Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Online Activity Tracking in Educational Institutions

Written By

Yaw Boateng Ampadu

Submitted: 23 August 2023 Reviewed: 13 September 2023 Published: 10 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1003084

From the Edited Volume

Online Identity - An Essential Guide

Rohit Raja and Amit Kumar Dewangan

Chapter metrics overview

5 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Online activity tracking in educational institutions is the practice of monitoring and evaluating students’ digital behavior to gain insights into their engagement and academic progress. With the growing prevalence of e-learning platforms, online collaboration tools, and virtual classrooms, educators have increasingly turned to online activity tracking as a valuable tool. This chapter explores the role of online activity tracking in enhancing academic performance, focusing on its benefits and ethical considerations. Early warning systems (EWS) play a crucial role in online activity tracking by enabling educators to identify underperforming students and provide personalized support. However, it is essential to use online activity tracking ethically and securely, mindful of data privacy concerns. This chapter discusses the ethical use of online activity tracking, its potential challenges, and recommended best practices. Discover how online activity tracking can positively impact student progress, engage with the latest trends in digital learning, and explore the role of virtual classrooms and e-learning platforms in shaping modern education.

Keywords

  • online activity tracking
  • digital activities
  • student progress
  • early warning systems
  • e-learning platforms
  • virtual classrooms
  • data privacy
  • ethical considerations

1. Introduction

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the use of online learning systems in educational institutions. The development of online education has increased the amount of data generated by student activity, including text, online discussions and analysis of student interactions with digital learning materials Online Activity Management To collect, analyze and have been used to improve the quality of teaching and learning in online educational programs [1]. Online activity tracking uses educational data mining (EDM) techniques to extract knowledge from large amounts of student-generated content [2]. These techniques have been used in a variety of contexts, including predicting student performance [3], identifying at-risk students [4], and improving instructional design [5].

The use of online activity tracking can provide valuable insights into student behavior and learning, allowing educators to personalize learning experiences to the needs of individual students [6]. This can lead to improved learning outcomes and student engagement [7]. However, the use of online activity tracking also raises ethical concerns, particularly with respect to data privacy and security [8].

Despite the potential benefits of online activity tracking, there are also challenges and limitations associated with its use [9]. These challenges include issues related to data privacy and security, as well as the potential for bias in data analysis [8].

The primary objective of this book chapter is to furnish educators and researchers with an all-encompassing overview of the many benefits and challenges associated with the practice of online activity tracking within educational institutions. The chapter effectively leverages pertinent literature to delve into the various methodologies and techniques employed in the collection and analysis of data. It also delves into the wide range of potential applications that online activity tracking can offer. Furthermore, it addresses the ethical considerations that come into play when engaging in such practices. This chapter will further address the challenges and constraints associated with online activity tracking, while offering suggestions for educators and researchers seeking to implement online activity tracking within their respective institutions.

Advertisement

2. Methods of tracking online activities

Tracking online activities in educational institutions uses various software and tools to analyze students’ digital interactions, providing valuable insights into engagement, progress, and well-being. These methods help educators tailor teaching strategies and support interventions.

2.1 Tracking software and tools

Online activity tracking software and tools for educational institutions are applications that monitor and record the online behavior and actions of students and teachers [10]. These tools can help educators to assess the progress, engagement, and performance of learners, as well as to identify areas of improvement, intervention, or support [11]. Educational institutions have the option to leverage specialized tracking software and tools that are specifically designed to closely monitor and track students’ activities on various digital platforms and learning resources [12]. Online activity tracking software and tools can also help to ensure the academic integrity, security, and privacy of online learning environments [13]. Some examples of online activity tracking software and tools are:

  • Learning analytics platforms: These are systems that collect and analyze data from various sources, such as learning management systems, online assessments, quizzes, surveys, etc. They can provide insights into the learning outcomes, patterns, preferences, and challenges of students and teachers [10, 12, 14].

  • Screen recording and monitoring software: These are applications that capture and record the screen activity of students and teachers during online sessions [15, 16]. They can help to verify the identity, attendance, and participation of learners, as well as to detect any cheating or plagiarism attempts [17, 18].

  • Web filtering and blocking software: These are applications that restrict or block access to certain websites or content that are deemed inappropriate, harmful, or distracting for online learning [19]. They can help to prevent students from accessing unauthorized or malicious resources, as well as to enhance their focus and productivity [20].

A variety of state-of-the-art monitoring software and tools exist with the purpose of keeping tabs on and analyzing pupils’ use of various online resources. These instruments can track and record a wide variety of communications in cyberspace. They keep track on important data including how often users check in and how long they spend on each tasks. This generates a lot of quantitative data that may be used to infer variables like student motivation and performance. Online courses with built-in tracking tools make it possible to observe how students engage with course materials [21]. Technology like this can help teachers pinpoint problem areas for their kids, which can then be addressed to improve education as a whole.

2.2 Learning management systems (LMS)

Learning Management Systems (LMS) serve as robust platforms that empower institutions to effectively manage and closely track different elements of online learning [22]. LMS platforms have gained significant popularity in online and blended learning environments [23]. Their primary purpose is to efficiently manage and facilitate the delivery of educational content to learners. LMS systems frequently incorporate integrated tracking capabilities that enable educators to effectively monitor students’ progress, participation, and performance within the digital learning environment [22, 24, 25]. Educators are equipped with comprehensive data regarding students’ completion rates, quiz scores, and various other indicators of learning engagement [26, 27, 28]. This valuable information empowers them to offer personalized feedback and support, ensuring a more tailored and effective educational experience [29, 30, 31].

