translational Medicine. 2018; 10 :eaat4615 - 6.
Anderluh M, Berti F, Bzducha-Wrobel A, Chiodo F, Colombo C, Compostella F, et al. Recent advances on smart glycoconjugate vaccines in infections and cancer. The FEBS Journal. 2022; 289 :4251-4303 - 7.
MacCalman TE, Phillips-Jones MK, Harding SE. Glycoconjugate vaccines: Some observations on carrier and production methods. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews. 2020; 35 :93-125. DOI: 10.1080/02648725.2019.1703614 - 8.
Liao G, Zhou Z, Liao J, Zu L, Wu Q , Guo Z. 6-O-branched oligo-β-glucanbased antifungal glycoconjugate vaccines. ACS Infectious Diseases. 2016; 2 :123-131 - 9.
Komarova BS, Orekhova MV, Tsvetkov YE, Beau R, Aimanianda V, Latgé JP, et al. Synthesis of a pentasaccharide & neoglycoconjugates related to fungal α-(1→3)-glucan & their use in the generation of antibodies to trace aspergillus fumigatus cell wall. Chemistry—A European Journal. 2015; 21 :1029-1035 - 10.
Adamo R, Hu QY, Torosantucci A, Crotti S, Brogioni G, Allan M, et al. Deciphering the structure-immunogenicity relationship of anti-Candida glycoconjugate vaccines. Chemical Science. 2014; 5 :4302-4311 - 11.
Berti F, Ravenscroft N. Characterization of carbohydrate vaccines by NMR spectroscopy. In: Lepenies B, editor. Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines: Methods and Protocols Methods In Molecular Biology. Vol. 1331. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2015. pp. 189-209 - 12.
Harding SE, Abdelhameed AS, Gills RB, Morris GA, Adams GG. Characterization of capsular polysaccharies and their glycoconjugates by hydrodynamic methods. In: Lepenies B, editor. Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines: Methods and Protocols Methods In Molecular Biology. Vol. 1331. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2015. pp. 211-227 - 13.
Biemans R, Micoli F, Romano MR. Glycoconjugate vaccines, production and characterization. Recent Trends in Carbohydrate Chemistry. 2020; 2 :285-313. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-820954-7.00008-6 - 14.
Togashi T, Mitsuya N, Kogawara O, Sumino S, Takanami Y, Sugizaki K. Immunogenicity & safety of a fully liquid aluminum phosphate adjuvanted Haemophilus influenzae type b PRP-CRM197-conjugate vaccine in healthy Japanese children: A phase III, randomized, observer-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study. Vaccine. 2016; 34 :4635-4641 - 15.
Akeda Y, Koizumi Y, Takanami Y, Sumino S, Hattori Y, Sugizaki K, et al. Comparison of serum bactericidal & antibody titers induced by two Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines: A phase III randomized double-blind study. Vaccine. 2018; 36 :1528-1532 - 16.
Chu RS, McCool T, Greenspan NS, Schreiber JR, Harding CV. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides act as adjuvants for pneumococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines and enhance antipolysaccharide immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) and IgG3 antibodies. Infection and Immunity. 2000; 68 :1450-1456 - 17.
von Hunolstein C, Mariotti S, Teloni R, Alfarone G, Romagnoli G, Orefici G, et al. The adjuvant effect of synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide containing CpG motif converts the anti-haemophilus influenzae type b glycoconjugates into efficient antipolysaccharide and anti-carrier polyvalent vaccines. Vaccine. 2001; 19 :3058-3066 - 18.
Liao G, Zhou Z, Suryawanshi S, Mondal MA, Guo Z. Fully synthetic self-adjuvanting a-2,9- oligosialic acid based conjugate vaccines against group C meningitis. ACS Central Science. 2016; 2 :210-218 - 19.
Wang L, Feng S, Wang S, Li H, Guo Z, Gu G. Synthesis and immunological comparison of differently linked lipoarabinomannan oligosaccharidemonophosphoryl lipid A conjugates as antituberculosis vaccines. Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2017; 82 :12085-12096 - 20.