2.3 Social media monitoring

Social media monitoring encompasses the observation and analysis of students’ engagements and behaviors on various social media platforms [32, 33, 34]. This practice allows for an in-depth comprehension of their social interactions and activities. Social media monitoring tools can be utilized by educational institutions to gain valuable insights into students’ online presence, peer connections, and potential well-being considerations [35]. Educational institutions often leverage the potential of tracking students’ social media activities to acquire valuable insights regarding their social interactions, interests, and overall well-being [36]. Engaging in social media monitoring enables educators to gain valuable insights into students’ non-academic behaviors and social integration, thereby facilitating comprehensive support for their holistic development [37]. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that implementing this approach may give rise to concerns regarding privacy and ethics [38]. Therefore, it is imperative to approach this matter with the utmost sensitivity and ensure that consent is obtained before proceeding [39].

2.4 Web analytics

Web analytics in education involves the systematic gathering, examination, and interpretation of data related to online engagements and interactions between students, teachers, administrators, and other key individuals within an educational institution’s digital domains [10, 40, 41]. The primary objective is to acquire valuable insights regarding user behavior, preferences, and engagement patterns to enhance the overall educational experience and improve outcomes [42]. Key aspects of web analytics in education include engaging in user behavior analysis, engaging in engagement tracking, maximizing content efficiency, clustering students based on demographics, geographical location, or enrolment in specific courses, dropping and retention analysis, identifying and addressing potential usability and accessibility concerns, utilizing online assessments and quizzes for assessment and feedback, enhancing decision-making, and embracing continuous improvement [43, 44, 45].

User behavior analysis helps educators understand the popularity and effectiveness of resources and activities, while engagement tracking allows for the monitoring of student engagement levels with online content [46]. Content efficiency is maximized by examining frequently accessed materials and user engagement durations [47]. Clustering allows for the tailoring of learning materials to meet the unique needs and preferences of different groups of students, creating personalized learning experiences [48].

Dropout and retention analysis helps educators identify patterns that may indicate potential student dropouts and implement proactive measures to address these issues [49]. It also enables educators to identify and address potential usability and accessibility concerns within digital platforms, ensuring a data-driven approach to optimizing educational experiences [50].

2.5 Mobile device tracking

In today’s educational landscape, the widespread availability of mobile devices has made tracking mobile activities an indispensable practice. Mobile device tracking tools offer a comprehensive solution for monitoring students’ usage patterns, app utilization, and location data [51]. These powerful tools provide valuable insights into the ways in which students interact with learning materials on their smartphones or tablets. The provided data has the potential to offer valuable insights into the learning habits and preferences of students [52].

It is of utmost importance to acknowledge that mobile device tracking provides invaluable insights for educational institutions [53]. However, it is crucial to recognize that they also give rise to substantial privacy concerns and ethical considerations [54]. It is important for educational institutions to prioritize transparency in their data tracking practices and uphold the utmost responsibility and security when handling student data [55]. Ensuring the implementation of suitable data protection measures and securing informed consent from both students and parents are essential steps in effectively addressing privacy concerns [56]. By skillfully utilizing these techniques in a responsible manner, educational institutions have the opportunity to acquire invaluable data that can be used to optimize teaching strategies, customize interventions, and establish individualized learning experiences for students. This, in turn, plays a pivotal role in fostering academic achievement and holistic growth among students.

Advertisement

3. Benefits of tracking online activities

The educational benefits of activity tracking extend well beyond the learning environment. It provides better choices and more customized experiences for users by analyzing their online behavior. As a result, it enables more individualized instruction, more user engagement, and the identification of trends that can be used to influence strategic decisions [46]. Data-driven analysis makes it possible to use online activity tracking as a springboard for rapid growth and improvement in the online environment [57]. Below are some benefits of tracking online activities in education.

3.1 Understanding student behavior

Educators may gain a deeper understanding of their students’ engagement with digital learning resources including course materials, quizzes, and discussion forums when they engage in the practice of tracking online activity [58]. The collected data has the potential to unveil insightful patterns in student behavior, shedding light on various aspects such as the allocation of time towards specific tasks, favored study periods, and identifying potential areas of difficulty for students [42]. Educators have the opportunity to enhance their understanding of student engagement with educational content, identify the most beneficial resources for them, and pinpoint potential areas of difficulty [59]. Educators acquire vital insights by understanding these patterns, facilitating the identification of potential challenges and the subsequent customization of instructional techniques. Through the discovery of this knowledge, educators are enabled to personalize their teaching methodologies and conduct focused interventions that respond to the distinct needs of their learners [60].

Through the observation of online activities, educators possess the ability to assess the levels of student engagement and effectively pinpoint students who may exhibit signs of disengagement or be susceptible to the risk of dropping out [61]. The effective use of this data enables the creation of highly captivating learning experiences that effectively motivate students. Implementing timely intervention strategies can effectively enhance the provision of additional support and resources to students in need [7]. Additionally, by closely monitoring engagement metrics, educators can effectively optimize their instructional approaches, resulting in the development of highly captivating and interactive online learning experiences [62]. This, in turn, has the potential to significantly enhance student retention rates. Online activity tracking has the potential to increase students’ and teachers’ perceptions of connectedness and community. It may also improve online education’s quality and efficiency by gaining insights and recommendations for curriculum design, instructional tactics, assessment methodologies, and feedback mechanisms that are grounded in data [6]. By increasing learners’ interest for learning and their likelihood of staying in a virtual learning class, online activity tracking helps all parties involved.

3.2 Enhancing teacher effectiveness

Tracking online activities can yield numerous advantages, not only for students but also for educators seeking to enhance their effectiveness in the realm of education. Through the careful analysis of data generated from student interactions, educators have the opportunity to gain valuable insights into the efficacy of their instructional materials, teaching methodologies, and assessment approaches [63]. By leveraging a data-driven approach, educators are empowered to make informed decisions based on valuable insights. This allows them to effectively adapt their teaching strategies and consistently enhance their teaching practices. The implementation of this iterative improvement process serves to optimize teacher efficacy and cultivate a climate that prioritizes making informed decisions based on data.

3.3 Predicting student performance

Tracking online activities can provide valuable insights into the growth and patterns of students’ progress and performance as time unfolds. Educators possess the remarkable ability to discern patterns that exhibit a strong correlation with student performance and overall success. Educational institutions have the capability to leverage predictive models in order to proactively anticipate potential challenges and effectively identify students who may be at risk and in need of supplementary support [64]. Adopting this proactive approach empower educators to take early action and implement focused interventions aimed at enhancing student outcomes.

In online activity tracking, it has been observed that students who diligently complete particular types of assignments or actively participate in specific learning activities often exhibit superior performance in assessments [65]. By leveraging this valuable data, educators possess the ability to proactively anticipate potential academic hurdles and strategically intervene to mitigate any negative impact on performance. Identification of students who may be facing challenges at an early stage is crucial in order to provide timely assistance and intervention [60]. This proactive approach can have a profound effect on the overall academic performance and success of these students.

3.4 Data-driven decision making

Institutions are able to make judgments at multiple levels based on the collected and analyzed data from online activities, ranging from individual student interventions to wider improvements in curriculum and policy. This data may be collected and analyzed online. Decision-making that is informed by data gives educational institutions the ability to be more responsive and nimbler in meeting the requirements of students and enhancing the quality of the learning environment [66]. It is possible to obtain useful data that may be used to inform and enhance many different areas of the educational process if educational institutions track the online activities of their students [10]. The ability to monitor and analyze a student’s online activities provides a multitude of advantages that contribute to academic achievement and overall school quality [67]. These advantages range from the comprehension of student behaviors to the improvement of the efficiency of teaching and the customization of educational experiences. It is essential, however, to find a balance between the advantages of data collecting and respecting the privacy and autonomy of students. This is necessary in order to ensure that data is utilized in a responsible and ethical manner in order to improve the educational experience. In addition, it is of the utmost importance to make sure that the information gathered is put to instructional use only, and that it is not mishandled in any way or given out to unauthorized individuals [68]. Tracking students’ online actions has the potential to be a useful tool that, if used in a responsible manner, may improve the quality of their entire educational experience and boost their chances of being successful [69].

Advertisement

4. Challenges of online activity tracking

The pervasive incorporation of technology in the field of education has resulted in a paradigm shift, wherein the conventional classroom setting has been replaced by a digital environment. The emergence of online learning platforms has granted educational institutions the capability to monitor students’ online behaviors, thereby offering significant information into their academic performance and level of involvement. While this technological development exhibits potential for augmenting the educational experience, it also presents a distinct array of challenges. This section examines the difficulties related to the monitoring of online activities in educational institutions and the resulting effects on students, educators, and issues regarding privacy.

4.1 Internet connectivity and access disparities

Online activity monitoring faces challenges due to the lack of equitable access to stable internet connections and digital devices among students. This digital divide can lead to skewed conclusions and a lack of personalized learning, interventions, and data-driven feedback [70]. To overcome this issue, educational institutions must close the opportunity gap and provide equal access to education [71]. This can be achieved by making technology and internet access available to impoverished students, providing offline materials, and advocating for inclusive pedagogical practices [72]. Administrators and teachers must be aware of potential bias in data collected due to differing degrees of access. Educational institutions can also collaborate with local and national governments and nonprofit groups to increase the availability and affordability of digital infrastructure and resources [73].

Prioritizing students’ equitable access to technology is crucial for the efficacy and fairness of data collection in online activity tracking [74]. By resolving this issue, educational institutions can create a welcoming classroom for all students and use data collected from students’ digital footprints to promote their growth and development.

4.2 Consent and ethical considerations

Online activity tracking is a complex process that necessitates informed consent from students and parents before data collection. This raises ethical concerns about privacy, transparency, and fairness. Institutions must communicate the purpose and scope of data tracking transparently to students and parents, allowing them to make informed decisions about their participation [75]. Balancing data-driven insights with potential privacy intrusions is a challenge. Algorithmic bias can also arise, as students with different backgrounds may be treated differently [76]. Educational institutions must address and reduce these biases to prevent perpetuating disparities and prejudices. Adhering to ethical data practices and open communication with parents and students can help strike a balance between data-driven advantages and protecting students’ privacy and dignity.

4.3 Technical infrastructure and accessibility

The digital divide poses a significant challenge to educational institutions in monitoring online activities. It requires investment in technologies like learning management systems (LMS), data storage, and bandwidth to process data generated from online transactions. This divide can exacerbate educational disparities and hinder effective online pursuits for all students. To ensure efficient online activity tracking, a strong technological infrastructure is needed, including digital platforms and technologies [77]. However, access to technology is another major obstacle, as students from different socioeconomic backgrounds or geographic locations lack similar access. Addressing the digital divide requires equitable access to technology for every student, including devices, internet connectivity, offline resources, and community partnerships [78]. Strategic investment in technology and promoting accessibility can enhance the overall learning experience, boost student success, and foster an optimal learning environment [77].

4.4 Privacy/ethical concerns and data security

Online activity tracking is a crucial issue for educational institutions to protect students’ sensitive data and monitor their educational progress. This data, including personal information and browsing patterns, is valuable for educators but also poses risks. Balancing data-driven insights with privacy rights is a delicate task. Institutions must communicate transparently with students and parents about data collection and allow them to opt-out if uncomfortable [79]. Ethical considerations are also crucial, as institutions must use collected data responsibly and avoid potential pitfalls like profiling or discrimination. To address these challenges, institutions must adopt robust data protection measures, implement stringent security protocols, and conduct regular audits and risk assessments [80].

4.5 Diverse learning styles and assessment

Educational institutions face challenges in accommodating diverse learning styles and assessing student progress through online activity tracking. While online tracking data is valuable for understanding student interactions and behaviors, it may not fully capture individual learning styles [81]. A standardized approach may not capture students’ strengths and weaknesses, leading to misinterpretation of progress and insufficient support. To address this, educational institutions should use a diverse range of assessment methods, including project-based assessments, hands-on activities, and personalized feedback [82]. One-on-one interactions with students are effective in understanding their unique needs and providing personalized support [83].