Deng S, Bai L, Reboulet R, Matthew R, Engler DA, Teyton L, et al. A peptidefree, liposome-based oligosaccharide vaccine, adjuvanted with a natural killer T cell antigen, generates robust antibody responses in vivo. Chemical Science. 2014; 5 :1437-1441 - 21.
Hassane FS, Phalipon A, Tanguy M, Guerreiro C, Belot F, Frisch B, et al. Rational design and immunogenicity of liposomebased diepitope constructs: Application to synthetic oligosaccharides mimicking the Shigella flexneri 2a Oantigen. Vaccine. 2009; 27 :5419-5426 - 22.
Borja-Tabora CFC, Montalban C, Memish ZA, Boutriau D, Kolhe D, Miller JM, et al. Long-term immunogenicity & safety after a single dose of the quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, & Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in adolescents & adults: 5-year follow-up of an open, randomized trial. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2015; 15 :409 - 23.
Holme D, Findlow H, Sow SO, Idoko OT, Preziosi MP, Carlone G, et al. Neisseria meningitidis Group A IgG1 & IgG2 subclass immune response in African children aged 12-23 months following meningococcal vaccination. Clinical Infectios Diseases. 2015; 61 :563-569 - 24.
Ramasamy MN, Clutterbuck EA, Haworth K, Bowman J, Omar O, Thompson AJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the immunogenicity of quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate & polysaccharide vaccines in adults in the United Kingdom. Clinical Vaccine Immunology. 2014; 21 :1164-1168 - 25.
Rothstein EP, Schiller RP, Girone JA, Hipp TJ, Souder RL, Bernstein HH, et al. Response of 7- to 15-month-old infants to sequential immunization with Haemophilus influenzae type b-CRM197 conjugate & polysaccharide vaccines. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1991; 1991 (145):898-900 - 26.
Berndsen ZT, Chakraborty S, Wang X, Cottrell CA, Torres JL, Diedrich JK, et al. Visualization of the HIV-1 Env glycan shield across scales. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020; 117 :28014-28025 - 27.
McLellan JS, Pancera M, Carrico C, Gorman J, Julien J-P, Khayat R, et al. Structure of HIV-1 Gp120 V1/V2 domain with broadly neutralizing antibody PG9. Nature. 2011; 480 :336-343 - 28.
Pejchal R, Doores KJ, Walker LM, Khayat R, Huang P-S, Wang S-K, et al. A potent and broad neutralizing antibody recognizes and penetrates the HIV glycan shield. Science. 2011; 334 :1097-1103 - 29.
Walker LM, Huber M, Doores KJ, Falkowska E, Pejchal R, Julien J-P, et al. Broad neutralization coverage of HIV by multiple highly potent antibodies. Nature. 2011; 477 :466-470 - 30.
Cai H, Orwenyo J, Giddens JP, Yang Q , Zhang R, LaBranche CC, et al. Synthetic three-component HIV-1 V3 glycopeptide immunogens induce glycan-dependent antibody responses. Cell Chemical Biology. 2017; 24 :1513-1522 - 31.
Huang Y-L, Hung J-T, Cheung SKC, Lee H-Y, Chu K-C, Li S-T, et al. Carbohydrate-based vaccines with a glycolipid adjuvant for breast cancer. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110 :2517-2522 - 32.
Yin Z, Wu X, Kaczanowska K, Sungsuwan S, Aragones MC, Pett C, et al. Antitumor humoral and T cell responses by mucin-1 conjugates of bacteriophage Qb in wild-type mice. ACS Chemical Biology. 2018; 13 :1668-1676 - 33.
Wu X, Yin Z, McKay C, Pett C, Yu J, Schorlemer M, et al. Protective epitope discovery and design of MUC1-based vaccine for effective tumor protections in immunotolerant mice. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2018; 140 :16596-16609