4.6 Data interpretation and decision-making

The complexity of utilizing collected data for educational interventions is a significant challenge in online activity tracking and data interpretation. The educational process is complex and influenced by factors like individual learning styles, socio-emotional needs, and external influences. The reliance on quantitative data in educational data mining may oversimplify the learning process. A comprehensive approach is needed, incorporating qualitative assessments and expert judgment to understand students’ abilities, difficulties, and motivations. Educators should leverage their professional experience to contextualize data and identify suitable interventions [84]. To avoid reliance on standardized metrics, educational institutions should cultivate a culture of data-informed decision-making that considers both quantitative and qualitative inputs. Professional development programs can empower educators to analyze and leverage educational data effectively [85].

4.7 Monitoring non-academic activities

Online activity tracking in educational institutions is a complex process that involves monitoring non-academic activities like social interactions and internet browsing habits to understand students’ behaviors and identify support needs [86]. However, this raises concerns about surveillance and intrusion into students’ personal lives. To ensure ethical implications, institutions must implement robust data protection measures, communicate with students and parents about the purpose and extent of data tracking, and limit data collection to essential information [87]. By implementing transparent data practices and complying with privacy laws, institutions can leverage online activity tracking to support students’ holistic development while safeguarding their privacy and dignity [88].

Advertisement

5. Data mining techniques for analyzing online activity data

Data mining techniques such as Descriptive Analytics, Predictive Analytics and Prescriptive Analytics play a crucial role in enabling educational institutions to make informed decisions and extract important insights from the large volume of online activity data produced by students, teachers, and other stakeholders.

5.1 Descriptive analytics

The goal of descriptive analytics is to provide insight into the past by examining or exploring data from the past. Descriptive analytics present a holistic perspective of user habits and routines as they relate to data collected throughout their time spent online [89]. This method is useful for education administrators and teachers in analyzing internet activity data for trends, patterns, and relationships. Table 1 shows the data mining techniques commonly used in descriptive analytics:

Data mining techniqueUses in descriptive analytics
Data aggregationCollecting and summarizing data from various online sources to gain a broader perspective of user activities, such as page views, clicks, time spent on a website, etc.
Data visualizationRepresenting online activity data through charts, graphs, and other visualizations to present trends and patterns in an easy-to-understand manner.
Clustering analysisGrouping similar online users or activities together based on certain characteristics, helping identify user segments and their preferences.
Sequence analysisAnalyzing the order of user actions to identify typical user journeys and the most common paths through a website or app.
Cohort analysisDividing users into cohorts based on common characteristics (e.g., sign-up date, location) to compare and analyze their behaviors over time.

Table 1.

Data mining technique for descriptive analytics in education.

Educators may benefit from descriptive analytics since it helps them learn about how students have behaved in the past and where there may be room for growth. Among the many educational applications of descriptive analytics are:

  • Student engagement analysis: Students’ engagement with digital resources for education may be evaluated using descriptive analytics. It aids in determining the most and least liked aspects of a course, allowing for enhancements and a more satisfying educational experience [90].

  • Course performance evaluation: Educators may evaluate the success of both individual students and whole class by analyzing their digital footprints. Student behavior patterns may be revealed, and major weaknesses in instruction can be identified [91].

  • Resource utilization: Educational institutions have the ability to employ descriptive analytics for the purpose of monitoring the usage of various online resources, including digital libraries, virtual classrooms, and learning management systems. This valuable insight aids in the optimization of resource allocation and empowers individuals to make data-informed decisions regarding investments in technology and content.

5.2 Diagnostic analytics

Diagnostic analytics in education is a method that uses data analysis to understand the factors contributing to specific learning outcomes. It involves examining student performance, engagement, and other educational factors to identify patterns and reasons for achievements and obstacles. The primary goal is to provide educators and institutions with valuable insights to optimize teaching and learning experiences. Table 2 explains the data mining techniques used in descriptive analytics.

Data mining techniqueUses in descriptive analytics
Learning analyticsAnalyzing student interactions with online learning platforms to identify patterns and trends in engagement and performance.
Predictive modelingForecasting student performance or outcomes based on historical data and patterns, helping identify students at risk of underperforming.
ClusteringGrouping students with similar learning behaviors, helping identify cohorts that may need targeted interventions or support.
Decision treesCreating decision trees to understand the factors influencing student outcomes, enabling the classification of students into specific categories.
Sequential pattern miningIdentifying sequences of actions or behaviors in student learning paths to uncover trends or obstacles.

Table 2.

Data mining technique for diagnostic analytics in education.

Diagnostic analytics in education uses data mining techniques to provide educators with insights into student performance, identifying potential challenges and implementing targeted interventions. This approach enhances learning outcomes and academic success by enhancing instructional effectiveness and overall educational processes. Here are the benefits of diagnostic analytics in education:

  • Personalized learning: By utilizing diagnostic analytics, educators can acquire a comprehensive insight into the unique strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles of every student [92]. By strategically customizing instruction, assignments, and interventions, educators have the ability to optimize student engagement and elevate academic performance.

  • Early intervention: One of the key benefits of employing diagnostic analytics lies in its capability to promptly detect learning challenges or areas of concern at the initial stages of the learning journey [93]. Through the analysis of various data points, including assessment scores and behavioral patterns, educators will be capable to identify students who may be encountering challenges and proactively intervene to address these issues before they potentially escalate. Implementing early intervention strategies is crucial in mitigating the risk of learning gaps widening and ensuring students maintain their progress on track.

  • Engaging in data-informed decision making: By utilizing diagnostic analytics, educators, administrators, and policymakers gain the ability to make well-informed decisions that are grounded in evidence and driven by valuable insights extracted from data [94]. Engaging in data-driven decision-making is crucial for optimizing educational practices. Continuously refining curriculum, adapting teaching strategies, and strategically allocating resources for interventions, educators can enhance the effectiveness of their instructional approaches [95]. Diagnostic analytics is a valuable tool in education for continuous improvement. It helps enhance teaching methodologies, curriculum offerings, and support structures by analyzing data and evaluating interventions [96]. This iterative process improves the quality of education and allows educators to adapt to student needs. It also allows for personalized learning experiences, timely interventions, decision-making guidance, resource optimization, and continuous improvement, leading to better teaching and learning outcomes [94].

5.3 Predictive analytics

Predictive analytics is a powerful technique that leverages historical data to forecast and anticipate future behaviors, events, and trends. By analyzing patterns and trends from the past, predictive analytics enables us to make informed predictions about what may happen in the future. In education, predictive analytics plays a pivotal role in discerning potential outcomes and behaviors by leveraging patterns and correlations found within online activity data [6]. Below, is a comprehensive list of data mining techniques that are commonly utilized in the field of predictive analytics (Table 3).

Data mining techniqueUses in predictive analytics
Machine learning algorithmsUtilizing various machine learning algorithms like regression, decision trees, random forests, and neural networks to build predictive models based on historical data.
Time series analysisAnalyzing time-stamped online activity data to forecast future trends and patterns, such as website traffic or user engagement.
Anomaly detectionIdentifying unusual or abnormal user behavior that deviates from expected patterns, which can help in fraud detection or preventive actions.

Table 3.

Data mining technique for predictive analytics in education.

Harnessing the power of data and advanced algorithms, predictive analytics can provide valuable insights and help optimize various aspects of the educational experience. Here are a few key applications of predictive analytics in educational institutions:

  • Student success prediction: Predictive analytics can analyze historical data on student performance, attendance, and engagement to identify patterns and indicators of success or risk [97].

  • Engaging in the practice of Student Retention and Dropout Prediction, educational institutions leverage the power of data analysis to construct sophisticated predictive models [50]. These models enable them to proactively identify students who may be at risk of discontinuing their studies. With prompt initiating intervention strategies, educational institutions can effectively enhance retention rates and provide valuable assistance to students who may be facing challenges.

  • Forecasting course completion: Leveraging the power of predictive analytics can accurately predict the probability of students successfully completing a course [98]. By utilizing this feature, educators gain the ability to effectively identify students who may benefit from additional support and subsequently customize interventions to meet their specific needs.

  • Optimal resource allocation: Through the use of advanced predictive techniques, educational institutions can strategically allocate their online resources and courses to meet the anticipated demand [50]. This approach allows for efficient planning of infrastructure and staffing needs, ensuring a seamless learning experience for students.

5.4 Prescriptive analytics

Prescriptive analytics takes data analysis to the next level, surpassing descriptive and predictive analytics. It is a method used in online activity data analysis to provide expert guidance on the most effective strategies to achieve specific goals [99]. Harnessing both historical and predictive data, this predictive analytics empowers users with invaluable insights that can be readily translated into actionable steps [100]. Table 4 explains the data mining techniques used in predictive analytics.

Data mining techniqueUses in prescriptive analytics
Optimization modelsUsing mathematical optimization techniques to identify the best strategies for maximizing objectives, such as optimizing website layouts for higher conversion rates.
SimulationCreating virtual simulations of different scenarios to test potential strategies and evaluate their impact on user behaviors and outcomes.
Recommender systemsLeveraging collaborative filtering or content-based filtering methods to provide personalized recommendations to users, increasing engagement and conversions.

Table 4.

Data mining technique for prescriptive analytics in education.

Prescriptive analytics holds immense potential in educational institutions, offering a range of impactful applications. Let us explore some of the ways in which prescriptive analytics can be effectively leveraged in the educational landscape.

  • Personalized learning paths: Leveraging the power of students’ online activity data and their past performance, prescriptive analytics has the ability to provide tailored learning paths and content recommendations that are specifically designed to align with individual learning styles and unique needs [92].

  • Intervention strategies: Through the integration of predictive models and prescriptive analytics, institutions can effectively devise intervention strategies to proactively tackle student challenges [101]. One potential avenue to explore is the provision of tailored recommendations for learning resources, fostering opportunities for peer collaborations, and facilitating access to instructor-led support.

  • Curriculum design and enhancement: Prescriptive analytics serves as a powerful tool for educational institutions to optimize their curricula [102]. By pinpointing areas that require improvement, recommending novel course offerings, and aligning educational content with the ever-changing demands of students and the job market, institutions can effectively design and refine their curricula to ensure maximum impact and relevance.

Utilizing descriptive, predictive, and prescriptive analytics can enhance online learning environments, improve student outcomes, and enhance institution effectiveness. Ensuring data privacy and security is crucial, and stakeholders should be involved for informed decision-making based on valuable insights.

Advertisement

6. Best practices for online activity tracking

Achieving a balance between educational knowledge acquisition and privacy preservation is crucial. A meticulous approach is needed to navigate the educational landscape while maintaining privacy. Advanced methods like anonymization and aggregation ensure confidentiality and data security. Obtaining explicit informed consent from stakeholders fosters trust and individual autonomy [55]. Transparent communication outlines the purpose and utilization of data, allowing individuals to make informed decisions. Promoting transparency creates a harmonious balance between privacy rights and valuable educational insights gained through data integration. By promoting transparency, educational institutions can enhance learning outcomes while protecting privacy rights.

6.1 Ensuring the protection of valuable insights through the implementation of robust data security measures

Data security and confidentiality are crucial in establishing trust and adhering to data protection regulations in educational settings. Ensuring data integrity through robust encryption techniques and access control measures is essential. These measures limit access to authorized personnel, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive data. Consistent security audits identify and address potential vulnerabilities, while a strategic incident response plan maintains resilience in the face of a data breach. Efficient communication protocols and timely notification of relevant parties are essential for establishing a robust foundation for protecting valuable data assets in educational environments.

6.2 Fostering trust via open and transparent data monitoring

Promoting trust and understanding between students and faculty is crucial for transparency in data tracking in educational institutions. A well-rounded data usage policy should clearly outline data collection principles, purpose, and authorized access. Privacy notices and intuitive dashboards can help users understand tracking procedures. Data evaluation and adjustment systems empower students and faculty to take control of their information, fostering a culture of precision and responsibility. These measures contribute to an educational landscape where stakeholders are actively engaged and invested in data tracking.

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Online activity tracking in education is a powerful tool for driving change and growth. It involves balancing data-driven observations with privacy protection, ensuring informed consent and promoting a culture of openness. Data security and confidentiality are crucial in the digital landscape, with encryption protocols, access controls, and regular security audits ensuring data security. Regular communication channels and incident response plans help address potential vulnerabilities.

Data tracking empowers stakeholders by fostering transparency. Institutions create a robust data usage policy, providing transparency about data’s purpose and destination. Transparent privacy notices and user-friendly dashboards promote well-informed consent and active engagement. Encouraging individuals to analyze and correct their recorded data demonstrates precision and responsibility in the pursuit of knowledge.

In conclusion, online activity tracking in education entails a dynamic exploration of the intersection between data and ethics. By adopting techniques in data minimization, anonymization, stakeholder engagement, data security, transparency, and accountability, educational institutions can harness the limitless power of data analytics to propel educational advancement while maintaining the fundamental principles of education.

References

  1. 1. Ray S, Saeed M. Applications of educational data mining and learning analytics tools in handling big data in higher education. In: Applications of Big Data Analytics: Trends, Issues, and Challenges. 2018. pp. 135-160
  2. 2. Ang KLM, Ge FL, Seng KP. Big educational data & analytics: Survey, architecture and challenges. IEEE Access. 2020;8:116392-116414
  3. 3. Anoopkumar M, Rahman AMZ. A review on data mining techniques and factors used in educational data mining to predict student amelioration. In: In 2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE). IEEE; 2016. pp. 122-133
  4. 4. Sarra A, Fontanella L, Di Zio S. Identifying students at risk of academic failure within the educational data mining framework. Social Indicators Research. 2019;146:41-60
  5. 5. Algarni A. Data mining in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 2016;7(6)
  6. 6. Bienkowski M, Feng M, Means B. Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education; 2012
  7. 7. Lu OH, Huang JC, Huang AY, Yang SJ. Applying learning analytics for improving students engagement and learning outcomes in an MOOCs enabled collaborative programming course. In: Learning Analytics. Routledge; 2018. pp. 78-92
  8. 8. Regan PM, Jesse J. Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: Twenty-first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology. 2019;21:167-179
  9. 9. Wilson A, Watson C, Thompson TL, Drew V, Doyle S. Learning analytics: Challenges and limitations. Teaching in Higher Education. 2017;22(8):991-1007
  10. 10. Romero C, Ventura S. Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2020;10(3):e1355
  11. 11. Kew SN, Tasir Z. Learning analytics in online learning environment: A systematic review on the focuses and the types of student-related analytics data. In: Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2022. pp. 1-23
  12. 12. Hernández-de-Menéndez M, Morales-Menendez R, Escobar CA, Ramírez Mendoza RA. Learning analytics: State of the art. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). 2022;16(3):1209-1230
  13. 13. Hussein MJ, Yusuf J, Deb AS, Fong L, Naidu S. An evaluation of online proctoring tools. Open Praxis. 2020;12(4):509-525
  14. 14. Ramaswami G, Susnjak T, Mathrani A, Umer R. Use of predictive analytics within learning analytics dashboards: A review of case studies. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2023;28(3):959-980
  15. 15. de Brito Lima F, Lautert SL, Gomes AS. Contrasting levels of student engagement in blended and non-blended learning scenarios. Computers & Education. 2021;172:104241
  16. 16. Labayen M, Vea R, Flórez J, Aginako N, Sierra B. Online student authentication and proctoring system based on multimodal biometrics technology. IEEE Access. 2021;9:72398-72411
  17. 17. Azevedo R, Gašević D. Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019;96:207-210
  18. 18. Shraim K. Online examination practices in higher education institutions: Learners’ perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2019;20(4):185-196
  19. 19. Shivsharnappa MS. A New Tool Designing for Content Filtration of E Learning Sites Using Web Mining Technique; 2023
  20. 20. Che CKNSA, Rafee KM, Usop NSM. Towards secure local area network (LAN) using OPNSENSE firewall. Malaysian Journal of Computing and Applied Mathematics. 2023;6(1):10-20
  21. 21. Zhang H, Almeroth K, Knight A, Bulger M, Mayer R. Moodog: Tracking students' Online Learning Activities. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); 2007, June. pp. 4415-4422
  22. 22. Shurygin V, Saenko N, Zekiy A, Klochko E, Kulapov M. Learning management systems in academic and corporate distance education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2021;16(11):121-139
  23. 23. Fahd K, Miah SJ, Ahmed K. Predicting student performance in a blended learning environment using learning management system interaction data. Applied Computing and Informatics. 2021 [Ahead-of-print]
  24. 24. Bradley VM. Learning management system (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education. 2021;4(1):68-92
  25. 25. Lee CM. Learning Management Systems (LMS) towards Helping Teachers and Students in the Pursuit of their E-Learning Methodologies; 2021
  26. 26. Liz-Domínguez M, Caeiro-Rodríguez M, Llamas-Nistal M, Mikic-Fonte FA. Systematic literature review of predictive analysis tools in higher education. Applied Sciences. 2019;9(24):5569
  27. 27. Wang FH. An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education. 2017;114:79-91
  28. 28. Yau JYK, Ifenthaler D. Reflections on different learning analytics indicators for supporting study success. International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education: IJAI. 2020;2(2):4-23
  29. 29. Marinova D, de Ruyter K, Huang MH, Meuter ML, Challagalla G. Getting smart: Learning from technology-empowered frontline interactions. Journal of Service Research. 2017;20(1):29-42
  30. 30. Muñoz JLR, Ojeda FM, Jurado DLA, Peña PFP, Carranza CPM, Berríos HQ , et al. Systematic review of adaptive learning technology for learning in higher education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2022;98(98):221-233
  31. 31. Kallick B, Zmuda A. Students at The Center: Personalized Learning with Habits of Mind. Ascd; 2017
  32. 32. Alshuaibi MSI, Alshuaibi ASI, Shamsudin FM, Arshad DA. Use of social media, student engagement, and academic performance of business students in Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Management. 2018;32(4):625-640
  33. 33. Chugh R, Ruhi U. Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies. 2018;23:605-616
  34. 34. Van Dijck J, Poell T. Social media platforms and education. In: The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. 2018. pp. 579-591
  35. 35. Yeung D. Social media as a catalyst for policy action and social change for health and well-being. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018;20(3):e94
  36. 36. Burr C, Taddeo M, Floridi L. The ethics of digital well-being: A thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2020;26(4):2313-2343
  37. 37. Chang SL, Kabilan MK. Using social media as e-portfolios to support learning in higher education: A literature analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2022:1-28
  38. 38. Akgun S, Greenhow C. Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics. 2021:1-10
  39. 39. Ali A, Qadir J, Sathiaseelan A, Zwitter A, Crowcroft J. Big data for development: applications and techniques. Big Data Analytics. 2016;1(1):1-24
  40. 40. Massanelli J, Sexton KW, Lesher CT, Jensen HK, Kimbrough MK, Privratsky A, et al. Integration of web analytics into graduate medical education: Usability study. JMIR Formative Research. 2021;5(12):e29748
  41. 41. Nguyen A, Gardner L, Sheridan D. Data analytics in higher education: An integrated view. Journal of Information Systems Education. 2020;31(1):61
  42. 42. Aldowah H, Al-Samarraie H, Fauzy WM. Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics. 2019;37:13-49
  43. 43. Lalmas M, O'Brien H, Yom-Tov E. Measuring user engagement. Springer Nature; 2022
  44. 44. Macfadyen LP, Dawson S, Pardo A, Gaševic D. Embracing big data in complex educational systems: The learning analytics imperative and the policy challenge. Research & Practice in Assessment. 2014;9:17-28
  45. 45. Mandinach EB, Jackson SS. Transforming Teaching and Learning through Data-Driven Decision Making. Corwin Press; 2012
  46. 46. Williamson B. Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Big Data in Education. 2017:1-256
  47. 47. Roche CC, Wingo NP, Westfall AO, Azuero A, Dempsey DM, Willig JH. Educational analytics: A new frontier for gamification? Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN. 2018;36(9):458
  48. 48. Trivedi S, Patel N. Clustering students based on virtual learning engagement, digital skills, and E-learning infrastructure: Applications of K-means, DBSCAN, hierarchical, and affinity propagation clustering. Sage Science Review of Educational Technology. 2020;3(1):1-13
  49. 49. De Silva LMH, Chounta IA, Rodríguez-Triana MJ, Roa ER, Gramberg A, Valk A. Toward an institutional analytics agenda for addressing student dropout in higher education: An academic Stakeholders' perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics. 2022;9(2):179-201
  50. 50. Daniel B. Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015;46(5):904-920
  51. 51. Sharples M. Mobile learning: Research, practice and challenges. Distance Education in China. 2013;3(5):5-11
  52. 52. Rossing JP, Miller W, Cecil AK, Stamper SE. iLearning: The future of higher education? In: Student Perceptions on Learning with Mobile Tablets. 2012
  53. 53. Avella JT, Kebritchi M, Nunn SG, Kanai T. Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning. 2016;20(2):13-29
  54. 54. Chang B. Student privacy issues in online learning environments. Distance Education. 2021;42(1):55-69
  55. 55. Slade S, Prinsloo P. Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57(10):1510-1529
  56. 56. Huang RH, Liu DJ, Zhu LX, Chen HY, Yang JF, Tlili A, et al. Personal Data and Privacy Protection in Online Learning: Guidance for Students, Teachers and Parents. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University; 2020. p. 109
  57. 57. West DM. Big data for education: Data mining, data analytics, and web dashboards. Governance Studies at Brookings. 2012;4(1):1-10
  58. 58. Macfadyen LP, Dawson S. Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education. 2010;54(2):588-599
  59. 59. Sinakou E, Donche V, Boeve-de Pauw J, Van Petegem P. Designing powerful learning environments in education for sustainable development: A conceptual framework. Sustainability. 2019;11(21):5994
  60. 60. Mubarak AA, Cao H, Zhang W. Prediction of students’ early dropout based on their interaction logs in online learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. 2022;30(8):1414-1433
  61. 61. McMahon BM, Sembiante SF. Re-envisioning the purpose of early warning systems: Shifting the mindset from student identification to meaningful prediction and intervention. Review of Education. 2020;8(1):266-301
  62. 62. Al Mamun MA, Lawrie G. Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments. 2023;10(1):1
  63. 63. Fischer C, Pardos ZA, Baker RS, Williams JJ, Smyth P, Yu R, et al. Mining big data in education: Affordances and challenges. Review of Research in Education. 2020;44(1):130-160
  64. 64. Bai X, Zhang F, Li J, Guo T, Aziz A, Jin A, et al. Educational big data: Predictions, applications and challenges. Big Data Research. 2021;26:100270
  65. 65. Wong J, Khalil M, Baars M, de Koning BB, Paas F. Exploring sequences of learner activities in relation to self-regulated learning in a massive open online course. Computers & Education. 2019;140:103595
  66. 66. Gagliardi J, Parnell A, Carpenter-Hubin J. The analytics revolution in higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 2018;50(2):22-29
  67. 67. Albreiki B, Zaki N, Alashwal H. A systematic literature review of student’performance prediction using machine learning techniques. Education Sciences. 2021;11(9):552
  68. 68. Adejo O, Connolly T. Learning analytics in a shared-network educational environment: Ethical issues and countermeasures. Learning. 2017;8(4):156-163
  69. 69. Romero C, Ventura S. Educational data science in massive open online courses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2017;7(1):e1187
  70. 70. Topali P, Chounta IA, Martínez-Monés A, Dimitriadis Y. Delving into instructor-led feedback interventions informed by learning analytics in massive open online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2023
  71. 71. Blanden J, Doepke M, Stuhler J. Educational Inequality (No. w29979). National Bureau of Economic Research; 2022
  72. 72. Hackman ST, Reindl S. Challenging EdTech: Towards a more inclusive, accessible and purposeful version of EdTech. Knowledge Cultures. 2022;10(1):7-21
  73. 73. Sharma A. Role of Information and Communications Technology in Improving Equity and Quality of Education in India. Vol. 66. ICT India Working Paper; 2022
  74. 74. Safonov Y, Usyk V, Bazhenkov I. Digital transformations of education policy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2022;8(2):127-136
  75. 75. Motz R, Díaz-Charquero P. Fair learning analytics: Design, participation, and trans-discipline in the techno-structure. In: Data Cultures in Higher Education: Emergent Practices and the Challenge Ahead. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 71-87
  76. 76. Salac J, Oleson A, Armstrong L, Le Meur A, Ko AJ. Funds of Knowledge Used by Adolescents of Color in Scaffolded Sensemaking around Algorithmic Fairness; 2023
  77. 77. Simamora RM. The challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching. 2020;1(2):86-103
  78. 78. Afzal A, Khan S, Daud S, Ahmad Z, Butt A. Addressing the digital divide: Access and use of Technology in Education. Journal of Social Sciences Review. 2023;3(2):883-895
  79. 79. Rubel A, Jones KM. Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective. The Information Society. 2016;32(2):143-159
  80. 80. Mantelero A. Regulating big data. The guidelines of the Council of Europe in the context of the European data protection framework. Computer Law & Security Review. 2017;33(5):584-602
  81. 81. Balti R, Hedhili A, Chaari WL, Abed M. Hybrid analysis of the learner’s online behavior based on learning style. Education and Information Technologies. 2023:1-40
  82. 82. Rehman N, Zhang W, Mahmood A, Fareed MZ, Batool S. Fostering twenty-first century skills among primary school students through math project-based learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10(1):1-12
  83. 83. Shemshack A, Spector JM. A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments. 2020;7(1):1-20
  84. 84. Lewinski AA, Crowley MJ, Miller C, Bosworth HB, Jackson GL, Steinhauser K, et al. Applied rapid qualitative analysis to develop a contextually appropriate intervention and increase the likelihood of uptake. Medical Care. 2021;59(6 Suppl. 3):S242
  85. 85. Hennessy S, D'Angelo S, McIntyre N, Koomar S, Kreimeia A, Cao L, et al. Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open. 2022;3:100080
  86. 86. Anthonysamy L, Koo AC, Hew SH. Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review. Education and Information Technologies. 2020;25:3677-3704
  87. 87. Ngiam KY, Khor W. Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. The Lancet Oncology. 2019;20(5):e262-e273
  88. 88. Mita S. AI proctoring: Academic integrity vs. student rights. Hastings LJ. 2022;74:1513
  89. 89. Susnjak T, Ramaswami GS, Mathrani A. Learning analytics dashboard: A tool for providing actionable insights to learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2022;19(1):12
  90. 90. Havik T, Westergård E. Do teachers matter? Students’ perceptions of classroom interactions and student engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2020;64(4):488-507
  91. 91. Liu QF, Iqbal MF, Yang J, Lu XY, Zhang P, Rauf M. Prediction of chloride diffusivity in concrete using artificial neural network: Modelling and performance evaluation. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;268:121082
  92. 92. Maseleno A, Sabani N, Huda M, Ahmad R, Jasmi KA, Basiron B. Demystifying learning analytics in personalised learning. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE). 2018
  93. 93. Mridha K, Ghimire S, Shin J, Aran A, Uddin MM, Mridha MF. Automated stroke prediction using machine learning: An explainable and exploratory study with a web application for early intervention. IEEE Access. 2023
  94. 94. Kaufman TE, Graham CR, Picciano AG, Popham JA, Wiley D. Data-driven decision making in the K-12 classroom. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. 2014:337-346
  95. 95. Mattingly KD, Rice MC, Berge ZL. Learning Analytics as a Tool for Closing the Assessment Loop in Higher Education. UMBC College of Engineering and Information Technology Dean's Office; 2012
  96. 96. Sclater N, Peasgood A, Mullan J. Learning Analytics in Higher Education. London: Jisc; 2016. p. 176
  97. 97. Waheed H, Hassan SU, Aljohani NR, Hardman J, Alelyani S, Nawaz R. Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big data using deep learning models. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;104:106189
  98. 98. Smith VC, Lange A, Huston DR. Predictive modeling to forecast student outcomes and drive effective interventions in online community college courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2012;16(3):51-61
  99. 99. Bari A, Chaouchi M, Jung T. Predictive Analytics for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons; 2016
  100. 100. Dart S, Cunningham S. Using institutional data to drive quality, improvement, and innovation. In: Technology-Enhanced Learning and the Virtual University. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023. pp. 1-24
  101. 101. Mahalle PN, Hujare PP, Shinde GR. Predictive Analytics for Mechanical Engineering: A Beginners Guide. Springer Nature; 2023
  102. 102. Kurni M, Mohammed MS, Srinivasa KG. Predictive analytics in education. In: A Beginner's Guide to Introduce Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. pp. 55-81

Written By

Yaw Boateng Ampadu

Submitted: 23 August 2023 Reviewed: 13 September 2023 Published: 10 April 2024